Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Gastroenterology ; 158(6): 1789-1810.e15, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359563

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus. Many new studies have been reported recently that describe EoE management. An expert panel was convened by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute and the Joint Task Force on Allergy-Immunology Practice Parameters to provide a technical review to be used as the basis for an updated clinical guideline. This technical review was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Eighteen focused EoE management questions were considered, with 15 answered using the GRADE framework and 3 with a narrative summary. There is moderate certainty in the evidence that topical glucocorticosteroids effectively reduce esophageal eosinophil counts to <15 per high-power field over a short-term treatment period of 4-12 weeks, but very low certainty about the effects of using topical glucocorticosteroids as maintenance therapy. Multiple dietary strategies may be effective in reducing esophageal eosinophil counts to <15 per high-power field over a short-term treatment period, with moderate certainty for elemental diets, low certainty for empiric 2-, 4-, and 6-food elimination diets, and very low certainty that allergy-based testing dietary eliminations have a higher failure rate compared to empiric diet elimination. There is very low certainty for the effect of proton pump inhibitors in patients with esophageal eosinophilia. Although esophageal dilation appears to be relatively safe, there is no evidence that it reduces esophageal eosinophil counts. There is very low certainty in the effects of multiple other medical treatments for EoE: anti-interleukin-5 therapy, anti-interleukin-13 therapy, anti-IgE therapy, montelukast, cromolyn, and anti-TNF therapy.


Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Administration, Topical , Adult , Advisory Committees/standards , Age Factors , Allergy and Immunology/organization & administration , Allergy and Immunology/standards , Child , Dilatation/adverse effects , Dilatation/standards , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophils/drug effects , Eosinophils/immunology , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food, Formulated , Gastroenterology/methods , Gastroenterology/organization & administration , Gastroenterology/standards , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , Treatment Outcome , United States
4.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 8(1): 13-33, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32213062

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the oesophagus characterised by absence of peristalsis and insufficient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. With new advances and developments in achalasia management, there is an increasing demand for comprehensive evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians in achalasia patient care. METHODS: Guidelines were established by a working group of representatives from United European Gastroenterology, European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Recommendations were voted upon using a nominal group technique. RESULTS: These guidelines focus on the definition of achalasia, treatment aims, diagnostic tests, medical, endoscopic and surgical therapy, management of treatment failure, follow-up and oesophageal cancer risk. CONCLUSION: These multidisciplinary guidelines provide a comprehensive evidence-based framework with recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of adult achalasia patients.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Gastroenterology/standards , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/standards , Diagnosis, Differential , Dilatation/standards , Disease Progression , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/standards , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Achalasia/etiology , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/pathology , Europe , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Gastroenterology/methods , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Humans , Manometry/standards , Societies, Medical/standards
5.
Gastroenterology ; 158(4): 840-851, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836530

ABSTRACT

Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis has progressed from elemental formula for children and esophageal dilation for adults to selective exclusion of food triggers and swallowed topical corticosteroids. Management guidelines are available from the American Gastroenterological Association and the Joint Task Force on Allergy Immunology Practice Parameters. We cannot, however, evaluate the efficacy of treatments without a definition of response. We propose a treat-to-target approach, based on symptoms and findings from endoscopy and histology. This approach addresses dissociations between outcomes, such as symptom persistence despite normalization of histologic features and symptom resolution after esophageal dilation despite histologic features of active disease. Eosinophilic esophagitis can now be treated with biologic agents that target specific immune pathways, and findings from prospective trials have indicated that less-restrictive, empiric, elimination diets can be effective and reduce the need for repeated endoscopic assessment of disease activity during food reintroduction. We also discuss eosinophilic esophagitis subtypes, factors associated with disease, and advances in management.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Gastroenterology/methods , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Child , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Deglutition , Dietary Exposure/adverse effects , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/standards , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/etiology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Esophagoscopy , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Esophagus/pathology , Feeding Behavior , Gastroenterology/standards , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Infant , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
6.
Pediatr Transplant ; 23(7): e13551, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31313460

ABSTRACT

To evaluate whether a serial biliary dilation protocol improves outcomes and decreases total biliary drainage time for biliary strictures following pediatric liver transplantation. From 2006 to 2016, 213 orthotopic deceased and living related liver transplants were performed in 199 patients with a median patient age of 3.1 years at a single pediatric hospital. Patients with biliary strictures were managed by IR or surgically by the transplant team. Patients managed by IR were divided into two groups. The first group was managed with a standardized three-session protocol consisting of dilation every two weeks for three dilations. The second group was managed clinically with varying number and interval of dilations as determined by a multidisciplinary team. The location of biliary stricture, duration of drainage, number of balloon dilations, balloon diameter, time interval between dilations, and success of percutaneous treatment were recorded. Thirty-four patients developed biliary strictures. Thirty-one patients were managed with percutaneous intervention. Three strictures could not be crossed and were converted to operative management. Ten patients were managed in the three-session protocol, and 18 patients were managed in the clinically treated group. There was no significant difference in clinical success rates between groups, 80% and 61%, respectively. The three-session protocol group trended toward a lower total biliary drain indwell time (median 49 days) compared with the clinically treated group (median 89 days), P = .089. Our study suggests that a three-session dilation protocol following transplant-related biliary stricture may decrease total biliary drainage time for some patients.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract/physiopathology , Constriction, Pathologic , Dilatation/methods , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Adolescent , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures , Catheterization/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Cholestasis/etiology , Dilatation/standards , Drainage , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 31(9)2018 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30169645

ABSTRACT

Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Achalasia/therapy , Adult , Botulinum Toxins/therapeutic use , Child , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/standards , Disease Management , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Male , Myotomy/methods , Myotomy/standards , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/standards
8.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 48(3): 347-357, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29920726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibrotic stricture is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) affecting approximately half of all patients. No specific anti-fibrotic therapies are available; however, several therapies are currently under evaluation. Drug development for the indication of stricturing CD is hampered by a lack of standardised definitions, diagnostic modalities, clinical trial eligibility criteria, endpoints and treatment targets in stricturing CD. AIM: To standardise definitions, diagnosis and treatment targets for anti-fibrotic stricture therapies in Chron's disease. METHODS: An interdisciplinary expert panel consisting of 15 gastroenterologists and radiologists was assembled. Using modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology, 109 candidate items derived from systematic review and expert opinion focusing on small intestinal strictures were anonymously rated as inappropriate, uncertain or appropriate. Survey results were discussed as a group before a second and third round of voting. RESULTS: Fibrotic strictures are defined by the combination of luminal narrowing, wall thickening and pre-stenotic dilation. Definitions of anastomotic (at site of prior intestinal resection with anastomosis) and naïve small bowel strictures were similar; however, there was uncertainty regarding wall thickness in anastomotic strictures. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the optimal technique to define fibrotic strictures and assess response to therapy. Symptomatic strictures are defined by abdominal distension, cramping, dietary restrictions, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and post-prandial abdominal pain. Need for intervention (endoscopic balloon dilation or surgery) within 24-48 weeks is considered the appropriate endpoint in pharmacological trials. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus criteria for diagnosis and response to therapy in stricturing Crohn's disease should inform both clinical practice and trial design.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Crohn Disease/therapy , Expert Testimony , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Intestinal Obstruction/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Catheterization/methods , Catheterization/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Colon/pathology , Colon/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/diagnosis , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Constriction, Pathologic/therapy , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/standards , Endoscopy , Fibrosis/diagnosis , Fibrosis/etiology , Fibrosis/therapy , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/classification , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestine, Small/pathology , Intestine, Small/surgery , Reference Standards
9.
Dig Endosc ; 30(3): 293-309, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29411902

ABSTRACT

The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed the 'EPLBD Clinical Practice Guidelines' as fundamental guidelines based on new scientific techniques. EPLBD is a treatment method that has recently become widely used for choledocolithiasis. The evidence level in this field is usually low, and in many instances, the recommendation grading has to be determined on the basis of expert consensus. At this point, the guidelines are divided into the following six sections according to the 'EST Clinical Practice Guidelines': (i) Indications, (ii) procedures, (iii) special cases, (iv) procedure-related adverse events, (v) treatment outcomes, and (vi) postoperative follow up observation.


Subject(s)
Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Dilatation/standards , Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/standards , Clinical Protocols , Gastroenterology , Humans , Japan , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical
10.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 15(5): 567-582, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28669043

ABSTRACT

The XprESS multi-sinus dilation system (XprESS) is a minimally invasive alternative to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) used in the treatment of people with chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis refractory to medical treatment. The manufacturer of XprESS, Entellus Medical, claims the technology is as effective as FESS in improving quality of life and is associated with quicker recovery times and reduced costs. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected XprESS for evaluation. Nine trials published in 13 papers were correctly identified by the company as relevant to the decision problem, including one randomised controlled trial (REMODEL study). From this evidence, the company concluded that XprESS is as beneficial as FESS for a range of clinical endpoints. The External Assessment Centre (EAC) agreed with the company's conclusion in a subgroup of patients, but judged that the evidence did not generalise to patients within the NHS fully. The company constructed a de novo costing model. XprESS generated cost-savings of £1302 per patient compared with FESS. The EAC critiqued and updated the model's inputs, with differences in results driven by changes in assumptions on procedure duration, length of hospital stay and the proportion of procedures undertaken in an outpatient setting under local anaesthetic. Although cost-incurring in the base case, XprESS generated cost savings under certain scenarios. The MTAC reviewed the evidence and supported the case for adoption, issuing positive draft recommendations. After public consultation NICE published this as Medical Technologies Guidance 30.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Dilatation/instrumentation , Dilatation/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Sinusitis/economics , Sinusitis/therapy , State Medicine/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics
11.
Intern Emerg Med ; 12(6): 877-885, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28593450

ABSTRACT

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Flow-mediated (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilatation (NMD) are considered non-invasive methods to assess endothelial function and surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression to evaluate the impact of COPD on FMD and NMD. Studies were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE databases. The random-effect method was used to take into account the variability among included studies. A total of eight studies were included in the final analysis, eight with data on FMD (334 COPD patients) and two on NMD (104 COPD patients). Compared to controls, COPD patients show a significantly lower FMD (MD -3.15%; 95% CI -4.89, -1.40; P < 0.001) and NMD (MD -3.53%; 95% CI -7.04, -0.02; P = 0.049). Sensitivity analyses substantially confirms the results. Meta-regression models show that a more severe degree of airway obstruction is associated with a more severe FMD impairment in COPD patients than in controls. Regression analyses confirm that the association between COPD and endothelial dysfunction is independent of baseline smoking status and most traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, COPD is significantly and independently associated with endothelial dysfunction. These findings may be useful to plan adequate cardiovascular prevention strategies in this clinical setting, with particular regard to patients with a more severe disease.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/standards , Endothelium/physiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Endothelium/physiopathology , Humans , Logistic Models , Risk Factors
12.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 85(2): 332-337.e1, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although the rule of 3 is recommended to minimize the risk of perforation when esophageal dilation is performed using bougie dilators, there are no data to validate its use. Our aim was to investigate the association between the rule of 3 and adverse events (AEs) in esophageal dilation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review in patients who underwent esophageal bougie or balloon dilation between December 1991 and February 2013 at a tertiary hospital was performed. Data collection included patient demographics, stricture and procedural characteristics, AEs, and follow-up. Univariate logistic regression models were used to assess the risk of AEs and perforations. RESULTS: A total of 297 patients (median age, 63 years; 60% men) underwent 2216 esophageal bougie or balloon dilations. Major AEs occurred in 22 (1%) dilation sessions, including 11 (0.5%) perforations, 4 (0.2%) fistulas, 3 (0.1%) hospitalizations for pain management, 2 (0.09%) clinically significant hemorrhages, 1 (0.04%) fever, and 1 (0.04%) tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis leak. Mean duration of treatment was 43.2 months (standard deviation, 47.7 months). Most strictures were benign (n = 275; 93%) and complex in nature (n = 198; 67%). Non-adherence to the rule of 3 occurred in 190 (13%) dilations with bougie dilators. Non-adherence was not associated with a higher rate of major AEs (1/190, 0.5% vs 15/953, 1.6%; P = .18) and perforations (0/190, 0% vs 7/952, 0.7%; P = .18). Gender, complex strictures, location of the stricture, type of dilator, and additional interventions were also not associated with major AEs or perforations. However, malignant strictures were associated with an increased risk of major AEs (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-12.0) and perforations (odds ratio, 8.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-31.9). CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence to the rule of 3 does not appear to increase the risk of AEs, particularly perforation, after esophageal dilation using bougie dilators. Caution is needed with the dilation of malignant strictures, as there is an increased risk of perforations and AEs. However, large prospective studies are needed to verify the results of this study.


Subject(s)
Dilatation/standards , Esophageal Stenosis/surgery , Esophagoscopy/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Esophageal Fistula/epidemiology , Esophageal Perforation/epidemiology , Female , Fever/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Larynx, Artificial , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pain Management , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
13.
Can J Surg ; 58(5): 347-8, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26204140

ABSTRACT

Anal strictures with fibrotic induration have been shown to develop in up to 50% of all patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with anal ulceration. We evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and long-term efficacy of bougie dilation for a subgroup of patients with symptomatic Crohn's-related fibrotic anal strictures. Bougie dilation is simple to perform, relatively inexpensive and has a low risk of complications.


Subject(s)
Anus Diseases/therapy , Crohn Disease/complications , Dilatation/instrumentation , Adult , Anus Diseases/etiology , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Constriction, Pathologic/therapy , Dilatation/adverse effects , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/standards , Feasibility Studies , Fibrosis/etiology , Fibrosis/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
14.
Crit Care ; 19: 229, 2015 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25981550

ABSTRACT

Patients in ICUs frequently require tracheostomy for long-term ventilator support, and the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) method is preferred over surgical tracheostomy. The use of ultrasound (US) imaging to guide ICU procedures and interventions has recently emerged as a simple and noninvasive tool. The current evidence regarding the applications of US in PDT is encouraging; however, the exact role of US-guided dilatational tracheostomy (US-PDT) remains poorly defined. In this review, we describe the best available evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of US-PDT and briefly delineate the general principles of US image generation for the airway and of US-PDT procedures.


Subject(s)
Dilatation/standards , Tracheostomy/standards , Tracheotomy/standards , Ultrasonography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards , Dilatation/adverse effects , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheotomy/adverse effects
15.
Dan Med J ; 62(3): C5042, 2015 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25748872

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a common procedure in intensive care. This updated Danish national guideline describes indications, contraindications and complications, and gives recommendations for timing, anaesthesia, and technique, use of fibre bronchoscopy and ultrasound guidance, as well as decannulation strategy, training, and education.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/standards , Critical Care/standards , Dilatation/standards , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Tracheostomy/standards , Anesthesiology/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Bronchoscopy/standards , Contraindications , Critical Care/methods , Critical Illness , Denmark , Dilatation/methods , Humans , Patient Safety , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Societies, Medical , Tracheostomy/methods
16.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(7): 1911-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23417563

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Building upon the findings of a recent qualitative investigation of women's experiences with rehabilitative vaginal dilator use, the primary goal of this article is to outline a set of preliminary clinical care recommendations that health care professionals may draw upon in addressing women's unique experiences with vaginal dilator use including their multifaceted struggles with the procedure, possibly enhancing adherence to this practice. METHODS: Ten women participated in in-depth interviews regarding their experiences with using the dilator as prescribed by their health care providers. Following the analysis of these interviews, members of the interdisciplinary research team met to review and discuss the development of clinical care recommendations stemming from these findings. RESULTS: Eight care recommendations aimed at addressing the concerns expressed by the women interviewed and at improving women's overall experiences with rehabilitative dilator use emerged: (1) introduce the dilator in a light and straightforward manner; (2) enhance dilator accessibility; (3) introduce the vaginal dilator early on in treatment; (4) emphasize health maintenance over intercourse as a benefit of dilator use; (5) explore and acknowledge women's values and views of sexuality; (6) increase awareness and sensitivity to emotional reactions; (7) enhance psychoeducational resources for supporting vaginal dilator use; and (8) ensure consistent institutional practice when introducing the dilator. CONCLUSION: The clinical care recommendations proposed here reflect the various challenges women may encounter when using the vaginal dilator--which vary from practical to, for some, profoundly emotional--and are designed to better position health care providers to help women navigate these challenges.


Subject(s)
Dilatation/instrumentation , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/physiopathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Vagina/physiopathology , Dilatation/standards , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic
17.
Respiration ; 84(2): 123-7, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The steady rise in the number of critically ill patients in the USA has led to an increase in the need for tracheostomies in patients requiring chronic ventilatory support. There is a matched need for experienced operators to safely and efficiently perform these procedures. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects on procedural outcomes and efficiency of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) placement in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) by the surgical team (ST) or interventional pulmonologists (IP). The IP team joined the PDT team in September 2007 and became primarily responsible for all PDT in the MICU. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who received PDT in the MICU by ST and IP from September 2007 to August 2010 was made. Outcomes including safety, efficacy, and procedural efficiency were compared. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients underwent bedside PDT in the MICU during this period. Forty-three procedures (40.2%) were performed by the ST and 64 procedures (59.8%) were performed by IP. There was no statistical difference between the incidence of airway injury and infection between the two procedural groups. There were no deaths related to the performance of PDT in our series. PDT was completed within 48 h of request in 100% of IP patients and 95% of ST patients (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistical differences in PDT between the ST and IP groups when comparing complications. There was a trend towards an increased efficiency in time to PDT after consultation within the IP PDT group. Trained IP can safely and effectively perform PDT.


Subject(s)
Patient Care Team/standards , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pulmonary Medicine , Thoracic Surgery , Tracheostomy , Critical Illness/therapy , Dilatation/adverse effects , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/standards , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Long-Term Care/methods , Patient Safety , Pulmonary Medicine/methods , Pulmonary Medicine/standards , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Thoracic Surgery/methods , Thoracic Surgery/standards , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/methods , Tracheostomy/standards , Treatment Outcome
20.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 88(5): 496-8, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17002859

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Review of the literature reveals little evidence to prove the efficacy of urethral dilatation for adult women with various lower urinary tract complaints. We conducted a postal survey to ascertain the actual practice of urethral dilatation among urologists in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 428 consultant urologists listed as full members of the British Association of Urological Surgeons. The questionnaire consisted of 8 items about urologists' perception of indications, efficacy, and the need for repeated dilatation and anaesthesia. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate was 42%. Although urethral stenosis was the most common indication (97%), the majority of urologists (69%) indicated that fewer than 25% of patients had evidence of stenosis. Overall, 61% of urologists performed dilatation 7 times or more during the last year and 55% believed that less than half of the patients experienced long-term improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of strong evidence to support the use of urethral dilatation in women, many urologists continue to find it a useful tool in approaching women with lower urinary tract complaints.


Subject(s)
Dilatation/standards , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Professional Practice/standards , Urologic Diseases/therapy , Urology/standards , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Consultants , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...