Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 16.543
Filter
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 212: 111723, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830484

ABSTRACT

Applicability of smartphone-based digital health in diabetes management still face challenges due tolow user retention or engagement. Thus, this systematic and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the dropout rate from the clinical trials. Search of literature was performedon 4 September 2023 through various databases (PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science). Those reporting clinical trials of smartphone apps for diabetic controls (either type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus) were screened and selected in accordance with PRISMA guideline. Of 5,429 identified records, as many as 36 studies were found eligible with a total of 3,327 patients in the intervention group. The overall dropout rate was 29.6 % (95 %CI: 25 %-34.3 %) with high heterogeneity (p-Het < 0.001;I2 = 84.84 %). Sample size, intervention duration, patients' age and gender, and cultural adaptation on the app appeared to be non-significant moderators (p > 0.05). In sub-group levels, notably high dropout rates were observed in studies performing cultural adaptation (34.6 %) and conducted in high-income countries (31.9 %). Given the high dropout rate, the engagement level toward diabetic management apps in real-world setting is expected to be low. High heterogeneity in this study, however, requires careful interpretation of the foregoing results. PROSPERO: CRD42023460365 (14 September 2023).


Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Patient Dropouts , Smartphone , Humans , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy
2.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1305304, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827607

ABSTRACT

Background: With the rapid increase in the prevalence of DM, studies on the awareness, treatment, and control of this condition are essential. Therefore, this study aimed to review the literature and pool the awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes at the global, regional, and national levels. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, several databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, Institute of Scientific Information (ISI), Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched using appropriate keywords up to June 2022. Observational studies investigating the awareness, treatment, and control of glucose levels among diabetic individuals were included. Awareness, treatment, and control were defined as the proportion of participants who were aware of their diabetes condition, treated pharmacologically, and achieved adequate glucose control, respectively. Two investigators independently conducted the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Heterogeneity among studies was calculated using Chi-square, and a random-effect meta-analysis was used to pool the rates. Results: A total of 233 studies published between 1985 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies had a combined population of 12,537,968. The pooled awareness of DM was 60% (95%CI: 56-63) and ranged from 41% (25-57) in low-income countries to 68% (64-72) in high-income countries, with no significant trend observed over the assessed periods at the global level. The pooled treatment of DM globally was 45% (42-48) and varied from 37% (31-43) in lower-middle-income countries to 53% (47-59) in high-income countries, showing variation over the examined time period. Before 2000, the proportion of adequate DM control was 16% (12-20), which significantly improved and reached 22% (19-25) after 2010. The pooled awareness, treatment, and control of DM were higher in females, high-income countries, and urban areas compared to males, upper and lower-middle-income countries, and rural areas, respectively. The older adults population had higher awareness and treatment rates than the adult population, but their DM control did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Despite the high level of awareness and treatment among the diabetic population, treatment success (control) is considerably low, particularly in low-income countries and rural areas. It is crucial to improve awareness, treatment, and control by strengthening the primary care system in all countries.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Global Health , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Male , Female
3.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 91(6): 353-360, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830704

ABSTRACT

Diabetes technology is evolving rapidly and is changing the way both patients and clinicians approach the management of diabetes. With more devices gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval and insurance coverage expanding, these new technologies are being widely adopted by people living with diabetes. We provide a summary of the commonly available devices in the market today that clinicians will likely encounter. This includes continuous glucose monitors (CGMs); connected insulin pens, caps, and buttons; and insulin pumps. Clinicians' awareness of and familiarity with this technology will enhance its accessibility for patients with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Diabetes Mellitus , Insulin Infusion Systems , Humans , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose/analysis
5.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0298182, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations due to diabetes complications are potentially preventable with effective management of the condition in the outpatient setting. Diabetes-related hospitalization (DRH) rates can provide valuable information about access, utilization, and efficacy of healthcare services. However, little is known about the local geographic distribution of DRH rates in Florida. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the geographic distribution of DRH rates at the ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) level in Florida, identify significant local clusters of high hospitalization rates, and describe characteristics of ZCTAs within the observed spatial clusters. METHODS: Hospital discharge data from 2016 to 2019 were obtained from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration through a Data Use Agreement with the Florida Department of Health. Raw and spatial empirical Bayes smoothed DRH rates were computed at the ZCTA level. High-rate DRH clusters were identified using Tango's flexible spatial scan statistic. Choropleth maps were used to display smoothed DRH rates and significant high-rate spatial clusters. Demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare-related characteristics of cluster and non-cluster ZCTAs were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. RESULTS: There was a total of 554,133 diabetes-related hospitalizations during the study period. The statewide DRH rate was 8.5 per 1,000 person-years, but smoothed rates at the ZCTA level ranged from 0 to 101.9. A total of 24 significant high-rate spatial clusters were identified. High-rate clusters had a higher percentage of rural ZCTAs (60.9%) than non-cluster ZCTAs (41.8%). The median percent of non-Hispanic Black residents was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher in cluster ZCTAs than in non-cluster ZCTAs. Populations of cluster ZCTAs also had significantly (p < 0.0001) lower median income and educational attainment, and higher levels of unemployment and poverty compared to the rest of the state. In addition, median percent of the population with health insurance coverage and number of primary care physicians per capita were significantly (p < 0.0001) lower in cluster ZCTAs than in non-cluster ZCTAs. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified geographic disparities of DRH rates at the ZCTA level in Florida. The identification of high-rate DRH clusters provides useful information to guide resource allocation such that communities with the highest burdens are prioritized to reduce the observed disparities. Future research will investigate determinants of hospitalization rates to inform public health planning, resource allocation and interventions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hospitalization , Humans , Florida/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Aged , Adolescent , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Bayes Theorem , Spatial Analysis , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Child , Socioeconomic Factors , Infant
7.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1347396, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841304

ABSTRACT

Background: Self-efficacy is a popular psychological concept that refers to an individual's perception or belief in his ability to perform specific actions. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of self-efficacy, measured using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SEM6S) questionnaire, for diabetes management and overall well-being in patients with diabetes. Subject and methods: An anonymous online cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the self-efficacy of diabetic patients in the Asser region of Saudi Arabia. The participants were requested to upload their most recent glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measurements taken in the last three months, which helped in the accurate categorization of their diabetes as either controlled or uncontrolled. We used the valid Arabic version of the SEM6S and WHO-5 well-being questionnaires to assess patient self-efficacy and well-being. Results: A cohort of 342 patients was enrolled in the study, 67.25% were married, their mean age was 43.17 ± 17.61 years, and 52.69% had university-level or higher education. Among the participants, 46.0% exhibited well-being, while 24.9% reported poor well-being, including 9.4% who were identified as experiencing depression. The mean scores of self-efficacy and well-being were significantly higher among those with controlled diabetes versus uncontrolled diabetes (40.86 ± 13.26 vs. 36.48 ± 13.26) and (67.35 ± 21.22 vs. 60.93 ± 25.05), respectively. The predictors of glycemic control were self-efficacy [Odds ratio (OR)=1.03 (95%CI, 1.01-1.06, P=0.002], having other chronic diseases [OR=3.25 (95%CI), P<0.001], having type 1 diabetes [OR=7.16, 95%CI, P=0.005], being Saudi [OR=7.67, (95%CI, P=0.027], working in a public sector [OR=0.15, (95%CI, 0.05-0.44), P=0.005], being unemployed [OR=0.19, (95%CI, 0.06-0.59), P=0.005], being a smoker [OR=0.44, 95%CI, 0.19-0.98, P=0.048], and duration of diabetes between 6-10 years [OR= 0.33, 95%CI, 0.11-0.95), P=0.043] or more than 10 years OR=0.32, 95%CI, 0.12-0.86), P=0.026]. The main determinants of well-being were having self-efficacy [OR=1.07 (95%CI, 1.04-1.09), P = 0.0001], having public health insurance [OR=4.36 (95%CI, P=0.015], and education level (read and write) [OR=0.13 (95%CI,.02-.70), P=0.021]. Conclusions: The study reveals that non-modifiable and modifiable factors, including self-efficacy, play a crucial role in diabetes control. The study recommends providing targeted educational interventions, using different social media platforms, psychosocial support programs, and inclusive healthcare policies to improve diabetes control and mental well-being among diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Self Efficacy , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology
8.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1375227, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846619

ABSTRACT

Background: Diabetes and hypertension are leading public health problems, particularly affecting low- and middle-income countries, with considerable variations in the care continuum between different age, socio-economic, and rural and urban groups. In this qualitative study, examining the factors affecting access to healthcare in Kerala, we aim to explore the healthcare-seeking pathways of people living with diabetes and hypertension. Methods: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion (FGD) on a purposive sample of people living with diabetes and hypertension. Participants were recruited at four primary care facilities in Malappuram district of Kerala. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed deductively and inductively using thematic analysis underpinned by Levesque et al.'s framework. Results: The patient journey in managing diabetes and hypertension is complex, involving multiple entry and exit points within the healthcare system. Patients did not perceive Primary Health Centres (PHCs) as their initial points of access to healthcare, despite recognizing their value for specific services. Numerous social, cultural, economic, and health system determinants underpinned access to healthcare. These included limited patient knowledge of their condition, self-medication practices, lack of trust/support, high out-of-pocket expenditure, unavailability of medicines, physical distance to health facilities, and attitude of healthcare providers. Conclusion: The study underscores the need to improve access to timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care for diabetes and hypertension at the lower level of the healthcare system. Currently, primary healthcare services do not align with the "felt needs" of the community. Practical recommendations to address the social, cultural, economic, and health system determinants include enabling and empowering people with diabetes and hypertension and their families to engage in self-management, improving existing health information systems, ensuring the availability of diagnostics and first-line drug therapy for diabetes and hypertension, and encouraging the use of single-pill combination (SPC) medications to reduce pill burden. Ensuring equitable access to drugs may improve hypertension and diabetes control in most disadvantaged groups. Furthermore, a more comprehensive approach to healthcare policy that recognizes the interconnectedness of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their social determinants is essential.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Focus Groups , Health Services Accessibility , Hypertension , Primary Health Care , Qualitative Research , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/therapy , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Male , India , Middle Aged , Female , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Interviews as Topic , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
9.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ; 32: e4167, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695429

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to understand the experiences with diabetes mellitus management of people who use insulin, in order to identify possible factors that may influence adherence to self-care and thus define their learning demands for diabetes self-management. METHOD: this is a qualitative study carried out using individual semi-structured interviews online. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and evaluated using Atlas.ti® software by means of Thematic Content Analysis, using the Health Beliefs Model as a theoretical framework. RESULTS: 11 people living with diabetes and using insulin took part in the study. Four categories were identified: understanding diabetes, how to deal with diabetes, difficulties related to insulin use and emotional adaptation. CONCLUSION: the perception of the severity of the disease, its complications and the benefits of adhering to treatment positively influences adherence to self-care behaviors. Although the study participants have lived with diabetes for many years, they are not exempt from difficulties related to insulin use and disease management, reinforcing the importance of continuing health education. In this sense, the findings of this study guide important educational themes to be worked on by health professionals to promote autonomy in diabetes self-management. BACKGROUND: (1) Perceived severity of diabetes positively influences self-care. (2) Continued health education for people who use insulin is essential. (3) The importance of recognizing the benefits of insulin in adherence to treatment. (4) Emotional aspects in diabetes management should be considered in health education.


Subject(s)
Insulin , Qualitative Research , Self-Management , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Self Care
10.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1357378, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720885

ABSTRACT

Exosomes carry proteins, metabolites, nucleic acids and lipids from their parent cell of origin. They are derived from cells through exocytosis, are ingested by target cells, and can transfer biological signals between local or distant cells. Therefore, exosomes are often modified in reaction to pathological processes, including infection, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and in response to metabolic perturbations such as obesity and diabetes, all of which involve a significant inflammatory aspect. Here, we discuss how immune cell-derived exosomes origin from neutrophils, T lymphocytes, macrophages impact on the immune reprogramming of diabetes and the associated complications. Besides, exosomes derived from stem cells and their immunomodulatory properties and anti-inflammation effect in diabetes are also reviewed. Moreover, As an important addition to previous reviews, we describes promising directions involving engineered exosomes as well as current challenges of clinical applications in diabetic therapy. Further research on exosomes will explore their potential in translational medicine and provide new avenues for the development of effective clinical diagnostics and therapeutic strategies for immunoregulation of diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Exosomes , Immunomodulation , Exosomes/immunology , Exosomes/metabolism , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus/immunology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Animals , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism
11.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 37(2): 206-214, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740472

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Does telehealth decrease health disparities by improving connections to care or simply result in new barriers for vulnerable populations who often lack access to technology? This study aims to better understand the role of telehealth and social determinants of health in improving care connections and outcomes for Community Health Center patients with diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data examined the relationship between telehealth utilization and glycemic control and consistency of connection to the health care team ("connectivity"). EHR data were collected from 20 Community Health Centers from July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariable linear regression was used to assess the associations between telehealth use and engagement in care and glycemic control. RESULTS: The adjusted analysis found positive, statistically significant associations between telehealth use and each of the 2 primary outcomes. Telehealth use was associated with 0.89 additional months of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.04) and 4.49 additional months of connection to care (95% CI, 4.27 to 4.70). DISCUSSION: The demonstrated increased engagement in primary care for telehealth users is significant and encouraging as Community Health Center populations are at greater risk of lapses in care and loss to follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can be a highly effective, patient-centered form of care for people with diabetes. Telehealth can play a critical role in keeping vulnerable patients with diabetes connected to their care team and involved in care and may be an important tool for reducing health disparities.


Subject(s)
Community Health Centers , Diabetes Mellitus , Glycated Hemoglobin , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Aged , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Social Determinants of Health , Glycemic Control/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data
12.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 525, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730313

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many health professions education programs involve people with lived experience as expert speakers. Such presentations may help learners better understand the realities of living with chronic illness or experiencing an acute health problem. However, lectures from only one or a small number of people may not adequately illustrate the perspectives and experiences of a diverse patient cohort. Additionally, logistical constraints such as public health restrictions or travel barriers may impede in-person presentations, particularly among people who have more restrictions on their time. Health professions education programs may benefit from understanding the potential effects of online patient-led presentations with a diverse set of speakers. We aimed to explore whether patient-led online learning modules about diabetes care would influence learners' responses to clinical scenarios and to collect learners' feedback about the modules. METHOD: This within-subjects randomized experiment involved 26 third-year medical students at Université Laval in Quebec, Canada. Participation in the experiment was an optional component within a required course. Prior to the intervention, participating learners responded to three clinical scenarios randomly selected from a set of six such scenarios. Each participant responded to the other three scenarios after the intervention. The intervention consisted of patient-led online learning modules incorporating segments of narratives from 21 patient partners (11 racialized or Indigenous) describing why and how clinicians could provide patient-centered care. Working with clinical teachers and psychometric experts, we developed a scoring grid based on the biopsychosocial model and set 0.6 as a passing score. Independent evaluators, blinded to whether each response was collected before or after the intervention, then scored learners' responses to scenarios using the grid. We used Fisher's Exact test to compare proportions of passing scores before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Learners' overall percentage of passing scores prior to the intervention was 66%. Following the intervention, the percentage of passing scores was 76% (p = 0.002). Overall, learners expressed appreciation and other positive feedback regarding the patient-led online learning modules. DISCUSSION: Findings from this experiment suggest that learners can learn to provide better patient-centered care by watching patient-led online learning modules created in collaboration with a diversity of patient partners.


Subject(s)
Education, Distance , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Patient Participation , Patient-Centered Care , Pilot Projects , Quebec , Students, Medical/psychology
13.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 22(1): 57, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations have increased risk of developing diabetes and experience poorer treatment outcomes than the general population. The FORGE AHEAD program partnered with First Nations communities across Canada to improve access to resources by developing community-driven primary healthcare models. METHODS: This was an economic assessment of FORGE AHEAD using a payer perspective. Costs of diabetes management and complications during the 18-month intervention were compared to the costs prior to intervention implementation. Cost-effectiveness of the program assessed incremental differences in cost and number of resources utilization events (pre and post). Primary outcome was all-cause hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were specialist visits, clinic visits and community resource use. Data were obtained from a diabetes registry and published literature. Costs are expressed in 2023 Can$. RESULTS: Study population was ~ 60.5 years old; 57.2% female; median duration of diabetes of 8 years; 87.5% residing in non-isolated communities; 75% residing in communities < 5000 members. Total cost of implementation was $1,221,413.60 and cost/person $27.89. There was increase in the number and cost of hospitalizations visits from 8/$68,765.85 (pre period) to 243/$2,735,612.37. Specialist visits, clinic visits and community resource use followed this trend. CONCLUSION: Considering the low cost of intervention and increased care access, FORGE AHEAD represents a successful community-driven partnership resulting in improved access to resources.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus , Health Services, Indigenous , Hospitalization , Primary Health Care , Humans , Primary Health Care/economics , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/economics , Canada , Health Services, Indigenous/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Aged , Health Services Accessibility , Health Care Costs , Indians, North American , Indigenous Peoples , Adult , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Diabetes Complications/economics
15.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303624, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768080

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The human and material resources as well as the systems for managing diabetes in Africa are inadequate. This study or needs assessment, aimed at updating the human and material resources, identifying the gaps and unmet needs for comprehensive diabetes care in Ghana. METHODS: We conducted a national audit of 122 facilities in all 16 administrative regions of Ghana. Information obtained covered areas on personnel and multidisciplinary teams, access to medications, access to laboratory services, financing, screening services, management of diabetes complications, and availability/use of diabetes guidelines or protocols. Data was analysed using STATA version 16.1. P-values <0.05 were set as significant. RESULTS: Only 85(69.7%) out of the 122 surveyed facilities had a dedicated centre or service for diabetes care. Twenty-eight (23%) had trained diabetes doctors/specialists; and whilst most centres had ophthalmic nurses and dieticians, majority of them did not have trained diabetes educators (nurses), psychologists, ophthalmologists, podiatrists, and foot/vascular surgeons. Also, 13.9% had monofilaments, none could perform urine dipstick for microalbumin; 5 (4.1%) and just over 50% could perform laboratory microalbumin estimation and glycated haemoglobin, respectively. Access to and supply of human insulins was better than analogue insulin in most centres. Nearly 100% of the institutions surveyed had access to metformin and sulphonylurea with good to excellent supply in most cases, whilst access to Sodium Glucose Transporter-2 inhibitors and Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues were low, and moderate for Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and thiazolidinediones. Majority of the health facilities (95.1%) offered NHIS as payment mechanism for clients, whilst 68.0% and 30.3% of the patients paid for services using out-of-pocket and private insurance respectively. Fifteen facilities (12.3%) had Diabetes Support Groups in their locality and catchment areas. CONCLUSION: An urgent multisectoral collaboration, including prioritisation of resources at the facility level, to promote and achieve acceptable comprehensive diabetes care is required.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Ghana/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Health Services Accessibility
16.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0294917, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes in West Africa is increasing, posing a major public health threat. An estimated 24 million Africans have diabetes, with rates in West Africa around 2-6% and projected to rise 129% by 2045 according to the WHO. Over 90% of cases are Type 2 diabetes (IDF, World Bank). As diabetes is ambulatory care sensitive, good primary care is crucial to reduce complications and mortality. However, research on factors influencing diabetes primary care access, utilisation and quality in West Africa remains limited despite growing disease burden. While research has emphasised diabetes prevalence and risk factors in West Africa, there remains limited evidence on contextual influences on primary care. This scoping review aims to address these evidence gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the established methodology by Arksey and O'Malley, this scoping review will undergo six stages. The review will adopt the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to ensure methodological rigour. We will search four electronic databases and search through grey literature sources to thoroughly explore the topic. The identified articles will undergo thorough screening. We will collect data using a standardised data extraction form that covers study characteristics, population demographics, and study methods. The study will identify key themes and sub-themes related to primary healthcare access, utilisation, and quality. We will then analyse and summarise the data using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: The findings and conclusive report will be finished and sent to a peer-reviewed publication within six months. CONCLUSION: This review protocol aims to systematically examine and assess the factors that impact the access, utilisation, and standard of primary healthcare services for diabetes in West Africa.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Primary Health Care , Humans , Africa, Western/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
18.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 24(1): 72, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management (DSM) helps people with diabetes to become actors in their disease. Deprived populations are particularly affected by diabetes and are less likely to have access to these programmes. DSM implementation in primary care, particularly in a multi-professional primary care practice (MPCP), is a valuable strategy to promote care access for these populations. In Rennes (Western France), a DSM programme was designed by a MPCP in a socio-economically deprived area. The study objective was to compare diabetes control in people who followed or not this DSM programme. METHOD: The historical cohort of patients who participated in the DSM programme at the MPCP between 2017 and 2019 (n = 69) was compared with patients who did not participate in the programme, matched on sex, age, diabetes type and place of the general practitioner's practice (n = 138). The primary outcome was glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change between 12 months before and 12 months after the DSM programme. Secondary outcomes included modifications in diabetes treatment, body mass index, blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, presence of microalbuminuria, and diabetes retinopathy screening participation. RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly improved in the exposed group after the programme (p < 0.01). The analysis did not find any significant between-group difference in socio-demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, and treatment adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: These results, consistent with the international literature, promote the development of DSM programmes in primary care settings in deprived areas. The results of this real-life study need to be confirmed on the long-term and in different contexts (rural area, healthcare organisation).


Subject(s)
Glycated Hemoglobin , Primary Health Care , Self-Management , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Self-Management/methods , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Aged , France/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Follow-Up Studies
19.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303030, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited access to diabetes care services at primary care facilities in Malawi. Assessing the capacity of facilities to provide diabetes care is an initial step to integrating services at primary care. AIM: To assess the preparedness for delivering diabetes services at primary care level within the Blantyre District Health Office (DHO) to support the response to NCD epidemic in Malawi. SETTING: Blantyre DHO primary care facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed methods approach nested in a national needs assessment for NCD response in Malawi was used. Fourteen primary healthcare facilities from Blantyre DHO were assessed. A tool adapted from the WHO rapid assessment questionnaire was used to identify human resource, equipment, supplies, and medication needed for comprehensive diabetes care. Descriptive statistics were done to analyze the quantitative data. Fisher's exact test was used to assess if there was a statistically significant difference between urban and rural facilities. Seventeen health care workers from the selected facilities participated in key informant interviews. Framework analysis method guided the qualitative data analysis. The quantitative and qualitative data were merged and displayed jointly. RESULTS: The quantitative assessment showed that none of the facilities assessed had capacity to provide all the interventions recommended by WHO for diabetes care at primary level. Eight (57%) of the facilities had the capacity to diagnose diabetes, monitor glucose, prevent limb amputations and manage hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: differences in level of preparedness and implementation of diabetes care; disparities in resources between urban and rural facilities; low utilization of diabetes services; and strategy and policy recommendations for improvement of diabetes care. CONCLUSION: Inadequate health financing resulted in significant disparities in the available resources between the rural and urban facilities to offer diabetes care services. There is need to develop national policies and guidelines for diabetes care to strengthen the capacity of primary care facilities to facilitate achievement of universal health coverage.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Primary Health Care , Malawi/epidemiology , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Health Services Accessibility
20.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 58(5): 615-621, 2024 May 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715500

ABSTRACT

Objective: Employing the cascade care model, this qualitative study explores determinants influencing the cascading care stages of hypertension and diabetes by interviewing various stakeholders. Methods: In July 2023, purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants from Gongyi and Wugang cities in Henan Province, and Linqu County in Weifang City, Shandong Province. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives of policymakers, healthcare institution managers, providers, and patients with hypertension and diabetes.And thematic analysis was performed using both inductive and deductive approaches. Results: A total of 82 individuals were interviewed, with an age range of (53.8±12.0) years, among which 48 (58.5%) were male; including 5 policymakers, 10 institutional managers, 20 healthcare providers, and 47 patients with hypertension and diabetes. The study identified both barriers and facilitating factors at the patient, healthcare provider, and system levels across various stages: awareness, screening, diagnosis, treatment, long-term management, and control of hypertension and diabetes. Conclusion: By delineating and analyzing the barriers and facilitators at each stage of hypertension and diabetes care, this study lays the groundwork for the development of effective, feasible, and sustainable implementation pathways, with significant implications for the enhanced management of hypertension and diabetes in China.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension , Qualitative Research , Humans , Hypertension/therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Adult , Health Personnel/psychology , China , Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...