Overuse throwing injuries in skeletally immature athletes--diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

The number of skeletally immature athletes participating in organized sport is near an all-time high. For nearly half a century, the medical community has investigated the link between shoulder and elbow injuries with repetitive throwing. Despite substantial literature and research, several controversies still exist, including when to begin throwing breaking pitches. Furthermore, despite introduction of pitch recommendations for youth baseball, misconceptions, poor understanding of, and adherence to these guidelines persist. High-velocity and high-volume throwing and throwing while fatigued are significant risk factors for injury. Improved awareness and adherence to throwing guidelines should limit the number of injuries. Proper identification and treatment of injuries when they do occur can allow our skeletally immature athletes to safely return to overhead sports activities.

Prediction of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis using the modified Oxford bone age score.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the modified Oxford bone score can be used as a predictor for the risk of developing contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in children who present with a unilateral slip. METHODS: We identified 260 patients treated for unilateral SCFE between 1980 and 2002 and followed them up to skeletal maturity or until development of contralateral slip. Exclusion criteria included patients with endocrine or metabolic disorder, Down syndrome, and those with radiographs inadequate to determine the modified Oxford bone score. The initial radiographs were given a score ranging from 16 to 26. Statistical analysis was used to determine whether the modified Oxford bone score was predictive of future development of contralateral slip. A linear regression model was used to estimate the probability of future development of a contralateral slip as related to the modified Oxford bone score. RESULTS: Of the 260 patients, 64 (24%) developed a contralateral slip, at an average of 10 months after initial presentation. Race, sex, age, and weight at initial presentation were not predictive of the development of contralateral slip. The modified Oxford score and a triradiate score of 1 were found to be significant (P<0.0001) predictors, with the modified Oxford score a better overall predictor. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Oxford bone age score is the best predictor of the risk of development of a contralateral SCFE in patients presenting with a unilateral slip. Controversy exists regarding prophylactic pinning of a normal hip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE. The benefits of prophylactic pinning must outweigh risk. This study provides probability data for predicting a contralateral slip based on the modified Oxford bone maturity score that can be shared with families and allows physicians to decide their threshold for prophylactically pinning the contralateral hip in patients presenting with a unilateral slip. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV, Case series.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common adolescent hip condition. Its importance lies in its high morbidity if not diagnosed and treated in its early stages, not only in childhood but also as a cause of osteoarthritis in adulthood. This article highlights key diagnostic tools and optimal treatment plans for SCFE. RECENT FINDINGS: SCFE involves displacement between the proximal femoral neck and the femoral head at the level of the open physis, with biomechanical and biochemical factors implicated. Acute major trauma is rarely involved; a gradual onset of symptoms and deformity is more common. Patients with unstable SCFE are in severe pain and unable to bear weight. SCFE occasionally is associated with endocrine or metabolic abnormality (hypothyroidism, panhypopituitarism and renal rickets). On physical examination, limited internal rotation of the affected hip is usual; obligatory external rotation of hip in flexion is classic. Diagnosis is confirmed on anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs of both hips. Treatment is surgical, with stabilization across the physis by in-situ pinning being the gold standard. SUMMARY: Prompt diagnosis and timely surgical treatment usually lead to excellent long-term results with minimal morbidity. It is crucial to recognize that groin pulls are very rare in adolescents. Children with suggestive groin symptoms should have hip anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs to rule out the much more common SCFE.

[Complications of prophylactic pinning for unilateral upper femur epiphysis slipping: retrospective analysis of 62 operated cases]. / Complications du vissage controlatéral préventif en cas d'épiphysiolyse fémorale supérieure unilatérale : à propos d'une série rétrospective de 62 cas opérés.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The appropriate treatment for unilateral slipping of the upper epiphysis of the femur is controversial. Prophylactic surgical treatment raises the risk of bilateralization. The procedure is often unnecessary as the natural history of epiphyseal slipping is often favorable when the displacement is minimal. We analyzed the complications of systematic prophylactic treatment in order to determine the optimal attitude. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective series of 62 children who underwent surgery for unilateral slipping of the superior femoral epiphysis between 1996 and 2005. Prophylactic treatment of the healthy hip was instituted systematically. The complications were noted according to Paley. We searched for factors of risk of complications, studying the bone maturity indexes, the characteristic features of the healthy femur epiphysis and the surgical technique used. RESULTS: There were seven complications, six following prophylactic treatment and one after material removal. The rate of complications reached 11.3%. Five of the complications were minor: two local infections with favorable outcome and three patients who complained of pain in the hip at mobilization, which had totally resolved at one year. One moderate complication was noted: spiral fracture of the upper femur starting from the screw head and treated with plate fixation. The outcome was favorable. There was one severe complication: osteoarthritis of the hip joint with septicemia on day 3. The outcome was unfavorable with necrosis of the femoral head, resection and use of a spacer. A total hip arthroplasty was performed at one year. DISCUSSION: Complications were globally more frequent and more severe compared to series using prophylactic screwing. The major infection complication (osteoarthritis) observed in this series has not been reported elsewhere. There was probably a center effect since we recruited all of the most complex cases in our region. We were unable to identify any factor predictive of complications. There is apparently no clear choice between systematic prophylactic treatment and careful surveillance. Prophylactic treatment in selected patients might be the key to a successful preventive approach.

Review of the management outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and the role of prophylactic contra-lateral pinning re-examined.

INTRODUCTION: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is the most common hip problem in the adolescent age group. It can involve both hips, presenting itself bilaterally at first presentation or sequentially. The overall incidence of bilateral disease is variable, but the risk of occurrence is higher when there is underlying endocrinopathy, renal disease and obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Amongst the 36 cases (44 hips) of slipped capital femoral epiphysis that we had, there were 8 cases of bilateral disease, of which 3 were bilateral sequential slips. A retrospective review of all case records and X-rays was done. RESULTS: According to Aadalen's criteria, the results were excellent or good in 37 hips, fair in 3 hips, and poor in 2 hips. Two patients were considered as treatment failure because of avascular necrosis. The incidence of bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis was 22.2%. The overall average age was 11.4 years. All cases of sequential involvement presented within 15 months of the initial slip. One patient had hypothyroidism (who also had a positive family history for slipped capital femoral epiphysis), while 91.6% were above the 75th percentile for weight. There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI) and weight percentile distribution between patients with unilateral and bilateral disease. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory outcomes can be expected in most patients treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The risk of avascular necrosis is higher in unstable slips. The role of prophylactic contra-lateral pinning should be restricted to patients with hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis disease, especially hypothyroidism.

Chondrolysis, osteonecrosis, and slip severity in patients with subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic pinning of the radiographically and clinically normal contralateral hip in a patient with a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of chondrolysis and osteonecrosis and the degree of slip severity in contralateral hips with a subsequent slipped capital femoral epiphysis to determine whether the outcome or complications on the contralateral side were greater than the risks of prophylactic pinning. METHODS: The medical records of the patients operated on between 1993 and 2003 at a single hospital for treatment of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis were retrospectively evaluated. The severity and the chronicity of the slips were graded. Only children who initially had had a unilateral slip and had been followed for a minimum of twenty-four months or until skeletal maturity were included in the analysis for detection of a subsequent contralateral slip. Patients with more than twelve months of follow-up were included in the analysis for detection of osteonecrosis and chondrolysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients had a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis at the time of the primary admission. A subsequent slip developed in the contralateral hip of eighty-two children (36%) within a mean of 6.5 months. Eighteen of the contralateral slips were of moderate or severe severity, with a potential for a poor outcome due to a risk of osteoarthritis in the future. Osteonecrosis or chondrolysis, each an established complication with a poor long-term prognosis, developed in five of the patients with a subsequent contralateral slip. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of a subsequent contralateral slip (36%) and the potential complication (high slip severity) and established complications (osteonecrosis and chondrolysis) related to the contralateral slip indicate that prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in a patient with a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis is safer than and preferable to observation and symptomatic treatment.

Contralateral slip prediction in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is bone age the answer?

Prophylactic pinning of an asymptomatic hip in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial. Bone age has been used as a predictor of future contralateral slip risk and also in the decision making for prophylactic intervention. The efficacy of bone age at predicting a contralateral slip was tested in this study. Eighteen Caucasian children prospectively had bone age assessment using wrist and hand radiographs when presenting with a unilateral SCFE. After in situ fixation of the affected side prospective monitoring was performed at regular intervals in the outpatient department. Surgical intervention was undertaken if the contralateral hip was symptomatic. Three children (2 boys and 1 girl) went on to develop a contralateral slip at a mean of 20 months from initial presentation. Six children were deemed at risk of contralateral slip due to a bone age of > or = 12.5 years for boys and > or = 10.5 years for girls. Only one from this group developed a contralateral slip. The relative risk of proceeding to a contralateral slip when the bone age is below the designated values was 1 (95% confidence interval of 0.1118 to 8.95). The sensitivity and specificity were 33% and 66% respectively. The positive predictive value was 15% and the diagnostic efficiency was 61%. Although this is a small study, it would appear that delayed bone age by itself is not a good predictor of future contralateral slip. Routine prophylactic pinning is not justified based on bone age alone, with the risks of surgical fixation it carries. A prospective long term longitudinal study is required.

The contralateral slip. An avoidable complication and indication for prophylactic pinning in slipped upper femoral epiphysis.

Between July 1994 and June 2004, 60 patients with 76 slipped upper femoral epiphyses were managed within the adult trauma service of three hospitals. Treatment was by a single cannulated screw. Of these cases, 53 were unilateral, in 17 of which uncomplicated prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was performed. Of the other 36 cases, nine presented with a subsequent slip despite ongoing out-patient care. The subsequent slip was unpredictable in timing and unrelated to the age at the initial slip. It was more often unstable and in one case avascular necrosis developed. The overall rate of avascular necrosis, although in accordance with the literature, was 60% in acute unstable slips with a slip angle greater than 40 degrees. In our experience, prophylactic fixation was safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip.

Proximal femoral epiphysiolysis during reduction of hip dislocation in adolescents.

Traumatic hip dislocation is an uncommon injury in children. The urgency of closed reduction to prevent possible osteonecrosis may present some pitfalls. Adolescents with open proximal femoral physis may have sustained trauma to the physis at the time of dislocation that can lead to displacement of the epiphysis during the reduction maneuver. The purpose of this study is to report 5 cases with this complication and discuss potential etiology and management. All of the 5 patients were between 12 and 16 years old and underwent closed reduction under conscious sedation. Epiphysiolysis of the femoral head was diagnosed after reduction in all 5 patients. Every patient underwent emergent open reduction and internal fixation of the femur and open hip reduction. Avascular necrosis was identified in all 5 patients within 3 to 15 months postinjury. If there is any suspicion of associated physeal injury or if there is any physeal instability noted under fluoroscopy, an open reduction is recommended in the operating room under radiograph guidance to prevent displacement.

Prophylactic contralateral fixation in slipped upper femoral epiphysis: is it safe?

Prophylactic stabilization with internal fixation of the asymptomatic hip in unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial. We present a retrospective analysis of 65 patients who had prophylactic fixation of the uninvolved hip at the same time as their opposite slipped femoral physis. None had an underlying systemic or endocrine abnormality and the average age was 12.5 years (range 11-15 years). A single 7.0 mm cannulated cancellous screw was used in all patients. The average time to fusion was 18 months (range 6-36 months) and duration of follow up ranged from 5 to 8 years (mean 6.5 years). None of the patients had implant removal and at latest review did not show any evidence of chondrolysis, avascular necrosis, premature physeal arrest or secondary arthrosis in the prophylactically fixed hip. One patient (1.5%) developed a superficial wound infection, which was successfully treated by antibiotics. This study demonstrates the safety of prophylactic fixation using a single cannulated cancellous screw and we recommend it for prevention of delayed slip and hence secondary osteoarthrosis.

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine, with use of expected-value decision analysis, the optimal management strategy-prophylactic in situ pinning versus observation-for the contralateral hip. METHODS: Outcome probabilities were determined from a systematic review of the literature. Utility values were obtained from a questionnaire on patient preferences completed with use of a visual analog scale by twenty-five adolescent male patients without slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A decision tree was constructed, fold-back analysis was performed to determine the optimal treatment, and one and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect on decision-making of varying outcome probabilities and utilities. RESULTS: Observation was the optimal management strategy for the contralateral hip given the outcome probabilities and utilities that we studied (the expected value was 9.5 for observation and 9.2 for prophylactic in situ pinning, with a marginal value of 0.3). Increased rates of a late second slip favored prophylactic in situ pinning (the threshold probability was 27%). Risk-taking patients with a high utility for uncomplicated prophylactic in situ pinning favored prophylaxis (the threshold utility was 9.8). CONCLUSIONS: The iatrogenic risks of treating a healthy patient or an uninvolved body part rarely outweigh the potential benefits unless the probability of the adverse event is likely and the consequences of the adverse event are very severe. In this decision analysis, the optimal decision was observation. In cases where the probability of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis exceeds 27% or in cases where reliable follow-up is not feasible, pinning of the contralateral hip is favored. For a given individual patient, the optimal strategy depends not only on probabilities of the various outcomes but also on personal preference. Thus, we advocate a model of doctor-patient shared decision-making in which both the outcome probabilities and the patient preferences are considered in order to optimize the decision-making process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and decision analysis, Level III-1 (limited alternatives and costs; poor estimates). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk-benefit analysis of prophylactic pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

There is a broad and controversial discussion about the surgical procedure and the type of hardware for internal transfixation of the epiphysis and metaphysis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Prophylactic pinning is even more controversial. One hundred and nine patients showing SCFE underwent a one-stage bilateral fixation of the epiphysis with three or four Kirschner wires (pins). From these 109 patients (69 male and 40 female), 94 had an unilateral slip and were operated prophylactically on the contralateral side. There were no complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head, chondrolysis, bone fracture, failure of metal implant, osteomyelitis or deep wound infection either at the time of surgery or at the minimum follow-up of 1 year with prophylactic pinning in SCFE. Therefore, we consider pinning allows for efficient stabilization, reliably preventing any progression of SCFE on the affected side and, furthermore, prevents the incidence of a secondary slip on the primarily nondisplaced contralateral side. The transfixation of epiphysis and metaphysis with Kirschner wires (pins) shows good subjective and objective long-term results compared with other surgical methods and implants. There is only a low morbidity rate with this method, because reoperations may only become necessary in the younger age group owing to normal growth of the femoral neck, compared with a high benefit from prophylactic surgical treatment of the nonaffected opposite side at the time of unilateral onset of the disease. The pins may no longer catch the epiphysis but further growth will allow for remodeling of the femoral head and for an optimal neck/shaft ratio. In case of further growth and relative shortening of the pins, refixation may become necessary. Therefore, we like to recommend the Kirschner-wire transfixation (pinning) of the epiphysis and metaphysis in patients with SCFE for primary treatment of SCFE as well as for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral side in one sitting.

Epidemiological perspective on prophylactic pinning in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

The purpose of this review was to determine whether the literature supports in situ prophylactic pinning of the hip contralateral to a hip with a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Three hundred twenty-five articles on SCFE between 1931 and 1998 were reviewed. Two hundred six studies were used to establish normative data. Patients with a unilateral SCFE were 2,335 times more likely to develop a SCFE in the contralateral hip when compared to children in the general population experiencing an initial SCFE. Because a majority of these sequential SCFEs were detected and treated early, we concluded that close follow-up and not prophylactic pinning was most supported by the literature.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The prevalence of late contralateral slip.

We evaluated the prevalence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in the contralateral hip of 169 children who had been managed with pinning in situ and thirty who had been managed with immobilization in a spica cast. Only children who had initially been seen with a unilateral slip and had been followed for a minimum of two years or until skeletal maturity were included in the study. The average duration of follow-up was 3.6 years (range, 0.5 to 9.5 years) for the group that had been managed with a cast and 2.8 years (range, 1.0 to 8.3 years) for the group that had been managed operatively. In sixty-one (36 per cent) of the 169 patients who had had operative treatment and two (7 per cent) of the thirty who had been managed with a spica cast, a slip subsequently developed in the contralateral hip; this difference was significant (p = 0.001). On the basis of these findings, we recommend that closer attention be paid to the potential development of a slip in the contralateral hip after pinning.

Prophylactic pinning in slipped upper femoral epiphysis. Prevention of complications.

We report the complications of prophylactic pinning of slipped upper femoral epiphysis with Crawford Adams pins in 95 cases. Complications of pin placement were seen in 13.7%. Although seven hips had penetration of the joint, there were no cases of chondrolysis or avascular necrosis. Excavation of the lateral femoral cortex was required at pin removal in 12.5% of cases. Analysis of the growth around pins allowed recommendations to be made regarding pin protrusion. The use of improved fixation devices may reduce the need for multiple pins.

Estudo crítico da indicaçäo da pinagem preventiva do lado sadio na epifisiótise proximal do fêmur unilateral / Critical evaluation of the indication of preventive pinning of the contralateral side in unilateral proximal epiphysiolysis of the femur

Baseados no estudo de 60 pacientes portadores de epifisiólise proximal do fêmur e na revisäo da literatura, discutem-se indicaçäo da pinagem preventiva do lado sadio. Estabelecem-se o conceito de quadril em risco de deslizamento e admitem-se a pinagem contralateral, quando um ou mais dos fatores que preidspöem-se ao escorregamento estäo presentes