Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) / Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV)

Antecedentes y objetivos No existen guías clínicas para el manejo del nevus displásico (ND). Determinaremos el porcentaje de dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) que ampliarían márgenes o tendrían actitud conservadora en un ND, y si los antecedentes personales (AP) y/o familiares (AF) de melanoma modificarían la actitud tomada frente a un paciente sin antecedentes de interés. Material y métodos Se difundió la encuesta a 738 dermatólogos y se recogieron datos de forma anónima del 15 de junio de 2022 al 31 de julio de 2022. Las variables de exposición fueron el grado de displasia (bajo/alto), los márgenes (afecto/libre) y los antecedentes de melanoma (sin antecedentes/AF/AP). Las variables dependientes (actitud) incluyeron observación/márgenes de 1-4mm /márgenes 5-10mm. Resultados Se recibieron 86 respuestas. Si el patólogo informase bordes afectos en un ND de bajo grado, el 60,5% ampliarían márgenes de 1 a 4mm, mientras que si los márgenes están libres el 97,7%, tendrían una actitud conservadora. Si el patólogo informara bordes afectos en un ND de alto grado, solo el 1,2% tendrían una actitud conservadora, porcentaje que se incrementa notablemente si los márgenes están libres (68,6%). El AF o el AP de melanoma no influirían en la actitud de la mayoría. Conclusiones El manejo del ND no es uniforme entre los dermatólogos de la sección centro de la AEDV, especialmente en el caso de ND de bajo grado con bordes afectos y ND de alto grado con bordes libres. El AF o el AP de melanoma no modifican en la mayor parte de los casos la actitud clínica (AU)

Background and objectives There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. Material and methods We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). Results We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists’ attitudes. Conclusions Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases (AU)

[Translated article] Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain Section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) / Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV)

Background and objectives There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. Material and methods We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). Results We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists’ attitudes. Conclusions Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos No existen guías clínicas para el manejo del nevus displásico (ND). Determinaremos el porcentaje de dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) que ampliarían márgenes o tendrían actitud conservadora en un ND, y si los antecedentes personales (AP) y/o familiares (AF) de melanoma modificarían la actitud tomada frente a un paciente sin antecedentes de interés. Material y métodos Se difundió la encuesta a 738 dermatólogos y se recogieron datos de forma anónima del 15 de junio de 2022 al 31 de julio de 2022. Las variables de exposición fueron el grado de displasia (bajo/alto), los márgenes (afecto/libre) y los antecedentes de melanoma (sin antecedentes/AF/AP). Las variables dependientes (actitud) incluyeron observación/márgenes de 1-4mm /márgenes 5-10mm. Resultados Se recibieron 86 respuestas. Si el patólogo informase bordes afectos en un ND de bajo grado, el 60,5% ampliarían márgenes de 1 a 4mm, mientras que si los márgenes están libres el 97,7%, tendrían una actitud conservadora. Si el patólogo informara bordes afectos en un ND de alto grado, solo el 1,2% tendrían una actitud conservadora, porcentaje que se incrementa notablemente si los márgenes están libres (68,6%). El AF o el AP de melanoma no influirían en la actitud de la mayoría. Conclusiones El manejo del ND no es uniforme entre los dermatólogos de la sección centro de la AEDV, especialmente en el caso de ND de bajo grado con bordes afectos y ND de alto grado con bordes libres. El AF o el AP de melanoma no modifican en la mayor parte de los casos la actitud clínica (AU)

Improvement of diagnostic confidence and management of equivocal skin lesions by integration of reflectance confocal microscopy in daily practice: Prospective study in 2 referral skin cancer centers.

BACKGROUND: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) allows accurate, noninvasive, in vivo diagnosis for skin cancer. However, its impact on physicians' diagnostic confidence and management is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the physicians' diagnostic confidence and management before and after RCM of equivocal skin lesions. METHODS: Prospective, 2-center, observational study. During clinical practice, 7 dermatologists recorded their diagnostic confidence level (measured in a scale from 0 to 10), diagnosis, and management before and after RCM of clinically/dermoscopically equivocal lesions that raised concern for skin cancer. We also evaluated the diagnostic accuracy before and after RCM. RESULTS: We included 272 consecutive lesions from 226 individuals (mean age, 53.5 years). Diagnostic confidence increased from 6.2 to 8.1 after RCM (P < .001) when RCM confirmed or changed the diagnosis. Lesion management changed in 33.5% cases after RCM (to observation in 51 cases and to biopsy/excision in 31 cases). After RCM, the number needed to excise was 1.2. Sensitivity for malignancy before and after RCM was 78.2% and 85.1%, respectively. Specificity before and after RCM was 78.8% and 80%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, real-life environment, and different levels of expertise among RCM users. CONCLUSION: Physicians' diagnostic confidence and accuracy increased after RCM when evaluating equivocal tumors, frequently resulting in management changes while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

Surgical re-excision vs. observation for histologically dysplastic naevi: a systematic review of associated clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The management of histologically dysplastic naevi (HDN) with re-excision vs. observation remains controversial because of lack of evidence about associated melanoma outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To assess published data on the development of biopsy-site primary cutaneous melanoma among biopsy-proven HDN managed with either re-excision or observation. METHODS: A systematic review of all published data: a total of 5293 records were screened, 18 articles were assessed in full text and 12 studies met inclusion criteria. No controlled trials were identified. RESULTS: Most studies (11 of 12, 92%) were retrospective chart reviews, and one was both a cross-sectional and cohort study. Many studies (nine of 12, 75%) had no head-to-head comparison groups and either only reported HDN that were re-excised or observed. A total of 2673 (1535 observed vs. 1138 re-excised) HDN of various grades were included. Follow-up varied between 2 weeks and 30 years. Nine studies reported that no melanomas developed. Eleven biopsy-site melanomas developed across three of the studies, six among observed lesions (0·39%) and five among re-excised lesions (0·44%). CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the available evidence the rates of biopsy-site primary melanoma were similarly low among observed lesions and re-excised lesions. This suggests that HDNs can be observed with minimal adverse melanoma-associated outcomes. However, all included articles were of low quality and further prospective trials could better guide clinical decision making.

Dysplastic vs. Common Naevus-associated vs. De novo Melanomas: An Observational Retrospective Study of 1,021 Patients.

The aim of this case-case study was to determine the differences between dysplastic and common naevus-associated melanomas (NAM) and de novo melanomas. A total of 1,021 prospectively collected patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma from an oncology referral centre were included in the study. Of these, 75.51% had de novo melanomas, 12.93% dysplastic NAM, and 11.56% common NAM. Dysplastic NAM, compared with de novo melanomas, were associated with intermittently photo-exposed sites, atypical melanocytic naevi, decreased tumour thickness, and presence of MC1R non-synonymous variants. Common NAM were more frequent on the trunk and of superficial spreading type. Comparison of dysplastic with common NAM showed significant difference only with regard to mitoses. Both subtypes of NAM shared less aggressive traits than de novo melanomas, albeit with no significant differences in survival after multivariate adjustment. In conclusion, NAM present with less aggressive traits, mostly due to a greater awareness among patients of changing moles than due to their intrinsic biological characteristics.

Dysplastic Nevus: Management by Canadian Dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: The management of dysplastic nevi is controversial. No studies have collected data regarding management of the lesion amongst Canadian dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of what the prevailing opinions are, regarding treatment and terminology of dysplastic nevi, amongst Canadian dermatologists. METHODS: An online survey of 25 questions was e-mailed to 613 members of the Canadian Dermatology Association, in French and English. RESULTS: A total of 179 responses were received. Varying numbers of participants completed each question. The majority of participants think that the term dysplastic nevus should not be abandoned, and they indicated that they never reexcise lesions with mild to moderate atypia even when the margins are positive. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Canadian dermatologists retain the use of the term dysplastic nevus and do not reexcise lesions with mild to moderate atypia even when the margins are positive.

C-kit expression of melanocytic neoplasm and association with clinicopathological parameters and anatomic locations in Chinese people.

Distinct genetic aberrations between melanomas in different anatomical locations have been confirmed in recent years. However, the associations between immunohistochemical expression, tumor sites, and clinical parameters are not clear. We examined the correlation of protein expression and gene mutation of c-kit with clinicopathological parameters and lesion locations in patients with malignant melanoma (MM). We collected 170 melanocytic lesions, including 106 cutaneous MM from acral melanoma (AM) and nonacral melanoma (NAM) sites, 24 dysplastic nevi, and 40 common melanocytic nevi. Tissue microarray was constructed, and immunohistochemical expression for c-kit was assessed with correlation with clinical parameters. Mutation in exons 11, 13, 17, and 18 of KIT gene in genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction sequencing was also analyzed. Immunostaining scores for c-kit were found to be statistically higher in Dysplastic Nevi than in common melanocytic nevi and MM. In addition, cytoplasmic c-kit staining was significantly correlated with poor survival in patients with AM but not in those with NAM. Twenty-nine cases of MM (including 9 NAM and 20 AM) are analyzed for mutation in exons 11, 13, 17, and 18 of KIT gene in genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction sequencing, and no genetic mutation is found. Our findings confirm that KIT mutations, in contrast to previous white cohorts, are not common in both AM and NAM of the Chinese and do not necessarily correlate with c-kit expression. The significantly different association between the expression of c-kit immunoreactivities and the mortality risks of melanomas on acral versus nonacral sites might change site-specific targeted therapeutic concepts in melanoma in the future.

The dysplastic nevus: from historical perspective to management in the modern era: part II. Molecular aspects and clinical management.

The dysplastic nevus is a discreet histologic entity that exhibits some clinical and histologic features overlapping with common nevi and melanoma. These overlapping features present a therapeutic challenge, and with a lack of accepted guidelines, the management of dysplastic nevi remains a controversial subject. Although some differences between dysplastic and common nevi can be detected at the molecular level, there are currently no established markers to predict biologic behavior. In part II of this continuing medical education article, we will review the molecular aspects of dysplastic nevi and their therapeutic implications. Our goal is to provide the clinician with an up-to-date understanding of this entity to facilitate clinical management of patients with nevi that have histologic dysplasia.

FISH as an effective diagnostic tool for the management of challenging melanocytic lesions.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of melanoma diagnosis continues to challenge the pathology community, even today with sophisticated histopathologic techniques. Melanocytic lesions exhibit significant morphological heterogeneity. While the majority of biopsies can be classified as benign (nevus) or malignant (melanoma) using well-established histopathologic criteria, there exists a cohort for which the prediction of clinical behaviour and invasive or metastatic potential is difficult if not impossible to ascertain on the basis of morphological features alone. Multiple studies have shown that there is significant disagreement between pathologists and even expert dermatopathologists in the diagnosis of this subgroup of difficult melanocytic lesions. METHODS: A four probe FISH assay was utilized to analyse a cohort of 500 samples including 157 nevus, 176 dysplastic nevus and 167 melanoma specimens. RESULTS: Review of the lesions determined the assay identified genetic abnormalities in a total of 83.8% of melanomas, and 1.9% of nevus without atypia, while genetic abnormalities were identified in 6.3%, 6.7%, and 10.3% of nevus identified with mild, moderate and severe atypia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, inheritable genetic damage/instability identified by FISH testing is a hallmark of a progressive malignant process, and a valuable diagnostic tool for the identification of high risk lesions.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in FAMMM syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations at the INK4a/p16 locus are implicated in several human cancer syndromes, including familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome, FAMMM-pancreatic cancer (FAMMM-PC) syndrome, and in familial head and neck cancer syndrome. METHODS: We present an individual with a family history of melanoma and pancreatic cancer who had multiple dysplastic nevi, squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue at age 22, multiple melanomas, a second squamous cell cancer of the tongue at age 40, and ultimately a pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: We demonstrate a germline mutation in INK4a and loss of heterozygosity at this locus in his HNSCC tissue. CONCLUSIONS: This report suggests that INK4a germline mutations associated with FAMMM/FAMMM-PC can also be associated with HNSCC. We conclude that HNSCC in young individuals should prompt clinicians to obtain a family history and consider that the patient may have a germline p16 defect that could predispose them to other cancers, including melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

Managing skin cancer--23 golden rules.

From their collective experience in Australia and the USA, dermasurgeons Anthony Dixon and Scott Hall have compiled a list of "golden rules" for general practitioners to help reduce errors and problems with skin cancer management. It is anticipated that these tips will provide a brief yet informative reference when faced with skin cancer management concerns in general practice.

[The dysplastic nevus. Separate entity, melanoma precursor or diagnostic dilemma?].

Today, 20 years after Clark and Elder postulated their tumor progression model of melanocytic lesions from common nevi to melanoma, there are still controversies surrounding this subject. Despite modem molecular biological developments, a consensus about the question, if the dysplastic nevus should be considered as a separate entity, melanoma precursor or just represent a diagnostic dilemma, still seems to be impossible. In addition, since the term melanocytic dysplasia is not precisely defined with regard to all diagnostic methods (clinical morphology, dermatoscopy, dermatopathology, molecular biology), there is considerable confusion. The question remains if a quite arbitrary classification of melanocytic lesions such as dysplastic nevus is useful at all. In daily practice, dermatologists should be aware of the fact that each suspicious melanocytic lesion could represent an early malignant neoplasia, regardless whether it is formally named dysplastic nevus or initial malignant melanoma. We conclude that solid dermatological experience plus novel tools of documentation represent the key factor to minimize patients' risk.