Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 93(1): 14-21, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the worldwide spread of antibiotic resistance, delivering antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results in a timely manner represents a major challenge. In cases of sepsis, rapid AST may facilitate early optimization of empiric antibiotic therapy. Disc diffusion is a well-standardized AST method, however 16 to 24 h are required to achieve an overall AST profile according to antimicrobial societies. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, we evaluated the performance of Mueller-Hinton-Rapid-SIR (MHR-SIR) agar after 6-8 h of incubation in comparison with standard MH agar after 16 h of incubation directly on positive blood cultures caused by Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus from routine clinical microbiology. A total of 133 positive blood samples including 110 Enterobacteriaceae (83%) and 23 Staphylococcus aureus (17%) were tested in parallel by two direct AST methods, each using EUCAST breakpoints. For each combination bacterium and antibiotic, we compared the categorical agreement and the correlation between the diameters obtained by MHR-SIR and by standard MH. RESULTS: Our results showed 97.7% categorical agreement for Enterobacteriaceae, with 1.4% minor errors, 0.4% major errors and 0.5% very major errors. For S. aureus, we observed 97.8% categorical agreement, 1.9% minor errors, 0.3% major errors and no very major errors. CONCLUSION: Our results showed excellent categorical agreement and correlations between diameters for MHR-SIR and standard MH methods. MHRSIR can predict the result of overall AST profile within 6-8 h with reliable results. AST is obtained on the same day the blood culture becomes positive, with a very moderate cost.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnosis , Blood Culture/methods , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/diagnosis , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Blood Culture/economics , Blood Culture/standards , Diagnostic Errors , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/economics , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/standards , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Early Diagnosis , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/growth & development , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Humans , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Time Factors
2.
J Microbiol Methods ; 139: 130-134, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28559163

ABSTRACT

Outpatient urine samples are among the most commonly processed in a microbiology laboratory, which involves a high economic burden. The aim of this study was compare cost and efficiency to process uropathogens between MicroScan system (2010-2011) versus a chromogenic medium and the disk diffusion method (2013-2014). In the first period, a total 9918 bacterial populations were isolated from urine samples. Annual estimated costs during 2010 and 2011 for processing were EUR 53,818 and EUR 57,306, respectively (EUR 111,124 total). In the second period, a total 11,728 bacterial isolates were processed, with annual estimated costs of EUR 21,078 and EUR 23,248, respectively (EUR 44,326 total). We included the cost for a laboratory technician (252h worked per year), estimated at EUR 2500 per year. The mean estimated savings were EUR 66,797 (60%).The identification by chromogenic media and antibiotic susceptibility patterns by disk diffusion method was similar to MicroScan in both study periods. Only some isolated Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. were misidentified. The strategy reported here did not affect the quality of the results and yielded substantial cost savings.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/economics , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chromogenic Compounds/chemistry , Chromogenic Compounds/economics , Citrobacter/drug effects , Citrobacter/isolation & purification , Citrobacter/pathogenicity , Cost Savings , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/economics , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterobacter/drug effects , Enterobacter/isolation & purification , Enterobacter/pathogenicity , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Urine/microbiology
3.
J Chemother ; 29(3): 144-149, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27443547

ABSTRACT

This investigation was undertaken to compare phenotypic and molecular methods for detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A total of 245 non-duplicated isolates of P. aeruginosa were collected from hospitalized patients. Disc diffusion method was used to identify carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Three phenotypic methods, including Modified Hodge Test (MHT), Modified Carba NP (MCNP) test and Carbapenem Inactivation Method (CIM) were used for investigation of carbapenemase production. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect carbapenemase encoding genes. Of 245 P. aeruginosa isolates investigated, 121 isolates were carbapenem-resistant. Among carbapenem-resistant isolates, 40, 39 and 35 isolates exhibited positive results using MHT, MCNP test and CIM, respectively. PCR indicated the presence of carbapenemase genes in 35 of carbapenem-resistant isolates. MHT showed low sensitivity and specificity for carbapenemase detection among P. aeruginosa isolates in comparison to PCR. CIM was most affordable and highly specific than MCNP test compared with the molecular method.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Carbapenems/metabolism , Genes, Bacterial , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzymology , beta-Lactam Resistance , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/economics , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Escherichia coli/growth & development , False Positive Reactions , Hospital Costs , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Inactivation, Metabolic , Iran , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/economics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Molecular Typing/economics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/economics , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , beta-Lactamases/genetics
4.
PLoS Biol ; 13(1): e1002044, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25602254

ABSTRACT

We have developed a hands-on experimental module that combines biology experiments with a physics-based analytical model in order to characterize antimicrobial compounds. To understand antibiotic resistance, participants perform a disc diffusion assay to test the antimicrobial activity of different compounds and then apply a diffusion-based analytical model to gain insights into the behavior of the active antimicrobial component. In our experience, this module was robust, reproducible, and cost-effective, suggesting that it could be implemented in diverse settings such as undergraduate research, STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) camps, school programs, and laboratory training workshops. By providing valuable interdisciplinary research experience in science outreach and education initiatives, this module addresses the paucity of structured training or education programs that integrate diverse scientific fields. Its low-cost requirements make it especially suitable for use in resource-limited settings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Microbiology/education , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/economics , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Humans , Microbiology/economics
5.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 8(12): 1281-8, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21877930

ABSTRACT

Data generated using different antimicrobial testing methods often have to be combined, but the equivalence of such results is difficult to assess. Here we compared two commonly used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods, automated microbroth dilution and agar disk diffusion, for 8 common drugs, using 222 Salmonella isolates of serotypes Newport, Typhimurium, and 4,5,12:i-, which had been isolated from clinical salmonellosis cases among cattle and humans. Isolate classification corresponded well between tests, with 95% overall category agreement. Test results were significantly negatively correlated, and Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from -0.98 to -0.38. Using Cox's proportional hazards model we determined that for most drugs, a 1 mm increase in zone diameter resulted in an estimated 20%-40% increase in the hazard of growth inhibition. However, additional parameters such as isolation year or serotype often impacted the hazard of growth inhibition as well. Comparison of economical feasibility showed that agar disk diffusion is clearly more cost-effective if the average sample throughput is small but that both methods are comparable at high sample throughput. In conclusion, for the Salmonella serotypes and antimicrobial drugs analyzed here, antimicrobial susceptibility data generated based on either test are qualitatively very comparable, and the current published break points for both methods are in excellent agreement. Economic feasibility clearly depends on the specific laboratory settings, and disk diffusion might be an attractive alternative for certain applications such as surveillance studies.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/economics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella/drug effects , Animals , Cattle , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/economics , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...