Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 105(4): 643-647, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32585172

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine whether pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) accurately recognizes isolates belonging to clusters defined by techniques based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) using Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model. METHODS: We selected 65 isolates of ST395 P. aeruginosa isolated in seven European hospitals between 1998 and 2012. Isolates were typed by PFGE and sequenced by WGS. A core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) analysis based on 3831 genes was performed with a homemade pipeline. FINDINGS: PFGE identified eight pulsotypes and cgMLST differentiated nine clusters and nine singletons. Five cgMLST clusters and pulsotypes (31/65 isolates) coincided perfectly. Isolates without evident epidemiological links grouped by PFGE were separated by cgMLST (16/65 isolates) differentiating cities, suggesting that PFGE should be kept for the investigation of local outbreaks. Importantly, hypermutator isolates still shared the pulsotype with their parents (16/65 isolates), whereas they were not recognized by cgMLST. This shows that PFGE was less affected than WGS-based typing by the accelerated genetic drift that occurs in epidemic P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: although WGS-based typing has logically become the new reference standard, we show here that the PFGE can be used with confidence for the investigation of local outbreaks caused by P. aeruginosa.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing/standards , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Disease Outbreaks , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Europe/epidemiology , Genome, Bacterial , Humans , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Pseudomonas Infections/epidemiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/classification , Reproducibility of Results , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 56(9)2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29899005

ABSTRACT

Serratia marcescens is an environmental bacterium that is commonly associated with outbreaks in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Investigations of S. marcescens outbreaks require efficient recovery and typing of clinical and environmental isolates. In this study, we investigated how the use of next-generation sequencing applications, such as bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and bacterial community profiling, could improve S. marcescens outbreak investigations. Phylogenomic links and potential antibiotic resistance genes and plasmids in S. marcescens isolates were investigated using WGS, while bacterial communities and relative abundances of Serratia in environmental samples were assessed using sequencing of bacterial phylogenetic marker genes (16S rRNA and gyrB genes). Typing results obtained using WGS for the 10 S. marcescens isolates recovered during a NICU outbreak investigation were highly consistent with those obtained using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the current standard typing method for this bacterium. WGS also allowed the identification of genes associated with antibiotic resistance in all isolates, while no plasmids were detected. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA and gyrB genes both showed greater relative abundances of Serratia at environmental sampling sites that were in close contact with infected babies. Much lower relative abundances of Serratia were observed following disinfection of a room, indicating that the protocol used was efficient. Variations in the bacterial community composition and structure following room disinfection and among sampling sites were also identified through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Together, results from this study highlight the potential for next-generation sequencing tools to improve and to facilitate outbreak investigations.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Serratia Infections/epidemiology , Serratia Infections/microbiology , Serratia marcescens/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Female , Genetic Markers/genetics , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Quebec/epidemiology , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Serratia marcescens/classification , Serratia marcescens/genetics
3.
Euro Surveill ; 21(50)2016 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28006653

ABSTRACT

In 2012, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) initiated external quality assessment (EQA) schemes for molecular typing including the National Public Health Reference Laboratories in Europe. The overall aim for these EQA schemes was to enhance the European surveillance of food-borne pathogens by evaluating and improving the quality and comparability of molecular typing. The EQAs were organised by Statens Serum Institut (SSI) and included Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) and Listeria monocytogenes. Inter-laboratory comparable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) images were obtained from 10 of 17 of the participating laboratories for Listeria, 15 of 25 for Salmonella, but only nine of 20 for VTEC. Most problems were related to PFGE running conditions and/or incorrect use of image acquisition. Analysis of the gels was done in good accordance with the provided guidelines. Furthermore, we assessed the multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) scheme for S. Typhimurium. Of 15 laboratories, nine submitted correct results for all analysed strains, and four had difficulties with one strain only. In conclusion, both PFGE and MLVA are prone to variation in quality, and there is therefore a continuous need for standardisation and validation of laboratory performance for molecular typing methods of food-borne pathogens in the human public health sector.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Escherichia coli/genetics , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Laboratories , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Molecular Typing/standards , Salmonella enterica/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Epidemiologic Studies , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Europe , Humans , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/microbiology , Minisatellite Repeats , Molecular Typing/methods , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification
4.
J Fish Dis ; 38(1): 37-47, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25664362

ABSTRACT

Biochemical test, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence PCR (ERIC-PCR) were used to compare 42 strains of Lactococcus garvieae isolated from different regions of Turkey, Italy, France and Spain. Twenty biotypes of L. garvieae were formed based on 54 biochemical tests. ERIC-PCR of genomic DNA from different L. garvieae strains resulted in amplification of multiple fragments of DNA in sizes ranging between 200 and 5000 bp with various band intensities. After cutting DNA with ApaI restriction enzyme and running on the PFGE, 11­22 resolvable bands ranging from 2 to 194 kb were observed. Turkish isolates were grouped into two clusters, and only A58 (Italy) strain was connected with Turkish isolates. Similarities between Turkish, Spanish, Italian and French isolates were <50% except 216-6 Rize strain. In Turkey, first lactococcosis occurred in Mugla, and then, it has been spread all over the country. Based on ERIC-PCR, Spanish and Italian strains of L. garvieae were related to Mugla strains. Therefore, after comparing PFGE profiles, ERIC-PCR profiles and phenotypic characteristics of 42 strains of L. garvieae, there were no relationships found between these three typing methods. PFGE method was more discriminative than the other methods.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , DNA, Intergenic/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/veterinary , Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Lactococcus/genetics , Animals , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary
5.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 12(3): 244-52, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25658711

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen responsible for a severe disease known as listeriosis. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) coordinates a network of national public health laboratories (NPHLs) in charge of typing clinical strains. In food, it is the European Union Reference Laboratory for L. monocytogenes (EURL Lm), which manages a network of National Reference Laboratories (NRLs). A pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) standard operating procedure (EURL SOP) has been used routinely at the EURL Lm since 2007. The EURL Lm has recommended that NRLs use the EURL SOP, whereas the Statens Serum Institut (SSI), under contract for ECDC, requested that NPHLs use Halpins' SOP (HSOP) published in 2010 for the PulseNet USA network. An update of Halpins' SOP (uHSOP) was published in 2013. To facilitate the exchange of profiles among human and food European reference laboratories, it is crucial to ensure that the PFGE profiles obtained with these different SOPs are comparable. The aim here was to compare the EURL SOP with HSOP and uHSOP. The panel comprised 114 well-characterized SSI/EURL strains. All were characterized at the EURL using both the EURL SOP and uHSOP. Seventy of the 114 strains were also characterized at the SSI using HSOP. The EURL SOP and uHSOP produced indistinguishable combined (ApaI/AscI) profiles for the 114 strains tested. The EURL SOP and HSOP produced indistinguishable combined profiles for 69 of the 70 strains tested. One strain displayed for the AscI profile an additional low-intensity band at 184 kbp with HSOP. For this strain, SSI and EUR Lm had already observed the same profile from NPHLs and NRLs. However, this deviation is minor as it accounted for about 1% of all the 114 combined profiles. This study should facilitate the exchange of reproducible PFGE profiles among human and food reference laboratories.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/microbiology , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Europe , European Union , Food Microbiology , Humans , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Serotyping
6.
Can J Microbiol ; 60(6): 419-24, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24869470

ABSTRACT

Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A (B1A) strains are considered mainly nonpathogenic. However, some studies considered strains of this biotype to be the causal agents of infections in humans and animals. In South America, there are no studies that have compared clinical and nonclinical strains of B1A typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and none that have compared the capability of different enzymes on typing these strains. This study typed 51 Y. enterocolitica B1A strains isolated in Brazil and Chile by PFGE, testing the enzymes XbaI, NotI, and XhoI. The resulting dendrograms discriminated the strains in 47, 40, and 49 pulsotypes generated by the cleavage with the enzymes XbaI, NotI, and XhoI, respectively. The majority of the strains were grouped independently of their clinical or nonclinical origins. The high discriminatory power of PFGE confirmed the heterogeneity of B1A strains but could not divide the strains studied into clusters that differed in the frequency of some virulence genes as observed in studies using other methodologies.


Subject(s)
DNA Restriction Enzymes/classification , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Yersinia Infections/microbiology , Yersinia enterocolitica/classification , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Brazil , Chile , Cluster Analysis , DNA Restriction Enzymes/standards , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Genotype , Genotyping Techniques/instrumentation , Humans , Virulence/genetics , Yersinia enterocolitica/genetics , Yersinia enterocolitica/isolation & purification , Yersinia enterocolitica/pathogenicity
7.
Anal Chem ; 86(1): 729-36, 2014 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24274685

ABSTRACT

A high-resolution, rapid, and economical hydrodynamic chromatographic (HDC) method for large DNA separations in free solution was developed using narrow (5 µm diameter), bare open capillaries. Size-based separation was achieved in a chromatographic format with larger DNA molecules being eluting faster than smaller ones. Lambda DNA Mono Cut Mix was baseline-separated with the percentage resolutions generally less than 9.0% for all DNA fragments (1.5 to 48.5 kbp) tested in this work. High efficiencies were achieved for large DNA from this chromatographic technique, and the number of theoretical plates reached 3.6 × 10(5) plates for the longest (48.5 kbp) and 3.7 × 10(5) plates for the shortest (1.5 kbp) fragments. HDC parameters and performances were also discussed. The method was further applied for fractionating large DNA fragments from real-world samples (SacII digested Arabidopsis plant bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) DNA and PmeI digested Rice BAC DNA) to demonstrate its feasibility for BAC DNA finger printing. Rapid separation of PmeI digested Rice BAC DNA covering from 0.44 to 119.041 kbp was achieved in less than 26 min. All DNA fragments of these samples were baseline separated in narrow bare open capillaries, while the smallest fragment (0.44 kbp) was missing in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) separation mode. It is demonstrated that narrow bare open capillary chromatography can realize a rapid separation for a wide size range of DNA mixtures that contain both small and large DNA fragments in a single run.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/analysis , DNA, Plant/analysis , Electrophoresis, Capillary/economics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/economics , Hydrodynamics , Electrophoresis, Capillary/standards , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Time Factors
8.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 10(10): 873-81, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24066940

ABSTRACT

The European Union Reference Laboratory for Listeria monocytogenes (EURL for Lm) coordinates a European network of 35 National Reference Laboratories (NRLs), most of which perform food, environmental, and veterinary Lm strain surveillance in their respective countries. The EURL activities resulted in the recent creation of a database (EURL Lm DB). Typing and related epidemiological data submitted to the EURL Lm DB will be collected and shared by all the NRLs. For a given NRL, the only criterion required in order to submit pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles to the database was the successful participation with at least one EURL PFGE and PFGE profile interpretation Proficiency Testing (PT) trial. In this context, the EURL organized a PT trial in 2012 to evaluate the NRL's ability to perform PFGE and profile interpretation. A total of 18 NRLs took part in this study. Upon request from the Food- and Waterborne Diseases and Zoonoses Programme of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 10 National Public Health Reference Laboratories (NPHLs) also took part in this PT trial. Of the 28 participating laboratories, 16 obtained results classified as "good" or "satisfactory." These 16 laboratories included 10 NRLs (56%) and 6 NPHLs (60%). Of the 22 NRLs and NHPLs that participated in the part of the PT trial related to PFGE profile interpretation, 11 laboratories obtained good results. These 11 laboratories included eight NRLs, which therefore can now submit profiles to the EURL Lm DB. This PT trial provided a valuable opportunity to facilitate and to stimulate the sharing of reproducible PFGE profiles between human and food reference laboratories.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , Listeriosis/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , European Union , Humans , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/statistics & numerical data , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Public Health , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 89(2): 380-4, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23817329

ABSTRACT

Leptospirosis may be caused by > 250 Leptospira serovars. Serovar classification is a complex task that most laboratories cannot perform. We assessed the interlaboratory reproducibility of a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) identification technique developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Blinded exchange of 93 Leptospiraceae strains occurred between San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC) and the CDC. PFGE was performed and gel images were analyzed and compared with patterns present in each laboratory's database (CDC database: > 800 strain patterns; SAMMC database: > 300 strain patterns). Overall, 93.7% (74 of 79) of strains present in each receiving laboratory's database were correctly identified. Five isolates were misidentified, and two isolates did not match serovar PFGE patterns in the receiving laboratory's database. Patterns for these seven isolates were identical between laboratories; four serovars represented misidentified reference strains. The PFGE methodology studied showed excellent interlaboratory reproducibility, enabling standardization and data sharing between laboratories.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Laboratories , Leptospira/classification , Leptospira/genetics , Serotyping/standards , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Genetic Variation , Phylogeny , Reproducibility of Results
10.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 46(3): 195-201, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22819789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interlaboratory comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns is difficult. A key reference of standardized PFGE protocol for Acinetobacter baumannii may address this issue. This study aimed to determine restriction enzymes with rare cutting sites on A baumannii genomes and evaluate their cost-effectiveness, discriminatory power, and interlaboratory consistence of band assignments. METHODS: There were 42 A baumannii isolates collected, including nine from three hospital outbreaks and 33 sporadic isolates. The numbers of cutting sites for the restriction enzymes were explored using the "Restriction Digest and PFGE" program. The cost-effectiveness for PFGE analysis was evaluated for the tested restriction enzymes, while its discriminatory ability was expressed through a discriminatory index and 95% confidence interval. The interlaboratory consistence of band assignments was evaluated for the 42 A baumannii isolates. RESULTS: ApaI was the most cost-effective restriction enzyme for a PFGE protocol for A baumannii. Both AscI and AsiSI were reasonable in terms of costs. ApaI, AscI, and AsiSI exhibited similar discriminatory indices. ApaI generated more than 40 fragments that were close and not easy to resolve, resulting in less consistence of band assignments. AscI and AsiSI generated 10-20 fragments that were clearly resolved, resulting in higher consistence of band assignments. AscI exhibited a close discriminatory power to that of AsiSI and at half of the cost of AsiSI for PFGE analysis. CONCLUSION: We recommend AscI as the primary enzyme and AsiSI as the secondary enzyme for standardizing the PFGE protocol and interlaboratory comparisons of A baumannii.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/classification , DNA Restriction Enzymes , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Molecular Typing/methods , Molecular Typing/standards , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/economics , Humans , Molecular Typing/economics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 9(8): 719-26, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22870985

ABSTRACT

The European Union Reference Laboratory for Listeria monocytogenes (EURL for L. monocytogenes) coordinates a European network of 29 National Reference Laboratories (NRLs). Depending on a national decision, NRLs undertake food, environmental, and veterinary L. monocytogenes strain surveillance in their respective countries. In the framework of the PulseNet Europe network, two pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) subtyping proficiency testing (PT) trials were carried out in 2003 and 2006. The obtained data showed that PFGE profiles can be compared and exchanged between laboratories. However, no further PT trial had been performed since 2006. In this context, two PT trials were organized by the EURL to evaluate the ability of NRLs to perform conventional serotyping, molecular serotyping and PFGE subtyping. Eleven well-characterized isolates of L. monocytogenes were used: six and nine isolates were tested in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Three isolates were repeated between the two studies. In the 2010 panel, a strain was tested in duplicate, and two strains were related to the same epidemiological group. The strains were analyzed blind in different laboratories (17 in 2009 and 25 in 2010) using (1) their own in-house method for serotyping methods and (2) standardized protocols based on the PulseNet protocol for PFGE. For conventional serotyping, 86.0% in 2009 and 91.0% in 2010 of the serotypes obtained were in agreement with the EURL data. For molecular serotyping, 93.5% of the results in 2009 and 95.2% in 2010 matched the EURL data. For PFGE, 68.9% in 2009 and 81.7% of the combined AscI/ApaI profiles were indistinguishable from the EURL reference profiles. The variations observed could be attributed to slight standardization defaults or, in a few cases, to a failure in DNA extraction. These PT trials provided a valuable opportunity to improve the subtyping ability of NRLs and facilitate exchanges of subtyping data in the future.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Food Contamination , Food Microbiology/standards , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , European Union , Food Microbiology/methods , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Serotyping/standards
12.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 9(4): 325-30, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22443482

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A infection has caused public health problems in some countries in recent years. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used for the subtyping and epidemiological investigations of some serotypes of Salmonella, mainly in outbreaks caused by non-typhoidal Salmonella. In this study, different restriction endonucleases and electrophoresis parameters were compared for the PFGE subtyping by using Salmonella Paratyphi A strain panels. Two protocols for the enzymes SpeI and XbaI showed higher discriminatory power, which may facilitate epidemiological analysis for more accurate case definition, and clonality study of Salmonella Paratyphi A.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/classification , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Paratyphoid Fever/microbiology , Salmonella paratyphi A/classification , Bacterial Typing Techniques , China/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , DNA Restriction Enzymes , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Paratyphoid Fever/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Public Health , Salmonella paratyphi A/genetics , Time Factors
13.
Radiat Oncol ; 6: 6, 2011 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21235815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair can be tested by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in agarose-encapsulated cells. However, previous studies have reported that this assay is impaired by the spontaneous DNA breakage in this medium. We investigated the mechanisms of this fragmentation with the principal aim of eliminating it in order to improve the estimation of radiation-induced DNA repair. METHODS: Samples from cancer cell cultures or xenografted tumours were encapsulated in agarose plugs. The cell plugs were then irradiated, incubated to allow them to repair, and evaluated by PFGE, caspase-3, and histone H2AX activation (γH2AX). In addition, apoptosis inhibition was evaluated through chemical caspase inhibitors. RESULTS: We confirmed that spontaneous DNA fragmentation was associated with the process of encapsulation, regardless of whether cells were irradiated or not. This DNA fragmentation was also correlated to apoptosis activation in a fraction of the cells encapsulated in agarose, while non-apoptotic cell fraction could rejoin DNA fragments as was measured by γH2AX decrease and PFGE data. We were able to eliminate interference of apoptosis by applying specific caspase inhibitors, and improve the estimation of DNA repair, and apoptosis itself. CONCLUSIONS: The estimation of radiation-induced DNA repair by PFGE may be improved by the use of apoptosis inhibitors. The ability to simultaneously determine DNA repair and apoptosis, which are involved in cell fate, provides new insights for using the PFGE methodology as functional assay.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/radiation effects , Caspase Inhibitors , DNA Repair/radiation effects , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Animals , Apoptosis/physiology , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded/drug effects , DNA Fragmentation/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Statistics as Topic , Transplantation, Heterologous , Tumor Cells, Cultured
14.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 7(3): 293-8, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19911934

ABSTRACT

The PulseNet Methods Development and Validation Laboratory began a re-evaluation of the standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocols with the goal of optimizing their overall performance and robustness. Herein, we describe a stepwise evaluation of the PulseNet-standardized PFGE protocol for Listeria monocytogenes that led to the modification of several steps which significantly improved the overall appearance and reproducibility of the resulting PFGE data. These improvements included the following: (1) reducing the cell suspension concentration, (2) increasing lysozyme incubation temperature from 37 degrees C to 56 degrees C, and (3) decreasing the number of units of restriction enzymes AscI and ApaI. These changes were incorporated into a proposed protocol that was evaluated by 16 PulseNet participating laboratories, including 2 international participants. Results from the validation study indicated that the updated L. monocytogenes protocol is more robust than the original PulseNet-standardized protocol established in 1998 and this resulted in the official adoption of the new protocol into the PulseNet system in the spring of 2008. The modifications not only represent an improvement to the protocol but also describe procedural improvements that could be potentially applied to the PFGE analysis of other Gram-positive organisms.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , DNA Fingerprinting , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Laboratories , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Muramidase/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results
15.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 62(5): 372-7, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19762987

ABSTRACT

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is the most common genotyping method used for the typing of a number of bacterial species. Generally, investigators use their own custom-developed protocol, but a standardized PFGE protocol would allow the comparison of typing results between laboratories and the tracing of strains around the country. In the present study, we optimized a PFGE protocol for subtyping of Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., which are commonly isolated from nosocomial infections in many hospitals. Reproducibility of our PFGE procedure was studied three times at 2- to 3-week intervals. Epidemiological concordance of the optimized PFGE procedure was tested on seven isolates of A. baumannii from a previous outbreak and seven A. baumannii isolates randomly selected among the clinical isolates. The optimized PFGE procedure was evaluated on a total of 174 clinical isolates including 62 A. baumannii, 50 E. coli, and 62 Klebsiella spp. The inter-laboratory reproducibility of the optimized protocol was tested at four laboratories. The optimized procedure is completed in 28 h after culturing. It is likely to be cost-effective, due to the reduction in the time, reagent volume and enzyme concentration needed. The procedure showed high concordance with epidemiological data. There were no non-typeable isolates among the tested bacteria. It is reproducible and versatile. This protocol can be used to identify outbreaks and monitor the spreading rate of nosocomial infections caused by the tested bacterial isolates. Furthermore, due to its high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, the protocol has the potential to be useful for comparing PFGE fingerprinting profiles of the isolates from different settings.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/classification , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , DNA Fingerprinting/methods , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Escherichia coli/classification , Klebsiella/classification , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques/economics , Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , Cluster Analysis , DNA Fingerprinting/economics , DNA Fingerprinting/standards , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/economics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Escherichia coli/genetics , Genotype , Klebsiella/genetics , Molecular Epidemiology/economics , Molecular Epidemiology/methods , Molecular Epidemiology/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors
16.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(8): 2766-73, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18579720

ABSTRACT

The pandemic spread of Vibrio parahaemolyticus is an international public health issue. Because of the outbreak potential of the organism, it is critical to establish an internationally recognized molecular subtyping protocol for V. parahaemolyticus that is both rapid and robust as a means to monitor its further spread and to guide control measures in combination with epidemiologic data. Here we describe the results of a multicenter, multicountry validation of a new PulseNet International standardized V. parahaemolyticus pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocol. The results are from a composite analysis of 36 well-characterized V. parahaemolyticus isolates from six participating laboratories, and the isolates represent predominant serotypes and various genotypes isolated from different geographic regions and time periods. The discriminatory power is very high, as 34 out of 36 sporadic V. parahaemolyticus strains tested fell into 34 distinguishable PFGE groups when the data obtained with two restriction enzymes (SfiI and NotI) were combined. PFGE was further able to cluster members of known pandemic serogroups. The study also identified quality measures which may affect the performance of the protocol. Nonadherence to the recommended procedure may lead to high background in the PFGE gel patterns, partial digestion, and poor fragment resolution. When these quality measures were implemented, the PulseNet V. parahaemolyticus protocol was found to be both robust and reproducible among the collaborating laboratories.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Molecular Epidemiology/standards , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/classification , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/genetics , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Cluster Analysis , Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific/metabolism , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Epidemiology/methods
17.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 61(3): 251-5, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18343074

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the restriction enzymes with rare-cutting sites in the genome of Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis. The evaluation indicated that PFGE with both NotI and SfiI was discriminatory, but NotI was more cost-effective. Based on the results of this study, we suggest using NotI and SfiI as the 1st and the 2nd restriction enzyme for standardizing the PulseNet PFGE protocol for molecular subtyping and global surveillance of V. parahaemolyticus.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , DNA Restriction Enzymes , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/classification , DNA Restriction Enzymes/economics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/economics , Genotype , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/genetics
18.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 28(8): 772-5, 2007 Aug.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18080564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish a standardized operation procedure for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) on Leptospira interrogans as well as a figure digital database to develop the Chinese representative reference strains. METHODS: Under the characteristics of strains and referring to the other SOPs of PFGE on pathogens provided by CDC and PulseNet Asia Pacific, genomic chromosome DNA purification, restriction endonuclease digestion and the parameters for running PFGE were optimized. RESULTS: Not I digestion patterns of leptospiral genome for the Chinese representative strains were established and partial isolates of serogroup icterohaemorrhagiae from the leptospirosis surveillance in Sichuan and Anhui provinces were analyzed by PFGE. Results showed that each of all the 15 Chinese representative strains had a unique pattern. 91.67% (22/24) of the 24 isolates identified as serogroup icterohaemorrhagiae matched to the map of the reference strain 56601 (serogroup icterohaemorrhagiae serovar lai). CONCLUSION: The PFGE figures were clear with high resolution and the fragments were equally distributed by this standardized operating procedure so as to reveal the molecular-genetic characteristics of Leptospira interrogans. The patterns had high relativity with the serological identification and seemed to be very important for genetic analysis of strains in studying the outbreak of leptospirosis.


Subject(s)
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Leptospira interrogans/isolation & purification , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Databases, Factual , Genome, Bacterial , Leptospira interrogans/classification
19.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 4(3): 285-92, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17883312

ABSTRACT

PulseNet is a national molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance composed of public health and food regulatory agencies. Participants employ molecular subtyping of foodborne pathogens using a standardized method of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for conducting laboratory-based surveillance of foodborne pathogens. The PulseNet standardized PFGE protocols are developed through a comprehensive testing process. The reproducibility of the protocol undergoes an internal evaluation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and an external evaluation in multiple PulseNet laboratories. Here we describe the development and evaluation of a rapid PFGE protocol for subtyping Vibrio parahaemolyticus for use in PulseNet activities. The protocol was derived from the existing standardized PulseNet protocols for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Vibrio cholerae. An external evaluation of this protocol was undertaken in collaboration with three PulseNet USA participating public health laboratories. Comparative analysis of the PFGE fingerprints generated by each of these laboratories demonstrated that the protocol is both reliable and reproducible in the hands of multiple users.


Subject(s)
DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Laboratories/standards , Public Health , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/classification , Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , DNA Restriction Enzymes , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Food Microbiology , Humans , Phylogeny , Reproducibility of Results , Restriction Mapping , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serotyping , United States
20.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 57(Pt 1): 166-178, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17220461

ABSTRACT

Principles and guidelines are presented to ensure a solid scientific standard of papers dealing with the taxonomy of taxa of Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981. The classification of the Pasteurellaceae is in principle based on a polyphasic approach. DNA sequencing of certain genes is very important for defining the borders of a taxon. However, the characteristics that are common to all members of the taxon and which might be helpful for separating it from related taxa must also be identified. Descriptions have to be based on as many strains as possible (inclusion of at least five strains is highly desirable), representing different sources with respect to geography and ecology, to allow proper characterization both phenotypically and genotypically, to establish the extent of diversity of the cluster to be named. A genus must be monophyletic based on 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Only in very rare cases is it acceptable that monophyly can not be achieved by 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison. Recently, the monophyly of genera has been confirmed by sequence comparison of housekeeping genes. In principle, a new genus should be recognized by a distinct phenotype, and characters that separate the new genus from its neighbours should be given clearly. Due to the overall importance of accurate classification of species, at least two genotypic methods are needed to show coherence and for separation at the species level. The main criterion for the classification of a novel species is that it forms a monophyletic group based on 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. However, some groups might also include closely related species. In these cases, more sensitive tools for genetic recognition of species should be applied, such as DNA-DNA hybridizations. The comparison of housekeeping gene sequences has recently been used for genotypic definition of species. In order to separate species, phenotypic characters must also be identified to recognize them, and at least two phenotypic differences from existing species should be identified if possible. We recommend the use of the subspecies category only for subgroups associated with disease or similar biological characteristics. At the subspecies level, the genotypic groups must always be nested within the boundaries of an existing species. Phenotypic cohesion must be documented at the subspecies level and separation between subspecies and related species must be fully documented, as well as association with particular disease and host. An overview of methods previously used to characterize isolates of the Pasteurellaceae has been given. Genotypic and phenotypic methods are separated in relation to tests for investigating diversity and cohesion and to separate taxa at the level of genus as well as species and subspecies.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Bacterial Typing Techniques/standards , Pasteurellaceae/classification , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/standards , Genotype , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Pasteurellaceae/genetics , Pasteurellaceae/physiology , Phenotype , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique/standards , Reference Standards , Ribotyping/standards , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...