Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Bioelectrochemistry ; 123: 9-18, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29715586

ABSTRACT

Electrochemotherapy became one of the therapeutic protocols successfully used in oncology. However, biological effects occurring in cells, especially those which are drug resistant, have not been studied thoroughly. This study presents response of wild and drug resistant breast cancer cells to classical photodynamic therapy with Photofrin or experimental photodynamic therapy with cyanine IR-775, combined with electroporation. Photodynamic reaction or electroporation alone had no cytotoxic effect, but their combination significantly disturbed cellular functions. Applying electroporation allowed the drugs to increase its accumulation, especially for a poorly permeant cyanine in drug resistant cells. FACS analysis showed that even at relatively mild electric field, ca. 90% of cells were permeabilized. High intracellular concentration of drugs triggered the cellular defense system through increased expression of glutathione S-transferase and multidrug resistance proteins (MDR1 and MRP7), particularly in drug resistant cells. Finally, expressively decreased cell metabolism and proliferation, as well as formation of apoptotic bodies and fragmentation of cells were observed after the combined treatment. The results show that electroporation can be used for effective delivery of photosensitizers, even to drug resistant breast cancer cells, which was not tested before. This shows that electro-photodynamic treatment could be a promising approach to overcome a problem of drug resistance in cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carbocyanines/pharmacology , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacology , Electrochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carbocyanines/administration & dosage , Carbocyanines/pharmacokinetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Membrane Permeability , Cell Survival/drug effects , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/administration & dosage , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics
2.
Biomed Microdevices ; 20(1): 3, 2017 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164403

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the drug delivery efficacy and bio-effectiveness of a novel photodynamic therapy (PDT)-matrix drug delivery system for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Metallic stents were coated with polyurethane (PU) as the first layer. A 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA)/ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA)/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) layer and a poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (PEVA)/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (PBMA)/polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 (K30) layer containing various concentrations of Photofrin were then incorporated onto the stent as the second and third layers. After incubating the layered membranes with cultured CCA cell line, the release of Photofrin, cell viability, the intracellular uptake of Photofrin, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and apoptosis were determined. Using a single-layer diffusion model, the maximum release of Photofrin from the 5 to 10% K30 formulas was 80 and 100%, respectively, after 24 h. When using the multiple-layer diffusion model, the released Photofrin showed an initial burst of the loading dose from the PEVA/PBMA/K30 layer. In the immobilized model, less than 5% of the Photofrin from the 2-HEMA/EGDMA/BPO layer was released over the 24-h period. Cell viability decreased linearly with increasing Photofrin concentrations, and ROS generation and apoptosis were shown to increase significantly with increasing Photofrin concentrations, until the concentration of Photofrin reached a saturation point of 1.5 µg/ml. This new, multiple-layered, PDT-based stent with dual-release mechanisms is a promising treatment for CCA and cancer-related ductal stenosis.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/drug therapy , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Photochemotherapy/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Apoptosis/drug effects , Bile Duct Neoplasms/metabolism , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cholangiocarcinoma/metabolism , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Liberation , Drug-Eluting Stents , Humans , Methacrylates/chemistry , Photochemotherapy/instrumentation , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Polyvinyls/chemistry , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism
3.
J Biomed Opt ; 21(8): 88002, 2016 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27552311

ABSTRACT

Although photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established modality for cancer treatment, current dosimetric quantities, such as light fluence and PDT dose, do not account for the differences in PDT oxygen consumption for different fluence rates ( ? ). A macroscopic model was adopted to evaluate using calculated reacted singlet oxygen concentration ( [ O 2 1 ] rx ) to predict Photofrin-PDT outcome in mice bearing radiation-induced fibrosarcoma tumors, as singlet oxygen is the primary cytotoxic species responsible for cell death in type II PDT. Using a combination of fluences (50, 135, 200, and 250 ?? J / cm 2 ) and ? (50, 75, and 150 ?? mW / cm 2 ), tumor regrowth rate, k , was determined for each condition. A tumor cure index, CI = 1 ? k / k control , was calculated based on the k between PDT-treated groups and that of the control, Available on the SPIE Digital Library.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents , Radiation Dosage , Singlet Oxygen/analysis , Animals , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/therapeutic use , Female , Mice , Mice, Inbred C3H , Models, Biological , Neoplasms, Experimental/chemistry , Neoplasms, Experimental/metabolism , Neoplasms, Experimental/radiotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Singlet Oxygen/metabolism , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
4.
J Control Release ; 167(3): 315-21, 2013 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23454112

ABSTRACT

Photofrin® (porfimer sodium) is a photosensitive reagent used for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of tumors and dysplasias. Because only photo-irradiated sites are damaged, PDT is less invasive than systemic treatments. However, a photosensitive reaction is a major side effect of systemically delivered Photofrin. To enhance localization of Photofrin to tumors, we have formulated Photofrin with the tumor-localizing graft copolymer poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted poly(l-lysine), PLL-g-PEG. We demonstrate that Photofrin preferentially interacts with PLL-g-PEG through both ionic and hydrophobic interactions. The serum competitive study showed that the highly PEG-grafted PLL is better for preventing serum binding to the Photofrin/PLL-g-PEG complex. In tumor-bearing mice, formulation of Photofrin with PLL-g-PEG enhanced tumor localization of Photofrin as twice as Photofrin alone and concomitantly suppressed the photosensitivity reaction drastically.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polylysine/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Blood Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/chemistry , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Light , Liver/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Polylysine/chemistry , Protein Binding
5.
Lasers Surg Med ; 43(7): 591-9, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22057486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: PDT induces apoptosis, inflammatory reactions, immune reactions, and damage to the microvasculature around the tumors. The mechanisms responsible for the anticancer effects of Photofrin-PDT and NPe6-PDT differ somewhat. To select a photosensitizer for lung cancer treatment and to improve the efficacy of PDT, the mechanisms of action for PDT using Photofrin or NPe6 must be elucidated and the phenomena validated by analyzing molecular determinants from clinical samples. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the role of immunological reactions in the anti-tumor effects of PDT using cytokine-overexpressing cells and investigated whether the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 may be a molecular target. Moreover, we investigated the association between ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins such as breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP), which can pump out some types of photosensitizer, and the efficacy of PDT using clinical samples from 81 early lung cancer lesions treated with PDT between 1998 and 2006 at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital. RESULTS: Photofrin-PDT damaged Bcl-2 and rapidly induced apoptosis, but NPe6-PDT did not damage Bc-2 nor did it induce morphologically typical apoptosis. However, NPe6-PDT exerted a strong anti-tumor effect, regardless of the overexpression of Bcl-2. By analyzing the BCRP-overexpressing cells, Photofrin, but not NPe6, was found to be a substrate of BCRP. All 81 lung cancer lesions were BCRP-positive; as Photofrin was found to be a substrate of BCRP, the expression of BCRP significantly affected the efficacy of Photofrin-PDT. However, NPe6-PDT exerted a strong antitumor effect regardless of BCRP expression, and the complete response rate after NPe6-PDT was much higher than that after Photofrin-PDT. CONCLUSIONS: Our translational research suggests that NPe6-PDT may be superior to Photofrin-PDT for the treatment of lung caner, and individualized approaches to PDT based on the expression status of Bcl-2 and/or BCRP may improve the efficacy of PDT in patients with lung cancers.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/drug effects , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Porphyrins/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/drug effects , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2 , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/metabolism , Animals , Breast Neoplasms , Cell Line, Tumor , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hypoxia/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Microvessels/drug effects , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Porphyrins/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism , Retrospective Studies
6.
Lasers Surg Med ; 43(7): 676-85, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22057495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an anticancer modality approved for the treatment of early disease and palliation of late stage disease. PDT of tumors results in the generation of an acute inflammatory response. The extent and duration of the inflammatory response is dependent upon the PDT regimen employed and is characterized by rapid induction of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, and activation and mobilization of innate immune cells. The importance of innate immune cells in long-term PDT control of tumor growth has been well defined. In contrast the role of IL-6 in long-term tumor control by PDT is unclear. Previous studies have shown that IL-6 can diminish or have no effect on PDT antitumor efficacy. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the current study we used mice deficient for IL-6, Il6(-/-) , to examine the role of IL-6 in activation of antitumor immunity and PDT efficacy by PDT regimens known to enhance antitumor immunity. RESULTS: Our studies have shown that elimination of IL-6 had no effect on innate cell mobilization into the treated tumor bed or tumor draining lymph node (TDLN) and did not affect primary antitumor T-cell activation by PDT. However, IL-6 does appear to negatively regulate the generation of antitumor immune memory and PDT efficacy against murine colon and mammary carcinoma models. The inhibition of PDT efficacy by IL-6 appears also to be related to regulation of Bax protein expression. Increased apoptosis was observed following treatment of tumors in Il6(-/-) mice 24 hours following PDT. CONCLUSIONS: The development of PDT regimens that enhance antitumor immunity has led to proposals for the use of PDT as an adjuvant treatment. However, our results show that the potential for PDT induced expression of IL-6 to enhance tumor survival following PDT must be considered.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/immunology , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/immunology , Chlorophyll/analogs & derivatives , Chlorophyll/immunology , Chlorophyll/pharmacokinetics , Chlorophyll/pharmacology , Colonic Neoplasms/immunology , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/immunology , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacology , Female , Lymphocyte Activation/drug effects , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Neutrophils/drug effects , Photosensitizing Agents/immunology , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , bcl-2-Associated X Protein/metabolism
7.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 32(6): 821-7, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20629974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Porfimer is an intravenous (i.v.) injectable photosensitizing agent used in the photodynamic treatment of tumours and of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus. AIM: To assess the pharmacokinetics as well as the safety profiles of porfimer after a first and a second dose administered 30-45 days apart in patients undergoing photodynamic therapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients (16 with cholangiocarcinoma) were enrolled. Porfimer sodium was administered by i.v. injection over 3-5 min. Blood samples were collected prior to starting i.v. drug injection and postdose at different time points after the first and second administrations. RESULTS: Porfimer exposure values after the second administration were statistically higher than those observed after the first administration, suggesting a slight accumulation of porfimer following repeated administration. The apparent mean elimination half-life of porfimer increased from 410 h after the first administration to 725 h after the second administration. The safety profiles of porfimer after a first and a second administration were similar and did not raise additional concern. Eight patients experienced nine serious adverse events. Only photosensitivity was deemed study-drug related. CONCLUSION: Porfimer appears to display a safe and tolerable profile when used in patients requiring a second photodynamic therapy within 45 days.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Barrett Esophagus/drug therapy , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/administration & dosage , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Photosensitizing Agents/adverse effects , Statistics as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Ai Zheng ; 28(12): 1248-54, 2009 Dec.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19958617

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The mechanism of tumor tissues selectively uptake the photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy (PDT) is still unclear. This study was to investigate the affinity of tumor cells to the photosensitizer photofrin-II. METHODS: Ultraviolet spectrophotometer was applied to measure the absorption spectra of various cell culture media. The fluorescence spectrum of photofrin-II was determined by spectrofluorometer. The absorption and elimination condition of photofrin-II were detected in immortalized human esophageal epithelial cell line SHEE and its malignant transformation cell line SHEEC. RESULTS: The maximum excitation wavelength of fluorescence for photofrin-II was (395.0+/-0.5) nm, and the maximum emission wavelength of that was (634.1+/-0.5) nm. The laser at the wavelength of 630 nm used in this experiment could permeate various types of cell culture media. There was no significant difference in the absorption and elimination of photofrin-II between SHEE and SHEEC at the same concentration and time. The absorption of photofrin-II in SHEE and SHEEC increased with the increase in photofrin-II concentration and duration, and reached the platform at the concentration of 30 microg/mL and a time point of 150 min, respectively. The photofrin-II contents of SHEE and SHEEC showed a slight change after 15-30 min, and diminished rapidly after 30 min. CONCLUSION: High photosensitizer concentration in tumor tissues may be not correlated with the affinity of tumor cells.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophagus/cytology , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
9.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 25(5): 259-63, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19747245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-invasive cancer therapy that has a strong antitumor effect with intravenous administration of Photofrin. However, Photofrin causes light hypersensitivity that impairs the quality of life (QOL) of patients, and thus an improved method of administration is needed. Here, we report the antitumor effect of local administration of Photofrin in combination with a vasodilator, lidocaine hydrochloride. METHOD: The antitumor effect was investigated in nude mice transplanted with HeLa cells. An incision was made near the tumor and Photofrin dissolved in lidocaine jelly was applied directly to the tumor. The tumor was irradiated at 100 J/cm(2) with a yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG)-dye laser (630 nm) at 2 h after the direct application and the tumor volume was measured for 30 days after PDT to investigate the antitumor effect. In some mice, the tumor was excised 24 h after PDT and the depth of necrosis was measured in the excised specimen. RESULT: The tumor was mostly necrotized by PDT following direct application of 10 mg/ml Photofrin dissolved in lidocaine jelly and the effect was greater than with direct application of Photofrin alone. The increase in tumor volume observed in control mice was significantly inhibited in mice that received PDT after direct application of Photofrin in lidocaine jelly. CONCLUSION: PDT using direct application of Photofrin in lidocaine jelly has a strong antitumor effect in mice and this approach may avoid the adverse effects of systemic Photofrin administration.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/therapeutic use , Lidocaine , Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Animals , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/chemistry , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasms, Experimental/pathology , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Solubility , Treatment Outcome
10.
Photochem Photobiol ; 83(5): 1220-5, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17880518

ABSTRACT

Airway stenosis in childhood is resistant to conventional treatments. Endoscope-assisted photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a potent candidate for the therapeutic modality owing to the easy approach to the tracheal lesion and low degree of invasiveness. The aim of the present study was to examine whether a photosensitizer preferentially accumulates in the lesion of airway stenosis in order to explore the possible applicability of PDT. The tracheal mucosa of rabbits was scraped off, and the rabbits were intravenously administered with Photofrin. The tissue concentration of Photofrin was quantitatively measured by fluorometric analysis. Granulation formation was seen in the mucosa-deprived lesion, causing airway stenosis. Photofrin concentration in the granulation tissue was four-fold higher than that in the intact trachea and 10-fold higher than that in the liver, spleen, skin and muscle. Photofrin preferentially accumulated in the lesion of airway stenosis. A preliminary experiment on PDT using transtracheal illumination showed an amelioration of airway stenosis, resulting in reduction in respiratory stridor.


Subject(s)
Constriction, Pathologic/metabolism , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Disease Models, Animal , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Trachea/metabolism , Animals , Male , Rabbits , Tissue Distribution , Trachea/pathology
12.
Clin Cancer Res ; 12(18): 5464-70, 2006 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17000681

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of Photofrin-mediated i.p. photodynamic therapy shown in a previous report limited efficacy and significant acute, but not chronic, toxicity. A secondary aim of this trial and the subject of this report is to determine Photofrin uptake in tumor and normal tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received Photofrin, 2.5 mg/kg, i.v., 48 hours before debulking surgery. Photofrin uptake was measured by spectroflurometric analysis of drug extracted from tumor and normal tissues removed at surgery. Differences in drug uptake among these tissues were statistically considered using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Photofrin concentration was measured in 301 samples collected from 58 of 100 patients enrolled on the trial. In normal tissues, drug uptake significantly (P<0.0001) differed as a function of seven different tissue types. In the toxicity-limiting tissue of intestine, the model-based mean (SE) Photofrin level was 2.70 ng/mg (0.32 ng/mg) and 3.42 ng/mg (0.24 ng/mg) in full-thickness large and small intestine, respectively. In tumors, drug uptake significantly (P=0.0015) differed as a function of patient cohort: model-based mean Photofrin level was 3.32 to 5.31 ng/mg among patients with ovarian, gastric, or small bowel cancer; 2.09 to 2.45 ng/mg among patients with sarcoma and appendiceal or colon cancer; and 0.93 ng/mg in patients with pseudomyxoma. Ovarian, gastric, and small bowel cancers showed significantly higher Photofrin uptake than full-thickness large and/or small intestine. However, the ratio of mean drug level in tumor versus intestine was modest (

Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Photochemotherapy/methods , Biopsy , Cohort Studies , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/administration & dosage , Female , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Models, Biological , Organ Specificity , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Tissue Distribution
13.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 45(9): 923-30, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16928153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Porfimer sodium is an agent used for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer and other pre-malignant conditions such as high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus. Since it is activated by non-thermal red light after a 2-day time interval to allow distribution in the target tissues, its pharmacokinetic properties are relevant to the timing of light treatment and to the period of protection against photosensitivity reactions. With the recent availability of a reliable assay overcoming the limitations of previous assays, two definitive pharmacokinetic studies were undertaken. OBJECTIVE: To determine if sex or a target disease state (cancer) have an effect on porfimer sodium pharmacokinetic parameters. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 men and 12 women) and five male patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing palliative PDT for their obstructive lesions were enrolled. All received an intravenous injection of porfimer sodium (Photofrin) 2 mg/kg over 3-5 minutes and underwent serial blood samplings over 35 days postdose. Porfimer sodium was quantified in serum by a validated spectrofluorometry assay and low-level pre-existing interference was subtracted from postdose concentrations. RESULTS: The two sexes had comparable maximum serum concentrations with a ratio of 0.95. Women tended to have higher areas under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time, and from time zero to infinity than men, but the difference did not reach significance (ratios of means of 1.18 and 1.20, respectively). Elimination parameters also showed no sex-related differences with a mean distribution half-life of 9.5 hours, clearance of 0.88 mL/h/kg and a terminal elimination half-life of 415 hours (17.3 days). The sexes only differed significantly for the time to reach maximum serum concentration (means of 1.54 and 0.165 hours, for women and men, respectively; p = 0.0239). This is probably because of the sparse sampling schedule and the plateau behaviour of the initial concentrations. The pharmacokinetic parameters in cancer patients were generally comparable to healthy volunteers. However, the mean terminal elimination half-life was 30% shorter (283 hours or 11.8 days) in cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Sex does not have an effect on porfimer sodium pharmacokinetics. The presence of advanced oesophageal cancer does not seem to have any influence either. These findings confirm that there is no need for sex-specific label recommendations. Also, the elimination phase of porfimer sodium starting progressively from 24 hours postdose supports the recommended time interval for laser light application, the window for PDT debridement and the skin protection period of at least 30 days.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Sex Factors
14.
Lasers Surg Med ; 38(5): 439-44, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16634075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses a photosensitizer activated by light, in an oxygen-rich environment, to destroy malignant tumors. Clinical trials of PDT at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) use the photosensitizers Photofrin, Photochlor, and 5-ALA-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). In some studies the concentrations of photosensitizer in blood, and occasionally in tumor tissue, were obtained. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from these individual studies were pooled and analyzed. This is the first published review to compare head-to-head the PK of Photofrin and Photochlor. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood and tissue specimens were obtained from patients undergoing PDT at RPCI. Concentrations of Photofrin, Photochlor, and PpIX were measured using fluorescence analysis. A non-linear mixed effects modeling approach was used to analyze the PK data for Photochlor (up to 4 days post-infusion; two-compartment model) and a simpler multipatient-data-pooling approach was used to model PK data for both Photofrin and Photochlor (at least 150 days post-infusion; three-compartment models). Physiological parameters were standardized to correspond to a standard (70 kg; 1.818 m2 surface area) man to facilitate comparisons between Photofrin and Photochlor. RESULTS: Serum concentration-time profiles obtained for Photofrin and Photochlor showed long circulating half-lives, where both sensitizers could be found more than 3 months after intravenous infusion; however, estimated plasma clearances (standard man) were markedly smaller for Photofrin (25.8 ml/hour) than for Photochlor (84.2 ml/hour). Volumes of distribution of the central compartment (standard man) for both Photofrin and Photochlor were about the size (3.14 L, 4.29 L, respectively) of plasma volume, implying that both photosensitizers are almost 100% bound to serum components. Circulating levels of PpIX were generally quite low, falling below the level of instrument sensitivity within a few days after topical application of 5-ALA. CONCLUSION: We have modeled the PK of Photochlor and Photofrin. PK parameter estimates may, in part, explain the relatively long skin photosensitivity attributed to Photofrin but not Photochlor. Due to the potential impact and limited experimental PK data in the PDT field further clinical studies of photosensitizer kinetics in tumor and normal tissues are warranted.


Subject(s)
Aminolevulinic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Topical , Aminolevulinic Acid/analysis , Chlorophyll/analogs & derivatives , Chlorophyll/pharmacokinetics , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/analysis , Fluorometry , Half-Life , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Neoplasms/chemistry , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Photosensitizing Agents/analysis
15.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 42(2): 142-6, 2006.
Article in Lithuanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16528131

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to investigate the accumulation of photosensitizer Photofrin II in the different organs as well as the placenta and embryos of pregnant rats and to determine during which stage of embryogenesis the photosensitizer is accumulated the most effectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experiments were carried out on 25 fetuses from 10 Wistar rats (weight 160-240 g). Female rats were mated with male rats in the evening. Vaginal smears were collected from each female rat next morning and were examined by microscope in order to determine the presence of sperm. The day when sperm was detected in the vagina was considered to be pregnancy day 0. Photofrin II (a dose of 5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously to pregnant rats on days 7, 14, 16, 18 and 20 of embryogenesis. Rats were euthanized 24 hours after intravenous injection of Photofrin II and the following organs were taken: brain, spleen, liver, kidneys, lungs, uterus, placenta, and embryos. The accumulation of the photosensitizer was observed in the samples prepared from these parts of body. Fluorescence measurements ex vivo were performed with an S2000-FI fluorescence spectrometer (Ocean Optics Inc., Florida, USA) by exciting the samples with a blue light emitting diode (lambda=400 nm). RESULTS: A comparative study of fluorescence spectra on days 7, 14, 16, 18 and 20 of embryogenesis showed that the most intense accumulation of Photofrin II in the embryo was on day 7, while on the other days of embryogenesis the accumulation of Photofrin II increased obviously in the uterus and placenta. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained data show that the accumulation of Photofrin II in the embryo depended on the stage of embryogenesis as well as on permeability of the placental barrier. Further photodynamic therapy studies are necessary to determine the total effect of Photofrin II on the embryo.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Embryo, Mammalian/metabolism , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Embryonic Development , Female , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Placenta/metabolism , Pregnancy , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , Time Factors
16.
Photochem Photobiol ; 81(6): 1460-8, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15960591

ABSTRACT

We present a quantitative framework to model a Type II photodynamic therapy (PDT) process in the time domain in which a set of rate equations are solved to describe molecular reactions. Calculation of steady-state light distributions using a Monte Carlo method in a heterogeneous tissue phantom model demonstrates that the photon density differs significantly in a superficial tumor of only 3 mm thickness. The time dependences of the photosensitizer, oxygen and intracellular unoxidized receptor concentrations were obtained and monotonic decreases in the concentrations of the ground-state photosensitizer and receptor were observed. By defining respective decay times, we quantitatively studied the effects of photon density, drug dose and oxygen concentration on photobleaching and cytotoxicity of a photofrin-mediated PDT process. Comparison of the dependences of the receptor decay time on photon density and drug dose at different concentrations of oxygen clearly shows an oxygen threshold under which the receptor concentration remains constant or PDT exhibits no cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the dependence of the photosensitizer and receptor decay times on the drug dose and photon density suggests the possibility of PDT improvement by maximizing cytotoxicity in a tumor with optimized light and drug doses. We also discuss the utility of this model toward the understanding of clinical PDT treatment of chest wall recurrence of breast carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/radiation effects , Hematoporphyrin Photoradiation/instrumentation , Models, Biological , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phantoms, Imaging , Photosensitizing Agents/radiation effects , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/chemistry , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Hematoporphyrin Photoradiation/methods , Light , Monte Carlo Method , Neoplasms/metabolism , Oxygen/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics
17.
Phys Med Biol ; 50(11): 2597-616, 2005 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15901957

ABSTRACT

A singlet oxygen dose model is developed for PDT with Photofrin. The model is based on photosensitizer photobleaching kinetics, and incorporates both singlet oxygen and non-singlet oxygen mediated bleaching mechanisms. To test our model, in vitro experiments were performed in which MatLyLu (MLL) cells were incubated in Photofrin and then irradiated with 532 nm light. Photofrin fluorescence was monitored during treatment and, at selected fluence levels, cell viability was determined using a colony formation assay. Cell survival correlated well to calculated singlet oxygen dose, independent of initial Photofrin concentration or oxygenation. About 2 x 10(8) molecules of singlet oxygen per cell were required to reduce the surviving fraction by 1/e. Analysis of the photobleaching kinetics suggests that the lifetime of singlet oxygen in cells is 0.048 +/- 0.005 micros. The generation of fluorescent photoproducts was not a result of singlet oxygen reactions exclusively, and therefore did not yield additional information to aid in quantifying singlet oxygen dose.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Photobleaching , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Singlet Oxygen/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma , Algorithms , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Light , Male , Oxygen Consumption , Prostatic Neoplasms , Rats
18.
J Biomed Opt ; 10(1): 14004, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15847585

ABSTRACT

We evaluate Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) in a phase 2 clinical trial as an adjuvant to surgery to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis. We extract tissue optical [reduced scattering (mu(s)'), absorption (mu(a)), and attenuation coefficients (mu(eff))] and physiological [blood oxygen saturation (%S(t)O2), total hemoglobin concentration (THC), and photosensitizer concentration (c(Photofrin))] properties in 12 patients using a diffuse reflectance instrument and algorithms based on the diffusion equation. Before PDT, in normal intraperitoneal tissues %S(t)O2 and THC ranged between 32 to 100% and 19 to 263 microM, respectively; corresponding data from tumor tissues ranged between 11 to 44% and 61 to 224 microM. Tumor %S(t)O2 is significantly lower than oxygenation of normal intraperitoneal tissues in the same patients. The mean (+/-standard error of mean) penetration depth (delta) in millimeters at 630 nm is 4.8(+/-0.6) for small bowel, 5.2 (+/-0.67) for large bowel, 3.39(+/-0.29) for peritoneum, 5.19(+/-1.4) for skin, 1.0(+/-0.1) for liver, and 3.02(+/-0.66) for tumor. c(Photofrin) in micromolars is 4.9(+/-2.3) for small bowel, 4.8(+/-2.3) for large bowel, 3.0 (+/-1.0) for peritoneum, 2.5(+/-0.9) for skin, and 7.4(+/-2.8) for tumor. In all tissues examined, mean c(Photofrin) tends to decrease after PDT, perhaps due to photobleaching. These results provide benchmark in-vivo tissue optical property data, and demonstrate the feasibility of in-situ measurements during clinical PDT treatments.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Hematoporphyrin Photoradiation , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Light , Oxygen/blood , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneum/metabolism , Algorithms , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/therapeutic use , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Liver/metabolism , Osmolar Concentration , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Scattering, Radiation , Skin/metabolism , Tissue Distribution
19.
Phys Med Biol ; 49(21): 4837-60, 2004 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15584523

ABSTRACT

We present a detailed investigation of Photofrin photobleaching and photoproduct accumulation. Fisher rats were sensitized with 10 mg kg(-1) Photofrin and irradiated 24 h later with 514 nm light at 5 or 100 mW cm(-2). Fluorescence spectra were collected from the skin throughout treatment, and sensitizer bleaching and fluorescent photoproduct formation were quantified using spectral analysis. Photofrin bleaching was slightly more rapid at the higher irradiance under these conditions. However, accumulation of photoproduct was significantly enhanced at lower irradiance. To interpret these unexpected findings, we developed a new mathematical model in which reactions between singlet oxygen (1O2) and the photosensitizer and reactions between the sensitizer triplet and biological targets are both allowed to contribute to bleaching. Predictions of this model were tested in experiments performed on EMT6 spheroids sensitized with concentrations of 2.5, 10 and 30 microg mL(-1) Photofrin and subjected to PDT. Photofrin bleaching and photoproduct formation in these spheroids were measured using confocal fluorescence spectroscopy. In qualitative agreement with the mixed-mechanism model predictions, at the highest drug concentration Photofrin bleaching was more efficient via 1O2 reactions, while at the lowest concentration triplet reactions were more efficient. At all concentrations, photoproduct accumulation was greater under conditions of abundant oxygen.


Subject(s)
Dihematoporphyrin Ether/administration & dosage , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Hematoporphyrin Photoradiation/methods , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/metabolism , Photobleaching/drug effects , Photobleaching/radiation effects , Radiation Tolerance/drug effects , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Kinetics , Light , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344 , Spheroids, Cellular/drug effects , Spheroids, Cellular/radiation effects
20.
Cancer Sci ; 95(9): 765-9, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15471564

ABSTRACT

The sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of porfimer sodium (PF) was evaluated on a chemically induced mammary tumor in Sprague-Dawley rats. The timing of 24 h after the administration of PF was chosen for the ultrasonic exposure, based on pharmacokinetic analysis of the PF concentrations in the tumor, plasma, skin and muscle. At a PF dose not less than 2.5 mg/kg and at a free-field ultrasonic intensity not less than 3 W/cm2, the synergistic effect between PF administration and ultrasonic exposure on the tumor growth inhibition was significant. The ultrasonic intensity showed a relatively sharp threshold for the synergistic antitumor effect, which is typical of an ultrasonic effect mediated by acoustic cavitation. These results suggest that PF is a potentially useful as a sonosensitizer for sonodynamic treatment of chemically induced tumors.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/pharmacokinetics , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/chemically induced , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/therapy , Ultrasonic Therapy , 9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene/toxicity , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinogens/toxicity , Combined Modality Therapy , Dihematoporphyrin Ether/therapeutic use , Female , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tissue Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL