Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 872
Filter
1.
CNS Neurosci Ther ; 30(5): e14778, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801174

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) is a unique therapeutic target for pharmacoresistant epilepsy (PRE). As seizure-induced neuronal programmed death, parthanatos was rarely reported in PRE. Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), which has been implicated in parthanatos, shares a common cytoprotective function with SV2A. We aimed to investigate whether parthanatos participates in PRE and is mitigated by SV2A via AIF. METHODS: An intraperitoneal injection of lithium chloride-pilocarpine was used to establish an epileptic rat model, and phenytoin and phenobarbital sodium were utilized to select PRE and pharmacosensitive rats. The expression of SV2A was manipulated via lentivirus delivery into the hippocampus. Video surveillance was used to assess epileptic ethology. Biochemical tests were employed to test hippocampal tissues following a successful SV2A infection. Molecular dynamic calculations were used to simulate the interaction between SV2A and AIF. RESULTS: Parthanatos core index, PARP1, PAR, nuclear AIF and MIF, γ-H2AX, and TUNEL staining were all increased in PRE. SV2A is bound to AIF to form a stable complex, successfully inhibiting AIF and MIF nuclear translocation and parthanatos and consequently mitigating spontaneous recurrent seizures in PRE. Moreover, parthanatos deteriorated after the SV2A reduction. SIGNIFICANCE: SV2A protected hippocampal neurons and mitigated epileptic seizures by inhibiting parthanatos via binding to AIF in PRE.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis Inducing Factor , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Membrane Glycoproteins , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Animals , Rats , Apoptosis Inducing Factor/metabolism , Male , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/metabolism , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Hippocampus/metabolism , Hippocampus/drug effects , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology
2.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(5): e13802, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787305

ABSTRACT

A post hoc analysis of data from Asian patients included in the study BIA-2093-304 was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures. Part I was a randomized controlled trial, in which patients received ESL (800 or 1200 mg once daily [QD]) or placebo, assessed over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients completing Part I could enter two open-label extension periods (Part II, 1 year; Part III, ≥2 years), during which all received ESL (400-1600 mg QD). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included responder and seizure freedom rates. The safety population included 125, 92, and 23 Asian patients in Parts I, II, and III, respectively. Incidence of ESL-related TEAEs was 61.3%, 45.7%, and 17.4% during Parts I, II, and III, respectively. ESL-related TEAEs (most commonly, dizziness, somnolence, and headache) were consistent with ESL's known safety profile. During Part I, responder rates were higher with ESL 800 (41.7%) and 1200 mg QD (44.4%) versus placebo (32.6%), although not statistically significant. Seizure freedom rates with ESL 800 (5.5%) and 1200 mg QD (11.1%) were also higher versus placebo (0%) (p < 0.05 for ESL 1200 mg QD versus placebo). At the end of Part II, responder and seizure freedom rates were 60.3% and 14.7%, respectively. In summary, adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures were responsive to treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy and generally showed treatment tolerance well for up to 3 years. No new/unexpected safety findings were observed.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Asian People , Dibenzazepines , Humans , Dibenzazepines/adverse effects , Dibenzazepines/administration & dosage , Dibenzazepines/therapeutic use , Adult , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Seizures/drug therapy , Young Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Adolescent , Aged
3.
BMC Neurol ; 24(1): 141, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For approximately 30% of people with epilepsy, seizures are not well-controlled by anti-seizure medication (ASM). This condition, called treatment resistant epilepsy (TRE), is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and substantially impacts the quality of life of both the individual and their family. Non-responsiveness to ASMs leads many people with TRE to seek alternative therapies, such as cannabinoid-based medication, particularly cannabidiol (CBD), with or without medical or professional advice. This is due in part to widespread reporting in the media about the benefits of CBD for seizures in some forms of epilepsy. METHODS: Adults with TRE, opting to add CBD to their existing treatment regime, completed this prospective, observational, longitudinal, quasi-experimental, time-series study. We hypothesized that adjunctive CBD use would positively impact participants' quality of life and psychological well-being in comparison to a baseline period without CBD use. Participants were followed for a period of approximately six months - for approximately one month of baseline prior to the initiation of CBD use and approximately five months after the initiation of CBD use. Participants provided urine samples and completed behavioral questionnaires that assessed quality of life, anxiety/depression, and adverse events during baseline and at two times during CBD use. RESULTS: Complete case analyses (n = 10) showed a statistically significant improvement in quality of life, a statistically significant decrease in anxiety symptoms, and a statistically significant decrease in the experience of adverse events over time (p < 0.05). Improvements noted in the experience of depression symptoms did not reach statistical significance. Urinalysis revealed the majority of participants had no CBD/metabolites in their system at the beginning of the study, and confirmed the presence of CBD/metabolites in participants' urine after CBD was added to their treatment regime. Analysis of missing data using multiple imputation supported the findings of the complete case analysis. INTERPRETATION: For a small group of individuals with TRE of varying etiologies, adjunctive use of artisanal CBD was associated with improvements in the behavioral and psychological symptoms of TRE, as well as improved medication tolerability.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Cannabidiol , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Quality of Life , Humans , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Cannabidiol/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Adult , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/psychology , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Anxiety/drug therapy , Anxiety/psychology , Prospective Studies , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674283

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a major hurdle in epilepsy, which hinders clinical care, patients' management and treatment outcomes. DRE may partially result from genetic variants that alter proteins responsible for drug targets and drug transporters in the brain. We aimed to examine the relationship between SCN1A, GABRA1 and ABCB1 polymorphism and drug response in epilepsy children in Vietnam. Materials and Methods: In total, 213 children diagnosed with epilepsy were recruited in this study (101 were drug responsive and 112 were drug resistant). Sanger sequencing had been performed in order to detect six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) belonging to SCN1A (rs2298771, rs3812718, rs10188577), GABRA1 (rs2279020) and ABCB1 (rs1128503, rs1045642) in study group. The link between SNPs and drug response status was examined by the Chi-squared test or the Fisher's exact test. Results: Among six investigated SNPs, two SNPs showed significant difference between the responsive and the resistant group. Among those, heterozygous genotype of SCN1A rs2298771 (AG) were at higher frequency in the resistant patients compared with responsive patients, playing as risk factor of refractory epilepsy. Conversely, the heterozygous genotype of SCN1A rs3812718 (CT) was significantly lower in the resistant compared with the responsive group. No significant association was found between the remaining four SNPs and drug response. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significant association between the SCN1A genetic polymorphism which increased risk of drug-resistant epilepsy in Vietnamese epileptic children. This important finding further supports the underlying molecular mechanisms of SCN1A genetic variants in the pathogenesis of drug-resistant epilepsy in children.


Subject(s)
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B , Anticonvulsants , Epilepsy , NAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, GABA-A , Humans , NAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/genetics , Vietnam , Male , Female , Child , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/genetics , Child, Preschool , Epilepsy/genetics , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Receptors, GABA-A/genetics , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/genetics , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Infant , Genotype , Adolescent , Southeast Asian People
5.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 17(5-6): 423-432, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571335

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsies are a group of heterogeneous brain disorder, and antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay of treatment. Despite the availability of more than 30 drugs, at least one third of individuals with epilepsy are drug-resistant. This emphasizes the need for novel compounds that combine efficacy with improved tolerability. AREAS COVERED: A literature review on the pharmacology, efficacy, tolerability, and safety of azetukalner (XEN1101), a second-generation opener of neuronal potassium channels currently in Phase 3 development as ASM. EXPERT OPINION: Results from the phase 2b clinical trial strongly support the ongoing clinical development of azetukalner as a new ASM. Its pharmacokinetic properties support convenient once-daily dosing, eliminating the need for titration at initiation or tapering at the conclusion of treatment. CYP3A4 is the main enzyme involved in its metabolism and drug-drug interactions can affect the drug exposure. Preliminary analysis of an ongoing open-label study reveals no reported pigmentary abnormalities. The upcoming Phase 3 clinical trials are expected to provide further insight into the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of azetukalner in treating focal-onset and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Structurally distinct from currently marketed ASMs, azetukalner has the potential to be the only-in-class Kv7.2/7.3 opener on the market upon regulatory approval.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Drug Interactions , Epilepsy , Humans , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Animals , Drug Development , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/metabolism
6.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 102(6): 761-771, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653825

ABSTRACT

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by spontaneous and recurring seizures. It poses significant therapeutic challenges due to diverse etiology, pathobiology, and pharmacotherapy-resistant variants. The anticonvulsive effects of herbal leads with biocompatibility and toxicity considerations have attracted much interest, inspiring mechanistic analysis with the view of their use for engagement of new targets and combination with antiseizure pharmacotherapies. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the key molecular players and putative action mechanisms of the most common antiepileptic herbals demonstrated in tissue culture and preclinical models. From the review of the literature, it emerges that their effects are mediated via five distinct mechanisms: (1) reduction of membrane excitability through inhibition of cation channels, (2) improvement of mitochondrial functions with antioxidant effects, (3) enhancement in synaptic transmission mediated by GABAA receptors, (4) improvement of immune response with anti-inflammatory action, and (5) suppression of protein synthesis and metabolism. While some of the primary targets and action mechanisms of herbal anticonvulsants (1, 3) are shared with antiseizure pharmacotherapies, herbal leads also engage with distinct mechanisms (2, 4, and 5), suggesting new drug targets and opportunities for their integration with antiseizure medications. Addressing outstanding questions through research and in silico modeling should facilitate the future use of herbals as auxiliary therapy in epilepsy and guide the development of treatment of pharmacoresistant seizures through rigorous trials and regulatory approval.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Animals , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/metabolism , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/metabolism
7.
Epilepsia Open ; 9(3): 1051-1058, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) associated with high rates of seizure freedom and acceptable tolerability in patients with focal seizures. To achieve the optimal cenobamate dose for maximal potential effectiveness while avoiding or minimizing drug-related adverse events (AEs), the administration of cenobamate with other ASMs must be managed through concomitant ASM load reduction. A panel of Spanish epilepsy experts aimed to provide a Spanish consensus on how to adjust the dose of concomitant ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to improve the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS: A three-stage modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken, including six Spanish epileptologists with extensive experience using cenobamate. Based on current literature and their own expert opinion, the expert panel reached a consensus on when and how to adjust the dosage of concomitant ASMs during cenobamate titration. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that tailored titration and close follow-up are required to achieve the best efficacy and tolerability when initiating cenobamate in patients receiving concomitant ASMs. When concomitant clobazam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and sodium channel blockers are taken at high dosages, or when the patient is receiving two or more sodium channel blockers, dosages should be proactively lowered during the cenobamate titration period. Other concomitant ASMs should be reduced only if the patient reports a moderate/severe AE at any stage of the titration period. SIGNIFICANCE: Cenobamate is an effective ASM with a dose-dependent effect. To maximize effectiveness while maintaining the best tolerability profile, co-medication management is needed. The recommendations included herein provide practical guidance for proactive and reactive management of co-medication in cenobamate-treated patients with DRE and a high drug load. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy may continue to have seizures even after treatment with several different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Cenobamate is an ASM that can reduce seizures in these patients. In this study, six Spanish experts in epilepsy discussed the best way to use cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy. They provide practical guidance on when and how the dose of other ASMs might be adjusted to reduce side effects and optimize the use of cenobamate.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Carbamates , Chlorophenols , Consensus , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Carbamates/administration & dosage , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Spain , Chlorophenols/administration & dosage , Chlorophenols/therapeutic use , Adult , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy , Delphi Technique , Tetrazoles
8.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 25(5): 621-632, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606458

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ganaxolone has exhibited potential in managing seizures for epilepsy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess both the safety and efficacy of Ganaxolone for refractory epilepsy. METHODS: A thorough search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials involving patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and CDKL5 deficiency disorder. Efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted from the selected studies. Cochrane Review Manager was utilized for data synthesis and analysis, with risk ratios and mean differences calculated to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of Ganaxolone. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included a total of five randomized controlled trials. Ganaxolone exhibited significant efficacy in reducing seizure frequency by at least 50% from baseline [RR 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.98), p = 0.02]. However, the results did not reach significance for reducing 28-day seizure frequency [Mean Difference -1.45 (95% CI: -3.39, 0.49), p = 0.14]. Ganaxolone exhibited a positive safety profile, with no statistically significant occurrence of adverse events [RR 1.30 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.83), p = 0.12] and adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug [RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.42, 2.39), p = 0.99] compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Ganaxolone presents itself as a viable therapeutic option for refractory epilepsy, showing efficacy in reducing seizure frequency and exhibited a favorable safety profile. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023434883.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Pregnanolone/therapeutic use , Pregnanolone/analogs & derivatives , Pregnanolone/adverse effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
9.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(3): 119-131, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465404

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The landscape of epilepsy treatment has undergone a significant transformation with the emergence of cannabidiol as a potential therapeutic agent. Epidiolex, a pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified CBD, garnered significant attention not just for its therapeutic potential but also for being the first cannabis-derived medication to obtain approval from regulatory bodies. AREA COVERED: In this narrative review the authors explore the intricate landscape of CBD as an antiseizure medication, deepening into its pharmacological mechanisms and clinical trials involving various epileptic encephalopathies. This exploration serves as a comprehensive guide, shedding light on a compound that holds promise for individuals contending with the significant challenges of drug-resistant epilepsy. EXPERT OPINION: Rigorous studies highlight cannabidiol's efficacy, safety profile, and potential cognitive benefits, warranting further exploration for its approval in various drug-resistant epilepsy forms. As a promising therapeutic option, cannabidiol not only demonstrates efficacy in seizure control but also holds the potential for broader enhancements in the quality of life, especially for patients with epileptic encephalopathies.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Humans , Cannabidiol/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(5): 2084-2094, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel, which was used in a cohort of patients with refractory epilepsy for up to 3.5 years in a real-world setting in Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the medical records of patients treated with perampanel between March 13th, 2017, and September 6th, 2020, at neurology clinics at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC), Riyadh and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, was collected. The Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) scale was also used to measure the adverse effects of perampanel. RESULTS: Of the 75 included patients, 66.7% responded to perampanel at the last follow-up, including 22.7% seizure-free for at least the last six months, and 44% of patients responded with a ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. The overall incidence of adverse effects that led to perampanel discontinuation was 13.3%; the most common adverse effect was aggressive behavior followed by sedation. Pre-existing psychiatric comorbidity was significantly associated with the incidence of psychiatric and behavioral adverse effects on perampanel (p = 0.0206). The mean score of LEAP was 40. The most frequently rated adverse effects in LEAP were "feelings of anger and aggression to others", "nervousness and/or agitation" and "sleepiness". The efficacy and tolerability of perampanel were dose-dependent. Dose 6 mg/day was the most frequently used dose that was taken by about one-third of patients at their last visit. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel was effective as an adjunctive treatment for intractable seizures, with a responder rate of 66.7%. The long-term tolerability of perampanel was generally good. Aggressive behavior was the most common reason for perampanel discontinuation. Patients should be counseled and monitored for these adverse effects, particularly those with a history of previous psychiatric and behavioral problems.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Nitriles , Humans , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Pyridones/adverse effects , Emotions
11.
Neurotherapeutics ; 21(3): e00345, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490875

ABSTRACT

Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n â€‹= â€‹95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n â€‹= â€‹48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P â€‹< â€‹0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P â€‹< â€‹0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR â€‹= â€‹0.67; adjusted P â€‹= â€‹0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epilepsies, Partial , Lamotrigine , Humans , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Adult , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Lamotrigine/administration & dosage , Lamotrigine/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Longitudinal Studies , Treatment Outcome , Topiramate/administration & dosage , Topiramate/therapeutic use , Valproic Acid/administration & dosage , Valproic Acid/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Adolescent
12.
Neurotherapeutics ; 21(3): e00344, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521667

ABSTRACT

In the landscape of paediatric epilepsy treatment, over 20 anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have gained approval from Drug Regulatory Agencies, each delineating clear indications. However, the complexity of managing drug-resistant epilepsy often necessitates the concurrent use of multiple medications. This therapeutic challenge highlights a notable gap: the absence of standardized guidelines, compelling clinicians to rely on empirical clinical experience when selecting combination therapies. This comprehensive review aims to explore current evidence elucidating the preferential utilization of specific ASMs or their combinations, with a primary emphasis on pharmacodynamic considerations. The fundamental objective underlying rational polytherapy is the strategic combination of medications, harnessing diverse mechanisms of action to optimize efficacy while mitigating shared side effects. Moreover, the intricate interplay between epilepsy and comorbidities partly may influence the treatment selection process. Despite advancements, unresolved queries persist, notably concerning the mechanisms underpinning drug resistance and the paradoxical exacerbation of seizures. By synthesizing existing evidence and addressing pertinent unresolved issues, this review aims to contribute to the evolving landscape of paediatric epilepsy treatment strategies, paving the way for more informed and efficacious therapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Epilepsy , Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Child , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy
13.
Epilepsia ; 65(5): 1203-1223, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430119

ABSTRACT

Several pieces of evidence suggest immune dysregulation could trigger the onset and modulate sequelae of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Consensus-driven recommendations have been established to guide the initiation of first- and second-line immunotherapies in these patients. Here, we review the literature to date on second-line immunotherapy for NORSE/FIRES, presenting results from 28 case reports and series describing the use of anakinra, tocilizumab, or intrathecal dexamethasone in 75 patients with NORSE. Among them, 52 patients were managed with anakinra, 21 with tocilizumab, and eight with intrathecal dexamethasone. Most had elevated serum or cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels at treatment initiation. Treatments were predominantly initiated during the acute phase of the disease (92%) and resulted, within the first 2 weeks, in seizure control for up to 73% of patients with anakinra, 70% with tocilizumab, and 50% with intrathecal dexamethasone. Cytokine levels decreased after treatment for most patients. Anakinra and intrathecal dexamethasone were mainly initiated in children with FIRES, whereas tocilizumab was more frequently prescribed for adults, with or without a prior febrile infection. There was no clear correlation between the response to treatment and the time to initiate the treatment. Most patients experienced long-term disability and drug-resistant post-NORSE epilepsy. Initiation of second-line immunotherapies during status epilepticus (SE) had no clear effect on the emergence of post-NORSE epilepsy or long-term functional outcomes. In a small number of cases, the initiation of anakinra or tocilizumab several years after SE onset resulted in a reduction of seizure frequency for 67% of patients. These data highlight the potential utility of anakinra, tocilizumab, and intrathecal dexamethasone in patients with NORSE. There continues to be interest in the utilization of early cytokine measurements to guide treatment selection and response. Prospective studies are necessary to understand the role of early immunomodulation and its associations with epilepsy and functional outcomes.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein , Status Epilepticus , Humans , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy , Status Epilepticus/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/immunology , Adult , Female , Male , Child
14.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 180(4): 271-289, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461125

ABSTRACT

The ILAE's Task Force on Nosology and Definitions revised in 2022 its definition of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), the most common idiopathic generalized epilepsy disorder, but this definition may well change again in the future. Although good drug response could almost be a diagnostic criterion for JME, drug resistance (DR) is observed in up to a third of patients. It is important to distinguish this from pseudoresistance, which is often linked to psychosocial problems or psychiatric comorbidities. After summarizing these aspects and the various definitions applied to JME, the present review lists the risk factors for DR-JME that have been identified in numerous studies and meta-analyses. The factors most often cited are absence seizures, young age at onset, and catamenial seizures. By contrast, photosensitivity seems to favor good treatment response, at least in female patients. Current hypotheses on DR mechanisms in JME are based on studies of either simple (e.g., cortical excitability) or more complex (e.g., anatomical and functional connectivity) neurophysiological markers, bearing in mind that JME is regarded as a neural network disease. This research has revealed correlations between the intensity of some markers and DR, and above all shed light on the role of these markers in associated neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders in both patients and their siblings. Studies of neurotransmission have mainly pointed to impaired GABAergic inhibition. Genetic studies have generally been inconclusive. Increasing restrictions have been placed on the use of valproate, the standard antiseizure medication for this syndrome, owing to its teratogenic and developmental risks. Levetiracetam and lamotrigine are prescribed as alternatives, as is vagal nerve stimulation, and there are several other promising antiseizure drugs and neuromodulation methods. The development of better alternative treatments is continuing to take place alongside advances in our knowledge of JME, as we still have much to learn and understand.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile , Humans , Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile/diagnosis , Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile/drug therapy , Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile/physiopathology , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/diagnosis , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/etiology , Female , Risk Factors
15.
JAMA Neurol ; 81(5): 534-548, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466294

ABSTRACT

Importance: Multiple continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) are available for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). There is a paucity of data comparing the different types of CIVADs used for RSE. Objective: To systematically review and compare outcome measures associated with the initial CIVAD choice in RSE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Evidence Review: Data sources included English and non-English articles using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1994-June 2023) as well as manual search. Study selection included peer-reviewed studies of 5 or more patients and at least 1 patient older than 12 years with status epilepticus refractory to a benzodiazepine and at least 1 standard antiseizure medication, treated with continuously infused midazolam, ketamine, propofol, pentobarbital, or thiopental. Independent extraction of articles was performed using prespecified data items. The association between outcome variables and CIVAD was examined with an analysis of variance or χ2 test where appropriate. Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between outcome variables and CIVAD with etiology, change in mortality over time, electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (continuous vs intermittent), and treatment goal (seizure vs burst suppression) included as covariates. Risk of bias was addressed by listing the population and type of each study. Findings: A total of 66 studies with 1637 patients were included. Significant differences among CIVAD groups in short-term failure, hypotension, and CIVAD substitution during treatment were observed. Non-epilepsy-related RSE (vs epilepsy-related RSE) was associated with a higher rate of CIVAD substitution (60 of 120 [50.0%] vs 11 of 43 [25.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.44-7.11; P = .006) and mortality (98 of 227 [43.2%] vs 7 of 63 [11.1%]; OR, 17.0; 95% CI, 4.71-109.35; P < .001). Seizure suppression was associated with mortality (OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 1.77-39.23; P = .005), but only a small subgroup was available for analysis (seizure suppression: 17 of 22 [77.3%] from 3 publications vs burst suppression: 25 of 98 [25.5%] from 12 publications). CIVAD choice and EEG type were not predictors of mortality. Earlier publication year was associated with mortality, although the observation was no longer statistically significant after adjusting SEs for clustering. Conclusions and Relevance: Epilepsy-related RSE was associated with lower mortality compared with other RSE etiologies. A trend of decreasing mortality over time was observed, which may suggest an effect of advances in neurocritical care. The overall data are heterogeneous, which limits definitive conclusions on the choice of optimal initial CIVAD in RSE treatment.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Status Epilepticus , Humans , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage
16.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 2180, 2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467626

ABSTRACT

Epilepsy is a chronic and heterogenous disease characterized by recurrent unprovoked seizures, that are commonly resistant to antiseizure medications. This study applies a transcriptome network-based approach across epilepsies aiming to improve understanding of molecular disease pathobiology, recognize affected biological mechanisms and apply causal reasoning to identify therapeutic hypotheses. This study included the most common drug-resistant epilepsies (DREs), such as temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-HS), and mTOR pathway-related malformations of cortical development (mTORopathies). This systematic comparison characterized the global molecular signature of epilepsies, elucidating the key underlying mechanisms of disease pathology including neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity, brain extracellular matrix and energy metabolism. In addition, specific dysregulations in neuroinflammation and oligodendrocyte function were observed in TLE-HS and mTORopathies, respectively. The aforementioned mechanisms are proposed as molecular hallmarks of DRE with the identified upstream regulators offering opportunities for drug-target discovery and development.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe , Humans , Gene Regulatory Networks , Hippocampus/metabolism , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/drug therapy , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/genetics , Seizures/metabolism , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/genetics
17.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 180(4): 290-297, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508955

ABSTRACT

The 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification suggested that the term "genetic generalized epilepsies" (GGEs) should be used for the broad group of epilepsies with so-called "generalized" seizure types and "generalized" spike-wave activity on EEG, based on a presumed genetic etiology. Within this framework, idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) are described as a subset of GGEs and include only four epileptic syndromes: childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone. The recent 2022 ILAE definition of IGEs is based on the current state of knowledge and reflects a community consensus and is designed to evolve as knowledge advances. The term "frontiers of IGEs" refers to the actual limits of our understanding of these four syndromes. Indeed, among patients presenting with a syndrome compatible with the 2022 definition of IGEs, we still observe a significant proportion of patients presenting with specific clinical features, refractory seizures, or drug-resistant epilepsies. This leads to the discussion of the boundaries of IGEs and GGEs, or what is accepted within a clinical spectrum of a definite IGE. Here, we discuss several entities that have been described in the literature for many years and that may either constitute rare features of IGEs or a distinct differential diagnosis. Their recognition by clinicians may allow a more individualized approach and improve the management of patients presenting with such entities.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy, Generalized , Humans , Epilepsy, Generalized/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Generalized/physiopathology , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/diagnosis , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/physiopathology , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/etiology , Electroencephalography , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Child , Epilepsy, Absence/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Absence/physiopathology , Epilepsy, Absence/drug therapy
18.
Epilepsy Res ; 201: 107340, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442550

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychological testing is a mandatory component in the evaluation of drug resistant epilepsy. The results of testing may assist with both the localization of an epilepsy as well as assessment of surgical risk. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the neuropsychological performance of patients with epilepsy and functional seizures. We hypothesized that comorbid functional seizures could potentially influence neuropsychological test performance. Therefore, we evaluated whether there is a difference in the neuropsychological test results between drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures. METHOD: Neuropsychological test results were compared between 25 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy and 25 patients that also had documented functional seizures. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression models were used to both assess performance differences between the groups and to assess whether test results could be used to accurately identify which patients had comorbid functional seizures. RESULTS: Epilepsy patients with comorbid functional seizures performed significantly worse on the FAS Verbal Fluency Test compared to ES patients (p = 0.047). Digit Span Backwards (p = 0.10), Digit Span Forwards (p = 0.14) and Working Memory Index (p = 0.10) tended to be lower in the epilepsy and functional seizures group but was not statistically significant. A multiple logistic regression model using the results of four neuropsychological tests was able to identify patients with comorbid functional seizures with 83.33% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: There are appeared to be some differences in the neuropsychological performance among drug resistant epilepsy patients based on whether they have comorbid functional seizures. These findings may have relevant implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Humans , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/complications , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/epidemiology , Seizures/complications , Seizures/drug therapy , Seizures/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Logistic Models , Memory, Short-Term
19.
Epilepsia ; 65(4): 861-872, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314969

ABSTRACT

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder affecting over 70 million people worldwide. Although many patients achieve seizure control with anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), 30%-40% develop drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), where seizures persist despite adequate trials of AEDs. DRE is associated with reduced quality of life, increased mortality and morbidity, and greater socioeconomic challenges. The continued intractability of DRE has fueled exponential growth in research that aims to understand and treat this serious condition. However, synthesizing this vast and continuously expanding DRE literature to derive insights poses considerable difficulties for investigators and clinicians. Conventional review methods are often prolonged, hampering the timely application of findings. More-efficient approaches to analyze the voluminous research are needed. In this study, we utilize a natural language processing (NLP)-based topic modeling approach to examine the DRE publication landscape, uncovering key topics and trends. Documents were retrieved from Scopus, preprocessed, and modeled using BERTopic. This technique employs transformer models like BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) for contextual understanding, thereby enabling accurate topic categorization. Analysis revealed 18 distinct topics spanning various DRE research areas. The 10 most common topics, including "AEDs," "Neuromodulation Therapy," and "Genomics," were examined further. "Cannabidiol," "Functional Brain Mapping," and "Autoimmune Encephalitis" emerged as the hottest topics of the current decade, and were examined further. This NLP methodology provided valuable insights into the evolving DRE research landscape, revealing shifting priorities and declining interests. Moreover, we demonstrate an efficient approach to synthesizing and visualizing patterns within extensive literature that could be applied to other research fields.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Humans , Quality of Life , Natural Language Processing , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Seizures
20.
Epilepsia ; 65(4): e55-e60, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366848

ABSTRACT

High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are associated with normal brain function, but are also increasingly recognized as potential biomarkers of epileptogenic tissue. Considering the important role of interneuron activity in physiological HFO generation, we studied their modulation by midazolam (MDZ), an agonist of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA)-benzodiazepine receptors. Here, we analyzed 80 intracranial electrode contacts in amygdala and hippocampus of 13 patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy who had received MDZ for seizure termination during presurgical monitoring. Ripples (80-250 Hz) and fast ripples (FRs; 250-400 Hz) were compared before and after seizures with MDZ application, and according to their origin either within or outside the individual seizure onset zone (SOZ). We found that MDZ distinctly suppressed all HFOs (ripples and FRs), whereas the reduction of ripples was significantly less pronounced inside the SOZ compared to non-SOZ contacts. The rate of FRs inside the SOZ was less affected, especially in hippocampal contacts. In a few cases, even a marked increase of FRs following MDZ administration was seen. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, a significant HFO modulation in amygdala and hippocampus by MDZ, thus giving insights into the malfunction of GABA-mediated inhibition within epileptogenic areas and its role in HFO generation.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Humans , Midazolam/pharmacology , Electroencephalography/methods , Seizures , Hippocampus , Amygdala , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...