Assessing phototoxicity in live fluorescence imaging.

Are the answers to biological questions obtained via live fluorescence microscopy substantially affected by phototoxicity? Although a single set of standards for assessing phototoxicity cannot exist owing to the breadth of samples and experimental questions associated with biological imaging, we need quantitative, practical assessments and reporting standards to ensure that imaging has a minimal impact on observed biological processes and sample health. Here we discuss the problem of phototoxicity in biology and suggest guidelines to improve its reporting and assessment.

Flavoprotein miniSOG as a genetically encoded photosensitizer for cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Genetically encoded photosensitizers are a promising optogenetic instrument for light-induced production of reactive oxygen species in desired locations within cells in vitro or whole body in vivo. Only two such photosensitizers are currently known, GFP-like protein KillerRed and FMN-binding protein miniSOG. In this work we studied phototoxic effects of miniSOG in cancer cells. METHODS: HeLa Kyoto cell lines stably expressing miniSOG in different localizations, namely, plasma membrane, mitochondria or chromatin (fused with histone H2B) were created. Phototoxicity of miniSOG was tested on the cells in vitro and tumor xenografts in vivo. RESULTS: Blue light induced pronounced cell death in all three cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Caspase 3 activation was characteristic of illuminated cells with mitochondria- and chromatin-localized miniSOG, but not with miniSOG in the plasma membrane. In addition, H2B-miniSOG-expressing cells demonstrated light-induced activation of DNA repair machinery, which indicates massive damage of genomic DNA. In contrast to these in vitro data, no detectable phototoxicity was observed on tumor xenografts with HeLa Kyoto cell lines expressing mitochondria- or chromatin-localized miniSOG. CONCLUSIONS: miniSOG is an excellent genetically encoded photosensitizer for mammalian cells in vitro, but it is inferior to KillerRed in the HeLa tumor. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to assess phototoxicity of miniSOG in cancer cells. The results suggest an effective ontogenetic tool and may be of interest for molecular and cell biology and biomedical applications.

The blue light receptor complex WC-1/2 of Schizophyllum commune is involved in mushroom formation and protection against phototoxicity.

Blue light is necessary for initiation of mushroom formation in Schizophyllum commune. The genome of this basidiomycete contains homologues of the blue light receptor genes wc-1 and wc-2 of Neurospora crassa. Here, it is shown that inactivation of either or both of these genes in S. commune results in a blind phenotype. Mushroom formation was abolished in dikaryons and they formed symmetrical instead of asymmetrical colonies. Development was restored in a temperature dependent way in a Δwc-2Δwc-2 strain by introducing a construct encompassing the wc-2 gene under control of the promoter of the heat shock gene hsp3. A genome-wide expression analysis showed that the transcription factor genes c2h2 and hom1 as well as many hydrophobin genes are downregulated in light-grown colonies of the Δwc-2Δwc-2 mutant when compared with the wild-type dikaryon. Inactivation of wc-1 and/or wc-2 also resulted in sensitivity of the mycelium to intense light. Monokaryotic mutant strains only survived exposure to 6500 lux of light by growing into the agar. Expression analysis indicates that the photosensitivity of the Δwc-1 and Δwc-2 strains is due to lower levels of photolyase and ferrochelatase.

Molecular genetic basis for fluoroquinolone-induced retinal degeneration in cats.

OBJECTIVES: Distribution of fluoroquinolones to the retina is normally restricted by ABCG2 at the blood-retinal barrier. As the cat develops a species-specific adverse reaction to photoreactive fluoroquinolones, our goal was to investigate ABCG2 as a candidate gene for fluoroquinolone-induced retinal degeneration and blindness in cats. METHODS: Feline ABCG2 was sequenced and the consensus amino acid sequence was compared with that of 10 other mammalian species. Expression of ABCG2 in feline retina was assessed by immunoblot. cDNA constructs for feline and human ABCG2 were constructed in a pcDNA3 expression vector and expressed in HEK-293 cells, and ABCG2 expression was analyzed by western blot and immunofluorescence. Mitoxantrone and BODIPY-prazosin efflux measured by flow cytometry and a phototoxicity assay were used to assess feline and human ABCG2 function. RESULTS: Four feline-specific (compared with 10 other mammalian species) amino acid changes in conserved regions of ABCG2 were identified. Expression of ABCG2 on plasma membranes was confirmed in feline retina and in cells transfected with human and feline ABCG2, although some intracellular expression of feline ABCG2 was detected by immunofluorescence. Function of feline ABCG2, compared with human ABCG2, was found to be deficient as determined by flow cytometric measurement of mitoxantrone and BODIPY-prazosin efflux and enrofloxacin-induced phototoxicity assays. CONCLUSION: Feline-specific amino acid changes in ABCG2 cause a functional defect of the transport protein in cats. This functional defect may be owing, in part, to defective cellular localization of feline ABCG2. Regardless, dysfunction of ABCG2 at the blood-retinal barrier likely results in accumulation of photoreactive fluoroquinolones in feline retina. Exposure of the retina to light would then generate reactive oxygen species that would cause the characteristic retinal degeneration and blindness documented in some cats receiving high doses of some fluoroquinolones. Pharmacological inhibition of ABCG2 in other species might result in retinal damage if fluoroquinolones are concurrently administered.

Chronic phototoxicity and aggressive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in children and adults during treatment with voriconazole.

BACKGROUND: Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent associated with photosensitivity and accelerated photoaging. A possible link with aggressive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has also been reported. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the incidence and frequency of cutaneous SCC among patients undergoing long-term treatment with voriconazole who also manifest features of chronic phototoxicity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who developed one or more squamous cell neoplasms during long-term treatment with voriconazole at 3 academic dermatology centers. RESULTS: A total of 51 cutaneous SCC were identified in 8 patients (median age 34.5 years, range 9-54) treated with chronic voriconazole (median duration 46.5 months, range 13-60). Underlying diagnoses included graft-versus-host disease, HIV, and Wegener granulomatosis. Signs of chronic phototoxicity and accelerated photoaging included erythema, actinic keratoses, and lentigo formation. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the study cannot determine the true population risk of SCC associated with voriconazole therapy. A prospective cohort study is needed. CONCLUSION: A high index of suspicion for photosensitivity and SCC may be warranted with chronic voriconazole use when used in the setting of concurrent immunosuppression.

In vivo photochemical skin micronucleus test using a sunlight simulator: detection of 8-methoxypsoralen and benzo[a]pyrene in hairless mice.

Evaluating in vivo photochemical genotoxicity (photogenotoxicity) or photochemical carcinogenicity (photocarcinogenicity) in the skin that is actually exposed to light is important for estimating the risk of human exposure to chemicals under sunlight. With regard to the skin micronucleus test, Nishikawa et al. developed a reliable technique that is simple and in which the negative control has a stable background. In the present study, we applied 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) to the backs of hairless mice and subjected the mice to irradiation by a sunlight simulator in order to investigate whether this test can detect photogenotoxicity of these chemicals. In the treatment with 8-MOP [0.00075% and 0.0015% (w/v)], a significant increase was observed in the frequency of micronucleated cells only under light irradiation using the sunlight simulator. At a high chemical dose, the frequency of micronucleated cells increased from 48h after the treatment, peaked at 96h, and then decreased at 168h. Furthermore, at 96h with the high dose under light irradiation, we frequently observed cells with nuclear buds. In the treatment with B[a]P [first experiment: 0.025% and 0.05% (w/v); second experiment: 0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.02% (w/v)], a significant increase was observed in the frequency of micronucleated cells at skin-irritating doses [0.01%, 0.02%, 0.025%, and 0.05% (w/v)] at 72 or 96h after the treatment only under light irradiation using the sunlight simulator. In conclusion, photogenotoxicity of 8-MOP and B[a]P was detected in the in vivo photochemical skin micronucleus study.