Epromoters function as a hub to recruit key transcription factors required for the inflammatory response.

Gene expression is controlled by the involvement of gene-proximal (promoters) and distal (enhancers) regulatory elements. Our previous results demonstrated that a subset of gene promoters, termed Epromoters, work as bona fide enhancers and regulate distal gene expression. Here, we hypothesized that Epromoters play a key role in the coordination of rapid gene induction during the inflammatory response. Using a high-throughput reporter assay we explored the function of Epromoters in response to type I interferon. We find that clusters of IFNa-induced genes are frequently associated with Epromoters and that these regulatory elements preferentially recruit the STAT1/2 and IRF transcription factors and distally regulate the activation of interferon-response genes. Consistently, we identified and validated the involvement of Epromoter-containing clusters in the regulation of LPS-stimulated macrophages. Our findings suggest that Epromoters function as a local hub recruiting the key TFs required for coordinated regulation of gene clusters during the inflammatory response.

7-[[(4-methyl-2-pyridinyl)amino](2-pyridinyl)methyl]-8-quinolinol (compound 30666) inhibits enhancer activity and reduces B-cell lymphoma growth - A question of specificity.

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is among the ten most common malignancies. Survival rates range from very poor to over 90% and highly depend on the stage and subtype. Characteristic features of NHL are recurrent translocations juxtaposing an oncogene (e.g. MYC, BCL2) to the enhancers in the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) locus. Survival and proliferation of many B-cell lymphomas depend on the expression of the translocated oncogene. Thus, targeting IGH enhancers as an anti-lymphoma treatment seems a promising strategy. Recently, a small molecule - 7-[[(4-methyl-2-pyridinyl)amino](2-pyridinyl)methyl]-8-quinolinol (compound 30666) was identified to decrease activity of the Eµ enhancer and reduce the expression of translocated oncogenes in multiple myeloma and some NHL cell lines (Dolloff, 2019). Here, we aimed to test the effect of compound 30666 in Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and shed light on its mechanism of action. We report that both IGH-translocation positive NHL cells as well as IGH-translocation negative B cells and non-B cell controls treated with compound 30666 exhibited consistent growth inhibition. A statistically significant increase in cell percentage in sub-G1 phase of cell cycle was observed, suggesting induction of apoptosis. Compound 30666 downregulated MYC levels in BL cell lines and altered IGH enhancer RNA expression. Moreover, a global decrease of H3K27ac and an increase of H3K4me1 was observed upon 30666 treatment, which suggests switching enhancers to a poised or primed state. Altogether, our findings indicate that 30666 inhibitor affects enhancer activity but might not be as specific for IGH enhancers as previously reported.

Cereblon enhancer methylation and IMiD resistance in multiple myeloma.

Cereblon is the direct binding target of the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) that are commonly used to treat multiple myeloma (MM), the second most frequent hematologic malignancy. Patients respond well to initial treatment with IMiDs, but virtually all patients develop drug resistance over time, and the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. We identified an as yet undescribed DNA hypermethylation in an active intronic CRBN enhancer. Differential hypermethylation in this region was found to be increased in healthy plasma cells, but was more pronounced in IMiD-refractory MM. Methylation significantly correlated with decreased CRBN expression levels. DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNTMi) in vitro experiments induced CRBN enhancer demethylation, and sensitizing effects on lenalidomide treatment were observed in 2 MM cell lines. Thus, we provide first evidence that aberrant CRBN DNA methylation is a novel mechanism of IMiD resistance in MM and may predict IMiD response prior to treatment.

Fasting Hormones Synergistically Induce Amino Acid Catabolism Genes to Promote Gluconeogenesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gluconeogenesis from amino acids (AAs) maintains glucose homeostasis during fasting. Although glucagon is known to regulate AA catabolism, the contribution of other hormones to it and the scope of transcriptional regulation dictating AA catabolism are unknown. We explored the role of the fasting hormones glucagon and glucocorticoids in transcriptional regulation of AA catabolism genes and AA-dependent gluconeogenesis. METHODS: We tested the RNA expression of AA catabolism genes and glucose production in primary mouse hepatocytes treated with fasting hormones (glucagon, corticosterone) and feeding hormones (insulin, fibroblast growth factor 19). We analyzed genomic data of chromatin accessibility and chromatin immunoprecipitation in mice and primary mouse hepatocytes. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation in livers of fasted mice to show binding of cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). RESULTS: Fasting induced the expression of 31 genes with various roles in AA catabolism. Of them, 15 were synergistically induced by co-treatment of glucagon and corticosterone. Synergistic gene expression relied on the activity of both CREB and GR and was abolished by treatment with either insulin or fibroblast growth factor 19. Enhancers adjacent to synergistically induced genes became more accessible and were bound by CREB and GR on fasting. Akin to the gene expression pattern, gluconeogenesis from AAs was synergistically induced by glucagon and corticosterone in a CREB- and GR-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Transcriptional regulation of AA catabolism genes during fasting is widespread and is driven by glucagon (via CREB) and corticosterone (via GR). Glucose production in hepatocytes is also synergistically augmented, showing that glucagon alone is insufficient in fully activating gluconeogenesis.

Distal Enhancer Potentiates Activin- and GnRH-Induced Transcription of FSHB.

FSH is critical for fertility. Transcription of FSHB, the gene encoding the beta subunit, is rate-limiting in FSH production and is regulated by both GnRH and activin. Activin signals through SMAD transcription factors. Although the mechanisms and importance of activin signaling in mouse Fshb transcription are well-established, activin regulation of human FSHB is less well understood. We previously reported a novel enhancer of FSHB that contains a fertility-associated single nucleotide polymorphism (rs10031006) and requires a region resembling a full (8 base-pair) SMAD binding element (SBE). Here, we investigated the role of the putative SBE within the enhancer in activin and GnRH regulation of FSHB. In mouse gonadotrope-derived LßT2 cells, the upstream enhancer potentiated activin induction of both the human and mouse FSHB proximal promoters and conferred activin responsiveness to a minimal promoter. Activin induction of the enhancer required the SBE and was blocked by the inhibitory SMAD7, confirming involvement of the classical SMAD signaling pathway. GnRH induction of FSHB was also potentiated by the enhancer and dependent on the SBE, consistent with known activin/GnRH synergy regulating FSHB transcription. In DNA pull-down, the enhancer SBE bound SMAD4, and chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated SMAD4 enrichment at the enhancer in native chromatin. Combined activin/GnRH treatment elevated levels of the active transcriptional histone marker, histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation, at the enhancer. Overall, this study indicates that the enhancer is directly targeted by activin signaling and identifies a novel, evolutionarily conserved mechanism by which activin and GnRH can regulate FSHB transcription.

FOSL1 promotes metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through super-enhancer-driven transcription program.

Previously, we discovered that FOSL1 facilitates the metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cancer stem cells in a spontaneous mouse model. However, the molecular mechanisms remained unclear. Here, we demonstrated that FOSL1 serves as the dominant activating protein 1 (AP1) family member and is significantly upregulated in HNSCC tumor tissues and correlated with metastasis of HNSCC. Mechanistically, FOSL1 exerts its function in promoting tumorigenicity and metastasis predominantly via selective association with Mediators to establish super-enhancers (SEs) at a cohort of cancer stemness and pro-metastatic genes, such as SNAI2 and FOSL1 itself. Depletion of FOSL1 led to disruption of SEs and expression inhibition of these key oncogenes, which resulted in the suppression of tumor initiation and metastasis. We also revealed that the abundance of FOSL1 is positively associated with the abundance of SNAI2 in HNSCC and the high expression levels of FOSL1 and SNAI2 are associated with short overall disease-free survival. Finally, the administration of the FOSL1 inhibitor SR11302 significantly suppressed tumor growth and lymph node metastasis of HNSCC in a patient-derived xenograft model. These findings indicate that FOSL1 is a master regulator that promotes the metastasis of HNSCC through a SE-driven transcription program that may represent an attractive target for therapeutic interventions.

Suppression of liquid-liquid phase separation by 1,6-hexanediol partially compromises the 3D genome organization in living cells.

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) contributes to the spatial and functional segregation of molecular processes within the cell nucleus. However, the role played by LLPS in chromatin folding in living cells remains unclear. Here, using stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) and Hi-C techniques, we studied the effects of 1,6-hexanediol (1,6-HD)-mediated LLPS disruption/modulation on higher-order chromatin organization in living cells. We found that 1,6-HD treatment caused the enlargement of nucleosome clutches and their more uniform distribution in the nuclear space. At a megabase-scale, chromatin underwent moderate but irreversible perturbations that resulted in the partial mixing of A and B compartments. The removal of 1,6-HD from the culture medium did not allow chromatin to acquire initial configurations, and resulted in more compact repressed chromatin than in untreated cells. 1,6-HD treatment also weakened enhancer-promoter interactions and TAD insulation but did not considerably affect CTCF-dependent loops. Our results suggest that 1,6-HD-sensitive LLPS plays a limited role in chromatin spatial organization by constraining its folding patterns and facilitating compartmentalization at different levels.

Enhancer Reprogramming within Pre-existing Topologically Associated Domains Promotes TGF-ß-Induced EMT and Cancer Metastasis.

Transcription growth factor ß (TGF-ß) signaling-triggered epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process is associated with tumor stemness, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance. However, the epigenomic basis for TGF-ß-induced EMT remains largely unknown. Here we reveal that HDAC1-mediated global histone deacetylation and the gain of specific histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac)-marked enhancers are essential for the TGF-ß-induced EMT process. Enhancers gained upon TGF-ß treatment are linked to gene activation of EMT markers and cancer metastasis. Notably, dynamic enhancer gain or loss mainly occurs within pre-existing topologically associated domains (TADs) in epithelial cells, with minimal three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture reorganization. Through motif enrichment analysis of enhancers that are lost or gained upon TGF-ß stimulation, we identify FOXA2 as a key factor to activate epithelial-specific enhancer activity, and we also find that TEAD4 forms a complex with SMAD2/3 to mediate TGF-ß signaling-triggered mesenchymal enhancer reprogramming. Together, our results implicate that key transcription-factor (TF)-mediated enhancer reprogramming modulates the developmental transition in TGF-ß signaling-associated cancer metastasis.

Multiple mechanisms regulate H3 acetylation of enhancers in response to thyroid hormone.

Hormone-dependent activation of enhancers includes histone hyperacetylation and mediator recruitment. Histone hyperacetylation is mostly explained by a bimodal switch model, where histone deacetylases (HDACs) disassociate from chromatin, and histone acetyl transferases (HATs) are recruited. This model builds on decades of research on steroid receptor regulation of transcription. Yet, the general concept of the bimodal switch model has not been rigorously tested genome wide. We have used a genomics approach to study enhancer hyperacetylation by the thyroid hormone receptor (TR), described to operate as a bimodal switch. H3 acetylation, HAT and HDAC ChIP-seq analyses of livers from hypo- and hyperthyroid wildtype, TR deficient and NCOR1 disrupted mice reveal three types of thyroid hormone (T3)-regulated enhancers. One subset of enhancers is bound by HDAC3-NCOR1 in the absence of hormone and constitutively occupy TR and HATs irrespective of T3 levels, suggesting a poised enhancer state in absence of hormone. In presence of T3, HDAC3-NCOR1 dissociates from these enhancers leading to histone hyperacetylation, suggesting a histone acetylation rheostat function of HDACs at poised enhancers. Another subset of enhancers, not occupied by HDACs, is hyperacetylated in a T3-dependent manner, where TR is recruited to chromatin together with HATs. Lastly, a subset of enhancers, is not occupied directly by TR yet requires TR for histone hyperacetylation. This indirect enhancer activation involves co-association with TR bound enhancers within super-enhancers or topological associated domains. Collectively, this demonstrates various mechanisms controlling hormone-dependent transcription and adds significant details to the otherwise simple bimodal switch model.

Super-enhancers: A new frontier for glioma treatment.

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor in the human brain. Although there are a variety of treatments, such as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, glioma is still an incurable disease. Super-enhancers (SEs) are implicated in the control of tumor cell identity, and they promote oncogenic transcription, which supports tumor cells. Inhibition of the SE complex, which is required for the assembly and maintenance of SEs, may repress oncogenic transcription and impede tumor growth. In this review, we discuss the unique characteristics of SEs compared to typical enhancers, and we summarize the recent advances in the understanding of their properties and biological role in gene regulation. Additionally, we highlight that SE-driven lncRNAs, miRNAs and genes are involved in the malignant phenotype of glioma. Most importantly, the application of SE inhibitors in different cancer subtypes has introduced new directions in glioma treatment.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-induced activation of the human IGH hs1.2 enhancer: Mutational analysis of putative regulatory binding motifs.

The human hs1.2 enhancer within the Ig heavy chain gene (IGH) is polymorphic and associated with a number of autoimmune diseases. The polymorphic region is characterized by tandem repeats of an ∼53-bp invariant sequence containing possible binding sites for several transcription factors. Our previous studies suggest the human hs1.2 enhancer is sensitive to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), an environmental toxicant and high affinity ligand of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). TCDD induced hs1.2 enhancer activity in an AhR-dependent manner and the number of invariant sequences influenced the magnitude of activity. To better understand the regulation of human hs1.2 enhancer activity, the objective of the current study was to utilize mutational analysis and luciferase reporter constructs to evaluate the contribution of putative transcription factor binding sites to overall hs1.2 enhancer activity and modulation by TCDD. Basal and LPS-induced activity of the hs1.2 enhancer appeared to be most affected by mutation of sites outside of the invariant sequence or deletion of the entire invariant sequence; whereas sites influencing the effect of TCDD were dependent on the cellular activation state (i.e. unstimulated vs. LPS stimulation) and relatively independent of the putative AhR binding site within the invariant sequence. These results suggest that AhR activation affects human hs1.2 activity through an as yet undetermined non-canonical pathway. A better understanding regarding the role of the hs1.2 enhancer in human Ig expression and how AhR ligands modulate its activity may lead to insights into overall Ig regulation and mechanisms of dysfunction.

Sufficiency analysis of estrogen responsive enhancers using synthetic activators.

Multiple regulatory regions bound by the same transcription factor have been shown to simultaneously control a single gene's expression. However, it remains unclear how these regulatory regions combine to regulate transcription. Here, we test the sufficiency of promoter-distal estrogen receptor α-binding sites (ERBSs) for activating gene expression by recruiting synthetic activators in the absence of estrogens. Targeting either dCas9-VP16(10x) or dCas9-p300(core) to ERBS induces H3K27ac and activates nearby expression in a manner similar to an estrogen induction, with dCas9-VP16(10x) acting as a stronger activator. The sufficiency of individual ERBSs is highly correlated with their necessity, indicating an inherent activation potential that is associated with the binding of RNA polymerase II and several transcription factors. By targeting ERBS combinations, we found that ERBSs work independently to control gene expression when bound by synthetic activators. The sufficiency results contrast necessity assays that show synergy between these ERBSs, suggesting that synergy occurs between ERBSs in terms of activator recruitment, whereas directly recruiting activators leads to independent effects on gene expression.

Chemical genomics reveals histone deacetylases are required for core regulatory transcription.

Identity determining transcription factors (TFs), or core regulatory (CR) TFs, are governed by cell-type specific super enhancers (SEs). Drugs to selectively inhibit CR circuitry are of high interest for cancer treatment. In alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, PAX3-FOXO1 activates SEs to induce the expression of other CR TFs, providing a model system for studying cancer cell addiction to CR transcription. Using chemical genetics, the systematic screening of chemical matter for a biological outcome, here we report on a screen for epigenetic chemical probes able to distinguish between SE-driven transcription and constitutive transcription. We find that chemical probes along the acetylation-axis, and not the methylation-axis, selectively disrupt CR transcription. Additionally, we find that histone deacetylases (HDACs) are essential for CR TF transcription. We further dissect the contribution of HDAC isoforms using selective inhibitors, including the newly developed selective HDAC3 inhibitor LW3. We show HDAC1/2/3 are the co-essential isoforms that when co-inhibited halt CR transcription, making CR TF sites hyper-accessible and disrupting chromatin looping.

Pervasive H3K27 Acetylation Leads to ERV Expression and a Therapeutic Vulnerability in H3K27M Gliomas.

High-grade gliomas defined by histone 3 K27M driver mutations exhibit global loss of H3K27 trimethylation and reciprocal gain of H3K27 acetylation, respectively shaping repressive and active chromatin landscapes. We generated tumor-derived isogenic models bearing this mutation and show that it leads to pervasive H3K27ac deposition across the genome. In turn, active enhancers and promoters are not created de novo and instead reflect the epigenomic landscape of the cell of origin. H3K27ac is enriched at repeat elements, resulting in their increased expression, which in turn can be further amplified by DNA demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibitors providing an exquisite therapeutic vulnerability. These agents may therefore modulate anti-tumor immune responses as a therapeutic modality for this untreatable disease.

Aberrant activation of CYR61 enhancers in colorectal cancer development.

BACKGROUND: High expression of secreted matricellular protein cysteine-rich 61 (CYR61) correlates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Aberrant enhancer activation has been shown to correlate with expression of key genes involved in cancer progression. However, such mechanisms in CYR61 transcription regulation remain unexplored. METHODS: Expression of CYR61 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blotting (WB) in CRC patients paraffin specimens and colon cell lines. ChIP-seq data of enhancer-characteristic histone modifications, in CRC tissues from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, were reanalyzed to search for putative enhancers of CYR61. Dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to detected enhancer activity. Physical interactions between putative enhancers and CYR61 promoter were detected by chromosome conformation capture (3C) assay. Histone modification and transcription factors (TFs) enrichment were detected by ChIP-qPCR. Additionally, biological function of enhancers was investigated by transwell migration assays. RESULTS: CRC tissues and cell lines expressed higher level of CYR61 than normal colon mucosa. Three putative enhancers located downstream of CYR61 were found in CRC tissues by ChIP-seq data reanalysis. Consistent with the ChIP-seq analysis results in the GEO database, the normal colon mucosal epithelial cell line NCM460 possessed no active CYR61 enhancers, whereas colon cancer cells exhibited different patterns of active CYR61 enhancers. HCT116 cells had an active Enhancer3, whereas RKO cells had both Enhancer1 and Enhancer3 active. Pioneer factor FOXA1 promoted CYR61 expression by recruiting CBP histone acetyltransferase binding and increasing promoter-enhancer looping frequencies and enhancer activity. CBP knockdown attenuated H3K27ac enrichment, promoter-enhancer looping frequencies, and enhancer activity. Small molecule compound 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) treatment, which stimulated CYR61 expression, and verteporfin (VP) treatment, which inhibited CYR61 expression, confirmed that the enhancers regulated CYR61 expression. Knockdown and ectopic expression of CYR61 rescued cell migration changes induced by over-expressing and knockdown of FOXA1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CYR61 enhancer activation, mediated by FOXA1 and CBP, occurs during CRC progression to up-regulate CYR61 expression and promote cell migration in CRC, suggesting inhibition of recruitment of FOXA1 and/or CBP to CYR61 enhancers may have therapeutic implications.

TGF-ß1 alters DNA methylation levels in promoter and enhancer regions of the WT1 gene in human podocytes.

AIM: Wilms' tumour 1 (WT1) is essential for normal podocyte function. Previous reports have demonstrated that the WT1 promoter is often methylated in cancers, leading to transcriptional silencing. Transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) is reported to down-regulate WT1 expression in podocytes. Based on the hypothesis that epigenetic modification plays a role in this process, we examined whether TGF-ß1 affects the methylation status of WT1 regulatory regions. METHODS: Conditional immortalized human podocytes were treated with TGF-ß1. A human renal proximal tubular epithelial cell line (HK2), which does not express WT1, was used as a control. The degree of DNA methylation of the WT1 promoter, 5' enhancer, intron 3 enhancer and 3' enhancer was determined using quantitative methylation-specific PCR, bisulfite sequencing and pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Both WT1 mRNA and protein expression were reduced by long-term treatment with TGF-ß1. The WT1 promoter was hypomethylated, and the 5' enhancer and intron 3 enhancer were substantially methylated in untreated podocytes. In contrast, in HK2 cells, the WT1 promoter was strongly methylated, and the 5' enhancer and intron 3 enhancer were less methylated than in untreated podocytes. TGF-ß1 tended to increase WT1 promoter methylation, tended to decrease 5' enhancer methylation and significantly decreased intron 3 enhancer methylation in podocytes. Methylation levels of the 3' enhancer did not differ among untreated cells, TGF-ß1-treated podocytes or HK2 cells. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the methylation pattern of the WT1 promoter and enhancers in human podocytes are distinctive from those in HK2. Furthermore, TGF-ß1 alters the methylation levels of the WT1 promoter and enhancers in human podocytes. This modification may be relevant to the attenuation of WT1 by TGF-ß1, which could contribute to podocyte injury.

Discovery platform for inhibitors of IgH gene enhancer activity.

Immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) translocations are common and early oncogenic events in B cell and plasma cell malignancies including B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). IgH translocations bring oncogenes into close proximity with potent enhancer elements within the IgH locus, leading to oncogene up-regulation. As IgH enhancer activity is tightly controlled by B cell lineage-specific signaling and transcriptional networks, we hypothesized that IgH enhancers are potentially druggable targets/elements. To test this, we developed a molecular imaging-based high-throughput screening platform for discovering inhibitors of IgH enhancer-driven transcriptional activity. As proof of concept, we identified a low micromolar potency molecule (compound 30666) that inhibited immunoglobulin production by MM cells and blocked expression of an array of IgH translocation-induced oncogenes (CCND1, FGFR3/MMSET, and MYC) in MM and NHL cell lines. Prolonged exposure to 30666 significantly reduced the viability of IgH translocation-positive NHL and MM cells, but was less effective against cells lacking IgH translocations. Compound 30666 exhibited suitable pharmacological properties, including metabolic stability in liver microsomes and oral bioavailability in mice, and demonstrated preclinical anti-MM activity in a plasmacytoma mouse model. Our work suggests that IgH enhancers are attractive and potentially druggable targets for IgH translocation driven malignancies.

Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Regulator 1, CCAR1, Regulates Enhancer-Dependent Nuclear Receptor CAR Transactivation.

The constitutive active/androstane receptor (CAR) controls genes involved in xenochemical metabolism. Although numerous cofactors have been reported to be involved in CAR-mediated transactivation, unknown and poorly defined proteins recruited by CAR have yet to be characterized. In this study, a novel CAR-interacting protein, cell cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 (CCAR1), was identified by coimmunoprecipitation analysis using human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells expressing FLAG epitope-tagged CAR. We demonstrated that CCAR1 can act as an enhancer-dependent coactivator of CAR. First, we showed that overexpression of CCAR1 enhanced CAR-induced reporter gene activity with triplicate consensus direct repeat 4 motif (DR4-Luc), xenobiotic-responsive enhancer module (XREM)-enhancer of CYP3A4 (XREM-Luc), and phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases 1A1 (UGT1A1) (gtPBREM)-enhancer of UGT1A1 (gtPBREM-Luc)-driven reporter plasmids but not PBREM-enhancer of CYP2B6 (PBREM-Luc)-driven reporter activity. Furthermore, we showed that knockdown of CCAR1 suppressed CAR-induced UGT1A1 mRNA expression but did not affect CAR-induced CYP2B6 mRNA expression in HepTR/CAR and HepaRG cells. Moreover, CCAR1 could be recruited to the gtPBREM of the UGT1A1 enhancer by CAR but not to the PBREM of the CYP2B6 enhancer. Moreover, we showed that CCAR1 can act as a secondary coactivator by cooperating with the p160 family of steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs). These findings demonstrated CCAR1 to be a novel transcriptional cofactor for CAR and provided insight regarding the mechanism of CAR-mediated gene-selective transactivation.

Tobacco Heating System 2.2 has a limited impact on DNA methylation of candidate enhancers in mouse lung compared with cigarette smoke.

Cigarette smoke (CS) exposure has been shown to correlate with changes in DNA methylation levels, however, the impact of CS on DNA methylation at genome-wide scale is missing. Here, we used whole-genome bisulfite sequencing to assess the effects of CS extract and aerosol from the Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2, a candidate modified risk tobacco product, on DNA methylation in lung and liver tissues from apolipoprotein E-deficient mice during an eight-month period of exposure. We found that in lung tissue, CS mainly induced hypermethylation of candidate enhancers at late time points, while promoters were less affected. This effect was strongly reduced upon cessation or switching to THS 2.2. By contrast, chronic exposure to THS 2.2 had a limited effect on DNA methylation at both promoters and enhancers. We also identified members of the Ets and Fox families of transcription factors as potential players in the epigenetic response to CS exposure in lung tissue. In contrast to the lung, DNA methylation in the liver was largely insensitive to all investigated exposures. In summary, our investigations indicate that CS-related DNA methylation alterations are tissue-specific, occur mainly at enhancers and are strongly reduced upon smoking cessation or switching to THS2.2.