A tale of two studies: is peripheral eosinophilia associated with Dientamoeba fragilis detection in adult stool samples?

The protozoan parasite Dientamoeba fragilis is a frequently isolated stool organism and postulated cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. Peripheral blood eosinophilia has been described. This is the first study amongst the Australasian adult population to assess the relationship between organism detection and eosinophilia. A case-control study took place over 7 years at a single Sydney laboratory site, evaluating patients with D. fragilis identified on stool using real-time PCR with a recent full blood count, to control groups with Giardia spp. and sequential negatives with neither organism. A nested study compared those with microscopic evidence of D. fragilis as a marker of disease burden, to molecular diagnosis alone. Sixty-four D. fragilis, 30 Giardia spp., and 94 sequential controls were enrolled. Only 60.1% of samples were preserved in sodium acetate-acetic acid formalin (SAF) fixative, indication mostly not documented. The major co-organism detected amongst all participants was Blastocystis sp., particularly in the D. fragilis cohort (37.2%). The most common pathogen amongst sequential controls was Campylobacter spp. (7.4%). Patients with D. fragilis were more likely (12.5%) to have a clinically significant eosinophilia (>0.5×109/L) compared to those with Giardia spp. (3.3%) or sequential controls (4.3%) (p=0.03). A significant difference was also noted in the overall median eosinophil count of those with D. fragilis versus all controls (0.2 vs 0.1×109/L, p=0.01); however, this was within the reference interval (where up to >0.5×109/L is accepted in healthy individuals within a typical population). No eosinophil difference was found between those with molecular versus additional microscopic detection of D. fragilis (0.1 vs 0.1×109/L). These results support an association between the identification of clinically significant peripheral blood eosinophilia and D. fragilis presence, which may impact the diagnostic approach to the patient with unexplained eosinophilia. Further prospective trials may help assess any significance further and the implication of co-carriage with other enteric organisms. The importance of clinical indication and need for appropriate fixative media in diagnostic parasitology are also highlighted.

Detection of Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis using conventional and molecular methods in patients with celiac disease.

Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis are intestinal protists, which are common worldwide, but the pathogenic role of these organisms in gastrointestinal diseases is still controversial. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis in stool samples from adult patients with celiac disease (CD) by using conventional and molecular methods. A total of 75 patients with CD and 75 healthy individuals were included in this study. Fresh stool specimens collected from each individual were analyzed by conventional and molecular methods. The overall prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis was 41.3% (31/75) and 24% (18/75) in patients with CD, and 46.7% (35/75) and 13.3% (10/75) in healthy controls, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis between CD patients and healthy individuals. Blastocystis sp. subtypes were identified in 20 CD and 16 control patients and the overall subtype distribution was observed as ST1 13.9%, ST2 30.6%, and ST3 55.6%. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis in adults with CD is similar to the prevalence of protozoa in healthy adults. In this study, the most prevalent Blastocystis subtype was ST3 and the most frequent allele was a34 in both CD patients and healthy individuals. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the detection rates of Blastocystis sp. and D. fragilis, and it is thought that both protists may be colonisers of the intestinal microbiome.

Observations on the transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis and the cyst life cycle stage.

Little is known about the life cycle and mode of transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis. Recently it was suggested that fecal­oral transmission of cysts may play a role in the transmission of D. fragilis. In order to establish an infection, D. fragilis is required to remain viable when exposed to the pH of the stomach. In this study, we investigated the ability of cultured trophozoites to withstand the extremes of pH. We provide evidence that trophozoites of D. fragilis are vulnerable to highly acidic conditions. We also investigated further the ultrastructure of D. fragilis cysts obtained from mice and rats by transmission electron microscopy. These studies of cysts showed a clear cyst wall surrounding an encysted parasite. The cyst wall was double layered with an outer fibrillar layer and an inner layer enclosing the parasite. Hydrogenosomes, endoplasmic reticulum and nuclei were present in the cysts. Pelta-axostyle structures, costa and axonemes were identifiable and internal flagellar axonemes were present. This study therefore provides additional novel details and knowledge of the ultrastructure of the cyst stage of D. fragilis.

Detection and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis from symptomatic patients: New insights from Italy into a little-known gastrointestinal protozoan.

Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis) represents a common protozoan in both high and low income countries. Despite this, epidemiological data on dientamoebiasis are still limited, and it is possible that the actual prevalence rates of D. fragilis have been underestimated due to the challenges in its detection and identification. In the present study, symptomatic patients from Rome (Central Italy) were surveyed for two years to determine D. fragilis percentage of infection and genotypes. Stool samples collection was performed over 864 patients, DNA extracted, and RT-PCR performed by the SeeGene Allplex™ Gastrointestinal Parasite Panel Assays. Seventy-nine resulted positive for D. fragilis (9.1%). Co-infections were detected in 22 isolates: 21 displayed Blastocystis sp. + D. fragilis (27.8%). Based on the sequence of a central fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, only genotype 1 was identified. These findings are among the few available data regarding genetic diversity of D. fragilis in Italy. Large-scale human and animal research are required to enhance our knowledge of prevalence, host range, genetic variability and zoonotic transmission of this little-known intestinal protozoan.

First detection and molecular characterization of Dientamoeba fragilis in cattle.

Dientamoeba fragilis is a flagellated protozoan with amoeba-like morphology that inhabits the human gastrointestinal tract. It is endemic in a vast geography around the world, including developed countries. There are limited studies on non-human hosts of the parasite, and suitable hosts have not been clarified. The parasite has been detected in non-human primates, pigs, cats, dogs and rats. There is no study in the literature investigating and detecting the presence of this parasite in cattle. In this study, stool samples taken from 163 different cattle and calves from 11 different farms between March 2017 and May 2022 were examined for the detection of D. fragilis via PCR. Trichrome staining was performed on all PCR-positive samples. The isolates with the expected amplicon size were sequenced using the 18S ribosomal RNA region, and their genotypes were determined by BLAST analysis. Sequences were analysed with the most similar and reference sequences in the literature, forming a phylogenetic tree. We detected D. fragilis in 31 (19.01%) of the 163 stool samples. D. fragilis cysts/trophozoites were detected by trichrome staining method in six of 31 samples. All PCR products selected for molecular analysis from positive samples had the same nucleotide sequence. As a result of BLAST analysis, all sequences were determined to belong to D. fragilis genotype 1. This study determined for the first time that cattle are suitable hosts for D. fragilis. Furthermore, the parasite subtype we detected belongs to genotype 1, which is the most common type in humans, suggesting that the parasite may have a zoonotic character. Our result is important in terms of the epidemiology of the parasite, as the mode of transmission is controversial, and available data on its suitable hosts are limited.

First report and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis in pet budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), with zoonotic importance.

The protozoan Dientamoeba fragilis is one of the most common parasites in the digestive system of humans worldwide. The host range and transmission routes of D. fragilis, including the role of animals, are still ambiguous with few reports from non-human primates, sheep, rodents, pigs, a cat and a dog. In this study, we used microscopic and TaqMan qPCR analyses to investigate D. fragilisin 150 faecal samples from pet budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Dientamoeba fragilis DNA was detected in 32 samples, resulting in a mean prevalence of 21.3%. In microscopic examination, trophozoites/cysts of D. fragilis were detected in 13 of 32 qPCR-positive samples. SSU rRNA sequence analyses of the qPCR-positive isolates identified genotype 1 of D. fragilis as predominant in budgerigars. Phylogenetic analyses of the SSU rRNA gene region clustered D. fragilis genotypes, as well as other trichomonads, in separate monophyletic clusters with bootstrap values ≥79.0. Our study provides the first evidence for the natural host status of pet budgerigars for D. fragilisand contributes to the knowledge of the epidemiology of this parasite. The high prevalence of genotype 1 of D. fragilis suggests that pet budgerigars are suitable reservoirs for zoonotic transmission. Our findings contribute to an increased awareness and knowledge of D. fragilis infections in the context of a one-health approach.

Dientamoeba fragilis in the North-East of Italy: Prevalence study and treatment.

Dientamoeba fragilis is an intestinal protozoan, an inhabitant of the human gastrointestinal tract, with a worldwide distribution. The reported prevalence of D. fragilis varies worldwide in different populations between 0.3% and 82.9%, and its role as a pathogen is still unclear. The parasite has been identified in the faeces of asymptomatic patients and with different acute and chronic symptoms, like abdominal pain, diarrhoea, flatulence, nausea and vomiting. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of D. fragilis in the North-East of Italy, and the clinical improvement of symptoms after recommended treatment with paromomycin or metronidazole. Furthermore, a literature review of D. fragilis prevalence studies in Italy was carried out to show the Italian situation. Of 575 enrolled people, 85 (14.8%) were positive for D. fragilis. The most prevalent symptoms were abdominal pain 28.2%, anal itching 27.1%, watery diarrhoea 18.8%, meteorism 16.5% and nausea/lack of appetite 14.1%. The high rate of anal itching was unexpected, because it wasn't a common symptom. 32 patients were co-infected with B. hominis (37.7%) and three with G. lamblia (3.5%). Our study showed paromomycin had a high efficacy for treatment of D. fragilis infections 100.0% (45/45), while caution must be used when using metronidazole 53.3% (24/40). We recommend paromomycin for empirical treatment, given its great effectiveness in our population.

Intestinal Microbiota in Children With Symptomatic Dientamoeba fragilis Infection: A Case-control Study.

BACKGROUND: Dientamoeba fragilis in children has been associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, like abdominal pain and diarrhea. The mechanism underlying these symptoms in children with D. fragilis remains unclear. We hypothesized that concomitant microbial alterations, which have been described in other parasitic infections, may be associated with gastrointestinal symptoms in D. fragilis. METHODS: In this case-control study performed in 2 centers, 19 children referred to a pediatrician because of gastrointestinal symptoms and with a positive fecal PCR for D. fragilis were included as cases. We included 19 healthy children as controls and matched for age and gender, selected from an existing cohort of 63 children. A PCR for D. fragilis was performed on fecal samples of the 19 controls to assess D. fragilis carriership in this asymptomatic group. Microbiota was analyzed with the IS-pro technique, and the intestinal microbiota composition and diversity were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Microbiota of children with D. fragilis and gastrointestinal symptoms did not significantly differ in terms of composition and diversity compared with controls, both on phylum and species level. In the asymptomatic controls, a positive fecal PCR for D. fragilis was found in 16 of 19 (84.2%). CONCLUSION: Intestinal microbiota does not seem to play a key role in the presence of clinical symptoms in children with D. fragilis. The pathogenicity of D. fragilis and pathophysiologic pathways underlying the development of gastrointestinal symptoms remains yet to be clarified.

Diagnosis of intestinal protozoan infections in patients in Cuba by microscopy and molecular methods: advantages and disadvantages.

Microscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of intestinal parasitic diseases in many countries, including Cuba, although molecular approaches often have higher sensitivity as well as other advantages. Fecal samples from 133 patients were analyzed by light microscopy and also real-time multiplex qPCR targeting Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Entamoeba histolytica, and, separately, Dientamoeba fragilis. Microscopy revealed G. duodenalis occurred most commonly (17 patients), followed by Blastocystis spp. (12 patients). In a few patients, Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar, Cryptosporidium spp., and Cyclospora cayetanensis were identified. Molecular analysis identified 4 more G. duodenalis infections and 2 more Cryptosporidium spp. infections; concordance between microscopy and PCR showed almost perfect agreement for G. duodenalis (κ = 0.88) and substantial agreement for Cryptosporidium (κ = 0.74). PCR indicated that E. dispar, rather than E. histolytica, had been identified by microscopy. Additionally, 16 D. fragilis infections were detected using molecular methods. Although both microscopy and molecular techniques have a place in parasitology diagnostics, for parasites such as D. fragilis, where microscopy can underestimate occurrence, molecular techniques may be preferable, and also essential for distinguishing between morphologically similar microorganisms such as E. histolytica and E. dispar. Although in resource-constrained countries such as Cuba, microscopy is extremely important as a diagnostic tool for intestinal parasites, inclusion of molecular techniques could be invaluable for selected protozoa.

Dientamoeba fragilis Infection in Patients with Digestive and Non-Digestive Symptoms: A Case-Control Study.

In most developing countries, Dientamoeba fragilis infection is an obscure protozoan infection. We aimed to determine a frequency and clinical importance of D. fragilis infection in Taif, Saudi Arabia. A 1-year case control study included patients with gastrointestinal (cases, n=114) or non-gastrointestinal symptoms (controls, n=90). The fecal samples were examined with the classical parasitological methods for intestinal protozoa, and by real time PCR for D. fragilis. The infection by D. fragilis was detected in 5.8% by PCR and in 4.4% patients by microscopy. The infection was identified more in control group (n=9) than in cases (n=3); a sole infection in 11 patients and mixed with Giardia in 1 patient. The other enteric parasites detected were Blastocystis sp. (8.3%), Giardia sp. (5.3%), Cryptosporidium sp. (2.9%), Entamoeba histolytica (1.4%), Entamoeba coli (0.9%) and Hymenolepis nana (0.4%). Our results tend to reinforce the need to increase awareness of D. fragilis infection in Saudi Arabia.

Dientamoeba fragilis in children: a systematic review on diagnostic considerations and efficacy of treatment.

Introduction: The presence of D. fragilis in feces is characterized by an asymptomatic carrier ship to a spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms. However, a causal relationship remains to be elucidated. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the eradication of D. fragilis and symptoms to establish the strength of evidence that D. fragilis in symptomatic children warrants antibiotic treatment.Areas covered: This systematic review covers a challenge in daily clinical practice. Is it necessary to test for D. fragilis in children with gastrointestinal symptoms and does a positive fecal PCR test warrant treatment?Expert opinion: Testing for D. fragilis seems justified in a selection of children with persistent unexplained chronic abdominal pain and diarrhea. Treatment of D. fragilis should be withhold until other causes like celiac disease have been excluded. Both microscopic and Real Time-PCR methods (or a combination of the two) can be used for diagnosis. Paromomycin or clioquinol are antibiotics of choice based on their small spectrum of activity, fewer side effects, and better eradication rates than metronidazole. Future randomized studies, with strict inclusion criteria, appropriate diagnostic testing, and doses of antibiotics based on bodyweight are warranted.

Fecal calprotectin as a factor that supports the pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis.

Calprotectin is a protein that is mostly released from neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages and submucosal epithelial cells. Fecal calprotectin (f-CP) is a marker of intestinal inflammation. There are some discussions about the pathogenicity of D. fragilis in the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we investigated whether f-CP level is a factor supporting the pathogenicity of D. fragilis. The f-CP levels were evaluated in patients with only D. fragilis positive in comparison with healthy controls. Moreover, the levels of f-CP were investigated in fecal samples of D. fragilis negative patients with gastrointestinal complaints. The fecal samples were collected from three groups. Three groups of fecal samples were examined directly microscopy, trichrome staining, cultivation, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and real-time PCR assay. In the first group (Group 1, n = 34), patient stool samples with gastrointestinal symptoms (without other pathogens) found only with D. fragilis were included. In the second group (Group 2, n = 31), there were patients' stool samples with gastrointestinal symptoms that D. fragilis was negative (but there may be other pathogenic agents). In the control group (Group 3, n = 23), we used fecal samples collected from healthy volunteers without any infection or gastrointestinal complaints. The collected fecal samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Levels of f-CP were determined by using human calprotectin ELISA kits. Total of 88 patients were enrolled in three different groups. We obtained f-CP levels as follows: 33.40 ng/mg protein in the group 1, 15.99 ng/mg protein in the group 2 and 1.54 ng/mg protein in the group 3. Statistically significant difference in f-CP levels of the group 1 and the group 2 were obtained when compared with healthy controls (p < 0.0001). However, the f-CP levels of the group 1 were not significantly different from the group 2 (p > 0.99). In conclusion, increased levels of f-CP are shown as a marker of an inflammatory disease of the lower gastrointestinal tract in infected humans. There is continues controversy about the pathogenicity of D. fragilis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The findings of this study contribute to the ongoing debate about the pathogenicity of D. fragilis. In our study, the potential pathogenicity of D. fragilis is associated with increased f-CP concentrations with parasite detection in the fecal samples and therefore we assume that the parasite is not only a harmless commensal. In summary, higher levels of f-CP found in D. fragilis positive patients suggest the importance of researches that support the pathogenicity of indicated parasite.

Dientamoeba fragilis - the most common intestinal protozoan in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland, 2007 to 2017.

BackgroundDespite the global distribution of the intestinal protozoan Dientamoeba fragilis, its clinical picture remains unclear. This results from underdiagnosis: microscopic screening methods either lack sensitivity (wet preparation) or fail to reveal Dientamoeba (formalin-fixed sample).AimIn a retrospective study setting, we characterised the clinical picture of dientamoebiasis and compared it with giardiasis. In addition, we evaluated an improved approach to formalin-fixed samples for suitability in Dientamoeba diagnostics.MethodsThis study comprised four parts: (i) a descriptive part scrutinising rates of Dientamoeba findings; (ii) a methodological part analysing an approach to detect Dientamoeba-like structures in formalin samples; (iii) a clinical part comparing demographics and symptoms between patients with dientamoebiasis (n = 352) and giardiasis (n = 272), and (iv) a therapeutic part (n = 89 patients) investigating correlation between faecal eradication and clinical improvement.ResultsThe rate of Dientamoeba findings increased 20-fold after introducing criteria for Dientamoeba-like structures in formalin-fixed samples (88.9% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity). A further increase was seen after implementing faecal PCR. Compared with patients with giardiasis, the symptoms in the Dientamoeba group lasted longer and more often included abdominal pain, cramping, faecal urgency and loose rather than watery stools. Resolved symptoms correlated with successful faecal eradication (p < 0.001).ConclusionsPreviously underdiagnosed, Dientamoeba has become the most frequently recorded pathogenic enteroparasite in Finland. This presumably results from improved diagnostics with either PCR or detection of Dientamoeba-like structures in formalin-fixed samples, an approach applicable also in resource-poor settings. Symptoms of dientamoebiasis differ slightly from those of giardiasis; patients with distressing symptoms require treatment.

The importance of considering the neglected intestinal protozoan parasite Dientamoeba fragilis.

Dientamoebiasis is globally distributed and detected in a large number of subjects with diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, flatulence, fatigue and loss of appetite. The life cycle and transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis are poorly understood. Microscopic examination of permanent stained smears is traditionally employed to diagnose the infection. However, this approach is time-consuming and the success in detecting D. fragilis depends on the microscopist's experience. Hence, only a few laboratories routinely carry out tests for D. fragilis. Consequently, the prevalence of D. fragilis infection is probably underestimated. Although novel, rapid and more sensitive diagnostic tests are becoming available for detecting intestinal parasites, they also possess some limitations. The aim of this study was to emphasize the importance of performing microscopic examination of permanent stained smears from at least one fresh stool specimen after sample arrival at the laboratory, as a mandatory practice for the diagnosis of dientamoebiasis, particulary where it is not possible to perform molecular assays.

No association between abdominal pain and Dientamoeba in Dutch and Belgian children.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between Dientamoebafragilis colonisation and faecal calprotectin to see whether the parasite is a harmless commensal or a gut pathogen. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of previously collected stool samples. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Two hundred stool samples originated from children aged 5-19 years with chronic abdominal pain and diarrhoea, who were seen in paediatric clinics in the Netherlands and Belgium and in whom somatic gastrointestinal disorders were excluded. Another 122 samples came from a healthy community-based reference population of the same age. All stool samples were analysed with real-time PCR for the detection of D. fragilis and with an ELISA for calprotectin-a biomarker of gastrointestinal inflammation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of D. fragilis colonisation and results of stool calprotectin testing. RESULTS: D. fragilis was detected in 45% (95% CI 38% to 51%) of patients and in 71% (95% CI 63% to 79%) of healthy children. Median (IQR) concentrations of calprotectin in patients and healthy children with a positive PCR result were not different from those with a negative PCR result (40 (40-55) µg/g vs 40 (40-75) µg/g, respectively). CONCLUSION: Since D. fragilis colonisation is most prevalent in healthy children and is not associated with an increase in faecal calprotectin concentration, our data do not support the inference that D. fragilis is a pathogenic parasite. Routinely testing for D. fragilis in children with chronic abdominal pain should therefore be discouraged.

Blastocystis prevalence and subtypes in autochthonous and immigrant patients in a referral centre for parasitic infections in Italy.

In this study we characterized the presence and subtype (ST1-ST4) of Blastocystis in patients attended at a referral center for tropical diseases in Northern Italy. We also, evaluated the organism's association with other intestinal parasites. Parasite screening was performed on 756 patients, from different geographical origins (namely, Italians, Africans, South Americans, Asian and non-Italian Europeans) in which Italians represented the largest group. Blastocystis was seen to be the most prevalent parasite in the study. Subtype 3 and 1 were the most frequently found in the Italians and Africans. Our data confirmed previous studies performed in Italy, in which ST3 proved to be the most prevalent subtype, but we highlighted also a high frequency of mixed subtypes, which were probably underestimated in former analyses. Interestingly, the mixed subtypes group was the most prevalent in all the analysed geographical areas. About half of our cases showed other co-infecting parasites and the most frequent was Dientamoeba fragilis. Our study confirms that, in Blastocystis infection, multiple subtypes and co-infecting parasites are very frequently present, in particular Dientamoeba fragilis.

A clinical guideline on Dientamoeba fragilis infections.

Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis) is an intestinal parasite frequently detected in humans with abdominal pain and diarrhoea, but it is also commonly found in asymptomatic subjects. Hence its clinical relevance is often disputed. The introduction of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a versatile and sensitive diagnostic technique for the detection of intestinal parasites, and in some Western world countries PCR has almost completely replaced microscopic diagnostics. PCR has however resulted in an increase in the number of D. fragilis-positive patients. The disputed pathogenic nature of this intestinal parasite and an apparent increase in the incidence of patients with positive PCR results have renewed the discussions between clinicians and microbiologists on how to deal with an infected patient. Moreover, treatment guidelines differ throughout the world which makes it difficult for clinicians to choose an optimal therapeutic regimen.AimTo summarize and discuss the current knowledge on the pathogenicity, best diagnostic approach, treatment and follow-up of children and adults infected with D. fragilis.

[Dientamoeba fragilis infection in patients with gastrointestinal system complaints]. / Gastrointestinal sikayeti olan hastalarda dientamoeba fragilis enfeksiyonu.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of Dientamoeba fragilis with different diagnostic methods in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and determine the sensitivity and specificity of existing diagnostic methods. Fecal samples collected from 101 patients with gastrointestinal complaints (especially upper abdominal pain, abdominal and pelvic pain, nausea and vomiting, gastroenteritis and colitis, unexplained fever and diarrhea) and 20 control cases from various clinics were included in the study. Samples were first examined with native-Lugol (N-L) method and cultured in Robinson medium. All 121 stool and culture samples were stained with iron hematoxylin stain (IHS) and trichrome stain (TS) methods and examined by PCR and QPCR for D.fragilis. Among 121 stool samples 13 (10.7%), 2 (1.7%), 7 (5.7%) 13 (10.7%), and 7 (5.8%), 4 (3.3%), 2 (1.7%), 3 (2.5%) of cultured samples were determined positive with IHS, TS, PCR, QPCR respectively. Fifteen of the 121 stool samples were determined as diarrheal. All diarrheal stool samples were negative with IHS and TS. One of the diarrheal stools and 6 (4.9%) of the non-diarrheal stools were positive by PCR. All of the diarrheal stools were negative. Thirteen of the non-diarrheal stool samples (10.7%) were positive by QPCR. When the QPCR method was considered as gold standard, sensitivity and specificity values were determined as 46% and 93% in IHS, 0% and 99% in TS, 54% and 100% by PCR and sensitivity and specificity values were 67% and 96% in IHS, 33% and 98% in TS, 67% and 100% by PCR among cultured stool samples. As a result, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the samples of the patients and the control groups and the sensitivity and specificity of the conventional and molecular methods (IHS, TS, PCR and QPCR) determined in this study supported the results of other compared studies. It has been determined that staining methods used for the diagnosis of D.fragilis gave false positivite or negativite results. In addition, the QPCR method is more advantageous in terms of time saving for the diagnosis and initiation of the treatment and in cases where QPCR is not available, IHS and conventional PCR methods should be used together. In our opinion, this study will contribute to the results of epidemiological and scientific studies on D.fragilis in Turkey.

Does Dientamoeba fragilis cause diarrhea? A systematic review.

It remains controversial whether Dientamoeba fragilis is a commensal parasite or a pathogen. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the strength of the evidence that Dientamoeba fragilis would cause diarrhea. A search was performed for studies that reported either the association between D. fragilis detection in stools and diarrhea or diarrhea outcomes with D. fragilis therapy or challenge. Data from seven studies of specific populations reported that 22% had D. fragilis in stools of which only 23% had diarrhea. Eleven studies of stool samples submitted to laboratories reported that 4.3% of individuals had D. fragilis of which 54% had diarrhea. Twelve studies reported that D. fragilis was detected from 1.6% of individuals with diarrhea and 9.6% of diarrheal stools. Five studies analyzed the prevalence of D. fragilis in individuals with and without diarrhea; the two with a statistically significant difference between groups had discordant results. The only cohort study with an appropriate control group reported diarrhea in a higher proportion of children with D. fragilis than in controls. No D. fragilis treatment studies included diarrhea as an outcome. There were only two challenge studies involving one person each. In conclusion, the evidence that D. fragilis would cause diarrhea or that treatment would hasten diarrhea resolution is inconclusive.

Prevalence of D. fragilis infection in the household contacts of a group of infected patients.

INTRODUCTION: The results of a study on the household contacts of patients with D. fragilis infection are presented. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive study was carried out on all Dientamoeba fragilis-infected patients treated at the Tropical Medicine Unit of Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias between 2012- 2017 and their household contacts. Three stool samples per patient and three stool samples from each of their household contacts were concentrated and analysed. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect the presence of D. fragilis in all stool samples. Co-infection with E. vermicularis was studied in both groups. Patients and contacts who failed to deliver one or more samples for diagnosis and patients without household contacts were excluded. RESULTS: 44 Patients infected with D. fragilis, as well as their 97 household contacts were enrolled. 50.5% of household contacts had a positive PCR for D. fragilis. 20 were also coinfected with E. vermicularis. The presence of infection was significantly more frequent in patients with children (34/15 versus 24/24; p= 0.064; OR: 2.267 [0.988-5.199]), E. vermicularis infection in the children being 20/29 versus 0/48 (p=0.0001), and in another family member being 29/20 versus 15/33 (p=0.008; OR: 3.190 [1.384-7.352]). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of D. fragilis infection in household contacts was high. It was associated with the presence of children in the family nucleus and coinfection with E. vermicularis irrespective of gender, age, rural area or contact with animals.