Lichen Sclerosus: A Survey of Diagnosis and Management Among Pediatric Dermatologists and Gynecologists.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic condition that warrants close follow-up due to the risk of scarring. The optimal long-term management of pediatric vulvar and perianal lichen sclerosus (PVPLS) is unknown. This study aimed to identify diagnostic, treatment, and maintenance regimens among pediatric dermatologists and pediatric/adolescent gynecologists, as well as assess provider confidence and desire for guidance on long-term PVPLS management. METHODS: A cross-sectional 35-question survey was administered through the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (NASPAG) between 7/13/2021 and 8/30/2021 to ascertain PVPLS diagnostic and management regimens. RESULTS: Most responders were attending-level pediatric/adolescent gynecologists (46%) and pediatric dermatologists (41%). Although 85% of participants felt completely or very confident in diagnosing PVPLS, the majority (86%) desired further management guidelines. While the initial treatment was similar among providers, maintenance regimens and follow-up varied considerably, with only 42% recommending lifelong monitoring despite potential persistence into adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: While initial treatment was similar among practitioners, there was variation by specialty in subsequent management and a lack of uniformity in long-term follow-up. Additional studies are needed to clarify the optimal management of PVPLS and to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding long-term follow-up.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):450-455.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8084.

Early diagnosis of melanoma: a randomized trial assessing the impact of the transmission of photographs taken with a smartphone from the general practitioner to the dermatologist on the time to dermatological consultation.

BACKGROUND: Difficulty obtaining a dermatological consultation is an obstacle to the early diagnosis of melanoma. On the one hand, patients survival depends on the lesion thickness at the time of diagnosis. On the other hand, dermatologists treat many patients with benign lesions. Optimizing patient care pathways is a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the e-mail transmission of photographs of suspected melanoma lesions between general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists reduces the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately require resection. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled study in primary care involving 51 French GPs between April 2017 and August 2019. A total of 250 patients referred to a dermatologist for a suspected melanoma lesion were included GPs were randomized to either the smartphone arm or the usual care arm. In the smartphone arm, the GPs referred patients to the dermatologist by sending 2 photographs of the suspicious lesion using their smartphone. The dermatologist then had to set up an appointment at an appropriate time. In the usual care arm, GPs referred patients to a dermatologist according to their usual practice. The primary outcome was the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose lesion ultimately required resection. RESULTS: 57 GPs volunteered were randomized (27 to the smartphone arm, and 30 to the usual care arm). A total of 125 patients were included in each arm (mean age: 49.8 years; 53% women) and followed 8 months. Twenty-three dermatologists participated in the study. The time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesion required resection was 56.5 days in the smartphone arm and 63.7 days in the usual care arm (mean adjusted time reduction: -18.5 days, 95% CI [-74.1;23.5], p = .53). CONCLUSIONS: The e-mail transmission of photographs from GPs to dermatologists did not improve the dermatological management of patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately required resection. Further research is needed to validate quality criteria that might be useful for tele-expertise in dermatology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number NCT03137511 (May 2, 2017).

Treatment satisfaction in adults with atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional, population-based study examining patient and physician perspectives in the US.

Studies examining the real-world treatment satisfaction in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) and the physicians who treat adults with AD are scarce. We sought to characterize treatment satisfaction of adults with AD and physicians' perceived patient satisfaction with AD treatment. We performed a cross-sectional study of adults > = 18 years of age (modified AD UK Working Party Criteria, age onset < = 18 [N = 767]) with AD and a parallel-physician survey among allergists/immunologists [N = 148], dermatologists [N = 149] and primary care medicine [N = 104]. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with patient treatment satisfaction (PTS) or physician-perceived patient treatment satisfaction (pPTS). Factors associated with increased PTS included female, older age, and receiving a written eczema action plan (EAP). Severe AD, itch, pain, and insomnia, greater impact on partner relationships, feeling not adequately informed about AD causes, and being separated, never married, or living with a partner was associated with less PTS. From the physician's perspective, mild AD and development of EAP was associated with increase pPTS, whereas being in practice longer was associated with less pPTS. Limitations include the potential for misclassification of AD and the inability to match AD patients to individual physicians. Recognizing which factors are associated with treatment satisfaction can help inform counseling and decision-making strategies, including the use of an eczema action plan, and support patient-physician outcomes alignment.

Contraceptive counseling for iPLEDGE and its burden on dermatologists.

Since 2006, iPLEDGE, a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS), has attempted to prevent fetal exposures in people taking isotretinoin through contraceptive requirements and regular pregnancy testing. There has been criticism of iPLEDGE's requirements, results, and accessibility. iPLEDGE has placed significant burdens on physicians, patients, and administrative staff. Some level of burden is acceptable to prevent fetal exposures, but iPLEDGE burdens are so strenuous that physicians may choose not to prescribe isotretinoin because of them. There are several evidence-based adaptations that iPLEDGE and physicians can enact to improve the isotretinoin experience. First, physicians can practice shared-decision making in contraceptive counseling and educate patients on long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) to improve the counseling process and outcomes. Second, physicians can take advantage of the reimbursed iPLEDGE contraceptive counseling sessions and refer patients accordingly. Finally, iPLEDGE should recognize the variation in efficacy among contraceptives. Specifically, LARCs and permanent surgical sterilization should be exempt from certain iPLEDGE requirements such as monthly pregnancy testing and attestations. iPLEDGE should work with dermatologists for the continual improvement of iPLEDGE. Communication, repetitive reassessment, and subsequent adaptations will result in better care for patients requiring isotretinoin.

Dermatology workforce projections in the United States, 2021 to 2036.

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing imbalance between supply of dermatologists and demand for dermatologic care. To best address physician shortages, it is important to delineate supply and demand patterns in the dermatologic workforce. The goal of this study was to explore dermatology supply and demand over time. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of workforce supply and demand projections for dermatologists from 2021 to 2036 using data from the Health Workforce Simulation Model from the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. Estimates for total workforce supply and demand were summarized in aggregate and stratified by rurality. Scenarios with status quo demand and improved access were considered. RESULTS: Projected total supply showed a 12.45% increase by 2036. Total demand increased 12.70% by 2036 in the status quo scenario. In the improved access scenario, total supply was inadequate for total demand in any year, lagging by 28% in 2036. Metropolitan areas demonstrated a relative supply surplus up to 2036; nonmetropolitan areas had at least a 157% excess in demand throughout the study period. In 2021 adequacy was 108% and 39% adequacy for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, respectively; these differences were projected to continue through 2036. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the dermatology physician workforce is inadequate to meet the demand for dermatologic services in nonmetropolitan areas. Furthermore, improved access to dermatologic care would bolster demand and especially exacerbate workforce inadequacy in nonmetropolitan areas. Continued efforts are needed to address health inequities and ensure access to quality dermatologic care for all.

Evaluating the Cost Burden of Alopecia Areata Treatment: A Comprehensive Review for Dermatologists.

Alopecia areata (AA) is managed with prolonged medical treatments and cosmetic therapies, whose cost can be burdensome. We sought to identify the costs of AA treatment and consolidate the available data for the practicing dermatologist by performing a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE. Ten studies including approximately 16,000 patients with AA across a range of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence were included. Studies showed that despite the limited efficacy of many AA therapies, patients incurred substantial expenses to manage their AA.

EDUCATION FROM DERMATOLOGISTS: THE SIMULTANEOUSLY DEVELOPMENT OF 16 KERATINOCYTIC CANCERS AFTER USE OF METFORMIN IN COMBINATION WITH LOSARTAN/ HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE, METOPROLOL AND NIFEDIPINE- IMPORTANT LINKS TO DRUG RELATED (PHOTO)-NITROSO-CARCINOGENESIS AND ONCOPHARMACOGENESIS.

Oncopharmacogenesis and Drug-Induced Skin cancer related Nitrosogenesis are newly introduced concepts in the medical literature that owe their genesis or presence to the carcinogens/ mutagens, also known as nitrosamines/NDSRIs, which are present in a heterogeneous class of drugs. The contribution to the origin of these 2 concepts is entirely due to 1) the functions and efficacy of FDA in terms of control and identification of these carcinogens, and 2) the establishment of clinicopathological correlations by the dermatologists, occurring during drug intake. According to recent FDA data, the concentration of NDMA in just one metformin tablet could be up to more than 5-fold increased. The intake of 3 to 6 tablets per day should result in a carcinogen intake that is 15 to 30 times elevated within the day and within the monomedication alone. It is these circumstances that paraphrase/ ˝betonate˝ concepts such as Onco-Pharmacogenesis and Drug-mediated Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer. Although not officially declared, these mutagens are present and have been in forced tolerance mode for the last 30-40 years. And after their intake, multiple cancers have been found to develop. The concomitant use of other nitrosamine-contaminated drugs such as losartan/hydrochlorothiazide, metoprolol and nefidipine should certainly not be surprising when it could also be associated with the development of exactly 16 keratinocytic tumours as in the case presented by us. Recent evidence in medical literature has linked the nitrosamine N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR) with the direct development of its subsequent mutagenic action in rodents following irradiation with UVA. This fact leaves open the question of the potentially available photocarcinogenic action of the other nitrosamines in humans found in medicinal preparations. This is what necessitates a clarification of the concept of Photo-Nitroso-Carcinogenesis/ Oncogenesis in humans and its relationship to skin cancer. The overlap of the mutational patterns of some of the nitrosamine-induced mutations in target genes such as p53 and RAS oncogenes, with those of UV light-induced mutations - or practically the same ones mentioned above, suggest a possible significant role of the Drug-Induced Photo-Nitroso-Carcinogenesis of keratinocyte cancer in the context of Onco-Pharmacogenesis. Future analyses should focus on elucidating the photocarcinogenic effect of nitrosamines in drug preparations and differentiating Skin cancer Nitrosogenesis from ˝pure˝ Photo-Carcinogenesis and Nitroso-Photo-Carcinogenesis. The localization of the tumors in the area of the UV-exposed sites within the potential/actual contamination of the 4 preparations (simultaneously) in the described patient are indicative of a possible pathogenetic influence in the context of the already mentioned Nitroso-(Photo)carcinogenesis. Polycontamination of polymedication remains a so far unresolvable problem.

Comparison of visual diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists practicing in Germany in patients with light skin and skin of color.

Visual clinical diagnosis of dermatoses in people of color (PoC) is a considerable challenge in daily clinical practice and a potential cause of misdiagnosis in this patient cohort. The study aimed to determine the difference in visual diagnostic skills of dermatologists practicing in Germany in patients with light skin (Ls) and patients with skin of color (SoC) to identify a potential need for further education. From April to June 2023, German dermatologists were invited to complete an online survey with 24 patient photographs depicting 12 skin diseases on both Ls and SoC. The study's primary outcomes were the number of correctly rated photographs and the participants' self-assessed certainty about the suspected visual diagnosis in Ls compared to SoC. The final analysis included surveys from a total of 129 dermatologists (47.8% female, mean age: 39.5 years). Participants were significantly more likely to correctly identify skin diseases by visual diagnostics in patients with Ls than in patients with SoC (72.1% vs. 52.8%, p ≤ 0.001, OR 2.28). Additionally, they expressed higher confidence in their diagnoses for Ls than for SoC (73.9 vs. 61.7, p ≤ 0.001). Therefore, further specialized training seems necessary to improve clinical care of dermatologic patients with SoC.

Dermatologists' Perspectives on Biosimilars.

BACKGROUND: Biosimilars are biologic agents the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has deemed to have no clinical difference from their reference biologics. In dermatology,  biosimilars are approved for the treatment of psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. Although dermatologists are high prescribers of biologics, they are more reluctant to prescribe biosimilars than other specialists. This survey-based study sought to characterize dermatologists’ current perspectives on biosimilars.  Methods: A 27-question survey was distributed via email to dermatologists between September and October of 2022.  Results: Twenty percent of respondents would not prescribe a biosimilar for an FDA-approved indication. When asked about the greatest barriers to biosimilar adoption, 61% had concerns about biosimilar safety and efficacy, 24% reported uncertainty about state laws for interchangeability and substitutions, and 20% had concerns about biosimilar safety without concerns about efficacy. Thirty-five percent of respondents felt moderately or extremely knowledgeable about biosimilar interchangeability.  Conclusion: Biosimilars are safe and effective for treating approved dermatological conditions and may lower patient costs compared to their reference products. Patients are not always offered biosimilar therapy as an option, which may be due to unfamiliarity among dermatologists.  This survey suggests a need for more research and educational initiatives, such as modules and workshops that focus on biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability guidelines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):doi:10.36849/JDD.7755.

Comparing preferences for skin cancer screening: AI-enabled app vs dermatologist.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Skin cancer is a major public health issue. While self-examinations and professional screenings are recommended, they are rarely performed. Mobile health (mHealth) apps utilising artificial intelligence (AI) for skin cancer screening offer a potential solution to aid self-examinations; however, their uptake is low. Therefore, the aim of this research was to examine provider and user characteristics influencing people's decisions to seek skin cancer screening performed by a mHealth app or a dermatologist. METHODS: Two forced-choice conjoint experiments with Nmain = 1591 and Nreplication = 308 participants from the United States were conducted online to investigate preferences for screening providers. In addition to the provider type (mHealth app vs dermatologist), the following provider attributes were manipulated: costs, expertise, privacy policy, and result details. Subsequently, a questionnaire assessed various user characteristics, including demographics, attitudes toward AI technology and medical mistrust. RESULTS: Outcomes were consistent across the two studies. The provider type was the most influential factor, with the dermatologist being selected more often than the mHealth app. Cost, expertise, and privacy policy also significantly impacted decisions. Demographic subgroup analyses showed rather consistent preference trends across various age, gender, and ethnicity groups. Individuals with greater medical mistrust were more inclined to choose the mHealth app. Trust, accuracy, and quality ratings were higher for the dermatologist, whether selected or not. CONCLUSION: Our results offer valuable insights for technology developers, healthcare providers, and policymakers, contributing to unlocking the potential of skin cancer screening apps in bridging healthcare gaps in underserved communities.

Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Long-Term Antibiotic Prescriptions for Acne Treatment.

Importance: Dermatologists prescribe more oral antibiotics per clinician than clinicians in any other specialty. Despite clinical guidelines that recommend limitation of long-term oral antibiotic treatments for acne to less than 3 months, there is little evidence to guide the design and implementation of an antibiotic stewardship program in clinical practice. Objective: To identify salient barriers and facilitators to long-term antibiotic prescriptions for acne treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study assessed data collected from stakeholders (including dermatologists, infectious disease physicians, dermatology resident physicians, and nonphysician clinicians) via an online survey and semistructured video interviews between March and August 2021. Data analyses were performed from August 12, 2021, to January 20, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Online survey and qualitative video interviews developed with the Theoretical Domains Framework. Thematic analyses were used to identify salient themes on barriers and facilitators to long-term antibiotic prescriptions for acne treatment. Results: Among 30 participants (14 [47%] males and 16 [53%] females) who completed the study requirements and were included in the analysis, knowledge of antibiotic guideline recommendations was high and antibiotic stewardship was believed to be a professional responsibility. Five salient themes were to be affecting long-term antibiotic prescriptions: perceived lack of evidence to justify change in dermatologic practice, difficulty navigating patient demands and satisfaction, discomfort with discussing contraception, iPLEDGE-related barriers, and the absence of an effective system to measure progress on antibiotic stewardship. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study indicate that multiple salient factors affect long-term antibiotic prescribing practices for acne treatment. These factors should be considered in the design and implementation of any future outpatient antibiotic stewardship program for clinical dermatology.

Improving access to dermatology specialist care: review of a dermatologist- and general practitioner-integrated clinic model.

Introduction This study presents an innovative model of integrated dermatology service delivery. Kauri HealthCare (KHC) is a general practice serving around 19 000 patients in Palmerston North, New Zealand. A 'mini clinic' is provided by an on-site dermatologist that is available for patients of KHC. Referring practitioners are required to attend with the patient to present their case and seek dermatologist input. This allows for patients to receive a specialist opinion, as well as for the referrer to receive practical and academic teaching, record findings, and arrange any further investigations, follow-up, or management. Aim To describe the nature of patient presentations and clinical outcomes of a novel dermatologist-general practitioner integrated clinic based in a provincial healthcare practice. Methods Descriptive analysis of all referrals to the Kauri HealthCare dermatology mini clinic from April 2017 to December 2022. Results During the study period, 964 diagnoses were recorded across 806 patients booked into the mini clinic. The most common presenting conditions were: (1) eczema; (2) psoriasis; (3) actinic keratoses; (4) naevi; and (5) seborrheic keratosis. Practitioners sought dermatology opinion on the diagnosis and/or management of skin conditions. Further referral to secondary care was not required for 86% of patients. Discussion Improvements could be made to better serve those of Maori and Pacific ethnicity, or living in high socioeconomic deprivation. Results indicate where teaching could be prioritised for practitioners, postgraduates, and medical students. Overall, this is an innovative clinic model, which seeks to provide equitable care, medical education, and collaboration between primary and secondary services.

Monkeypox: What the Dermatologist Needs to Know.

Monkeypox, an endemic disease in some African countries, has provoked public health activeness on a global scale that even the World Health Organization (WHO), invoking international health regulations, declared it a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). The WHO called attention of member states to exert maximum surveillance over the disease, its patients, and contact persons in order to standardize control measures. A need was directed to provide complete knowledge about the disease, allowing the administration of prior diagnoses as well as isolation and more effective epidemiologic control measures. An updated review on monkeypox emphasized upon having the fundamental aspects of the lesions caused by the disease, and appropriate management of patients upon clinical and epidemiologic evaluation.