Analyzing diversity, equity, and inclusion content on dermatology fellowship program websites.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have garnered increasing attention within medical education as there have been increased efforts to diversify the physician workforce among medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings. One way in which programs can improve their DEI initiatives and attract a more diverse pool of applicants is through DEI content on their graduate medical education websites. Prior studies characterizing the content and prevalence of DEI material on residency webpages have shown that dermatology residencies have relatively low levels of DEI content on their websites in which almost ¾ of all programs having no DEI content. Little is known, however, if similar findings are to be expected for the three main dermatology subspecialty fellowship program webpages: Dermatopathology, Pediatric Dermatology, and Micrographic Surgery and Dermatology Oncology. Fellowship programs were identified using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's online database of fellowship programs. Programs were evaluated on a standardized scoring system for five equally weighted criteria: fellowship-specific DEI webpage, DEI commitment statement, DEI initiatives (summer research opportunities for under-represented minorities, DEI council, etc.), link to the institution's DEI homepage, and information about bias training. The mean score among all programs was 12.5. Pediatric dermatology ranked the highest among all specialties, while Mohs ranked the lowest. A link to the institution's DEI homepage was the most prevalent factor accounting for 42.1% of all programs collected, whereas information about bias training and fellowship-associated DEI webpage were the least prevalent. The results of this study reveal an overall lack of DEI content across all dermatology subspecialties' webpages and represent an actionable area of improvement for fellowship directors to increase their DEI efforts to attract a diverse pool of applicants to their program.

Revolutionizing dermatology: harnessing mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and exosomes in 3D platform for skin regeneration.

Contemporary trends reveal an escalating interest in regenerative medicine-based interventions for addressing refractory skin defects. Conventional wound healing treatments, characterized by high costs and limited efficacy, necessitate a more efficient therapeutic paradigm to alleviate the economic and psychological burdens associated with chronic wounds. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) constitute cell-based therapies, whereas cell-free approaches predominantly involve the utilization of MSC-derived extracellular vesicles or exosomes, both purportedly safe and effective. Exploiting the impact of MSCs by paracrine signaling, exosomes have emerged as a novel avenue capable of positively impacting wound healing and skin regeneration. MSC-exosomes confer several advantages, including the facilitation of angiogenesis, augmentation of cell proliferation, elevation of collagen production, and enhancement of tissue regenerative capacity. Despite these merits, challenges persist in clinical applications due to issues such as poor targeting and facile removal of MSC-derived exosomes from skin wounds. Addressing these concerns, a three-dimensional (3D) platform has been implemented to emend exosomes, allowing for elevated levels, and constructing more stable granules possessing distinct therapeutic capabilities. Incorporating biomaterials to encapsulate MSC-exosomes emerges as a favorable approach, concentrating doses, achieving intended therapeutic effectiveness, and ensuring continual release. While the therapeutic potential of MSC-exosomes in skin repair is broadly recognized, their application with 3D biomaterial scenarios remains underexplored. This review synthesizes the therapeutic purposes of MSCs and exosomes in 3D for the skin restoration, underscoring their promising role in diverse dermatological conditions. Further research may establish MSCs and their exosomes in 3D as a viable therapeutic option for various skin conditions.

Gender Parity Analysis of the Editorial Boards of Influential Dermatology Journals: Cross-Sectional Study.

This study underscores the persistent underrepresentation of women in academic dermatology leadership positions by examining the gender composition of editorial boards across top dermatology journals, emphasizing the urgent need for proactive strategies to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Beyond graduation: a survey study exploring drivers of alumni contributions to dermatology residencies.

Philanthropic donations are an increasingly important funding source for academic medical centers. Minimal published data is available about factors that influence alumni donations to residency programs. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a single-site dermatology and combined internal medicine-dermatology residency programs to assess factors impacting alumni donations. Donors tended to have graduated less recently (only 20% graduating after 2010) and practice in the same region of their alma mater (50%). Respondents preferred funds be allocated to resident needs over needs of medical students. Strategically engaging senior alumni and offering fund allocation opportunities could increase philanthropy, with alumni perceptions of the residency program warranting further investigation for their impact on donation decisions.