Introducing the model of repeated exposure of skin to antiseptics: Randomised pilot trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intensified hand hygiene measures were recommended for preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. However, these measures can lead to skin damage and the development of hand eczema, particularly among health professionals. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the effects of repeated antiseptic use on healthy skin under controlled conditions and to assess the emollient use. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (nine females, age = 22.3 ± 2.8 years (mean ± SD), Fitzpatrick phototypes II and III) with no skin diseases were recruited. Antiseptic was applied daily for 3 weeks on the volar sides of forearms. Emollient cream was also applied daily. Skin assessments were performed using non-invasive methods (transepidermal water loss-TEWL, skin hydration, erythema and melanin content). RESULTS: Prolonged antiseptic use increased TEWL, decreased hydration and elevated erythema and melanin levels. Emollient cream significantly reduced TEWL and improved hydration on antiseptic-treated sites, and also enhanced hydration on intact skin. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of antiseptics can have adverse effects on the skin, including barrier disruption and inflammation. Emollient showed promise in improving skin hydration and reducing the damage caused by antiseptics. Further research with a larger sample is needed to confirm these findings and assess emollient efficacy during frequent antiseptic use.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Twice-Daily Topical Clascoterone Cream 1% in Patients Greater Than or Equal to 12 Years of Age With Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Clascoterone cream 1% is approved for the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged ≥ 12 years based on results from two 12-week Phase 3 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe acne. Safety and efficacy of clascoterone in patients aged ≥ 12 years from an open-label, long-term extension study are presented.  Methods: Enrolled patients applied clascoterone cream 1% twice daily to the entire face and, if desired by the patient and/or investigator, truncal acne, for up to 9 months. Patients achieving Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) could stop treatment and resume if/when acne worsened. Safety was assessed from treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and local skin reactions (LSRs [telangiectasia, skin atrophy, striae rubrae, erythema, edema, scaling/dryness, stinging/burning, and pruritus]) in all treated patients. Efficacy was assessed from IGA at each visit among those completing the study per-protocol (PP); face and trunk were evaluated individually.  Results: Of 600 patients aged ≥ 12 years (original randomization: 311 clascoterone, 289 vehicle), 343 completed the extension study (177 clascoterone, 166 vehicle). There were 187 TEAEs in 108/598 clascoterone-treated patients (18.1%), including 56/311 (18.0%) and 52/287 (18.1%) patients originally randomized to clascoterone and vehicle, respectively; the most common LSRs (previous clascoterone/vehicle) were erythema (face, 8.0%/7.7%) and scaling/dryness (face, 10.0%/7.3%). The percentage of PP patients with facial and truncal IGA 0/1 increased to 48.9% (156/319) and 52.4% (65/124), respectively, at study end. CONCLUSIONS: Clascoterone cream 1% maintained a favorable safety and efficacy profile for up to 12 months in patients aged ≥ 12 years. Eichenfield LF, Hebert AA, Stein Gold L, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of twice-daily topical clascoterone cream 1% in patients ≥ 12 years of age with acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):810-816. doi:10.36849/JDD.7592.

Efficacy and safety of microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide and microencapsulated tretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris: Results from two phase 3 double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: Benzoyl peroxide and tretinoin are commonly prescribed acne treatments. Historically, they have been difficult to combine in a single formulation due to chemical instability, and both medications are potentially irritating. Microencapsulation helps overcome these challenges. OBJECTIVE: Examine efficacy, safety, and tolerability of encapsulated BPO/encapsulated tretinoin (E-BPO/T) cream, 3%/0.1%. METHODS: Subjects ≥9 years old with moderate to severe acne were enrolled in 2 multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel trials and randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of once-daily E-BPO/T (n = 571) or vehicle cream (n = 287). RESULTS: E-BPO/T was significantly superior to vehicle in both studies, with more subjects achieving IGA success with E-BPO/T (38.5%/25.4%) versus vehicle (11.5%/14.7%; P < .001/P = .017). The change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count for E-BPO/T was -21.6 versus -14.8 for vehicle (P < .001) in study 1 and -16.2 versus -14.1 (P = .018) in study 2. The changes from baseline in noninflammatory lesions for E-BPO/T were -29.7 versus -19.8 for vehicle (P < .001) and -24.2 and -17.4 (P < .001) in studies 1 and 2, respectively. E-BPO/T was well tolerated in both studies. LIMITATIONS: Long-term data are not available. CONCLUSION: E-BPO/T provided statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in IGA and inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts and was well tolerated in subjects with moderate to severe acne.

Effects of Early Emollient Use in Children at High Risk of Atopic Dermatitis: A German Pilot Study.

Several small studies have indicated that daily emollient use from birth might delay, suppress or prevent atopic dermatitis (AD). Two larger trials did not confirm this; however, a recent smaller study indicated a protective effect if daily emollient use is used in the first 2 months of life. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of emollient use on development of AD. The current study randomly assigned 50 newborns who were at high risk of developing AD (1:1) to receive general infant skin-care advice (control group), or skin-care advice plus emollient with advice to apply emollient at least once daily until 1 year of age (intervention group). Repeated skin examinations, skin physiology measurements and skin microbiome profiling were performed. Of the children in the intervention and control groups, 28% and 24%, respectively, developed AD (adjusted Relative Risk (RR) 1.19, p = 0.65, adjusted risk difference 0.05). Skin pH decreased and transepidermal water loss and stratum corneum hydration increased over time in both groups with no significant differences. In the intervention group skin microbiome alpha diversity increased earlier, and the abundance of Streptococcus and Staphylococcus species were significantly reduced at month 1. Daily early emollient use in children with high risk of AD was safe, but it did not significantly reduce the risk of developing AD or impact skin physiology development.

How and what adverse events are reported and captured in randomized control trials of emollients in the treatment of eczema?

BACKGROUND: Emollients are universally recommended for atopic dermatitis/eczema ('eczema'), to improve the skin barrier and reduce symptoms. However, our knowledge of the frequency and nature of adverse effects associated with their use is limited. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine how well adverse events are reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of emollients for eczema. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched from inception (1946) to May 2022. Inclusion criteria were RCTs of moisturizers or emollients used as a leave-on treatment (as the intervention or control) in adults or children with eczema. Exclusion criteria were non-RCTs; patients with other diagnoses included; use of emollient as bath additives, soap substitutes or as preventative; and not published in English. References of eligible papers were reviewed for any additional, relevant research. Data were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet and analysed descriptively. An assessment of study quality was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for RCTs. RESULTS: From 369 potential papers, 35 papers (reporting on 34 studies) were included. Most research was conducted in research centres or hospitals (unclear in 34%). In total, 89% reported collecting data on adverse events related to emollient treatment use but the methods used were poorly reported (40% unclear). Four papers used patient questionnaires/diaries. However, it was unclear how and what was collected as only two studies showed the questionnaires used. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of adverse events related to emollient use in trials of patients with eczema is poor and inconsistent. Agreement should be reached on how and what adverse events should be collected, to standardize reporting across studies.

Evaluation of a novel skin care product for the management of chemotherapy-related dermatologic toxicities: A quasi-experimental study.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the efficacy of a novel skincare product for the management of chemotherapy-related dermatological toxicities. METHODS: A monocentric, prospective, interventional, open-label, pretest-posttest, single-group study with cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 100) was set up. All enrolled patients applied the emollient daily to their face and body for three weeks. The severity of the skin reactions was evaluated by a researcher using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 at baseline and end of the trial. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the frequency and severity of skin symptoms (Numerical rating scale, NRS), quality of life (QoL; Skindex-16 and Dermatology Life Quality Index), Patient Benefit Index (PBI), and treatment satisfaction. PROs were collected at baseline, weekly, and at the end of the trial. RESULTS: According to the CTCAE and NRS, the novel emollient significantly improved the severity and frequency of xerosis and pruritus (Ps ≤ .001). A significant reduction in the NRS score for frequency of erythema was measured (p < .001). The frequency and severity of burning and pain did not change. Regarding the patients' QoL, no beneficial effect of the skin care product was measurable. 44% of the patients experienced at least one patient-relevant treatment benefit. 87% of the patients were satisfied with the emollient and would recommend it. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the novel emollient significantly reduced chemotherapy-induced skin toxicity, more specifically xerosis and pruritus without hampering patient's QoL. Future research is needed to make definite conclusions using a study design including a control group and a long-term follow-up.

A randomized, observer-blind, vehicle-control, multi-center clinical investigation for assessing the efficacy and tolerability of a 1% ectoine and hyaluronic acid 0.1%-containing medical device in pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Ectoine is a widespread osmolyte enabling halophilic bacteria to withstand high osmotic stress that has many potential applications ranging from cosmetics to its use as a therapeutic agent. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ectoine 1% and hyaluronic acid 0.1% containing (EHA) cream with a vehicle cream in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, observer-blind, multicenter clinical trial was conducted in children aged 2-18 years, diagnosed with mild-to-moderate AD (SCORAD ≤20). Patients were randomized to either receiving EHA cream or vehicle cream twice daily for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in objective SCORAD from baseline to the final visit. The secondary outcome measures included the mean change in Investigator's Global Assessment score, patient's judgment of efficacy and patient's assessment of pruritus. Safety of EHA cream was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (35 in each group) were randomized and 57 were included in the final analysis set. Based on SCORAD measurements, patients using EHA cream achieved superior clinical improvement compared to the control group at 28 days (p < .001). EHA cream was also superior to the vehicle cream regarding all secondary outcome measures. Eight (23.5%) patients receiving EHA cream and two (5.7%) patients receiving vehicle cream experienced mild cutaneous adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS: In children 2-18 years old with mild-to-moderate AD, EHA cream was superior to vehicle cream, with minor AEs.

Phase 2 Trial of Topical Thykamine in Adults With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a common skin disorder for which there remains an unmet need for topical pharmacotherapies that are safe and effective. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of 3 dosages of PUR 0110 (Thykamine; Devonian Health Group Inc.) cream (0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.25%) compared to vehicle for treatment of adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of clear/almost clear and with a decrease from baseline score of at least 2 grades at day 29. Key secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline to day 29 in IGA, percent body surface area (%BSA) affected, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, pruritus, and quality of life. Safety outcomes included the incidence of local and systemic adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint was met with PUR 0110 cream 0.10% compared to vehicle (30.8% vs 6.7%, respectively, P=.014). Most secondary endpoints also favored PUR 0110 cream 0.10% vs vehicle, including change from baseline to day 29 in IGA score, %BSA affected, pruritus, and patient-reported quality of life. Adverse events occurred at a similar rate in all treatment groups; most were mild to moderate in intensity and were infrequently associated with study withdrawal. PUR 0110 cream 0.10% demonstrated rapid improvement in signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis. This observation, along with its favorable safety and tolerability profile, could make it a useful therapeutic option for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(10):1091-1097. doi:10.36849/JDD.6729.

Effectiveness and safety of lotion, cream, gel, and ointment emollients for childhood eczema: a pragmatic, randomised, phase 4, superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there are no trials comparing emollients commonly used for childhood eczema. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of the four main emollient types: lotions, creams, gels, and ointments. METHODS: We did a pragmatic, individually randomised, parallel group, phase 4 superiority trial in 77 general practice surgeries in England. Children aged between 6 months and 12 years with eczema (Patient Orientated Eczema Measure [POEM] score >2) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1; stratified by centre and minimised by baseline POEM score and age, using a web-based system) to lotions, creams, gels, or ointments. Clinicians and parents were unmasked. The initial emollient prescription was for 500 g or 500 mL, to be applied twice daily and as required. Subsequent prescriptions were determined by the family. The primary outcome was parent-reported eczema severity over 16 weeks (weekly POEM), with analysis as randomly assigned regardless of adherence, adjusting for baseline and stratification variables. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN84540529. FINDINGS: Between Jan 19, 2018, and Oct 31, 2019, 12 417 children were assessed for eligibility, 550 of whom were randomly assigned to a treatment group (137 to lotion, 140 to cream, 135 to gel, and 138 to ointment). The numbers of participants who contributed at least two POEM scores and were included in the primary analysis were 131 in the lotion group, 137 in the cream group, 130 in the gel group, and 126 in the ointment group. Baseline median age was 4 years (IQR 2-8); 255 (46%) participants were girls, 295 (54%) were boys; 473 (86%) participants were White; and the mean POEM score was 9·3 (SD 5·5). There was no difference in eczema severity between emollient types over 16 weeks (global p value=0·77), with adjusted POEM pairwise differences of: cream versus lotion 0·42 (95% CI -0·48 to 1·32), gel versus lotion 0·17 (-0·75 to 1·09), ointment versus lotion -0·01 (-0·93 to 0·91), gel versus cream -0·25 (-1·15 to 0·65), ointment versus cream -0·43 (-1·34 to 0·48), and ointment versus gel -0·18 (-1·11 to 0·75). This result remained unchanged following multiple imputation, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses. The total number of adverse events did not significantly differ between the treatment groups (lotions 49 [36%], creams 54 [39%], gels 54 [40%], and ointments 48 [35%]; p=0·79), although stinging was less common with ointments (12 [9%] of 138 participants) than lotions (28 [20%] of 137), creams (24 [17%] of 140), or gels (25 [19%] of 135). INTERPRETATION: We found no difference in effectiveness between the four main types of emollients for childhood eczema. Users need to be able to choose from a range of emollients to find one that they are more likely to use effectively. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Association of frequent moisturizer use in early infancy with the development of food allergy.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is thought to develop through transcutaneous sensitization, especially in the presence of skin barrier impairment and inflammation. Regular moisturizer application to infant skin could potentially promote transcutaneous sensitization and the development of food allergy. OBJECTIVES: We tested this hypothesis in the Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) study population. METHODS: The EAT study was a population-based randomized clinical trial conducted from January 15, 2008, to August 31, 2015, and recruited 1303 exclusively breastfed 3-month-old infants and their families from England and Wales. At enrollment at 3 months, families completed a questionnaire that included questions about frequency and type of moisturizer applied, use of corticosteroid creams, and parental report of dry skin or eczema. Infants were examined for visible eczema at the enrollment visit. RESULTS: A statistically significant dose-response relationship was observed between parent-reported moisturization frequency at 3 months of age and the subsequent development of food allergy. Each additional moisturization per week was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.13-1.27; P < .0005) for developing food allergy. For infants with no visible eczema at the enrollment visit, the corresponding adjusted odds ratio was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07-1.30; P = .001) and for those with eczema at the enrollment visit, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.11-1.31; P < .0005). Moisturizer frequency showed similar dose-response relationships with the development of both food and aeroallergen sensitization at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the notion that regular application of moisturizers to the skin of young infants may promote the development of food allergy through transcutaneous sensitization.

Developing a cosmetic series: Results from the ESSCA network, 2009-2018.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable variability across European patch test centres as to which allergens are included in local and national cosmetics series. OBJECTIVES: To propose a standardized, evidence-based cosmetic series for Europe based on up-to-date analysis of relevant contact allergens. METHODS: We collated data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) from 2009 to 2018 to determine which cosmetic allergens produce a high yield of contact allergy. Contact allergens with a prevalence of >0.3% that were considered relevant were included. Rare contact allergens were excluded if deemed no longer relevant or added to a supplemental cosmetic series for further analysis. RESULTS: Sensitization prevalences of 39 cosmetic contact allergens were tabulated. Thirty of these allergens yielded >0.3% positive reactions and are therefore included in our proposed European cosmetic series. Six were considered no longer relevant and therefore excluded. Three were included in a supplementary European cosmetic series. An additional nine allergens were included in either the core or supplemental European cosmetic series following literature review. CONCLUSION: We have derived a potential European cosmetic series based upon the above methods. This will require ongoing investigation based upon the changing exposure profiles of cosmetic allergens as well as new and evolving substances.

Isosorbide Di-(Linoleate/Oleate) Stimulates Prodifferentiation Gene Expression to Restore the Epidermal Barrier and Improve Skin Hydration.

The breakdown of the epidermal barrier and consequent loss of skin hydration is a feature of skin aging and eczematous dermatitis. Few treatments, however, resolve these underlying processes to provide full symptomatic relief. In this study, we evaluated isosorbide di-(linoleate/oleate) (IDL), which was generated by esterifying isosorbide with sunflower fatty acids. Topical effects of IDL in skin were compared with those of ethyl linoleate/oleate, which has previously been shown to improve skin barrier function. Both IDL and ethyl linoleate/oleate downregulated inflammatory gene expression, but IDL more effectively upregulated the expression of genes associated with keratinocyte differentiation (e.g., KRT1, GRHL2, SPRR4). Consistent with this, IDL increased the abundance of epidermal barrier proteins (FLG and involucrin) and prevented cytokine-mediated stratum corneum degradation. IDL also downregulated the expression of unhealthy skin signature genes linked to the loss of epidermal homeostasis and uniquely repressed an IFN-inducible coexpression module activated in multiple skin diseases, including psoriasis. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling females with dry skin, 2% IDL lotion applied over 2 weeks significantly improved skin hydration and decreased transepidermal water loss (NCT04253704). These results demonstrate mechanisms by which IDL improves skin hydration and epidermal barrier function, supporting IDL as an effective intervention for the treatment of xerotic pruritic skin.

Clinical Evaluation of a Nature-Based Bakuchiol Anti-Aging Moisturizer for Sensitive Skin.

BACKGROUND: Patients with sensitive skin find topical retinoid use for anti-aging purposes challenging due to irritation. Bakuchiol, a meroterpene from the Psoralea corylifolia seed, has retinol functionality through retinol-like regulation of gene expression. OBJECTIVE: This research examined the tolerability, efficacy, and barrier effects of a nature-based bakuchiol-containing cleanser and moisturizer in subjects with sensitive skin. METHODS: 60 female subjects Fitzpatrick skin types I–V age 40–65 years with sensitive mild to moderate photodamaged skin were enrolled in this 4 week study. A sensitive skin panel was constructed: 1/3 eczema/atopic dermatitis, 1/3 rosacea, 1/3 cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Subjects used a nature-based cleanser and moisturizer twice daily and underwent transepidermal water loss (TEWL), corneometry, tolerability assessments, and efficacy assessments at baseline, 5–10 minutes post-application, and week 4. RESULTS: The skin care products were well tolerated and efficacious (P<0.001) in terms of investigator assessed improvement in visual smoothness, tactile smoothness, clarity, radiance, overall appearance, and global anti-aging. Cheek corneometry measurements demonstrated a statistically significant 16% increase in skin moisture content (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A bakuchiol nature-based anti-aging moisturizer is well tolerated and effective in individuals with sensitive skin.J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(12): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5522.

Choosing the Right Partner: Complementing Prescription Acne Medication With Over-the-Counter Cleansers and Moisturizers.

BACKGROUND: Acne is the most common dermatological disorder. An impaired barrier function in acne vulgaris has been reported, as well as decreased amounts of epidermal ceramides. Also, many of the systemic and topical medications prescribed for the treatment of acne exacerbate these skin barrier disruptions and can lead to irritation and dry skin conditions. AIM: The review explored the importance of maximizing adjunctive skincare, such as over-the-counter products for managing acne and avoiding adverse effects. METHODS: A literature review was conducted and included clinical acne guidelines, clinical studies, and review articles on acne prevention, treatment, and maintenance. Searches were made in PubMed and Google Scholar for English-language literature published between Jan 1, 2010, and Apr 1, 2020. Two clinicians manually reviewed selected publications. RESULTS: Seventy-four articles were included in the analyses. A variety of specialized cleansers and moisturizers are available as suitable adjunctive therapies for acne-prone skin. Lipid-free cleansers were found to be the most appropriate type of cleanser for acne-prone skin as they were associated with a low risk of skin irritation, and a near-physiological stratum corneum pH. Moisturizers typically included ingredients such as humectants, emollients, oil absorbers, and those with anti-inflammatory and/or barrier replenishing properties. Given the various adjunctive products available, decision frameworks were created for clinicians to use when selecting over-the-counter cleansers and moisturizers for acne-prone patients. CONCLUSION: Informing clinicians about skin barrier dysfunction in acne and the benefits of adjunctive skincare may help them to choose the right product(s) to complement prescription therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(11): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5536.

Scented lotions may cause scaring and premature fading of tattoos.

Although tattoo artists provide tattoo aftercare instructions to their clients, recommendations are often not cost-effective or supported by evidence. A 22-year-old man developed a pruritic red rash over his healing tattoo one week after receiving the tattoo. Although multiple queries were negative, the patient did note use of a scented lotion before the eruption. We determined that allergic contact dermatitis from the scented lotion caused scarring and premature fading of the new tattoo. Tattoo artists should recommend avoidance of scented lotions and instruct clients to care for their new tattoo like a wound in their aftercare instructions.