Clinical diagnostic reference levels in neuroradiology based on clinical indication.

This study focuses on patient radiation exposure in interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures, a field that has advanced significantly since its inception in the 1980s. INR employs minimally invasive techniques to treat complex cerebrovascular diseases in the head, neck, and spine. The study establishes diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for three clinical indications (CIs): stroke (S), brain aneurysms (ANs), and brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Data from 209 adult patients were analyzed, and DRLs were determined in terms of various dosimetric and technical quantities. For stroke, the established DRLs median values were found to be 78 Gy cm2, 378 mGy, 118 mGy, 12 min, 442 images, and 15 runs. Similarly, DRLs for brain AN are 85 Gy cm2, 611 mGy, 95.5 mGy, 19.5, 717 images, and 26 runs. For brain AVM, the DRL's are 180 Gy cm2, 1144 mGy, 537 mGy, 36 min, 1375 images, and 31 runs. Notably, this study is unique in reporting DRLs for specific CIs within INR procedures, providing valuable insights for optimizing patient safety and radiation exposure management.

Characterisation of Portuguese radiotherapy departments: Organisation, occupational exposure values and diagnostic reference levels for breast and prostate computed tomography planning.

INTRODUCTION: Portugal currently hosts 24 active radiotherapy departments, 8 public and 16 privates, presenting potential radiation exposure risks to multidisciplinary teams. Patients in these treatments also face ionising radiation during treatment planning and verification. METHODS: Authorisation and ethical approval were secured for a national online survey, disseminated to radiotherapy departments across Portugal. The survey encompassed three sections: equipment, staff, and radiographer role characterisation; occupational exposure values for one month; and exposure parameters, including computed tomography (CT) dose values [CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP)] for breast and prostate cancer CT planning. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) derived were based on the 75th percentile of median dose values. RESULTS: The study garnered a 50% response rate from public institutions, 12,5% from private and 25% from all active radiotherapy institutions in Portugal. All departments employ Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) and incorporate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and/or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) irradiation techniques. Additionally, half of the departments also perform Brachytherapy (BT). Radiographers demonstrated an occupational dose of zero mSv. CT planning dose values were 13 mGy and 512 mGy cm for breast CT and 16 mGy and 689 mGy cm for prostate CT, pertaining to CTDIvol and DLP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most aspects of national radiotherapy characterisation align with the established literature. Occupational exposure values exhibited consistency across radiotherapy modalities. An approach to national DRLs was formulated for breast and prostate CT planning, yielding values congruent with recent European studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study offers vital insights for analysing occupational contexts and risk prevention, serving as the initial characterisation of the national radiotherapy landscape. It also pioneers the calculation of DRLs for CT planning in radiotherapy to optimise procedures.

Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Administered Activity in Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine in Thailand.

The diagnostic reference level (DRL) is a patient-exposure optimization tool used to evaluate radiation doses in medical imaging and provide guidance for protection from them. In Thailand, nuclear medicine DRLs have not been established yet. Therefore, this study surveyed dose levels in routine nuclear medicine procedures to provide national DRLs (NDRLs). Methods: NDRLs in Thailand were established by investigating the administered activity of radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine examination studies. The NDRLs were determined on the basis of the 75th percentile (third quartile) of administered activity distribution as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. As part of a nationwide survey, datasets for the period between June 1, 2018, and August 31, 2019, were collected from 21 Thailand hospitals with nuclear medicine equipment. All hospitals were asked to report the nuclear medicine imaging devices in use, the standard protocol parameters for selected examinations, the injected activities, and the ages and weights of patients. All data were calculated to determine Thailand NDRLs, which were compared with international NDRLs. Results: The data reported by the 21 hospitals consisted of 4,641 examinations with SPECT or SPECT/CT for general nuclear medicine and 409 examinations with PET. The most widely performed examinations for SPECT were bone, thyroid, oncology, and cardiovascular imaging. The NDRLs for SPECT or SPECT/CT agreed well with published NDRLs for Europe, the United States, Japan, Korea, Kuwait, and Australia. In contrast, the NDRLs for 18F-FDG PET in oncology studies were higher than for Japan, Korea, Kuwait, and Australia but lower than for the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. Conclusion: This study presents NDRL results for adults in Thailand as a way to optimize radiation protection in nuclear medicine imaging. Moreover, the reported injected activity levels were comparable to those of other countries.

An audit of patient radiation doses during interventional cardiology procedures in Uttarakhand, India, and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.

The objective of this study was to investigate patient radiation doses by a dose audit of three common interventional cardiology (IC) procedures: coronary angiography (CA), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and CA-PTCA procedures performed in IC centres in the Uttarakhand state of India, for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and the estimation of average effective dose (Eav) for these procedures. For each procedure, the values of kerma-area product (PKA), reference air kerma (Ka,r), fluoroscopy time (FT) and the number of cine images were recorded from 1233 CA, 458 PTCA and 736 CA-PTCA procedures performed over a 12-month period at 13 IC centres of the state. From the recorded dose data, 0.6%, 1.53% and 7.9% patients were identified to have exceeded the PKA trigger level of 500 Gy cm2 for possible skin injury for CA, PTCA and CA-PTCA procedures, respectively. The 3rd quartile of the distribution of the recorded PKA values for each type of procedure was calculated to estimate local DRL values. The estimated values of DRLs and Eav were 37, 153 and 224 Gy cm2, and 6.72, 23.97 and 34.79 mSv for CA, PTCA and CA-PTCA procedures, respectively. For about 77% of the surveyed centres, the recorded patient doses were in agreement with the international standards. The local DRLs proposed in this study may be used to achieve patient dose optimization during IC procedures and the obtained patient dose data may also be archived into national dose database for the establishment of national DRLs.

Optimization of CT pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism using task-based image quality assessment and diagnostic reference levels: A multicentric study.

PURPOSE: To establish size-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) based on patient CT examinations performed on 74 CT devices. To assess task-based image quality (IQ) for each device and to investigate the variability of dose and IQ across different CTs. To propose a dose/IQ optimization. METHODS: 1051 CT pulmonary angiography dose data were collected. DRLs were calculated as the 75th percentile of CT dose index (CTDI) for two patient categories based on the thoracic perimeters. IQ was assessed with two thoracic phantom sizes using local acquisition parameters and three other dose levels. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of a 2 mm low perfused vessel was assessed with a non-prewhitening with eye-filter model observer. The optimal IQ-dose point was mathematically assessed from the relationship between IQ and dose. RESULTS: The DRLs of CTDIvol were 6.4 mGy and 10 mGy for the two patient categories. 75th percentiles of phantom CTDIvol were 6.3 mGy and 10 mGy for the two phantom sizes with inter-quartile AUC values of 0.047 and 0.066, respectively. After the optimization, 75th percentiles of phantom CTDIvol decreased to 5.9 mGy and 7.55 mGy and the interquartile AUC values were reduced to 0.025 and 0.057 for the two phantom sizes. CONCLUSION: DRLs for PE were proposed as a function of patient thoracic perimeters. This study highlights the variability in terms of dose and IQ. An optimization process can be started individually and lead to a harmonization of practice throughout multiple CT sites.

Impact of equipment technology on reference levels in fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of equipment technology on reference point air kerma (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), and fluoroscopic time for fluoroscopically-guided gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures and establish benchmark levels. METHODS: This retrospective study included the consecutive patients who underwent fluoroscopically-guided gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures from May 2016 to August 2023 at a tertiary care hospital in the U.S. Fluoroscopic systems included (a) Omega CS-50 e-View, (b) GE Precision 500D, and (c) Siemens Cios Alpha. Radiation dose was analyzed for four procedure types of endoscopic retrograde biliary, pancreas, biliary and pancreas combined, and other guidance. Median and 75th percentile values were computed using software package R (version 4.0.5, R Foundation). RESULTS: This large study analyzed 9,459 gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Among four procedure types, median Ka,r was 108.8-433.2 mGy (a), 70-272 mGy (b), and 22-55.1 mGy (c). Median PKA was 20.9-49.5 Gy∙cm2 (a), 13.4-39.7 Gy∙cm2 (b), and 8.91-20.9 Gy∙cm2 (c). Median fluoroscopic time was 2.8-8.1 min (a), 3.6-9.2 min (b), and 2.9-9.4 min (c). Their median value ratio (a:b:c) was 8.5:4.8:1 (Ka,r), 2.7:2.1:1 (PKA), and 1.0:1.1:1 (fluoroscopic time). Median value and 75th percentile are presented for Ka,r, PKA, and fluoroscopic time for each procedure type, which can function as benchmark for comparison for dose optimization studies. CONCLUSION: This study shows manifold variation in doses (Ka,r and PKA) among three fluoroscopic equipment types and provides local reference levels (50th and 75th percentiles) for four gastrointestinal endoscopic procedure types. Besides procedure type, imaging technology should be considered for establishing diagnostic reference level. SUMMARY: With manifold (2 to 12 times) variation in doses observed in this study among 3 machines, we recommend development of technology-based diagnostic reference levels for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Establishment and utilisation of national diagnostic reference level for adult computed tomography examinations in Ghana.

The International Atomic Energy Agency, as part of the new regional project (RAF/9/059), recommend the establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Africa. In response to this recommendation, this project was designed to establish and utilise national DRLs of routine computed tomography (CT) examinations. These were done by estimating CT dose index and dose length product (DLP) from a minimum of 20 patient dose report of the most frequently used procedures using 75th percentile distribution of the median values. In all, 22 centres that formed 54% of all CT equipment in the country took part in this study. Additionally, a total of 2156 adult patients dose report were randomly selected, with a percentage distribution of 60, 12, 21 and 7% for head, chest, abdomen-pelvis and lumber spine, respectively. The established DRL for volume CT dose index were 60.0, 15.7, 20.5 and 23.8 mGy for head, chest, abdomen-pelvis and lumber spine, respectively. While the established DRL for DLP were 962.9, 1102.8, 1393.5 and 824.6 mGy-cm for head, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and lumber spine, respectively. These preliminary results were comparable with data from 16 other African countries, European Commission and the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Hence, this study would serve as a baseline for the establishment of a more generalised regional and national adult DRLs for Africa and other developing countries.

Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for abdomen, KUB, and lumbar spine x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) provide guidance to optimise radiation doses for patients undergoing medical imaging procedures. This multi-centre study aimed to compare institutional DRLs (IDRLs) across hospitals, propose ADs and multi-centric DRLs (MCDRLs) for four common x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka, and assess the potential for dose reduction. A prospective cross-sectional study of 894 adult patients referred for abdomen anteroposterior (AP), kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) AP, lumbar spine AP, and lumbar spine lateral (LAT) x-ray examinations was conducted. Patient demographic information (age, sex, weight, BMI) and exposure parameters (tube voltage, tube current-exposure time product) were collected. Patient dose indicators were measured in terms of kerma-area product (PKA) using a PKAmeter. IDRLs, ADs, and MCDRLs were calculated following the International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines, with ADs and MCDRLs defined as the 50th and 75th percentiles of the median PKAdistributions, respectively. IDRL ranges varied considerably across hospitals: 1.42-2.42 Gy cm2for abdomen AP, 1.51-2.86 Gy cm2for KUB AP, 0.83-1.65 Gy cm2for lumbar spine AP, and 1.76-4.10 Gy cm2for lumbar spine LAT. The proposed ADs were 1.82 Gy cm2(abdomen AP), 2.03 Gy cm2(KUB AP), 1.27 Gy cm2(lumbar spine AP), and 2.21 Gy cm2(lumbar spine LAT). MCDRLs were 2.24 Gy cm2(abdomen AP), 2.40 Gy cm2(KUB AP), 1.43 Gy cm2(lumbar spine AP), and 2.38 Gy cm2(lumbar spine LAT). Substantial intra- and inter-hospital variations in PKAwere observed for all four examinations. Although ADs and MCDRLs in Sri Lanka were comparable to those in the existing literature, the identified intra- and inter-hospital variations underscore the need for dose reduction without compromising diagnostic information. Hospitals with high IDRLs are recommended to review and optimise their practices. These MCDRLs serve as preliminary national DRLs, guiding dose optimisation efforts by medical professionals and policymakers.

Updating national diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography in Greece: Challenges on patient protection optimisation.

The escalating use of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging necessitates establishment and periodic revision of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) to ensure patient protection optimization. This paper presents the outcomes of a national survey conducted from 2019 to 2022, focusing on revising DRLs for adult CT examinations. Dosimetric data from 127 scanners in 120 medical facilities, representing 25% of the country's CT scanners, were collected, emphasizing geographic distribution and technology representation. Τhe parameters used for DRLs were the CTDIvol and the DLP of a typical acquisition of the region of interest (scan DLP). In addition to the 7 CT examination for which the DRL values were revised, establishment of DRLs for neck, cervical spine, pelvic bones-hips, coronary artery calcium (Ca) score and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examinations was performed. Revised DRLs exhibited a 15 % average decrease in CTDIvol and a 7 % average decrease in scan DLP from the initial DRLs. This reduction of dosimetric values is relatively low compared to other national studies. The findings revealed wide variations in dosimetric values and scan lengths among scanners, emphasizing the need for standardization and optimization. Incorporation of advanced technologies like Iterative Reconstruction (IR) showcased potential for further dose reduction, yet challenges in uniform implementation persist. The study underscores the importance of ongoing optimisation efforts, particularly in the context of increased CT utilization and evolving technology. The revised DRLs have been officially adopted in Greece, emphasizing the commitment to safe and effective CT practices.

Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.

The aim of this study is to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) values for mammography in Switzerland. For the data collection, a survey was conducted among a sufficient number of centres, including five University hospitals, several cantonal hospitals, and large private clinics, covering all linguistic regions of Switzerland to be representative of the clinical practice. The data gathered contained the mean glandular dose (MGD), the compressed breast thickness (CBT), the mammography model and the examination parameters for each acquisition. The data collected was sorted into the following categories: 2D or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examination, craniocaudal (CC) or mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection, and eight categories of CBT ranging from 20 mm to 100 mm in 10 mm intervals. A total of 24 762 acquisitions were gathered in 31 centres on 36 mammography units from six manufacturers. The analysis showed that the data reflects the practice in Switzerland. The results revealed that the MGD is larger for DBT than for 2D acquisitions for the same CBT. From 20-30 mm to 90-100 mm of CBT, the 75th percentile of the MGD values obtained increased from 0.81 mGy to 2.55 mGy for 2D CC acquisitions, from 0.83 mGy to 2.96 mGy for 2D MLO acquisitions, from 1.22 mGy to 3.66 mGy for DBT CC acquisitions and from 1.33 mGy to 4.04 mGy for DBT MLO acquisitions. The results of the survey allow us to propose Swiss DRLs for mammography according to the examination type (2D/DBT), projection (CC/MLO) and CBT. The proposed values are very satisfactory in comparison with other studies.

National and local diagnostic reference levels for adult18F-FDG and CT in Jordanian PET/CT: findings and implications in practice.

This study aims to report the findings of Jordanian national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) survey for fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and local diagnostic reference level (LDRL) of computed tomography (CT) used for attenuation correction and anatomical localisation (AC-AL); and AC and diagnostic CT (AC-DX) within the context of whole-body WB and half-body HB adult oncology PET/CT scanning. Two-structured questionnaires were prepared to gather the necessary information: dosimetry data, patient demographics, equipment specification, and acquisition protocols for identified18F-FDG PET/CT procedures. The NDRL and achievable dose were reported based on the 75th and 50th percentiles for18F-FDG administered activity (AA), respectively. The LDRL was reported based on the 50th percentile for (CTDIvol) and (DLP). Data from 562 patients from four Jordanian PET/CT centres were collected. The survey revealed that Jordanian NDRL for AA (303 MBq) was within the acceptable range compared to the published-peer NDRL data (240-590 MBq). However, the18F-FDG AA varied across the participated PET/CT centres. The reported LDRL CTDIvoland DLP of CT used for (AC-AL) was 4.3 mGy and 459.3 mGy.cm for HB CT scan range, and 4.1 mGy and 659.9 mGy.cm for WB CT scans. The reported LDRL for CTDIvoland DLP for HB CT was higher when compared with the United Kingdom (3.2 mGy and 310 mGy.cm). Concurrently, in the context of WB CT, the reported values (i.e. CTDIvol and DLP) were also higher than both Kuwait (3.6 mGy and 659 mGy.cm) and Slovenia (3.6 mGy and 676 mGy.cm). The reported HB CT(AC-DX) was higher than Nordic, New Zealand and Swiss NDRLs and for WB (AC-DX) CT it was higher than Swiss NDRLs. This study reported the first Jordanian NDRL for18F-FDG and LDRL for HB and WB CT associated with18F-FDG PET/CT scans. This data is useful for Jordanian PET/CT centres to compare their LDRL to the suggested DRLs and utilise it in the process of optimising CT radiation doses.

Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels in Portuguese Interventional Radiology departments.

PURPOSE: To establish Portuguese Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), for six body fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures (FGIP). METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted in five interventional departments most representative of Interventional Radiology (IR) practice. Dose values, in terms of air kerma area product (PKA in Gy.cm2), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r in mGy), and exposure parameters (fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of cine runs) were collected. Examinations were selected per procedure (at least 20), according to the antero-posterior and lateral diameter mean value (±5 cm), measured on previous Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. RESULTS: Data of 489 body FGIP show a large variation on dose values per procedure and per department. National DRLs in terms of PKA were 20.2 Gy.cm2 for Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), 98.2 Gy.cm2 for Bronchial artery embolisation (BAE), 247.7 Gy.cm2 for Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), 331.6 Gy.cm2 for Inferior epigastric arteries embolisation (IEAE), 312.0 Gy.cm2 for Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and 19.3 Gy.cm2 for Endovascular treatment of femoral popliteal arteries (ETFPA). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting Interventional Radiology DRLs in Portugal and we propose preliminary national estimates for the six more common body FGIP. The results of this study will be presented and discussed with all Portuguese IR departments, to promote procedures optimisation.

Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).

The aim of this study was to report the diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) corresponding to different compressed breast thickness (CBT) ranges. To achieve this, mammographic examinations with 187,788 exposures were analysed. The mean average glandular (AGD) dose was calculated per view, examination, and center. Moreover, the DRL values corresponding to different CBT ranges were reported. The result of the mean AGD per view was found to be 1.36 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) and 1.54 mGy for Mediolateral oblique (MLO), while the mean AGD per examination for all women was 1.45 mGy. The DRL values corresponding to CBTs between 20 to 79 mm ranges were below 2 mGy. These results were from a population of mean age = 49 ± 8 years and mean CBT = 58 ± 8 mm, and was imaged with mean exposures of 29 ± 1 kVp and 74 ± 31 mAs, and a mean compression force of 135±37 N. In conclusion, good mammography practice has been shown, as DRL values are within the limits suggested by the international organizations.

Diagnostic Reference Levels of Radiographic and CT Examinations in Jordan: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: A comprehensive search was performed to examine the literature on diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for computed tomography (CT) and radiography examinations that are performed routinely in Jordan. EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for the search. The acronym "DRL" and the additional phrase "dose reference levels" were used to search for articles in literature. Seven papers that reported DRL values for radiography and CT scans in Jordan were identified. One study reported DRLs for conventional radiography, two studies reported CT DRLs in pediatrics, and the remaining four studies provided DRL values for adult CT scans. The most popular techniques for determining the DRLs were the entrance surface dose, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP) values. Variations in Jordanian DRL values were noted across both modalities. Lower radiation doses and less variation in DRL values may be achieved by educating and training radiographers to better understand dose reduction strategies. To limit dose variance and enable dosage comparison, CT DRLs must be standardized in accordance with the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

Clinical image quality assessment and mean glandular dose for full field digital mammography.

This study aims to assess the image quality (IQ) of 12 mammographic units and to identify units with potential optimisation needs. Data for 350 mammography examinations meeting inclusion criteria were collected retrospectively from April 2021 to April 2022. They were categorised based on the medical reports into 10 normal cases, 10 cases displaying calcifications and 10 cases presenting lesions. Two radiologists assessed the IQ of 1400 mammograms, evaluating system performance per Boitaet al's study and positioning performance following European guidelines. To measure agreement between the two radiologists, the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (κ) was computed, quantifying the excess of agreement beyond chance. The visual grading analysis score (VGAS) was computed to compare system and positioning performance assessments across different categories and facilities. Median average glandular dose (AGD) values for cranio caudal and medio lateral oblique views were calculated for each category and facility and compared to the national diagnostic reference levels. The health facilities were categorised by considering both IQ VGAS and AGD levels. Inter-rater agreement between radiologists ranged from poor (κ< 0.20) to moderate (0.41 <κ< 0.60), likely influenced by inherent biases and distinct IQ expectations. 50% of the facilities were classified as needing corrective actions for their system performance as they had IQ or high AGD that could increase recall rate and radiation risk and 50% of the health facilities exhibited insufficient positioning performance that could mask tumour masses and microcalcifications. The study's findings emphasise the importance of implementing quality assurance programs to ensure optimal IQ for accurate diagnoses while adhering to radiation exposure guidelines. Additionally, comprehensive training for technologists is essential to address positioning challenges. These initiatives collectively aim to enhance the overall quality of breast imaging services, contributing to improved patient care.

National survey to update the diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology procedures in Italy: working methodology.

Interventional Radiology (IR) deals with the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases through medically guided imaging. It provides unquestionable benefits to patients, but requires, in many cases, the use of high doses of ionizing radiation with a high impact on radiation risks to patients and to overall dose to the population. The International Commission on Radiological Protection introduced Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as an effective tool to facilitate dose verification and optimize protection for patients undergoing radiological procedures. In addition, EURATOM Council Directive 2013/59 and its Italian transposition (Legislative Decree 101/2020) have reiterated that DRLs must be established for many common radiological diagnostic procedures to compare the radiation dose delivered for the same diagnostic examination. Within this framework, Istituto Superiore di Sanità-Italian National Institute of Health (ISS)-, in collaboration with relevant Italian Scientific Societies, has provided documents on DRLs in radiological practices such as diagnostic and IR and diagnostic nuclear medicine. These reference documents enable National Hospitals to comply national regulation. The implementation of DRLs in IR is a difficult task because of the wide distribution of doses to patients even within the same procedure. Some studies have revealed that the amount of radiation in IR procedures is influenced more by the complexity of the procedure than by the weight of the patient, so complexity should be included in the definition of DRLs. For this reason, ISS promoted a survey among a sample of Italian Centers update national DRL in IR procedures with related complexity factors than can be useful for other radiological centers and to standardize the DRLs values. In the present paper the procedural methodology developed by ISS and used for the survey will be illustrated.

Diagnostic reference levels in spinal CT: Jordanian assessments and global benchmarks.

BACKGROUND: To reduce radiation dose and subsequent risks, several legislative documents in different countries describe the need for Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Spinal radiography is a common and high-dose examination. Therefore, the aim of this work was to establish the DRL for Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of the spine in healthcare institutions across Jordan. METHODS: Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS), which included the CT Dose Index (CTDI (vol) ) and Dose Length Product (DLP). The median radiation dose values of the dosimetric indices were calculated for each site. DRL values were defined as the 75th percentile distribution of the median CTDI (vol)  and DLP values. RESULTS: Data was collected from 659 CT examinations (316 cervical spine and 343 lumbar-sacral spine). Of the participants, 68% were males, and the patients' mean weight was 69.7 kg (minimum = 60; maximum = 80, SD = 8.9). The 75th percentile for the DLP of cervical and LS-spine CT scans in Jordan were 565.2 and 967.7 mGy.cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates a wide range of variability in CTDI (vol)  and DLP values for spinal CT examinations; these variations were associated with the acquisition protocol and highlight the need to optimize radiation dose in spinal CT examinations.

Setting up regional diagnostic reference levels for pediatric computed tomography in Latin America: preliminary results, challenges and the work ahead.

We established a framework for collecting radiation doses for head, chest and abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) in children scanned at multiple imaging sites across Latin America with an aim towards establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) in pediatric CT in Latin America. Our study included 12 Latin American sites (in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras and Panama) contributing data on the four most common pediatric CT examinations (non-contrast head, non-contrast chest, post-contrast chest and post-contrast abdomen-pelvis). Sites contributed data on patients' age, sex and weight, scan factors (tube current and potential), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). Data were verified, leading to the exclusion of two sites with missing or incorrect data entries. We estimated overall and site-specific 50th (AD) and 75th (diagnostic reference level [DRL]) percentile CTDIvol and DLP for each CT protocol. Non-normal data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Sites contributed data from 3,934 children (1,834 females) for different CT exams (head CT 1,568/3,934, 40%; non-contrast chest CT 945/3,934, 24%; post-contrast chest CT 581/3,934, 15%; abdomen-pelvis CT 840/3,934, 21%). There were significant statistical differences in 50th and 75th percentile CTDIvol and DLP values across the participating sites (P<0.001). The 50th and 75th percentile doses for most CT protocols were substantially higher than the corresponding doses reported from the United States of America. Our study demonstrates substantial disparities and variations in pediatric CT examinations performed in multiple sites in Latin America. We will use the collected data to improve scan protocols and perform a follow-up CT study to establish DRLs and ADs based on clinical indications.

Estimation of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric head computed tomography in Yaoundé.

The diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are determined from dosimetry studies to compare and manage patient doses in medical imaging procedures. The aim of this work was to establish the first DRLs for pediatric patients during the most common computed tomography (CT) procedures in Yaoundé, Cameroon during routine head CT examinations to know how to improve our clinical practice tomorrow. The sample was classified per age group: ≤ 1-, 1-5-, 5-10- and 10-15-y-old. The retrospective study was used. The proposed DRLs were defined as 75th percentile of the median values of the distributions. In terms of Volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP), the DRLs obtained for the ages groups were: 28.6 mGy and 545.8 mGy.cm, 32.6 mGy and 735 mGy.cm, 37.1 mGy and 761.6 mGy.cm and 44.2 mGy and 1081.2 mGy.cm, respectively. DRLs in Yaoundé for DLP were higher than those of comparison literatures. The Yaoundé CTDIvol was higher than the comparison literatures except for the IAEA (2015) values for the three older age groups. The DRLs reported in Yaoundé were compared to Morocco 2020, Switzerland 2018, IAEA 2015 and Iran 2020 values. The estimation of this first DRL for pediatric head CT scan in Yaoundé must be a starting point to spread this investigation towards other examinations and imaging modalities across the country. Therefore, optimization of the CT scan procedures and orderly updates of local DRLs are necessary to improve radioprotection.

Trends in patient dose and compression force for digital (DR) mammography systems over an eleven-year period.

This study evaluated trends in patient dose and compression force for screening digital (DR) mammography systems. The results of five audits (carried out in 2011, 2014, 2018, 2020 and 2022) were compared. For every audit, anonymised screening examinations from each system consisting of the standard craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views of both breasts were analysed. Exposure parameters were extracted from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header and the mean glandular dose (MGD) for each image was calculated. Trends in the distribution of MGD, compressed breast thickness, compression force and compression force per radiographer were investigated. The mean MGD per image (and mean compressed breast thickness) was 1.20 mGy (58 mm), 1.53 mGy (59 mm), 1.83 mGy (61 mm), 1.94 mGy (60 mm) and 2.11 mGy (61 mm) for 2011, 2014, 2018, 2020 and 2022 respectively. The mean (and standard deviation) compression force was 114 (32) N, 112 (29) N, 108 (27) N, 104 (24) N and 100 (23) N for 2011, 2014, 2018, 2020 and 2022 respectively. The mean MGD per image has increased over time but remains below internationally established Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). This increase is primarily due to a change in the distribution of the different manufacturers and digital detector technologies, rather than an increase in the dose of the individual systems over time. The mean compression force has decreased over time in response to client feedback surveys. The standard deviation has also reduced, indicating more consistent application of force.