Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.862
Filter
1.
Glob Health Action ; 17(1): 2341521, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693861

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an abnormal glucose metabolism diagnosed during pregnancy that can have serious adverse consequences for mother and child. GDM is an exceptional health condition, as its management serves not only as treatment but also as prevention, reducing the risk of future diabetes in mother and child. OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study aimed to explore how pregnant women experience and respond to GDM, focusing particularly on the role of the family environment in shaping women's experiences. METHODS: The research was carried out in Vietnam's Thái Bình province in April-May 2023. We conducted in-depth ethnographic interviews with 21 women with GDM, visiting them in their homes. Our theoretical starting point was phenomenological anthropology, and the data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: At the centre of women's experiences was the contrast between GDM as a biomedical and a social condition. Whereas GDM was biomedically diagnosed and managed in the healthcare system, it was often deemed insignificant or non-existent by family members. This made GDM a biomedically present but socially absent health condition. This paradox posed challenges to women's GDM self-care, placing them in pioneering social positions. CONCLUSIONS: The biomedical presence yet social absence of GDM turned women into pioneers at biomedical, digital, epidemiological, and family frontiers. This article calls for appreciation of pregnant women's pioneering roles and for health systems action to involve women and families in the development of GDM policies and programmes at a time of sweeping global health changes.


Main findings: Vietnamese women's experiences of gestational diabetes were affected by social splits between clinic and home; between biomedical and family worlds.Added knowledge: Gestational diabetes places pregnant women in Northern Vietnam in pioneering roles on biomedical, digital, epidemiological, and family frontiers.Global health impact for policy and action: Pregnant women should be involved in the development of policies and programmes addressing gestational diabetes, with particular attention to the connections between clinical and family worlds.


Subject(s)
Anthropology, Cultural , Diabetes, Gestational , Qualitative Research , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/psychology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , Vietnam , Adult , Pregnant Women/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Young Adult , Self Care/psychology
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 346, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The implementation of universal screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is challenged by several factors key amongst which is limited resources, hence the continued reliance on risk factor-based screening. Effective identification of high-risk women early in pregnancy may enable preventive intervention. This study aimed at developing a GDM prediction model based on maternal clinical risk factors that are easily assessable in the first trimester of pregnancy in a population of Nigerian women. METHODS: This was a multi-hospital prospective observational cohort study of 253 consecutively selected pregnant women from which maternal clinical data was collected at 8-12 weeks gestational age. Diagnosis of GDM was made via a one-step 75-gram Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks of gestation. A GDM prediction model and nomogram based on selected maternal clinical risk factors was developed using multiple logistic regression analysis, and its performance was assessed by Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis. Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 and Python programming language (version 3.0). RESULTS: Increasing maternal age, higher body mass index (BMI), a family history of diabetes mellitus in first-degree relative and previous history of foetal macrosomia were the major predictors of GDM. The model equation was: LogitP = 6.358 - 0.066 × Age - 0.075 × First trimester BMI - 1.879 × First-degree relative with diabetes mellitus - 0.522 × History of foetal macrosomia. It had an area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.751-0.877; p-value < 0.001), and at a predicted probability threshold of 0.745, it had a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 74.5%. CONCLUSION: This first trimester prediction model reliably identifies women at high risk for GDM development in the first trimester, and the nomogram enhances its practical applicability, contributing to improved clinical outcomes in the study population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Glucose Tolerance Test , Nomograms , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Female , Adult , Risk Factors , Prospective Studies , Glucose Tolerance Test/methods , Nigeria/epidemiology , Maternal Age , Body Mass Index , Risk Assessment/methods , ROC Curve , Young Adult , Fetal Macrosomia/epidemiology
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 349, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contemporary estimates of diabetes mellitus (DM) rates in pregnancy are lacking in Canada. Accordingly, this study examined trends in the rates of type 1 (T1DM), type 2 (T2DM) and gestational (GDM) DM in Canada over a 15-year period, and selected adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This study used repeated cross-sectional data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) hospitalization discharge abstract database (DAD). Maternal delivery records were linked to their respective birth records from 2006 to 2019. The prevalence of T1DM, T2DM and GDM were calculated, including relative changes over time, assessed by a Cochrane-Armitage test. Also assessed were differences between provinces and territories in the prevalence of DM. RESULTS: Over the 15-year study period, comprising 4,320,778 hospital deliveries in Canada, there was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of GDM and T1DM and T2DM. Compared to pregnancies without DM, all pregnancies with any form of DM had higher rates of hypertension and Caesarian delivery, and also adverse infant outcomes, including major congenital anomalies, preterm birth and large-for-gestational age birthweight. CONCLUSION: Among 4.3 million pregnancies in Canada, there has been a rise in the prevalence of DM. T2DM and GDM are expected to increase further as more overweight women conceive in Canada.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetes, Gestational , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Canada/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Prevalence , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , Premature Birth/epidemiology
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410279, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722629

ABSTRACT

Importance: Gestational diabetes is a type 2 diabetes risk indicator, and recurrence further augments risk. In women with a single occurrence across 2 pregnancies, it is unclear whether first- vs second-pregnancy gestational diabetes differ in terms of risk. Objective: To compare the hazards of incident diabetes among those with gestational diabetes in the first, in the second, and in both pregnancies with women without gestational diabetes in either. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study with cohort inception from April 1, 1990, to December 31, 2012. Follow-up was April 1, 1990, to April 1, 2019. Participants were mothers with 2 singleton deliveries between April 1, 1990, and December 31, 2012, without diabetes before or between pregnancies, who were listed in public health care insurance administrative databases and birth, stillbirth, and death registries in Quebec, Canada. Data were analyzed from July to December 2023. Exposure: Gestational diabetes occurrence(s) across 2 pregnancies. Main outcomes and measures: Incident diabetes from the second delivery until a third pregnancy, death, or the end of the follow-up period, whichever occurred first. Results: The 431 980 women with 2 singleton deliveries studied had a mean (SD) age of 30.1 (4.5) years at second delivery, with a mean (SD) of 2.8 (1.5) years elapsed between deliveries; 373 415 (86.4%) were of European background, and 78 770 (18.2%) were at the highest quintile of material deprivation. Overall, 10 920 women (2.5%) had gestational diabetes in their first pregnancy, 16 145 (3.7%) in their second, and 8255 (1.9%) in both (12 205 incident diabetes events; median [IQR] follow-up 11.5 [5.3-19.4] years). First pregnancy-only gestational diabetes increased hazards 4.35-fold (95% CI, 4.06-4.67), second pregnancy-only increased hazards 7.68-fold (95% CI, 7.31-8.07), and gestational diabetes in both pregnancies increased hazards 15.8-fold (95% CI, 15.0-16.6). Compared with first pregnancy-only gestational diabetes, second pregnancy-only gestational diabetes increased hazards by 76% (95% CI, 1.63-1.91), while gestational diabetes in both pregnancies increased it 3.63-fold (95% CI, 3.36-3.93). Conclusions and relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of nearly half a million women with 2 singleton pregnancies, both the number and ordinal pregnancy of any gestational diabetes occurrence increased diabetes risk. These considerations offer greater nuance than an ever or never gestational diabetes dichotomy.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Quebec/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Risk Factors
5.
J Diabetes ; 16(5): e13559, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708437

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore associations between type and number of abnormal glucose values on antenatal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with postpartum diabetes in South Asian women diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GDM) using International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. METHODS: This post-hoc evaluation of the Lifestyle Intervention IN Gestational Diabetes (LIVING) study, a randomized controlled trial, was conducted among women with GDM in the index pregnancy, across 19 centers in Bangladesh, India, and Sri Lanka. Postpartum diabetes (outcome) was defined on OGTT, using American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria. RESULTS: We report data on 1468 women with GDM, aged 30.9 (5.0) years, and with median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.8 (1.4-2.4) years after childbirth following the index pregnancy. We found diabetes in 213 (14.5%) women with an incidence of 8.7 (7.6-10.0)/100 women-years. The lowest incidence rate was 3.8/100 women years, in those with an isolated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) abnormality, and highest was 19.0/100 women years in participants with three abnormal values. The adjusted hazard ratios for two and three abnormal values compared to one abnormal value were 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.54; p = .005) and 3.56 (95% CI, 2.46-5.16; p < .001) respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for the combined (combination of fasting and postglucose load) abnormalities was 2.61 (95% CI, 1.70-4.00; p < .001), compared to isolated abnormal FPG. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of diabetes varied significantly depending upon the type and number of abnormal values on antenatal OGTT. These data may inform future precision medicine approaches such as risk prediction models in identifying women at higher risk and may guide future targeted interventions.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Diabetes, Gestational , Glucose Tolerance Test , Postpartum Period , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Risk Factors , Incidence , Sri Lanka/epidemiology , India/epidemiology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Prognosis , Follow-Up Studies
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 356, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malaria in pregnancy can have adverse outcomes if untreated. Both malaria and pregnancy are associated with insulin resistance and diabetes. Although malaria is treated prophylactically with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screened for in pregnancy as part a routine antenatal care, their impacts have not been examined in terms of other forms of dysglycaemia. This cross-sectional study examined insulin resistance and its relationship with dysglycaemia and malaria among pregnant women in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH). METHODS: Using a structured questionnaire, demographic and clinical information were obtained from 252 pregnant women aged 18-42 years. Weight and height were measured for computation of body mass index (BMI). Measurement of insulin, lipid profile and glucose were taken under fasting conditions followed by oral glucose tolerant test. Insulin resistance and beta-cell function were assessed by the homeostatic model as malaria was diagnosed by microscopy. RESULTS: The respective prevalence of GDM, gestational glucose intolerance (GGI) and insulin resistance were 0.8% (2/252), 19.44% (49/252) and 56.75% (143/252). No malaria parasite or dyslipidaemia was detected in any of the participants. Apart from BMI that increased across trimesters, no other measured parameter differed among the participants. Junior High School (JHS) education compared with no formal education increased the odds (AOR: 2.53; CI: 1.12-5.71; P = 0.03) but 2nd trimester of pregnancy compared to the 1st decreased the odds (AOR: 0.32; CI: 0.12-0.81; P = 0.02) of having insulin resistance in the entire sample. In a sub-group analysis across trimesters, pregnant women with JHS education in their 3rd trimester had increased odds (AOR: 4.41; CI: 1.25-15.62; P = 0.02) of having insulin resistance. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of GDM and GGI were 0.8% and 19.44% respectively. The odds of insulin resistance increased in pregnant women with JHS education in the 3rd trimester. Appropriate measures are needed to assuage the diabetogenic risk posed by GGI in our setting.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Hospitals, Teaching , Insulin Resistance , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Young Adult , Adolescent , Prevalence , South Africa/epidemiology , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/blood , Body Mass Index , Glucose Intolerance/epidemiology , Glucose Intolerance/blood , Glucose Tolerance Test , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/blood , Educational Status
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 369, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750456

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Given the increasing incidence of negative outcomes during pregnancy, our research team conducted a dose-response systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) consumption and common adverse pregnancy outcomes including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia (PE), preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) infants. UPFs are described as formulations of food substances often modified by chemical processes and then assembled into ready-to-consume hyper-palatable food and drink products using flavors, colors, emulsifiers, and other cosmetic additives. Examples include savory snacks, reconstituted meat products, frozen meals that have already been made, and soft drinks. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed using the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases up to December 2023. We pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our analysis (encompassing 54 studies with 552,686 individuals) revealed a significant association between UPFs intake and increased risks of GDM (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27; I2 = 77.5%; p < 0.001; studies = 44; number of participants = 180,824), PE (RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.59; I2 = 80.0%; p = 0.025; studies = 12; number of participants = 54,955), while no significant relationships were found for PTB, LBW and SGA infants. Importantly, a 100 g increment in UPFs intake was related to a 27% increase in GDM risk (RR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.51; I2 = 81.0%; p = 0.007; studies = 9; number of participants = 39,812). The non-linear dose-response analysis further indicated a positive, non-linear relationship between UPFs intake and GDM risk Pnonlinearity = 0.034, Pdose-response = 0.034), although no such relationship was observed for PE (Pnonlinearity = 0.696, Pdose-response = 0.812). CONCLUSION: In summary, both prior to and during pregnancy, chronic and excessive intake of UPFs is associated with an increased risk of GDM and PE. However, further observational studies, particularly among diverse ethnic groups with precise UPFs consumption measurement tools, are imperative for a more comprehensive understanding.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Fast Foods , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Fast Foods/statistics & numerical data , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Food Handling , Food, Processed
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 361, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The influence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on postpartum cardiometabolic indicators is primarily restricted to glucose and lipid metabolism, however the indicators for liver and kidney function have been rarely explored, and the role of the third-trimester inflammatory factors in these associations has never been investigated. METHODS: Based on the Ma'anshan birth cohort (MABC), women with or without GDM history were selected and invited to participate in a 6-year postpartum follow-up. The fasting blood samples were collected to measure 16 comprehensive metabolic indicators during a 6-year postpartum follow-up: fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), uric acid (UA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (SCR), etc. Seven inflammatory factors, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, and IL-17 A, were measured with serum samples collected during the third trimester of pregnancy. Linear regression models were used to analyze the associations between GDM and 6-year postpartum metabolic indicators, GDM and third-trimester inflammatory factors, and the third-trimester inflammatory factors and 6-year postpartum metabolic indicators. Mediating and moderating effect analyses were further performed to explore if the third-trimester inflammatory factors mediate or modify the association between GDM and postpartum cardiometabolic indicators. RESULTS: From July 2021 to August 2022, 307 participants have been followed up, with 99 women with a prior GDM history. Compared with those without GDM, individuals with a prior history of GDM had significantly elevated levels of FPG (ß = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.62, PFDR < 0.001), HbA1c (ß = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.34, PFDR = 0.009), TyG (ß = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.37, PFDR = 0.024) at 6 years postpartum, and the association between GDM and SCR (ß = 2.43, 95% CI: 0.02 to 4.85, PFDR = 0.144) reached nominal significance level. GDM history was associated with a decreased level of third-trimester IL-17 A (ß = -0.58, 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.18, PFDR = 0.035). No significant association between third-trimester inflammatory factors and 6-year postpartum metabolic indicators was observed. And no mediating or moderating effect of third-trimester inflammatory factors was observed in those associations. CONCLUSION: A prior history of GDM was significantly associated with elevated FPG, HbA1c, and TyG in women at 6 years postpartum, whereas third-trimester inflammatory factors had no role in mediating or moderating these associations.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Diabetes, Gestational , Glycated Hemoglobin , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Pregnancy Trimester, Third/blood , Adult , Postpartum Period/blood , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Inflammation/blood , Uric Acid/blood , Triglycerides/blood , Cholesterol/blood , Follow-Up Studies , Creatinine/blood , Blood Urea Nitrogen
10.
Nutrients ; 16(9)2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732598

ABSTRACT

Background: Breastfeeding appears to reduce the risk of childhood overweight/obesity. However, it remains unclear whether this protective effect persists among high-risk populations. This study aims to investigate the association of breastfeeding with the risk of overweight/obesity in early childhood and whether this association is altered by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or size at birth. Methods: Feeding practices during the first 12 months of age and weight and length at 12-36 months of age were collected. Full breastfeeding includes exclusive and predominant breastfeeding. Children with body mass index (BMI) values greater than 1 standard deviation from the mean of sex- and age-specific BMI were classified as overweight/obese. Multiple generalized estimating equations models were applied to analyze the associations of full breastfeeding duration with overweight/obesity risk. Results: Among all participants (n = 9329), infants with a longer full-breastfeeding duration had a reduced risk of overweight/obesity in early childhood compared with those breastfed for less than one month. Infants exposed to GDM and those born large for gestational age (LGA) had a higher risk of overweight/obesity in early childhood. Among infants of mothers with GDM (n = 1748), infants with full breastfeeding for greater than 6 months (aOR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.78) showed a decreased risk of overweight/obesity in early childhood compared with those breastfed for less than one month. Among LGA infants (n = 1279), infants with full breastfeeding for 3-5 months (aOR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.76) and greater than 6 months (aOR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.88) showed a decreased risk of overweight/obesity in early childhood. Similar results were observed among LGA infants of mothers with GDM. Conclusions: Initiating and prolonging breastfeeding would reduce the risk of overweight/obesity in early childhood, and LGA infants and infants born to mothers with GDM would experience greater benefits.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight , Breast Feeding , Diabetes, Gestational , Pediatric Obesity , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Diabetes, Gestational/etiology , Female , Pregnancy , Infant , Pediatric Obesity/epidemiology , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Pediatric Obesity/etiology , Male , Child, Preschool , Infant, Newborn , Risk Factors , Body Mass Index , Adult , Overweight/epidemiology
11.
Nutrients ; 16(9)2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732620

ABSTRACT

Understanding how maternal micronutrient intake and dietary habits impact gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is crucial. Data from 797 pregnant women were prospectively analyzed to assess GDM status with the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Nutritional intake was evaluated using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) across two periods: Period A, covering 6 months before pregnancy, and Period B, from pregnancy onset to mid-gestation (24 weeks). Micronutrient intakes were compared against the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) dietary reference values (DRVs) and were used to estimate the mean adequacy ratio (MAR) to assess dietary adequacy. GDM was diagnosed in 14.7% (n = 117) of women with the characteristics of a higher mean maternal age (MA) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). Out of the 13 vitamins assessed, biotin, folate, niacin, and pantothenic acid were found significantly higher in the GDM group, as did iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, and zinc from the 10 minerals. The results were influenced by the timing of the assessment. Importantly, MAR was higher during pregnancy and was found to increase the risk of GDM by 1% (95%CI: 1, 1.02). A sensitivity analysis revealed that reducing MAR significantly raised the GDM risk by 68% (95%CI: 1.02, 2.79). No association was revealed between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) and GDM risk. These findings highlight areas for further investigation into whether dietary modifications involving these specific micronutrients could effectively influence GDM outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Micronutrients , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/etiology , Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Greece/epidemiology , Micronutrients/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Adult , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Risk Factors , Glucose Tolerance Test , Nutritional Status , Body Mass Index , Feeding Behavior
12.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302208, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814912

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Red and processed meat is considered risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but the evidence is inconclusive. We aimed to examine the association between red and processed meat intake and odds of GDM among South Asian and White European women living in Canada. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of pregnant women from two birth cohorts: SouTh Asian biRth cohorT (START; n = 976) and Family Atherosclerosis Monitoring In earLY life (FAMILY; n = 581). Dietary intake was assessed using a validated 169-item semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between gestational diabetes and: 1) total red and processed meat; 2) unprocessed red meat; 3) processed meat and GDM after adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 241 GDM cases in START and 91 in FAMILY. The median total red and processed meat intake were 1.5 g/d (START) and 52.8 g/d (FAMILY). In START, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) showed neither lower nor higher intakes of unprocessed red meat (p-trend = 0.68), processed meat (p-trend = 0.90), or total red and processed meat (p-trend = 0.44), were associated with increased odds of GDM, when compared with medium intake. Similar results were observed in FAMILY except for processed meat intake [OR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.47-1.91), for medium versus low and OR = 1.51 (95% CI 0.77-2.29) for medium versus high; p-trend = 0.18] after adjusting for additional dietary factors such as the diet quality score, total fiber, saturated fat and glycemic load. CONCLUSION: Medium compared with low or high red and processed meat intake is not associated with GDM in White Europeans and South Asians living in Canada.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Humans , Female , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/etiology , Pregnancy , Canada/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cohort Studies , Red Meat/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Meat Products/adverse effects , Diet/adverse effects
13.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 395, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women with diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) are more likely to have glycaemic levels above the target range, and their babies are thus at higher risk of excessive fetal growth. Shoulder dystocia, defined by failure of spontaneous birth of fetal shoulder after birth of the head requiring obstetric maneuvers, is an obstetric emergency that is strongly associated with DIP and fetal size. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of shoulder dystocia in Aboriginal babies born to mothers with DIP. METHODS: Stratifying by Aboriginal status, characteristics of births complicated by shoulder dystocia in women with and without DIP were compared and incidence and time-trends of shoulder dystocia were described. Compliance with guidelines aiming at preventing shoulder dystocia in women with DIP were compared. Post-logistic regression estimation was used to calculate the population attributable fractions (PAFs) for shoulder dystocia associated with DIP and to estimate probabilities of shoulder dystocia in babies born to mothers with DIP at birthweights > 3 kg. RESULTS: Rates of shoulder dystocia from vaginal births in Aboriginal babies born to mothers with DIP were double that of their non-Aboriginal counterparts (6.3% vs 3.2%, p < 0.001), with no improvement over time. Aboriginal mothers with diabetes whose pregnancies were complicated by shoulder dystocia were more likely to have a history of shoulder dystocia (13.1% vs 6.3%, p = 0.032). Rates of guideline-recommended elective caesarean section in pregnancies with diabetes and birthweight > 4.5 kg were lower in the Aboriginal women (28.6% vs 43.1%, p = 0.004). PAFs indicated that 13.4% (95% CI: 9.7%-16.9%) of shoulder dystocia cases in Aboriginal (2.7% (95% CI: 2.1%-3.4%) in non-Aboriginal) women were attributable to DIP. Probability of shoulder dystocia among babies born to Aboriginal mothers with DIP was higher at birthweights > 3 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Aboriginal mothers with DIP had a higher risk of shoulder dystocia and a stronger association between birthweight and shoulder dystocia. Many cases were recurrent. These factors should be considered in clinical practice and when counselling women.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy in Diabetics , Shoulder Dystocia , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Cohort Studies , Diabetes, Gestational/ethnology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Incidence , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/ethnology , Risk Factors , Shoulder Dystocia/epidemiology , Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791833

ABSTRACT

We used National Birth Defects Prevention Study data to investigate associations between working patterns shortly before and during pregnancy and gestational diabetes and pregnancy-related hypertension. We analyzed working patterns (multiple-job holders, job changers, single-job holders) during the three months before and during pregnancy for 8140 participants who delivered a live-born child without a birth defect. "Multiple-job holders" worked more than one job simultaneously, "job changers" worked more than one job with no overlap, and "single-job holders" (referent) worked one job. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate associations between working pattern and each outcome, adjusting for maternal age and educational attainment at delivery. We explored effect measure modification by household income, peak weekly working hours, and maternal race/ethnicity. Multiple-job holders had higher odds of gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.1) and pregnancy-related hypertension (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.2) compared with single-job holders. Multiple-job holders with a household income of more than 30,000 USD per year, 32-44 peak weekly working hours, and from racial/ethnic minority groups had higher odds of gestational diabetes compared with single-job holders in respective categories. Detailed occupational information is important for studies of occupation and maternal health.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Adult , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Employment/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
15.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11960, 2024 05 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796580

ABSTRACT

To investigate neonatal injuries, morbidities and risk factors related to vaginal deliveries. This retrospective, descriptive study identified 3500 patients who underwent vaginal delivery between 2020 and 2022. Demographic data, neonatal injuries, complications arising from vaginal delivery and pertinent risk factors were documented. Neonatal injuries and morbidities were prevalent in cases of assisted vacuum delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus class A2 (GDMA2) and pre-eclampsia with severe features. Caput succedaneum and petechiae were observed in 291/3500 cases (8.31%) and 108/3500 cases (3.09%), respectively. Caput succedaneum was associated with multiparity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.57, P < 0.001) and assisted vacuum delivery (AOR 5.18, 95% CI 2.60-10.3, P < 0.001). Cephalohaematoma was linked to GDMA2 (AOR 11.3, 95% CI 2.96-43.2, P < 0.001) and assisted vacuum delivery (AOR 16.5, 95% CI 6.71-40.5, P < 0.001). Scalp lacerations correlated with assisted vacuum and forceps deliveries (AOR 6.94, 95% CI 1.85-26.1, P < 0.004; and AOR 10.5, 95% CI 1.08-102.2, P < 0.042, respectively). Neonatal morbidities were associated with preterm delivery (AOR 3.49, 95% CI 1.39-8.72, P = 0.008), night-time delivery (AOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.63, P = 0.009) and low birth weight (AOR 7.52, 95% CI 3.79-14.9, P < 0.001). Neonatal injuries and morbidities were common in assisted vacuum delivery, maternal GDMA2, pre-eclampsia with severe features, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Cephalohaematoma and scalp lacerations were prevalent in assisted vaginal deliveries. Most morbidities occurred at night.Clinical trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry 20220126004.


Subject(s)
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Birth Injuries/epidemiology , Birth Injuries/etiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/etiology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/etiology , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/etiology
16.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e058625, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803262

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Different diagnostic criteria are used for GDM, and it is not clear how these affect the reported prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This protocol is for a systematic review to describe and compare the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in GDM using the different diagnostic criteria applied in various countries/regions of the world. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be carried out. A comprehensive search of observational studies that report the outcomes of interest to this review from 2010 to 2021 will be conducted. We will search the major electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL and Google Scholar, and screen references of included studies for additional studies. Meta-analyses will be performed, if there is low heterogeneity, and pooled estimates per outcome reported. We will use the bias-adjusted inverse variance heterogeneity model and random effects models, depending on the heterogeneity observed, to pool prevalence estimates and perform subgroup analyses by region, by age group, by diagnostic criteria and by GDM screening method if sufficient data are available. We will also compare the prevalence of adverse outcomes by diagnostic method and report prevalence ratios. We will report 95% confidence estimates for all estimates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as the review uses published data. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020155061.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Pregnancy Outcome , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Female , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Research Design , Prevalence
17.
Yale J Biol Med ; 97(1): 67-72, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38559462

ABSTRACT

Background: Adverse outcomes from gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the mother and newborn are well established. Genetic variants may predict GDM and Artificial Intelligence (AI) can potentially assist with improved screening and early identification in lower resource settings. There is limited information on genetic variants associated with GDM in sub-Saharan Africa and the implementation of AI in GDM screening in sub-Saharan Africa is largely unknown. Methods: We reviewed the literature on what is known about genetic predictors of GDM in sub-Saharan African women. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in GDM predisposition in a sub-Saharan African population. We report on barriers that limit the implementation of AI that could assist with GDM screening and offer possible solutions. Results: In a Black South African cohort, the minor allele of the SNP rs4581569 existing in the PDX1 gene was significantly associated with GDM. We were not able to find any published literature on the implementation of AI to identify women at risk of GDM before second trimester of pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa. Barriers to successful integration of AI into healthcare systems are broad but solutions exist. Conclusions: More research is needed to identify SNPs associated with GDM in sub-Saharan Africa. The implementation of AI and its applications in the field of healthcare in the sub-Saharan African region is a significant opportunity to positively impact early identification of GDM.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/genetics , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Artificial Intelligence , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Risk Assessment
18.
Yale J Biol Med ; 97(1): 49-65, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38559460

ABSTRACT

Objective: to evaluate the effect of prenatal care (PC) on perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: systematic review developed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and conducted through the population, intervention, control, and outcomes (PICO) strategy. Clinical trials and observational studies were selected, with adult pregnant women, single-fetus pregnancy, diagnosis of DM, or gestational DM and who had received PC and/or nutritional therapy (NT). The search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and BIREME databases. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the tools of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-National Institutes of Health (NHLBI-NIH). Results: We identified 5972 records, of which 15 (n=47 420 pregnant women) met the eligibility criteria. The most recurrent outcomes were glycemic control (14 studies; n=9096 participants), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (2; n=39 282), prematurity (6; n=40 163), large for gestational age newborns (4; n=1556), fetal macrosomia (birth weight >4kg) (6; n=2980) and intensive care unit admission (4; n=2022). Conclusions: The findings suggest that PC interferes with the perinatal outcome, being able to reduce the risks of complications associated with this comorbidity through early intervention, especially when the NT is an integral part of this assistance.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Prenatal Care , United States , Adult , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Pregnant Women , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology
19.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 271, 2024 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mild hyperglycaemia is associated with increased birth weight but association with other neonatal outcomes is controversial. We aimed to study neonatal outcomes in untreated mild hyperglycaemia using different oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) thresholds. METHODS: This register-based study included all (n = 4,939) singleton pregnant women participating a 75 g 2-h OGTT in six delivery hospitals in Finland in 2009. Finnish diagnostic cut-offs for GDM were fasting ≥ 5.3, 1 h ≥ 10.0 or 2-h glucose ≥ 8.6 mmol/L. Women who did not meet these criteria but met the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria (fasting 5.1-5.2 mmol/L and/or 2-h glucose 8.5 mmol/L, n = 509) or the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria (2-h glucose 7.8-8.5 mmol/L, n = 166) were considered as mild untreated hyperglycaemia. Women who met both the Finnish criteria and the IADPSG or the NICE criteria were considered as treated GDM groups (n = 1292 and n = 612, respectively). Controls were normoglycaemic according to all criteria (fasting glucose < 5.1 mmol/L, 1-h glucose < 10.0 mmol/L and 2-h glucose < 8.5 mmol/L, n = 3031). Untreated mild hyperglycemia groups were compared to controls and treated GDM groups. The primary outcome - a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, birth trauma or perinatal mortality - was analysed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The risk for the adverse neonatal outcome in untreated mild hyperglycemia was not increased compared to controls (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.44, using the IADPSG criteria; aOR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.60-1.85, using the NICE criteria). The risk was lower compared to the treated IADPSG (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27-0.53) or the treated NICE group (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.57). DISCUSSION: The risk of adverse neonatal outcomes was not increased in mild untreated hyperglycaemia compared to normoglycaemic controls and was lower than in the treated GDM groups. The OGTT cut-offs of 5.3 mmol/L at fasting and 8.6 mmol/L at 2 h seem to sufficiently identify clinically relevant GDM, without excluding neonates with a risk of adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Hyperglycemia , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Glucose , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Hyperglycemia/epidemiology , Fasting
20.
BMC Res Notes ; 17(1): 105, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622619

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To build and validate an early risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on first-trimester electronic medical records including maternal demographic and clinical risk factors. METHODS: To develop and validate a GDM prediction model, two datasets were used in this retrospective study. One included data of 14,015 pregnant women from Máxima Medical Center (MMC) in the Netherlands. The other was from an open-source database nuMoM2b including data of 10,038 nulliparous pregnant women, collected in the USA. Widely used maternal demographic and clinical risk factors were considered for modeling. A GDM prediction model based on elastic net logistic regression was trained from a subset of the MMC data. Internal validation was performed on the remaining MMC data to evaluate the model performance. For external validation, the prediction model was tested on an external test set from the nuMoM2b dataset. RESULTS: An area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81 was achieved for early prediction of GDM on the MMC test data, comparable to the performance reported in previous studies. While the performance markedly decreased to an AUC of 0.69 when testing the MMC-based model on the external nuMoM2b test data, close to the performance trained and tested on the nuMoM2b dataset only (AUC = 0.70).


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Demography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...