Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 50.225
Filter
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1201-1204, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829146

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the neuroendoscopy-assisted entire-process visualization technique (NEAEVT) of ventricular puncture for external ventricular drainage. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with cerebral hemorrhage who underwent unilateral ventricular puncture for external ventricular drainage in our hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to puncture technique: NEAEVT (30 patients), freehand (30 patients), and laser-navigation-assisted (28 patients). Operation time, drainage tube placement, and catheter-related hemorrhage incidence were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Mean operation time significantly differed between the freehand, NEAEVT, and laser-assisted groups (17.07, 18.37, and 34.04 min, respectively; P <0.0001). The position of the drainage tube was optimal or adequate in all patients of the NEAEVT group; optimal/adequate positioning was achieved in 80% of the freehand group. No catheter-related hemorrhage occurred in the NEAEVT group. Three freehand group patients and 2 laser-assisted group patients experienced catheter-related hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: The NEAEVT of ventricular puncture is accurate and achieves ventricular drainage without significantly increasing surgical trauma, operation time, or incidence of hemorrhage.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Ventricles , Drainage , Neuroendoscopy , Operative Time , Punctures , Humans , Male , Female , Drainage/methods , Middle Aged , Neuroendoscopy/methods , Aged , Cerebral Ventricles/surgery , Cerebral Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Cerebral Hemorrhage/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Ventriculostomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Rozhl Chir ; 103(2): 57-64, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697814

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is considered a respiratory virosis in its classic form, although it may present with heterogeneous symptoms. Thoracic complications occur in a small percentage of patients. Our objective was to evaluate existing experience with this disease and its thoracic manifestations and to determine the real-world status of care of these patients. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, single-institution analysis of a group of patients hospitalized with acute and post-acute COVID-19 pneumonia at Thomayer Hospital in Prague in the period from December 2020 to March 2022 and indicated for a thoracic surgical procedure. RESULTS: During the peak of COVID-19 pandemic, a thoracic intervention was performed in 46 admitted patients. Thoracic drainage (due to pneumothorax in 18 cases, fluidothorax in 3 cases, CT-guided lung abscess drainage in 2 cases, and CT-guided pneumatocele drainage in 2 cases) were the most common thoracic surgical procedures. Pleurectomy/decortication surgery was done in 10 cases. Additionally, 12 lung parenchyma-sparing resections were performed, while lobectomy was required in 2 cases. Resection of postintubation tracheal stenosis due to a severe course of COVID-19 pneumonia was indicated in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Even mild COVID-19 may cause a considerable morphological a functional alteration of the respiratory system. The most common complications of COVID-19 pneumonia that require a thoracic surgical intervention include pathologies associated with an air leak and accumulation of air (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema). The development of pulmonary necrosis, symptomatic bronchiectasis, pneumatocele, and bullous-fibrotic formations may result in pneumothorax, hemothorax or thoracic empyema in sporadic cases. An early thoracic surgical intervention to treat thoracic complications of COVID-19 pneumonia can improve the survival of COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Pneumothorax/surgery , Pneumothorax/etiology , Czech Republic , Drainage/methods
3.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 118, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It was typically necessary to place a closed thoracic drainage tube for drainage following esophageal cancer surgery. Recently, the extra use of thoracic mediastinal drainage after esophageal cancer surgery had also become more common. However, it had not yet been determined whether mediastinal drains could be used alone following esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 134 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery in our department between June 2020 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 34 patients received closed thoracic drainage (CTD), 58 patients received closed thoracic drainage combined with mediastinal drainage (CTD-MD), while 42 patients received postoperative mediastinal drainage (MD). The general condition, incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative NRS score, and postoperative anastomotic leakage were compared. The Mann-Whitney U tests, Welch's t tests, one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were applied. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative hyperthermia, peak leukocytes, total drainage, hospitalization days and postoperative pulmonary complications between MD group and the other two groups. Interestingly, patients in the MD group experienced significantly lower postoperative pain compared to the other two groups. Additionally, abnormal postoperative drainage fluid could be detected early in this group. Furthermore, there was no significant change in the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and the mortality rate of patients after the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in the MD group compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using mediastinal drain alone following esophageal cancer surgery was equally safe. Furthermore, it could substantially decrease postoperative pain, potentially replacing the closed thoracic drain in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Feasibility Studies , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Drainage/methods , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Esophagectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Aged , Mediastinum/surgery , Mediastinum/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Chest Tubes
4.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 69: 101898, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749577

ABSTRACT

While the endoscopic management of surgical complications like leaks, fistulas, and perforations is rapidly evolving, its core principles revolve around closure, drainage, and containment. Effectively managing these conditions relies on several factors, such as the underlying cause, chronicity of the lesion, tissue viability, co-morbidities, availability of devices, and expertise required to perform the endoscopy. In contrast to acute perforation, fistulas and leaks often demand a multimodal approach requiring more than one session to achieve the required results. Although the ultimate goal is complete resolution, these endoscopic interventions can provide clinical stability, enabling enteral feeding to lead to early hospital discharge or elective surgery. In this discussion, we emphasize the current state of knowledge and the prospective role of endoscopic interventions in managing surgical complications.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Drainage , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Treatment Outcome
5.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 297: 227-232, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691975

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the benefit of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) after colorectal surgery for endometriosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 215 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach in our center from February 2019 to July 2023. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis (1:1 ratio) identified two groups of patients with similar characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were then compared. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, 151 patients (70 %) had AD at the end of surgery and 64 (30 %) did not. Clinical characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between the groups after PSM. After PSM, AD was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a greater number of postoperative complications (p = 0.03). There were no differences for readmission, repeat surgery, or severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort of patients undergoing colorectal resection for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach, prophylactic AD was not found to be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Endometriosis , Postoperative Complications , Propensity Score , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Drainage/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(5)2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782428

ABSTRACT

A late middle-aged woman presented with a large, painful neck mass, with a history of rapid increase of size since 1 week and associated voice change, dyspnoea and odynophagia. Prior radiological investigation showed a multiloculated cystic mass in the left thyroid lobe. Fine needle aspiration revealed a predominant cluster of neutrophils. Blood investigations showed leucocytosis and high blood glucose levels suggestive of sepsis. The patient underwent surgical drainage of the thyroid abscess with total thyroidectomy which was managed through multidisciplinary teamwork between surgeons, haematologists, endocrinologists and anaesthesiologists. In addition, urine culture and thyroid pus culture both showed Escherichia coli growth suggestive of bacterial sepsis. The patient was treated successfully and made a complete recovery following surgery with normalisation of voice.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Sepsis , Thyroid Diseases , Thyroidectomy , Humans , Female , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/microbiology , Drainage/methods , Middle Aged , Thyroid Diseases/complications , Thyroid Diseases/diagnosis , Thyroid Diseases/microbiology , Thyroid Diseases/surgery , Abscess/microbiology , Abscess/diagnosis , Abscess/complications , Escherichia coli Infections/complications , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Escherichia coli Infections/therapy , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
7.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (5): 7-13, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785233

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure therapy in patients with peritonitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 127 patients with advanced secondary peritonitis between 2019 and 2022. All patients were divided into 2 groups. All ones underwent staged sanitation of the abdominal cavity. In the first group (n=76), re-laparotomies were accompanied by skin suture only and passive abdominal drainage. The second group included patients (n=51) with open abdominal cavity strategy and negative pressure therapy (vacuum-assisted laparostomy). We analyzed the number of surgeries, postoperative complications, duration of hospital-stay and mortality. RESULTS: In the second group, there were significantly lower morbidity, mean number of surgeries and hospital-stay. In addition, incidence of fascial closure of abdominal cavity was higher and mortality rate was lower in the same group. CONCLUSION: Vacuum-assisted laparostomy in patients with advanced peritonitis can reduce the number of secondary purulent complications and mortality, as well as increase the incidence of fascial closure of abdominal cavity. This approach reduces the number of surgical interventions and duration of in-hospital treatment.


Subject(s)
Laparotomy , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Peritonitis , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Male , Female , Peritonitis/surgery , Peritonitis/etiology , Middle Aged , Laparotomy/methods , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Abdominal Cavity/surgery , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Drainage/methods
8.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (5): 14-20, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785234

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the possibilities of minimally invasive methods for removing intra-abdominal calculi after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 5 patients with abdominal abscesses associated with infected calculi after previous laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care between 2020 and 2023. Mean age of patients was 55±12 years. There were 3 (60%) women and 2 (40%) men. All patients underwent minimally invasive treatment. RESULTS: Four patients (80%) underwent percutaneous drainage of abscess with subsequent replacement by larger drains and removal of calculi with endoscopic assistance. Event-free period after cholecystectomy was 44±32 months. One patient developed subhepatic abscess in 72 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This patient underwent transluminal removal of calculus through the duodenal wall. There was 1 calculus in 3 (60%) patients, 2 calculi in 1 (20%) patient and 3 calculi in 1 (20%) patient. CONCLUSION: The above-mentioned cases demonstrate successful minimally invasive interventions for symptomatic abdominal calculi after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minimally invasive treatment can reduce surgical aggression and accelerate rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Humans , Male , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Drainage/methods , Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Gallstones/surgery
9.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 233, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789643

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) is one of the most feared complications and source of litigation in spine surgery. Its occurrence rises up to 2% in minimally invasive spine surgery. In parts of the world where the population is aging, more fragile patients are expected to undergo degenerative spine surgery. Management of the SSEH includes emergent spine MRI, though some experts advocate for direct second-look surgery without imaging. Then, an urgent revision surgery under general anesthesia for hematoma evacuation is warranted. We report the case of a threatening SSEH in an 88-year-old patient after lumbar spine stenosis surgery. In order to spare a second general anesthesia for this fragile patient, we opted for a percutaneous ultra-sound guided drainage of the hematoma under local anesthesia as a first line treatment. The procedure was successful, we report an instant relief of his neurological deficit while performing the procedure. CONCLUSION: Ultra-sound guided percutaneous drainage of hyperacute SSEH successfully avoided a revision surgery. It spared a second general anesthesia in a fragile patient. This procedure could be an alternative first-line treatment of SSEH for fragile patients.


Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical , Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal , Lumbar Vertebrae , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Stenosis , Humans , Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal/etiology , Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Drainage/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 69: 101914, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749584

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) stands as a remarkable innovation in the realm of gastroenterology and its allied disciplines. EUS has evolved to such an extent that it now assumes a pivotal role in both diagnosis and therapeutics. In addition, it has developed as a tool which is also capable of addressing complications arising from endoscopic and surgical procedures. This minimally invasive technique combines endoscopy with high-frequency ultrasound, facilitating, high-resolution images of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent structures. Complications within the gastrointestinal tract, whether stemming from endoscopic or surgical procedures, frequently arise due to disruption in the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract wall. While these complications are usually promptly detected, there are instances where their onset is delayed. EUS plays a dual role in the management of these complications. Firstly, in its ability to assess and increasingly to definitively manage complications through drainage procedures. It is increasingly employed to manage post-surgical collections, abscesses biliary strictures and bleeding. Its high-resolution imaging capability allows precise real-time visualisation of these complications.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Endosonography , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Diseases/surgery , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods
11.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 181, 2024 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess the outcome of previously untreated patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who present to a cancer referral center with or without pre-existing trans-papillary biliary drainage. METHODS: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma presenting between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, were identified from a prospective surgical database and by a query of the institutional database. Of 237 patients identified, 106 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Clinical information was obtained from the Electronic Medical Record and imaging studies were reviewed in the Picture Archiving and Communication System. RESULTS: 73 of 106 patients (69%) presenting with a new diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent trans-papillary biliary drainage (65 endoscopic and 8 percutaneous) prior to presentation at our institution. 8 of the 73 patients with trans-papillary biliary drainage (11%) presented with and 5 developed cholangitis; all 13 (18%) required subsequent intervention; none of the patients without trans-papillary biliary drainage presented with or required drainage for cholangitis (p = 0.008). Requiring drainage for cholangitis was more likely to delay treatment (p = 0.012) and portended a poorer median overall survival (13.6 months, 95%CI [4.08, not reached)] vs. 20.6 months, 95%CI [18.34, 37.51] p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Trans-papillary biliary drainage for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma carries a risk of cholangitis and should be avoided when possible. Clinical and imaging findings of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma should prompt evaluation at a cancer referral center before any intervention. This would mitigate development of cholangitis necessitating additional drainage procedures, delaying treatment and potentially compromising survival.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Drainage , Klatskin Tumor , Humans , Male , Klatskin Tumor/surgery , Klatskin Tumor/mortality , Female , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Middle Aged , Cholangitis , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Retrospective Studies
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11610, 2024 05 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773218

ABSTRACT

Although endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) is more frequently used to manage walled-off necrosis (WON), there is still debate over how much time should pass between the initial stent placement and the first necrosectomy. This study aims to determine the effect of performing EN within different timings after placing the initial stent on clinical outcomes for WON. A retrospective study on infected WON patients compared an early necrosectomy within one week after the initial stent placement with a necrosectomy that was postponed after a week. The primary outcomes compared the rate of clinical success and the need for additional intervention after EN to achieve WON resolution. 77 patients were divided into early and postponed necrosectomy groups. The complete resolution of WON within six months of follow-up was attained in 73.7% and 74.3% of patients in both the early and postponed groups. The early group tended to a greater need for additional intervention after EN (26.8% early necrosectomy vs. 8.3% postponed necrosectomy, P = 0.036). Our study does not demonstrate that early necrosectomy is superior to postponed necrosectomy in terms of clinical success rate, total count of necrosectomy procedures, procedure-related complications, length of hospitalization and prognosis. Conversely, patients in the postponed group received fewer additional interventions.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgery , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/pathology , Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Endoscopy/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Necrosis , Drainage/methods
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11430, 2024 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769330

ABSTRACT

Liver abscess is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency. Prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous aspiration or drainage is therapeutic. The rational for using empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antimicrobials upfront instead of oral Fluoroquinolone or Cephalosporin is contentious. In this double blind randomized control clinical trial 69 participants received Ciprofloxacin (500 mg q 12 hourly) and 71 participants received Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) orally for 2 weeks. Both the group received oral Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess was done as per indication and followed-up for 8 weeks. Out of 140 participants, 89.3% (N = 125) achieved clinical cure, 59 (85.5%) in Ciprofloxacin group and 66 (93%) in Cefixime group (p = 0.154). Mean duration of antimicrobial therapy was 16.2 ± 4.3 days, 15.1 ± 4.5 days in Ciprofloxacin group and 16.0 ± 4.2 days in Cefixime group (p = 0.223). Total 15 (10.7%) participants had treatment failure, 10 (14.5%) in Ciprofloxacin group and 5 (7.0%) in Cefixime group (p = 0.154). The most common reason for treatment failure was need of prolong (> 4 weeks) antimicrobial therapy due to persistent hepatic collection requiring drainage, which was significantly (p = 0.036) higher in Ciprofloxacin (14.5%, N = 10) group, compared to the Cefixime (4.2%, N = 3) group. In conclusion, both, the Ciprofloxacin or Cefixime plus Metronidazole for duration of 2-3 weeks were efficacious as empirical oral antimicrobial regimen along with prompt percutaneous drainage or aspiration for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess with similar efficacy. Oral Cefixime was better than Ciprofloxacin in term of lesser chance of treatment failure due to persistent collection which is required to be investigated further in larger clinical trial.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov PRS ID: NCT03969758, 31/05/2019.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cefixime , Ciprofloxacin , Liver Abscess , Metronidazole , Humans , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Metronidazole/administration & dosage , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Cefixime/therapeutic use , Cefixime/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Liver Abscess/drug therapy , Liver Abscess/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drainage , Aged
14.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 174, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) is commonly used for preoperative drainage of localized perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (LPHC). This study retrospectively compared the utility of inside stent (IS) and conventional stent (CS) for preoperative EBS in patients with LPHC. METHODS: EBS was performed in 56 patients with LPHC. EBS involved the placement of a CS (n = 32) or IS (n = 24). Treatment outcomes were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: Preoperative recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) occurred in 23 patients (71.9%) in the CS group and 7 (29.2%) in the IS group, with a significant difference (p = 0.002). The time to RBO (TRBO) was significantly longer in IS than in CS (log-rank: p < 0.001). The number of stent replacements was significantly lower in IS than CS [0.38 (0-3) vs. 1.88 (0-8), respectively; p < 0.001]. Gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered to 26 patients (46.4%). Among patients who received NAC, TRBO was longer in IS than in CS group (log-rank: p < 0.001). The IS group had a significantly shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stay than the CS group (20.0 vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.024, and 33.5 vs. 41.5 days; p = 0.016).  Both the preoperative and the postoperative costs were significantly lower in the IS group than in the CS group (p = 0.049 and p = 0.0034, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with CS, IS for preoperative EBS in LPHC patients resulted in fewer complications and lower re-intervention rates. The fact that the IS group had shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stays and lower costs both preoperatively and postoperatively compared to the CS group may suggest that the use of IS has the potential to benefit not only the patient but also the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholestasis , Drainage , Klatskin Tumor , Preoperative Care , Stents , Humans , Male , Female , Drainage/methods , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Klatskin Tumor/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Cholestasis/surgery , Cholestasis/therapy , Cholestasis/etiology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Gemcitabine , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Aged, 80 and over , Adult
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 479, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) is a common hepatobiliary infection that has been shown to have an increasing incidence, with biliary surgery being identified as a trigger. Our aim was to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatments of PLA patients with and without a history of biliary surgery (BS). METHODS: The study included a total of 353 patients with PLA who received treatment at our hospital between January 2014 and February 2023. These patients were categorized into two groups: the BS group (n = 91) and the non-BS group (n = 262). In the BS group, according to the anastomosis method, they were further divided into bilioenteric anastomoses group (BEA, n = 22) and non-bilioenteric anastomoses group (non-BEA, n = 69). Clinical characteristics were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The percentage of PLA patients with BS history was 25.78%. The BS group exhibited elevated levels of TBIL and activated APTT abnormalities (P = 0.009 and P = 0.041, respectively). Within the BS group, the BEA subgroup had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001) and solitary abscesses (P = 0.008) compared to the non-BEA subgroup. Escherichia coli was more frequently detected in the BS group, as evidenced by positive pus cultures (P = 0.021). The BS group exhibited reduced treatment efficacy compared to those non-BS history (P = 0.020). Intriguingly, the BS group received a higher proportion of conservative treatment (45.05% vs. 21.76%), along with reduced utilization of surgical drainage (6.59% vs. 16.41%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BS history, especially those who have undergone BEA, have an increased susceptibility to PLA formation without affecting prognosis.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures , Liver Abscess, Pyogenic , Humans , Liver Abscess, Pyogenic/microbiology , Liver Abscess, Pyogenic/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Drainage
16.
Vestn Otorinolaringol ; 89(2): 15-20, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805458

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Optimization of the method of puncture treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABMS) through the development of original devices for drainage of the maxillary sinus (MS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Registration and comparative analysis of the results of puncture methods of treatment of 120 patients with ABMS using developed new original devices for drainage of MS with one channels and with two channels in comparison with the Kulikovsky's needle (KN) was carried out. Based on the results of the analysis, the effectiveness of the original devices was assessed. During the clinical study, patients were divided into two groups: in group I, patients underwent of the MS puncture using KN, in group II, using original devices. Groups I and II, depending on the absence or presence of a block of the natural anastomosis MS, was divided into subgroups A and B, respectively. After puncture of the MS, the pain syndrome was assessed by patients using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and by doctors - using Touch Visual Pain (TVP) scale. RESULTS: Our study showed that when puncturing the upper jaw with an original needle with one channels and with two channels, compared with the use of KN, there is a decrease in pain (the average VAS score was 1.5±0.3 and 1.7±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 0.9±0.2 and 1.8±0.3 points, respectively, the difference is significant, p≤0.05). Patients of subgroup IB were manipulated with two KN, patients of subgroup IIB manipulated using the original device with two channels without an additional needle (the average VAS score was 3.0±0.4 and 1.3±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 2.7±0.4 and 1.0±0.2 points, respectively, the difference is significant, p≤0.05). The doctors also assessed the devices used for puncture of the upper jaw. As a result of the study, the high efficiency and safety of using new original devices was established.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Sinusitis , Punctures , Humans , Maxillary Sinusitis/microbiology , Maxillary Sinusitis/therapy , Maxillary Sinusitis/diagnosis , Female , Male , Adult , Punctures/methods , Punctures/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Drainage/methods , Drainage/instrumentation , Pain Measurement/methods , Maxillary Sinus/microbiology , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Acute Disease , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis
17.
J Bras Pneumol ; 50(2): e20230318, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify how pediatric surgeons manage children with pneumonia and parapneumonic pleural effusion in Brazil. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey with 27 questions was applied to pediatric surgeons in Brazil through the Brazilian Association of Pediatric Surgery. The questionnaire had questions about type of treatment, exams, hospital structure, and epidemiological data. RESULTS: A total of 131 respondents completed the questionnaire. The mean age of respondents was 44 ± 11 years, and more than half (51%) had been practicing pediatric surgery for more than 10 years. The majority of respondents (33.6%) reported performing chest drainage and fibrinolysis when facing a case of fibrinopurulent parapneumonic pleural effusion. A preference for video-assisted thoracic surgery instead of chest drainage plus fibrinolysis was noted only in the Northeast region. CONCLUSIONS: Chest drainage plus fibrinolysis was the treatment adopted by most of the respondents in this Brazilian sample. There was a preference for large drains; in contrast, smaller drains were preferred by those who perform chest drainage plus fibrinolysis. Respondents would rather change treatment when facing treatment failure or in critically ill children.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Empyema, Pleural , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drainage/methods , Drainage/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Empyema, Pleural/therapy , Empyema, Pleural/surgery , Adult , Child , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data
18.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 34(3): 501-510, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796295

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) is a method of decompressing the pancreatic duct (PD) if unable to access the papilla or surgical anastomosis, particularly in nonsurgical candidates. The 2 types of EUS-PDD are EUS-assisted pancreatic rendezvous (EUS-PRV) and EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy (EUS-PG). EUS-PRV should be considered in patients with accessible papilla or anastomosis, while EUS-PG is a comparable alternative in surgically altered foregut anatomy. While technical and clinical successes range from 79% to 100%, adverse events occur in approximately 20%. A multidisciplinary approach that considers the patient's anatomy, clinical indication, and long-term goals should be discussed with surgical and interventional radiology colleagues.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Endosonography , Pancreatic Ducts , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Drainage/methods , Pancreatic Ducts/surgery , Pancreatic Ducts/diagnostic imaging , Endosonography/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Stents
19.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 34(3): 523-535, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796297

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has emerged as a popular alternative to percutaneous cholecystostomy and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for patients suffering from acute calculous cholecystitis who are at high risk for surgery. Multiple cohorts, meta-analyses, and a randomized controlled trial have shown that EUS-GBD has lower rates of recurrent cholecystitis and unplanned reinterventions, while achieving similar technical and clinical success rates than transpapillary cystic duct stenting. The essential steps, precautions in performing EUS-GBD and long-term management will be discussed in this article.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Endosonography , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Drainage/methods , Endosonography/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Cholecystitis, Acute/surgery , Gallbladder/surgery , Gallbladder/diagnostic imaging
20.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 34(3): 487-500, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796294

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (BD) is a minimally invasive procedure that allows for biliary access when conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is unsuccessful. The technique can be divided based on biliary access route: intrahepatic or extrahepatic, as well as on stenting approach: rendezvous approach (EUS-RV), antegrade placement, or transluminal (intra or extra hepatic) placement. There is no clear consensus on which approach is superior. Compared to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, EUS-BD offers lower rates of adverse events without the need for an external drain. Compared to conventional ERCP, EUS-BD shows comparable, and in some cases superior, outcomes related to technical success, clinical success, and adverse events.


Subject(s)
Drainage , Endosonography , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Drainage/methods , Drainage/instrumentation , Endosonography/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Stents , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Cholestasis/surgery , Cholestasis/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...