Multisocieties position paper: Microbiological surveillance on flexible endoscopes.

Transmission with endoscopes, particularly duodenoscope, of potential lethal infections prompted different scientific societies to deliver recommendations aimed reducing this risk. Some International societies extended recommendations on microbial surveillance to all the endoscopes and devices used in the reprocessing procedure. Considering the relevance of the topic, 8 Italian scientific societies of physicians, nurses and technical operators prepared a concerted document taking into account Institutional advisories and facilities in Italy. The rules for a correct microbial surveillance on endoscopes were detailed in term of what, how and when to perform the procedure, also suggesting behaviors in case of contamination.

Cutting-Edge Technologies for Gastrointestinal Therapeutic Endoscopy.

With advancements in the development of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic devices and the increased demand for minimally invasive treatments, the indications of therapeutic endoscopy have been expanded. Methods of endoscopic treatment used for tissue removal, hemostasis, and dilatation are as follows. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the gold standard curative method for removal of gastrointestinal node-negative neoplasms, regardless of their size or the presence of ulcer formation. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), which incorporates ESD, was introduced for removal of lesions in deeper layers. Another technique is endoscopic full-thickness resection, which is challenging without the assistance of laparoscopy. In terms of hemostasis, management of iatrogenic bleeding after endoscopic treatment is an important issue. Shielding methods and suturing techniques have been introduced for large mucosal defects after ESD, and their efficacy has been investigated clinically. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a new alternative surgical approach for minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia. Furthermore, endoscopic fundoplication after POEM was devised to prevent post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease. Many endoscopic treatments, including ESD, LECS, and POEM, have been introduced in Japan. With the aging of the population, more attention will be directed toward therapeutic endoscopy for elderly patients, because it is less invasive. Development of endoscopic treatments with expanded indications is expected.

Motorised spiral enteroscopy: first prospective clinical feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: Currently available methods for small bowel endoscopy are often time consuming; motorised PowerSpiral Enteroscopy (PSE) is a further development of spiral enteroscopy to facilitate the approach to the small bowel. The aim of this bicentric prospective trial was to study feasibility and yield of peroral PSE. DESIGN: Consecutive patients with suspected small bowel disease and indication for antegrade enteroscopy were included in two tertiary referral centres. Primary objective was diagnostic yield of antegrade PSE. Secondary objectives included technical success (defined as successful endoscope insertion at least to ligament of Treitz), depth of maximum insertion (DMI), median insertion time to DMI, rate of therapeutic procedures and adverse events. RESULTS: During a 30-month period, 140 procedures were performed on 132 patients (58 female, 74 male; median age: 68 (20-100) years) under general anaesthesia. Overall diagnostic yield of PSE was 74.2%; with 68.2% of procedures including some form of endotherapy. Technical success rate of PSE was 97%; median DMI was 450 cm (0-600) with a median insertion time to DMI of 25 min (3-122). Antegrade panenteroscopy to the cecum was achieved in 14 cases (10.6%). Overall adverse event (AE) rate was 14.4%; two major serious AEs occurred (1.5%), one delayed perforation, one bleeding from Mallory-Weiss lesion. CONCLUSION: This pilot clinical trial demonstrates that PSE is effective for diagnostic and therapeutic antegrade enteroscopy and may compare favourably with traditional methods of deep enteroscopy in ease of use and procedural duration. More comparative data are required to assess clinical application and safety of PSE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02965209.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidance on Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes: Lessons Learned from Outbreaks, Infection Control.

Flexible endoscopes require cleaning, high-level disinfection, and sterilization between each patient use to reduce risk of transmitting pathogens. Public health investigations have identified concerns, including endoscope damage, mishandling, and reprocessing deficiencies, placing patients at risk for transmission of bacterial, viral, and other pathogens. Findings from outbreak investigations and other studies have led to innovations in endoscope design, use, and reprocessing, yet infection risks related to contaminated or damaged endoscopes remain. Strict adherence to infection control guidelines and manufacturer instructions for use, utilization of supplemental guidance, and training and oversight of reprocessing personnel, reduce risk of pathogen transmission by flexible endoscopes.

The Endoscopy Patient as a Vector and Victim.

Patient and procedural factors can increase the risk of infectious adverse events during endoscopy. Prophylactic antibiotic use must be judicious and individualized in the era of antibiotic resistance. New and emerging procedures require high-quality studies to elucidate appropriate risk profiles.

Nosocomial outbreak linked to a flexible gastrointestinal endoscope contaminated with an amikacin-resistant ST17 clone of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Endoscope contamination is infrequent but can be the source of nosocomial infections and outbreaks. In August 2016, an unexpected increase in the incidence of amikacin-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates (AK-Pae) was observed at a tertiary care center in the south of Spain. An epidemiological and microbiological investigation (August-October 2016) was performed to explain this finding. Isolates from clinical and environmental samples (2 endoscopes used for retrograde cholangiopancreatography; ERCP) were identified by MALDI-TOF. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the MicroScan system. Whole-Genome-Sequencing (Miseq, Illumina) was performed to determine the resistome and virulome. Clonal relatedness among isolates was assessed by SpeI-PFGE and MLST. A Caenorhabditis elegans killing assay was performed for virulence testing. Biofilm formation was performed using a colorimetric assay. Four of the 5 patients infected and/or colonized with AK-Pae in August 2016 had undergone ERCP ≤5 days before sample collection. Two endoscopes were contaminated with AK-Pae. Isolates from one endoscope showed an identical PFGE pattern to 9 isolates (cluster I) and differed (1-2 bands) to 5 isolates (cluster II). Isolates from these clusters belonged to the ST17 clone. This S17 clone was characterized by its low virulence in the C. elegans killing assay, and its biofilm-forming ability, slightly superior to that of high-risk clones of P. aeruginosa ST175 and ST235. This outbreak was caused by an endoscope used for ERCP contaminated with an invasive, moderately virulent, biofilm-forming AK-Pae ST17 clone, suggesting the possible emergence of a new high-risk lineage of this clone.

Endoscope presence during endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) influences FLIP metrics in the evaluation of esophageal dysmotility.

BACKGROUND: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) system is an FDA-approved tool for dynamic evaluation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Even though commercially available since 2009, FLIP utilization remains low, partly due to lack of consensus in methodology and interpretation. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the influence of concurrent endoscopy on FLIP measurements. METHODS: In this single-center study, we reviewed data from 93 patients undergoing FLIP for symptomatic esophageal motility disorders between 2016 and 2018. During sedated endoscopy, we measured luminal values (distensibility, cross-sectional area (CSA), and balloon pressure) at the EGJ and distal esophagus using 30, 40, and 50 mL distension volumes, with and without concurrent endoscope presence. All recorded values were compared at the various distension volumes between the two measurements using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. KEY RESULTS: There was a significant difference in distensibility and CSA with index distension volume (40 mL) at the EGJ comparing the two measurements: Lower median distensibility was 2.1 mm2  mm Hg-1 in the group with concurrent inserted endoscope, respectively, 3.4 mm2  mm Hg-1 without endoscope (P < .001), and median CSA was 86.0 resp. 110.0 mm2 (P < .001). No significant difference could be found in the measurements of the distal esophagus. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Our results show a significant difference in FLIP measurements with and without endoscope presence. This underlines the importance of establishing a consensus of a standardized FLIP protocol to define normal luminal values and guiding future FLIP diagnostic studies.

Evaluation of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short type double balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a single-center retrospective study of 1,576 procedures.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using balloon-assisted endoscope such as double-balloon endoscope is even effective for patients with surgically altered anatomy. Yet comprehensive studies on complications of ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscope have not been made. We analyzed the characteristics and the causes of complications of ERCP using double-balloon endoscope (DB-ERCP) procedures and aimed to suggest effective managements. METHODS: A total of 1576 procedures of DB-ERCP in 714 patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy in our hospital were evaluated retrospectively using a statistic analysis. RESULTS: The overall complication occurrence rate was 5.8%. By type of complications are perforation 3.2%, mucosal laceration 0.5%, hemorrhage 1.0%, pancreatitis 0.6%, respiratory disorder 0.4%, and others 0.2%. By type of surgical reconstruction methods were Roux-en-Y reconstruction with choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 4.2%, Roux-en-Y reconstruction without choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 6.7%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.5%, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.2%, Billroth II gastrectomy (B-II) 11.6%, and other reconstruction method (others) 7.4%. The contributing factors calculated by a multivariate analysis were B-II (odds ratio: 1.864, 95% confidence interval: 1.001-3.471, P = 0.050) and the presence of naïve papilla (odds ratio: 3.268, 95% confidence interval: 1.426-7.490, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: DB-ERCP is a safe method with a total complication rate of 5.8% that could be considered within an acceptable range. The most common complication was the injury of the digestive tract such as perforation. Affecting risk factors for complications were B-II and the presence of naïve papilla. DB-ERCP procedures should be performed carefully of these factors.

Single-session esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound using a forward-viewing radial scan ultrasonic endoscope.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound is useful for obtaining high-resolution images of pancreaticobiliary diseases, but is not readily available for physical checkups. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-session esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of upper-gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary diseases using a forward-viewing radial scan ultrasonic endoscope. METHODS: A total of 148 patients who were scheduled for upper-gastrointestinal screening using an endoscope were prospectively included. All patients were examined by EUS in combination with EGD using a forward-viewing radial scan ultrasonic endoscope. The primary endpoint was the safety of the procedures. The secondary endpoints were the prevalence of diseases, the basal imaging capability of EUS, the procedure time, total dose of propofol, and the correlation between background factors and the prevalence of pancreatic disease. The imaging capability at each region was scored as 0 (invisible) to 2 (sufficient visualization to evaluate the organs). RESULTS: Intraoperative hypotension occurred as an adverse event of intravenous anesthesia in one patient. There were 82 pancreaticobiliary findings and 165 upper-gastrointestinal findings (malignancy not included). Follicular lymphoma of the intra-abdominal lymph nodes was detected in one patient. The mean imaging scores of each section were 1.95 (pancreatic head and papilla), 2.0 (pancreatic body), 1.99 (pancreatic tail), and 1.89 (common bile duct and gallbladder). Age, history of diabetes mellitus, and smoking history were significantly associated with the prevalence of pancreatic diseases. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous performance of EGD and EUS using a new ultrasonic endoscope is tolerable and safe for upper-gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary screening.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A single center experience.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) is an aggressive malignancy causing a lot of fatalities and comorbidities. Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) is mostly needed for ECC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for the overall survival (OS) and the factors predicting the patients eligible for chemotherapy after EBS in ECC.We retrospectively screened 153 advanced ECC patients who underwent EBS for jaundice to make the patients eligible for chemotherapy. Patient's clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. All parameters were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis to predict which patients are eligible for chemotherapy.The median OS of all patients was 12.0 months (10.1-13.8). The median OS of the patients treated with chemotherapy was 13.0 months (12.0-14.0), while it was 4.0 months (2.3-5.7) for patients unable for chemotherapy after EBS. Albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (ALT) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) values were independent prognostic factors for OS. Higher albumin and lower prothrombin time (PT) levels were independent parameters to predict the patients eligible for chemotherapy after EBS.Being suitable for chemotherapy was the main determinant for prolonged survival and albumin and PT levels were independent predictors for chemotherapy eligibility after EBS. Albumin, ALT, and CA 19-9 values were independent prognostic factors for OS in ECC.

Iatrogenic Gastrointestinal Perforation Following Therapeutic Endoscopic Procedures: Management and Outcome.

The aim of this study was to analyze the location, the cause and treatment of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations following therapeutic endoscopic procedures. Perforation occurred in 12 patients out of 3,389, giving cases occurred intraoperatively or postoperatively. Among them, 6 cases were closed by titanium clipping and 1 case by purse string suture. In another case after cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRC), attempted titanium clipping failed, emergency surgery had to be performed. One each case, after Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and case after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR), recovered well spontaneously. In two cases, titanium clips fell off endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) resulting in delayed perforation, required surgery. Key factors for preventing and managing the perforation of endoscopic treatment, include the choice of endoscopic approach, processing method of perforation, detail processing in endoscopic therapy, proficient degree of operators and psychological quality.

Infectious complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy and their prevention.

Gastrointestinal endoscopes are medical devices that have been associated with outbreaks of health care-associated infections. Because of the severity and limited treatment options of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considerable attention has been paid to detection and prevention of these post-endoscopic outbreaks. Endoscope reprocessing involves cleaning, high-level disinfection/sterilization followed by rinsing and drying before storage. Failure of the decontamination process implies the risk of settlement of biofilm producing species in endoscope channels. This review covers the infectious complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy and their prevention and highlights the problem of infection risk associated with different steps of endoscope reprocessing.

Tratamiento actual para el divertículo de Zenker / Current treatment of Zenker´s diverticulum

Introducción: la cirugía es el tratamiento de elección para los divertículos de Zenker, pero existen diferencias en relación con el acceso a utilizar: abierto o endoscópico. Objetivo: comparar los resultados del tratamiento quirúrico del divertículo de Zenker de acuerdo con el acceso utilizado. Métodos: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en PubMed/Medline con las palabras: divertículo, Zenker, faringoesofágico, cricofaríngeo, diverticulectomía, diverticulopexia, diverticulotomía, diverticulostomía publicados entre 2006 y 2016. Se incluyeron estudios con más de 40 casos, comparativos o no, en los idiomas inglés, español, portugués, francés e italiano. Las variables estudiadas fueron: indicaciones quirúrgicas, recidiva del divertículo, tiempo quirúrgico, tiempo para la alimentación oral, estadía hospitalaria, reoperaciones, complicaciones, mejoría de los síntomas y mortalidad. Resultados: no se encontraron ensayos aleatrorizados. Se incluyeron cuatro revisiones sistemáticas y un metanálisis, además de un grupo de estudios que comparan los accesos peroral y transcervical y otros que comparan los resultados entre diferentes técnicas de los accesos endoscópico y convencional. La mayoría de los estudios son de carácter retrospectivo.Para evaluar los resultados a largo plazo se tomaron los artículos con seguimiento mayor de 12 meses. Conclusiones: con el acceso abierto se logran mejores resultados a largo plazo, pero tiene más complicaciones inmediatas. Es preferible usarlo en pacientes jóvenes y cuando existen condiciones anatómicas desfavorables para la endoscopia. El tratamiento endoscópico constituye una opción adecuada para pacientes de alto riesgo quirúrgico y anestésico(AU)

Introduction: Surgery is the treatment of choice in Zenker´s diverticula, but there are different opinions about the access to be used, that is, open or endoscopic. Objective: To compare the results of the surgical treatment results of Zenker´s diverticulum according to the access employed. Methods: A literature review was made in PubMed/Medline using the keywords: diverticulum, Zenker, pharyngoesophageal, crycopharyngeal, diverticulectomy, diverticulopexy, diverticulotomy, diverticulostomy in articles published from 2006 to 2016. There were included several studies of more than 40 cases, either comparative or not in English, Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese languages. The studied variables were surgical indications, recurrence, surgical time, length of time for oral feeding, hospital stay, reoperations, complications, symptoms improvement and mortality. Results: Randomized studies were not found. Four systematic reviews, one meta-analysis, comparative studies on perioral and transcervical access and others which compare the results of the endoscopic and of the conventional access were all included. Most of them were retrospective. For evaluation of long-term results, those articles with follow-up periods over 12 months were taken. Conclusions: The open access provides better long-term results, but it has more immediate complications. It is advisable to use it in young patients and when anatomic conditions are unfavorable for the endoscopic treatment. Finally, the endoscopic treatment is an adequate choice for patients with high surgical and anesthetic risk(AU)

Tratamiento actual para el divertículo de Zenker / Current treatment of Zenker´s diverticulum

Introducción: la cirugía es el tratamiento de elección para los divertículos de Zenker, pero existen diferencias en relación con el acceso a utilizar: abierto o endoscópico.Objetivo: comparar los resultados del tratamiento quirúrico del divertículo de Zenker de acuerdo con el acceso utilizado. Métodos: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en PubMed/Medline con las palabras: divertículo, Zenker, faringoesofágico, cricofaríngeo, diverticulectomía, diverticulopexia, diverticulotomía, diverticulostomía publicados entre 2006 y 2016. Se incluyeron estudios con más de 40 casos, comparativos o no, en los idiomas inglés, español, portugués, francés e italiano. Las variables estudiadas fueron: indicaciones quirúrgicas, recidiva del divertículo, tiempo quirúrgico, tiempo para la alimentación oral, estadía hospitalaria, reoperaciones, complicaciones, mejoría de los síntomas y mortalidad. Resultados: no se encontraron ensayos aleatrorizados. Se incluyeron cuatro revisiones sistemáticas y un metanálisis, además de un grupo de estudios que comparan los accesos peroral y transcervical y otros que comparan los resultados entre diferentes técnicas de los accesos endoscópico y convencional. La mayoría de los estudios son de carácter retrospectivo.Para evaluar los resultados a largo plazo se tomaron los artículos con seguimiento mayor de 12 meses. Conclusiones: con el acceso abierto se logran mejores resultados a largo plazo, pero tiene más complicaciones inmediatas. Es preferible usarlo en pacientes jóvenes y cuando existen condiciones anatómicas desfavorables para la endoscopia. El tratamiento endoscópico constituye una opción adecuada para pacientes de alto riesgo quirúrgico y anestésico(AU)

Introduction: Surgery is the treatment of choice in Zenker´s diverticula, but there are different opinions about the access to be used, that is, open or endoscopicObjective: To compare the results of the surgical treatment results of Zenker´s diverticulum according to the access employed. Methods: A literature review was made in PubMed/Medline using the keywords: diverticulum, Zenker, pharyngoesophageal, crycopharyngeal, diverticulectomy, diverticulopexy, diverticulotomy, diverticulostomy in articles published from 2006 to 2016. There were included several studies of more than 40 cases, either comparative or not in English, Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese languages. The studied variables were surgical indications, recurrence, surgical time, length of time for oral feeding, hospital stay, reoperations, complications, symptoms improvement and mortality. Results: Randomized studies were not found. Four systematic reviews, one meta-analysis, comparative studies on perioral and transcervical access and others which compare the results of the endoscopic and of the conventional access were all included. Most of them were retrospective. For evaluation of long-term results, those articles with follow-up periods over 12 months were taken. Conclusions: The open access provides better long-term results, but it has more immediate complications. It is advisable to use it in young patients and when anatomic conditions are unfavorable for the endoscopic treatment. Finally, the endoscopic treatment is an adequate choice for patients with high surgical and anesthetic risk(AU)