Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(3): 262-269, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31309264

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Humeral epicondylitis is a common elbow disease. The prevalence is about 1.7%. One of the most effective treatment options is radiotherapy. Some authors mention that they apply a second or third course of radiation for recurrent pain or partial or no response to the initial course. As the results of a re-irradiation have not been systematically analyzed, the aim of this study was to document the results of repeated radiation treatment and to identify those patients who will benefit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was performed on patients from three German radiotherapy institutions and included 99 re-irradiated elbows. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy as well as for the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 51 years with 48.8% male and 51.2% female patients. Repeated radiation was indicated because the initial radiotherapy resulted in 39.7% of no response, in 41.0% of partial response and in 19.3% of recurrent pain. RESULTS: A significant response to re-irradiation was found. For the whole sample the median pain score was 6 before re-irradiation, 3 after 6 weeks, 2 after 12 months and 1 after 24 months. The percentage of patients being free of pain or with very little pain was 50.9% 24 months after re-irradiation. All subgroups, notably those with no response, partial response and recurrent pain had a significant reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation of humeral epicondylitis is an effective and safe treatment. All subgroups showed a good response to re-irradiation for at least 24 months.


Subject(s)
Elbow/radiation effects , Tennis Elbow/radiotherapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Humerus/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Re-Irradiation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 190(3): 293-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24424629

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of pain reduction by two dose fractionation schedules used for low-dose radiotherapy of painful elbow syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and February 2010, 199 evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective trial. All patients received low-dose orthovoltage radiotherapy. One course consisted of 6 fractions in 3 weeks. In the case of insufficient pain remission after 6 weeks, a second course was administered. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive single doses of either 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. Endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before radiotherapy, as well as immediately after (early response), 6 weeks after (delayed response) and approximately 3 years after (long-term response) completion of radiotherapy using a questionnaire-based visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35 months (range 9-57 months). The overall early, delayed and long-term response rates for all patients were 80, 90 and 94 %, respectively. The mean VAS scores before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response in the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy groups were 59.6 ± 20.2 and 55.7 ± 18.0 (p = 0.46); 32.1 ± 24.5 and 34.4 ± 22.5 (p = 0.26); 27.0 ± 27.7 and 23.5 ± 21.6 (p = 0.82) and 10.7 ± 15.0 and 21.5 ± 26.9 (p = 0.12), respectively. The mean CPS values before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response were 8.7 ± 2.9 and 8.1 ± 3.1 (p = 0.21); 4.5 ± 3.2 and 5.0 ± 3.4 (p = 0.51); 3.9 ± 3.6 and 2.8 ± 2.8 (p = 0.19) and 1.5 ± 2.3 and 2.4 ± 3.5 (p = 0.27), respectively. No significant differences in the quality of the long-term response were found between the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy arms (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Low-dose radiotherapy is an effective treatment for the management of benign painful elbow syndrome. For radiation protection reasons, the dose for a radiotherapy series should not exceed 3.0 Gy.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/radiotherapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Elbow/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management , Pain Measurement/radiation effects , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Radiation Protection , Radiotherapy Dosage , Recurrence , Retreatment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syndrome
3.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 22(11): 1580-8, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24138821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification is a pathological process characterized by abnormal formation of bone in nonskeletal tissue. Radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification of the elbow is questionable because of possible adverse effects. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, National Guideline Clearinghouse, System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to April 2012. All published articles assessing interventions including radiotherapy for prevention of heterotopic ossification in the elbow of adult patients were considered. Information was recorded by the first two authors, and disagreements in interpretation were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: In total, 27 studies using radiotherapy for elbow heterotopic ossification were identified (1 randomized clinical trial, 1 case-control study, and 25 case reports and case series) in the literature. Most of them used a single dose of 7.0 Gy. The randomized clinical trial was stopped early because of severe adverse effects (pseudarthrosis) caused by radiation. The case-control study showed that radiotherapy did not effectively prevent recurrence of heterotopic ossification. The case reports and case series mentioned only sparse adverse events. CONCLUSION: The use of radiation therapy for prevention of heterotopic ossification of the elbow is supported by weak evidence.


Subject(s)
Elbow/pathology , Elbow/radiation effects , Ossification, Heterotopic/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Ossification, Heterotopic/prevention & control , Pseudarthrosis/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Recurrence
4.
J Hand Surg Am ; 36(4): 628-31, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21414730

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study tests the conventional wisdom that using fluoroscopy under identical geometrical conditions results in less radiation when using the mini C-arm relative to the large C-arm. METHODS: We evaluated the radiation dose for both direct exposure and scatter 2.54 cm outside the intensifier. We used 3 mini and 3 large C-arms in a vertical orientation with the image intensifier below the specimen and the source above. We used 2 specimens: a cadaver hand/wrist and a cadaver elbow. Specimens were tested both directly on the intensifier and on a hand table placed on the intensifier. RESULTS: For the same setup, use of the mini C-arm resulted in direct patient radiation exposure greater than the exposure delivered by the large C-arm. Specifically, exposure using the mini C-arm was 53% to 70% greater than that using the large C-arm. In addition, use of the hand table resulted in exposure 80% to 94% greater compared with placing the specimen directly on the intensifier. In all cases, scatter at 2.54 cm from the intensifier resulted in an average exposure of 1.5% (SD, 0.24%) of the direct beam. Tube current, and therefore machine radiation output, was approximately 13 to 14 times greater for the large C-arm. CONCLUSIONS: Direct radiation exposure to the patient and scatter to the surgeon are minimized when the C-arm is positioned with the intensifier below and the extremity is placed directly on the intensifier. Under identical geometrical conditions with the intensifier below the specimen, the large C-arm with its greater source to image intensifier distance is associated with less radiation exposure than the mini C-arm.


Subject(s)
Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Elbow/radiation effects , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy/instrumentation , Hand/radiation effects , Humans , Models, Biological , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Wrist/radiation effects
5.
Exp Brain Res ; 176(3): 448-64, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16896977

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine motor output variability for different muscles in the same individuals. Ten young (21.7 +/- 3.4 years) and ten elderly (72.1 +/- 3.9 years) men underwent assessment of maximal isometric (MVC) and dynamic (1-RM) strength, and performed constant-force (2-50% MVC), constant-load (5-50% 1-RM load), and unloaded postural contractions as steadily as possible with the first dorsal interosseus (FDI), elbow flexors (EF), and knee extensors (KE). The coefficient of variation (CV) of force for isometric contractions and the standard deviation (SD) of acceleration for concentric, eccentric, and postural contractions were calculated. The 1-RM load, the CV of force for four of five isometric target forces, and the SD of acceleration during postural contractions were correlated between the EF and KE muscles. MVC force, 1-RM load, and SD of acceleration during postural contractions were not correlated between the FDI/EF or FDI/KE. The CV of force was correlated between the FDI/EF and FDI/KE for two of five isometric target forces. The SD of acceleration during concentric and eccentric contractions was not correlated between muscles. The normalized fluctuations during isometric contractions were greater for the FDI compared with the EF and KE. Elderly adults displayed greater fluctuations only for the FDI during low-force isometric and postural contractions. The dominant frequency of fluctuations was similar for the EF and KE muscles. The correlated fluctuations for the EF and KE muscles, within subjects, suggests that the two motor neuron pools transform the various neural inputs similarly.


Subject(s)
Elbow/innervation , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Knee/innervation , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Elbow/radiation effects , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electromyography/methods , Female , Fourier Analysis , Humans , Isometric Contraction/radiation effects , Knee/radiation effects , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/radiation effects , Nonlinear Dynamics , Posture
6.
Haemophilia ; 6(3): 162-9, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10792474

ABSTRACT

We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans taken prior to radiosynoviorthesis may be predictive of response to the procedure in persons with haemophilia. Specifically, response would be inversely related to the severity of synovial hyperplasia. Radiosynoviorthesis was administered to 21 joints with recurrent haemorrhage (target joints). A detailed self-report of haemorrhage history, joint evaluation with scoring according to the World Federation of Haemophilia orthopaedic joint and pain scales, plain radiographs, and MRI studies of the joints were performed pre- and post-radiosynoviorthesis. To augment comparison of the MRI findings to those assessed using the Arnold-Hilgartner and Pettersson scales, a provisional MRI scale for evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy was designed. We found the MRI findings prior to the procedure were not predictive of clinical response; independent of the severity of synovial hyperplasia, most joints bled less and showed improvement by the WFH orthopaedic score. There was generally no change in the severity of synovial hyperplasia after the procedure. We conclude that MRI evaluation is not routinely indicated prior to radiosynoviorthesis.


Subject(s)
Hemarthrosis/diagnosis , Hemarthrosis/radiotherapy , Hemophilia A/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Ankle/pathology , Ankle/radiation effects , Child , Elbow/pathology , Elbow/radiation effects , Follow-Up Studies , Hemarthrosis/etiology , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/pathology , Hemophilia A/radiotherapy , Hemophilia B/blood , Hemophilia B/complications , Hemophilia B/pathology , Humans , Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Hyperplasia/diagnostic imaging , Hyperplasia/radiotherapy , Knee/pathology , Knee/radiation effects , Phosphorus Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radiography , Severity of Illness Index , Synovial Membrane/pathology , Synovial Membrane/radiation effects
7.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 175(5): 208-12, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10356609

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this work was to estimate the error in dose calculations, to check the agreement between the measured and calculated doses and to analyse dose discrepancies in the group of patients undergoing total body irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A combination of lateral and anterior-posterior fields was used in 8 fractions and on 4 consecutive days. Doses were preliminarily calculated and then measured in vivo by thermoluminescent, semiconductor and ionization dosimeters attached to the body in 10 representative transverse cross-sections. Calculations and measurements were carried out for the beam at the body entry and exit. The error in dose calculations was estimated for each reference point. Dose deviations between calculations and measurements were analysed using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: The error in preliminary dose calculations ranged from 3% to 15% (Table 1). Standard deviations of the measurements and percent deviations from the calculations exceeded 10% only for the lung and neck exits (Table 3). Average thermoluminescent readings were 6% higher than the corresponding semiconductor readings. The measured doses fitted the calculated values within the limit of error, except for the lung, head and neck exits for the whole group, depending on the type of fields used (Table 4).


Subject(s)
Leukemia/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Whole-Body Irradiation , Abdomen/radiation effects , Child , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Elbow/radiation effects , Foot/radiation effects , Head/radiation effects , Humans , Knee/radiation effects , Lung/radiation effects , Neck/radiation effects , Radiometry/instrumentation , Semiconductors , Shoulder/radiation effects , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry , Wrist/radiation effects
8.
Acta Oncol ; 34(6): 721-6, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7576737

ABSTRACT

A cohort study with regard to the risk of haematological malignancies was performed on about 20,000 patients who in 1950-1964 received roentgen treatment for benign conditions in the locomotor system. In order to estimate the mean absorbed red bone marrow dose the treatments were classified as concerning 10 sites (cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, sacral region, shoulder, hip, elbow, wrist, knee and ankle). The four last-mentioned sites do not normally contain red bone marrow in adults and their contribution to the mean absorbed dose was regarded as zero. For the other 6 sites random samples consisting of 30 patients for each site were drawn from the cohort. By use of the treatment records and data from the literature on some physical parameters and red bone marrow distribution in normal adult persons, average conversion factors were calculated by which the subscribed surface dose could be converted into mean absorbed dose in red bone marrow. These conversion factors were then applied on the whole cohort and used for stratification of it according to different levels of exposure.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/radiation effects , Joint Diseases/radiotherapy , Leukemia, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Lymphoma/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Adult , Ankle/radiation effects , Bone and Bones/radiation effects , Cervical Vertebrae/radiation effects , Cohort Studies , Elbow/radiation effects , Hip Joint/radiation effects , Humans , Knee/radiation effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Muscular Diseases/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Risk Factors , Sacrum/radiation effects , Shoulder/radiation effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects , Wrist/radiation effects
9.
Biull Eksp Biol Med ; 116(10): 428-30, 1993 Oct.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8117976

ABSTRACT

An investigation of blood rheologic properties in 12 patients with acute pneumonia has been made by using low-energy He-Ne laser (LG-79-2) irradiation of vascular fascicle. 37 exposures have been performed, 40 min each. Immediate effects of He-Ne laser were studied comparing blood samples taken before and after the radiation. Results obtained have demonstrated transcutaneous blood irradiation causing prompt and pronounced effects on blood rheologic characteristics: reduced blood viscosity, improved both viscous-elastic properties and osmotic resistance of erythrocytes, activated platelet aggregation. These effects excluding the latter are rather positive for the human body. As for platelet aggregation, its activation following transcutaneous laser irradiation of blood might be expected to grow into a factor of risk provoking pathologic thrombogenesis in venous congestion, hypercoagulation and vascular wall injury.


Subject(s)
Blood Viscosity/radiation effects , Elbow/blood supply , Laser Therapy , Acute Disease , Elbow/radiation effects , Humans , Osmotic Fragility/radiation effects , Platelet Aggregation/radiation effects , Pneumonia/blood , Pneumonia/radiotherapy , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...