Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.623
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12727, 2024 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830947

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It occurs due to a combination of genetics, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) is a neglected clinical entity despite the rising number of cases worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of premature coronary artery disease. In this study, we searched articles that had studied the risk factors of premature coronary artery diseases from January 2000 to July 2022 in Saudi Arabia in Web of Science, Pub Med, Scopus, Springer, and Wiley databases. The final analysis is based on seven articles. The smoking prevalence was 39%, diabetes mellitus 41%, hypertension 33%, overweight and obesity 18%, family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) 19%, dyslipidemia 37%, and the prevalence range of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 33.8-55.0%. The results revealed a mortality prevalence of 4% ranging from 2 to 8% which is similar to the prevalence in older patients which was 2-10%. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, family history of CAD, dyslipidemia, and overweight/obesity are significantly and positively associated with premature coronary artery diseases. The health authorities should design and implement an intensive and effective prophylactic plan to minimize the subsequent impact of PCAD on the young population. In addition, early diagnosis of PCAD has great value in providing timely treatment, managing the patients, and minimizing the burden of the disease.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Humans , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/genetics , Risk Factors , Male , Prevalence , Female , Adult , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Middle Aged
2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302422, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the last three decades, much effort has been invested in measuring and improving the quality of diabetes care. We assessed the association between adherence to diabetes quality indicators and all-cause mortality in the primary care setting. METHODS: A nationwide, population-based, historical cohort study of all people aged 45-80 with pharmacologically-treated diabetes in 2005 (n = 222,235). Data on annual performance of quality indicators (including indicators for metabolic risk factor management and glycemic control) and vital status were retrieved from electronic medical records of the four Israeli health maintenance organizations. Cox proportional hazards and time-dependent models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality by degree of adherence to quality indicators. RESULTS: During 2,000,052 person-years of follow-up, 35.8% of participants died. An inverse dose-response association between the degree of adherence and mortality was shown for most of the quality indicators. Participants who were not tested for proteinuria or did not visit an ophthalmologist during the first-5-years of follow-up had HRs of 2.60 (95%CI:2.49-2.69) and 2.09 (95%CI:2.01-2.16), respectively, compared with those who were fully adherent. In time-dependent analyses, not measuring LDL-cholesterol, blood pressure, HbA1c, or HbA1c>9% were similarly associated with mortality (HRs ≈1.5). The association of uncontrolled blood pressure with mortality was modified by age, with increased mortality shown for those with controlled blood pressure at older ages (≥65 years). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal adherence to diabetes quality indicators is associated with reduced all-cause mortality. Primary care professionals need to be supported by health care systems to perform quality indicators.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Primary Health Care , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Humans , Aged , Primary Health Care/standards , Male , Female , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Cohort Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Israel/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models
3.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10458, 2024 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714673

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the effect of diabetic retinopathy (DR) status or severity on all-cause and cause-specific mortality among diabetic older adults in the United States using the most recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) follow-up mortality data. The severity of DR was graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grading scale. Multiple covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, Fine and Gray competing risk regression models, and propensity score matching (PSM) methods were used to assess the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in individuals with diabetes. All analyses adopted the weighted data and complex stratified design approach proposed by the NHANES guidelines. Time to death was calculated based on the time between baseline and date of death or December 31, 2019, whichever came first. Ultimately 1077 participants, representing 3,025,316 US non-hospitalized individuals with diabetes, were included in the final analysis. After a median follow-up of 12.24 years (IQR, 11.16-13.49), 379 participants were considered deceased from all-causes, with 43.90% suffering from DR, including mild DR (41.50%), moderate to severe DR (46.77%), and proliferative DR (PDR) (67.21%). DR was associated with increased all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM)-specific mortality, which remained consistent after propensity score matching (PSM). Results of DR grading assessment suggested that the presence of mild, moderate to severe NPDR was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause and CVD-specific mortality, while the presence and severity of any DR was associated with increased DM-specific mortality, with a positive trend. The presence of DR in elderly individuals with diabetes is significantly associated with the elevated all-cause and CVD mortality. The grading or severity of DR may reflect the severity of cardiovascular disease status and overall mortality risk in patients with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy , Nutrition Surveys , Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/mortality , Male , Female , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Proportional Hazards Models , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality
4.
Environ Health ; 23(1): 46, 2024 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702725

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term exposure to transportation noise is related to cardio-metabolic diseases, with more recent evidence also showing associations with diabetes mellitus (DM) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the association between transportation noise and DM mortality within the Swiss National Cohort. METHODS: During 15 years of follow-up (2001-2015; 4.14 million adults), over 72,000 DM deaths were accrued. Source-specific noise was calculated at residential locations, considering moving history. Multi-exposure, time-varying Cox regression was used to derive hazard ratios (HR, and 95%-confidence intervals). Models included road traffic, railway and aircraft noise, air pollution, and individual and area-level covariates including socio-economic position. Analyses included exposure-response modelling, effect modification, and a subset analysis around airports. The main findings were integrated into meta-analyses with published studies on mortality and incidence (separately and combined). RESULTS: HRs were 1.06 (1.05, 1.07), 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) and 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) per 10 dB day evening-night level (Lden) road traffic, railway and aircraft noise, respectively (adjusted model, including NO2). Splines suggested a threshold for road traffic noise (~ 46 dB Lden, well below the 53 dB Lden WHO guideline level), but not railway noise. Substituting for PM2.5, or including deaths with type 1 DM hardly changed the associations. HRs were higher for males compared to females, and in younger compared to older adults. Focusing only on type 1 DM showed an independent association with road traffic noise. Meta-analysis was only possible for road traffic noise in relation to mortality (1.08 [0.99, 1.18] per 10 dB, n = 4), with the point estimate broadly similar to that for incidence (1.07 [1.05, 1.09] per 10 dB, n = 10). Combining incidence and mortality studies indicated positive associations for each source, strongest for road traffic noise (1.07 [1.05, 1.08], 1.02 [1.01, 1.03], and 1.02 [1.00, 1.03] per 10 dB road traffic [n = 14], railway [n = 5] and aircraft noise [n = 5], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence that transportation noise is associated with diabetes mortality. With the growing evidence and large disease burden, DM should be viewed as an important outcome in the noise and health discussion.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Environmental Exposure , Noise, Transportation , Noise, Transportation/adverse effects , Humans , Switzerland/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Male , Female , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Aircraft
5.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(5): e1085, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709081

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the association of preexisting diabetes mellitus with all-cause mortality and organ support receipt in adult patients with sepsis. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada (2008-2019). POPULATION: Adult patients (18 yr old or older) with a first sepsis-related hospitalization episode. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main exposure of interest was preexisting diabetes (either type 1 or 2). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality by 90 days; secondary outcomes included receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation and new renal replacement therapy. We report adjusted (for baseline characteristics using standardization) risk ratios (RRs) alongside 95% CIs. A main secondary analysis evaluated the potential mediation by prior metformin use of the association between preexisting diabetes and all-cause mortality following sepsis. Overall, 503,455 adults with a first sepsis-related hospitalization episode were included; 36% had preexisting diabetes. Mean age was 73 years, and 54% of the cohort were females. Preexisting diabetes was associated with a lower adjusted risk of all-cause mortality at 90 days (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.82). Preexisting diabetes was associated with an increased risk of new renal replacement therapy (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.46-1.60) but not invasive mechanical ventilation (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05). Overall, 21% (95% CI, 19-28) of the association between preexisting diabetes and reduced risk of all-cause mortality was mediated by prior metformin use. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting diabetes is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and higher risk of new renal replacement therapy among adult patients with sepsis. Future studies should evaluate the underlying mechanisms of these associations.


Subject(s)
Sepsis , Humans , Male , Female , Sepsis/mortality , Sepsis/therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Ontario/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial , Renal Replacement Therapy , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors
6.
Gac Med Mex ; 160(1): 9-16, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On December 31, 2019, one of the most serious pandemics in recent times made its appearance. Certain health conditions, such as obesity and diabetes mellitus, have been described to be related to COVID-19 unfavorable outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 998,639 patients. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed, with survivors being compared with the deceased individuals. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify variables predictive of COVID-19-associated mortality. RESULTS: Among the deceased patients, men accounted for 64.3%, and women, for 35.7%, with the difference being statistically significant. Subjects older than 80 years had a 13-fold higher risk of dying from COVID-19 (95% CI = 12,469, 13,586), while chronic kidney disease entailed a risk 1.5 times higher (95% CI = 1,341, 1,798), and diabetes mellitus involved a risk 1.25 times higher (95% CI = 1.238,1.276). CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, diabetes mellitus and obesity were found to be predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Further research related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, smoking and pregnancy is suggested.


ANTECEDENTES: El 31 de diciembre de 2019, se inició una de las pandemias más graves de los últimos tiempos. Se ha descrito que ciertas condiciones de salud, como la obesidad y la diabetes mellitus, están relacionadas con desenlaces desfavorables por COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Identificar factores asociados a mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Cohorte retrospectiva de 998 639 pacientes. Se analizaron las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de los pacientes, y se compararon supervivientes con fallecidos. Se utilizó el modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para la identificación de variables predictivas de defunción por COVID-19. RESULTADOS: Entre los fallecidos, los hombres representaron 64.3 % y las mujeres 35.7 %, diferencia que resultó estadísticamente significativa. Las personas con más de 80 años presentaron un riesgo 13 veces mayor de morir por COVID-19 (IC 95 % = 12.469,13.586) y la enfermedad renal crónica, un riesgo de 1.5 (IC 95 % = 1.341, 1.798); la diabetes mellitus tuvo un riesgo de 1.25 (IC 95 % = 1.238,1.276). CONCLUSIONES: La edad, el sexo, la diabetes mellitus y la obesidad resultaron ser entidades predictivas de muerte por COVID-19. Se sugiere más investigación relacionada con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, enfermedades cardiovasculares, tabaquismo y embarazo.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Obesity , Humans , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mexico/epidemiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Age Factors , Sex Factors , Young Adult , Proportional Hazards Models , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology
7.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 256, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755538

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of blood urea nitrogen(BUN) in patients with diabetes remain unknown. Current studies reporting the target BUN level in patients with diabetes are also limited. Hence, this prospective study aimed to explore the relationship of BUN with all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities in patients with diabetes. METHODS: In total, 10,507 participants with diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018) were enrolled. The causes and numbers of deaths were determined based on the National Death Index mortality data from the date of NHANES interview until follow-up (December 31, 2019). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) of mortality. RESULTS: Of the adult participants with diabetes, 4963 (47.2%) were female. The median (interquartile range) BUN level of participants was 5 (3.93-6.43) mmol/L. After 86,601 person-years of follow-up, 2,441 deaths were documented. After adjusting for variables, the HRs of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in the highest BUN level group were 1.52 and 1.35, respectively, compared with those in the lowest BUN level group. With a one-unit increment in BUN levels, the HRs of all-cause and CVD mortality rates were 1.07 and 1.08, respectively. The results remained robust when several sensitivity and stratified analyses were performed. Moreover, BUN showed a nonlinear association with all-cause and CVD mortality. Their curves all showed that the inflection points were close to the BUN level of 5 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: BUN had a nonlinear association with all-cause and CVD mortality in patients with diabetes. The inflection point was at 5 mmol/L.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Cardiovascular Diseases , Cause of Death , Diabetes Mellitus , Nutrition Surveys , Humans , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Time Factors , Risk Assessment , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Prognosis
8.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 171, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although studies have demonstrated the value of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiovascular mortality, however, few studies have shown that the TyG index is associated with all-cause or CVD mortality in young patients with diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the association between the TyG index and all-cause and CVD mortality in young patients with diabetes in the United States. METHODS: Our study recruited 2440 young patients with diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2018. Mortality outcomes were determined by linking to National Death Index (NDI) records up to December 31, 2019. Cox regression modeling was used to investigate the association between TyG index and mortality in young patients with diabetes. The nonlinear association between TyG index and mortality was analyzed using restricted cubic splines (RCS), and a two-segment Cox proportional risk model was constructed for both sides of the inflection point. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 8.2 years, 332 deaths from all causes and 82 deaths from cardiovascular disease were observed. Based on the RCS, the TyG index was found to have a U-shaped association with all-cause and CVD mortality in young patients with diabetes, with threshold values of 9.18 and 9.16, respectively. When the TyG index was below the threshold value (TyG index < 9.18 in all-cause mortality and < 9.16 in CVD mortality), its association with all-cause and CVD mortality was not significant. When the TyG index was above the threshold (TyG index ≥ 9.18 in all-cause mortality and ≥ 9.16 in CVD mortality), it showed a significant positive association with all-cause mortality and CVD mortality (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05-2.96 for all-cause mortality and HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.05-5.38 for CVD mortality). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a U-shaped association between TyG index and all-cause and CVD mortality among young patients with diabetes in the United States, with threshold values of 9.18 and 9.16 for CVD and all-cause mortality, respectively.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Blood Glucose , Cardiovascular Diseases , Cause of Death , Diabetes Mellitus , Nutrition Surveys , Triglycerides , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Male , Female , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Triglycerides/blood , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Time Factors , Prognosis , Young Adult , Age Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors
9.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303306, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820248

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetes and/or hypertension are the most common conditions in older people, and also related to higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality. This study aims to explore the risk of CVD incidence and mortality among older people with diabetes and/or hypertension over a 16 years follow-up period and investigates the role of depression and obesity in these relationships. METHODS: 6,855 participants aged 50+ from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The main exposure is having diabetes and/or hypertension at baseline (2002/2003) compared to not having, but excluded those with coronary heart disease (CHD) and/or stroke (CVD). Survival models are used for CVD incidence and mortality up to 2018, adjusted for socio-demographic, health, health behaviours, cognitive function, and physical function characteristics. RESULTS: 39.3% of people at baseline had diabetes and/or hypertension. The risk of CVD incidence was 1.7 (95%CI: 1.5; 1.9) higher among people with diabetes and/or hypertension compared to those without and was independent of covariates adjustment. People with diabetes and/or hypertension were also 1.3 (95%CI: 1.1; 1.8) times more likely to die from CVD than those without. We did not find evidence for an elevated risk of CVD incidence and mortality among people with obesity nor among those with depression. CONCLUSIONS: In order to effectively reduce the risk of CVD incidence and mortality among older people, treatment as well as management of hypertension and diabetes should be routinely considered for older people with diabetes and/or hypertension.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/mortality , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Incidence , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , England/epidemiology , Aging , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/complications , Risk Factors , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/mortality , Aged, 80 and over
10.
J Diabetes ; 16(6): e13561, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a possible link between diabetes and gastric cancer risk, but the findings remain inconclusive, with limited studies in the Asian population. We aimed to assess the impact of diabetes and diabetes duration on the development of gastric cancer overall, by anatomical and histological subtypes. METHODS: A pooled analysis was conducted using 12 prospective studies included in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Among 558 981 participants (median age 52), after a median follow-up of 14.9 years and 10.5 years, 8556 incident primary gastric cancers and 8058 gastric cancer deaths occurred, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Diabetes was associated with an increased incidence of overall gastric cancer (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25). The risk association did not differ significantly by sex (women vs men: HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.60 vs 1.12, 1.01-1.23), anatomical subsites (noncardia vs cardia: 1.14, 1.02-1.28 vs 1.17, 0.77-1.78) and histological subtypes (intestinal vs diffuse: 1.22, 1.02-1.46 vs 1.00, 0.62-1.61). Gastric cancer risk increased significantly during the first decade following diabetes diagnosis (HR 4.70, 95% CI 3.77-5.86), and decreased with time (nonlinear p < .01). Positive associations between diabetes and gastric cancer mortality were observed (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.28) but attenuated after a 2-year time lag. CONCLUSION: Diabetes was associated with an increased gastric cancer incidence regardless of sex, anatomical subsite, or subtypes of gastric cancer. The risk of gastric cancer was particularly high during the first decade following diabetes diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Incidence , Male , Female , Asia/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Risk Factors , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Aged , Adult
11.
Int J Cardiol ; 407: 132109, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence regarding the impact of different combinations of diabetes medications in heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus (HFwDM) remains limited. AIM: We aimed to investigate the effect of monotherapy and combination therapy for DM on all-cause mortality in HFwDM under triple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). METHOD: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included adult HFwDM under triple GDMT between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022.We collected the data from the National Electronic Database of the Turkish Ministry of Health.We created various combination including different diabetes medications based on the current guidelines for DM.The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 321,525 HFwDM under triple GDMT (female:49%, median age:68[61-75] years) were included. The highest rate of prescribed combination therapy was metformin and sulfonylureas (n = 55,266). In Cox regression analysis, insülin monotherapy had the highest risk for all-cause mortality (HR:2.25, 95CI%:2.06 - 2.45), whereas combination therapy including metformin, SGLT2i, and sulfonylureas provided the most beneficial effect on survival (HR:0.29, 95CI%:0.22-0.39) when compared to patients not receiving diabetes medication. Among patients taking diabetes medications, the inclusion of SGLT2i demonstrated a survival benefit (p < 0.05), despite concurrent use of volume-retaining medications such as insulin and thiazolidinediones. Conversely, combinations of diabetes medications without SGLT2i did not demonstrate any survival benefit compared to patients not taking diabetes medication (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study underscored the use of SGLT2i as monotherapy or as a part of combination diabetes medications to improve survival among HFwDM, while also highlighting that combinations lacking SGLT2i did not confer any survival benefit.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Hypoglycemic Agents , Humans , Female , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/mortality , Male , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Mortality/trends , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Turkey/epidemiology
12.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301300, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709763

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the combination of abnormal systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) levels and hyperglycemia increased the risk of cognitive function decline and reduced survival rate in the United States. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2011-2014 and enrolled 1,447 participants aged 60 years or older. Restricted cubic splines (RCS), linear regression and kaplan-meier(KM) curve were employed to explore the combined effects of abnormal SII and hyperglycemia on cognitive function and survival rate, and subgroup analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: The RCS analysis revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between lgSII levels and cognitive function. Linear regression analysis indicated that neither abnormal SII nor diabetes alone significantly contributed to the decline in cognitive function compared to participants with normal SII levels and blood glucose. However, when abnormal SII coexisted with diabetes (but not prediabetes), it resulted to a significant decline in cognitive function. After adjusting for various confounding factors, these results remained significant in Delayed Word Recall (ß:-0.76, P<0.05) and Digit Symbol Substitution tests (ß:-5.02, P<0.05). Nevertheless, these results showed marginal significance in Total Word Recall test as well as Animal Fluency test. Among all subgroup analyses performed, participants with both abnormal SII levels and diabetes exhibited the greatest decline in cognitive function compared to those with only diabetes. Furthermore, KM curve demonstrated that the combination of abnormal SII levels and diabetes decreased survival rate among participants. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the impact of diabetes on cognitive function/survival rate is correlated with SII levels, indicating that their combination enhances predictive power.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Inflammation , Nutrition Surveys , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Inflammation/blood , Survival Rate , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/immunology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Hyperglycemia/mortality , Blood Glucose/analysis
13.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 24(1): 64, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a novel hematological parameter to assess systemic inflammation. Prior investigations have indicated that an increased NLR may serve as a potential marker for pathological states such as cancer and atherosclerosis. However, there exists a dearth of research investigating the correlation between NLR levels and mortality in individuals with diabetes and prediabetes. Consequently, this study aims to examine the connection between NLR and all-cause as well as cardiovascular mortality in the population of the United States (US) with hyperglycemia status. METHODS: Data were collected from a total of 20,270 eligible individuals enrolled for analysis, spanning ten cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018. The subjects were categorized into three groups based on tertiles of NLR levels. The association of NLR with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Restricted cubic splines were used to visualize the nonlinear relationship between NLR levels and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in subjects with diabetes after accounting for all relevant factors. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 8.6 years, a total of 1909 subjects with diabetes died, with 671 deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD). And over a period of 8.46 years, 1974 subjects with prediabetes died, with 616 cases due to CVD. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) comparing high to low tertile of NLR in diabetes subjects were found to be 1.37 (95% CI, 1.19-1.58) for all-cause mortality and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.29-2.05) for CVD mortality. And the correlation between high to low NLR tertile and heightened susceptibility to mortality from any cause (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43) and CVD mortality (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.04) remained statistically significant (both p-values for trend < 0.05) in prediabetes subjects. The 10-year cumulative survival probability was determined to be 70.34%, 84.65% for all-cause events, and 86.21%, 94.54% for cardiovascular events in top NLR tertile of diabetes and prediabetes individuals, respectively. Furthermore, each incremental unit in the absolute value of NLR was associated with a 16%, 12% increase in all-cause mortality and a 25%, 24% increase in cardiovascular mortality among diabetes and prediabetes individuals, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this prospective cohort study conducted in the US indicate a positive association of elevated NLR levels with heightened risks of overall and cardiovascular mortality among adults with diabetes and prediabetes. However, potential confounding factors for NLR and the challenge of monitoring NLR's fluctuations over time should be further focused.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Lymphocytes , Neutrophils , Prediabetic State , Humans , Prediabetic State/mortality , Prediabetic State/blood , Male , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Female , Neutrophils/pathology , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Lymphocytes/pathology , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Nutrition Surveys , Cause of Death , Aged , Leukocyte Count
15.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1370489, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681766

ABSTRACT

Objective: Diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of death worldwide, and multiple risk factors associated with diabetes mortality. Methods: Employing spatial statistics, we characterized the spatial distribution and patterns of diabetes mortality, and revealed the spatial relationship between diabetes mortality and 11 socioeconomic and environmental risk factors at the country level, from 1990 to 2019. Results: Globally, significantly high rates of diabetes mortality were primarily clustered in countries with limited land areas or located on islands, such as Fiji, Kiribati, Eswatini, and Trinidad and Tobago. Countries with weaker economic independence are more likely to have higher diabetes mortality rates. In addition, the impact of socioeconomic and environmental factors was significant at the country level, involving health expenditure, number of physicians, household and ambient air pollution, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Notably, the spatial relationship between diabetes mortality and ambient air pollution, as well as alcohol consumption, showed negative correlations. Countries with high diabetes mortality rates generally had lower levels of ambient air pollution and alcohol consumption. Conclusion: The study highlights the spatial clustering of diabetes mortality and its substantial variation. While many risk factors can influence diabetes mortality, it's also essential to consider the level of these factors at the country level. Tailoring appropriate interventions based on specific national circumstances holds the potential to more effectively mitigate the burden of diabetes mortality.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Global Health , Spatial Analysis , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Mortality/trends , Air Pollution/adverse effects
16.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1387272, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686205

ABSTRACT

Objective: Obesity, hypertension and diabetes are high prevalent that are often associated with poor outcomes. They have become major global health concern. Little research has been done on the impact of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) on outcomes in these patients. Thus, we aimed to explore the association between LMR and all-cause mortality in obese hypertensive patients with diabetes and without diabetes. Methods: The researchers analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2018), which included 4,706 participants. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to compare survival rate between different groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models with trend tests and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis and were used to investigate the relationship between the LMR and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess whether there was an interaction between the variables. Results: The study included a total of 4706 participants with obese hypertension (48.78% male), of whom 960 cases (20.40%) died during follow-up (median follow-up of 90 months). Kaplan-Meier curves suggested a remarkable decrease in all-cause mortality with increasing LMR value in patients with diabetes and non-diabetes (P for log-rank test < 0.001). Moreover, multivariable Cox models demonstrated that the risk of mortality was considerably higher in the lowest quartile of the LMR and no linear trend was observed (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the RCS analysis indicated a non-linear decline in the risk of death as LMR values increased (P for nonlinearity < 0.001). Conclusions: Increased LMR is independently related with reduced all-cause mortality in patients with obese hypertension, regardless of whether they have combined diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension , Lymphocytes , Monocytes , Nutrition Surveys , Obesity , Humans , Male , Female , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/mortality , Hypertension/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/blood , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Aged , Follow-Up Studies
17.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 356, 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649828

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI) index and mortality in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between TyG-BMI with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among elderly DM patients in the United States (US). METHODS: Patients aged over 60 years with DM from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2016) were included in this study. The study endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and the morality data were extracted from the National Death Index (NDI) which records up to December 31, 2019. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore the association between TyG-BMI index with mortality. Restricted cubic spline was used to model nonlinear relationships. RESULTS: A total of 1363 elderly diabetic patients were included, and were categorized into four quartiles. The mean age was 70.0 ± 6.8 years, and 48.6% of them were female. Overall, there were 429 all-cause deaths and 123 cardiovascular deaths were recorded during a median follow-up of 77.3 months. Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that compared to the 1st quartile (used as the reference), the 3rd quartile demonstrated a significant association with all-cause mortality (model 2: HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P = 0.009; model 3: HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.96, P = 0.030). Additionally, the 4th quartile was significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality (model 2: HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.01-3.30, P = 0.047; model 3: HR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.07-5.57, P = 0.033). The restricted cubic spline revealed a U-shaped association between TyG-BMI index with all-cause mortality and a linear association with cardiovascular mortality, after adjustment for possible confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: A U-shaped association was observed between the TyG-BMI index with all-cause mortality and a linear association was observed between the TyG-BMI index with cardiovascular mortality in elderly patients with DM in the US population.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Nutrition Surveys , Triglycerides , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Nutrition Surveys/methods , Nutrition Surveys/trends , United States/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Triglycerides/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Glucose/analysis , Cause of Death/trends , Middle Aged
18.
Clin Nutr ; 43(5): 1117-1124, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The relationship between diet and health, particularly the role of carbohydrates, has been extensively studied. However, carbohydrate intake based on individual health conditions remains unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate whether the association between carbohydrate intake and all-cause mortality varied between individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: This prospective cohort study used data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). Overall, 143,050 participants were included, with 10.1% having DM. Dietary intake was assessed using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between carbohydrate intake and mortality after adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: The study showed that 5436 deaths occurred during the median follow-up period of 10.1 years. A significant interaction between carbohydrate intake and DM was observed in the study population (interaction p = 0.061). Higher carbohydrate intake proportion was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality among individuals with DM (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], p-value = 1.10 [1.01-1.20], p = 0.032). Conversely, no association was observed between the proportion of carbohydrate intake and all-cause mortality in participants without DM. Additionally, both total sugar and added sugar intakes were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in participants with DM (adjusted HR, p-value = 1.02 [1.01-1.04], p < 0.001 and 1.18 [1.13-1.24], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High carbohydrate (%) and added sugar intake were associated with an increased mortality risk in individuals with DM. Reducing carbohydrate intake and opting for healthy carbohydrates to mitigate mortality risk may be beneficial for individuals with DM, particularly when compared with the general population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Dietary Carbohydrates , Humans , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Cause of Death
19.
Br J Gen Pract ; 74(742): e347-e354, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite many benefits of continuity of care with a named regular GP (RGP), continuity is deteriorating in many countries. AIM: To investigate the association between RGP continuity and mortality, in a personal list system, in addition to examining how breaches in continuity affect this association for patients with chronic diseases. DESIGN AND SETTING: A registry-based observational study using Norwegian primary care consultation data for patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, or heart failure. METHOD: The Usual Provider of Care (UPC, value 0-1) Index was used to measure both disease-related (UPCdisease) and overall (UPCall) continuity with the RGP at the time of consultation. In most analyses, patients who changed RGP during the study period were excluded. In the combined group of all four chronic conditions, the proportion of consultations with other GPs and out-of-hours services was calculated. Cox regression models calculated the associations between continuity during 2013-2016 and mortality in 2017-2018. RESULTS: Patients with COPD with UPCdisease <0.25 had 47% increased risk of dying within 2 years (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.22 to 1.64) compared with those with UPCdisease ≥0.75. Mortality also increased with decreasing UPCdisease for patients with heart failure and decreasing UPCall for those with diabetes. In the combined group of chronic conditions, mortality increased with decreasing UPCall. This latter association was also found for patients who had changed RGP. CONCLUSION: Higher disease-related and overall RGP UPC are both associated with lower mortality. However, changing RGP did not significantly affect mortality, indicating a compensatory benefit of informational and management continuity in a patient list system.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , General Practice , Heart Failure , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Registries , Humans , Norway/epidemiology , Male , Female , Chronic Disease , Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Middle Aged , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Primary Health Care , Asthma/mortality , Adult
20.
Clín. investig. arterioscler. (Ed. impr.) ; 36(2): 80-85, mar.-abr. 2024. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231497

ABSTRACT

La diabetes, especialmente la tipo 2, está considerada como una situación de riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular aterosclerosa (ECVA). Los sujetos con diabetes tipo 2 tienen una mortalidad por ECVA 3 veces superior a la de la población general, atribuida a la hiperglucemia y a la frecuente asociación de otros factores de riesgo cardiovascular, como la dislipidemia aterogénica. Numerosas sociedades científicas han establecido una clasificación de riesgo de ECVA en la diabetes basada en 3 grados (moderado, alto y muy alto). Los objetivos del control de la dislipidemia están claramente definidos y aceptados, y varían dependiendo del riesgo cardiovascular previamente establecido. En el riesgo moderado o intermedio, las guías proponen una intervención menos intensiva, manteniendo cifras de c-LDL<100mg/dL y de c-no-HDL<130mg/dL, y esperar 10 años hasta alcanzar la categoría de alto riesgo para iniciar un tratamiento más intensivo. Sin embargo, durante la década de seguimiento preconizada en las guías, el depósito de colesterol en la pared arterial va aumentando, facilitando el desarrollo de una placa de ateroma inestable e inflamatoria, y el desarrollo de ECVA. Alternativamente, se podría considerar desde el inicio que la diabetes conlleva una situación de alto riesgo y el objetivo debería ser c-LDL<70mg/dL. Además, mantener cifras de c-LDL<70mg/dL contribuye a reducir y estabilizar la placa de ateroma, evitando o disminuyendo episodios de mortalidad por ECVA durante esos años de evolución de la diabetes. ¿Deberíamos mantener los objetivos propuestos en los sujetos con diabetes y riesgo moderado durante una década hasta alcanzar la fase de alto riesgo cardiovascular o, por el contrario, adoptar desde el inicio una postura más intensiva buscando reducir el riesgo cardiovascular en la mayoría de los pacientes con diabetes? ¿Es mejor esperar o prevenir con medidas terapéuticas efectivas desde el primer momento? (AU)


Diabetes, especially type 2, is considered a risk situation for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Subjects with diabetes type 2 have a mortality rate due to ASCVD 3 times higher than that found in the general population, attributed to hyperglycemia and the frequent association of other cardiovascular risk factors, such as atherogenic dyslipidemia. Numerous scientific societies have established a risk classification for ASCVD in diabetes based on 3 degrees (moderate, high and very high). The objectives of dyslipidemia control are clearly defined and accepted, and vary depending on the previously established cardiovascular risk. In moderate or intermediate risk, the guidelines propose a less intensive intervention, maintaining LDL-C levels<100mg/dL and NO-HDL-C levels<130mg/dL, and waiting 10 years until reaching the high-risk category to initiate more intensive treatment. However, during the decade of follow-up recommended in the guidelines, cholesterol deposition in the arterial wall increases, facilitating the development of an unstable and inflammatory atheromatous plaque, and the development of ASCVD. Alternatively, diabetes could be considered from the outset to be a high-risk situation and the goal should be LDL-C<70mg/dL. Furthermore, maintaining LDL-C levels<70mg/dL contributes to reducing and stabilizing atheromatous plaque, avoiding or reducing mortality episodes due to ASCVD during those years of diabetes evolution. Should we maintain the proposed objectives in subjects with diabetes and moderate risk for a decade until reaching the high cardiovascular risk phase or, on the contrary, should we adopt a more intensive stance from the beginning seeking to reduce cardiovascular risk in the majority of patients with diabetes? Is it better to wait or prevent with effective therapeutic measures from the first moment? (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Arteriosclerosis/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Risk Assessment , Dyslipidemias
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...