Phenotypic variability and management of patients with mosaic monosomy X and Y chromosome material: a case series.

BACKGROUND: we aim to discuss the origin and the differences of the phenotypic features and the management care of rare form of disorder of sex development due to Mosaic monosomy X and Y chromosome materiel. METHODS: We report our experience with patients harboring mosaic monosomy X and Y chromosome material diagnosed by blood cells karyotypes and cared for in our department from 2005 to 2022. RESULTS: We have included five infants in our study. The current average age was 8 years. In four cases, the diagnosis was still after born and it was at the age of 15 years in one case. Physical examination revealed a variable degree of virilization, ranging from a normal male phallus with unilateral ectopic gonad to ambiguous with a genital tubercle and bilateral not palpable gonads in four cases and normal female external genitalia in patient 5. Karyotype found 45, X/46, XY mosaicism in patient 1 and 2 and 45, X/46, X, der (Y) mosaicism in patient 3, 4 and 5. Three cases were assigned to male gender and two cases were assigned to female. After radiologic and histologic exploration, four patients had been explored by laparoscopy to perform gonadectomy in two cases and Mullerian derivative resection in the other. Urethroplasty was done in two cases of posterior hypospadias. Gender identity was concordant with the sex of assignment at birth in only 3 cases. CONCLUSION: Because of the phenotypic heterogeneity of this sexual disorders and the variability of its management care, then the decision should rely on a multidisciplinary team approach.

Preferences in Clinical Care of Individuals With Differences of Sex Development.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most important attributes related to the process of achieving, and outcomes associated with, successful care for differences of sex development (DSD). METHODS: We developed a best-worst scaling survey administered to 520 DSD stakeholders, including individuals or family members of those with DSD, health care specialists, and patient support and advocacy representatives. Fourteen process-related attributes and 16 outcome-related attributes were identified through qualitative research. We estimated relative importance scores and coefficients from regression analysis to understand the relative importance of attributes and conducted latent class analysis to explore heterogeneity in preferences. RESULTS: The 3 most important process attributes were (1) good communication between care team and patient/family, (2) care team educated patient/family about condition, and (3) care team incorporates the values of patient/family. The 3 most important outcome attributes were (1) patient satisfaction, (2) patient mental health, and (3) treatment maintains physical health. Latent class analyses showed that respondents had heterogeneous preferences. For process-related attributes, we identified 3 respondent groups: "Patient autonomy and support" (46% of respondents), "Education and care transitions" (18%), and "Shared decision-making" (36%). For outcome-related attributes, we identified 2 respondent groups: "Preserving function and appearance" (59% of respondents) and "Patient health and satisfaction" (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes such as patient satisfaction and health were the most important outcome attributes, and good communication and education from the care team were the most important process attributes. Respondents expressed heterogeneous preferences for selected DSD care attributes that providers should consider to improve satisfaction with and quality of DSD care.

[Differences in sexual development-S2k guideline update]. / Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung ­ Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie.

BACKGROUND: Human beings with a difference in sexual development (DSD) often underwent gender reassignment surgery during early childhood. However, the medical decision was often not congruent with the gender identity that affected persons developed later on. OBJECTIVES: To represent the interests of affected persons, an interdisciplinary guideline in cooperation with support groups was written. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The revision of the first version of the guideline, published in 2016, was edited by 18 professional societies and working groups as well as 3 support groups. A literature search was performed for each of the 12 chapters. Recommendations and statements created by the working groups were voted on during four consensus conferences. RESULTS: The guideline highlights the right of self-determination of affected persons. In this context, new legal requirements are reported. Other than necessary primary diagnostics, medical procedures should be postponed. Most important is the psychological support of parents and patients. Tumor risk of the gonads and protection of fertility are analyzed and discussed in detail. CONCLUSION: The content of the guideline represents a paradigm shift in dealing with human beings with a difference of sexual development. Projects as DSD Care and Empower-DSD help to promote the practical implementation of the guideline's recommendations.

Psychological support for individuals with differences of sex development (DSD).

OBJECTIVE: Congenital conditions with atypical development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex characteristics are referred to as Differences of Sex Development (DSD). Psychosocial care is recommended to be an integral part of clinical management for individuals with DSD. Few studies have examined the perceived need for, utilization of and the opinions of individuals with DSD regarding psychological support. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was part of a European multicentre study in 14 different medical centres in six countries. In total, 1040 individuals with DSD participated in a patient-reported outcome questionnaire asking about experiences and opinions regarding psychological support in DSD care. RESULTS: A majority of the participants reported that they had not received psychological support, in childhood and/or adolescence (70.6%, n = 692) nor in adulthood (67.9%, n = 661). Need for psychological support in childhood and/or adolescence was reported by 51.3% (n = 503), need for psychological support in adulthood, was reported by 49.5% (n = 482). The majority (80.2%; n = 718) agreed with the statement that people with DSD should always be offered psychological support. According to 78.7% (n = 697) of the participants, parents of children with DSD should always be offered psychological support. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the existing consensus that psychological support should be an integral part of DSD care. The discrepancy between received and perceived need for psychological support suggests that individuals with DSD experience barriers to access mental health care services. Psychosocial and psychological services for children, adolescents and adults should therefore be available and offered throughout the lifespan to individuals with DSD.

Diagnostic challenges and management advances in cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase deficiency, a rare form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia, with 46, XX karyotype.

Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase deficiency (PORD) is a rare form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia that can manifest with skeletal malformations, ambiguous genitalia, and menstrual disorders caused by cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR) mutations affecting electron transfer to all microsomal cytochrome P450 and some non-P450 enzymes involved in cholesterol, sterol, and drug metabolism. With the advancement of molecular biology and medical genetics, increasing numbers of PORD cases were reported, and the clinical spectrum of PORD was extended with studies on underlying mechanisms of phenotype-genotype correlations and optimum treatment. However, diagnostic challenges and management dilemma still exists because of unawareness of the condition, the overlapping manifestations with other disorders, and no clear guidelines for treatment. Delayed diagnosis and management may result in improper sex assignment, loss of reproductive capacity because of surgical removal of ruptured ovarian macro-cysts, and life-threatening conditions such as airway obstruction and adrenal crisis. The clinical outcomes and prognosis, which are influenced by specific POR mutations, the presence of additional genetic or environmental factors, and management, include early death due to developmental malformations or adrenal crisis, bilateral oophorectomies after spontaneous rupture of ovarian macro-cysts, genital ambiguity, abnormal pubertal development, and nearly normal phenotype with successful pregnancy outcomes by assisted reproduction. Thus, timely diagnosis including prenatal diagnosis with invasive and non-invasive techniques and appropriate management is essential to improve patients' outcomes. However, even in cases with conclusive diagnosis, comprehensive assessment is needed to avoid severe complications, such as chromosomal test to help sex assignment and evaluation of adrenal function to detect partial adrenal insufficiency. In recent years, it has been noted that proper hormone replacement therapy can lead to decrease or resolve of ovarian macro-cysts, and healthy babies can be delivered by in vitro fertilization and frozen embryo transfer following adequate control of multiple hormonal imbalances. Treatment may be complicated with adverse effects on drug metabolism caused by POR mutations. Unique challenges occur in female PORD patients such as ovarian macro-cysts prone to spontaneous rupture, masculinized genitalia without progression after birth, more frequently affected pubertal development, and impaired fertility. Thus, this review focuses only on 46, XX PORD patients to summarize the potential molecular pathogenesis, differential diagnosis of classic and non-classic PORD, and tailoring therapy to maintain health, avoid severe complications, and promote fertility.

Disorders of Sex Development in Office Practice.

Disorders of sex development (DSD) is a broad term for congenital conditions with a discrepancy in chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex. Pediatricians are often faced with the challenge of managing a newborn/infant with atypical genitalia or an older child with disordered puberty, which come under the purview of DSD. This article provides an update for pediatricians on comprehensive approach to DSD with a focus on atypical genitalia.

Intersex/Differences of sex development: Human rights at the intersection of cure and care.

Intersex people are viewed from the medicalised lens of having a "disorder" of sex development rather than a difference in sex development. This inherent indifference to diversity is also visible in LGBTQIA+ advocacy, as they were initially excluded from the Yogyakarta Principles promoting the human rights of sexual and gender minorities. This paper attempts to explore the issues of discrimination, social exclusion, and unnecessary medical treatments through the lens of the Human Rights in Patient Care framework to advance the human rights of the intersex community and highlight the need for the state to take responsibility. The discussion touches upon intersex people's right to bodily integrity; the right to freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment; the right to the highest attainable standard of health; and the right to legal and social recognition. The concept of human rights in patient care moves beyond the traditional philosophical principles of bioethics as it applies legal norms in a patient care context derived from judicial interpretations and international conventions upholding human rights at the intersection of cure and care. As socially accountable health professionals, it is our duty to defend the human rights of intersex people who are marginalised within the marginalised community.

Ovotesticular Difference of Sex Development: Genetic Background, Histological Features, and Clinical Management.

BACKGROUND: Ovotesticular disorder/difference of sex development (DSD) refers to the co-presence of testicular and ovarian tissue in one individual. Childhood management is challenging as there are many uncertainties regarding etiology, gonadal function, and gender outcome. SUMMARY: Ovotesticular DSD should mainly be considered in 46,XX children with atypical genitalia and normal adrenal steroid profiles. Various underlying genetic mechanisms have been described. Histological assessment of ovotestes requires expert revision and has many pitfalls. Neonatal sex assignment is essential, but as gender outcome is unpredictable, this should be regarded as provisional until a stable gender identity has developed. Therefore, it is crucial not to perform any irreversible medical or surgical procedure in affected individuals until adolescents can give their full informed consent. Gonadal function mostly allows for spontaneous pubertal development; however, fertility is compromised, especially in boys. Specific long-term outcome data for ovotesticular DSD are lacking but can be extrapolated from studies in other DSD populations. KEY MESSAGES: Management of ovotesticular DSD has changed in recent years, prioritizing the child's future right for autonomy and self-determination. The benefits and pitfalls of this new approach have not been documented yet and require intensive monitoring on an international scale.

Psychological Care of Children and Families with Variations or Differences in Sex Development.

The paediatric clinical psychology literature provides applicable evidence for use in specialist healthcare settings and services. The general approach of psychological care of children and families with paediatric conditions is recognizable as preventative and destigmatizing, aimed to maximize personal agency with shared responsibility for achieving best outcomes via multi-professional teamwork. Recent commentaries regarding healthcare for children with differences in sex development (DSD) have noted service-level pitfalls, including poor teamwork and underuse of early and integrated psychological intervention. Psychological research regarding the variously termed DSD, variations in sex development, variation in sex characteristics, or intersex has historically centred around the assessment of sex differences, gender identity, and the impact of including hormone influences on brain and behaviour. Psychological research in this specialist area has not focussed on the evaluation of specific clinical interventions or psychotherapeutic models but has investigated psychological aspects of multi-professional healthcare provision. There are new goals for psychological care of children with variations or differences in sex development (V/DSD). These require a framework of good communication to enable those receiving care to come to know and articulate their own hopes for treatment and support. Paediatric psychological intervention studies involving larger clinical groups such as diabetes provide evidence applicable to DSD populations. A risk of stigma is recognized as inherent to some physical interventions within routine paediatric care of people with V/DSD. Psychological care and intervention should be aimed at minimizing these risks via questioning and examining their assumed need. Psychological approaches can provide a foundation for ethical and rights-based multi-professional care of children with V/DSD.

Challenges Waiting for an Adult with DSD.

BACKGROUND: Disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) comprise a heterogeneous group of inborn conditions where the individual's sex chromosomes, gonads, and/or anatomical sex are discordant. Since the Chicago Consensus Conference in 2005, multidisciplinary care has been implemented in specialised paediatric tertiary care centres and clinical practice has substantially changed towards a more holistic approach. SUMMARY: Psychological support has become a key factor in the management of DSD. After paediatric care, one of the main challenges is the transition of patients to expert care in adulthood. Patients frequently experience difficulties in accessing specialised medical care in adulthood, resulting in loss to follow-up affecting the patients' physical and psychological health as well as quality of life. Clinical features and long-term outcomes are highly variable in most DSD conditions. Although medical care has improved, morbidity and mortality are increased in all conditions. A particular challenge in the care of DSD patients in adulthood is optimisation of fertility potential. Ideally, this is addressed already in adolescence and requires close interaction of not only paediatricians and adult endocrinologists but also urologists, andrologists or gynaecologists, and psychologists. KEY MESSAGES: This review addresses issues relating to transition of DSD care from the paediatric to adult care as well as health-related challenges in adulthood in DSD.

The Long Path to Our Current Understanding Regarding Care of Children with Differences/Disorders of Sexual Development.

Testes were associated with maleness from antiquity, and ancient societies had fanciful myths about the origins of the sexes and about fetal sexual development. 17th century anatomists developed the concept that mammals developed from eggs and discovered sperm in semen; in 1878, Hertwig observed sperm entering eggs (of sea urchins), establishing the cellular basis of sex development. Individuals with atypical genitalia were known clinically in the 17th century, with much debate about their origins, but by the late 19th century it was generally accepted that gonads determined sex, and that sex determined gender role. Testosterone was isolated in 1935, and Alfred Jost showed that both circulating testosterone and diffusible anti-Mullerian hormone were needed for male development. Patients with apparent androgen insensitivity were reported in 1937 and shown to be unresponsive to exogenous androgen by Lawson Wilkins in 1957; androgen receptor mutations were reported in 1989. Steroidogenic errors were associated with differences in sex development (DSDs) starting in the 1940s, and finding mutations in the responsible enzymes explained many forms of hyper- and hypo-androgenism in both sexes. Sex chromosomes were identified in the early 20th century; Y was associated with maleness, and the responsible SRY gene was identified in 1991. Early efforts to manage patients with DSDs were confounded by philosophical perspectives on the relative roles of prenatal biology versus postnatal environment. Approaches to natal sex assignment evolved in the later 20th century and now emphasize a team approach based on data, not guessing, parental involvement, cultural considerations, and the acknowledgement of uncertainty.

"Waking up" the sleeping metaphor of normality in connection to intersex or DSD: a scoping review of medical literature.

The aim of the study is to encourage a critical debate on the use of normality in the medical literature on DSD or intersex. For this purpose, a scoping review was conducted to identify and map the various ways in which "normal" is used in the medical literature on DSD between 2016 and 2020. We identified 75 studies, many of which were case studies highlighting rare cases of DSD, others, mainly retrospective observational studies, focused on improving diagnosis or treatment. The most common use of the adjective normal was in association with phenotypic sex. Overall, appearance was the most commonly cited criteria to evaluate the normality of sex organs. More than 1/3 of the studies included also medical photographs of sex organs. This persistent use of normality in reference to phenotypic sex is worrisome given the long-term medicalization of intersex bodies in the name of a "normal" appearance or leading a "normal" life. Healthcare professionals should be more careful about the ethical implications of using photographs in publications given that many intersex persons describe their experience with medical photography as dehumanizing.

Sexual Developmental Disorders in Pediatrics.

Abstract: Disorders of sex development (DSD) are a heterogeneous group of pathologies that result in an alteration in sex determination or differentiation. DSD are estimated to affect 1: 4,500 newborns and according to the 2006 Chicago Consensus classification, DSD can be divided into three categories: those with a 46 XX karyotype, those with a 46 XY karyotype and those relating to sex chromosomes. It is crucial to correctly identify the pathology already in the first days of life to direct the patient and his family to the best path of care. For this reason, the role of the pediatrician is fundamental in the correct identification of the clinical picture and in supporting the family during the long process that involves the management of these patients. To make a diagnosis, it is necessary to follow a path led by a multidisciplinary team that includes several steps such as the execution of the genetic analysis, the evaluation with diagnostic imaging methods and laboratory evaluations. The therapeutic management, on the other hand, is still very complex even if in recent years we have moved from an attitude of early gender reassignment to an approach of watchful waiting to let the patient choose when she/he is mature enough to do so, which gender she/he feels to belong. It should not be forgotten that throughout this process the pediatrician must be both supportive and clinically active in the management of the child and his family.

Integration of child life services in the delivery of multi-disciplinary differences in Sexual Development (DSD) and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) care.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefit of incorporating certified child life specialist (CCLS) services in various aspects of pediatric care. Although the significance of psychosocial support of patients with Disorders of Sexual Development (DSD) and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) is increasingly recognized, the involvement of CCLS services into the DSD and CAH multidisciplinary care model has yet to be described. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and patient and family experience of routinely incorporating CCLS services into the multidisciplinary DSD and CAH care model. STUDY DESIGN: As part of a quality improvement initiative, CCLS services were routinely incorporated in the multidisciplinary DSD and CAH clinics at our institution. Encounters for patients seen in clinic between July 2018 through October 2019 were reviewed for demographic information, DSD diagnosis classification, CCLS documentation, and whether an exam under anesthesia (EUA) was required due to an incomplete clinical exam. CCLS documentation was reviewed for assessments, interventions, whether patients tolerated their physical exams, time of CCLS services, and additional CCLS support beyond the physical exam. All patients were limited to one physical exam per clinic visit. RESULTS: Out of the 45 encounters with CCLS involvement, 42 (93.3%) exams were well-tolerated. CCLS assessments considered patient development, communication considerations, temperament, medical stressors, coping preferences, and patient preferences for activities and distractions. Interventions included preparing patients for their physical exams, encouragement before and during exams, addressing patient stressors, distractions and coping mechanisms, and advocating for the patient. No patients required an EUA. DISCUSSION: The CCLS aimed to provide families with a sense of control during clinic visits and teach them to advocate for themselves. The CCLS helped prepare and distract patients for their clinic visit and addressed the sensitive nature of the physical exam by focusing on the emotional and development needs of patients. CCLS contributions to a positive patient experience are consistent with multiple studies demonstrating the benefit of CCLS services for pediatric care. This quality improvement initiative ultimately helped to create a positive experience for patients and families. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and positive impact of CCLS services in the delivery of patient and family-centered care for patients with DSD and CAH as part of the multidisciplinary team model.

Delivery of multidisciplinary care in the field of differences and disorders of sex development (DSD).

INTRODUCTION: Differences and disorders of sex development (DSD) are a diverse group of conditions, which often present in early childhood and may require input from a group of experts in a wide range of clinical fields. Clinical guidance in this field recommends that these experts function as a multidisciplinary team (MDT) within which each expert has a defined role, which ensures an integrated and streamlined approach to the care of affected individuals. AREAS COVERED: This review will focus on the benefits of multidisciplinary care for people with DSD, as well as the challenges that may be faced. EXPERT OPINION: Core members of the MDT for people with DSD include endocrinologists, surgeons, psychologists, geneticists, specialist nurses, radiologists, and gynecologists, although many other health-care professionals may also be pertinent, at different stages of the patient's life. With greater acceptance of remote and digital health-care technology, there is a need to review the traditional concepts of the clinical MDT so that new care models can be explored for effective and efficient delivery of complex care.

Differences or Disorders of sex development in Boys: impact on fertility.

Differences or disorders of sex development (DSD) include various congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex development is atypical. The incidence varies according to the category of DSD but the total incidence is high if hypospadias and undescended testes are included. Fertility prospects may be a concern for DSD patients and their parents. With the development of modern medical technologies and treatment opportunities, fertility diagnostics, information, and treatment have changed. Assisted reproductive technology has developed during the past decades and has become more available with an improving success rate. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and testicular sperm retrieval, have further improved the possibilities for men with DSD to become biological parents. Some studies have determined the presence of germ cells in the gonads of patients with DSD suggesting that the potential for fertility may be higher than previously thought. However, fertility outcomes among individuals with DSD have not been fully investigated. Moreover, previous study showed that information on fertility problems and treatment possibilities given to patients with DSD needs to be improved. The use of registries to study fertility outcomes is essential for a better knowledge of fertility in patients with these rare conditions.

Is intersexuality a mere difference or disorder?

Is intersexuality a mere difference or disorder? Since the 2006 Chicago consensus statement's disorder of sexual development (DSD) nomenclature, intersex scholars have criticized and repudiated the use of "disorder" by arguing that it is medically inaccurate, yields unwarranted surgical implications, unnecessarily pathologizes intersex individuals, and that, most importantly, intersex individuals do not prefer it. They argue for linguistic alternatives such as "difference" and other similar alternatives, for example, "variation," "divergence," and so forth. These criticisms of "disorder" have had significant uptake by scholars writing on intersexuality. While the motivation(s) for using "mere difference" is doubtless rooted in beneficence for intersex persons, medically inaccurate intersex terminology compromises optimal clinical care and should consequently be either abandoned or revised. This focus paper argues (moderately) for the thesis that some cases of intersex are disorders, and some mere differences. The upshot of my proposal is not only that it conceptually disambiguates disorder and mere difference, but by failing to generalize unique intersex individuals their care is prioritized.

Differences of Sex Development: What Neonatologists Need to Know.

Differences of sex development (DSD) refer to rare conditions in which an individual's sex development is different from typical male or female development. The neonatologist is often the first health care provider to interact with parents of newborns with DSD and must be familiar with the approach to patients with DSD. In this article, we discuss definition of DSD, initial workup of the patient with DSD, terminology, and controversies in care.