Archaeological occurrences and historical review of the human amoeba, Entamoeba histolytica, over the past 6000years.

Understanding parasite history and the evolution of host/parasite relationships is one of the most important aspects of paleoparasitology. Within the framework of this research topic, this paper focuses on the human pathogenic amoeba, Entamoeba histolytica. The compilation of all the available archaeological data concerning this parasite leads to a first glimpse of the history of this parasite of current medical importance. Paleoparasitological investigation into this parasite uses immunological techniques and shows that the modern strain of E. histolytica has been present in Western Europe since at least the Neolithic period (3700yearsBCE), and could have originated in the Old World. The appearance of the modern amoeba strain in the pre-Columbian Americas and the Middle East around the 12th century CE gives rise to hypotheses as to how human migrations (Atlantic or Pacific routes) contributed to the diffusion of this pathogen, resulting in its current distribution. This compilation proves that parasites are valuable proxies for studying past human and animal migrations, and should be given more consideration in the future.

New evidence of Entamoeba histolytica infections in pre-Columbian and colonial cemeteries in the Caribbean.

ELISA was used to test the presence of the human pathogenic amoeba Entamoeba histolytica in archaeological samples from 2 cemeteries in Guadeloupe, in the Caribbean. Results show that 15.9% of the population was infected during the colonial period, a value comparable to the current rates observed in humans in adjacent countries. This study also confirms the presence of the current strain of E. histolytica in pre-Columbian South America before the European colonization in the 15th century and raises the possibility of an earlier transfer from Europe to the Americas.

[Amebiasis: implications of the recognition of Entamoeba dispar and the identification of Entamoeba moshkovskii in humans]. / Amibiasis: implicaciones del reconocimiento de Entamoeba dispar e identificación de Entamoeba moshkovskii en humanos.

The history of Entamoeba histolytica is very confuse and shows several wrong concepts about the parasite and its relationship with the host. The poor correlation between the prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic amebiasis originated the proposal of three explicative hypothesis, among them was the concept of Brumpt that E. histolytica comprised two morphologically identical species, E. dysenteriae and E. dispar. The application of modern molecular techniques irrefutably proved that E. histolytica was really a complex of two species, confirming the concept of Brumpt almost 7 decades later. Recent studies have identified in humans E. moshkovskii, morphologically indistinguishable from E. histolytica and E. dispar, a great genetic diversity within each of these species, and heterogeneity in virulence among E. histolytica strains. The redescription of E. dispar, and the recovery of E. moshkovskii from humans have had a major impact in our understanding of E. histolytica and amebiasis with important clinical and epidemiologic implications. This has led to the need of a reevaluation of the infection in terms of prevalence and morbidity in the global population and to study the geographic distribution, prevalence, and transmission pattern of E. histolytica strains in order to detect those with epidemiologic relevance and predict the risk of amebic disease in a population.

Parasitism in Kansas in the 1800s: a glimpse to the past through the analysis of grave sediments from Meadowlark cemetery

During the excavations of the XIX century Meadowlark cemetery (Manhattan, Kansas, US), samples of sediments were taken from around five skeletons, and analyzed to detect intestinal parasites. No helminth eggs were found, but immunological ELISA tests for Entamoeba histolytica were positive in three samples. The immunological techniques have been successfully used in paleoparasitology to detect protozoan infections. Amoebiasis could have been a severe disease in the past, especially where poor sanitary conditions prevailed, and there is evidence that this cemetery may have been used in a situation where poor sanitary conditions may have prevailed. The presence of this protozoan in US during the late XIX century gives information on the health of the population and provides additional data on the parasite's evolution since its appearance in the New World.

Parasitism in Kansas in the 1800s: a glimpse to the past through the analysis of grave sediments from Meadowlark cemetery.

During the excavations of the XIX century Meadowlark cemetery (Manhattan, Kansas, US), samples of sediments were taken from around five skeletons, and analyzed to detect intestinal parasites. No helminth eggs were found, but immunological ELISA tests for Entamoeba histolytica were positive in three samples. The immunological techniques have been successfully used in paleoparasitology to detect protozoan infections. Amoebiasis could have been a severe disease in the past, especially where poor sanitary conditions prevailed, and there is evidence that this cemetery may have been used in a situation where poor sanitary conditions may have prevailed. The presence of this protozoan in US during the late XIX century gives information on the health of the population and provides additional data on the parasite's evolution since its appearance in the New World.

Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene meeting at Manson House, London, 19 February 1998. Amoebic disease. Entamoeba dispar, an organism reborn.

Entamoeba dispar was described by Emile Brumpt in 1925, and was promptly dismissed as a synonym of E. histolytica by almost all his contemporaries. In the 1970s, however, evidence began to accumulate indicating that Brumpt may have been correct and E. dispar is now accepted as a distinct species. This review introduces the organism's history and briefly summarizes what we currently know about its biology. The acceptance of E. dispar has profound implications for our understanding of the epidemiology of amoebiasis and, ultimately, may give us an insight into what makes E. histolytica a pathogen.

Entamoeba histolytica and Homo sapiens.

Blind acceptance of the dicta of the great has led to much confusion as to the relationship between amoeba and man. A review of the mistakes of the past may lead to a better appreciation of the present, and higher hopes for the future. An hypothesis is presented.