Thermodynamics and kinetics of inhibitor binding to human equilibrative nucleoside transporter subtype-1.

Many nucleoside transport inhibitors are in clinical use as anti-cancer, vasodilator and cardioprotective drugs. However, little is known about the binding energetics of these inhibitors to nucleoside transporters (NTs) due to their low endogenous expression levels and difficulties in the biophysical characterization of purified protein with ligands. Here, we present kinetics and thermodynamic analyses of inhibitor binding to the human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1), also known as SLC29A1. Using a radioligand binding assay, we obtained equilibrium binding and kinetic rate constants of well-known NT inhibitors--[(3)H]nitrobenzylmercaptopurine ribonucleoside ([(3)H]NBMPR), dilazep, and dipyridamole--and the native permeant, adenosine, to hENT1. We observed that the equilibrium binding affinities for all inhibitors decreased whereas, the kinetic rate constants increased with increasing temperature. Furthermore, we found that binding is enthalpy driven and thus, an exothermic reaction, implying that the transporter does not discriminate between its inhibitors and substrates thermodynamically. This predominantly enthalpy-driven binding by four chemically distinct ligands suggests that the transporter may not tolerate diversity in the type of interactions that lead to high affinity binding. Consistent with this, the measured activation energy of [(3)H]NBMPR association was relatively large (20 kcal mol(-1)) suggesting a conformational change upon inhibitor binding. For all three inhibitors the enthalpy (ΔH°) and entropy (ΔS°) contributions to the reaction energetics were determined by van't Hoff analysis to be roughly similar (25-75% ΔG°). Gains in enthalpy with increasing polar surface area of inhibitors suggest that the binding is favored by electrostatic or polar interactions between the ligands and the transporter.

In vivo effectiveness of several nucleoside transport inhibitors in mice and hamsters.

The in vivo nucleoside transport inhibitory effects of 6-[(4-nitrobenzyl)-mercapto]purine ribonucleoside (NBMPR), used as its 5'-monophosphate derivative (NBMPR-P), dilazep, mioflazine and its derivatives soluflazine, R57974 and R75231, were investigated in BALB/c mice. The extent and duration of action were followed by assaying adenosine transport in blood cells sampled at time intervals following i.p. administration (ca. 20 mg/kg). Dilazep and R57974 were found to be short-acting inhibitors, while NBMPR-P and R75231 were similar in their action and caused essentially full inhibition of adenosine transport over a 4- to 5-h period. Mioflazine and soluflazine were rather ineffective, causing only partial inhibition. R75231 was also active after oral administration which, when repeated three times in 4-h intervals, resulted in essentially full transport inhibition up to 20 h following the initial dose. Effects of NBMPR-P, R57974 and dilazep on adenosine transport in blood cells were also measured in blood cells of hamsters after i.p. administration of the same doses. All three drugs caused full transport inhibition, but the action of dilazep and R75231 showed reversal within about 30 min and 2 h, respectively, while NBMPR-P caused full inhibition for at least 3-4 h. These results demonstrate the potential of the mioflazine derivative R75231 to be useful in vivo, possibly even after p.o. administration, for host protection against the actions of cytotoxic nucleosides used in experimental antiparasitic therapy or other studies requiring suppression of nucleoside transport.

Therapeutic tolerance, hemodynamic effects, and oral dose kinetics of dilazep dihydrochloride in hypertensive patients.

The oral dose metabolism of dilazep dihydrochloride [tetrahydro-1H-1,4-diazepine-1,4(5H)-dipropanol 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate] was examined in six hypertensive patients receiving a single oral dose of 600 mg of dilazep (3-3.8 mg/kg BW). Blood was collected at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h after administration of the dose and urine was collected for three time intervals of 0-4 h, 4-10 h, and 10-24 h. Dilazep concentrations in blood and urine were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Dilazep decayed monoexponentially with a mean elimination rate constant of 0.27 +/- 0.13 h-1 and a mean half-life of 3.04 +/- 1.34 h. The mean tmax of absorption was 1.40 +/- 0.82 h. With maximally tolerated chronic doses, the steady-state concentration measured at 1 week was 25.6 ng/mL in a patient receiving 300 mg daily (100 mg TID) for 3 weeks, and dilazep concentration increased with the dose in others for up to a 600-mg dose daily. Dilazep did not produce any significant changes in heart rate and blood pressure after a single oral dose or during chronic dosing. There was no correlation between blood dilazep levels and the changes in heart rate and blood pressure. In three additional patients, oral dilazep dihydrochloride titrated gradually to maximally tolerated doses (900 mg daily) failed to produce significant effects on biochemical and neurohumoral measurements, and hemodynamic parameters as well as ventricular functional indices measured by radionucleide methods. Oral dilazep administration in maximally tolerated doses is devoid of effects on blood pressure and cardiac hemodynamic function.

Intravenous dilazep reduces blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance in humans.

Dilazep, a coronary vasodilating drug with adenosine-mediated activity, was tested (acute double-blind study versus placebo) for its antihypertensive activity in 12 patients who had mild to moderate hypertension. Dilazep (0.2 mg/kg body weight by IV infusion for ten minutes) significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (random-zero sphygmomanometer) on average by 13.3 and 10.6 mm Hg respectively. The antihypertensive effect started rapidly, reached its maximum 20 minutes after administration, and lasted for 90 minutes. Heart rate significantly increased between 10 and 30 minutes. The antihypertensive effect of dilazep was associated with a relevant vasodilating effect as demonstrated by the changes in upper limb blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography, +32%; P less than .001) and vascular resistance (-29%, P less than .001). The maximal reduction of vascular resistance was directly correlated to its baseline value. For these characteristics of action, at least in acute administration, dilazep would be useful agent for the treatment of high blood pressure in mild to moderately hypertensive patients.