ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pregnancies with donated embryos are at a higher risk of complications than the pregnancies from autologous frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). DESIGN: Anonymous, multicenter, comparative, observational, retrospective, matched-cohort study. SETTING: Six French assisted reproductive technique centers from 2003 to 2018. PATIENT(S): Seventy-three singleton pregnancies with donated embryos (exposed) and 136 singleton pregnancies after autologous FET (nonexposed) were matched at 7-8 weeks of gestation (pregnancy date, parity, and women's age) (2:1 ratio, respectively). In accordance with French practices, all women were <44 years old and donated embryos were discarded frozen embryos from other couples. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percentages of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) with donated embryos versus autologous FET. RESULT(S): Groups were comparable (mean age: 34.5 years) and HDPs (24.6% vs. 11.9%) were significantly more frequent among the donated-embryo pregnancies, mostly in its severe forms (17.5% vs. 4.6%). In contrast, their respective isolated hypertension frequencies were comparable (7.0% vs. 7.3%). Multivariate analysis retained increased severe HDP risk with donated embryos (odds ratio 2.08 [95% confidence interval: 1.08-4.02]). No significant effect of endometrial preparation was observed. C-sections were more frequent for donated-embryo pregnancies (47.3% vs. 29.2%). Newborns from embryo donation or autologous FET were comparable for prematurity, birth weight and length, Apgar score, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, neonatal malformations, and sex ratio. CONCLUSION(S): Even for young women, the risk of severe HDP was 4 times higher for donated-embryo pregnancies than for autologous-FET pregnancies. The HDP risk must be acknowledged to inform donated-embryo recipients and provide careful pregnancy monitoring.
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/etiology , Cohort Studies , Embryo Disposition/adverse effects , Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Cryopreservation/methodsABSTRACT
This document provides the latest recommendations for the evaluation of potential sperm, oocyte, and embryo donors as well as their recipients, incorporating recent information about optimal screening and testing for sexually transmitted infections, genetic diseases, and psychological assessments. This revised document incorporates recent information from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Food and Drug Administration, and American Association of Tissue Banks, which all programs offering gamete and embryo donation services must be thoroughly familiar with, and replaces the document titled "Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion," last published in 2013.
Subject(s)
Donor Selection/standards , Embryo Disposition/standards , Oocyte Donation/standards , Reproductive Medicine/standards , Semen , Tissue Donors/psychology , Consensus , Counseling/standards , Embryo Disposition/adverse effects , Female , Genetic Testing/standards , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Oocyte Donation/adverse effects , Preconception Care/standards , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: What are the attitudes towards different aspects of embryo donation among Swedish infertile couples who have surplus cryopreserved embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER: Nearly three-quarters of infertile couples with surplus embryos were in favour of embryo donation. A majority of respondents were also in favour of embryos being donated for research. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Currently, embryo donation to other infertile couples is prohibited by law in Sweden. Encouraging results have been published from countries allowing embryo donation, although it is a complex procedure associated with many emotional, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study included 471 infertile couples (942 patients) treated during the period March 2006 to March 2009. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples who had been treated at a Swedish university-based hospital and private IVF clinic and who had cryopreserved embryos were sent questionnaires with questions regarding socio-demographic data and their attitudes towards embryo donation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The response rate to the questionnaire was 58%. Of the respondents, 76% supported the donation of surplus embryos to other infertile couples, but there were divided opinions regarding the disclosure of the genetic parents' identities. Close to 60% of the participants indicated that donations of embryos should be allowed for research and about 45% of the participants approved donations of embryos to single women. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The relatively low response rate and the hypothetical nature of the questions may limit the validity of the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results from the study indicate that cryopreserved embryos may be available for donation to other infertile couples, particularly where restrictions can be set on recipient characteristics.
