Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.480
Filter
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3591, 2024 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678022

ABSTRACT

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used for gastric acid-related disorders, but their safety profile and risk stratification for high-burden diseases need further investigation. Analyzing over 2 million participants from five prospective cohorts from the US, the UK, and China, we found that PPI use correlated with increased risk of 15 leading global diseases, such as ischemic heart disease, diabetes, respiratory infections, and chronic kidney disease. These associations showed dose-response relationships and consistency across different PPI types. PPI-related absolute risks increased with baseline risks, with approximately 82% of cases occurring in those at the upper 40% of the baseline predicted risk, and only 11.5% of cases occurring in individuals at the lower 50% of the baseline risk. While statistical association does not necessarily imply causation, its potential safety concerns suggest that personalized use of PPIs through risk stratification might guide appropriate decision-making for patients, clinicians, and the public.


Subject(s)
Proton Pump Inhibitors , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Risk Assessment , Male , Female , Middle Aged , China/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Aged , Prospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Precision Medicine , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/chemically induced , Myocardial Ischemia/chemically induced , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Risk Factors
3.
Ren Fail ; 46(1): 2313173, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the patient survival rates based on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in a large cohort of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into four groups based on the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) as follows: No group, patients without a prescription of any anti-hypertensive drugs including RASBs; Other group, patients with a prescription of anti-hypertensive drugs excluding RASBs; ACEI group, patients with a prescription of an ACEI; and ARB group, patients with a prescription of an ARB. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates in the no, other, ACEI, and ARB groups were 68.6%, 67.8%, 70.6%, and 69.2%, respectively. The ACEI group had the best patient survival trend among the four groups. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences were observed between the ACEI and ARB groups. Among young patients and patients without diabetes or heart disease, the ACEI group had the best patient survival among the four groups. However, among patients with DM or heart disease, the ARB group had the best patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that patients receiving ACEI and ARB had comparable survival. However, patients receiving ARB had better survival in the subgroups of patients with DM or heart disease, and patients receiving ACEI had better survival in the subgroup of young patients or patients without diabetes or heart disease.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Heart Diseases , Humans , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Antihypertensive Agents , Cohort Studies , Renal Dialysis , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Heart Diseases/chemically induced
4.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv19676, 2024 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551376

ABSTRACT

Allergic contact dermatitis is reported among individuals using continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to describe contact allergy patterns for allergens in the Swedish baseline series and medical device-related allergens among users. Contact allergy to baseline series allergens and isobornyl acrylate was compared between diabetes patients and dermatitis patients patch-tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology during 2017 to 2020. Fifty- four diabetes patients and 2,567 dermatitis patients were included. The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix was significantly higher in diabetes patients compared with dermatitis patients. Of the diabetes patients 13.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.5% tested positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (p < 0.001). Of the diabetes patients 7.4% and of the dermatitis patients 2.3% tested positive to fragrance mix II (p = 0.041). Of the diabetes patients 70.4% tested positive to medical device-related allergens. Of the diabetes patients 63.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.2% were allergic to isobornyl acrylate (p < 0.001). In conclusion, not only medical device-related contact allergies, but also contact allergy to baseline series allergens (fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix), is overrepresented in diabetes patients who use medical devices.


Subject(s)
Acrylates , Camphanes , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Diabetes Mellitus , Sesquiterpenes , Humans , Allergens/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Patch Tests , Lactones
5.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 52, 2024 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are still suboptimal, and it is unclear if diabetic patients might derive a benefit from the use of drug-coated balloons. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) MagicTouch (Concept Medical, India). METHODS: We conducted a subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated EASTBOURNE registry, evaluating the performance of MagicTouch SCB in patients with and without diabetes. The study primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary clinical endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and BARC 2-5 bleedings. RESULTS: Among 2,083 enrolled patients, a total of 864 suffered from diabetes (41.5%). Patients with diabetes had a numerically higher occurrence of TLR (6.5% vs. 4.7% HR 1.38, 95%CI 0.91-2.08), all-cause death (3.8% vs. 2.6%, HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.95-3.46), and MACE (12.2% vs. 8.9%; HR 1.26 95%CI 0.92-1.74). The incidence of spontaneous MI was significantly higher among diabetic patients (3.4% vs. 1.5%, HR 2.15 95%CI 1.09-4.25); bleeding events did not significantly differ. The overall incidence of TLR was higher among in-stent restenosis (ISR) as compared to de-novo coronary lesions, irrespectively from diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In the EASTBOURNE DIABETES registry, diabetic patients treated with the MagicTouch SCB did not have a significant increase in TLR when compared to non-diabetic patients; moreover, diabetic status did not affect the study device performance in terms of TLR, in both de-novo lesions and ISR.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Restenosis , Diabetes Mellitus , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Sirolimus/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Registries , Coronary Restenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Restenosis/etiology
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4690, 2024 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38409191

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the impact of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) over a 12-month period. We retrospectively reviewed 90 DME patients treated with DEX implants, categorizing them based on baseline HbA1c levels (≤ 7% and > 7%) and 12-month changes in HbA1c ("improved", "stable", "worsened"). At the 2-month mark, the mean central subfield thickness (CST) reduction in the HbA1c ≤ 7% group was - 147.22 ± 113.79 µm compared to -130.41 ± 124.50 µm in the > 7% group (p = 0.506). Notably, 12-month outcomes between these groups showed no significant difference. The "improved" HbA1c subgroup experienced a more pronounced CST reduction at 2 months (p = 0.042), with outcomes leveling off with other groups by 12 months. Conclusively, DEX implant outcomes in DME were not influenced by either baseline HbA1c levels or their changes over time. This suggests that local alterations in the inflammation milieu may have a potentially stronger impact on DME treatment outcomes, highlighting the importance of considering local factors in DME treatment.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Humans , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Glycated Hemoglobin , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Drug Implants/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Intravitreal Injections , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced
7.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0284267, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hypozincemia is a prevalent adverse consequence in diabetes mellitus (DM) and ß-Thalassemia patients. We aimed to evaluate the level of serum zinc in ß-thalassemia patients with DM and a risk assessment for hypozincemia. METHODS: The study population included transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) and non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT) with overt DM (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dL, and/or 2-h plasma glucose≥200 mg/dL). Serum zinc concentration was measured by the colorimetric method, and the values below 70 µg/dL were defined as hypozincemia. Myocardial and liver T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI T2*, millisecond [ms]) were valued by a free contrast MRI. The demographic, clinical, paraclinical, and laboratory data were also recorded. The data belonged to the period from December 2018 until December 2020. RESULTS: Of 64 diabetic ß-thalassemia patients, 41 cases had zinc data in their medical files (aged 38 ± 9 years, 48.8% female). 78.05% of patients (n = 32) were TDT, and 21.95% were NTDT (n = 9). The mean ± standard deviation of zinc level was 110.2 ± 127.6 µg/dL. The prevalence of hypozincemia was 9.76%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 19.24 (four cases). After controlling age, the odds of hypozincemia for using deferasirox (DFX) was 8.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 127.1. In ß-thalassemia patients, the age-adjusted risk of hypozincemia was calculated at 15.85, 95% CI 0.47 to 529.3 for hepatitis C. The adjusted risk of hypozincemia based on age for antacid use was 6.34, 95% CI 0.39 to 102.7. CONCLUSION: In light of this study, as well as hepatitis C, using DFX and antacids is associated with a high risk of hypozincemia amid diabetic ß-thalassemia cases. However, upward bias should be taken into consideration.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hepatitis C , Iron Overload , Thalassemia , beta-Thalassemia , Humans , Female , Male , beta-Thalassemia/complications , beta-Thalassemia/drug therapy , Deferasirox/therapeutic use , Iron Overload/complications , Blood Glucose , Risk Factors , Thalassemia/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/complications , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Zinc , Iron Chelating Agents/therapeutic use
8.
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 55: 100535, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245949

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esaxerenone is a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker. Here, we assessed efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships of esaxerenone and its covariates and thereby justified the recommended dosage regimens, focusing on the safety benefits of up-titration regimen in patients at higher risk for increased serum potassium (sK+). METHODS: The relationships between model-derived individual esaxerenone exposure and efficacy (blood pressure [BP]) and safety (increased sK+) were evaluated using multivariate linear regression and Cox regression analyses, respectively, using data from 1453 hypertensive patients with or without diabetic kidney disease in five clinical studies. RESULTS: Exposure-efficacy analyses demonstrated that higher exposure was linearly associated with greater BP reduction over the investigated dose range. Exposure-safety analyses showed that higher exposure was associated with a higher risk of increased sK+ under a fixed-dosing regimen; higher baseline sK+ and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were influential covariates. Model-based simulations suggested that fewer occurrences of increased sK+ are expected under the up-titration regimen (from 1.25 to 5 mg) relative to the fixed-dosing regimen (5 mg) in patients with different combinations of these covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure-response analyses supported the esaxerenone recommended doses and the safety benefits of using the up-titration regimen.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Nephropathies , Hypertension , Sulfones , Humans , Diabetic Nephropathies/drug therapy , Diabetic Nephropathies/chemically induced , Receptors, Mineralocorticoid , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/chemically induced , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced
9.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 31(1): 549-563, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38015390

ABSTRACT

Exposure to particulate matter (PM) has been linked to metabolic diseases. However, the effects of PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 1.0 µm (PM1) on metabolic diseases remain unclear. This study is aimed at assessing the associations of PM1 with metabolic disease risk and quantifying the concentration-response (C-R) relationship of PM1 with metabolic disease risk. A national cross-sectional study was conducted, including 12,495 middle-aged and older adults in 123 Chinese cities. The two-year average concentration of PM1 was evaluated using satellite-based spatiotemporal models. Metabolic diseases, including abdominal obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome, were identified based on physical examination, blood standard biochemistry examination, and self-reported disease histories. Generalized linear models and C-R curves were used to evaluate the associations of PM1 with metabolic diseases. A total of 12,495 participants were included in this study, with a prevalence of 45.73% for abdominal obesity, 20.22% for diabetes, 42.46% for hypertension, 41.01% for dyslipidemia, and 33.78% for metabolic syndrome. The mean ± standard deviation age of participants was 58.79 ± 13.14 years. In addition to dyslipidemia, exposure to PM1 was associated with increased risks of abdominal obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. Each 10 µg/m3 increase in PM1 concentrations was associated with 39% (odds ratio (OR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33, 1.46) increase in abdominal obesity, 18% (OR = 1.18, 95%CI 1.12, 1.25) increase in diabetes, 11% (OR = 1.11, 95%CI 1.06, 1.16) increase in hypertension, and 25% (OR = 1.25, 95%CI 1.19, 1.31) in metabolic syndrome, respectively. C-R curves showed that the OR values of abdominal obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome were increased gradually with the increase of PM1 concentrations. Subgroup analysis indicated that exposure to PM1 was associated with increased metabolic disease risks among participants with different lifestyles and found that solid fuel users were more susceptible to PM1 than clean fuel users. This national cross-sectional study indicated that exposure to higher PM1 might increase abdominal obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome risk, and solid fuel use might accelerate the adverse effects of PM1 on metabolic syndrome risk. Further longitudinal cohort studies are warranted to establish a causal inference between PM1 exposure and metabolic disease risk.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Hypertension , Metabolic Diseases , Metabolic Syndrome , Middle Aged , Humans , Aged , Particulate Matter/analysis , Prevalence , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obesity, Abdominal/epidemiology , Obesity, Abdominal/chemically induced , Cities , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/chemically induced , Metabolic Diseases/epidemiology , Obesity/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/chemically induced , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis , China/epidemiology , Air Pollution/analysis
10.
Acta Diabetol ; 61(3): 351-360, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934231

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The use of statins has been associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. The characteristics of the population could influence this association. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of new-onset diabetes with the use of statins in patients in primary prevention, with an assessment of the results according to the baseline risk of developing diabetes of the included population. METHODS: We performed an updated meta-analysis including randomized trials of statin therapy in primary prevention settings that report new-onset diabetes. The rate of new cases of diabetes in the control arms was estimated for each study. The studies were classified into two groups (low rate: < 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year; high rate; ≥ 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year). The fixed-effects model was performed. RESULTS: Eight studies (70,453 patients) were included. Globally, statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2, I2 35%). When we analyzed the studies according to the baseline diabetes risk in the control groups, the results showed that there was a greater risk only in the studies with a high baseline rate (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3, I2 0%; interaction p value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Globally, the use of statins in patients in primary prevention was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. In the stratified analysis, this association was observed only in the group of studies with a high baseline rate of events.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Primary Prevention , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control
11.
Infect Dis Now ; 54(1): 104835, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37972818

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in treatment of patients with diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis with bone culture confirmation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2021, all consecutive patients receiving at least one 1500 mg dose of dalbavancin for diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis were included in a retrospective study. Remission was defined as absence of relapsing infection or need for surgery at the initial or a contiguous site during 6-month follow-up from the last dose of dalbavancin. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. Eleven (85%) patients were surgically treated. Six (46%) patients received dalbavancin as first-line treatment and 7 (54%) as second-line treatment due to adverse events related to previous treatments. One adverse event was reported. At 6-month follow-up, 11 patients were evaluable and 9 (82%) were in remission. CONCLUSIONS: In the study, dalbavancin was well-tolerated and showed microbiological and clinical efficacy.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Osteomyelitis , Teicoplanin/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
12.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 26(1): 31-38, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37474127

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to compare medication efficacy in participants with medical comorbidities who smoke in the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES) trial, a double-blind, triple-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled randomized controlled trial. AIMS AND METHODS: Participants were from the U.S. cohort of the main trial and randomized (1:1:1:1) to varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patch, or placebo for 12 weeks with follow-up through week 24. Medical comorbidity data were derived from the baseline medical screening questionnaire and categorized into four subgroups (cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes). Within each comorbidity, generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the association between treatment and continuous abstinence rates from weeks 9-12 to 9-24. Similar models were used to test the effect of number of comorbidities on abstinence. RESULTS: Varenicline resulted in the highest week 12 abstinence rates across all pharmacotherapies and compared to placebo in all comorbidity subgroups: Cardiac (40.0% vs. 3.6%; odds ratios [OR] = 23.3 [5.1-107.1]), respiratory (24.7% vs. 12.8%; OR = 2.2 [1.3-3.8]), vascular (29.1% vs. 10.4%; OR = 3.6 [2.3-5.7]), and diabetes (30.9% vs. 8.3%; OR = 6.5 [2.3-19.0]). This was maintained at week 24 for those with cardiac (23.3% vs. 1.8%; OR = 21.7 [2.7-178.2]), vascular (18.9% vs. 7.1%; OR = 3.1 [1.8-5.3]), and diabetes (20.6% vs. 4.2%; OR = 8.4 [2.1-33.7]) comorbidities. Treatment contrasts within some comorbidity subgroups revealed superior efficacy of varenicline over other pharmacotherapies. All pharmacotherapies increased the odds of abstinence regardless of number of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with manageable cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes conditions to quit smoking, supporting recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as first-line pharmacotherapy. Bupropion and NRT demonstrated efficacy for some comorbidity subgroups. IMPLICATIONS: This secondary analysis of the EAGLES trial demonstrated that varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes diagnoses to quit smoking. This demonstration of varenicline efficacy among individuals with comorbid medical conditions supports recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as a first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Smoking Cessation , Humans , Smoking Cessation/methods , Varenicline , Bupropion/adverse effects , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/adverse effects , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use
13.
Diabetes Care ; 47(1): 81-88, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713477

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) must be on the most effective dose of aspirin to mitigate risk of future adverse cardiovascular events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ADAPTABLE, an open-label, pragmatic study, randomized patients with stable, chronic ASCVD to 81 mg or 325 mg of daily aspirin. The effects of aspirin dosing was assessed on the primary effectiveness outcome, a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke, and the primary safety outcome of hospitalization for major bleeding. In this prespecified analysis, we used Cox proportional hazards models to compare aspirin dosing in patients with and without DM for the primary effectiveness and safety outcome. RESULTS: Of 15,076 patients, 5,676 (39%) had DM of whom 2,820 (49.7%) were assigned to 81 mg aspirin and 2,856 (50.3%) to 325 mg aspirin. Patients with versus without DM had higher rates of the composite cardiovascular outcome (9.6% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001) and bleeding events (0.78% vs. 0.50%; P < 0.001). When comparing 81 mg vs. 325 mg of aspirin, patients with DM had no difference in the primary effectiveness outcome (9.3% vs. 10.0%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [95% CI 0.83-1.16]; P = 0.265) or safety outcome (0.87% vs. 0.69%; subdistribution HR 1.25 [95% CI 0.72-2.16]; P = 0.772). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the inherently higher risk of patients with DM irrespective of aspirin dosing. Our findings suggest that a higher dose of aspirin yields no added clinical benefit, even in a more vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Myocardial Infarction , Stroke , Humans , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Stroke/epidemiology
14.
Oncologist ; 29(1): e81-e89, 2024 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561957

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment has been identified to be a risk factor for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the specific contribution of post-TKI metabolic syndrome and the individual TKIs, including imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, contribute to the development of CVDs remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide database to investigate the incidence of post-TKI metabolic syndrome, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, as well as their association with CVDs. To compare the risk of post-TKI comorbidities and CVDs among TKIs, we utilized the incidence rate ratio (IRR), and subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) calculated from multiple Fine-Gray models. RESULTS: A total of 1211 patients without diabetes, 1235 patients without hyperlipidemia, and 1074 patients without hypertension were enrolled in the study. The incidence rate of post-TKI diabetes and hyperlipidemia was the highest in patients treated with nilotinib compared to imatinib and dasatinib (IRRs ≥ 3.15, Ps ≤ .047). After adjusting for confounders, nilotinib remained a significant risk factor for post-TKI diabetes and hyperlipidemia at an SHR of 3.83 (P < .001) and 5.15 (P < .001), respectively. Regarding the occurrence of CVDs, patients treated with nilotinib were more likely to develop CVDs than those treated with imatinib in non-hyperlipidemic group (IRR = 3.21, P = .020). Pre-existing and post-TKI hyperlipidemia were found to have a stronger association with CVDs, with SHR values of 5.81 (P = .034) and 13.21 (P = .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that nilotinib treatment is associated with increased risks of diabetes and hyperlipidemia, with hyperlipidemia being the most significant risk for CVDs. Therefore, we recommend that CML patients receiving nilotinib should undergo screening for diabetes and hyperlipidemia prior to initiating TKI treatment. Additionally, regular monitoring of lipid profiles during TKI therapy and implementing effective management strategies to control hyperlipidemia are crucial.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Hyperlipidemias , Hypertension , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Dasatinib , Imatinib Mesylate , Cohort Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/chemically induced , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/complications , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hypertension/chemically induced , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hyperlipidemias/chemically induced , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology
15.
Ophthalmologica ; 247(1): 19-29, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety and efficacy of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of different doses of IVTA in this setting. METHODS: A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted on Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE from January 2005 to May 2022. Studies that reported on patients with DME or ME secondary to RVO that received treatment with different doses of IVTA were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Five RCTs reporting on 1,041 eyes at baseline were included in this meta-analysis. In eyes with ME secondary to RVO, high-dose (4 mg) IVTA achieved a significantly better change in best-corrected visual acuity (WMD = -4.75 ETDRS letters, 95% CI = [-7.73, -1.78], p = 0.002) and reduction in retinal thickness (WMD = -93.02 µm, 95% CI = [-153.23, -32.82], p = 0.002) at months 4-6 compared to low-dose (1-2 mg) IVTA. However, high-dose IVTA had a higher risk of intraocular pressure-related adverse events (RR = 2.99, 95% CI = [1.05, 8.50], p = 0.04) and cataract surgery (RR = 5.67, 95% CI = [3.09, 10.41], p < 0.00001) than low-dose IVTA in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. These efficacy and safety differences in high-dose and low-dose IVTA were not observed in DME eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The RCT evidence in this setting is limited. High-dose IVTA achieved greater improvements in visual acuity and reductions in retinal thickness than low-dose IVTA at months 4-6. However, high-dose IVTA had a less favorable safety profile than low-dose IVTA. The significance of these outcomes was based on patients with ME secondary to RVO, but not DME.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Humans , Triamcinolone Acetonide/adverse effects , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/diagnosis , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Intravitreal Injections , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
16.
Schizophr Bull ; 50(2): 447-459, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37622178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Antipsychotics are first-line drug treatments for schizophrenia. When antipsychotic monotherapy is ineffective, combining two antipsychotic drugs is common although treatment guidelines warn of possible increases in side effects. Risks of metabolic side effects with antipsychotic polypharmacy have not been fully investigated. This study examined associations between antipsychotic polypharmacy and risk of developing diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia in adults with schizophrenia, and impact of co-prescription of first- and second-generation antipsychotics. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based prospective cohort study was conducted in the United Kingdom using linked primary care, secondary care, mental health, and social deprivation datasets. Cox proportional hazards models with stabilizing weights were used to estimate risk of metabolic disorders among adults with schizophrenia, comparing patients on antipsychotic monotherapy vs polypharmacy, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, and antipsychotic dose. STUDY RESULTS: Median follow-up time across the three cohorts was approximately 14 months. 6.6% developed hypertension in the cohort assembled for this outcome, with polypharmacy conferring an increased risk compared to monotherapy, (adjusted Hazard Ratio = 3.16; P = .021). Patients exposed to exclusive first-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy had greater risk of hypertension compared to those exposed to combined first- and second-generation polypharmacy (adjusted HR 0.29, P = .039). No associations between polypharmacy and risk of diabetes or hyperlipidemia were found. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic polypharmacy, particularly polypharmacy solely comprised of first-generation antipsychotics, increased the risk of hypertension. Future research employing larger samples, follow-up longer than the current median of 14 months, and more complex methodologies may further elucidate the association reported in this study.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Diabetes Mellitus , Hyperlipidemias , Hypertension , Metabolic Diseases , Schizophrenia , Adult , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/chemically induced , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Metabolic Diseases/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hyperlipidemias/chemically induced , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology , Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy , Hypertension/chemically induced , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/drug therapy
17.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 46(1): e91-e93, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019672

ABSTRACT

Sirolimus (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor) is a potent immunosuppressive agent, used in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for Graft vs Host disease prophylaxis. Compared to calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus has no neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity, but sirolimus causes dose-dependent thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, delayed wound healing, hyperlipidemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Here we report a case of acute pancreatitis and diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with sickle cell disease post haploidentical family donor HSCT which was managed conservatively without plasmapheresis. Based on our review of the literature, this is the first reported case of developing acute pancreatitis as an adverse effect of sirolimus-induced hypertriglyceridemia leading to diabetic ketoacidosis in a recipient of HSCT.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hypertriglyceridemia , Pancreatitis , Humans , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/chemically induced , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/therapy , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/complications , Acute Disease , Pancreatitis/chemically induced , Pancreatitis/therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hypertriglyceridemia/chemically induced , Hypertriglyceridemia/therapy , Hypertriglyceridemia/complications , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Anemia, Sickle Cell/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
18.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 90(3): 819-827, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37945350

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To gain insight in the uptake and practice variation in the prescription of 2 new medicine groups for common conditions in primary care (direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs] and incretin-based therapies) from introduction, around 2007, to 2019 and the correlation between the adoption of those medicines in primary care. METHODS: Prescription data from general practices in the Dutch Nivel Primary Care Database from 2007 to 2019 were used. The percentage of patients with prescriptions for DOACs of all patients with prescriptions for DOACs and vitamin K antagonists was calculated per practice per year, as was the percentage of patients prescribed incretin-based therapies as a proportion of all patients with diabetes medication. Multilevel models were used to estimate practice variation for DOACs and incretin-based therapies, expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients. Linear regression analysis was used to study the association between the prescription of DOACs and incretin-based therapies. RESULTS: Per year, 46-424 general practices and 179 933-1 654 376 patients were included. In 2019, the mean percentage of patients per practice using DOACs or incretin-based therapies was 54.9 and 9.7%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient decreased from 0.75 to 0.024 for DOACs and from 0.33 to 0.074 for incretin-based medicines during the study period. No clear correlation was found between the prescription of DOACs and incretin-based therapies. CONCLUSION: DOACs and incretin-based therapies have different adoption profiles and practice variation is large, especially in the years before these medicines were introduced in guidelines. Early adopters of both medicine classes differ.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Incretins , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Primary Health Care , Administration, Oral , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced
19.
Curr Neuropharmacol ; 22(1): 53-64, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550909

ABSTRACT

A majority of older patients suffer from neuropathic pain (NP) that significantly alters their daily activities and imposes a significant burden on health care. Multiple comorbidities and the risk of polypharmacy in the elderly make it challenging to determine the appropriate drug, dosage, and maintenance of therapy. Age-dependent processes play a contributing role in neuropathy given that diabetic neuropathy (DN) is the most common form of neuropathy. This narrative review is mainly focused on the drug treatment approach for neuropathy-associated pain in aged people including both drugs and dietary supplements, considering the latter as add-on mechanism-based treatments to increase the effectiveness of usual treatments by implementing their activity or activating other analgesic pathways. On one hand, the limited clinical studies assessing the effectiveness and the adverse effects of existing pain management options in this age segment of the population (> 65), on the other hand, the expanding global demographics of the elderly contribute to building up an unresolved pain management problem that needs the attention of healthcare providers, researchers, and health authorities as well as the expansion of the current therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Neuropathies , Neuralgia , Aged , Humans , Diabetic Neuropathies/complications , Diabetic Neuropathies/drug therapy , Diabetic Neuropathies/chemically induced , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/adverse effects , Pain Management , Dietary Supplements , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy
20.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 270: 115829, 2024 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103521

ABSTRACT

Impact of air pollution on incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) in diabetic patients is insufficiently studied. We aimed to examine exposure-response associations of PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5-10, NO2, and NOX with incident CKD in diabetic patients in the UK. We also widened exposure level of PM2.5 and examined PM2.5-CKD association in diabetic patients across the entire range of global concentration. Based on data from UK biobank cohort, we applied Cox proportional hazards models and the shape constrained health impact function to investigate the associations between air pollutants and incident CKD in diabetic patients. Global exposure mortality model was applied to combine the PM2.5-CKD association in diabetic patients in the UK with all other published associations. Multiple air pollutants were positively associated with incident CKD in diabetic patients in the UK, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.034 (95 %CI: 1.015-1.053) and 1.021 (95 %CI: 1.007-1.036) for every 1 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and PM10 concentration, and 1.113 (95 %CI: 1.053-1.177) and 1.058 (95 %CI: 1.027-1.091) for every 10 µg/m3 increase in NO2 and NOX concentration, respectively. For PM2.5-10, associations with CKD in diabetic patients did not reach the statistical significance. Exposure-response associations with CKD in diabetic patients showed a near-linear trend for PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and NOX in the UK, whereas PM2.5-DKD associations in the globe exhibited a non-linear increasing trend. This study supports that air pollution could significantly increase the risk of CKD onset in diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Diabetes Mellitus , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Particulate Matter/toxicity , Nitrogen Dioxide/analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...