Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.652
Filter
1.
Med J Aust ; 215(3): 125-129, 2021 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34109641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the perspectives of doctors involved with voluntary assisted dying in Victoria regarding the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) and its operation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews with 32 doctors who had participated in the voluntary assisted dying system during its first year of operation (commenced 19 June 2019). Doctors were interviewed during April-July 2020. RESULTS: Three major themes related to problems during the first year of operation of the Act were identified: the statutory prohibition of health professionals initiating discussions with their patients about voluntary assisted dying; the Department of Health and Human Services guidance requirement that all doctor-patient, doctor-pharmacist, and pharmacist-patient interactions be face-to-face; and aspects of implementation, including problems with the voluntary assisted dying online portal, obtaining documentary evidence to establish eligibility, and inadequate resourcing of the Statewide Pharmacy Service. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors reported only limited concerns about the Victorian voluntary assisted dying legislation, but have had some problems with its operation, including implications for the accessibility of voluntary assisted dying to eligible patients. While legislative change may resolve some of these concerns, most can be ameliorated by improving the processes and systems.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Personnel/ethics , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Physicians/psychology , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Eligibility Determination/ethics , Female , Health Resources , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Pharmacists/ethics , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Victoria/epidemiology
2.
Health Serv Res ; 56(4): 643-654, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33565117

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental associations between the implementation of expanded Medicaid eligibility and prerelease Medicaid enrollment assistance on Medicaid enrollment for recently incarcerated adults. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data include person-level merged, longitudinal data from the Wisconsin Department of Corrections and the Wisconsin Medicaid program from 2013 to 2015. STUDY DESIGN: We use an interrupted time series design to estimate the association between each of two natural experiments and Medicaid enrollment for recently incarcerated adults. First, in April 2014 the Wisconsin Medicaid program expanded eligibility to include all adults with income at or below 100% of the federal poverty level. Second, in January 2015, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections implemented prerelease Medicaid enrollment assistance at all state correctional facilities. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We collected Medicaid enrollment, and state prison administrative and risk assessment data for all nonelderly adults incarcerated by the state who were released between January 2013 and December 2015. The full sample includes 24 235 individuals. Adults with a history of substance use comprise our secondary sample. This sample includes 12 877 individuals. The primary study outcome is Medicaid enrollment within the month of release. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Medicaid enrollment in the month of release from state prison grew from 8 percent of adults at baseline to 36 percent after the eligibility expansion (P-value < .01) and to 61 percent (P-value < .01) after the introduction of enrollment assistance. Results were similar for adults with a history of substance use. Black adults were 3.5 percentage points more likely to be enrolled in Medicaid in the month of release than White adults (P-value < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid eligibility and prerelease enrollment assistance are associated with increased Medicaid enrollment upon release from prison. States should consider these two policies as potential tools for improving access to timely health care as individuals transition from prison to community.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Poverty , United States , Wisconsin
4.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 45(6): 1059-1082, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32464663

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Twenty states are pursuing community engagement requirements ("work requirements") in Medicaid, though legal challenges are ongoing. While most nondisabled low-income individuals work, it is less clear how many engage in the required number of hours of qualifying community engagement activities and what heterogeneity may exist by race/ethnicity, age, and gender. The authors' objective was to estimate current levels of employment and other community engagement activities among potential Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS: The authors analyzed the US Census Bureau's national time-use survey data for the years 2015 through 2018. Their main sample consisted of nondisabled adults between 19 and 64 years with family incomes less than 138% of the federal poverty level (N = 2,551). FINDINGS: Nationally, low-income adults who might become subject to Medicaid work requirements already spent an average of 30 hours per week on community engagement activities. However, 22% of the low-income population-particularly women, older adults, and those with less education-would not currently satisfy a 20-hour-per-week requirement. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of potential Medicaid beneficiaries already meet community engagement requirements or are exempt, 22% would not currently satisfy a 20-hour-per-week requirement and therefore could be at risk for losing coverage.


Subject(s)
Community Participation/legislation & jurisprudence , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Employment/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/organization & administration , Adult , Caregivers , Community Participation/statistics & numerical data , Eligibility Determination/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poverty , United States , Volunteers
8.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 145(3): 637e-646e, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097335

ABSTRACT

Medicaid is a complex federally and state funded health insurance program in the United States that insures an estimated 76 million individuals, approximately 20 percent of the U.S. population. Many physicians may not receive formal training or education to help understand the complexities of Medicaid. Plastic surgeons, residents, and advanced practice practitioners benefit from a basic understanding of Medicaid, eligibility requirements, reimbursement methods, and upcoming healthcare trends. Medicaid is implemented by states with certain federal guidelines. Eligibility varies from state to state (in many states it's linked to the federal poverty level), and is based on financial and nonfinancial criteria. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 permitted states to increase the federal poverty level eligibility cutoff to expand coverage for low-income adults. The aim of this review is to provide a brief history of Medicaid, explain the basics of eligibility and changes invoked by the Affordable Care Act, and describe how federal insurance programs relate to plastic surgery, both at academic institutions and in community practice environments.


Subject(s)
Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Plastic Surgery Procedures/economics , Surgeons/economics , Eligibility Determination/economics , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Insurance Coverage/economics , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/history , Poverty/economics , Poverty/legislation & jurisprudence , Plastic Surgery Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 454-461.e1, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion increased Medicaid eligibility such that all adults with an income level up to 138% of the federal poverty threshold in 2014 qualified for Medicaid benefits. Prior studies have shown that the ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with increased access to care. The impact of the ACA Medicaid expansion on patients undergoing complex care for major vascular pathology has not been evaluated. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database was used to identify patients undergoing care for major vascular pathology in 6 states from 2010 to 2014. The analysis cohort included adult patients between the ages of 18 and 64 years who underwent a nonemergent surgical procedure for an abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic aortic aneurysm, carotid artery stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, or chronic kidney disease. Poisson regression was used to determine the incidence rate ratios (IRRs). RESULTS: There were a total of 83,960 patients in the study cohort. Compared with nonexpansion states, inpatient admissions for Medicaid patients with an abdominal or thoracic aneurysm and carotid stenosis diagnosis increased significantly (IRR, 1.20, 1.27, 1.06, respectively; P < 0.05) in states that expanded Medicaid. Vascular-related surgeries increased for carotid endarterectomy, lower extremity revascularization, lower extremity amputation, and arteriovenous fistula in expansion states (IRR, 1.24, 1.10, 1.11, 1.16, respectively; P < 0.05) compared with nonexpansion states. CONCLUSIONS: In states that expanded Medicaid coverage under the ACA, the rate of vascular-related surgeries and admissions for Medicaid patients increased. We conclude that expanding insurance coverage results in enhanced access to vascular surgery.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Vascular Diseases/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
J Leg Med ; 40(3-4): 391-419, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33797330

ABSTRACT

Georgia's Section 1115 waiver application, titled "Georgia Pathways to Coverage," seeks to simultaneously expand the state's Medicaid program and condition eligibility on work requirements. Though Section 1115 waivers have become a common vehicle for state Medicaid expansion, the imposition of work requirements is a novel departure. This article explores whether approval of Georgia Pathways to Coverage by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services can withstand judicial review. Recent precedent, beginning with the seminal Stewart v. Azar case, strongly suggests that a legal challenge would be successful on the merits. The features and justifications of Georgia Pathways to Coverage, examined in light of current data on work requirements in entitlement programs, make it likely that approval of the program would be found arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. However, unique aspects of Georgia Pathways to Coverage, as compared with similar state waivers, raise significant hurdles related to constitutional standing requirements and the appropriate judicial remedy.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , State Government , Georgia , United States , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services/legislation & jurisprudence
13.
J Occup Rehabil ; 30(1): 40-48, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31302817

ABSTRACT

Purpose Mental health concerns are common after a workplace injury, particularly amongst those making a compensation claim. Yet there is a lack of research exploring the effect of modifiable elements of the return-to-work process on mental health. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of perceived injustice in the interactions between claim agents and claimants on mental health symptoms in the 12-month following a musculoskeletal (MSK) workplace injury. Methods A cohort of 585 workers compensation claimants in Victoria, Australia were interviewed three times over a 12-month period following a workplace MSK injury. Perceptions of informational and interpersonal justice in claim agent interactions were measured at baseline, and the Kessler Psychological Distress (K6) scale was administered as a measure of mental health at all three timepoints. Path analyses were performed to examine the direct and indirect effects of perceived justice at baseline on concurrent and future mental health, after accounting for confounding variables. Results Each 1-unit increase in perceptions of informational and interpersonal justice, indicating poorer experiences, was associated with an absolute increase of 0.16 and 0.18 in respective K6 mental health score at baseline, indicating poorer mental health on a 5-point scale. In addition, perceived justice indirectly impacted mental health at 6-month and 12-month, through sustained negative impact from baseline as well as increased risk of disagreements between the claim agent and claimant. Conclusions This finding has highlighted the importance of perceived justice in claim agent interactions with claimants in relation to mental health following a work-related MSK injury.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination , Occupational Injuries/psychology , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Social Justice , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Compensation and Redress , Disability Evaluation , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Occupational Injuries/economics , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Victoria/epidemiology , Workplace
14.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 46(1): 1-3, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31800334

ABSTRACT

In 2018, the Trump Administration took the unprecedented step of allowing states to impose work requirements as a condition of Medicaid eligibility. States can apply for a demonstration waiver to require Medicaid beneficiaries aged 19-64 who do not meet exemption criteria (e.g., disability, caring for a sick relative) to participate in "community engagement" activities, which include employment, volunteering, and enrollment in a qualifying education or job training program. Debate thus far has focused primarily around the important issue of whether such requirements are legal. Less attention has focused on another serious concern - namely, that work requirements could exacerbate the nation's most urgent public health crisis: the opioid epidemic. Many enrollees with opioid use disorder who are unable to meet states' community engagement criteria will not qualify for an exemption from the work requirements, and risk being dropped from Medicaid enrollment. Refusing health insurance to individuals who are unable to meet work requirements could result in significant losses in coverage among a highly vulnerable population. Implementing new barriers to Medicaid coverage will hinder the effectiveness of massive state and federal investments in improving access to evidence-based addiction treatment.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Employment/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Opioid Epidemic/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , United States , Volunteers/legislation & jurisprudence , Work/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
Am J Public Health ; 109(10): 1446-1451, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31415201

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To assess the effects of work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).Methods. We used changes in waivers of work requirements to assess the impact of requiring work on the number of SNAP participants and benefit levels in 2410 US counties from 2013 to 2017 using 2-way fixed effects models.Results. Adoption of work requirements was followed by reductions of 3.0% in total SNAP participation, 4.5% in SNAP households, and 3.8% in SNAP benefit dollars, after controlling for the unemployment, poverty, and Medicaid expansions. Because able-bodied adults without dependents comprise 8% to 9% of all SNAP participants, our findings indicate that work requirements caused more than one third of able-bodied adults without dependents to lose benefits.Conclusions. Expansions of work requirements caused about 600 000 participants to lose SNAP benefits from 2013 to 2017 and caused a reduction of about $2.5 billion in federal SNAP benefits in 2017. The losses occurred rapidly, beginning a few months after work requirements were imposed.Public Health Implications. SNAP work requirements rapidly reduce caseloads and benefits, reducing food and health access. Effects on participation could be similar for work requirements in Medicaid or other programs.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Assistance/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
17.
J Med Ethics ; 45(8): 497-503, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331951

ABSTRACT

Following the recent condemnation of the National Health Service charging regulations by medical colleges and the UK Faculty of Public Health, we demonstrate that through enactment of this policy, the medical profession is betraying its core ethical principles. Through dissection of the policy using Beauchamp and Childress' framework, a disrespect for autonomy becomes evident in the operationalisation of the charging regulations, just as a disregard for confidentiality was apparent in the data sharing Memorandum of Understanding. Negative consequences of the regulations are documented to highlight their importance for clinical decision makers under the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. Exploration of the principle of justice illuminates the core differentiation between the border-bound duties of the State and borderless duties of the clinician, exposing a fundamental tension.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/ethics , Emigration and Immigration , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Social Justice/ethics , State Medicine , Beneficence , Case-Control Studies , Decision Making , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigration and Immigration/statistics & numerical data , Government Regulation , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , History, 20th Century , Humans , Moral Obligations , Personal Autonomy , Physician-Patient Relations , Social Welfare , State Medicine/ethics , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations/ethnology , West Indies/epidemiology
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(7): e197209, 2019 07 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314117

ABSTRACT

Importance: States are pursuing Section 1115 Medicaid demonstration waiver authority to apply community engagement (CE) requirements (eg, participation in work, volunteer activities, or training) to beneficiaries deemed able-bodied as a condition of coverage. Understanding the size and characteristics of the populations included in these requirements can help inform policy initiatives and anticipate effects. Objective: To estimate the number and characteristics of Kentucky Medicaid beneficiaries who would have to meet CE requirements. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study in which administrative records for the entire population of Medicaid beneficiaries in Kentucky as of February 2018 and original survey data, based on responses from 9396 Medicaid beneficiaries included in the waiver program, were analyzed. Exposures: Eligibility for Kentucky's Medicaid demonstration waiver as of the originally planned implementation date (July 2018). Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of beneficiaries included in CE requirements, including those already meeting vs not meeting hour quotas and those who may qualify for medical frailty exemptions. Results: Among the 9396 individuals included in the Section 1115 waiver program who participated in the survey, the mean weighted (SD) age was 36.1 (11.9) years; a weighted 47.2% of respondents were female, and most beneficiaries (weighted percentage, 78.2%) were non-Hispanic white participants. We estimated that 132 790 (95% CI, 129 132-136 449) beneficiaries would have been required to meet CE requirements in July 2018, amounting to 40.2% of Medicaid beneficiaries included in the demonstration waiver. Of this group, 25 422 (95% CI, 23 135-27 710) beneficiaries may have qualified for a medical frailty exemption either by self-attestation (after confirmation by their Medicaid insurer) or by being identified as eligible by physicians or their insurer. Another 58 943 (95% CI, 55 687-62 196) beneficiaries likely would have met CE hour requirements and been required to report compliance. Ultimately, 48 427 (95% CI, 45 281-51 574) individuals would have had to add new activities to meet CE requirements, amounting to 14.7% of those included in the demonstration waiver as a whole and 36.3% of those included in the CE component of the waiver. Beneficiaries in the potentially medically frail group reported worse socioeconomic status, poorer health outcomes, and higher rates of hospital admission and emergency department use than those meeting CE requirements. Similarly, the group currently not meeting and not exempt from CE hour requirements reported worse socioeconomic status than those meeting the CE requirements, although magnitudes of the differences were smaller. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings suggest that most beneficiaries who would be included in CE programs either already meet activity requirements, which they will be required to proactively report, or may qualify for a medical frailty exemption. Consequently, the outcomes of CE programs will depend on states' processes for addressing health-related, socioeconomic, and administrative barriers to participating in and reporting CE activities and identifying medical frailty.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/methods , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Kentucky , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
20.
Am J Hypertens ; 32(10): 1030-1038, 2019 09 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31232456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is highly prevalent among the low-income population in the United States. This study assessed the association between Medicaid coverage and health care service use and costs among hypertensive adults following the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), by income status level. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 2,866 nonpregnant hypertensive individuals aged 18-64 years with income up to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) were selected from the 2014 and 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Regression analyses were performed to examine the association of Medicaid coverage with outpatient (outpatient visits and prescription medication fills), emergency, and acute health care service use and costs among those potentially eligible for Medicaid by income status-the very low-income (FPL ≤ 100%) and the moderately low-income (100% > FPL ≤ 138%). RESULTS: Among the study population, 70.1% were very low-income and 29.9% were moderately low-income. Full-year Medicaid coverage was higher among the very low-income group (41.0%) compared with those moderately low-income (29.1%). For both income groups, having full-year Medicaid coverage was associated with increased health care service use and higher overall annual medical costs ($13,085 compared with $7,582 without Medicaid); costs were highest among moderately low-income patients ($17,639). CONCLUSION: Low-income individuals with hypertension, who were potentially newly eligible for Medicaid under the ACA may benefit from expanded Medicaid coverage by improving their access to outpatient services that can support chronic disease management. However, to realize decreases in medical expenditures, efforts to decrease their use of emergency and acute care services are likely needed.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Costs , Eligibility Determination/economics , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/economics , Income , Insurance Coverage/economics , Medicare/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Middle Aged , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...