Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B*15:02 screening before treatment of epilepsy in Indonesia.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse skin reactions due to drugs such as Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) occur in 3% of people receiving anti epileptic drugs (AED). Although SJS/TEN has a low incidence, the mortality and morbidity rates are high. Indonesia has not adopted HLA-B*1502 screening prior to administration of carbamazepine (CBZ), although previous studies found a relationship between HLA-B*1502 and SJS/TEN. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model was developed to evaluate three strategies for treating newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: CBZ direct therapy, levetiracetam (LEV) direct therapy, and therapy based on HLA-B*15:02 test results. From a societal perspective, base case and sensitivity analyses were carried out over a lifetime. RESULTS: Direct administration of CBZ appears to have a slightly lower average cost than the HLA-B*15:02 allele screening strategy. The increase in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in HLA-B*15:02 screening before treatment related to the cost difference reached 0.519 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of around USD 984 per unit of QALY acquisition. Direct treatment of LEV increased treatment costs by almost USD 2000 on average compared to the standard CBZ strategy. The increase in QALY is 0.834 in direct levetiracetam treatment, with an ICER of around USD 2230 for each QALY processing. CONCLUSION: Calculation of the cost-effectiveness of lifetime epilepsy therapy in this study found that the initial screening strategy with the HLA-B*15:02 test was the most cost-effective.

High-Value Epilepsy Care in the United States: Predictors of Increased Costs and Complications from the National Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2019.

BACKGROUND: For patients with medically refractory epilepsy, newer minimally invasive techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have been developed in recent years. This study aims to characterize trends in the utilization of surgical resection versus LITT to treat medically refractory epilepsy, characterize complications, and understand the cost of this innovative technique to the public. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for all patients admitted with a diagnosis of medically refractory epilepsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, complications, and costs were tabulated for all patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection within these cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 6019 patients were included, 223 underwent LITT procedures, while 5796 underwent resection. Significant predictors of increased patient charges for both cohorts included diabetes (odds ratio: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.19), infection (odds ratio: 5.12, CI 2.73-9.58), and hemorrhage (odds ratio: 2.95, CI 2.04-4.12). Procedures performed at nonteaching hospitals had 1.54 greater odds (CI 1.02-2.33) of resulting in a complication compared to teaching hospitals. Insurance status did significantly differ (P = 0.001) between those receiving LITT (23.3% Medicare; 25.6% Medicaid; 44.4% private insurance; 6.7 Other) and those undergoing resection (35.3% Medicare; 22.5% Medicaid; 34.7% private Insurance; 7.5% other). When adjusting for patient demographics, LITT patients had shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 8.9 days, P < 0.001), lower complication rate (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.385), and lower mean hospital ($139,412.79 vs. $233,120.99, P < 0.001) and patient ($55,394.34 vs. $37,756.66, P < 0.001) costs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights LITT's advantages through its association with lower costs and shorter length of stay. The present study also highlights the associated predictors of LITT versus resection, such as that most LITT cases happen at academic centers for patients with private insurance. As the adoption of LITT continues, more data will become available to further understand these issues.

Virtual epilepsy clinics - A Canadian Comprehensive Epilepsy Center experience pre-COVID and during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the role of prior experience with virtual care (through e-visits) in maintaining continuity in ambulatory epilepsy care during an unprecedented pandemic situation, comparing in person versus e-visit clinic uptake. METHODS: This is an observational study on virtual epilepsy care (through e-visits) over two years, during a pre-COVID period (14 months) continuing into the COVID-19 pandemic period (10 months). For a small initial section of patients seen during the study period a physician survey and a patient satisfaction survey were completed (n = 53). Outcomes of eVisits were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Median numbers of epilepsy clinic visits conducted during the COVID-19 period (27.5 new and 113 follow up) remained similar to the median uptake during the pre-COVID period (28 new and 116 follow up). Prior experience with e-visits for epilepsy yielded smooth transition into the pandemic period, with several other advantages. The majority of eVisits were successful despite technical difficulties and major components of history and management were still easily implemented. Results from patient surveys supported that a significant amount of time and money were saved, which was in keeping with our health-economic analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study is one of the first few reports of fully integrated virtual care in a comprehensive epilepsy clinic starting much before start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of our study support the feasibility of using virtual care to deliver specialized outpatient care in a comprehensive epilepsy center.

Assessing seizure burden in pediatric epilepsy using an electronic medical record-based tool through a common data element approach.

OBJECTIVE: Improvement in epilepsy care requires standardized methods to assess disease severity. We report the results of implementing common data elements (CDEs) to document epilepsy history data in the electronic medical record (EMR) after 12 months of clinical use in outpatient encounters. METHODS: Data regarding seizure frequency were collected during routine clinical encounters using a CDE-based form within our EMR. We extracted CDE data from the EMR and developed measurements for seizure severity and seizure improvement scores. Seizure burden and improvement was evaluated by patient demographic and encounter variables for in-person and telemedicine encounters. RESULTS: We assessed a total of 1696 encounters in 1038 individuals with childhood epilepsies between September 6, 2019 and September 11, 2020 contributed by 32 distinct providers. Childhood absence epilepsy (n = 121), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 86), and Dravet syndrome (n = 42) were the most common epilepsy syndromes. Overall, 43% (737/1696) of individuals had at least monthly seizures, 17% (296/1696) had a least daily seizures, and 18% (311/1696) were seizure-free for >12 months. Quantification of absolute seizure burden and changes in seizure burden over time differed between epilepsy syndromes, including high and persistent seizure burden in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Individuals seen via telemedicine or in-person encounters had comparable seizure frequencies. Individuals identifying as Hispanic/Latino, particularly from postal codes with lower median household incomes, were more likely to have ongoing seizures that worsened over time. SIGNIFICANCE: Standardized documentation of clinical data in childhood epilepsies through CDE can be implemented in routine clinical care at scale and enables assessment of disease burden, including characterization of seizure burden over time. Our data provide insights into heterogeneous patterns of seizure control in common pediatric epilepsy syndromes and will inform future initiatives focusing on patient-centered outcomes in childhood epilepsies, including the impact of telemedicine and health care disparities.

Valproic acid and socioeconomic associations in Swedish women with epilepsy 2010-2015.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the correlation between socioeconomic status and the prescription of Valproic acid (VPA) in women of fertile age in Sweden. METHODS: This is a registered-based cohort study including all women living in Sweden aged 18-45 years in the years 2010-2015, with a diagnosis of epilepsy and no intellectual disability (n = 9143). Data were collected from the National Patient Register, the Drug Prescription Register, and the Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labor market studies (LISA). RESULTS: Women with only 9 years of school were more often prescribed VPA than women with a University degree (12.9% compared to 10.7% in 2015 [p = 0.015]). Similar differences were seen between the lowest and highest income group (16.6% compared to 12.7% in 2015 [p < 0.001]). The odds of having a VPA prescription in 2015 was 1.59 (p < 0.001) in women with 9 years of school compared to women with a University degree, and 1.60 (p < 0.001) in the lowest income group relative to the highest income group after adjusting for age. From 2010 to 2015, the proportion with VPA prescription in the whole cohort diminished with an absolute reduction of -2.2% (p < 0.001). The decrease was similar among the different education and income groups (p = 0.919 and p = 0.280). SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that the increased knowledge on VPA teratogenicity was implemented across socioeconomic strata in the Swedish healthcare system. Women with lower income or education level remained more frequent VPA users. Whether this difference reflects epilepsy type or severity, or socioeconomic disparities, merit further study.

Determination of healthcare resource and cost implications of using alternative sodium valproate formulations in the treatment of epilepsy in children in England: A retrospective database review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the adherence, healthcare resource and cost implications of using Episenta® minitablets or Epilim® monolithic tablet in the treatment of epilepsy in children in England. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of healthcare administrative databases. SETTING: The study analysed data collected from Primary Care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)) and Secondary Care (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (stratified by age 0-12; 0-17 and 18+ years) with a diagnosis of epilepsy in receipt of a new prescription for Episenta® minitablets or Epilim® monolithic tablet from January 2012 to October 2017. Limited to those with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determining the impact of sodium valproate formulation on measures of treatment adherence and healthcare resource usage. RESULTS: There were 793 patients in the dataset: 84 on Episenta® minitablets and 709 on Epilim® tablets. Measures of medication adherence were not significantly different between the minitablet formulation and the monolithic matrix tablet. However there was a greater annualised incidence rate of epilepsy related primary healthcare contacts in a paediatric population from the tablet formulation compared to those treated with minitablets (95% CI [-1.561,0.0152]) for those aged 0-12 and (95% CI [-1.3234,-0.0058]) for those aged 0-17. This is found despite a lower dose being used in the minitablet cohort (595 mg vs 945 mg for the tablet) for those aged 0-17 which indicates effective therapy at a lower dose using the minitablet compared to the monolithic tablet formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Minitablet formulations of sodium valproate (presented as granules in capsules or sachets) can provide better therapeutic outcomes and reduced associated healthcare resource costs compared to monolithic tablets in children and young people with epilepsy. The interpretation of this data is limited by the large difference in sample size between the two groups which needs additional investigation to generate matched data for future comparisons. Further work is required to understand why the Episenta® minitablets formulation generated better outcomes in paediatric populations.

Treatment gaps and challenges in epilepsy care in the Philippines.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a neurologic disease that carries a high disease burden and likely, a huge treatment gap especially in low-to-middle income countries (LMIC) such as the Philippines. This review aimed to examine the treatment gaps and challenges that burden Philippine epilepsy care. MATERIALS & METHODS: Pertinent data on epidemiology, research, health financing and health systems, pharmacologic and surgical treatment options, cost of care, and workforce were obtained through a literature search and review of relevant Philippine government websites. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of epilepsy in the Philippines is 0.9%. Epilepsy research in the Philippines is low in quantity compared with the rest of Southeast Asia (SEA). Inequities in quality and quantity of healthcare services delivered to local government units (LGUs) have arisen because of devolution. Programs for epilepsy care by both government and nongovernment institutions have been implemented. Healthcare expenditure in the Philippines is still largely out-of-pocket, with only partial coverage from the public sector. There is limited access to antiseizure medications (ASMs), mainly due to cost. Epilepsy surgery is an underutilized treatment option. There are only 20 epileptologists in the Philippines, with one epileptologist for every 45,000 patients with epilepsy. In addition, epilepsy care service delivery has been further impeded by the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. CONCLUSION: There is a large treatment gap in epilepsy care in the Philippines in terms of high epilepsy disease burden, socioeconomic limitations and inadequate public support, sparse clinico-epidemiologic research on epilepsy, inaccessibility of health care services and essential pharmacotherapy, underutilization of surgical options, and lack of specialists capable of rendering epilepsy care. Acknowledgment of the existence of these treatment gaps and addressing such are expected to improve the overall survival and quality of life of patients with epilepsy in the Philippines.

Economic burden of epilepsy in children: A population-based matched cohort study in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The economic burden of childhood epilepsy to the health care system remains poorly understood. This study aimed to determine phase-specific and cumulative long-term health care costs in children with epilepsy (CWE) from the health care payer perspective. METHODS: This cohort study utilized linked health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Incident childhood epilepsy cases were identified from January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2017. CWE were matched to children without epilepsy (CWOE) on age, sex, rurality, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, and assigned prediagnosis, initial, ongoing, and final care phase based on clinical trajectory. Phase-specific, 1-year and 5-year cumulative health care costs, attributable costs of epilepsy, and distribution of costs across different ages were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 24 411 CWE were matched to CWOE. The costs were higher for prediagnosis and initial care than ongoing care in CWE. Hospitalization was the main cost component. The costs of prediagnosis, initial, and ongoing care were higher in CWE than CWOE, with the attributable costs at $490 (95% confidence interval [CI] = $352-$616), $1322 (95% CI = $1247-$1402), and $305 (95% CI = $276-$333) per 30 patient-days, respectively. Final care costs were lower in CWE than CWOE, with attributable costs at -$2515 (95% CI = -$6288 to $961) per 30 patient-days. One-year and 5-year cumulative costs were higher in CWE ($14 776 [95% CI = $13 994-$15 546] and $39 261 [95% CI = $37 132-$41 293], respectively) than CWOE ($6152 [95% CI = $5587-$6768] and $15 598 [95% CI = $14 291-$17 006], respectively). The total health care costs were highest in the first year of life in CWE for prediagnosis, initial, and ongoing care. SIGNIFICANCE: Health care costs varied along the continuum of epilepsy care, and were mainly driven by hospitalization costs. The findings identified avenues for remediation, such as enhancing care around the time of epilepsy diagnosis and better care coordination for epilepsy and comorbidities, to reduce hospitalization costs and the economic burden of epilepsy care.

Indication-based analysis of patient outcomes following deep brain stimulation surgery.

BACKGROUND: While considered a safe operation, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been associated with various morbidities. We assessed differences in postsurgical complication rates in patients undergoing the most common types of neurostimulation surgery. METHODS: The National Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing neurostimulation placement with the diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD), epilepsy, dystonia, or essential tremor (ET). Demographics and complications, including infection, pneumonia, and neurostimulator revision, were queried for each cohort and compiled. Readmissions were assessed in 30-, 90-, and 180-day intervals. We implemented nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to control for demographic and sample size differences between groups. RESULTS: We identified 3230 patients with Parkinson disease, 1289 with essential tremor, 965 with epilepsy, and 221 with dystonia. Following propensity score matching, 221 patients remained in each cohort. Readmission rates 30-days after hospital discharge for PD patients (15.5 %) were significantly greater than those for ET (7.8 %) and seizure patients (4.4 %). Pneumonia was reported for PD (1.6 %), seizure (3.3 %) and dystonia (1.7 %) patients but not individuals ET. No PD patients were readmitted at 30-days due to dysphagia while individuals treated for ET (6.5 %), seizure (1.6 %) and dystonia (5.2 %) were. DBS-revision surgery was performed for 11.48 % of PD, 6.52 % of ET, 1.64 % of seizure and 6.90 % of dystonia patients within 30-days of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: 30-day readmission rates vary significantly between indications, with patients receiving DBS for PD having the highest rates. Further longitudinal studies are required to describe drivers of variation in postoperative outcomes following DBS surgery for different indications.

Community health workers to improve adherence to anti-seizure medication in rural South Africa: Is it cost-effective?

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a common, chronic neurological disorder that disproportionately affects individuals living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the treatment gap remains high and adherence to medication remains low. Community health workers (CHWs) have been shown to be effective at improving adherence to chronic medications, yet no study assessing the costs of CHWs in epilepsy management has been reported. METHODS: Using a Markov model with age- and sex-varying transition probabilities, we determined whether deploying CHWs to improve epilepsy treatment adherence in rural South Africa would be cost-effective. Data were derived using published studies from rural South Africa. Official statistics and international disability weights provided cost and health state values, respectively, and health gains were measured using quality adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The intervention was estimated at International Dollars ($) 123 250 per annum per sub-district community and cost $1494 and $1857 per QALY gained for males and females, respectively. Assuming a costlier intervention and lower effectiveness, cost per QALY was still less than South Africa's Gross Domestic Product per capita of $13 215, the cost-effectiveness threshold applied. SIGNIFICANCE: CHWs would be cost-effective and the intervention dominated even when costs and effects of the intervention were unfavorably varied. Health system re-engineering currently underway in South Africa identifies CHWs as vital links in primary health care, thereby ensuring sustainability of the intervention. Further research on understanding local health state utility values and cost-effectiveness thresholds could further inform the current model, and undertaking the proposed intervention would provide better estimates of its efficacy on reducing the epilepsy treatment gap in rural South Africa.

Cost-utility model of brivaracetam in the adjunctive treatment of patients with epilepsy in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the cost utility of Brivaracetam compared with the third-generation anti-epileptic drugs used as standard care. METHODS: A cost utility analysis of Brivaracetam was carried out with other third-generation comparators. The treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort over a period of 2 years was simulated using the Markov model. Data for effectiveness and the QALYs of each health status for epilepsy, as well as for the disutilities of adverse events of treatments, were analyzed through a studies review. The cost of the anti-epileptics and the use of medical resources linked to the different health statuses were taken into consideration. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Brivaracetam was shown to be the dominant alternative, with Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR) values from -11,318 for Lacosamide to -128,482 for Zonisamide. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis validates these results. The ICUR sensitivity is greater for increases in the price of Brivaracetam than for decreases, and for Eslicarbizapine over the other adjunctives considered in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Brivaracetam resulted in cost effective and incremental quality adjusted life years come at an acceptable cost.

Mind the gap: health disparities in families living with epilepsy are significant and linked to socioeconomic status.

There is limited information on disparities of people with epilepsy (PWE) and, foremost, their caregivers. The objective of this study was to comprehensively compare between PWE and caregivers with low socioeconomic status (SES) and those with high SES for disparities in demographic and epilepsy characteristics, treatment and health care utilization, physical and psychosocial impact, and knowledge about epilepsy. PWE and caregivers completed surveys about the aforementioned outcomes during their epilepsy clinic visit or epilepsy monitoring unit admission. Associations were evaluated using SES as a binary independent variable and the patient and caregiver related outcomes as dependent variables. Thirty-eight patients with low SES and 88 patients with high SES were recruited. Patients with low SES were more commonly non-white, uninsured, unemployed, of lower educational attainment and living in larger households. They were more likely to visit the emergency room for their seizures, were more frequently on polypharmacy and experienced more AED adverse effects. They exhibited higher depression and anxiety levels and worse quality of life. Twenty-two caregivers with low SES and 66 caregivers of high SAS were recruited. Caregivers with low SES were more likely to be non-white and single. They manifested poorer knowledge about epilepsy. There are notable inequalities in demographic, treatment-related and health care utilization aspects of care of PWE, as well as in the psychosocial impact of their disease. Additional demographic and epilepsy knowledge-related disparities are recognized in caregivers of PWE. Identification of those disparities is a critical step in the creation of appropriate interventions to eliminate them.

A needs assessment of pediatric epilepsy surgery in Haiti.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy disproportionately affects low- and/or middle-income countries (LMICs). Surgical treatments for epilepsy are potentially curative and cost-effective and may improve quality of life and reduce social stigmas. In the current study, the authors estimate the potential need for a surgical epilepsy program in Haiti by applying contemporary epilepsy surgery referral guidelines to a population of children assessed at the Clinique d'Épilepsie de Port-au-Prince (CLIDEP). METHODS: The authors reviewed 812 pediatric patient records from the CLIDEP, the only pediatric epilepsy referral center in Haiti. Clinical covariates and seizure outcomes were extracted from digitized charts. Electroencephalography (EEG) and neuroimaging reports were further analyzed to determine the prevalence of focal epilepsy or surgically amenable syndromes and to assess the lesional causes of epilepsy in Haiti. Lastly, the toolsforepilepsy instrument was applied to determine the proportion of patients who met the criteria for epilepsy surgery referral. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the patients at CLIDEP (543/812) were determined to have epilepsy based on clinical and diagnostic evaluations. Most of them (82%, 444/543) had been evaluated with interictal EEG, 88% of whom (391/444) had abnormal findings. The most common finding was a unilateral focal abnormality (32%, 125/391). Neuroimaging, a prerequisite for applying the epilepsy surgery referral criteria, had been performed in only 58 patients in the entire CLIDEP cohort, 39 of whom were eventually diagnosed with epilepsy. Two-thirds (26/39) of those patients had abnormal findings on neuroimaging. Most patients (55%, 18/33) assessed with the toolsforepilepsy application met the criteria for epilepsy surgery referral. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings suggest that many children with epilepsy in Haiti could benefit from being evaluated at a center with the capacity to perform basic brain imaging and neurosurgical treatments.

Cost of epilepsy-related health care encounters in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The cost of epilepsy is usually reported as total expenditure over a certain period. However, with the increased availability of acute treatments for use in the community setting, intermittent, single-seizure treatment is now possible in addition to the chronic epilepsy drug treatment paradigm. Data on the cost of discrete health care encounters are needed to substantiate the cost-benefit of these new treatments. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the health plan-paid costs of discrete epilepsy-related health care encounters in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims, Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits (Medicare patients with supplemental insurance), and Multi-State Medicaid research databases. The primary analysis determined health plan-paid cost (adjudicated claims) of discrete epilepsy-related health care encounters, defined as having a primary diagnosis code of epilepsy or convulsion, from 2013 to 2018, in patients with epilepsy aged ≥ 12 years. Costs were adjusted to 2018 prices. Epilepsy cases were defined using ICD-CM codes. We excluded patients on capitated insurance plans as their cost per health care encounter is unknown. RESULTS: In total, 353,530 commercially insured, 378,051 Medicaid, and 69,176 Medicare plus supplemental insurance patients with epilepsy were included. More than 160,000 epilepsy-related emergency transportations, 225,000 emergency department (ED) visits, 49,000 hospitalizations, 700 urgent care visits, and ~2.5 million office visits were analyzed. 37.4% of epilepsy-related hospitalizations included care in the intensive care unit (ICU). In commercially insured patients, epilepsy-related health care encounters had median health plan-paid costs of $22,305 (Q1-Q3 = $14,336-$36,096, hospitalization); $3,375 ($565-$9,095, ICU visit); $1,913 ($417-$4,163, ED visit); $687 ($415-$1,083, emergency transportation); $95 ($23-$232, office visit); and $57 ($0-$171, urgent care visit). The median length of stay for epilepsy-related hospitalizations in working age, commercially insured patients was 4 (Q1-Q3 = 2-5) days. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report health plan-paid cost per epilepsy-related health care encounter. These data can serve as a basis for more granular cost-benefit analyses of not only chronic but also acute treatments of epilepsy. DISCLOSURES: This analysis was funded by UCB Pharma. The sponsor had a role in the identification, design, conduct, and reporting of the analysis. Borghs, Beaty, Boudiaf, and Loewendorf are employees of UCB Pharma. Kalilani and Parekh were employees of UCB Pharma at the time of the analysis. Borghs, Beaty, and Loewendorf have received UCB Pharma stock from their employment. Kalilani and Parekh had received UCB Pharma stock at the time of employment, but no longer hold any. This work was presented in part as a poster at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society; December 7, 2019; Baltimore, MD.

The costs of epilepsy in Australia: A productivity-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the health economic burden of epilepsy for Australians of working age by using life table modeling and to model whether improved seizure control may result in substantial health economic benefits. METHODS: Life table modeling was used for working age Australians aged 15-69 years with epilepsy and the cohort was followed until age 70 years. Published 2017 population and epilepsy-related data regarding epilepsy prevalence, mortality, and productivity were used. This model was then re-simulated, assuming the cohort no longer had epilepsy. Differences in outcomes between these cohorts were attributed to epilepsy. Scenarios were also simulated in which the proportion of seizure-free patients increased from baseline 70% up to 75% and 80%. RESULTS: In 2017, Australians of working age with epilepsy followed until age 70 years were predicted to experience over 14,000 excess deaths, more than 78,000 years of life lost, and over 146,000 productivity-adjusted life years lost due to epilepsy. This resulted in lost gross domestic product (GDP) of US $22.1 billion. Increasing seizure freedom by 5% and 10% would reduce health care costs, save years of life, and translate to US $2.6 billion and US $5.3 billion GDP retained for seizure freedom rates of 75% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the considerable societal and economic burden of epilepsy. Relatively modest improvements in overall seizure control could bring substantial economic benefits.

Economic burden of the persistent morbidity of nodding syndrome on caregivers in affected households in Northern Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Nodding syndrome (NS), is an unexplained form of epilepsy which leads to stunted growth, cognitive decline, and a characteristic nodding of the head. Current data about its impact on households in Uganda is scarce. Therefore, this study aims to assess the economic burden of the persistent morbidity of NS on caregivers in affected households in Northern Uganda. METHODS: A cross-sectional cost-of-care study was conducted from January 2019 to February 2019 in Lakwela village-Northern Uganda in 14 households, who are members of a community-based organization (CBO) established in the village with the support of a Japanese research team, (Uganda-Japan Nodding Syndrome Network). Data was collected through questionnaires. Both direct (medical and non-medical) and indirect (informal care) costs of caregiving were assessed. Indirect costs were valued using the human-capital method as loss of production. RESULTS: Direct costs constituted a higher proportion of costs for NS households, accounting for on average 7.7% of household expenditure. The annual weighted mean cost per NS patient was estimated at 27.6 USD (26.4 USD direct costs, 96.2% and 1.2 USD indirect cost, 3.8%). Average time spent on informal caregiving was 4.4 ±1.7 (standard deviation) hours/week with an estimated annual informal caregiving cost of 24.85 USD and gross domestic product (GDP) loss of 412.40 USD. CONCLUSION: Direct costs due to NS are still high among households in this study. More studies are needed to investigate measures that could help bring down these costs and equally reduce the day-to-day disruption of caregiver's activities; consequently, improving the lives of these affected households and communities.

Clinical predictors of adverse events during continuous video-EEG monitoring in an epilepsy unit.

Patients admitted to epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) for diagnostic and presurgical evaluation have an increased risk of seizure-related injury, particularly in the many cases in which medication is withdrawn. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) in this setting and to analyse associated clinical factors and costs. We evaluated consecutive patients admitted to an EMU at a tertiary care hospital over a 10-year period based on a descriptive, longitudinal study. We analysed the occurrence of AEs (traumatic injury, psychiatric complications, status epilepticus, cardiorespiratory disturbances, and death), investigated potential risk factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and compared admission costs between patients with and without AEs. In total, 411 EMU admissions were studied corresponding to 352 patients (55% women; mean [SD] age: 41.7 [12.1] years). Twenty-five patients (6%) experienced an AE. The most common event was traumatic injury (n=9), followed by status epilepticus (n=8), psychiatric complications (n=7), and cardiorespiratory disturbances (n=1). On comparing patients with and without AEs, we observed that the former were more likely to experience generalized seizures (OR: 7.81; 95% CI: 3.51-12.23; p<0.001) or have more seizures overall during admission (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.42-6.8; p=0.002). Patients with AEs also had longer EMU stays (6.91 [2.64] vs 5.08 [1.1]; p=0.004), longer hospital stays (8.45 [3.6] vs 5.18 [1.2]; p<0.001), and higher costs (€7277.71 [€2743.9] vs €5175.7 [€1182.5]; p<0.001). Patients with generalized seizures and more seizures during admission were at greater risk of AEs, which were associated with higher admission costs.

A Multimodal Telehealth Strategy to Improve Pediatric Epilepsy Care.

A team of providers, researchers, patients, and families created a novel telehealth tool to improve communication across a variety of systems involved in pediatric epilepsy care. This tool facilitates in-home telemedicine appointments and saves costs for patients and hospital systems alike within the context of a population highly affected by health care disparities.

Healthcare utilization and associated costs following initiation of perampanel in patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: We compared health service utilization and costs for patients with epilepsy before and after initiation of perampanel and compared with matched controls. METHOD: Patients were selected from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients initiating perampanel were matched to controls initiating an alternate add-on therapy for the same underlying epilepsy subtype. First prescription defined index date. Primary and secondary care contacts and associated costs were aggregated in the 12 months before and after index date. Secondary care contacts were available for a subset (~60%) of patients. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-three patients treated with perampanel were identified. One hundred and eighty-three (53.4%) were male, mean age was 39.1 (sd: 16.0). Mean epilepsy duration was 21.1 (standard deviation (sd): 13.3) years. Two hundred and eighty-seven (83.7%) were matched to controls. Inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis of epilepsy (0.5 versus 0.2 per patient-year (ppy), p = 0.002) and neurology specific outpatient appointments (3.2 versus 2.9 ppy, p = 0.041) were significantly reduced following initiation with perampanel. Total costs attributable to epilepsy (£1889 to 1477 ppy) and overall secondary costs (£2593 to £2102) were also significantly reduced. There was no significant difference in primary care, outpatient, or general inpatient admissions. Compared with controls, there was a significant reduction in primary epilepsy admissions (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.423; 95% Confidence intervals (CI): 0.198-0.835) but a significant increase in outpatient appointments (1.306; 95% CI: 1.154-1.478) and accident and emergency contacts (1.603; 95% CI: 1.081-2.390) for patients treated with perampanel. CONCLUSION: Treatment with perampanel is associated with reduced epilepsy-related inpatient admissions and accident and emergency contacts.