Duloxetine to prevent neuropathy in breast cancer patients under paclitaxel chemotherapy (a double-blind randomized trial).

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the major side effects and main reasons for affecting quality of life and dose reduction or even discontinuation of treatment in breast cancer patients. One of the most widely prescribed chemotherapies is the "taxanes." Considering that duloxetine has been used in treating neuropathies in recent years, this study aimed to investigate its effectiveness in preventing taxane-related neuropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial on 47 patients: 24 received a placebo and 23 received duloxetine at 30 mg daily in the first week following the injection of paclitaxel and 60 mg during the second week in each chemotherapy cycle. Patients objective (nerve conduction velocity (NCV) values) and subjective symptoms (visual analog scale including; neuropathy, paresthesia, pain, cold sensitivity, and numbness), the grades of the patients' neuropathy (calculated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5), and the presence of complications, before and after each chemotherapy cycle, were recorded. RESULTS: The placebo group experienced significantly higher occurrences of new neuropathy (8/23 in duloxetine vs 16/24 in placebo, P = 0.029) in NCV by tibial nerve latency (- 0.28% vs 19.87%, P = 0.006), tibial amplitude (4.40% vs - 10.88%, P = 0.049), and median nerve latency (8.72% vs 31.16%, P = 0.039); administration of duloxetine significantly reduced the scores of neuropathies (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.027), during chemotherapy, and 6 weeks later; however, no significant effect was observed on paresthesia, numbness, cold sensitivity, and other NCV measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel can cause neuropathy, lasting for a long time. Our study showed duloxetine is potentially an effective medication that can prevent subjective and objective neuropathy.

Efficacy of patient education and duloxetine, alone and in combination, for patients with multisystem functional somatic disorder: Study protocol for the EDULOX trial.

BACKGROUND: Multisystem functional somatic disorder is characterized by specific patterns of persistent physical symptoms with a complex biopsychosocial etiology. The disorder can lead to disability and personal suffering. Current treatment options require specialized settings, therefore patients often wait a long time to receive specific treatment. Patient education is considered important in most treatment programs, but has only been investigated sparsely as a stand-alone treatment. Pharmacological treatment is limited to tricyclic antidepressants in low doses with no antidepressant properties. Duloxetine has been found effective in single organ functional disorders. As a treatment for multisystem functional somatic disorder, duloxetine could reduce symptoms and treat comorbid anxiety and depression. It may furthermore enhance the effect of patient education through a hypothesized effect on cognitive functioning. The purpose of the EDULOX trial is to study psycho-EDUcation and duLOXetine alone and in combination. METHODS: This is a nested study design. The parent trial "EDULOX1" (n = 424) will compare a patient education program with enhanced usual care in an open-labelled, randomized controlled trial. In addition to this, eligible participants will furthermore receive either duloxetine or active placebo in the nested, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, "EDULOX2" (n = 212). Patient and clinician reported outcomes will be collected through questionnaires. CONCLUSION: The EDULOX trial may establish evidence for treatments applicable for the majority of patients with multisystem functional somatic disorder. If effective, duloxetine would be a more tolerable pharmacological treatment option that can target comorbid depression and anxiety, and potentially boost the effect of patient education. Trial registration number The study is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT06232473) and the internal list of research projects at the Region of Central Denmark (Case number 1-16-02-305-23). Approval from the Danish Medical Research Ethics Committees (Case number: 2212291) and the Danish Medicines Agency was obtained under EudraCT Number: 2022-002780-30 and Sponsor's Protocol Code Number: 9515.

A randomized comparative study of methylcobalamin, methylcobalamin plus pregabalin and methylcobalamin plus duloxetine in patients of painful diabetic neuropathy.

CONTEXT: Diabetic neuropathy affects 10.5%-32.2% of diabetic population posing clinical burden onto society. AIMS: We aimed to study the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of methylcobalamin, methylcobalamin plus pregabalin, and methylcobalamin plus duloxetine in patients of painful diabetic neuropathy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: It is a prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional, and parallel-group study done in patients of painful diabetic neuropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients were recruited and randomized to three study groups A, B, and C on methylcobalamin, methylcobalamin and pregabalin, and methylcobalamin and duloxetine, respectively. Patients were assessed at day 0 and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The tuning fork test, monofilament test, Thermal Sensitivity testing, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used to analyze vibration, pressure, thermal sensitivity, and pain. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Appropriate statistical methods were used to calculate P value (<0.05 - significant). RESULTS: The increase in number of patients with vibration perception is 11.6%, 37.9%, and 41.4%; pressure sensation is 7.6%, 37.9%, and 37.9%; and thermal sensitivity is 15.4%, 31.1%, and 37.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The decrease in VAS scores is 0.58 ± 0.14, 3.82 ± 0.05, and 4.17 ± 0.48 in Groups A, B, and C correspondingly. The adverse effects reported in Groups A, B, and C are 0%, 6.9%, and 10.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Group C is more efficacious when compared to Groups A and B while Group B is safer.

Simultaneous determination of duloxetine and 4-hydroxy duloxetine glucuronide in human plasma and back-conversion study.

Aim: To develop an LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of duloxetine and its metabolite, 4-hydroxy duloxetine glucuronide (4HDG) in human plasma and to investigate the potential back-conversion of 4HDG to duloxetine using stability study. Materials & methods: The LC-MS/MS method was validated according to the EMA and USFDA Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidelines and applied to pilot bioequivalence study. Results & conclusion: The method validation results were within the acceptance limits. The stability study and incurred sample reanalysis results ruled out the occurrence of back-conversion. The study highlighted the conduct of back-conversion test and the advantages of LC-MS/MS method in terms of sensitivity, specificity and low consumption of organic solvents.

Efficacy of duloxetine compared with opioid for postoperative pain control following total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of duloxetine as an alternative to opioid treatment for postoperative pain management following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Among 944 patients, 290 (30.7%) of patients received opioid or duloxetine for pain control for 6 weeks when the pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was greater than 4 out of 10 at the time of discharge. 121 patients in the Opioid group and 118 in the Duloxetine group were followed up for more than one year. Preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome measures (pain VAS score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) score were compared. The rate of further drug prescription (opioid or duloxetine) after 6 weeks of first prescription, 30-day readmission rate, and side effects were also investigated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pain VAS score, WOMAC Pain and Function score, at each time point between before and after surgery (all p>0.05). Fifteen (9.8%) patients in the opioid group and six (4.4%) patients in the duloxetine group were prescribed additional medication after first 6 weeks, showing no significant (p>0.05) difference in proportion. The 30-day readmission rate and the incidence of side effects were also similar (all p>0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Duloxetine and opioid did not show any difference in pain control, function, and side effects for up to one year after TKA. Although large-scale randomized controlled trials are still required to further confirm the side effects of duloxetine, it can be considered as an alternative to opioid for postoperative pain control following TKA.

Chronic Pain Produces Reversible Memory Deficits That Depend on Task Difficulty in Rats.

Cognitive impairment associated with chronic pain remains relatively poorly understood. Use of analgesic drugs and often present co-morbidities in patients can preclude conclusions of causative relationships between chronic pain and cognitive deficits. Here, the impact of pain resulting from spinal nerve ligation (SNL) injury in rats on short and long-term memory was assessed in the novel object recognition task. To understand if chronic pain seizes the limited cognitive resources that are available at any given time, task difficulty was varied by using either very different (ie, easy task) or similar (ie, difficult task) pairs of objects. Nerve-injured, male rats exhibited no short or long-term memory deficits under easy task conditions. However, unlike sham-operated controls, injured rats showed deficits in both short and long-term memory by failing to differentiate similar objects in the difficult task version. In SNL rats, duloxetine produced anti-allodynic effects and ameliorated long-term memory deficits in the difficult task suggesting benefits of pain relief possibly complemented by noradrenergic mediated cognitive enhancement. Together these data suggest chronic pain reversibly takes up a significant amount of limited cognitive resources, leaving sufficient available for easy, but not difficult, tasks. PERSPECTIVE: Memory deficits in a rat model of chronic pain were only seen when the cognitive load was high, ie, in a difficult task. Acute treatment with duloxetine was sufficient to relieve memory deficits, suggesting chronic pain induces memory deficits by seizing limited cognitive resources to the detriment of task-related stimuli.

Adverse Events and Perception of Benefit From Duloxetine for Treating Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias.

Background: Duloxetine effectively treats aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) in women with breast cancer but causes low-grade toxicities. This secondary analysis examines the relationship between adverse events (AE) and patient-perceived benefit, based on patient self-report that the treatment received was beneficial despite side effects. We hypothesized that duloxetine had a favorable effect on patient-perceived benefit, even among duloxetine-treated patients who experienced AEs and who, had they been treated with placebo, would have experienced none. Methods: Principal stratification was used to estimate the effect of duloxetine vs placebo on patient-perceived benefit and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Scale functional quality of life in the randomized, double-blind trial SWOG S1202 (n = 289). Subgroups of patients were defined by observed and counterfactual (what would have occurred had they been randomly assigned to the opposite study arm) experiences of AEs and the original primary outcome, reduction of average pain after 12 weeks of at least 2 points on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Results: Duloxetine caused an estimated 23.4% (95% credible interval [CI] = 13.4% to 33.7%) of patients to experience an AE even though they would have experienced none on placebo. Those patients remained more likely to report that their received treatment was beneficial than comparable patients assigned placebo (73.3% vs 41.8%, respectively; 95% CI for difference = 15.4 to 47.2 percentage points), although there was no statistically significant effect of duloxetine on functional quality of life (11.3 vs 9.0, 95% CI for difference = -2.2 to +6.7). Conclusion: Duloxetine resulted in higher patient-perceived benefit, even among those who would have an AE on duloxetine but none on placebo. Treatment of AIMSS with duloxetine should be considered for appropriate patients.

Diet and companionship modulate pain via a serotonergic mechanism.

Treatment of severe chronic and acute pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) remains challenging due to the interdependence of pain and psychosocial modulation. We examined whether modulation of the descending pain pathway through an enriched diet and companionship could alleviate pain in transgenic sickle mice. Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were reduced significantly with enriched diet and/or companionship. Upon withdrawal of both conditions, analgesic effects observed prior to withdrawal were diminished. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) was found to be increased in the spinal cords of mice provided both treatments. Additionally, 5-HT production improved at the rostral ventromedial medulla and 5-HT accumulated at the dorsal horn of the spinal cord of sickle mice, suggesting the involvement of the descending pain pathway in the analgesic response. Modulation of 5-HT and its effect on hyperalgesia was also investigated through pharmaceutical approaches. Duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, showed a similar anti-nociceptive effect as the combination of diet and companionship. Depletion of 5-HT through p-chlorophenylalanine attenuated the anti-hyperalgesic effect of enriched diet and companionship. More significantly, improved diet and companionship enhanced the efficacy of a sub-optimal dose of morphine for analgesia in sickle mice. These findings offer the potential to reduce opioid use without pharmacological interventions to develop effective pain management strategies.

Brain Targeting of Duloxetine HCL via Intranasal Delivery of Loaded Cubosomal Gel: In vitro Characterization, ex vivo Permeation, and in vivo Biodistribution Studies.

PURPOSE: Duloxetine (DLX) is dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor suffering from limited bioavailability (≈ 40%) due to extensive hepatic metabolism. This work aims to formulate and evaluate DLX intranasal thermoreversible cubosomal gels to enhance its bioavailability and ensure efficient brain targeting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cubo-gels were prepared by 33 central composite design with three independent factors, lipid ratio (glycerol monooleate: glycerol tripalmitate), Pluronic F127%, and Pluronic F68%. The prepared formulations were evaluated for their particle size (PS), gelling temperature (GT), entrapment efficiency (EE%), and in vitro release. The cubo-gel with the highest desirability (0.88) was chosen as the optimized formulation. DLX cubo-gel was evaluated using differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy. Cytotoxicity study, ex vivo permeation study and in vivo bio-distribution study were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brain targeting. RESULTS: The optimum cubo-gel was composed of 3.76 lipid ratio, 20% w/v PF127, and 5% w/v PF68. It had PS of 265.13 ± 9.85 nm, GT of 32 ± 0.05°C, EE% of 98.13 ± 0.50%, and showed controlled release behavior where 33% DLX was released within 6 hrs. The plain in situ cubo-gel had a significantly higher IC50 compared to DLX solution and DLX-loaded in situ cubo-gel. The ex vivo permeation study showed 1.27 enhancement in the drug permeation from DLX in situ cubo-gel. According to the in vivo bio-distribution study in plasma and brain, the intranasal DLX in situ cubo-gel showed a 1.96 fold improvement in brain bioavailability compared to the intranasal solution. Its BTE% and DTP% were 137.77 and 10.5, respectively, indicating efficient brain targeting after intranasal administration. CONCLUSION: Accordingly, intranasal DLX in situ cubo-gel can be considered as an innovative nano-carrier delivery system for bioavailability enhancement and efficient brain targeting of DLX to maximize its effect.

The safety of medications used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain, part 1 (antidepressants and antiepileptics): review of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral neuropathic pain is a highly disabling condition for patients and a challenge for neurologists and pain physicians. Although many drugs have been assessed in scientific studies, few have demonstrated a clear clinical efficacy against neuropathic pain. Moreover, the paucity of data regarding their safety raised the question on the benefit-risk ratio when used in patients experiencing peripheral neuropathies. AREAS COVERED: The authors conducted a review of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials to assess the safety of medications used to treat neuropathic pain. This first review was focused on antidepressant and antiepileptic medications. The aim was to provide an overview of the treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10%) and the serious adverse effects described in clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Among antiepileptics and antidepressants, duloxetine appeared to have the most detailed safety for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Over all studies, the most commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, and constipation. Only 20.0% of the included studies (N = 90) presented a good description of adverse effects that included a statistical comparison vers usa placebo group. Important methodological improvements must be made to improve the assessment of medication safety in future clinical trials.

Behavioral, Electrophysiological, and Histological Characterization of a New Rat Model for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain: Therapeutic Potential of Duloxetine and Allopregnanolone Concomitant Treatment.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial against breast cancer, but its toxicity causes painful chemotherapy-induced neuropathy which decreases seriously patients' quality of life. Development of effective therapy is crucial because current treatments are unsatisfactory. While animal models have previously been produced to test therapeutics against chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, neuropathic pain evoked by the frequently used neoadjuvant-chemotherapy involving sequentially epirubicin and docetaxel has never been modeled. Duloxetine, a serotonin/noradrenalin-reuptake inhibitor, is recommended against chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, but duloxetine exhibits controversial and adverse effects requiring its discontinuation. Here, we firstly produced and characterized a rat model for epirubicin-docetaxel induced painful neuropathy by using behavioral methods including the von Frey filament and the acetone tests that were combined with electrophysiological assessment of peripheral nerve functions and immunohistological analyzes. Using this model, we investigated the possibility to improve duloxetine efficacy and safety by combining its low doses (2 mg/kg/2 days) with the potent neuroprotector allopregnanolone (4 mg/kg/2 days). This concomitant therapy was more effective than separate duloxetine or allopregnanolone treatment to prevent epirubicin-docetaxel induced cold allodynia, mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia, peripheral nerve functional/electrophysiological, and histological alterations. Interestingly, duloxetine-allopregnanolone concomitant treatment (but not duloxetine) also prevented epirubicin-docetaxel induced Schwann cell dedifferentiation and related macrophage (CD11b/c-positive cells) infiltration in sciatic nerves. Altogether, our results suggest that duloxetine and allopregnanolone concomitant treatment may represent a promising therapeutic option to counteract efficiently painful neuropathy or epirubicin-docetaxel evoked peripheral nerve tissue damages and dysfunctions.

Evaluation of duloxetine and innovative pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence (DULOXING): Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant).

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of published studies about the combination of duloxetine and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The aim of our work will be to evaluate the effect of this intervention by assessing whether there is a change in the incontinence episode frequency (IEF), Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL), Patient Global Impression of Improvement score (PGI-I) and mean time between voids (MTBV). Combined therapy with duloxetine and PFMT will be compared to duloxetine treatment alone with respect to its efficacy and side effects. METHODS: This study will be a randomized intervention, parallel, multicenter study in collaboration with 45 urological outpatient clinics at the national level. Patients will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental and control groups using simple randomization according to odd and even numbers assigned sequentially to the patients at each clinic. The experimental intervention will be 12 weeks. The experimental group will receive oral treatment with duloxetine at a daily dose of 2 × 40 mg and will be required to perform innovative PFMT. The control group will receive the same oral duloxetine treatment (2 × 40 mg a day) but will not perform PMFT. Data will be collected from both groups before intervention and after the 12-week intervention is completed. DISCUSSION: The study protocol presents the starting points, design and randomization of an interventional multicenter study to monitor the effect of the combination of duloxetine with innovative PFMT compared to duloxetine treatment alone in women with SUI. This study may provide evidence of the efficacy of this combined treatment for SUI and highlight benefits associated with active approaches to treatment through exercise. REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.go NCT04140253. Protocol version 1.0. date 11.1.2019.

Duloxetine reverses the symptoms of overactive bladder co-existing with depression via the central pathways.

Though the association between overactive bladder (OAB) and depression was noticed years ago, the pharmaceutical market does not offer one universal drug that would cure both conditions at the same time. The main goal of our present experiments was to determine whether a 14-day administration of solifenacin (0.03 mg/kg/day), mirabegron (1 mg/kg/day), or duloxetine (1 mg/kg/day) would reverse detrusor overactivity and depression-like signs in female Wistar rats subjected to corticosterone treatment. Surgical procedures, cystometric studies, biochemical analyses, and the forced swim test were performed according to published literature. After 14 days of exposure to corticosterone (20 mg/kg/day, subcutaneously), the tested animals presented symptoms of depression, detrusor overactivity, inflammation, and disturbances in neurotrophic factors. The obtained results demonstrated that solifenacin and mirabegron act mainly via peripheral pathways in OAB, whereas the central pathways are responsible for the effects of duloxetine. 72 h after discontinuation of duloxetine treatment, positive changes in the corticosterone-induced depression, detrusor overactivity, and inflammation were observed. Duloxetine seems to have a potential to become a new treatment option for patients with OAB co-existing with depression.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and its treatment: an NIH Collaboratory study of claims data.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a disabling complication of many chemotherapies. We investigated the feasibility of using health plan claims and administrative data to identify CIPN occurrence by comparing patients who received neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic chemotherapies. METHODS: The sample included over 53,000,000 patients from two regional and one national insurer in the USA (> 400,000 exposed to chemotherapy). Peripheral neuropathy was identified using a broad definition (definition 1) and a specific definition (i.e., drug-induced polyneuropathy code) (definition 2). RESULTS: CIPN incidence as measured by definition 1 within 6 months of chemotherapy initiation was 18.1% and 6.2% for patients who received neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic chemotherapy, respectively (relative risk neurotoxic vs. non-neurotoxic (RR), 2.93 (95% CI, 2.87-2.98)). For definition 2, these incidences were 3.6% and 0.1% (RR, 25.2 (95% CI, 22.8-27.8)). The incidences of new analgesic prescriptions for neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic groups were as follows: gabapentin, 7.1%/1.7%; pregabalin, 0.69%/0.31%; and duloxetine, 0.78%/0.76%. The incidence of CIPN as defined by definitions 1 and 2 was low compared with that of published research studies, but the relative risk of CIPN among patients who received neurotoxic chemotherapies compared with those who received non-neurotoxic chemotherapies was high using definition 2. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that as used currently by clinicians, administrative codes likely underestimate CIPN incidence. Thus, studies using administrative data to estimate CIPN incidence are not currently feasible. However, the drug-induced polyneuropathy code is a specific indicator of CIPN in administrative data and may be useful for investigating predictors or potentially preventive therapies of CIPN.

Effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity across different levels of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: a University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the consistency of vortioxetine's effects on functional capacity in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and self-reported cognitive symptoms at different levels of functional impairment.Methods: An exploratory analysis of data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study (NCT01564862) involving 529 patients with moderate to severe MDD treated once-daily with vortioxetine 10/20 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks. Analysis of the University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) composite scores stratified patients into subgroups by baseline functional impairment and assessed clinically important differences using several cutoffs for change from baseline (CFB) (least-square means) in UPSA composite score. A path analysis was also conducted to determine the proportion of direct versus indirect effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity.Results: Vortioxetine significantly separated from placebo across different baseline levels of functional impairment, particularly at the ≤70 cutoff (mean difference = 5.9, 95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.4). A greater proportion of patients treated with vortioxetine than placebo exhibited UPSA composite score response at each threshold analyzed and were classified as responders based on UPSA CFB of ≥7 (p = 0.006) or ≥9 (p = 0.016). No significant effects were observed for duloxetine versus placebo for any baseline levels of functional impairment or response thresholds. Path analysis demonstrated that 96.9% of the effects on functional capacity can be directly attributed to the treatment effect of vortioxetine and are not mediated by improvements in depressive symptoms as measured by MADRS.Conclusion: The effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity is robust across different level of functional impairment in patients with MDD. The effect on functional capacity was largely independent of the effect on depressive symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01564862: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01564862; European Clinical Trials Database [EudraCT] Number 2011-005298-22: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2011-005298-22/DE.

Perioperative Duloxetine for Pain Management After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of perioperative duloxetine on pain management in patients recovering from laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: Of 100 patients enrolled, 80 were randomized 1:1 to receive perioperative duloxetine (n = 40) or placebo (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions from November 2017 through March 2018 received 2 doses of 60 mg duloxetine or placebo 2 hours before and 24 hours after surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Quality of Recovery (QoR)-40 questionnaire was completed by participants after discharge. Study and control groups were compared in terms of questionnaire scores, opioid analgesic use, and hospital length of stay. The baseline characteristics of the groups were comparable; median total QoR-40 scores were 111 of 200 and 112 of 200 for duloxetine and the placebo group, respectively; the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .91). Although the physical independence subcomponent of the recovery questionnaire was improved in favor of duloxetine, none of the subcomponents reached statistical difference between groups. The groups did not differ in terms of postoperative narcotic analgesic use and hospital length of stay (p >.05). CONCLUSION: Perioperative duloxetine did not reduce pain, need for narcotic analgesia, or hospital length of stay following laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Sexually dimorphic therapeutic response in bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain reveals altered pain physiology in female rodents.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP) in both sexes compromises many current chemotherapeutics and lacks an FDA-approved therapy. We recently identified the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 1 (S1PR1) and A3 adenosine receptor subtype (A3AR) as novel targets for therapeutic intervention. Our work in male rodents using paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, and bortezomib showed robust inhibition of CINP with either S1PR1 antagonists or A3AR agonists. The S1PR1 functional antagonist FTY720 (Gilenya) is FDA-approved for treating multiple sclerosis, and selective A3AR agonists are in advanced clinical trials for cancer and inflammatory disorders, underscoring the need for their expedited trials in patients with CINP as chemotherapy adjuncts. Our findings reveal that S1PR1 antagonists and A3AR agonists mitigate paclitaxel and oxaliplatin CINP in female and male rodents, but failed to block or reverse bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain (BINP) in females. Although numerous mechanisms likely underlie these differences, we focused on receptor levels. We found that BINP in male rats, but not in female rats, was associated with increased expression of A3AR in the spinal cord dorsal horn, whereas S1PR1 levels were similar in both sexes. Thus, alternative mechanisms beyond receptor expression may account for sex differences in response to S1PR1 antagonists. Morphine and duloxetine, both clinical analgesics, reversed BINP in female mice, demonstrating that the lack of response is specific to S1PR1 and A3AR agents. Our findings suggest that A3AR- and S1PR1-based therapies are not viable approaches in preventing and treating BINP in females and should inform future clinical trials of these drugs as adjuncts to chemotherapy.

The Effect of Food on the Single-Dose Bioavailability and Tolerability of the Highest Marketed Strength of Duloxetine.

Duloxetine is a combined serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor indicated in adults for the treatment of major depressive disorder, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, and generalized anxiety disorder. The aim of these studies was to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and safety of duloxetine 60-mg gastroresistant hard capsules following single-dose administration. The data were obtained from 2 phase 1 bioequivalence studies, 1 in a fasting state and the other under fed conditions. Both studies have shown that, when administered as a single dose in the same prandial state, the test and reference duloxetine treatments were bioequivalent and exhibited similar safety profiles. The mean fed and fasting pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-related adverse events from the 2 studies were compared in order to assess the effect of food on the duloxetine bioavailability and respectively, tolerability. Administration of duloxetine in fed conditions increased peak plasma concentration by up to 30% and delayed mean time to peak concentration by an average of 1.15 hours while having an insignificant effect on extent of absorption (area under the plasma concentration-time curve in fed state within ±6% as compared with fasting conditions). Even though peak plasma levels were substantially higher in the fed state, there was no negative impact on the drug's safety profile. Actually, administration with food resulted in a lower average number of adverse events per single dose exposure. The negligible variation in overall systemic exposure suggests that efficacy remains unchanged irrespective of administration conditions; however, a better tolerability of the 60-mg dose is expected when the drug is taken with food.