Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.107
Filter
1.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 19(1): 37, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of co-occurring mental disorders (termed 'dual diagnosis') among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is scarce. This study aimed (1) to estimate the prevalence and structure of dual diagnoses in two national cohorts of OAT patients and (2) to compare mental disorders between OAT patients and the general populations stratified on sex and standardized by age. METHODS: A registry-linkage study of OAT patients from Czechia (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019 was conducted. Data on mental disorders (F00-F99; ICD-10) recorded in nationwide health registers were linked to the individuals registered in OAT. Dual diagnoses were defined as any mental disorder excluding substance use disorders (SUDs, F10-F19; ICD-10). Sex-specific age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated for 2019 to compare OAT patients and the general populations. RESULTS: The prevalence of dual diagnosis was 57.3% for Czechia and 78.3% for Norway. In Czechia, anxiety (31.1%) and personality disorders (25.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas anxiety (33.8%) and depression (20.8%) were the most prevalent in Norway. Large country-specific variations were observed, e.g., in ADHD (0.5% in Czechia, 15.8% in Norway), implying differences in screening and diagnostic practices. The SMR estimates for any mental disorders were 3.1 (females) and 5.1 (males) in Czechia and 5.6 (females) and 8.2 (males) in Norway. OAT females had a significantly higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders, whereas SMRs were higher in OAT males. In addition to opioid use disorder (OUD), other substance use disorders (SUDs) were frequently recorded in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate an excess of mental health problems in OAT patients compared to the general population of the same sex and age in both countries, requiring appropriate clinical attention. Country-specific differences may stem from variations in diagnostics and care, reporting to registers, OAT provision, or substance use patterns.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders , Registries , Humans , Norway/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Prevalence , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Young Adult , Adolescent , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Aged , Sex Factors
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791792

ABSTRACT

Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based treatment method in substance abuse treatment. However, little is known about its efficacy in dually diagnosed patients with psychosis and in inpatient settings. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of CM for dually diagnosed patients with psychosis in an inpatient setting. Furthermore, we investigate the effect of the nature of the reward used (cash vs. prize) on the efficacy of CM. We made use of an 8-week fish-bowl CM intervention by means of a within-subject reversal design with three treatment phases (baseline-intervention-follow-up). Sixty-seven patients were included in this study, of whom thirty-four completed the protocol. The results show no effect of CM on abstinence nor an interaction with clinical or demographic variables. Cash money is as effective as prizes. Future research should further investigate the effect of psychosis and treatment setting on the efficacy of CM, with special attention for Patient Report Experience and Outcome Measures (PREM/PROM).


Subject(s)
Inpatients , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Male , Adult , Female , Inpatients/psychology , Middle Aged , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Reward , Young Adult
3.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 53(1): 93-102, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677941

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The co-occurrence of substance use disorder with at least one other mental disorder is called dual pathology, which in turn is characterised by heterogeneous symptoms that are difficult to diagnose and have a poor response to treatment. For this reason, the identification and validation of biomarkers is necessary. Within this group, possible electroencephalographic biomarkers have been reported to be useful in diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, both in neuropsychiatric conditions and in substance use disorders. This article aims to review the existing literature on electroencephalographic biomarkers in dual pathology. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature. A bibliographic search was performed on the PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, BIREME and Scielo databases, with the keywords: electrophysiological biomarker and substance use disorder, electrophysiological biomarker and mental disorders, biomarker and dual pathology, biomarker and substance use disorder, electroencephalography, and substance use disorder or comorbid mental disorder. RESULTS: Given the greater amount of literature found in relation to electroencephalography as a biomarker of mental illness and substance use disorders, and the few articles found on dual pathology, the evidence is organised as a biomarker in psychiatry for the diagnosis and prediction of risk and as a biomarker for dual pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence is not conclusive, it suggests the existence of a subset of sites and mechanisms where the effects of psychoactive substances and the neurobiology of some mental disorders could overlap or interact.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Electroencephalography , Mental Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Electroencephalography/methods , Biomarkers/metabolism , Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
5.
J Dual Diagn ; 20(2): 178-187, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502951

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Drug addiction is a chronic mental disorder that significantly impacts all aspects of an individual's life, and substance use disorder in patients with bipolar disorder. The objective of this study is to assess the frequency of substance abuse among patients with bipolar spectrum disorder. METHOD: This cross-sectional study evaluated the frequency of bipolar spectrum disorder in patients taking methadone through various screening measures, including Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), DSM IV criteria, Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ), Goodwin and Ghaemi's criteria, and Akiskal classification for bipolar disorders. RESULTS: Out of the total 197 participants in the study, 77 were identified as individuals engaging in poly-substance abuse. The investigation assessed the frequency of bipolar spectrum disorder based on various diagnostic criteria: 24% according to DSM-IV criteria, 29.9% using MDQ, 29.9% based on Ghaemi and Goodwin's criteria, and the highest rate at 48.2% when applying Akiskal's classification. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high frequency of bipolar disorder among individuals with substance use disorder, especially those with concomitant depression. Therefore, it is crucial to pay special attention to individuals with substance use disorder with co-existing bipolar disorder.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Cross-Sectional Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Prenat Diagn ; 44(3): 352-356, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342957

ABSTRACT

A consanguineous couple was referred at 10 weeks of gestation (WG) for prenatal genetic investigations due to isolated cystic hygroma. Prenatal trio exome sequencing identified causative homozygous truncating variants in ASCC1 previously implicated in spinal muscular atrophy with congenital bone fractures. Prenatal manifestations in ASCC1 can usually include hydramnios, fetal hypo-/akinesia, arthrogryposis, contractures and limb deformities, hydrops fetalis and cystic hygroma. An additional truncating variant was identified in CSPP1 associated with Joubert syndrome. Presentations in CSPP1 include cerebellar and brainstem malformations with vermis hypoplasia and molar tooth sign, difficult to visualize in early gestation. A second pregnancy was marked by the recurrence of isolated increased nuchal translucency at 10 + 2 WG. Sanger prenatal diagnosis targeted on ASCC1 and CSPP1 variants showed the presence of the homozygous familial ASCC1 variant. In this case, prenatal exome sequencing analysis is subject to a partial ASCC1 phenotype and an undetectable CSPP1 phenotype at 10 weeks of gestation. As CSPP1 contribution is unclear or speculative to a potentially later in pregnancy or postnatal phenotype, it is mentioned as a variant of uncertain significance. The detection of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants involved in severe disorders but without phenotype-genotype correlation because the pregnancy is in the early stages or due to prenatally undetectable phenotypes, will encourage the clinical community to define future practices in molecular prenatal reporting.


Subject(s)
Lymphangioma, Cystic , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Lymphangioma, Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Lymphangioma, Cystic/genetics , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Prenatal Diagnosis , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Phenotype , Carrier Proteins/genetics
7.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(4): 281-289, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380582

ABSTRACT

AIM: Based on a large cohort of dual diagnosis patients, the aim of this study was to quantify the patient-perceived problems and advantages of their substance use and relate the quantity of problems to the substance type and psychiatric diagnosis. MATERIAL: Data comes from a naturalistic cohort admitted to an in-patient facility in Denmark specialized in integrated dual diagnosis treatment. We included 1076 patients at their first admission to the facility from 2010 to 2017. Participants completed 607 DrugCheck and 130 DUDIT-E questionnaires. METHOD: we analyzed the questionnaires and included admission diagnosis by use of t-test and ANOVA to depict the patterns in substance use in relation to psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS: The three most common substance related problems according to the DrugCheck questionnaire were: feeling depressed, financial problems, and losing interest in daily activities. From DUDIT-E, the highest-ranking negative substance related effects were financial ruin, deterioration of health, and problems at work. Effects on social life relationships were also evident with more than 40% of participants. The top three positive substance related effects reported were relaxation, improved sleep, and control over negative emotions. The number of problems listed varied significantly with the type of preferred substance. Patients using pain medication, sedatives, central stimulants, and alcohol reported most problems. Diagnosis did not differentiate the problems experienced. Results partially support the broad self-medication hypothesis for patients with severe mental illness, but also points out that patients are well aware of negative effects.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Self Medication , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Denmark , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Self Medication/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Comorbidity
9.
Epilepsy Behav ; 152: 109661, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with a dual-diagnosis of epilepsy and dissociative seizures (DS) have received far less attention than those with single pathology. Anti-seizure medication (ASM) prescription patterns and safety of rationalisation have not been reviewed. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of all patients with a dual-diagnosis admitted to the Scottish Epilepsy Centre between 2012-2020. ASM frequencies were compared across admission, discharge and follow-up and emergency hospital attendances compared a year before and after admission. Demographic data, seizure characteristics and mortality data were also reviewed. RESULTS: Across the 139 patients included in our study, ASM frequency at follow-up was significantly lower than on admission (mean 2.51 vs 2.14, Z = -2.11 p = 0.035, r = -0.215). Total hospital attendances in the year following admission were significantly lower than in the year before (mean 1.27 vs 0.77, Z = 2.306, p = 0.021, r = -0.262). Those with inactive epilepsy had their medications reduced to a greater extent that those with active epilepsy. 44 patients had their ASM frequency reduced during admission with a similar trend of reduced hospital attendances (mean 1.29 vs 0.43 Z = -3.162 p = 0.002). There was one epilepsy related death. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider the development of co-morbid DS in patients with epilepsy not responding to an escalation of ASM, especially if presenting with a new seizure type. Patients with a dual-diagnosis of epilepsy and DS, particularly those with well controlled epilepsy, are likely overtreated with ASM. Medication review in a tertiary epilepsy centre allows for safe rationalisation of ASM and likely contributes to the need for fewer hospital attendances.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Feasibility Studies , Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures , Retrospective Studies , Epilepsy/complications , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use
10.
Qual Life Res ; 33(1): 229-239, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856045

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine clinical outcomes and employment status in Veterans with and without a dual diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined a national sample of Veterans enrolled in the VA Million Veteran Program who completed the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE) as part of the Veterans Health Administration's TBI Screening and Evaluation Program. Veterans (N = 12,985) were classified into the following TBI/SCI groups using CTBIE data: those with a dual diagnosis of TBI and SCI (TBI+/SCI+); those with a history of TBI but no SCI (TBI+/SCI-); and those with no history of TBI or SCI (TBI-/SCI-; i.e., the control group). CTBIE-derived outcomes included neurobehavioral symptoms, comorbid psychiatric symptoms, pain and pain interference, and employment status. RESULTS: Chi-square analyses showed significant associations between TBI/SCI group and all clinical outcomes evaluated (all p's < .001; V = 0.07-0.11). In general, the TBI+/SCI+ and TBI +/SCI- groups endorsed comparable levels of neurobehavioral symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, and pain, but significantly greater rates of symptoms and pain relative to the TBI-/SCI- group. Effect sizes for all pairwise comparisons were small (φ = 0.01-0.11). Finally, there was no significant association between TBI/SCI group and employment status (p = .170; V = 0.02), with all three groups showing relatively comparable rates of unemployment. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of SCI status, Veterans with TBI history endorsed poorer clinical outcomes than Veterans without TBI and SCI. However, rates of unemployment were similarly high across all three groups. Findings suggest that any Veteran completing the CTBIE may be at risk for poor clinical and employment outcomes.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Spinal Cord Injuries , Substance-Related Disorders , Veterans , Humans , Veterans/psychology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Employment , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Pain , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology
11.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 56(1): 97-108, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36827487

ABSTRACT

This study analyzed, in a Spanish sample, the differences in emotional processing in patients diagnosed with substance use disorder (SUD) and patients with a dual diagnosis (DD), and tested whether alterations in emotional regulation were related to the severity of dependence and consumption during treatment. A descriptive follow-up study was conducted with 88 adult outpatients (83% men) who were receiving treatment for alcohol and cocaine SUD. Of the sample, 43.2% presented dual diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR criteria. Emotional processing was assessed with the IAPS, and dependence severity with the SDSS. Consumption was determined with self-reports and toxicological tests. Regression analyses revealed that the DD group had more difficulties in identifying the valence and arousal of the images than patients with SUD. Patients with DD presented more difficulty in identifying images in which valence was manipulated, but not in those in which arousal was manipulated. Cocaine use during treatment was associated with difficulties in identifying unpleasant (U = 734.0; p < .05) and arousing (U = 723.5; p < .05) images. Although these results are preliminary, findings suggest that impaired emotional processing is aggravated in dual patients, although it may be a common transdiagnostic factor in SUD and other comorbid mental disorders. Findings highlight the importance of evaluating emotional regulation to better understand its possible role in the maintenance of substance use.


Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders , Cocaine , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Emotions/physiology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
12.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(2): 112-119, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938028

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Antipsychotic polypharmacy is prevalent, however literature on antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment among patients with dual diagnosis is largely non-existent. This study aims to investigating the extent of antipsychotic polypharmacy dual diagnosis patients during hospitalisations. METHODS: Utilizing cohort data from an integrated dual diagnosis in-patient facility from patients hospitalized between 1 March 2012, to 31 December 2016, we compared the mean antipsychotic medication administered at admission and discharge and examined covariate associations with logistic regressions. RESULTS: The study identified 907 hospital admissions, of which 641 were the first for each patient during the period. At admission, 74.1% received antipsychotics; polypharmacy spanned psychiatric disorders. categories. Patients with affective or personality spectrum disorders were less likely to have antipsychotic polypharmacy upon admission compared to those with psychosis spectrum disorders. 2013-2016 admissions presented less polypharmacy than 2012. Mean antipsychotic numbers remained unchanged for >30-day hospitalizations. Patients admitted without antipsychotic polypharmacy with an affective spectrum disorder or aged 41-50 or over 51 years old were less likely to be discharged with antipsychotic polypharmacy when compared to patients with psychosis spectrum disorder or aged 18-30 years old. CONCLUSION: Approximately three-quarters of admitted patients were treated with antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotic polypharmacy was observed across all psychiatric disorder categories, indicating potential off-label use. Addressing antipsychotic polypharmacy during treatment is challenging, even for specialised facilities. Rational antipsychotic prescribing, deprescribing protocols, and further prescription pattern research are needed.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Polypharmacy , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Hospitalization , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Denmark/epidemiology
14.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 21(12): 1218-1223, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38081125

ABSTRACT

A 66-year-old male presented with hypereosinophilia, thrombocytosis, extensive thrombosis refractory to direct oral anticoagulant therapy, and evidence of end-organ damage, including rash, splenic infarcts, and pulmonary infiltrates. Bone marrow biopsy revealed myeloid malignancy consistent with both chronic eosinophilic leukemia and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis. Next-generation sequencing of the patient's eosinophils and neutrophil compartments revealed pathologic variants in EZH2 and SF3B1 in addition to a noncanonical JAK2 R683S mutation that has not been previously described in myeloproliferative disorders or other chronic myeloid neoplasms. These mutations were not present in the patient's lymphoid cell fraction, suggesting that the hematopoietic malignancy arose in a myeloid-committed progenitor cell. Based on this case and previous work from our group, we propose that noncanonical JAK2 mutations may permit signal transduction that biases toward eosinophilic differentiation in chronic myeloid neoplasms. Although the patient's blood counts initially responded to ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea, the response was not durable. Early referral for allogenic bone marrow transplant appears necessary to prevent long-term complications and disease progression in myeloid neoplasms with clonal hypereosinophilia driven by noncanonical JAK2 mutations.


Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Leukemia , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Myeloproliferative Disorders , Thrombocytosis , Male , Humans , Aged , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Myeloproliferative Disorders/diagnosis , Myeloproliferative Disorders/genetics , Myeloproliferative Disorders/therapy , Thrombocytosis/diagnosis , Thrombocytosis/genetics , Thrombocytosis/pathology , Mutation , Janus Kinase 2/genetics
16.
Tog (A Coruña) ; 20(2): 170-177, Nov 30, 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-228911

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: medir el impacto de la participación en actividades espirituales en el proceso de recuperación de patología dual. Métodos: estudio observacional descriptivo con metodología mixta realizado con una muestra de 20 usuarios hombre, tratados en régimen interno en la Comunidad Terapéutica (CT): Ayuda a la Recuperación de Politoxicómanos de Málaga (ARPOM), en Málaga, España. La espiritualidad se ha medido según el Cuestionario de Espiritualidad de Parsian y Dunning validado al español; y el proceso de recuperación, a través de grupo focal. Resultados: la puntuación media de la espiritualidad ha sido de 2,9 en un rango de 0-4, donde 4 se corresponde a “totalmente de acuerdo” en base a afirmaciones realizadas sobre la espiritualidad. Los grupos focales mostraron que los usuarios en su mayoría asocian la espiritualidad a la religión, y no a la ética y moral; y que su deseo en el proceso de recuperación es implementar la realización de actividades espirituales en su tratamiento. Conclusiones: la realización de actividades espirituales influencia positivamente el proceso de recuperación de los usuarios con patología dual.(AU)


Objective: To assess the influence of participation in spiritual activities on the recovery process of individuals with dual pathology. Methods: A descriptive observational study with a sample of 20 users treated internally in the Therapeutic Community: Ayuda a la Recuperación de Politoxicómanos de Málaga, in Málaga, Spain. Spirituality was assessed using the Parsian and Dunning Spirituality Questionnaire, which has been validated in Spanish, and the recovery process was examined through focus groups. Results: The mean spirituality score was 2.9 on a scale of 0-4, where 4 corresponds to "totally agree," based on statements about spirituality. The focus groups showed that users mostly associate spirituality with religion, not with ethics and morality, and that users in the recovery process desire to implement spiritual activities in their treatment. Conclusions: Performing spiritual activities positively impacts the recovery process of users with dual pathology.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Spiritualism , Spiritual Therapies , Mental Health Recovery , Occupational Therapy , Mental Health , Spain , Religion and Psychology , Ethics , Morale
17.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 44(7): e470-e475, 2023 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) and fetal alcohol syndrome disorders are both common causes of intellectual disability in children. When both conditions are present in the same individual, the resultant phenotype may make identification of clinical issues and management challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we present a case of triplets who had significant in utero alcohol exposure; 2 of whom also have FXS and the other not having the fragile X mutation. The siblings with FXS have subtle differences in the physical phenotype compared with the other one, who has prominent features of partial fetal alcohol syndrome instead. However, all 3 siblings have intellectual impairment (although this is more severe in the 2 with FXS), meet diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder, and present with severe behavioral challenges. The clinical presentation of the 2 siblings with FXS is much more severe as compared to a child with FXS alone, and this is likely due to the additive effect of in utero alcohol exposure and environmental factors. We discuss the combination of these 2 pathologies and how this can affect the overall clinical presentation. CONCLUSION: In the management of children with FXS, evaluation for other risk factors that can have neurobehavioral sequelae is important, and these can affect clinical presentation and prognosis.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders , Fragile X Syndrome , Intellectual Disability , Substance-Related Disorders , Child , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Fragile X Syndrome/complications , Fragile X Syndrome/diagnosis , Autism Spectrum Disorder/etiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications , Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Intellectual Disability/genetics
20.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 51(2): 172-177, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37254766

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the genetic, molecular and neuroanatomical similarities between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia using the case report of a 34-year-old female patient with a previous diagnosis of schizophrenia as an example. As a result of repeat hospitalization, expanded history, psychological testing and verification of persistent symptoms of psychopathology, a cooccurring diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder was made.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Schizophrenia , Female , Humans , Adult , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/genetics , Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications , Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis , Autism Spectrum Disorder/genetics , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...