Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 198
Filter
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(2): e22841, 2021 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33493130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosis, arbitrary charges, annoying queues, and clinic waiting times among others are long-standing phenomena in the medical industry across the world. These factors can contribute to patient anxiety about misdiagnosis by clinicians. However, with the increasing growth in use of big data in biomedical and health care communities, the performance of artificial intelligence (Al) techniques of diagnosis is improving and can help avoid medical practice errors, including under the current circumstance of COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to visualize and measure patients' heterogeneous preferences from various angles of AI diagnosis versus clinicians in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. We also aim to illustrate the different decision-making factors of the latent class of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and prospects for the application of AI techniques in judgment and management during the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 and in the future. METHODS: A DCE approach was the main analysis method applied in this paper. Attributes from different dimensions were hypothesized: diagnostic method, outpatient waiting time, diagnosis time, accuracy, follow-up after diagnosis, and diagnostic expense. After that, a questionnaire is formed. With collected data from the DCE questionnaire, we apply Sawtooth software to construct a generalized multinomial logit (GMNL) model, mixed logit model, and latent class model with the data sets. Moreover, we calculate the variables' coefficients, standard error, P value, and odds ratio (OR) and form a utility report to present the importance and weighted percentage of attributes. RESULTS: A total of 55.8% of the respondents (428 out of 767) opted for AI diagnosis regardless of the description of the clinicians. In the GMNL model, we found that people prefer the 100% accuracy level the most (OR 4.548, 95% CI 4.048-5.110, P<.001). For the latent class model, the most acceptable model consists of 3 latent classes of respondents. The attributes with the most substantial effects and highest percentage weights are the accuracy (39.29% in general) and expense of diagnosis (21.69% in general), especially the preferences for the diagnosis "accuracy" attribute, which is constant across classes. For class 1 and class 3, people prefer the AI + clinicians method (class 1: OR 1.247, 95% CI 1.036-1.463, P<.001; class 3: OR 1.958, 95% CI 1.769-2.167, P<.001). For class 2, people prefer the AI method (OR 1.546, 95% CI 0.883-2.707, P=.37). The OR of levels of attributes increases with the increase of accuracy across all classes. CONCLUSIONS: Latent class analysis was prominent and useful in quantifying preferences for attributes of diagnosis choice. People's preferences for the "accuracy" and "diagnostic expenses" attributes are palpable. AI will have a potential market. However, accuracy and diagnosis expenses need to be taken into consideration.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Diagnosis , Patient Preference , Physicians , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , China , Choice Behavior , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Latent Class Analysis , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(4): 828-833, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cost-effective cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of patients with peritoneal malignancy remains an ongoing financial challenge for healthcare systems, hospitals and patients. This study aims to describe the detailed in-hospital costs of CRS and HIPEC compared with an Australian Activity Based Funding (ABF) system, and to evaluate how the learning curve, disease entities and surgical outcomes influence in-hospital costs. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive costing review of all CRS and HIPEC cases undertaken at a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia from April 2017 to June 2019. In-hospital cost variables included staff, critical care, diagnosis, operating theatre, and other costs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the differences between actual cost and the provision of funding, and potential factors associated with these costs. RESULTS: Of the 118 CRS and HIPEC procedures included in the analyses, the median total cost was AU$130,804 (IQR: 105,744 to 153,972). Provision of funding via the ABF system was approximately one-third of the total CRS and HIPEC costs (p < 0.001). Surgical staff proficiency seems to reduce the total CRS and HIPEC costs. Surgical time, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay are the main predictors of total CRS and HIPEC costs. CONCLUSION: Delivery of CRS and HIPEC is expensive with high variability. A standard ABF system grossly underestimates the specific CRS and HIPEC funding required with supplementation essential to sustaining this complex highly specialised service.


Subject(s)
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/economics , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/economics , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy/economics , Peritoneal Neoplasms/economics , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Australia , Clinical Competence , Costs and Cost Analysis , Critical Care/economics , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Female , Financing, Government/methods , Health Personnel/economics , Humans , Learning Curve , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms/economics , Operative Time , Peritoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies
5.
Value Health ; 23(10): 1300-1306, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032773

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Diagnostics Assessment Programme (DAP) evaluates the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic technologies. A decision-making process benchmarking the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) against a threshold while considering decision-modifying factors is common to NICE evaluations. This study investigated whether DAP decisions are consistent with the ICER thresholds described in the DAP manual, and to assess the impact of decision-modifying factors. METHODS: DAP evaluations published before March 2018 were reviewed, and the following items were extracted: diagnostic technologies evaluated, decision problems assessed, Diagnostics Advisory Committee (DAC) decisions, incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental costs, ICERs considered to be most plausible by the DAC, and decision justifications. RESULTS: All 30 evaluations were reviewed; 8 were excluded because the DAC concluded there was "insufficient evidence" for decision making. In the remaining 22 evaluations, 91 decision problems were identified for further analysis, of which 52, 15, and 24 received "recommended," "not recommended," and "not recommended-only in research" guidance, respectively. The overall consistency rate of the DAC decisions with the £20 000/QALY threshold was 73.6%. Diagnostic technologies that were not recommended, despite an ICER less than £20 000/QALY, were associated with a larger number of decision-modifying factors favoring the comparator, versus recommended diagnostic technologies with ICERs less than £20 000/QALY. For technologies with ICERs greater than £20 000/QALY, the number of decision-modifying factors was comparable for positive and negative recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Most DAP decisions were consistent with the ICER threshold. However, cost-effectiveness was not the only determining factor in decision making; recommendations also considered patient- and healthcare-centric factors and uncertainty.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Decision Making, Organizational , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/standards , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , State Medicine/organization & administration , State Medicine/standards , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/standards , United Kingdom
6.
J Med Econ ; 23(11): 1340-1344, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the clinical and economic impact of two PD-L1 IHC assays, SP142 versus 22C3, to identify the eligibility of the patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) to the treatment with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in the Brazilian private healthcare system (BPHS). METHODS: The study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a partitioned-survival model with three mutually exclusive health states: progression-free (PF), progression, and death. Data of progression-free survival and overall survival were extracted from a retrospective exploratory analysis of IMpassion130, an analytical harmonization of PD-L1 IHC assays. The analyses included only direct costs (drug acquisition and management of adverse events) that were based on CBHPM (Classificação Brasileira Hierarquizada de Procedimentos Médicos) and CMED PF18% (Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos) tables. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed as a second-order Monte Carlo Simulation in order to evaluate the uncertainties of the model. RESULTS: The SP142 assay has the potential to improve PFS and generate savings to the BPHS. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was -USD 4,119.43 per month of progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SP142 assay demonstrated to be a dominant alternative compared to 22C3 to guide the treatment with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with aTNBC.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/analysis , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Brazil , Female , Humans , Models, Econometric , Progression-Free Survival
7.
Chest ; 158(6): 2517-2523, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32882245

ABSTRACT

There is an evolution of pleural procedures that involve broadened clinical indication and expanded scope that include advanced diagnostic, therapeutic, and palliative procedures. Finance and clinical professionals have been challenged to understand the indication and coding complexities that accompany these procedures. This article describes the utility of pleural procedures, the appropriate current procedural terminology coding, and necessary modifiers. Coding pearls that help close the knowledge gap between basic and advanced procedures aim to address coding confusion that is prevalent with pleural procedures and the risk of payment denials, potential underpayment, and documentation audits.


Subject(s)
Current Procedural Terminology , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Pleural Diseases , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/classification , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Humans , Pleural Diseases/diagnosis , Pleural Diseases/economics , Pleural Diseases/therapy , Pulmonary Medicine/economics , Pulmonary Medicine/methods , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Relative Value Scales , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/economics , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/methods
8.
Sensors (Basel) ; 20(6)2020 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197330

ABSTRACT

Traditional motion capture systems are the current standard in the assessment of knee joint kinematics. These systems are, however, very costly, complex to handle, and, in some conditions, fail to estimate the varus/valgus and internal/external rotation accurately due to the camera setup. This paper presents a novel and comprehensive method to infer the full relative motion of the knee joint, including the flexion/extension, varus/valgus, and internal/external rotation, using only low cost inertial measurement units (IMU) connected to the upper and lower leg. Furthermore, sensors can be placed arbitrarily and only require a short calibration, making it an easy-to-use and portable clinical analysis tool. The presented method yields both adequate results and displays the uncertainty band on those results to the user. The proposed method is based on an fixed interval smoother relying on a simple dynamic model of the legs and judicially chosen constraints to estimate the rigid body motion of the leg segments in a world reference frame. In this pilot study, benchmarking of the method on a calibrated robotic manipulator, serving as leg analogue, and comparison with camera-based techniques confirm the method's accurateness as an easy-to-implement, low-cost clinical tool.


Subject(s)
Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Biosensing Techniques , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Knee Joint/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Biosensing Techniques/economics , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/instrumentation , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Statistics as Topic/instrumentation , Statistics as Topic/methods , Weights and Measures/instrumentation
9.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 5(5): 454-464, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32061322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) places a significant burden on health-care systems because of its chronicity and need for expensive therapies and surgery. With increasing use of biological therapies, contemporary data on IBD health-care costs are important for those responsible for allocating resources in Europe. To our knowledge, no prospective long-term analysis of the health-care costs of patients with IBD in the era of biologicals has been done in Europe. We aimed to investigate cost profiles of a pan-European, community-based inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: The Epi-IBD cohort is a community-based, prospective inception cohort of unselected patients with IBD diagnosed in 2010 at centres in 20 European countries plus Israel. Incident patients who were diagnosed with IBD according to the Copenhagen Diagnostic Criteria between Jan 1, and Dec 31, 2010, and were aged 15 years or older the time of diagnosis were prospectively included. Data on clinical characteristics and direct costs (investigations and outpatient visits, blood tests, treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries) were collected prospectively using electronic case-report forms. Patient-level costs incorporated procedures leading to the initial diagnosis of IBD and costs of IBD management during the 5-year follow-up period. Costs incurred by comorbidities and unrelated to IBD were excluded. We grouped direct costs into the following five categories: investigations (including outpatient visits and blood tests), conventional medical treatment, biological therapy, hospitalisation, and surgery. FINDINGS: The study population consisted of 1289 patients with IBD, with 1073 (83%) patients from western Europe and 216 (17%) from eastern Europe. 488 (38%) patients had Crohn's disease, 717 (56%) had ulcerative colitis, and 84 (6%) had IBD unclassified. The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up for patients with IBD was €2609 (SD 7389; median €446 [IQR 164-1849]). The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up was €3542 (8058; median €717 [214-3512]) for patients with Crohn's disease, €2088 (7058; median €408 [133-1161]) for patients with ulcerative colitis, and €1609 (5010; median €415 [92-1228]) for patients with IBD unclassified (p<0·0001). Costs were highest in the first year and then decreased significantly during follow-up. Hospitalisations and diagnostic procedures accounted for more than 50% of costs during the first year. However, in subsequent years there was a steady increase in expenditure on biologicals, which accounted for 73% of costs in Crohn's disease and 48% in ulcerative colitis, in year 5. The mean annual cost per patient-year for biologicals was €866 (SD 3056). The mean yearly costs of biological therapy were higher in patients with Crohn's disease (€1782 [SD 4370]) than in patients with ulcerative colitis (€286 [1427]) or IBD unclassified (€521 [2807]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Overall direct expenditure on health care decreased over a 5-year follow-up period. This period was characterised by increasing expenditure on biologicals and decreasing expenditure on conventional medical treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries. In light of the expenditures associated with biological therapy, cost-effective treatment strategies are needed to reduce the economic burden of inflammatory bowel disease. FUNDING: Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond and Nordsjællands Hospital Forskningsråd.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/economics , Colitis, Ulcerative/economics , Crohn Disease/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/therapy , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/economics , Europe , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs/trends , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
10.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 129(1): 39-45, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31416326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is an important facet of numerous disease states ranging from sinonasal disease to neurocognitive disorders. Due to expense and/or logistical barriers, objective olfactory testing is not common. We describe the creation of a novel, essential oil-based smell test, Affordable Rapid Olfaction Measurement Array (AROMA), composed at 14 scents at different concentrations and demonstrate correlation of AROMA with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), patient age, Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22), and perceived loss of smell. METHODS: AROMA was developed for point-of-care olfactory testing and compared to the UPSIT, as well as subjective outcome measures as noted above. About 37 healthy controls were prospectively recruited to assess the reliability of AROMA using a test-retest protocol. An additional cohort of 38 participants with sinonasal disease were prospectively recruited to complete the AROMA and UPSIT, and were compared with a cohort of 30 healthy controls. Spearman correlation correlated AROMA and UPSIT results, patient age, SNOT-22, and perceived loss of smell. RESULTS: AROMA demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.85, P < .001). Spearman's rho correlation of AROMA to UPSIT was statistically significant at ρ = 0.75 (P < .001). SNOT-22, age, and perceived sense of smell were all significantly correlated with both AROMA (ρ = -0.548, -0.557, -0.642, respectively) and UPSIT (ρ = -0.367, -0.460, -0.552, respectively). CONCLUSION: AROMA has a strong correlation with UPSIT and may be more strongly correlated with sinonasal outcomes. Additionally, AROMA is reusable; level of odorant is not static; and AROMA can test both odor detection and identification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.


Subject(s)
Odorants , Oils, Volatile , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Point-of-Care Testing , Sensory Thresholds , Sino-Nasal Outcome Test
11.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 29(3): e13198, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early palliative care team consultation has been shown to reduce costs of hospital care. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between palliative care team (PCT) consultation and the content and costs of hospital care in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted in 12 Dutch hospitals. Patients with advanced cancer and an estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year were included. We compared hospital care during 3 months of follow-up for patients with and without PCT involvement. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of PCTs on costs of hospital care. Additionally, gamma regression models were estimated to assess predictors of hospital costs. RESULTS: We included 535 patients of whom 126 received PCT consultation. Patients with PCT had a worse life expectancy (life expectancy <3 months: 62% vs. 31%, p < .01) and performance status (p < .01, e.g., WHO status higher than 2:54% vs. 28%) and more often had no more options for anti-tumour therapy (57% vs. 30%, p < .01). Hospital length of stay, use of most diagnostic procedures, medication and other therapeutic interventions were similar. The total mean hospital costs were €8,393 for patients with and €8,631 for patients without PCT consultation. Analyses using propensity scores to control for observed confounding showed no significant difference in hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: PCT consultation for patients with cancer in Dutch hospitals often occurs late in the patients' disease trajectories, which might explain why we found no effect of PCT consultation on costs of hospital care. Earlier consultation could be beneficial to patients and reduce costs of care.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Critical Care/economics , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Enteral Nutrition/economics , Enteral Nutrition/statistics & numerical data , Female , Functional Status , Hospices , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Life Expectancy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/economics , Netherlands , Patient Discharge , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/economics , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Survival Rate
14.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 7(9): e11229, 2019 09 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31516128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of paroxysmal events in infants is often challenging. Reasons include the child's inability to express discomfort and the inability to record video electroencephalography at home. The prevalence of mobile phones, which can record videos, may be beneficial to these patients. In China, this advantage may be even more significant given the vast population and the uneven distribution of medical resources. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the value of mobile phone videos in increasing the diagnostic accuracy and cost savings of paroxysmal events in infants. METHODS: Clinical data, including descriptions and home videos of episodes, from 12 patients with paroxysmal events were collected. The investigation was conducted in six centers during pediatric academic conferences. All 452 practitioners present were asked to make their diagnoses by just the descriptions of the events, and then remake their diagnoses after watching the corresponding home videos of the episodes. The doctor's information, including educational background, profession, working years, and working hospital level, was also recorded. The cost savings from accurate diagnoses were measured on the basis of using online consultation, which can also be done easily by mobile phone. All data were recorded in the form of questionnaires designed for this study. RESULTS: We collected 452 questionnaires, 301 of which met the criteria (66.6%) and were analyzed. The mean correct diagnoses with and without videos was 8.4 (SD 1.7) of 12 and 7.5 (SD 1.7) of 12, respectively. For epileptic seizures, mobile phone videos increased the mean accurate diagnoses by 3.9%; for nonepileptic events, it was 11.5% and both were statistically different (P=.006 for epileptic events; P<.001 for nonepileptic events). Pediatric neurologists with longer working years had higher diagnostic accuracy; whereas, their working hospital level and educational background made no difference. For patients with paroxysmal events, at least US $673.90 per capita and US $128 million nationwide could be saved annually, which is 12.02% of the total cost for correct diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Home videos made on mobile phones are a cost-effective tool for the diagnosis of paroxysmal events in infants. They can facilitate the diagnosis of paroxysmal events in infants and thereby save costs. The best choice for infants with paroxysmal events on their initial visit is to record their events first and then show the video to a neurologist with longer working years through online consultation.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/standards , Smartphone/trends , Videotape Recording/methods , Child, Preschool , China , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prospective Studies , Seizures/classification , Seizures/diagnosis , Smartphone/economics , Smartphone/instrumentation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Videotape Recording/standards , Videotape Recording/trends
15.
Med Decis Making ; 39(7): 857-866, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31556806

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic tests are expensive and time-consuming to develop. Early economic evaluation using decision modeling can reduce commercial risk by providing early evidence on cost-effectiveness. The National Institute for Health Research Diagnostic Evidence Co-operatives (DECs) was established to catalyze evidence generation for diagnostic tests by collaborating with commercial developers; DEC researchers have consequently made extensive use of early modeling. The aim of this article is to summarize the experiences of the DECs using early modeling for diagnostics. We draw on 8 case studies to illustrate the methods, highlight methodological strengths and weaknesses particular to diagnostics, and provide advice. The case studies covered diagnosis, screening, and treatment stratification. Treatment effectiveness was a crucial determinant of cost-effectiveness in all cases, but robust evidence to inform this parameter was sparse. This risked limiting the usability of the results, although characterization of this uncertainty in turn highlighted the value of further evidence generation. Researchers evaluating early models must be aware of the importance of treatment effect evidence when reviewing the cost-effectiveness of diagnostics. Researchers planning to develop an early model of a test should also 1) consult widely with clinicians to ensure the model reflects real-world patient care; 2) develop comprehensive models that can be updated as the technology develops, rather than taking a "quick and dirty" approach that may risk producing misleading results; and 3) use flexible methods of reviewing evidence and evaluating model results, to fit the needs of multiple decision makers. Decision models can provide vital information for developers at an early stage, although limited evidence mean researchers should proceed with caution.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Models, Economic , Biomedical Technology/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Critical Pathways , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stakeholder Participation , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
16.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 69(Suppl 2)(6): S131-S136, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31369543

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis (TB), along with the human immunodeficiency virus, is one of the leading causes of death from infectious diseases. Its prevalence has rendered the treatment of drug-resistant TB a major public health problem that threatens the progress made in TB care and control worldwide. Our objectives were to conduct a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB/XDR-TB) and to synthesise available data from scientific research. METHODS: Using English keywords, we searched for papers over reputable databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar, from Jan. 23 to Mar. 23, 2019. RESULTS: The search and screening yielded 13 articles, whose results were extracted and reviewed to draw conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of MDR-TB/XDR-TB treatment. The data extraction table used to cull and categorise the results comprised the characteristics of a given study, as well as its objectives, the perspectives used to guide the investigation, methods and results (outcome, sensitivity analysis). The measured outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The review indicated that MDR -TB/XDR-TB treatment can be very cost-effective in countries with low to high incomes, regardless of whether minimal or considerable disease burdens exist.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/therapy , Hospitalization/economics , Antitubercular Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developing Countries , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Efficiency , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/economics , Food Services/economics , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Transportation/economics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/economics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/therapy
17.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 17(6): 827-839, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392669

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current strategies for risk stratification of patients with acute myeloid leukemia assign approximately 40% of patients to the intermediate-risk group, where uncertainty about optimal therapy still persists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of a HMGA2 prognostic test based on HMGA2+/HMGA2- expression, which improves genetic risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia, and compare this test with the current standard of care in Canada. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed from the Canadian National Healthcare Service and societal perspective using data from the Quebec Leukemia Cell Bank, published literature, and physician surveys. The model includes a lifetime horizon assessing the HMGA2 test vs. standard of care. RESULTS: The HMGA2 test outperformed the standard of care at all time horizons culminating with estimated improvements of 1.92 and 3.12 months in leukemia-free survival and overall survival, respectively. Costs associated with the HMGA2 test were consistently lower, except diagnostic costs, routine medical costs, and costs related to infections and false positives. From a societal perspective, total lifetime costs were $161,358 CAD and $151,908 CAD with the standard of care and the HMGA2 test, respectively. The incremental quality-adjusted life-year gain was 0.138, which led to dominance over the standard of care. Deterministic sensitivity analyses confirmed the results of the base-case scenario. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that for a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 CAD, the probability of cost effectiveness was 87.19%. CONCLUSIONS: The HMGA2 test is estimated to improve leukemia-free survival and overall survival outcomes, and yield costs savings from a healthcare system and societal perspective.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , HMGA2 Protein/analysis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/physiopathology , Biomarkers/analysis , Canada , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Prognosis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
18.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 123(5): 468-475, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31419490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonprescription of penicillin-containing antibiotics in patients diagnosed with penicillin allergy is associated with morbidity and mortality. Adverse reactions to penicillins comprise type A and B reactions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of penicillin allergy evaluation without penicillin skin testing (PST) for adult patients with type B reactions and the health and economic benefits of this process. METHODS: Inpatients at an Australian tertiary hospital between April 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, with a diagnosis of type B penicillin allergy, requiring a penicillin-containing antibiotic for treatment, were included. All patients underwent clinical history review, PST, and drug provocation testing (DPT). RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty-three reported a history of type B or unknown adverse reactions. No patients had a history of anaphylaxis requiring intubation or epinephrine within the last 10 years or a history suggesting Gell and Coombs type 2, 3, or 4 (severe) hypersensitivity reaction. Seven did not complete DPT because the treating team used a ß-lactam antibiotic other than amoxicillin. Fifty-four of 56 remaining patients (96%) completed 3-day DPT to amoxicillin with no adverse reaction. Two experienced mild cutaneous reactions. Penicillin allergy evaluation was significantly associated with reduced length of stay, reduced hospital expenditure on bed and second-line antibiotics, and reduced readmission rates. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy evaluation with DPT without PST may be feasible for all adult patients with a reported history of type B reactions to penicillins who do not have a history of anaphylaxis within the last 10 years or a type 2, 3, or 4 (severe) hypersensitivity reaction.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Aged , Australia , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Drug Hypersensitivity/economics , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Tertiary Care Centers
19.
Pharm Stat ; 18(5): 533-545, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069929

ABSTRACT

Cost and burden of diagnostic testing may be reduced if fewer tests can be applied. Sequential testing involves selecting a sequence of tests, but only administering subsequent tests dependent on results of previous tests. This research provides guidance to choosing between single tests or the believe the positive (BP) and believe the negative (BN) sequential testing strategies, using accuracy (as measured by the Youden Index) as the primary determinant. Approximately 75% of the parameter combinations examined resulted in either BP or BN being recommended based on a higher accuracy at the optimal point. In about half of the scenarios BP was preferred, and the other half, BN, with the choice often a function of the value of the ratio of standard deviations of those without and with disease (b). Large values of b for the first test of the sequence tended to be associated with preference for BN as opposed to BP, while small values of b appear to favor BP. When there was no preference between sequences and/or single tests based on the Youden Index, cost of the sequence was considered. In this case, disease prevalence plays a large role in the selection of strategies, with lower values favoring BN and sometimes higher values favoring BP. The cost threshold for the sequential strategy to be preferred over a single, more accurate test, was often quite high. It appears that while sequential strategies most often increase diagnostic accuracy over a single test, sequential strategies are not always preferred.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
20.
Indian J Tuberc ; 66(1): 87-91, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30797290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Private healthcare is choice of point of care for 70% of Indians. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment is costly and involves duration as long as 2 years. AIM: To estimate costs to patients undergoing treatment for MDR-TB. METHODS: A health-economics questionnaire was administered to 50 consecutive patients who successfully completed ambulatory private treatment for MDR-TB. Direct costs included drug costs, investigations, consultation fees, travel costs, hospitalisation and invasive procedures and cost prior to presentation to us. Indirect costs included loss of income. RESULTS: Of our cohort of 50 patients, 36 had pulmonary TB while 14 had extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB). 40 had MDR-TB and 10 had XDR-TB. There were 15 males and 35 females. Mean age was 30 years (range 16-61 years). Treatment cost for pulmonary MDR-TB averaged $5723 while it averaged $8401 for pulmonary XDR-TB and $5609 for EPTB. The major expense was due to drug costs (37%) while consultation fees were only 5%. Annual individual income for the cohort ranged from $0 to $63,000 (mean $11,430). On average, the cost of treatment ranged from 2.56% to 180.34% of the annual family income. 34/50 (68%) had total costs greater than 20% of annual family income and 39/50 (78%) had total costs greater than 10% of annual family income. The number of patients with total costs >40% of total family income was 22. CONCLUSION: MDR-TB in the private sector results in "catastrophic health costs". Financial and social support is essential for patients undergoing treatment for MDR-TB.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/economics , Health Expenditures , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/economics , Adult , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Drug Costs , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , India , Male , Tertiary Care Centers , Travel/economics , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/economics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/economics , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...