Vertebral Body Erosions After Glue Embolization of an Aortic Endograft Type II Endoleak: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a case of a 66-year-old man with lumbar vertebral body erosions after glue embolization of a Type II endoleak secondary to endovascular repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Multiple biopsies of the affected vertebrae were culture-negative confirming no evidence of infection. He underwent posterior spinal fusion from L2 to L5 with complete resolution of mechanical low back pain and improved functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Vertebral body osseous erosion is a rare complication of aortic endoleak intervention that can be successfully treated with spinal fusion.

Abdominal aneurysm sac thrombus CT density and volume after EVAR: which association with underlying endoleak?

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyse abdominal aneurysm sac thrombus density and volume on computed tomography (CT) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR between January 2005 and December 2010 and had at least four follow-up CT exams available over the first five years of follow-up were included in this retrospective single-centre study. Thrombus density and aneurysm sac volume were calculated on unenhanced CT scans. Linear mixed models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Out of 82 patients, 44 (54%) had an endoleak on post-EVAR contrast-enhanced CT. Thrombus density significantly increased over time in both the endoleak and non-endoleak groups, with a slope of 0.159 UH/month (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.115-0.202), p < 0.0001) and 0.052 UH/month (95% CI 0.002-0.102, p = 0.041). In patients without endoleak, a significant decrease in aneurysm sac volume was identified over time (slope -0.891 cc/month, 95% CI -1.200 to -0.581); p < 0.001) compared to patients with endoleak (slope 0.284 cc/month, 95% CI -0.031 to 0.523, p = 0.082). The association between thrombus density and aneurysm sac volume was positive in the endoleak group (slope 1.543 UH/cc, 95% CI 0.948-2.138, p < 0.001) and negative in the non-endoleak group (slope -1.450 UH/cc, 95% CI -2.326 to -0.574, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We observed a progressive increase in thrombus density of the aneurysm sac after EVAR in patients with and without endoleak, more pronounced in patients with endoleak. The association between aneurysm volume and thrombus density was positive in patients with and negative in those without endoleak. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A progressive increase in thrombus density and volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac on unenhanced CT might suggest underlying endoleak lately after EVAR. KEY POINTS: Thrombus density of the aneurysm sac after EVAR increased over time. Progressive increase in thrombus density was significantly associated to the underlying endoleak. The association between aneurysm volume and thrombus density was positive in patients with and negative in those without endoleak.

Jejunal ischaemia following inferior mesenteric artery angioembolisation for type 2 endoleak.

We present a rare case of short-segment jejunal infarction following inferior mesenteric artery embolisation for type 2 endoleak in a patient who previously underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Potential causes for the event might include thromboembolism or traumatic thrombosis of a jejunal branch of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) caused by a buddy guide wire used to maintain the position of the long vascular sheath in the SMA hiatus. The condition was recognised on CT and treated with resection of the infarcted segment of the small bowel followed by primary anastomosis.

Low energy virtual monochromatic CT with deep learning image reconstruction to improve delineation of endoleaks.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the utility of low-energy virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) combined with deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in improving the delineation of endoleaks (ELs) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT (DECT). METHODS: A total of 61 consecutive patients (mean age, 77 years; 46 men) after EVAR who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT were enrolled. Virtual monochromatic 40- and 70-keV images were reconstructed using DLIR (TrueFidelity-H) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the EL on the venous-phase CT was calculated. Four different reconstructed image series (hybrid IR and DLIR at two energy levels, 40- and 70-keV) were displayed side-by-side and visually assessed for EL conspicuity on a 5-point comparative scale from 0 (best) to -4 (significantly inferior). Two experienced radiologists independently conducted a qualitative evaluation of the CT images. RESULTS: A total of 30 out of 61 patients presented with an EL. On both 40- and 70-keV images, the CNR of the EL was significantly higher in DLIR than in hybrid IR (40-keV, 14.5 ± 7.3 vs 8.6 ± 4.2, P<0.001; 70-keV, 8.7 ± 4.5 vs 5.5 ± 2.6, P<0.001). The comparative scale of EL conspicuity in the 40-keV DLIR images (Observer1, -0.2 ± 0.4; Observer2, 0.0 ± 0.0) was significantly higher than 40-keV hybrid IR (Observer1, -0.5 ± 0.5; Observer2, -1.0 ± 0.0; P<0.05), 70-keV DLIR (Observer1, -1.8 ± 0.4; Observer2, -2.0 ± 0.0; P<0.001) and 70-keV hybrid IR images (Observer1, -1.8 ± 0.4; Observer2, -2.4 ± 0.5; P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using 40-keV VMI in combination with DLIR improves EL delineation after EVAR compared with the 70-keV VMI with hybrid IR or DLIR.

Detection of Endoleak after Endovascular Aortic Repair through Deep Learning Based on Non-contrast CT.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a deep learning model for detecting post-endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) endoleak from non-contrast CT. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 245 patients who underwent EVAR between September 2016 and December 2022. All patients underwent both non-enhanced and enhanced follow-up CT. The presence of endoleak was evaluated based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and radiology reports. First, the aneurysm sac was segmented, and radiomic features were extracted on non-contrast CT. Statistical analysis was conducted to investigate differences in shape and density characteristics between aneurysm sacs with and without endoleak. Subsequently, a deep learning model was trained to generate predicted segmentation of the endoleak. A binary decision was made based on whether the model produced a segmentation to detect the presence of endoleak. The absence of a predicted segmentation indicated no endoleak, while the presence of a predicted segmentation indicated endoleak. Finally, the performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the predicted segmentation with the reference segmentation obtained from CTA. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: This study finally included 85 patients with endoleak and 82 patients without endoleak. Compared to patients without endoleak, patients with endoleak had higher CT values and greater dispersion. The AUC in validation group was 0.951, dice similarity coefficient was 0.814, sensitivity was 0.877, and specificity was 0.884. CONCLUSION: This deep learning model based on non-contrast CT can detect endoleak after EVAR with high sensitivity.

Multicenter CT Image-Based Anatomic Assessment of Patients with Aortoiliac Aneurysm Undergoing Endovascular Repair with Iliac Branch Devices.

BACKGROUND: The Global Iliac Branch Study (NCT05607277) is an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of anatomic predictors of adverse iliac events (AIEs) in aortoiliac aneurysms treated with iliac branch devices (IBDs). METHODS: Patients with pre-IBD and post-IBD computed tomography imaging were included. We measured arterial diameters, stenosis, calcification, bifurcation angles, and tortuosity indices using a standardized, validated protocol. A composite of ipsilateral AIE was defined, a priori, as occlusion, type I or III endoleak, device constriction, or clinical event requiring reintervention. Paired t-test compared tortuosity indices and splay angles pretreatment and post-treatment for all IBDs and by device material (stainless steel and nitinol). Two-sample t-test compared anatomical changes from pretreatment to post-treatment by device material. Logistic regression assessed associations between AIE and anatomic measurements. Analysis was performed by IBD. RESULTS: We analyzed 297 patients (286 males, 11 females) with 331 IBDs (227 stainless steel, 104 nitinol). Median clinical follow-up was 3.8 years. Iliac anatomy was significantly straightened with all IBD treatment, though stainless steel IBDs had a greater reduction in total iliac artery tortuosity index and aortic splay angle compared to nitinol IBDs (absolute reduction -0.20 [-0.22 to -0.18] vs. -0.09 [-0.12 to -0.06], P < 0.0001 and -19.6° [-22.4° to -16.9°] vs. -11.2° [-15.3° to -7.0°], P = 0.001, respectively). There were 54 AIEs in 44 IBDs in 42 patients (AIE in 13.3% of IBD systems), requiring 35 reinterventions (median time to event 41 days; median time to reintervention 153 days). There were 18 endoleaks, 29 occlusions, and 5 device constrictions. There were no strong associations between anatomic measurements and AIE overall, though internal iliac diameter was inversely associated with AIE in nitinol devices (nAIE, nitinol = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Purpose-built IBDs effectively treat aortoiliac disease, including that with tortuous anatomy, with a high patency rate (91.5%) and low reintervention rate (9.1%) at 4 years. Anatomic predictors of AIE are limited.

Postdissection aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: Aneurysm sac changes after fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FBEVAR) for postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAs) are poorly understood. Partial thrombosis of the false lumen and endoleaks may impair sac regression. To characterize sac changes after FBEVAR for PD-TAAs, this study examined midterm results and predictors for sac enlargement. METHODS: FBEVARs performed for PD-TAAs in 10 physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies from 2008 to 2023 were analyzed. The maximum aortic aneurysm diameter was compared between the 30-day computed tomography angiogram and follow-up imaging studies. Aneurysm sac enlargement was defined as an increase in diameter of ≥5 mm. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to evaluate sac enlargement and midterm FBEVAR outcomes. RESULTS: Among 3296 FBEVARs, 290 patients (72.4% male; median age, 68.4 years) were treated for PD-TAAs. Most aneurysms treated were extent II (72%) and III (12%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 66.5 ± 11.2 mm. Mortality at 30 days was 1.4%. At a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 1.9 years, at least one follow-up imaging study revealed sac enlargement in 43 patients (15%), sac regression in 115 patients (40%), and neither enlargement nor regression in 137 (47%); 5 (2%) demonstrated both expansion and regression during follow-up. Freedom from aneurysm sac enlargement was 93%, 82%, and 80% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Overall, endoleaks were detected in 27 patients (63%) with sac enlargement and 143 patients (58%) without enlargement (P = .54). Sac enlargement was significantly more frequent among older patients (mean age at the index procedure, 70.2 ± 8.9 years vs 66.5 ± 11 years; P = .04) and those with type II endoleaks at 1 year (74% vs 52%; P = .031). Cox regression revealed age >70 years at baseline (hazard ratio [HR], 2.146; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.167-3.944; P = .010) and presence of type II endoleak at 1 year (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.07-4.79; P = .032) were independent predictors of sac enlargement. Patient survival was 92%, 81%, and 68% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Cumulative target vessel instability was 7%, and aneurysm-related mortality was 2% at 5 years. At least 42% of patients required secondary interventions. Sac enlargement did not affect patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm sac enlargement occurs in 15% of patients after FBEVAR for PD-TAAs. Elderly patients (>70 years at baseline) and those with type II endoleaks at 1 year may need closer monitoring and secondary interventions to prevent sac enlargement. Despite sac enlargement in some patients, aneurysm-related mortality at 5 years remains low and overall survival was not associated with sac enlargement.

Impact of Isolated Type 2 Endoleak on Subsequent Cardiovascular Events and Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Assess subsequent cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) according to the existence of isolated endoleak type 2 (EL2) at 1 year after EVAR implantation. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included patients treated with EVAR between 2010 and 2017 in the vascular surgery department of the University Hospital of Lyon with an infrarenal AAA > 50 mm. The baseline clinical characteristics collected just before EVAR were retrieved from electronic patient records of our institution. AAA characteristics, procedure, and the 1-year postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) were reported. Study end points, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse lower-extremity events (MALE), and all-cause mortality were recorded during follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of isolated EL2 (EL2 +) or absence (EL2 -) of any endoleak on CTA at 1 year. MACE, MALE, and all-cause mortality were compared between both groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 589 patients were treated by endovascular surgery and 207 were included. According to the CTA results at 1 year, 60 patients (29%) were included in the EL2 + group and 147 patients (71%) in the EL2 - group. A total of 109 patients (53%) experienced a MACE or MALE; significantly fewer patients in the EL2 + than in the EL2 - group did so (P = 0.009). There were 47 patients (23%) who experienced at least 1 MALE, and the frequency was significantly lower in the EL2 + group (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AAA treated by EVAR who did not develop EL2 at 1 year were at higher risk of MALE during follow-up. This might be explained by more frequent symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease at baseline in this group. These patients therefore require a closer follow-up and strict control of cardiovascular risk factors to prevent cardiovascular morbi-mortality.

Retrospective Cohort Study on EVAR Open Surgical Conversion: Focus on Endoleaks With Wrong Preoperative Categorization.

BACKGROUND: Late open conversion (LOC) following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a rare complication with a high morbidity and mortality and is often proposed as the last line of treatment after failure of endovascular reintervention of any type. This study aimed to highlights the limitations of EVAR follow-up imaging in characterizing endoleaks, which may contribute to the failure of endovascular reinterventions and lead to LOC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited all EVAR implanted in Amiens University Hospital (France) between January 2008 and December 2022. Elective LOC was defined as surgical conversion >1 month after EVAR. The primary endpoint was the rate of wrong categorization of endoleaks by follow-up exams before LOC. Secondary endpoints were the morbidity and the mortality associated with LOC. RESULTS: Seven hundred eight EVARs were performed in our institution, 30 required elective LOC. Twenty-five of them were treated for sac enlargement due to an endoleak (83.3%) (all types). Wrong categorization of the endoleak was noted in 13 patients (52.2%). Twelve of these recategorizations involved the preoperative diagnosis of a type II endoleaks (92.3%). The change in categorization in 7 out of 12 cases (58%) was in favor of a type I endoleak, other recategorization included 1 type III (8%) and 4 type IV (33%). One patient died during the 30-day postoperative period and 7 patients (28%) presented a major complication; the median length of stay was 13 days (interquartile range 9-21). CONCLUSIONS: Routine follow-up examinations such as angioscanner and contrast Doppler ultrasound appear to be limited in their ability to categorize the type of persistent endoleak, which may increase the number of patients requiring LOC. New precision diagnostic imaging techniques, such as dynamic examinations, need to be developed to limit the need for LOC.

Correlation Between Calcium Scoring and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aneurysm repair, though minimally invasive and has the benefit of relatively low perioperative complication rates, it is associated with significant long term reintervention rates related to endoleaks. Several variables have been studied to predict the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair, 1 of which is the calcium burden of the vasculature. This prompted us to study the association between calcium burden measured by the standardized Agatston scoring system and the outcomes of Endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent Endovascular aneurysm repair from 2008 to 2020 at our institution and who had a non-contrast computerized tomography scan preoperatively, accounting for 87 patients. The calcium burden of the vasculature was measured by the Agatston scoring system allowing for better reproducibility, and the outcome variables included mortality and endoleaks. RESULTS: Patients with higher median total calcium scores (≥12966.9) had significantly lesser survival (79.8% vs 52.3% (P = .002) at five years compared to patients with lower median total calcium score (<12966.9). Also, patients with type 2 endoleaks had higher calcium scores in above the aneurysm level ((1591.2 vs 688.2), P = .05)) compared to patients with no type 2 endoleaks. CONCLUSION: Calcium score assigned using a standardized Agatston scoring system can be used as a predictor of mortality risk assisting in deciding the treatment of choice for patients.

Transarterial Embolisation of Abdominal Aortic Type II Endoleaks Accessed via the Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery: A Case Series and Literature Review.

We report our technique and experience treating 3 patients with native abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac expansion following EVAR, who were managed with transarterial embolisation via the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA). In this case series, we demonstrate that transarterial embolisation via the DCIA is a feasible and safe treatment option. The DCIA should be routinely interrogated with angiography as not only a cause of possible Type II endoleak, but also to identify a potential access route to the abdominal aortic sac for interventional treatment.

Prediction of endovascular leaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair though machine learning applied to pre-procedural computed tomography angiographs.

To predict endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) we submitted patient characteristics and vessel features observed on pre- operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) to machine-learning. We evaluated 1-year follow-up CT scans (arterial and delayed phases) in patients who underwent TEVAR for the presence or absence of an endoleak. We evaluated the effect of machine learning of the patient age, sex, weight, and height, plus 22 vascular features on the ability to predict post-TEVAR endoleaks. The extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for ML system was trained on 14 patients with- and 131 without endoleaks. We calculated their importance by applying XGBoost to machine learning and compared our findings between with those of conventional vessel measurement-based methods such as the 22 vascular features by using the Pearson correlation coefficients. Pearson correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval (CI) were r = 0.86 and 0.75 to 0.92 for the machine learning, r = - 0.44 and - 0.56 to - 0.29 for the vascular angle, and r = - 0.19 and - 0.34 to - 0.02 for the diameter between the subclavian artery and the aneurysm (Fig. 3a-c, all: p < 0.05). With machine-learning, the univariate analysis was significant higher compared with the vascular angle and in the diameter between the subclavian artery and the aneurysm such as the conventional methods (p < 0.05). To predict the risk for post-TEVAR endoleaks, machine learning was superior to the conventional vessel measurement method when factors such as patient characteristics, and vascular features (vessel length, diameter, and angle) were evaluated on pre-TEVAR thoracic CTA images.

Implications and late outcomes of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Type II endoleaks (T2ELs) are the most common cause of reintervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Although most resolve spontaneously, the long-term implications of T2ELs remain elusive. We aim to evaluate the impact of persistent and late T2ELs on clinical outcomes after EVAR. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent EVAR for degenerative infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and June 2022 with no type I (T1EL) or III (T3EL) endoleak seen at EVAR completion. Patients were categorized based on T2EL status. Group 1 included patients with never detected or transient T2ELs (detected at EVAR completion but not after). Group 2 encompassed persistent T2ELs (seen at EVAR completion and again during follow-up) and late T2ELs (detected for the first time at any point during follow-up). Time-to-event analysis was conducted using a time-dependent approach to T2EL status. Primary outcomes included freedom from sac enlargement (SE), aneurysm-related reinterventions, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 803 patients met inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 418 patients (52%), of which 85% had no T2ELs and 15% had transient T2ELs. Group 2 had 385 patients; 23% had persistent T2ELs, and 77% developed a new T2EL. Patients in group 1 had a higher prevalence of smoking (88% vs 83%; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (33% vs 25%; P = .008), chronic kidney disease (13% vs 8%; P = .021), and a higher mean Society for Vascular Surgery score (7 vs 6 points; P = .049). No differences were found in aneurysm diameter or morphology. Mean follow-up was 5 years for the entire cohort. In Group 2, 58 patients (15%) underwent T2EL treatment, most commonly transarterial embolization. At 10 years after EVAR, Group 2 was associated with lower freedom from SE (P < .001) and abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reinterventions (P < .001) and comparable overall survival (P = .42). More T1ELs were detected during follow-up in Group 2 (6 [1%] vs 20 [5%]; P = .004), with 15 (75%) of these detected at a median of 3 years after the T2EL. No difference between groups was observed in explant (0.7% vs 2.1%; P = .130) or aneurysm rupture (0.5% vs 1.3%; P = .269) rates. CONCLUSIONS: One-half of patients treated with infrarenal EVAR developed persistent/late T2ELs, which are associated with a higher risk of SE and reinterventions. No difference in overall survival or aneurysm rupture risk was seen at 10 years, based on T2EL status or T2EL intervention. A conservative approach to T2ELs may be appropriate for most patients with absent T1ELs or T3ELs.

Pre-emptive Aortic Side Branch Embolization during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Excluder Stent-Graft System: A Prospective Multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pre-emptive transcatheter arterial embolization (P-TAE) for aortic side branches (ASBs) to prevent Type 2 endoleaks (EL2) before endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Excluder stent-graft system (Excluder). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study, 80 patients (mean age, 79.1 years [SD ± 6.7]; 85.0% were men; mean aneurysmal sac diameter, 48.4 mm [SD ± 7.4]) meeting the eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled from 9 hospitals. Before EVAR, P-TAE was performed to embolize the patent ASBs originating from the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed at 1 month and 6 months after EVAR. The primary endpoint was EL2 incidence at 6 months, and the secondary endpoints were aneurysmal sac diameter changes at 6 and 12 months, P-TAE outcomes, adverse events related to P-TAE, reintervention, and aneurysm-related mortality. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent P-TAE without serious. Coil embolization was successful in 81.6% of ASBs. EL2 incidence at 6 months was identified in 18 of 70 (25.7%) patients. Aneurysmal sac diameter shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed in 30.0% of patients at 6 months and in 40.9% at 12 months. Only 1 patient required reintervention for EL2 within 1 year of EVAR; aneurysm-related deaths were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: P-TAE for ASBs before EVAR using Excluder is a safe and effective strategy. It aids in achieving early aneurysmal sac shrinkage and reduces EL2 reintervention at 1 year after EVAR.