Incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary center and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to determine the incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. METHODS: Consecutive patients who benefited from sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease from January 2007 to June 2021 were identified based on operative codes. Recurrent episodes were identified based on hospitalization codes and reviewed. Survival analysis was performed and was reported using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Follow-up was censored for last hospital visit and diverticulitis recurrence. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting on the incidence of diverticulitis after sigmoid colectomy. The review was registered into PROSPERO (CRD42021237003, 25/06/2021). RESULTS: One thousand three-hundred and fifty-six patients benefited from sigmoid colectomy. Four hundred and three were excluded, leaving 953 patients for inclusion. The mean age at time of sigmoid colectomy was 64.0 + / - 14.7 years. Four hundred and fifty-eight patients (48.1%) were males. Six hundred and twenty-two sigmoid colectomies (65.3%) were performed in the elective setting and 331 (34.7%) as emergency surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.8 + / - 4.1 years. During this period, 10 patients (1.1%) developed reccurent diverticulitis. Nine of these episodes were classified as Hinchey 1a, and one as Hinchey 1b. The incidence of diverticulitis recurrence (95% CI) was as follows: at 1 year: 0.37% (0.12-1.13%), at 5 years: 1.07% (0.50-2.28%), at 10 years: 2.14% (1.07-4.25%) and at 15 years: 2.14% (1.07-4.25%). Risk factors for recurrence could not be assessed by logistic regression due to the low number of incidental cases. The systematic review of the literature identified 15 observational studies reporting on the incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy, which ranged from 0 to 15% for a follow-up period ranging between 2 months and over 10 years. CONCLUSION: The incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy is of 2.14% at 15 years, and is mostly composed of Hinchey 1a episodes. The incidences reported in the literature are heterogeneous.

Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Postoperative Complications After Colectomy for Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) has proven efficacy as a prognostic tool for postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for neoplastic diseases. However, the role of the NPS score in inflammatory surgical diseases has not yet been studied. We aimed to evaluate NPS predictive value in patients undergoing colectomy due to diverticulitis. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study including all patients who underwent colectomy for diverticulitis between July 2008 and March 2020 was established. Patients' demographics, clinical and surgical data were recorded and analyzed. Patients were scored on a scale of 0-4 and received one point for preoperation albumin <4 g/dL, cholesterol ≤180 mg/dL, Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio >2.96, and Lymphocyte to Monocyte ≤4.44. RESULTS: Out of 3292 patients admitted because of diverticulitis during the study period, 159 patients (4.83%) underwent colectomy. Of those patients, fifty patients were eligible for NPS analysis. 35 patients (70%) were females with a mean age of 62.81 ± 14.51. Thirty-two (64%) patients underwent an elective operation. The postoperative complications rate was 36% (N = 18). The mortality rate was 6% (N = 3). ROC showed a strong association between the NPS and mortality (area = .88, P = .03) and wound infection (area = .78, P = .01). In patients who underwent urgent surgery, there was an association between NPS and re-operation (P = .04). There was a correlation between NPS and Clavien-Dindo score (Spearman's coefficient = .284, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: The Naples prognostic score is an effective tool for predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing colectomy for diverticulitis. It may assist the surgeon in deciding on extent of the operation for diverticulitis and in elective cases also on timing.

Recurrence of diverticulitis after prophylactic sigmoidectomy: an underestimated problem?

AIM: Several papers have been published about the risk of recurrence after an attack of diverticulitis treated conservatively. However, very few papers have been devoted to the risk of postoperative recurrence of diverticulitis (PRD) after prophylactic sigmoidectomy (PS). The aim of this work was to report the rate of PRD after PS and to assess possible risk factors for recurrence after surgery. METHOD: All consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic PS for diverticulitis between 2005 and 2019 were retrospectively included. PRD was assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty four patients (199 men, mean age 54 ± 13 years) were included. Among these, 26 (7%) presented with 1.7 ± 1 (range 1-4) episodes of recurrence of diverticulitis after a mean delay of 44 ± 39 months (1 month-11 years) after surgery. Patients who presented with postoperative recurrence of diverticulitis were younger (46 ± 11 vs. 55 ± 13 years, p = 0.002) and more frequently had uncomplicated diverticulitis [15/26 (58%) vs. 97/338 (29%), p = 0.002] and more than two previous episodes before PS [17/26 (65%) vs. 132/338 (39%), p = 0.009] than patients without PRD. After multivariate analysis, two independent risk factors for PRD were identified: patients with more than two episodes before PS (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.2-9, p = 0.005) and age < 50 years (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 2-11, p = 0.001). If both factors were present, recurrence reached 18% (9/51). CONCLUSION: Postoperative recurrence of diverticulitis is rare (7%) after PS for diverticulitis. Some patients (i.e. those with more than two episodes before PS and/or age <50 years) could be exposed to a higher risk of recurrence (up to 18%), making prophylactic surgery questionable in these patients.

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Colonic Diverticular Disease].

Colonic diverticulosis is one of the most common conditions of the digestive system and patients generally remain asymptomatic. However, about 20% of patients develop symptomatic diverticular disease such as acute diverticulitis or diverticular hemorrhage, and these have become a huge burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Recent understanding of the pathophysiology of diverticulosis and diverticular disease suggests the role of multiple factors including genetic and environment. Based on this understanding, a preventive strategy to reduce the risk factors of diverticulosis and diverticular disease is highly recommended. The diagnosis of the acute diverticulitis relies on imaging modalities such as an abdominal-pelvic CT scan together with symptoms and signs. Treatment of diverticular disease should be individualized and include modification of lifestyle, use of antibiotics, and surgery. Recent guidelines recommend pursuing less aggressive treatment for patients with acute diverticulitis. This review will provide an overview of both the existing and evolving understanding regarding colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease and can help clinicians in the management of their patients with diverticular disease.

Challenging Surgical Dogma: Controversies in Diverticulitis.

Diverticulosis of the sigmoid colon is common in the developed world, affecting approximately 33% of persons older than 60 years. Up to 15% of these patients will develop diverticulitis at some point in their lifetime. The incidence of diverticulitis has increased in the last decade, accounting for nearly 300,000 US hospital admissions and $1.8 billion in annual direct medical costs. With such a wide prevalence and diverse spectrum of clinical presentation, there are bound to be multiple controversies regarding disease management. This article will serve to educate the reader on several important areas to consider when treating this ubiquitous disease.

Socioeconomic disparities in ostomy reversal among older adults with diverticulitis are more substantial among non-Hispanic Black patients.

BACKGROUND: While ostomies for diverticulitis are often intended to be temporary, ostomy reversal rates can be as low as 46%. There are few comprehensive studies evaluating the effects of socioeconomic status as a disparity in ostomy reversal. We hypothesized that among the elderly Medicare population undergoing partial colectomy for diverticulitis, lower socioeconomic status would be associated with reduced reversal rates. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using a 20% representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries >65 years old with diverticulitis who received ostomies between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017. We evaluated the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status, measured by the Social Deprivation Index, on ostomy reversal within 1 year. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality. RESULTS: Of 10,572 patients, ostomy reversals ranged from 21.2% (low socioeconomic status) to 29.8% (highest socioeconomic status), with a shorter time to reversal among higher socioeconomic status groups. Patients with low socioeconomic status were less likely to have their ostomies reversed, compared with the highest socioeconomic status group (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.93) and were more likely to die (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.33). When stratified by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, non-Hispanic White patients at every socioeconomic status had a higher reversal rate than non-Hispanic Black patients (White patients 32.0%-24.8% vs Black patients 19.6%-14.7%). Socioeconomic status appeared to have a higher relative impact among non-Hispanic Black patients. CONCLUSION: Among Medicare diverticulitis patients, ostomy reversal rates are low. Patients with lower socioeconomic status are less likely to undergo stoma reversal and are more likely to die; Black patients are least likely to have an ostomy reversal.

Conditional risk of diverticulitis after non-operative management.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe conditional recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients after an index episode of diverticulitis managed without surgery, and to estimate the difference in conditional RFS for diverticulitis according to specific risk factors. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including all patients managed without surgery for acute sigmoid diverticulitis at two university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Conditional RFS for diverticulitis was estimated over 10 years of follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed at the index episode and again 2 years later. RESULTS: In total, 991 patients were included for analysis. The 1, 2- and 3-year actuarial diverticulitis RFS rates were 81·1, 71·5 and 67·5 per cent respectively. Compared with the 1-year actuarial RFS rate of 81·1 per cent, the 1-year conditional RFS increased with each additional year survived recurrence-free, reaching 96·0 per cent after surviving the first 4 years recurrence-free. A similar phenomenon was observed for 2-year diverticulitis conditional RFS. Lower age (hazard ratio (HR) 0·98, 95 per cent c.i. 0·98 to 0·99), Charlson Co-morbidity Index score of 2 or above (HR 1·78, 1·32 to 2·39) and immunosuppression (HR 1·85, 1·38 to 2·48) were independently associated with recurrence of diverticulitis from the index episode. At 2 years from the index episode, immunosuppression was no longer associated with diverticulitis recurrence (HR 1·02, 0·50 to 2·09). CONCLUSION: The conditional RFS of patients with diverticulitis improved with each year that was survived recurrence-free. Although several factors at index presentation may be associated with early recurrence, the conditional probability of recurrence according to many of these risk factors converged with time.

ANTECEDENTES: El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la supervivencia condicional libre de recidiva de diverticulitis (diverticulitis recurrence-free survival, Div-RFS) en pacientes tras un episodio de diverticulitis tratado de forma conservadora, y calcular la diferencia en la Div-RFS condicional de acuerdo con factores de riesgo específicos. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico que incluyó a todos los pacientes tratados de forma no quirúrgica por diverticulitis sigmoidea aguda en dos hospitales afiliados a la universidad en Montreal, Quebec, Canadá. La supervivencia condicional libre de recidiva de la diverticulitis se calculó durante 10 años de seguimiento. Se realizó un análisis mediante un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox en el episodio índice y nuevamente 2 años después. RESULTADOS: En total, se incluyeron 991 pacientes en el análisis. La Div-RFS actuarial a 1, 2 y 3 años fue del 81,1%, 71,5% y 67,5%, respectivamente. En comparación con la Div-RFS actuarial a 1 año del 81,1%, la Div-RFS condicional a 1 año aumentó con cada año adicional sobrevivido sin recidiva, alcanzando el 96,0% después de sobrevivir los primeros 4 años sin recidiva. Se observó un fenómeno similar para Div-RFS condicional a los 2 años. Una menor edad (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR: 0,98; i.c. del 95%: 0,98 a 0,99), la puntuación de comorbilidad de Charlson ≥ 2 (HR: 1,78; i.c. del 95%: 1,32 a 2,39) y la inmunosupresión (HR: 1,85; i.c. del 95%: 1,38 a 2,48) se asociaron de forma independiente con la recidiva de la diverticulitis desde el episodio índice. En la regresión de Cox a los 2 años del episodio índice, la inmunosupresión ya no se asoció con recidiva de diverticulitis (HR: 1,02; i.c. del 95% 0,50-2,09). CONCLUSIÓN: La Div-RFS condicional mejoró con cada año de supervivencia sin recidiva. Si bien varios factores en la presentación del episodio índice pueden estar asociados con una recidiva precoz, la probabilidad condicional de recidiva en relación con muchos de estos factores de riesgo coincidió con el tiempo.

Acute diverticulitis: old challenge, current trends, open questions.

Acute diverticulitis (AD) is an increasing issue for health systems worldwide. As accuracy of clinical symptoms and laboratory examinations is poor, a pivotal role in preoperative diagnosis and severity assessment is played by CT scan. Several new classifications trying to adapt the intraoperative Hinchey's classification to preoperative CT findings have been proposed, but none really entered clinical practice. Treatment of early AD is mostly conservative (antibiotics) and may be administered in outpatients in selected cases. Larger abscesses (exceeding 3 to 5 cm) need percutaneous drainage, while management of stages 3 (purulent peritonitis) and 4 (fecal peritonitis) is difficult to standardize, as various approaches are nowadays suggested. Three situations are identified: situation A, stage 3 in stable/healthy patients, where various options are available, including conservative management, lavage/drainage and primary resection/anastomosis w/without protective stoma; situation B, stage 3 in unstable and/or unhealthy patients, and stage 4 in stable/healthy patients, where stoma-protected primary resection/anastomosis or Hartmann procedure should be performed; situation C, stage 4 in unstable and/or unhealthy patients, where Hartmann procedure or damage control surgery (resection without any anastomosis/stoma) are suggested. Late, elective sigmoid resection is less and less performed, as a new trend towards a patient-tailored management is spreading.

Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of lipomatosis of the sciatic nerve: Early-onset colonic diverticular disease.

BACKGROUND: Lipomatosis of nerve (LN) is a complex peripheral nerve disorder characterized by fibrofatty nerve enlargement. MRI of this pathology is pathognomonic and obviates a diagnostic biopsy. Mutation in PIK3CA has been associated with LN cases with nerve-territory overgrowth which may occur in some cases. We evaluate an association of LN of the sciatic nerve and early-onset colonic diverticular disease and discuss the potential pathogenesis. METHODS: Our institutional database was searched for LN cases. Available information of identified cases was reviewed, and cases with a confirmed diagnosis of LN affecting the lumbosacral plexus and/or sciatic nerve; available MRI of the affected nerve(s); and diverticular disease occurring in the area supplied by the nerve(s) affected by LN were further analyzed. PIK3CA mutation testing was performed on available tissue samples. RESULTS: We identified 10 LN cases of lumbosacral plexus and/or sciatic nerve. Of these, three fulfilled our inclusion criteria. All three patients had concomitant colonic diverticular disease, diagnosed at a relatively young age. MRI studies of these cases showed LN involvement of the sacral nerves innervating the sigmoid colon. All three also had abnormal diagnostic workup including various GI tests and evidence of associated nerve-territory overgrowth. Colonic tissue samples for PIK3CA mutation were negative. CONCLUSION: While the pathogenesis of the colonic diverticular disease is increasingly recognized as being multifactorial, our observations are consistent with the potential role of autonomic nervous system dysfunction affecting either the pelvic floor musculature, or the colon itself (or both) in a subset of patients with early-onset diverticular disease.

Management and Outcomes of Diverticulitis After Lung Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Most lung transplant patients are older than 50 years. Complications from colonic diverticula are not uncommon, especially with chronic immunosuppression. However, limited data exist regarding the optimal management of these patients. We sought to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of diverticulitis after lung transplant. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to review patients undergoing lung transplant between 2007 and 2016 with posttransplant acute colonic diverticulitis. Patients were grouped based on medical or surgical management. RESULTS: Of 512 transplant recipients, 17 (3.32%) developed 26 episodes of diverticulitis over a median follow-up of 39 months. Nine patients had documented diverticulosis on pretransplant colonoscopy. These patients had a higher incidence of surgical intervention for diverticulitis, were more likely to have recurrent diverticulitis, and had longer lengths of stay than patients without pretransplant diverticulosis. Six (35.3%) of 17 patients required surgery (ie, Hartmann procedure; 4 during the initial episode and 2 during their third and fourth episodes); 11 patients (64.7%) were managed with antibiotics alone. Patients in the surgical group presented earlier posttransplant (P = .004) and were on higher doses of tacrolimus (P = .03). Six (46.1%) of 13 patients with medically managed first episodes of diverticulitis experienced recurrence. No recurrence occurred after surgical management. No deaths were attributable to diverticulitis in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pretransplant diverticulosis experienced earlier, more complicated episodes of diverticulitis posttransplant than patients without. Surgical patients received higher doses of tacrolimus and presented earlier than medical patients. Uncomplicated diverticulitis in posttransplant patients can be managed medically, even in the case of recurrent, uncomplicated disease.

An unusual endoscopic finding - Acute diverticulitis / Un hallazgo endoscópico inusual - diverticulitis aguda

No disponible

Novel swine model of colonic diverticulosis.

The pathophysiology of colonic diverticulosis has not been completely understood. The development of appropriate animal models is essential to study diverticular disease. To date, no large animal models are available for this disease condition. The objective of this study was to develop a swine model by damaging the colon wall, combined with or without a low-fiber diet to mimic the pathogenesis of diverticulosis. To create a weakness on the colon wall, collagenase was applied in vivo to degrade the collagen in the colon wall. Three groups of Yucatan minipigs were included. Group 1 (n = 12) underwent collagenase injection (CI) with a low-fiber diet for 6 mo, group 2 (n = 8) underwent CI alone with a standard swine diet for 6 mo, and group 3 (n = 12) received a low-fiber diet alone for 6 mo. We found that diverticulosis occurred in 91.7% (11 of 12) of pigs in the CI + diet group and 100% (8 of 8) in CI-alone group. Moreover, around 30-75% of colon CI spots for each pig developed diverticular lesions. Diet alone for 6 mo did not induce diverticulosis. The endoscopic and histological examinations revealed the formation of multiple wide-mouthed diverticular lesions along the descending colon. Our results provide convincing evidence of the high efficacy of the reduced colon wall strength caused by CI in the development of a swine model of diverticulosis. Low-fiber diet consumption for 6 mo had no influence on the generation time or incidence rate of diverticulosis. In this model, digestion of the collagen in the colonic wall is sufficient to cause diverticulosis. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Effective large animal models of diverticulosis are currently lacking for the study of diverticular disease. This study marks the first time that a swine model of diverticulosis was developed by damaging colon wall structure, combined with or without a low-fiber diet. We found that a defect of colon wall could result in colon diverticular lesions within 6 mo in swine. This animal model mimicking the pathological process of diverticulosis is of great clinical value.

Distinct Clinical Factors in Hospitalized Patients with Diverticular Bleeding and Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unclear why colonic diverticular bleeding and diverticulitis rarely coexist. This study compared the characteristics of these conditions. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study examined 310 consecutive patients hospitalized with an episode of diverticular disease (cases) and outpatients without a diverticular episode (controls) from January 2012 to December 2015. We investigated distinct clinical factors in hospitalized patients with diverticular bleeding and diverticulitis. RESULTS: We identified 183 patients with 263 episodes of diverticular bleeding and 127 patients with 135 episodes of diverticulitis during the study period. Patients with diverticular bleeding were significantly older than those with diverticulitis (median age 76 vs. 56 years) and had more cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, lipid disorder, or a poorer performance status. Significantly more diverticular bleeding patients were taking antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulant drugs, proton pump inhibitors, or laxative agents. Multivariate analysis revealed that an age > 65 years (OR 5.42), and antiplatelet agent use (OR 7.29) were more significant risk factors for diverticular bleeding than for diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people using antiplatelet drugs may be more susceptible to diverticular bleeding than diverticulitis.

Changing theories on the pathogenesis and risk factors for diverticulitis.

Diverticulitis was thought to be a simple complication of an even simpler disease (diverticulosis), but may in fact result from an entirely new set of complex pathologies. Considering diverticulitis is increasing in annual incidence and becoming more prevalent in younger populations, the implications of appropriate management become more vital than ever. This article reviews old and new understandings of diverticulitis and current recommendations for prevention and clinical management.

Management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of predictors of treatment failure.

BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is a common complication of diverticular disease of the colon. While complicated diverticulitis often warrants intervention, acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) is usually managed conservatively. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conservative treatment of AUD without antibiotics compared to standard antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature review in compliance with PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched. Studies that assessed efficacy and safety of treatment of AUD without antibiotics were included. Outcome parameters were rates of treatment failure, recurrence of diverticulitis, complications and mortality, readmission to hospital, and need for surgery. RESULTS: Nine studies including 2565 patients were included to the review. Of these patients, 65.1% were treated conservatively without antibiotics. Treatment failure was observed in 5.1% of patients not-given-antibiotic treatment versus 3.4% of those given antibiotic treatment. Recurrent diverticulitis occurred in 9.3% of patients in the non-antibiotic group versus 12.1% of patients in the antibiotic group. On meta-analysis of the studies, there were no significant differences between non-antibiotic and antibiotic treatment groups regarding rates of treatment failure (OR = 1.5, p = 0.06), recurrence of diverticulitis (OR = 0.81, p = 0.2), complications (OR = 0.56, p = 0.25), readmission rates (OR = 0.97, p = 0.91), need for surgery (OR = 0.59, p = 0.28), and mortality (OR = 0.64, p = 0.47). The only variable that was significantly associated with treatment failure in the non-antibiotic treatment group was associated comorbidities (standard error (SE) = - 0.07, 95% CI - 0.117 - 0.032; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of AUD without antibiotics is feasible, safe, and effective. Adding broad-spectrum antibiotics to the treatment regimen did not serve to decrease treatment failure, recurrence, complications, hospital readmissions, and need for surgery significantly compared to non-antibiotic treatment.

Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.

Acute colonic diverticulitis is a gastrointestinal condition frequently encountered by primary care practitioners, hospitalists, surgeons, and gastroenterologists. Clinical presentation ranges from mild abdominal pain to peritonitis with sepsis. It can often be diagnosed on the basis of clinical features alone, but imaging is necessary in more severe presentations to rule out such complications as abscess and perforation. Treatment depends on the severity of the presentation, presence of complications, and underlying comorbid conditions. Medical and surgical treatment algorithms are evolving. This article provides an evidence-based, clinically relevant overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of acute diverticulitis.

Newly developed endoscopic detachable snare ligation therapy for colonic diverticular hemorrhage: a multicenter phase II trial (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We previously reported preliminary safety results for a new method, endoscopic detachable snare ligation (EDSL), for diverticular hemorrhage. This method does not need endoscope removal to attach a ligation device after detection of the bleeding site. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDSL in a larger patient population. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in 12 institutions. Patients suspected of having diverticular hemorrhage without serious systemic disease were enrolled. The primary endpoint was early (within 30 days) recurrent bleeding rate in patients treated with EDSL. The secondary endpoints were overall early recurrent bleeding rate in patients with definite diverticular bleeding and adverse events in patients treated with EDSL. RESULTS: From June 2015 to March 2017, bleeding diverticula were detected in 123 of 205 enrolled patients (60%), of whom 101 (82%) were treated with EDSL. Most patients (20/22) in whom EDSL was not successful were treated with clipping. The early recurrent bleeding rate was 7.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6%-13.2%; 8/101) in patients who could be treated with EDSL. The median total endoscopic and EDSL procedure time was 40 minutes (interquartile range, 15-71) and 4 minutes (interquartile range, 1-7), respectively. Two mild adverse events, colonic diverticulitis and temporary abdominal pain, were observed. CONCLUSION: EDSL was confirmed to be useful and safe for treatment of colonic diverticular hemorrhage. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000001858.).

Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis: Low Stoma Rate Using a "Damage Control Strategy".

PURPOSE: Optimal surgical management of perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon has yet to be clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy of a "Damage Control Strategy" (DCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon complicated by generalized peritonitis (Hinchey III and IV) surgically treated according to a damage control strategy between May 2011 and February 2017 were enrolled in the present multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were collected at three surgical centers. DCS comprises a two-stage concept: [1] limited resection of the perforated colon segment with oral and aboral blind closure during the emergency procedure and [2] definitive reconstruction at scheduled second laparotomy (anastomosis ∓ loop ileostomy or a Hartmann's procedure) after 24-48 h. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included into the analysis [W:M 28:30, median age 70.1 years (30-92)]. Eleven patients (19%) initially presented with fecal peritonitis (Hinchey IV) and 47 patients with purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III). An anastomosis could be created during the second procedure in 48 patients (83%), 14 of those received an additional loop ileostomy. In the remaining ten patients (n = 17%), an end colostomy was created at second laparotomy. A fecal diversion was performed in five patients to treat anastomotic complications. Thus, altogether, 29 patients (50%) had stoma at the end of the hospital stay. The postoperative mortality was 9% (n = 5), and median postoperative hospital stay was 18.5 days (3-66). At the end of the follow-up, 44 of 53 surviving patients were stoma free (83%). CONCLUSION: The use of the Damage Control strategy leads to a comparatively low stoma rate in patients suffering from perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis.