[To determine the value of iMAX, a new electrodiagnostic method, and its application in the evaluation of peripheral motor nerve excitability].

Objective: To test the new method of iMAX (the minimum stimulus current that elicits the maximum compound muscle action potential amplitude) electrodiagnosis, verify the feasibility of this method in evaluating the excitability of peripheral motor axons, and preliminarily explore the clinical application value. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study. A total of 50 healthy subjects were recruited from the outpatient department of Peking University Third Hospital from June 2022 to March 2023, including 25 males and 25 females, aged 25-68 (48±8) years. Eleven patients with Charcot-Marie-Pain-1A (CMT1A), 7 males and 4 females, aged 19-55 (41±13) years and 21 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), 10 males and 11 females, aged 28-79 (53±16) years were enrolled in this study. iMAX of bilateral median nerves, ulnar nerves and peroneal nerves were detected in all patients. Repeatable motor responses with minimum motor threshold and amplitude of at least 0.1 mV and the minimum stimulus current intensity, at which the maximum compound muscle action potential amplitude is elicited, were measured respectively [1 mA increment is called (iUP) and, 0.1 mA adjustment is called (iMAX)].Comparison of the parameters: the parameters of threshold, iUP and iMAX were compared among different age groups, genders and sides, body mass index(BMI) values and detection time , as well as between CMT1A patients, DPN patients and healthy subjects. Results: In healthy subjects, the threshold, iUP value and iMAX value were (1.8±0.7) mA, (4.4±1.2) mA, and (4.2±1.3) mA respectively; ulnar nerve (3.1±1.6) mA, (6.8±3.2) mA, (6.4±3.2) mA; peroneal nerve (3.7±2.0) mA, (7.8±2.8) mA, (7.4±2.9) mA. There were statistically significant differences in threshold, iUP value and iMAX value among different age groups (all P<0.001).With the increase of age, there was a trend of increasing threshold, iUP, and iMAX values in different nerves, and the differences are statistically significant (all P<0.001). There were no significant differences in gender, side and detection time threshold, iUP value and iMAX value (all P>0.05). The parameters of healthy subjects with high BMI value were higher than those of healthy subjects with low BMI value(all P<0.05). Compared with the healthy subjects, the parameters of 11 CMT1A patients were significantly increased (all P<0.05), and the parameters of 21 DPN patients were slightly increased (P<0.05). Conclusion: The new iMAX method reflects the excitability of motor axons and early axonal dysfunction, which is an important supplement to the traditional nerve conduction, and can be used to monitor motor axon excitability disorders.

"Mild", "Moderate", or "Severe" Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? Depends on Who You Ask: Analysis of Existing Classification Systems in 665 Hands.

OBJECTIVES: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy in the body and impacts approximately 5% of the U.S. population costing nearly $5 billion/year. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is considered the gold standard for CTS diagnosis. Classification systems exist that categorize CTS severity based on EDX findings. This investigation evaluated EDX findings across consecutive CTS severity categories within existing classification systems and consolidated classifications. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 665 hands from 468 patients undergoing EDX testing for suspected CTS. Complete classification systems and consolidated classifications were evaluated for discrimination capability across consecutive CTS severity categories based on EDX findings. Additional analysis evaluated the relationship of sex and age factors and CTS severity. RESULTS: Consolidated classifications demonstrated superior discrimination capability between consecutive CTS severity categories regardless of classification system used. Demographic factors significantly influenced EDX findings and categorization of CTS severity. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the value of consolidated classifications for enhancing discrimination between consecutive CTS severity categories based on EDX findings. Demographic factors should be considered when interpreting EDX findings for the purpose of categorizing CTS severity. Future research should refine existing classification systems and explore additional factors influencing CTS severity used to inform medical management.

Ulnar neuropathy.

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common compressive neuropathy. Less common, although similarly disabling, are ulnar neuropathies above the elbow, at the forearm, and the wrist, which can present with different combinations of intrinsic hand muscle weakness and sensory loss. Electrodiagnostic studies are moderately sensitive in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy, although their ability to localize the site of nerve injury is often limited. Nerve imaging with ultrasound can provide greater localization of ulnar injury and identification of specific anatomical pathology causing nerve entrapment. Specifically, imaging can now reliably distinguish ulnar nerve entrapment under the humero-ulnar arcade (cubital tunnel) from nerve injury at the retro-epicondylar groove. Both these pathologies have historically been diagnosed as either "ulnar neuropathy at the elbow," which is non-specific, or "cubital tunnel syndrome," which is often erroneous. Natural history studies are few and limited, although many cases of mild-moderate ulnar neuropathy at the elbow appear to remit spontaneously. Conservative management, perineural steroid injections, and surgical release have all been studied in treating ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Despite this, questions remain about the most appropriate management for many patients, which is reflected in the absence of management guidelines.

Sciatic and tibial neuropathies.

The sciatic nerve is the body's largest peripheral nerve. Along with their two terminal divisions (tibial and fibular), their anatomic location makes them particularly vulnerable to trauma and iatrogenic injuries. A thorough understanding of the functional anatomy is required to adequately localize lesions in this lengthy neural pathway. Proximal disorders of the nerve can be challenging to precisely localize among a range of possibilities including lumbosacral pathology, radiculopathy, or piriformis syndrome. A correct diagnosis is based upon a thorough history and physical examination, which will then appropriately direct adjunctive investigations such as imaging and electrodiagnostic testing. Disorders of the sciatic nerve and its terminal branches are disabling for patients, and expert assessment by rehabilitation professionals is important in limiting their impact. Applying techniques established in the upper extremity, surgical reconstruction of lower extremity nerve dysfunction is rapidly improving and evolving. These new techniques, such as nerve transfers, require electrodiagnostic assessment of both the injured nerve(s) as well as healthy, potential donor nerves as part of a complete neurophysiological examination.

The role of electrodiagnosis in focal neuropathies.

Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing plays an important role in confirming a mononeuropathy, localizing the site of nerve injury, defining the pathophysiology, and assessing the severity and prognosis. The combination of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography findings provides the necessary information to fully assess a nerve. The pattern of NCS abnormalities reflects the underlying pathophysiology, with focal slowing or conduction block in neuropraxic injuries and reduced amplitudes in axonotmetic injuries. Needle electromyography findings, including spontaneous activity and voluntary motor unit potential changes, complement the NCS findings and further characterize chronicity and degree of axon loss and reinnervation. EDX is used as an objective marker to follow the progression of a mononeuropathy over time.

The role of imaging in focal neuropathies.

Electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) has been the diagnostic tool of choice in peripheral nerve disease for many years, but in recent years, peripheral nerve imaging has been used ever more frequently in daily clinical practice. Nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance (MR) neurography are able to visualize nerve structures reliably. These techniques can aid in localizing nerve pathology and can reveal significant anatomical abnormalities underlying nerve pathology that may have been otherwise undetected by EDX. As such, nerve ultrasound and MR neurography can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and can have a significant effect on treatment strategy. In this chapter, the basic principles and recent developments of these techniques will be discussed, as well as their potential application in several types of peripheral nerve disease, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), radial neuropathy, brachial and lumbosacral plexopathy, neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), fibular, tibial, sciatic, femoral neuropathy, meralgia paresthetica, peripheral nerve trauma, tumors, and inflammatory neuropathies.

Axillary and musculocutaneous neuropathies.

This chapter covers axillary and musculocutaneous neuropathies, with a focus on clinically relevant anatomy, electrodiagnostic approaches, etiologic considerations, and management principles. Disorders of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, a derivative of the musculocutaneous nerve, are also reviewed. We emphasize the importance of objective findings, including the physical examination and electrodiagnostic evaluation in confirming the isolated involvement of each nerve which, along with the clinical history, informs etiologic considerations. Axillary and musculocutaneous neuropathies are both rare in isolation and most frequently occur in the setting of trauma. Less commonly encountered etiologies include external compression or entrapment, neoplastic involvement, or immune-mediated disorders including neuralgic amyotrophy, postsurgical inflammatory neuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, vasculitic neuropathy, and multifocal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Electrophysiological grading scale for polyneuropathy severity.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a simple electrophysiological scale for patients with distal symmetric axonal polyneuropathy, in order to promote standardized and informative electrodiagnostic reporting, and understand the complex relationship between electrophysiological and clinical polyneuropathy severity. METHODS: We included 76 patients with distal symmetric axonal polyneuropathy, from a cohort of 151 patients with polyneuropathy prospectively recruited from November 2016 to May 2017. Patients underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS), were evaluated by the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS), and additional tests. The number of abnormal NCS parameters was determined, within the range of 0-4, considering low amplitude or conduction velocity in the sural and peroneal nerve. RESULTS: Higher number of NCS abnormalities was associated with higher TCNS, indicating more severe polyneuropathy. Polyneuropathy severity per the TCNS was most frequently (63%-70%) mild in patients with a low (0-1) number of NCS abnormalities, and most frequently (57%-67%) severe in patients with a high number (3-4) of NCS abnormalities, while patients with an intermediate (2) number of NCS abnormalities showed mainly mild and moderate severity with equal distribution (40%). CONCLUSIONS: A simple NCS classification system can objectively grade polyneuropathy severity, although significant overlap exists especially at the intermediate range, underscoring the importance of clinical based scoring.

Volumetric assessment of ulnar nerves in cubital tunnel syndrome with 3D modeling of the MRI and its relationship with electrodiagnostic findings.

BACKGROUND: Thickened nerve cross-sectional areas (CSA) have been investigated in compressive neuropathy, but the longitudinal extent of nerve swelling has yet to be evaluated. We did a volumetric assessment of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) with three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modeling and investigated this relationship with clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters. METHODS: We compared 40 CuTS patient elbow MRIs to 46 patient elbow MRIs with lateral elbow epicondylitis as controls. The ulnar nerve was modeled with Mimics software and was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. The CSA and ulnar nerve volumes were recorded, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for diagnostic performance. We analyzed clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters to investigate their relationship with the 3D ulnar nerve parameters. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of CuTS, the area under the curve value was 0.915 for the largest CSA and 0.910 for the volume in the ROC curve. The optimal cut-off was 14.53 mm2 and 529 mm3 respectively. When electrodiagnostic parameters were investigated, the 3D ulnar nerve volume was significantly inversely associated with motor conduction velocity, although there was no association between the largest CSA and any of the electrodiagnostic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D ulnar nerve volume, which is an integration or multilevel measurement of CSAs, showed diagnostic usefulness similar to CSA, but it correlated better with conduction velocity, indicating demyelination or early-to-moderate nerve damage in CuTS.

Prognostic value of electroneurography using the midline method for predicting the development of synkinesis after peripheral facial palsy.

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic value of electroneurography (ENoG) for predicting the incidence of synkinesis is reportedly about 40 % using the formal standard method (ENoG-SM). However, the prognostic value of ENoG using the newly developed midline method (ENoG-MM) has not been determined. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the optimal prognostic value and advantages of ENoG-MM for predicting the incidence of synkinesis. METHODS: Participants were 573 patients treated for peripheral facial palsy including Bell's palsy or Ramsay Hunt syndrome. We investigated the clinical presence of any oral-ocular or ocular-oral synkinesis from the medical records. ENoG-MM and ENoG-SM were performed 10-14 days after symptom onset. In ENoG-MM, compound muscle action potentials were recorded by placing the anode on the mental protuberance and the cathode on the philtrum. In ENoG-SM, electrodes were placed on the nasolabial fold. Synkinesis was clinically assessed at the end of follow-up or at >1 year after onset. The sensitivity and specificity of ENoG values for predicting the incidence of synkinesis were compared between ENoG-MM and ENoG-SM at every 5 % around 40 % (range, 30-50 %). RESULTS: At every 5 % of ENoG values around 40 %, ENoG-MM provided higher sensitivity and lower specificity for predicting the incidence of synkinesis compared with ENoG-SM. In particular, when the cut-off value was set at 45 %, sensitivity was 100 % and 95.3 % with ENoG-MM and ENoG-SM, respectively. CONCLUSION: In peripheral facial palsy, ENoG-MM offered higher sensitivity than ENoG-SM for predicting synkinesis. ENoG-MM is useful for screening patients at risk of developing synkinesis. In clinical practice, an ENoG-MM cut-off value of 45 % must be the optimal prognostic value because of the 100 % sensitivity.

Electrodiagnostic studies and new diagnostic modalities for evaluation of peripheral nerve disorders.

Electrodiagnostic studies (EDx) are frequently performed in the diagnostic evaluation of peripheral nerve disorders. There is increasing interest in the use of newer, alternative diagnostic modalities, in particular imaging, either to complement or replace established EDx protocols. However, the evidence to support this approach has not been expansively reviewed. In this paper, diagnostic performance data from studies of EDx and other diagnostic modalities in common peripheral nerve disorders have been analyzed and described, with a focus on radiculopathy, plexopathy, compressive neuropathies, and the important neuropathy subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), vasculitic neuropathy and diabetic neuropathy. Overall EDx retains its place as a primary diagnostic modality in the evaluated peripheral nerve disorders. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound have developed important complementary diagnostic roles in compressive and traumatic neuropathies and atypical CIDP, but their value is more limited in other neuropathy subtypes. Identification of hourglass constriction in nerves of patients with neuralgic amyotrophy may have therapeutic implications. Investigation of radiculopathy is confounded by poor correlation between clinical features and imaging findings and the lack of a diagnostic gold standard. There is a need to enhance the literature on the utility of these newer diagnostic modalities.

Serial electrodiagnostic testing: Utility and indications in adult neurological disorders.

Although existing guidelines address electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing in identifying neuromuscular conditions, guidance regarding the uses and limitations of serial (or repeat) EDX testing is limited. By assessing neurophysiological change longitudinally across time, serial electrodiagnosis can clarify a diagnosis and potentially provide valuable prognostic information. This monograph presents four broad indications for serial electrodiagnosis in adult peripheral neurological disorders. First, where clinical change has raised suspicion for a new or ongoing lesion, EDX reassessment for spatial spread of abnormality, involvement of previously normal muscle or nerve, and/or evolving pathophysiology can clarify a diagnosis. Second, where diagnosis of a progressive neuromuscular condition is uncertain, electrophysiological data from a second time point can confirm or refute suspicion. Third, to establish prognosis after a static nerve injury, a repeat study can assess the presence and extent of reinnervation. Finally, faced with a limited initial study (as when complicated by patient or environmental factors), a repeat EDX study can supplement missing or limited data to provide needed clarity. Repeat EDX studies carry certain limitations, however, such as with prognostication in the setting of remote or chronic lesions, sensory predominant fascicular injury, or mild axonal injury. Nevertheless, serial electrodiagnosis remains a valuable and underused tool in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of neuromuscular conditions.

Electrodiagnostic methods to verify Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes in Istanbul: A prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic subtypes of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in Istanbul. METHODS: Patients with GBS were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2022 and two electrodiagnostic examinations were performed on each patient. The criteria of Ho et al., Hadden et al., Rajabally et al., and Uncini et al. were compared for the differentiation of demyelinating and axonal subtypes, and their relations with anti-ganglioside antibodies were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients were included, 69 before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (April 2019-February 2020) and 108 during the pandemic (March 2020-March 2022), without substantial changes in monthly frequencies. As compared with the criteria of Uncini et al., demyelinating GBS subtype diagnosis was more frequent according to the Ho et al. and Hadden et al. criteria (95/162, 58.6% vs. 110/174, 63.2% and 121/174, 69.5%, respectively), and less frequent according to Rajabally et al.'s criteria (76/174, 43.7%). Fourteen patients' diagnoses made using Rajabally et al.'s criteria were shifted to the other subtype with the second electrodiagnostic examination. Of the 106 analyzed patients, 22 had immunoglobulin G anti-ganglioside antibodies (14 with the axonal subtype). They had less frequent sensory symptoms (54.5% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.009), a more frequent history of previous gastroenteritis (54.5% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.007), and a more severe disease as compared with those without antibodies. INTERPRETATION: Serial electrodiagnostic examinations are more helpful for accurate subtype diagnosis of GBS because of the dynamic pathophysiology of the disease. We observed no significant increase in GBS frequency during the pandemic in this metropolis.

A review of electromyography techniques of the cervical paraspinal muscles.

Electrodiagnosis for cervical radiculopathy often involves exploration of the cervical paraspinal muscles. Accurate and reproducible results require a technique with specific anatomic localization, direction of insertion, extent of insertion, scoring system for insertion, and criteria for determining abnormality. We sought to understand if a published technique met these criteria. A Medline search found 39 articles with original research and 10 review articles involving the cervical paraspinals. A library search found 19 textbooks since 2000, but 9 were not available. Only two studies were specific to the question. Neither had reproducible techniques and they contradicted each other. Studies in which the paraspinals were used for comparison or inclusion did not provide any specific technique. The review articles and textbooks typically met none of our criteria and the few that discussed technique at all provided no reproducible methods. Despite 80 years of electrodiagnostic testing, there is no useful, reproducible technique for exploring the cervical paraspinal muscles. Yet such a paraspinal mapping technique has proven invaluable in the lumbar region. For cervical electromyography to be of value, the next step is to understand the anatomy and propose a reproducible technique. Subsequent research will determine whether the neck muscles are helpful in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. The absence of a valid reproducible cervical paraspinal technique impedes clinical and scientific understanding of cervical radiculopathy.

Training factors that influence electrodiagnostic medicine knowledge.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Self-assessment examinations (SAEs) help trainees assess their progress in education. SAEs also provide feedback to training programs as to how factors in training influence examination performance. This study's goal was to examine the relationship between the number of months of training in electrodiagnostic (EDx) medicine, the number of EDx studies during training, and scores on the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine SAE. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the 2023 AANEM-SAE results. In addition to the examination score, participants were asked approximately how many EDx studies they performed in training and how many months of training they had completed. Analysis included correlation of the examination scores with months of training as well as number of EDx studies. In addition, a multivariate linear regression model was developed. RESULTS: A total of 756 participants completed the proctored examination in May 2023. Examination score was moderately and positively correlated with the number of months of training (Pearson r = .5; p < .001) as well as the number of EDx studies during training (Pearson r = .55; p < .001). Scores steadily improved with additional months of training, but leveled off after 300-400 EDx studies. Regression analysis indicated that higher numbers of EDx studies were correlated with a higher examination score even after accounting for the number of months of study. DISCUSSION: We believe that a greater number of months of training is associated with better performance on the AANEM-SAE and that greatest improvement in examination performance occurs during the first 300-400 EDx studies.

An electrophysiological prognostic diagnosis for facial palsy.

Two electrophysiological tests for facial palsy-electroneurography (ENoG) and nerve excitability test (NET)-were reviewed. ENoG has advantages over NET in that it reflects the percentage of degenerated facial nerve fibers and can provide an accurate prognosis. However, as disadvantages, ENoG requires large, expensive equipment, and such supramaximal electrical stimulation can be quite painful for patients. NET is less painful due to weak stimulation with just enough current to meet the threshold, and the required equipment is compact and inexpensive to procure. However, it is impossible to calculate the percentage of degenerated nerve fibers, and NET is inferior to ENoG in terms of accurate prognostic prediction for facial palsy. The appropriate timing for both ENoG and NET is 7 to 10 days after the onset. While ENoG has proven more popular than NET because of its accuracy for prognostic prediction, we should not predict the prognosis of facial palsy based solely on the results of electrophyisiolgical examinations; a comprehensive evaluation including the facial muscle grading system is essential.

A Three months Electrodiagnostic Follow-Up of Patients Suspected of having Ulnar Nerve Involvement at Elbow Level with Normal Conventional Electrodiagnostic Study at First Evaluation.

Background: Compression of ulnar nerve at the elbow is the second most common peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremity. Objective: Due to the lack of the gold diagnostic standard for ulnar nerve involvement at elbow level (UNE) and the lack of sufficient study in this field, we decided to evaluate patients with symptoms of this disease who have normal conventional electrodiagnostic study (EDX) in first evaluation. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 18 persons were selected from patients who were referred to the clinic of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. If conventional EDX was normal, compound nerve action potential (CNAP) test (peak latency and amplitude) was carried out. Patients with normal conventional EDX but abnormal ulnar CNAP included to our study. After 3 months, if they had not been treated for ulnar neuropathy, they were reexamined by conventional EDX plus ulnar CNAP measurement. Results: In total, 18 patients (11 females, 7 males) aged 28-58 years old (mean = 40.11) were analyzed in this study. After 3 months, 14 patients (77.8%) demonstrated parameter changes consistent with UNE in conventional EDX. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, ulnar CNAP has diagnostic value in patients with symptoms of UNE who have normal routine EDX. Therefore, ulnar CNAP should be taken into account for early diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy when routine electrodiagnostic tests are normal.

The supraclavicular nerve.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe a new method for studying the supraclavicular nerve (SCN) conduction and to report four cases with SCN lesions. METHODS: The SCN was antidromically recorded with a pair of self-adhesive electrodes located in the middle of the clavicle. Stimulation (<5 mA) was delivered 7 cm proximally with a bar electrode. To facilitate recording, it was explained to the participant that they would feel a very faint electrical sensation locally and an electrical tingle upward (ear) or downward (shoulder/clavicle). Each participant was asked to say when the tingling moved downward. RESULTS: In normal subjects, median values were 16 µV (range: 9-33) for sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude; 1.2 ms (range: 1-1.5) for onset latency; and 1.25 (range: 1-1.7) for side-to-side amplitude ratio. In the four patients, the SCN SNAP was absent on the pathological side and normal on the healthy side. All four patients complained of unilateral neuropathic hypoesthesia on the anterior aspect of the neck, chest, and shoulder that occurred after radical neck surgery for thyroid or larynx cancer (x3) and first rib resection (x1). DISCUSSION: A comparison with previous reports shows that this simple method provides similar or highest SNAP amplitudes. SCN lesions are rare, and rarely referred for electrodiagnosis, and often overlooked. However, the SCN conduction study, which causes very slight inconvenience (low-intensity stimulation), allows a better understanding of the origin of the complaints and permits the patient to benefit of more suitable treatment.

Prognosis prediction changes based on the timing of electroneurography after facial paralysis.

BACKGROUND: The process of determining the prognosis and subsequent facial nerve decompression has become an important factor in determining the patient's quality of life. AIM: In this study, the prognosis of facial paralysis was verified in detail based on the timing of electroneurography (ENOG) and nerve conduction study (NCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ENOG and NCS of 368 facial palsy patients were analyzed. House-Brackmann (HB) scale after 6 months was used as an outcome. For the ENOG, nasalis muscle/levator labii superioris alaeque nasi (NL), and orbicularis oculi (OO) muscle were used and NCS performed using temporal, zygomatic, and buccal branches. RESULTS: ENOG at the OO performed 4-6 d after onset was ≤10% (p = .002, 10.0-fold) and showed unfavorable results (when the standard was ≥30%). In addition, the ENOG at the NL performed 13-15 d after onset was ≤10% (p = .001, 10.5-fold) and showed unfavorable results (when the standard was ≥30%). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that ENOG at the OO performed 4-6 d after onset and ENOG at the NL performed 13-15 d after onset had more prognostic value for the outcomes of acute peripheral facial palsy.

Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: Differences in methods and reference values.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). METHODS: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis. RESULTS: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. SIGNIFICANCE: Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.