Efficacy, safety, and parental anxiety in a randomized trial of two dietary instruction methods for children with suspected hen's egg allergy.

BACKGROUND: Little has been reported on how to introduce hen's egg into the diet of children with suspected egg allergy. We compared the efficacy, safety, and parental anxiety of two different dietary instruction methods to introduce egg. METHODS: Eligible participants were children aged 1-4 years who were positive for egg white IgE, and ovomucoid IgE <3.5 kUA/L. Participants were either naïve in egg consumption or had a history of an immediate, but non-anaphylactic, allergic reaction to egg. After a negative result of baseline 2 g boiled egg white oral food challenge (OFC), participants were randomly assigned to the step-up OFC testing (SOFT) or home incrementing group. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who were able to ingest 20 g of boiled egg white 6 months after initiation. This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network clinical trial registry (UMIN000024192). RESULTS: Between September 2016 and August 2018, we randomly allocated 55 participants to the SOFT (n = 33 [60%]) and home incrementing (n = 22 [40%]) groups and analyzed 51 patients. Four patients were excluded because they were lost to follow-up. Thirty-one (96.9%) of 32 participants in the SOFT and 12 (63.2%) of 19 in the home incrementing group achieved the primary outcome (p = 0.003). No serious adverse reactions were observed in either group. Parental anxiety significantly improved during treatment in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The SOFT method was more effective than home incrementing as dietary instruction to introduce egg in children with suspected egg allergy.

Milk allergy most burdensome in multi-food allergic children.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is a substantial health burden, which disproportionately affects children. Among children with food allergy, as many as 70% have multiple food allergies. Whereas the overall burden of food allergy on quality of life has been described, little is known about the burden of individual allergens. We aimed to examine the perception of burden among families with multiple food-allergic children. METHODS: Parents of children with 1 + children with multiple food allergies including milk responded to online questions, including both open-ended and closed-ended questions on food allergy-related burdens of time, financial costs, social restrictions, and emotional demands. RESULTS: Overall, 64 children (69.8% boys) of whom (73.0%) most were aged 10 and younger were included. Most had been diagnosed with food allergy in infancy and by a (pediatric) allergist. Other common allergies included peanut (65.6%), tree nuts (57.8%), egg (76.6%), and sesame (31.3%). Quantitatively, milk allergy was reported as carrying the most burden, including most socially limiting (81.5%), requiring the most planning (75.9%), causing the most anxiety (68.5%), most challenging to find "safe" or allergy-friendly foods (72.2%), and costly (81.5%). Qualitatively, we identified five themes that captured burdens associated with costs, marketing of milk products to children, risk of cross-contamination, ubiquity of milk/dairy and public confusion with lactose intolerance, and an unwillingness of others to accommodate the allergy. CONCLUSION: Parents whose children have multiple food allergies, including milk, report milk as the allergy associated with the greatest time, financial, social, and emotional burdens.

Reintroduction failure is common among adolescents after double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges.

AIM: There has been a lack of research on adolescents who undergo double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. The aim of this study was to investigate food allergic adolescents' experiences and consequences of double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. METHODS: This qualitative, descriptive interview study included 17 adolescents aged 14-15 years with total elimination of cows' milk, hens' eggs or cod due to food allergies. The participants, who were initially identified from a large population-based cohort study, were interviewed 18 months after completing their challenges. RESULTS: The double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge proved to be a complex experience for the adolescents, involving fear of potential reactions and the hope that the food could be reintroduced. Experiences during the challenge were described in three themes: facing fears in a secure environment, being hesitant but curious about unknown tastes and waiting for unknown food reactions. Experiences after the challenge were described in two themes: gaining control and freedom and continuing old habits. A negative challenge was not consistently associated with the reintroduction of the challenged food. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of considering the adolescents' expectations and experiences of the challenge and the reintroduction process to ensure desirable changes in their dietary habits. Follow-ups should be performed regardless of the outcome of challenges.

Parental perceptions in egg allergy: does egg challenge make a difference?

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of an oral egg challenge in egg sensitized children on parental perceptions relating to their child's allergy. A questionnaire was completed by parents for 167 children attending a tertiary paediatric clinic with egg sensitization. The questionnaires included 10 questions concerning parental perceptions of their child's egg allergy. Parental perceptions of those children who had not had an egg challenge (n = 83) were compared with those whose children had a positive (n = 27) and those with a negative (n = 57) egg challenge. A significant difference (p = < or =0.02) was observed between challenge positive(CP) and challenge negative (CN) subjects in reported changes to lifestyle and the fact that more parents in the CN group expected little or no future inconvenience for the child. The responses of parents whose child had undergone an egg challenge differed significantly (p = < or =0.005) from those not challenged with a significant reduction in the following parameters; the effect on out-of-home care arrangements, the perception of being more severe as compared to other common childhood illnesses, whether they found egg allergy to be moderately or very stressful, whether their lifestyle was changed, the expectation of little or no future discomfort for the child and whether others treated the child differently. The performance of an egg challenge was associated with reduced adverse parental concerns. For 6/10 parameters, expectations concerning egg allergy in children who had been challenged were significantly better than those who had never been challenged irrespective of the challenge outcome. The greater certainty provided by the performance of a food challenge may be a positive outcome in both CP and CN children.

Restricted diets in children with reactions to milk and egg perceived by their parents.

The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which parents alter the diets of their children on the basis of perceived reactions. From a population-based sample of 2979 2-year old children with reactions to egg or milk perceived by their parents, one third had strict limitations on the intakes of these foods, representing 2.5% of the children in the cohort. In approximately 1 of 6 families the strict diets were initiated without consulting a doctor, and in a substantial proportion the restrictions were unwarranted. High maternal education level and irritability attributed to food were among the risk factors for unwarranted diets. On the other hand, many children, in whom an adverse reaction was verified, lacked appropriate diet restrictions. We conclude that the handling of adverse reactions to food frequently occurs outside the medical care system at the cost of correct diagnosis and appropriate diets.