Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.336
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0299416, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833431

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) in a Peruvian hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients treated in the Diabetic Foot Unit of a General Hospital in Lima, Peru. MDRB was defined by resistance to more than two pharmacological groups across six clinically significant genera. The primary outcome was death due to DFI complications and/or major amputation. Other outcomes included minor amputation, hospitalization, and a hospital stay longer than 14 days. Relative risks were estimated using Poisson regression for all outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 192 DFI patients with a mean age of 59.9 years; 74% were males. A total of 80.8% exhibited MDRB. The primary outcome had an incidence rate of 23.2% and 5.4% in patients with and without MDRB, respectively (p = 0.01). After adjusting for sex, age, bone involvement, severe infection, ischemia, diabetes duration, and glycosylated hemoglobin, MDRB showed no association with the primary outcome (RR 3.29; 95% CI, 0.77-13.9), but did with hospitalization longer than 14 days (RR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no association between MDRB and increased mortality and/or major amputation due to DFI complications, but did find a correlation with prolonged hospitalization. The high proportion of MDRB could limit the demonstration of the relationship. It is urgent to apply continuous evaluation of bacterial resistance, implement a rational plan for antibiotic use, and maintain biosafety to confront this threat.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Peru/epidemiology , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Length of Stay , Hospitalization
2.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 338, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847916

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a predominant complication of diabetes mellitus with poor prognosis accompanied by high amputation and mortality rates. Dang-Gui-Si-Ni decoction (DSD), as a classic formula with a long history in China, has been found to improve DFU symptoms. However, mechanism of DSD for DFU therapy remains unclear with no systematic elaboration. In vivo, following establishment of DFU rat model, DSD intervention with low, medium and high doses was done, with Metformin (DM) as a positive control group. With wound healing detection, pathological changes by HE staining, inflammatory factor expression by ELISA and qRT-PCR, oxidative stress levels by ELISA, and AGEs/RAGE/TGF-ß/Smad2/3 expression by Western blot were performed. In vitro, intervention with LY2109761 (TGF-ß pathway inhibitor) based on DSD treatment in human dermal fibroblast-adult (HDF-a) cells was made. Cell viability by CCK8, migration ability by cell scratch, apoptosis by flow cytometry, and AGEs/RAGE/TGF-ß/Smad2/3 expression by Western blot were measured. DFU rats exhibited elevated AGEs/RAGE expression, whereas decreased TGF-ß1 and p-Smad3/Smad3 protein expression, accompanied by higher IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α levels, and oxidative stress. DSD intervention reversed above effects. Glucose induction caused lower cell viability, migration, TGF-ß1 and p-Smad3/Smad3 protein expression, with increased apoptosis and AGEs/RAGE expression in HDF-a cells. These effects were reversed after DSD intervention, and further LY2109761 intervention inhibited DSD effects in cells. DSD intervention may facilitate wound healing in DFU by regulating expression of AGEs/RAGE/TGF-ß/Smad2/3, providing scientific experimental evidence for DSD clinical application for DFU therapy.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Glycation End Products, Advanced , Smad2 Protein , Smad3 Protein , Wound Healing , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/metabolism , Diabetic Foot/pathology , Animals , Wound Healing/drug effects , Rats , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/pharmacology , Smad2 Protein/metabolism , Humans , Smad3 Protein/metabolism , Glycation End Products, Advanced/metabolism , Male , Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Apoptosis/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/drug therapy , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects
3.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301767, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758936

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this study was to isolate bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers and subsequently assess their antibiotic resistance capabilities. Seventy-five patients diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were investigated. A number of these patients (97.33%) had type 2 diabetes, with a significant proportion of them having been diagnosed for 1-5 years (29.33%). Notably, a substantial number of these individuals were on insulin usage (78.66%). Among the patients under examination, 49.33% reported having no use of tobacco products, alcohol, or betel leaf. The ulcers analyzed in this study were classified into grades 1-5 according to the Wagner scale. Wagner grade 2 diabetic foot ulcers had the highest number of culture-positive patients, at 33.33%. Pus samples collected from patients were cultured on selective media, and bacterial identity was confirmed by biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction. A total of 141 isolates were isolated. Among the isolates, 82.97% gram-negative bacteria and 17.02% gram-positive bacteria were detected. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common isolate. Proteus spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were also detected. Approximately 61.33% of the ulcers exhibited were polybacterial. In this study, it was observed that all bacterial isolates, except for Proteus spp., were primarily detected in patients classified under Wagner's grade 2. Moreover, antibiotic susceptibility was also tested on these 141 isolates. Among them, Escherichia coli showed the highest multidrug resistance, 81.81%. Most of the gram-negative bacteria were resistant to ampicillin. All of the gram-negative isolates exhibited high levels of susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, and these levels were Klebsiella pneumoniae (97.56%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (95.24%), Escherichia coli (81.82%), and Proteus spp. (80%). On the other hand, gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus mostly showed sensitivity towards vancomycin and norfloxacin (79.17%).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Humans , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Aged , Adult , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/microbiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11423, 2024 05 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763922

ABSTRACT

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) is increasingly used for a diverse range of wounds. Meanwhile, the topical wound irrigation solution consisting of polyhexamethylene biguanide and betaine (PHMB-B) has shown efficacy in managing wound infections. However, the effectiveness of this solution as a topical instillation solution for NPWTi-d in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) has not been thoroughly studied. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of using PHMB-B as the instillation solution during NPWTi-d on reducing bioburden and improving clinical outcomes in patients with DFIs. Between January 2017 and December 2022, a series of patients with DFIs received treatment with NPWTi-d, using either PHMB-B or normal saline as the instillation solution. Data collected retrospectively included demographic information, baseline wound characteristics, and treatment outcomes. The study included 61 patients in the PHMB-B group and 73 patients in the normal saline group, all diagnosed with DFIs. In comparison to patients treated with normal saline, patients with PHMB-B exhibited no significant differences in terms of wound bed preparation time (P = 0.5034), length of hospital stay (P = 0.6783), NPWTi-d application times (P = 0.1458), duration of systematic antimicrobial administration (P = 0.3567), or overall cost of hospitalization (P = 0.6713). The findings of the study suggest that the use of either PHMB-B or normal saline as an instillation solution in NPWTi-d for DFIs shows promise and effectiveness, yet no clinical distinction was observed between the two solutions.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Biguanides , Diabetic Foot , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Saline Solution , Wound Healing , Humans , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Male , Female , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Saline Solution/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Aged , Biguanides/therapeutic use , Biguanides/administration & dosage , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wound Infection/drug therapy , Wound Infection/therapy , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Betaine/administration & dosage , Betaine/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
5.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 198: 106800, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754593

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcers were a significant complication of diabetes and were accompanied by delayed wound healing. To compare the effect of topical application electrospun poly (L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and formulated porcine fibrinogen (PLCL/Fg) dressing with alginate dressing when treating diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). A single-center, prospective, randomized, patient-blinded clinical trial was conducted from July 1, 2023, to December 26, 2023. The clinical trial registration was completed on August 28, 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06014437). The eligible patients with DFUs of 1-20 cm2 present for at least 1 month and with Wagner grade 1 or 2. They were randomized 1:1 to receive PLCL/Fg or alginate dressing. Participants received PLCL/Fg dressing 1-3 times per week or alginate dressing 3 times per week for 12 weeks. A total of 52 patients (33 men [63.5 %]; mean [SD] age, 63.1 [11.9] years; mean [SD] diabetes time, 8.3 [4.6] years) with DFUs were assessed for this study. The DFUs classified as Wagner grade 1 or 2 (mean [SD] ulcer area, 3.8 [3.2] cm2) were randomized to receive either the PLCL/Fg dressing (n = 26) or the alginate dressing (n = 26) for as long as 12 weeks. In this study, the incidence of complete healing included 22 patients (91.7 %) in the PLCL/Fg group and 14 (63.6 %) in the alginate group during the 12-week treatment period (P = 0.003). The treatment-related adverse events that occurred were 5 (20.8 %) in the PLCL/Fg group and 4 (18.1 %) in the comparator group. In this randomized clinical trial, PLCL/Fg dressing showed beneficial effects in DFUs treatment of wound surface reduction and regulating the wound microenvironment.


Subject(s)
Alginates , Diabetic Foot , Fibrinogen , Polyesters , Wound Healing , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Polyesters/chemistry , Polyesters/administration & dosage , Animals , Wound Healing/drug effects , Aged , Alginates/chemistry , Alginates/administration & dosage , Swine , Prospective Studies , Bandages , Treatment Outcome
6.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1326179, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774229

ABSTRACT

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this substudy (Eudra CT No:2019-001997-27)was to assess ATB availability in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers(IDFUs)in the context of microcirculation and macrocirculation status. Methods: For this substudy, we enrolled 23 patients with IDFU. Patients were treated with boluses of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid(AMC)(12patients) or ceftazidime(CTZ)(11patients). After induction of a steady ATB state, microdialysis was performed near the IDFU. Tissue fluid samples from the foot and blood samples from peripheral blood were taken within 6 hours. ATB potential efficacy was assessed by evaluating the maximum serum and tissue ATB concentrations(Cmax and Cmax-tissue)and the percentage of time the unbound drug tissue concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)(≥100% tissue and ≥50%/60% tissue fT>MIC). Vascular status was assessed by triplex ultrasound, ankle-brachial and toe-brachial index tests, occlusive plethysmography comprising two arterial flow phases, and transcutaneous oxygen pressure(TcPO2). Results: Following bolus administration, the Cmax of AMC was 91.8 ± 52.5 µgmL-1 and the Cmax-tissue of AMC was 7.25 ± 4.5 µgmL-1(P<0.001). The Cmax for CTZ was 186.8 ± 44.1 µgmL-1 and the Cmax-tissue of CTZ was 18.6 ± 7.4 µgmL-1(P<0.0001). Additionally, 67% of patients treated with AMC and 55% of those treated with CTZ achieved tissue fT>MIC levels exceeding 50% and 60%, respectively. We observed positive correlations between both Cmax-tissue and AUCtissue and arterial flow. Specifically, the correlation coefficient for the first phase was r=0.42; (P=0.045), and for the second phase, it was r=0.55(P=0.01)and r=0.5(P=0.021). Conclusions: Bactericidal activity proved satisfactory in only half to two-thirds of patients with IDFUs, an outcome that appears to correlate primarily with arterial flow.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Diabetic Foot , Microcirculation , Humans , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/metabolism , Microcirculation/drug effects , Male , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Aged , Administration, Intravenous
7.
J Mater Chem B ; 12(22): 5525-5534, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38746970

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcers are a significant complication affecting roughly 15% of diabetic patients. These chronic wounds can be incredibly burdensome, leading to high treatment costs, potential amputations, and additional health complications. Microbiological studies reveal that bacterial infections are the primary culprit behind delayed wound healing. To solve the problem of infection at the wound site, the most fundamental thing is to kill the pathogenic bacteria. Herein, a neoteric strategy to construct novel antibacterial hydrogel COA-T3 that combined photosensitizers (PSs) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) via covalent coupling was proposed. Hydrogel COA-T3 composed of quaternized chitosan (QCS) and oxidized dextran (OD) was constructed for co-delivery of the photosensitizer TPI-PN and the antimicrobial peptide HHC10. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated remarkable effectiveness of COA-T3 against drug-resistant bacteria. Furthermore, the hydrogel significantly promoted healing of diabetic infected wounds. This enhanced antibacterial activity is attributed to the pH-sensitive release of both PSs and AMPs within the hydrogel. Additionally, COA-T3 exhibits excellent biocompatibility, making it a promising candidate for wound dressing materials. These findings indicated that the COA-T3 hydrogel is a promising wound dressing material for promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers by providing an environment conducive to improved wound healing in diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Biofilms , Hydrogels , Wound Healing , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemical synthesis , Hydrogels/chemistry , Hydrogels/pharmacology , Hydrogels/chemical synthesis , Biofilms/drug effects , Wound Healing/drug effects , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Animals , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Antimicrobial Peptides/chemistry , Antimicrobial Peptides/pharmacology , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Photosensitizing Agents/chemical synthesis , Chitosan/chemistry , Chitosan/pharmacology
8.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 123, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care professionals encounter difficulties coordinating the continuum of care between primary care providers and second-line specialists and adhere to practice guidelines pertaining to diabetic foot ulcers management. Family medicine groups are providing primary care services aimed to improve access, interdisciplinary care, coordination and quality of health services, and reduce emergency department visits. Most professionals working in family medicine groups are primary care physicians and registered nurses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interprofessional decision support tool to guide the management of diabetic foot ulcers for primary care professionals working within the family medicine group model. METHODS: A one-page decision tool developed by the research team was validated by an expert panel using a three-round Delphi protocol held between December 2019 and August 2021. The tool includes 43 individual actions and a care pathway from initial presentation to secondary prevention. Data collection was realized with both paper and electronic questionnaires, and answers were compiled in an electronic spreadsheet. Data was analyzed with use of descriptive statistics, and consensus for each item was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. RESULTS: Experts from 12 pre-identified professions of the diabetic foot ulcer interdisciplinary care team were included, 39 participants out of the 59 invited to first round (66.1%), 34 out of 39 for second (87.2%) and 22 out of 34 for third (64.7%) rounds. All items included in the final version of the decision support tool reached consensus and were deemed clear, relevant and feasible. One or more professionals were identified to be responsible for every action to be taken. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a comprehensive decision support tool to guide primary care professionals in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Implementation and evaluation in the clinical setting will need to be undertaken in the future.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Delphi Technique , Family Practice , Canada , Primary Health Care
9.
J Diabetes ; 16(4): e13537, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599855

ABSTRACT

AIM: Hydrogels with excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability can be used as the desirable dressings for the therapy of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). This review aimed to summarize the biological functions of hydrogels, combining with the pathogenesis of DFU. METHODS: The studies in the last 10 years were searched and summarized from the online database PubMed using a combination of keywords such as hydrogel and diabetes. The biological functions of hydrogels and their healing mechanism on DFU were elaborated. RESULTS: In this review, hydrogels were classified by their active substances such as drugs, cytokines, photosensitizers, and biomimetic peptide. Based on this, the biological functions of hydrogels were summarized by associating the pathogenesis of DFU, including oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, cell phenotype change, vasculopathy, and infection. This review also pointed out some of the shortcomings of hydrogels in present researches. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrogels were classified into carrier hydrogels and self-functioning hydrogels in this review. Besides, the functions and components of existing hydrogels were clarified to provide assistance for future researches and clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Hydrogels/therapeutic use , Wound Healing , Cytokines
10.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14817, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567778

ABSTRACT

This Phase 1b study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pravibismane, a novel broad-spectrum topical anti-infective, in managing moderate or severe chronic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infections. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study consisted of 39 individuals undergoing pravibismane treatment and 13 individuals in the placebo group. Assessment of safety parameters included clinical observations of tolerability and pharmacokinetics from whole blood samples. Pravibismane was well-tolerated and exhibited minimal systemic absorption, as confirmed by blood concentrations that were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.5 ng/mL) or in the low nanomolar range, which is orders of magnitude below the threshold of pharmacological relevance for pravibismane. Pravibismane treated subjects showed approximately 3-fold decrease in ulcer size compared to the placebo group (85% vs. 30%, p = 0.27). Furthermore, the incidence of ulcer-related lower limb amputations was approximately 6-fold lower (2.6%) in the pooled pravibismane group versus 15.4% in the placebo group (p = 0.15). There were no treatment emergent or serious adverse events related to study drug. The initial findings indicate that topical pravibismane was safe and potentially effective treatment for improving recovery from infected chronic ulcers by reducing ulcer size and facilitating wound healing in infected DFUs (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02723539).


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Ulcer/drug therapy
11.
Clin Lab ; 70(4)2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) leads to poor prognosis and polymicrobial infections are usually the main cause. The study is to explore the microbiological distribution, antimicrobial drug susceptibility, and risk factors of polymicrobial infections in hospitalized patients with DFI. METHODS: This retrospective study included 160 patients with DFI in Wagner's grades 2, 3, and 4. Deep necrotic tissue was used to acquire specimens for microbiological culture. VITEK-2 system and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry were used to identify the bacterial isolates. The Kirby Bauer method was used for drug susceptibility tests. RESULTS: A total of 202 pathogens were isolated. The proportion of gram-negative bacilli (GNB, 62.4%, 126 of 202) was higher than that of gram-positive cocci (GPC, 37.6%, 76 of 202). The most prevalent GPC was Staphylococcus aureus in every Wagner grade, while the most common GNB varied in different Wagner grades. Linezolid was the most effective antibiotic for GPC in different Wagner grades. Imipenem was the most effective antibiotic for GNB in Wagner grade 2. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic for GNB in Wagner grades 3 and 4. Polymicrobial infections existed only in Wagner grades 3 and 4 and increased the risk of amputation (p < 0.01). History of antibiotics, duration of diabetic foot, CRP, and lower extremity arterial disease were the independent risk factors of polymicrobial infections (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should adjust the antibiotic as needed based on the results of drug susceptibility and clinical treatment effect among different Wagner grades. Particular attention should be given to the treatment of polymicrobial infections.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Coinfection/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Risk Factors
12.
J Wound Care ; 33(4): 243-252, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573903

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of the off-label use of topical timolol as an adjunct treatment for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Furthermore, to review and analyse the existing literature regarding the use of topical timolol on wounds of varying aetiologies. METHOD: A systematic review of literature in the English language published between May 1961-May 2021 on the application of topical timolol for hard-to-heal wounds in adults was performed. Each research study was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Studies eligible for inclusion in the review were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, observational studies of at least 4 weeks' duration, case series and case studies. Search strategies were performed according to PRISMA guidelines and included MeSH terms and keyword searches. RESULTS: An initial 878 articles were identified from a search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS. Of these, 699 were reviewed for eligibility, 19 were read in full-text, and 12 were selected for inclusion in the review. In total, two RCTs and 10 observational studies, including five case studies, were analysed. All studies demonstrated efficacy and safety of topical timolol; however, statistical analysis remained limited by lack of blinding and small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: This review concludes with all currently available evidence that topical timolol may be considered as an effective and safe adjunct treatment for refractory wounds, primarily venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Given the overall safety, low cost and ease of application of topical timolol, this review provides evidence in favour of off-label use and should prompt further, more rigorous studies.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Varicose Ulcer , Adult , Humans , Timolol/therapeutic use , Wound Healing , Varicose Ulcer/therapy , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy
13.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(5): 1-7, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648245

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two 10% urea creams in patients with diabetic foot syndrome. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal, single-center, randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial that evaluated the skin quality of 20 feet belonging to 10 patients with diabetic foot syndrome after the application of two 10% urea creams purchased from pharmacies and supermarkets. RESULTS: At follow-up, 19 (95%) of the participants' feet showed improved skin quality, irrespective of the cream applied. On visual inspection, participants had a decreased presence of xerosis, hyperkeratosis, and preulcerative signs such as subkeratotic bruising and areas of redness on the dorsum of the toes. At the 3-month follow-up, nine (90%) of the participants stated that they had continued to apply the cream as a method of self-management to prevent complications. CONCLUSIONS: Creams containing 10% urea purchased in supermarkets improve foot skin quality in patients with diabetic foot syndrome, regardless of their cost. Based on these findings, the authors recommend creams containing 10% urea as a self-management tool for patients with diabetic foot syndrome.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetic Foot , Skin Cream , Urea , Humans , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/economics , Female , Double-Blind Method , Male , Middle Aged , Urea/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Skin Cream/therapeutic use , Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Treatment Outcome
14.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi ; 49(4): 1113-1121, 2024 Feb.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621918

ABSTRACT

This study systematically collected, analyzed, and evaluated randomized controlled trial(RCT) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer(DFU). The aim as provide references for future studies and to enhance the application of clinical evidence. The RCT of DFU treated with Chinese Patent Medicine was obtained and analyzed using the AI-Clinical Evidence Database of Chinese Patent Medicine(AICED-CPM). The analysis was supplemented with data from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. A total of 275 RCTs meeting the requirements were retrieved, with only 7 of them having a sample size of 200 or more. These trials involved 66 different Chinese patent medicine including 25 oral medications, 24 Chinese herbal injections, and 17 external drugs. Among the 33 different intervention/control designs identified, the most common design was Chinese patent medicine + conventional treatment vs conventional treatment(86 cases, 31.27%). Out of the 275 articles included in the literature, 50 did not provide information on the specific course of treatment(18.18%). A total of 10 counting indicators(with a frequency of 426) and 36 measuring indicators(with a frequency of 962) were utilized. The methodological quality of the RCT for the treatment of DFU with Chinese patent medicine was found to be low, with deficiencies in blind methods, other bias factors, study registration, and sample size estimation. There were noticeable shortcomings in the reporting of allocation hiding and implementation bias(blind method application). More studies should prioritize trial registration, program design, and strict quality control during implementation to provide valuable data for clinical practice and serve as a reference for future investigations.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
15.
Pharm Res ; 41(5): 967-982, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38637438

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the complications of diabetes mellitus. Clindamycin (CLY) is one of the antibiotics recommended to treat DFI, but CLY given orally and intravenously still causes many side effects. METHODS: In this study, we encapsulated CLY in a bacteria sensitive microparticle system (MP-CLY) using polycaprolactone (PCL) polymer. MP-CLY was then delivered in a separable effervescent microarray patch (MP-CLY-SEMAP), which has the ability to separate between the needle layer and separable layer due to the formation of air bubbles when interacting with interstitial fluid in the skin. RESULT: The characterization results of MP-CLY proved that CLY was encapsulated in large amounts as the amount of PCL polymer used increased, and there was no change in the chemical structure of CLY. In vitro release test results showed increased CLY release in media cultured with Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and showed controlled release. The characterization results of MPCLY-SEMAP showed that the developed formula has optimal mechanical and penetration capabilities and can separate in 56 ± 5.099 s. An ex vivo dermatokinetic test on a bacterially infected skin model showed an improvement of CLY dermatokinetic profile from MP-CLY SEMAP and a decrease in bacterial viability by 99.99%. CONCLUSION: This research offers proof of concept demonstrating the improved dermatokinetic profile of CLY encapsulated in a bacteria sensitive MP form and delivered via MP-CLY-SEMAP. The results of this research can be developed for future research by testing MP-CLY-SEMAP in vivo in appropriate animal models.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Clindamycin , Diabetic Foot , Skin , Staphylococcus aureus , Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Animals , Skin/microbiology , Skin/metabolism , Polyesters/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Liberation , Administration, Cutaneous , Transdermal Patch , Humans , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Drug Carriers/chemistry
16.
mSphere ; 9(3): e0077423, 2024 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426801

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are the most common complications of diabetes resulting from hyperglycemia leading to ischemic hypoxic tissue and nerve damage. Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequently isolated bacteria from DFUs and causes severe necrotic infections leading to amputations with a poor 5-year survival rate. However, very little is known about the mechanisms by which S. aureus dominantly colonizes and causes severe disease in DFUs. Herein, we utilized a pressure wound model in diabetic TALLYHO/JngJ mice to reproduce ischemic hypoxic tissue damage seen in DFUs and demonstrated that anaerobic fermentative growth of S. aureus significantly increased the virulence and the severity of disease by activating two-component regulatory systems leading to expression of virulence factors. Our in vitro studies showed that supplementation of nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor promotes anaerobic respiration and suppresses the expression of S. aureus virulence factors through inactivation of two-component regulatory systems, suggesting potential therapeutic benefits by promoting anaerobic nitrate respiration. Our in vivo studies revealed that dietary supplementation of L-arginine (L-Arg) significantly attenuated the severity of disease caused by S. aureus in the pressure wound model by providing nitrate. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of anaerobic fermentative growth in S. aureus pathogenesis and the potential of dietary L-Arg supplementation as a therapeutic to prevent severe S. aureus infection in DFUs.IMPORTANCES. aureus is the most common cause of infection in DFUs, often resulting in lower-extremity amputation with a distressingly poor 5-year survival rate. Treatment for S. aureus infections has largely remained unchanged for decades and involves tissue debridement with antibiotic therapy. With high levels of conservative treatment failure, recurrence of ulcers, and antibiotic resistance, a new approach is necessary to prevent lower-extremity amputations. Nutritional aspects of DFU treatment have largely been overlooked as there has been contradictory clinical trial evidence, but very few in vitro and in vivo modelings of nutritional treatment studies have been performed. Here we demonstrate that dietary supplementation of L-Arg in a diabetic mouse model significantly reduced duration and severity of disease caused by S. aureus. These findings suggest that L-Arg supplementation could be useful as a potential preventive measure against severe S. aureus infections in DFUs.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Staphylococcal Infections , Animals , Mice , Staphylococcus aureus , Virulence , Nitrates , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/complications , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Virulence Factors , Dietary Supplements
17.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e943092, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a high-morbidity and debilitating complication of diabetic foot ulcers that contributes to significantly worse quality of life in the affected population and higher cost of healthcare services. One of the clinical presentations of diabetic foot osteomyelitis is the 'sausage' toe deformity, which affects the phalanges (local soft tissue infection and underlying bony changes). This deformity is highly suggestive of the presence of osteomyelitis. Unfortunately, during recent years, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria have created great difficulties in choosing appropriate empirical antibiotics for the treatment of diabetic foot infections. Multidrug-resistant pathogens have been strongly related to higher morbidity and mortality compared with infections caused by their antibiotic-susceptible counterparts. CASE REPORT We describe a case of a 74-year-old woman with long-standing insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, who experienced extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infection that caused diabetic foot osteomyelitis with 'sausage' deformity in her second right toe. She was successfully treated with surgical debridement combined with the administration of ertapenem in the outpatient setting, completing, in total, a 6-week course of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS 'Sausage' toe deformity is one of the clinical presentations of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, and should be an alarming sign in everyday clinical practice. Ertapenem is an excellent option for the treatment of diabetic foot infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase E. coli in the outpatient setting. Early diagnosis and proper therapeutic approach are of great importance to reduce the risk of amputations, overall mortality, total cost, and the surge of antimicrobial resistance in the community.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Osteomyelitis , Female , Humans , Aged , Ertapenem/therapeutic use , Diabetic Foot/complications , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Escherichia coli , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Outpatients , Quality of Life , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Toes , beta-Lactamases
18.
J Diabetes Complications ; 38(4): 108718, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490126

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of denosumab on pedal bone health and clinical resolution in active Charcot foot (CN). METHODS: This multicentre open-label phase 2 randomised controlled trial recruited adults with diabetes mellitus and active CN within 3 months of onset. Participants were randomised to standard care alone, or with denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously. Denosumab was administered at baseline and again at 6 months, unless foot temperature had normalised (i.e. <2 °C compared to contralateral foot). Co-primary outcomes were change in calcaneal Stiffness Index and foot temperature normalisation over 18 months. RESULTS: Twelve participants per group were analysed; mean age 58 ± 11 years, 83 % male and 92 % had type 2 diabetes. Active CN duration was median 8 (IQR 7-12) weeks. Ninety-two percent were Eichenholtz stage 1 and 96 % involved the midfoot. After 1-month, median decline in Stiffness Index was less in the denosumab verses standard care group (0.5 [IQR -1.0 to 3.9] vs -2.8 [-8.5 to -1.0], p = 0.008). At 18-months, 92 % of the denosumab group attained foot temperature normalisation versus 67 % of the standard care group (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab ameliorated the early decline in calcaneal Stiffness Index associated with active CN. However, no difference in normalisation of foot temperature was observed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Denosumab/adverse effects , Bone Density , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/complications , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Inflammation
19.
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed ; 35(9): 1421-1438, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536671

ABSTRACT

The present research focuses on formulating and evaluating hydrogels modified with crosslinking agents using methylcellulose to treat diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Methylcellulose hydrogels are prepared and characterized for their crosslinking capacity through FTIR and degradation studies. The optimized hydrogel is further assessed for viscosity, gel strength, contact angle, in-vitro biodegradation, water-vapor transmission rate, anti-bacterial activity, and in-vivo efficacy. The results demonstrate that the developed hydrogel exhibits promising properties for DFU treatment, including increased wound healing percentage, improved ulcer morphology, reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines, and enhanced tissue characteristics. These findings suggest that the novel hydrogel composition could serve as a viable alternative to existing dressings for DFU management.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Hydrogels , Methylcellulose , Wound Healing , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Animals , Methylcellulose/chemistry , Hydrogels/chemistry , Wound Healing/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Viscosity , Male , Rats , Cytokines/metabolism
20.
Int Wound J ; 21(3): e14767, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38444012

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis aims to systematically investigate the clinical efficacy of Chinese herbal compound dressings in treating patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). A comprehensive computerised search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases, from database inception to November 2023, to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the use of Chinese herbal compound dressings in patients with DFU. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. Overall, 18 RCTs involving 1405 DFU patients were included. The analysis indicated that compared to the control group, the group treated with Chinese herbal compound dressings had significantly shorter ulcer healing time (standardised mean difference [SMD] = -2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.53 to -1.46, p < 0.001), reduced ulcer surface area (SMD = -3.38, 95% CI: -4.67 to -2.09, p < 0.001), and higher healing rates (odds ratio [OR] = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.72-2.92, p < 0.001) as well as overall effectiveness rates (OR = 4.56, 95% CI: 3.10-6.71, p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the external application of Chinese herbal compound dressings in patients with DFU can significantly shorten the ulcer healing time and improve wound healing rates.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Humans , Asian People , Bandages , China , Data Analysis , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...