Safety and Efficacy of Cenobamate for the Treatment of Focal Seizures in Older Patients: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures. OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis of a phase III, open-label safety study assessed the safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in older adults versus the overall study population. METHODS: Adults aged 18-70 years with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of one to three ASMs were enrolled in the phase III, open-label safety study; adults aged 65-70 years from that study were included in our safety analysis. Discontinuations due to adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed throughout the study in all patients who received one or more doses of cenobamate (safety study population). Efficacy was assessed post hoc in patients who had adequate seizure data available (post hoc efficacy population); we assessed patients aged 65-70 years from that population. Overall, 100% responder rates were assessed in the post hoc efficacy maintenance-phase population in 3-month intervals. Concomitant ASM drug load changes were also measured. For each ASM, drug load was defined as the ratio of actual drug dose/day to the World Health Organization defined daily dose (DDD). RESULTS: Of 1340 patients (mean age 39.7 years) in the safety study population, 42 were ≥ 65 years of age (mean age 67.0 years, 52.4% female). Median duration of exposure was 36.1 and 36.9 months for overall patients and older patients, respectively, and mean epilepsy duration was 22.9 and 38.5 years, respectively. At 1, 2, and 3 years, 80%, 72%, and 68% of patients overall, and 76%, 71%, and 69% of older patients, respectively, remained on cenobamate. Common TEAEs (≥ 20%) were somnolence and dizziness in overall patients, and somnolence, dizziness, fall, fatigue, balance disorder, and upper respiratory tract infection in older patients. Falls in older patients occurred after a mean 452.1 days of adjunctive cenobamate treatment (mean dose 262.5 mg/day; mean concomitant ASM drug load 2.46). Of 240 patients in the post hoc efficacy population, 18 were ≥ 65 years of age. Mean seizure frequency at baseline was 18.1 seizures/28 days for the efficacy population and 3.1 seizures/28 days for older patients. Rates of 100% seizure reduction within 3-month intervals during the maintenance phase increased over time for the overall population (n = 214) and older adults (n = 15), reaching 51.9% and 78.6%, respectively, by 24 months. Mean percentage change in concomitant ASM drug load, not including cenobamate, was reduced in the overall efficacy population (31.8%) and older patients (36.3%) after 24 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this post hoc analysis showed notable rates of efficacy in older patients taking adjunctive cenobamate. Rates of several individual TEAEs occurred more frequently in older patients. Further reductions in concomitant ASMs may be needed in older patients when starting cenobamate to avoid adverse effects such as somnolence, dizziness, and falls. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535091.

Impact of antithrombotic therapy on acute and delayed intracranial haemorrhage and evaluation of the need of short-term hospitalisation based on CT findings after mild traumatic brain injury: experience from an oral and maxillofacial surgery unit.

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to compare the prevalence of acute and delayed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in patients on antithrombotic medication referred to a clinic for oral and plastic maxillofacial surgery. The secondary aim was to evaluate the need for short-term hospitalisation based on initial radiological and clinical findings. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective single-centre study of all patients on antithrombotic medication who were admitted to our department of oral and plastic maxillofacial surgery with mTBI over a 5 year period. Demographic and anamnesis data, injury characteristics, antithrombotic medication, radiological findings, treatment, and outcome were analysed. Patients were divided into the following four groups based on their antithrombotic medication: (1) single antiplatelet users, (2) vitamin K antagonist users, (3) direct oral anticoagulant users, and (4) double antithrombotic users. All patients underwent an emergency cranial CT (CT0) at admission. Based on clinical and radiological evaluation, different treatment protocols were applied. Patients with positive CT0 findings and patients with secondary neurological deterioration received a control CT (CT1) before discharge. Acute and delayed ICH and patient's outcome during hospitalisation were evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 696 patients (mean age, 71.6 years) on antithrombotic medication who presented at our department with mTBI were included in the analysis. Most injuries were caused by a ground-level fall (76.9%). Thirty-six patients (5.1%) developed an acute traumatic ICH, and 47 intracerebral lesions were detected by radiology-most of these in patients taking acetylsalicylic acid. No association was detected between ICH and antithrombotic medication (p = 0.4353). In total, 258 (37.1%) patients were admitted for 48 h in-hospital observation. The prevalence of delayed ICH was 0.1%, and the mortality rate was 0.1%. Multivariable analysis identified a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of < 15, loss of consciousness, amnesia, headache, dizziness, and nausea as clinical characteristics significantly associated with an increased risk of acute ICH, whereas age, sex, and trauma mechanism were not associated with ICH prevalence. Of the 39 patients who underwent a control CT1, most had a decreasing or at least constant intracranial lesion; in three patients, intracranial bleeding increased but was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: According to our experience, antithrombotic therapy does not increase the rate of ICH after mTBI. A GCS of < 15, loss of consciousness, amnesia, headache, dizziness, and nausea are indicators of higher ICH risk. A second CT scan is more effective in patients with secondary neurological deterioration. Initial CT findings were not clinically relevant and should not indicate in-hospital observation.

Effect of intraperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a single-center randomized double-blinded controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of intraperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine alone on the quality of postoperative recovery of patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). METHODS: Female patients scheduled to undergo a TLH under general anesthesia at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital were included. Before the end of pneumoperitoneum, patients were laparoscopically administered an intraperitoneal infusion of 0.25% ropivacaine 40 ml (R group) or 0.25% ropivacaine combined with 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine 40 ml (RD group). The primary outcome was QoR-40, which was assessed before surgery and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative NRS scores, postoperative anesthetic dosage, the time to ambulation, urinary catheter removal, and anal exhaust. The incidence of dizziness, nausea, and vomiting was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 109 women were recruited. The RD group had higher QoR scores than the R group at 24 h after surgery (p < 0.05). Compared with the R group, NRS scores in the RD group decreased at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (all p < 0.05). In the RD group, the time to the first dosage of postoperative opioid was longer and the cumulative and effective times of PCA compression were less than those in the R group (all p < 0.05). Simultaneously, the time to ambulation (p = 0.033), anal exhaust (p = 0.002), and urethral catheter removal (p = 0.018) was shortened in the RD group. The RD group had a lower incidence of dizziness, nausea, and vomiting (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine improved the quality of recovery in patients undergoing TLH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000033209, Registration Date: May 24, 2020.

Effect of public square dancing combined with serotonin reuptake inhibitors on persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) in middle-aged and older women.

BACKGROUND: Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a functional vestibular disorder that causes chronic dizziness and limits daily activities. Although pharmacology, vestibular rehabilitation, and cognitive behavioral therapy have been proposed to have some efficacy, they have certain limitations. Some patients with PPPD report that public square dancing can effectively relieve the symptoms of dizziness and instability, and their mood improves. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of combining public square dancing with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs) on the subjective sensations of dizziness, balance enhancement, anxiety, and depressive symptom regulation in middle-aged and older women with PPPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, 124 patients diagnosed with PPPD were enrolled. Among them, 64 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (EG), where they received square dance training combined with serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The remaining 60 cases were randomly assigned to the control group (CG), where they received only serotonin reuptake inhibitors and did not participate in organized sports activities, allowing them freedom in their daily lives. Data from the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Active-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and Vestibular Disorder Activities of Daily Living Scale (VADL) were collected and compared at the beginning, 3 months, and 6 months of the trial to evaluate the effect of public square dancing on middle-aged and older women with PPPD. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the EG and CG before the trial. Compared with baseline measures, DHI, HADS, ABC, and VADL scores improved as the experiment progressed, and the improvements were more pronounced in the EG. CONCLUSION: Public square dancing combined with serotonin reuptake inhibitors has a positive impact on the subjective sensations of dizziness, balance enhancement, anxiety, and depressive symptom regulation in middle-aged and older women with PPPD.

Effects of high-dose betahistine on intractable dizziness in patients with uncompensated unilateral vestibulopathy.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we examined the effects of high-dose betahistine on dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores in patients with unilateral vestibulopathy. METHODS: An uncontrolled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial was conducted. Fifteen patients with unilateral vestibulopathy, such as vestibular neuritis, who complained of intractable dizziness for more than three months were enrolled. Initially, all patients were orally administered betahistine at a dose of 36 mg/day for four weeks, which is the standard dose and dosing period for the treatment of dizziness in Japan. The patients were then administered betahistine at a double dose of 72 mg/day for four weeks. Six patients who became aware of the benefits of high-dose betahistine were further administered betahistine at 72 mg/day for an additional 12 weeks (a total of 16 weeks). Perceived disability due to dizziness was assessed by DHI scores. RESULTS: In all 15 patients, short-term administration with high-dose (72 mg/day) betahistine for four weeks, but not low-dose betahistine (36 mg/day) for four weeks significantly decreased DHI scores. In particular, in six responding patients with self-reported benefits after short-term administration with high-dose betahistine, long-term administration with high-dose betahistine for 16 weeks further significantly decreased DHI scores. However, DHI scores of the remaining nine non-responding patients were not changed after short-term administration with high-dose betahistine for four weeks. CONCLUSION: Short-term administration with the standard dose and dosing period of betahistine did not improve DHI scores in the enrolled patients, indicating that they were not compensated for unilateral vestibulopathy with intractable dizziness. The present findings suggest that long-term administration with high-dose betahistine facilitates vestibular compensation to improve intractable dizziness in some, but not all patients with uncompensated unilateral vestibulopathy.

Comparison of the effectiveness, safety, and costs of anti-Parkinson drugs: A multiple-center retrospective study.

AIMS: This study aimed to systematically compare the effectiveness, safety, and costs of different anti-Parkinson drugs (APDs). METHODS: This is a multi-center study that retrospectively analyzed the data of 8420 outpatients with PD from 2014 to 2019 across 30 tertiary hospitals in China. The effectiveness was evaluated by changes in total dosages of APDs, normalized by levodopa equivalent dose (LED) and presented as ΔLEDs; levodopa equivalent dose cost (LEDc) represented the daily cost of APDs; and newly added diagnostics were represented as APDs-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 384 patients with eligible medical records for three consecutive years were enrolled. Patients treated with carbidopa/levodopa or levodopa/benserazide had significantly lower mean ΔLEDs than other groups (p < 0.01), followed by pramipexole and selegiline. The piribedil group had the highest ΔLEDs, with mean differences of 112.56-355.04 mg compared to other groups (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, LEDc in the levodopa/benserazide, carbidopa/levodopa, and piribedil groups were significantly lower than those in pramipexole or selegiline groups ($0.088-0.135/day for levodopa/benserazide; $0.070-0.126/day for carbidopa/levodopa; $0.112-0.138/day for piribedil; $0.290-0.332/day for pramipexole; $0.229-0.544/day for selegiline; p < 0.01). Patients with piribedil had more adverse events, with an incidence rate of 35.7%, followed by levodopa/benserazide (25.6%), selegiline (23.5%), carbidopa/levodopa (23.3%), and pramipexole (16.4%). Pramipexole showed a lower incidence rate of adverse events than piribedil, including neuropsychiatric symptoms (p = 0.006), headache/dizziness (p = 0.016), and gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Carbidopa/levodopa or levodopa/benserazide might exhibit better clinical improvement with less medical cost, while piribedil presented less clinical improvement but a higher risk of headache/dizziness, gastrointestinal, and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Impact of Sex and Genetic Variation in Relevant Pharmacogenes on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Valsartan, Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide.

Drug combination therapy is the most common pharmacological strategy for hypertension management. No pharmacogenetic biomarkers for guiding hypertension pharmacotherapy are available to date. The study population were 64 volunteers from seven bioequivalence trials investigating formulations with valsartan, olmesartan and/or hydrochlorothiazide. Every volunteer was genotyped for 10 genetic variants in different transporters' genes. Additionally, valsartan-treated volunteers were genotyped for 29 genetic variants in genes encoding for different metabolizing enzymes. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration (Cmax) and time to reach it (tmax), the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and blood pressure measurements were analyzed as a function of pharmacogenetic and demographic parameters. Individuals with the ABCB1 rs1045642 T/T genotype were associated with a higher valsartan tmax compared to those with T/G and G/G genotypes (p < 0.001, ß = 0.821, R2 = 0.459) and with a tendency toward a higher postural dizziness incidence (11.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.070). A higher hydrochlorothiazide dose/weight (DW)-corrected area under the curve (AUC∞/DW) was observed in SLC22A1 rs34059508 G/A volunteers compared to G/G volunteers (p = 0.050, ß = 1047.35, R2 = 0.051), and a tendency toward a higher postural dizziness incidence (50% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.063). Sex impacted valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide pharmacokinetics, showing a lower exposure in women, whereas no significant differences were found for olmesartan pharmacokinetics.

Amiodarone-Induced Nystagmus and Ataxia: Case Report and Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic drug with a significant adverse effect profile, including neurotoxicity. While ataxia, neuropathy, and tremors are more commonly seen forms of amiodarone neurotoxicity, very few cases of nystagmus are reported. We report the case of an 86-year-old man who presented with abrupt-onset ataxia, dizziness, and inability to ambulate, 10 days after initiating amiodarone for atrial fibrillation. His examination revealed gaze-evoked nystagmus along with features of cerebellar dysfunction. After excluding other etiologies, amiodarone was stopped. His nystagmus resolved, and his ataxia improved within 48 h of stopping amiodarone. Due to the rarity of this drug-induced adverse effect, we performed a systematic review of available case reports in the literature (PubMed and Scopus) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and presented our findings. Nystagmus is a rarely reported adverse effect of amiodarone, which can occur within days to months of starting the medication. Treatment includes stopping the drug and monitoring for resolution of nystagmus.

Analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a promising regional technique for analgesia in thoracic surgery. Till now, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the effectiveness of SAPB for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but the sample sizes were small and conclusions remained in controversy. Therefore, we conducted the present systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: RCTs evaluating the analgesic performance of SAPB, comparing to control methods (no block, placebo or local infiltration anesthesia), in patients undergoing VATS were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2022. Mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated for postoperative pain scores at various time points, postoperative opioid consumption and length of hospital stay. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95%CI were calculated for the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and dizziness. A random-effect model was applied. RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs (837 participants) were finally included. Compared to control group, SAPB had significant reductions of postoperative pain scores at 2 h (MD = -1.58, 95%CI: -1.86 to -1.31, P < 0.001), 6 h (MD = -2.06, 95%CI: -2.74 to -1.38, P < 0.001), 12 h (MD = -1.72, 95%CI: -2.30 to -1.14, P < 0.001) and 24 h (MD = -1.03, 95%CI: -1.55 to -0.52, P < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, SAPB conferred a fewer postoperative opioid consumption (MD = -7.3 mg of intravenous morphine equivalent, 95%CI: -10.16 to -4.44, P < 0.001) and lower incidence of PONV (RR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.41 to 0.77, P < 0.001). There was no difference between both groups regarding length of hospital stay and risk of dizziness. CONCLUSION: SAPB shows an excellent performance in postoperative pain management in patients undergoing VATS by reducing pains scores, postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of PONV. However, due to huge heterogeneity, more well-designed, large-scale RCTs are needed to verify these findings in the future.

The processing methods, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Gastrodia elata Bl.: A comprehensive review.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Gastrodia elata Bl. (GE) is one of the rare Chinese medicinal materials with a long history of medicine and cooking. It consists of a variety of chemical components, including aromatic compounds, organic acids and esters, steroids, saccharides and their glycosides, etc., which has medicinal and edible value, and is widely used in various diseases, such as infantile convulsions, epilepsy, tetanus, headache, dizziness, limb numbness, rheumatism and arthralgia. It is also commonly used in health care products and cosmetics. Thus, its chemical composition and pharmacological activity have attracted more and more attention from the scientific community. AIM: In this review, the processing methods, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities of GE were comprehensively and systematically summarized, which provides a valuable reference for researchers the rational of GE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of published literature and classic books from 1958 to 2023 was conducted using online bibliographic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, ACS, Science Direct Database, CNKI and others to identify original research related to GE, its processing methods, active ingredients and pharmacological activities. RESULTS: GE is traditionally used to treat infantile convulsion, epilepsy, tetanus, headache, dizziness, limb numbness, rheumatism and arthralgia. To date, more than 435 chemical constituents were identified from GE including 276 chemical constituents, 72 volatile components and 87 synthetic compounds, which are the primary bioactive compounds. In addition, there are other biological components, such as organic acids and esters, steroids and adenosines. These extracts have nervous system and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular system activities such as sedative-hypnotic, anticonvulsant, antiepileptic, neuron protection and regeneration, analgesia, antidepressant, antihypertensive, antidiabetic, antiplatelet aggregation, anti-inflammatory, etc. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the processing methods, chemical composition, pharmacological activities, and molecular mechanism of GE over the last 66 years, which provides a valuable reference for researchers to understand its research status and applications.

Establishing Core Symptoms of Acute Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Withdrawal: Results from an International Survey of Online Peer-Support Communities.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) antidepressants are commonly associated with withdrawal reactions. The Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) checklist has been considered the gold standard research and screening tool for SRI withdrawal but has several limitations, including its length, lack of specificity, and omission of baseline symptom and symptom severity scores, making it impractical for use in clinical or research settings. We investigated the prevalence and severity of common SRI withdrawal symptoms to determine whether a very small subset of symptoms can capture most occurrences of SRI withdrawal. METHODS: We surveyed 344 members of online peer-support communities aged 18-65, reporting withdrawal symptoms after chronic SRI treatment. The severity of nine common withdrawal symptoms was evaluated at baseline and during the withdrawal period. RESULTS: Dizziness, brain zaps, irritability/agitation, and anxiety/nervousness demonstrated the largest increase in severity during withdrawal relative to baseline. Nearly all (97.7%) of the 344 subjects and all (100%) 153 subjects with relatively low baseline symptom scores (total<5) reported a worsening of one of these four symptoms. The presence of a baseline anxiety disorder did not affect rates of withdrawal-emergent anxiety/nervousness. CONCLUSION: Nearly all surveyed subjects reported worsening either of dizziness, brain zaps, irritability/agitation, or anxiety/nervousness in acute withdrawal. A screening test incorporating these four core symptoms may be sufficiently sensitive to rule out SRI withdrawal and may be valuable in clinical and research settings. Incorporating withdrawal symptom severity may further enhance specificity.

Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy on the prognosis of patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome and neurological complications.

Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been reported to exert a beneficial effect on severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) patients with neurological complications. However, in clinical practice, the standard regime is unclear and there is a lack of evidence from large-scale studies. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted to determine the influence of IVIG dosage and duration on SFTS patients with neurological complications. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and laboratory parameters before and after IVIG treatment were measured. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed with the log-rank test according to the median IVIG dosage and IVIG duration. Besides, multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the independent factors and 28-day mortality in SFTS patients. Results: Overall, 36 patients (58.06%) survived, while 26 (41.9%) patients died. The median age of the included patients was 70 (55-75) years, and 46.8% (29/62) were male. A significantly higher clinical presentation of dizziness and headache was observed in the survival group. The IVIG duration in the survival group was longer than in the death group (P <0.05). Additionally, the IVIG dosage was higher in the survival group than in the death group, but there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.066). The mediating effect of IVIG duration was verified through the relationship between IVIG dosage and prognosis using the Sobel test. Univariate analysis revealed that IVIG dosage (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-1.00; P = 0.007) and IVIG duration (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.41-0.72; P <0.001) were significantly associated with risk of death. The multivariate analysis generated an adjusted HR value of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00; P = 0.012) for IVIG dosage and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09-0.78; P = 0.016) for dizziness and headache. Conclusion: Prolonged high-dose IVIG is beneficial to the 28-day prognosis in SFTS patients with neurological complications.

Opioid-sparing anesthesia with dexmedetomidine provides stable hemodynamic and short hospital stay in non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity score matching cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 agonist with anti-anxiety, sedative, and analgesic effects and causes a lesser degree of respiratory depression. We hypothesized that the use of dexmedetomidine in non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) may reduce opioid-related complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dyspnea, constipation, dizziness, skin itching, and cause minimal respiratory depression, and stable hemodynamic status. METHODS: Patients who underwent non-intubated VATS lung wedge resection with propofol combined with dexmedetomidine (group D) or alfentanil (group O) between December 2016 and May 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective propensity score matching cohort study. Intraoperative vital signs, arterial blood gas data, perioperative results and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Of 100 patients included in the study (group D, 50 and group O, 50 patients), group D had a significantly lower degree of decrement in the heart rate and the blood pressure than group O. Intraoperative one-lung arterial blood gas revealed lower pH and significant ETCO2. The common opioid-related side effects, including PONV, dyspnea, constipation, dizziness, and skin itching, all of which occurred more frequently in group O than in group D. Patients in group O had significantly longer postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay than group D, which might be due to opioid-related side effects postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The application of dexmedetomidine in non-intubated VATS resulted in a significant reduction in perioperative opioid-related complications and maintenance with acceptable hemodynamic performance. These clinical outcomes found in our retrospective study may enhance patient satisfaction and shorten the hospital stay.

Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of vestibular migraine: A prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular migraine is considered the most common cause of recurrent vertigo for which specific treatments are missing. Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide,, are effective in preventing migraine. Since CGRP is also detected in human cochlear and vestibular organs it may also play a role in vestibular physiology. METHODS: This is a prospective observational cohort study, aiming at evaluating the efficacy of erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab for the treatment of fifty vestibular migraine patients. We assessed mean monthly days with headache and dizziness/vestibular symptoms, pain intensity and migraine-related clinical burden occurring for 18 months. RESULTS: Response to treatment was excellent as 45 (90%) patients had at least a 50% reduction in vertigo frequency, 43 (86%) had at least a 50% reduction in headache frequency, and 40 (80%) a MIDAS reduction of at least 50%. Overall, 39 (78%) patients had a concomitant reduction of all three parameters. Mean monthly days with dizziness/vestibular symptoms showed an overall significant decrease from a mean of 10.3 ± 1.9 at baseline to 0.8 ± 0.3 days, difference 9.5 (CI 95% 3.6, 15.4; p < 0.001) after twelve months. CONCLUSION: We show that anti-CGRP mAbs may be effective in the treatment of Vestibular Migraine. Their use should be encouraged early in the disease course to allow for a better symptom control and quality of life improvement.

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability During a Clinical Trial and Open-Label Extension of Low-Sodium Oxybate in Participants with Narcolepsy with Cataplexy.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) were established in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 withdrawal study in adults with narcolepsy with cataplexy; however, the longer-term safety profile has not yet been examined. The aim of the current analysis was to assess the time of onset and duration of common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for LXB throughout the open-label optimized treatment and titration period (OLOTTP) and the stable dose period (SDP) portions of the main study, and the subsequent 24-week open-label extension (OLE). METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of LXB, TEAEs were evaluated during the 12-week OLOTTP, the 2-week SDP, and the subsequent 24-week OLE. Eligible participants were aged 18-70 years with a diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy. At study entry, participants were taking sodium oxybate (SXB) alone, SXB with other anticataplectics, other anticataplectics alone, or were anticataplectic-treatment naive; other anticataplectics were tapered and discontinued during the OLOTTP. All participants initiated LXB during week 1 of the OLOTTP, and their dose was individually titrated based on safety and efficacy. Following the main study period, participants entered the OLE after rescreening (re-entry) after discontinuing LXB treatment or directly after completing the main study (rollover). TEAEs were assessed in the safety population as of database lock. TEAE duration was defined as time from TEAE start date to end date (or end of SDP or OLE, if end date was unrecorded). RESULTS: The safety population included 201 participants (SXB alone, n = 52; SXB with other anticataplectics, n = 23; other anticataplectics alone, n = 36; anticataplectic-treatment naive, n = 90). During the OLOTTP/SDP, headache was the most common LXB-emergent TEAE overall (71 events; n = 42 (21%); median (range) duration = 1 (1-147) day), followed by nausea (31 events; n = 26 (13%); median (range) duration = 9 (1-54) days) and dizziness (26 events; n = 21 (10%); median (range) duration = 7 (1-117) days). Among the 74 participants in the OLE, the most commonly reported TEAEs were headache (14 events; n = 7, 9%; peak incidence month 3 (n = 5/72); median (range) duration = 1 (1‒25) day), dizziness (8 events; n = 5, 7%; peak incidence month 1 (n = 3/74); median (range) duration = 26 (1‒181) days), and nasopharyngitis (6 events; n = 6, 8%; peak incidence month 6 (n = 2/69); median (range) duration = 9 (1‒24) days). Overall, study discontinuations attributed to TEAEs were 21/65 (32%) during the OLOTTP and SDP and 3/7 (43%) during the OLE. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term analysis, the safety and tolerability profile of LXB was generally consistent with the known safety profile of SXB. During the OLOTTP and SDP, most TEAEs occurred early and were generally of short duration. TEAE prevalence decreased throughout the duration of the OLE; the most common TEAEs reported during the OLE were headache, dizziness, and nasopharyngitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03030599 (25 January 2017).

Low-sodium oxybate (LXB) is a medicine for narcolepsy. LXB treats daytime sleepiness and cataplexy (sudden muscle weakness). LXB is like sodium oxybate (SXB) but has 92% less sodium. This study looked at side effects in people taking LXB for many months. Three study periods were looked at in this report. In period 1, people could change their LXB dose for 12 weeks. This was to find their best dose. In period 2, people took that same best dose for 2 weeks. In period 3, some people kept taking LXB for 24 weeks. This was to study the longer-term effects. Everyone knew that they were taking LXB. During periods 1 and 2, the most common side effect was headache. Nausea and dizziness were also common. During period 3, headache was also the most common side effect. Dizziness and nasopharyngitis were also common. Nasopharyngitis is a cold in the nose and throat. In periods 1 and 2, most side effects happened early on. They also ended quickly. Fewer side effects happened in period 3. Among people leaving the study early, 32% left because of side effects during periods 1 and 2. During period 3, 43% left because of side effects. Overall, long-term side effects in people taking LXB were similar to those seen with SXB.

Prevention of Pregabalin-Related Side Effects Using Slow Dose Escalation Before Surgery: A Trial in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway.

BACKGROUND: The side effects of pregabalin likely occur after the first dose. We aimed to evaluate the effect of 75 milligrams (mg) of pregabalin prescribed as an initial dose with a slow dose escalation for primary total joint arthroplasty within the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, and twenty-nine were assigned to each group. Group 1 (G1) received pregabalin (37.5 mg) twice on the day before surgery, as well as pregabalin 75 mg two hours pre-operatively; Group 2 (G2) received none on the day before surgery and the same dose of pregabalin at two hours pre-operatively. The primary outcome was dizziness assessed by severity; secondary outcomes included nausea, vomiting, sedation, opioid consumption, independent transfer at six hours post-operatively, time to readiness for independent transfers, time to readiness for discharge, and pain. RESULTS: At two, four, and six hours post-operatively, the proportion of patients experiencing dizziness and nausea was significantly greater in G2 than in G1, and opioid consumption was significantly greater in G2 than in G1 (P = .012). The proportion of independent transfers at six hours post-operatively was significantly greater in G1 than in G2 (P = .010). The time to readiness for independent transfers was significantly shorter in G1 than in G2 (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Prescription of pregabalin 37.5 mg twice on the day before surgery was effective in reducing early postoperative dizziness and nausea after receiving pregabalin 75 mg two hours pre-operatively. It also promoted early independent transfers and reduced opioid consumption.

Novel methodology for the evaluation of symptoms reported by patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: Application of natural language processing to electronic medical records data.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding symptom patterns in atrial fibrillation (AF) can help in disease management. We report on the application of natural language processing (NLP) to electronic medical records (EMRs) to capture symptom reports in patients with newly diagnosed (incident) AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational retrospective study included adult patients with an index diagnosis of incident AF during January 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018, in the Optum datasets. The baseline and follow-up periods were 1 year before/after the index date, respectively. The primary objective was identification of the following predefined symptom reports: dyspnea or shortness of breath; syncope, presyncope, lightheadedness, or dizziness; chest pain; fatigue; and palpitations. In an exploratory analysis, the incidence rates of symptom reports and cardiovascular hospitalization were assessed in propensity-matched patient cohorts with incident AF receiving first-line dronedarone or sotalol. Among 30 447 patients with an index AF diagnosis, the NLP algorithm identified at least 1 predefined symptom in 9734 (31.9%) patients. The incidence rate of symptom reports was highest at 0-3 months post-diagnosis and lower at >3-6 and >6-12 months (pre-defined timepoints). Across all time periods, the most common symptoms were dyspnea or shortness of breath, followed by syncope, presyncope, lightheadedness, or dizziness. Similar temporal patterns of symptom reports were observed among patients with prescriptions for dronedarone or sotalol as first-line treatment. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that NLP can be applied to EMR data to characterize symptom reports in patients with incident AF, and the potential for these methods to inform comparative effectiveness.

A comparative study on the efficacy and safety of propofol combined with different doses of alfentanil in gastroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Propofol can be used alone or in combination with opioids during gastroscopy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol and different doses of alfentanil in patients undergoing gastroscopy. METHODS: A total of 300 patients undergoing sedative gastroscopy were randomly divided into four groups, and 0.9% saline (group A), 2 µg/kg alfentanil (group B), 3 µg/kg alfentanil (group C) or 4 µg/kg alfentanil (group D) were injected intravenously 1 min before the intravenous injection of 1.5 mg/kg propofol. If body movement and coughing occurred during the procedure, 0.5 mg/kg propofol would be administered intravenously. The primary outcome (awakening time) and secondary outcomes were recorded and analyzed, including hemodynamic changes, the incidences of body movement, coughing, hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, nausea and vomiting, drowsiness and dizziness. RESULTS: Patients in group C (7.0 [5.0 to 8.0] min) and group D (6.0 [5.0 to 7.0] min) woke up significantly earlier than those in group A (8.0 [6.0 to 10.0] min) (P < 0.001). Patients in group A experienced more body movement (P = 0.001) and coughing (P < 0.001) than the other groups. With the increasing dose of alfentanil, the morbidity of hypotension and bradycardia increased significantly (P = 0.001), while the incidence of dizziness decreased significantly (P = 0.037). The incidences of hypoxemia, tachycardia, drowsiness, nausea and vomiting were similar among the four groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous 1.5 mg/kg propofol combined with 3 µg/kg alfentanil is more suitable for patients undergoing gastroscopy, and the dose of alfentanil can be reduced according to the patient's actual physical condition.

Safety profile of lasmiditan in patients with migraine in an Asian population.

BACKGROUND: MONONOFU, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of Japanese patients with migraine, was pivotal for lasmiditan approval in Japan. However, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common than in global studies. A detailed safety profile would assist patient management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Safety assessments in MONONOFU included specific terms reported, frequency, severity, time to onset, duration, TEAE management, common TEAE risk factors, and TEAE-efficacy associations. RESULTS: Of 846 participants, 691 were assessed for safety. The proportion of participants reporting ≥1 TEAE was 23.4% with placebo and 70.9% with lasmiditan; 87.3% of TEAEs with lasmiditan were mild. The most frequent TEAEs with lasmiditan, dizziness (39.4%) and somnolence (19.3%), started ≤1 hour postdose (median durations: 2.5 and 3.3 hours, respectively). Higher lasmiditan dose, but not patient factors including body size, was identified as a clinically meaningful predictor of dizziness and somnolence. There were no adverse consequences of neurological TEAEs, which did not appear to adversely affect lasmiditan efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In the MONONOFU study, TEAEs appeared typically mild, transient, and self-limiting. Lasmiditan may represent a useful and well-tolerated acute treatment option for smaller (body mass index <30 kg/m2) patients and Asian patients with migraine.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic medication of vestibular migraine.

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular migraine is in the process of recognition as an individual clinical entity. At present, no guidelines exist for its management. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of available prophylactic medication. METHOD: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid and Embase databases. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were performed as well as risk of bias analysis. Meta-analysis for the mean differences for pre- and post-treatment impact based on Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Vertigo Symptom Scale were performed. Proportionate transformation meta-analysis for the successful event rate based on complete symptoms control was explored. RESULTS: Thirteen publications were identified: 3 were randomised, controlled trials and 10 were non-randomised, controlled trials. Propranolol and venlafaxine improved the Vertigo Symptom Scale score by -13.31 points and -4.16 points, respectively, and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory score by -32.24 and -21.24, respectively. Only propranolol achieved statistically significant impact with 60 per cent of patients achieving complete symptom control. CONCLUSION: Propranolol should be offered as the first-line treatment for vestibular migraine followed by venlafaxine. Amitriptyline, flunarizine and cinnarizine showed a trend for symptom improvement, but this was not statistically significant.