Delayed epistaxis after endoscopic transnasal pituitary tumor resection: clinical characteristics, risk factors, treatment and prevention.

BACKGROUND: Delayed epistaxis after endoscopic transnasal pituitary tumor resection (ETPTR) is a critical complication, tending to cause aspiration or hemorrhagic shock. This study assessed clinical characteristics, risk factors, and provide treatment and prevention advice of this complication. METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric analysis of 862 patients who underwent ETPTR. Statistical analyses of clinical data revealed the incidence, sources and onset time of delayed epistaxis. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: The incidence of delayed epistaxis was 2.78% (24/862), with an average onset time of 20.71 ± 7.39 days. The bleeding sources were: posterior nasal septal artery branch of sphenopalatine artery (12/24), multiple inflammatory mucosae (8/24), sphenopalatine artery trunk (3/24) and sphenoid sinus bone (1/24). Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis confirmed that hypertension, nasal septum deviation, chronic rhinosinusitis and growth hormone pituitary tumor subtype were independent risk factors for delayed epistaxis. Sex, age, history of diabetes, tumor size, tumor invasion and operation time were not associated with delayed epistaxis. All patients with delayed epistaxis were successfully managed through endoscopic transnasal hemostasis without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed epistaxis after ETPTR tends to have specific onset periods and risk factors. Prevention of these characteristics may reduce the occurrence of delayed epistaxis. Endoscopic transnasal hemostasis is recommended as the preferred treatment for delayed epistaxis.

Telangiectasias, recurrent epistaxis and a strong family history-a case of Osler- Weber-Rendu Syndrome in Pakistan.

Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome or Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare condition, with very few reported cases, especially in Pakistan. As healthcare workers, we encounter multiple cases of recurrent epistaxis in the emergency as well as outpatient departments. However, patients are usually treated symptomatically without a thorough workup. HHT should be considered among the differentials for recurrent epistaxis, as a clinical diagnosis can be made with detailed family history and physical examination. Here is the case of a 58-year-old male who presented to the Gastroenterology OPD, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore, in November 2021, with complaints of generalised weakness and blood in stools. He had a history of recurrent epistaxis and telangiectasias, and further inquiry revealed a strong family history of similar symptoms. He was diagnosed as a case of Osler-Weber- Rendu Syndrome. Informed consent was taken from the patient prior to the writing of the manuscript.

Acute epistaxis: a comprehensive overview in the acute care setting.

Epistaxis is a common problem in pediatric patients. Most cases are benign in nature and resolve with minimal intervention. However, there are many unusual conditions that present with epistaxis that can be very serious and should be promptly investigated and treated. This review aids in the distinction between the benign causes of epistaxis and those that are more serious and require further evaluation. The various etiologies of epistaxis are discussed, and recommendations for general and scenario-specific management of pediatric patients with epistaxis are provided.

Case report of recurrent epistaxis caused by a live leech in the nasal cavity.

RATIONALE: Epistaxis is one of the common emergencies in otolaryngology. There are many causes of epistaxis, but reports of epistaxis due to nasal foreign bodies like leeches are rare. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 55-year-old male presented with "repeated epistaxis for over 20 days." Nasal endoscopy revealed a live leech in the olfactory area of the left nostril. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with epistaxis caused by a live leech in the nasal cavity. INTERVENTIONS: Under nasal endoscopy, the leech was grasped with a vascular clamp and removed from the nasal cavity. The leech measured 8 cm in length. Hemostasis was achieved using a gelatin sponge at the wound site, and the nasal cavity was packed with Vaseline gauze. OUTCOMES: The live leech was removed via nasal endoscopy. Two days later, the Vaseline gauze packing was removed, and the patient experienced no further nasal bleeding. CONCLUSION: Live leeches in the nasal cavity can cause epistaxis. Nasal endoscopic removal of the live leech is an effective treatment. LESSON: There are many causes of epistaxis, which are nonspecific and prone to missed or incorrect diagnosis. In patients with a history of fieldwork or direct contact with leeches who present with recurrent nasal bleeding, the possibility of epistaxis caused by a live leech should be considered, and timely and effective treatment should be provided.

Beware of epistaxis: fatal pseudoaneurysm rupture 30 years after treatment of acromegaly.

We present a fatal complication of treatment in a patient with early-onset acromegaly, treated with two transsphenoidal operations, radiotherapy, radiosurgery and pegvisomant. He was diagnosed in his 30s, and controlled from his 40s, with stable residual tumour within the left cavernous sinus. In his 60s, 30 years after surgery/radiotherapy and 14 years after radiosurgery, he developed recurrent episodes of mild epistaxis. A week later, he presented at his local hospital's emergency department with severe epistaxis and altered consciousness. He was diagnosed with a ruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudoaneurysm, but unfortunately died before treatment could be attempted.ICA pseudoaneurysms are rare complications of surgery or radiotherapy and can present with several years of delay, often with epistaxis. This case highlights the importance of life-long monitoring in patients with previous pituitary interventions and early recognition of epistaxis as a herald sign of a potentially catastrophic event, thus leading to timely treatment.

Nasal Disorders.

Nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and epistaxis are common presenting concerns in primary care clinics. Nasal disorders affect the quality of life for many children and families. Rarely, these complaints may represent a life-threatening condition among infant obligate nasal breathers or cases of unusual pathology. The most common causes of rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction vary by age and include physiologic, infectious, allergic, foreign body, irritant, and traumatic causes. Less commonly, children may have congenital malformations, sinonasal masses, or autoimmune disease. The most common causes of epistaxis are inflammatory, environmental, and traumatic causes and medication misuse, but rarely, children may have predisposing anatomic, hematologic, or vascular abnormalities or even sinonasal tumors. In this article, we provide a thorough review of the common nasal disorders treated every day in primary care clinics and mention briefly some of the rare but serious cases that may be overlooked without considering a full differential diagnosis.

Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia of the maxillary sinus extending into the contralateral nasal cavity.

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH) predominantly occurs in the subcutaneous and dermal regions and rarely originates from the sinonasal mucosa. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on the case of a 58-year-old male patient who presented with progressive bilateral nasal obstruction, left-sided epiphora, and intermittent epistaxis. Computed tomography revealed a soft tissue opacity in the left maxillary sinus with intersinusoidal nasal wall demineralization, extending into the surrounding ethmoid cells and the right nasal cavity through a contralateral deviation of the nasal septum. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging further confirmed these findings. The IPEH originating from the maxillary sinus extended into the contralateral nasal cavity, and it was successfully removed using an endoscopic endonasal approach, avoiding overly aggressive treatment. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the diagnostic challenges of IPEH in the sinonasal region and the importance of considering IPEH as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with nasal obstruction, epiphora, and intermittent epistaxis.

Usefulness of endoscopic endonasal underwater surgery using a combination of coblation and a lens-cleaning system for hemostasis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Hemostatic procedures for controlling nasal bleeding in refractory diseases such as hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) can be challenging. In this report, we present a novel technique for underwater endoscopic endonasal hemostatic surgery, which was performed on a 69-year-old man with HHT. The patient had been experiencing frequent episodes of nasal bleeding and had many telangiectasias in the nasal cavity, which were the cause of the bleeding. These telangiectasias were effectively treated using a coblation device in combination with an endoscope lens-cleaning system that supplied saline to create stable underwater conditions. There are several advantages to this technique, including provision of a stable and clear endoscopic field of view, allowing for better visualization of the surgical site. This makes it easier to identify bleeding points and ensure accurate hemostasis. Additionally, the hydrostatic pressure created by the underwater environment helps to reduce bleeding during the procedure. However, it is important to take careful precautions to prevent water from entering the lower airway. With this precautionary measure, this technique is particularly useful in managing bleeding in patients with HHT.

Severe unilateral refractory epistaxis arising from the septal branch of the anterior ethmoid artery.

KEY POINTS: The septal branch of the anterior ethmoid artery (sbAEA) is an underrecognized source of severe refractory epistaxis. Herein, we describe the presentation, predisposing factors, treatment strategies, and outcomes of a series of patients with this condition.

Risk Factors and Management Outcomes in Pediatric Epistaxis at an Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Most cases of pediatric epistaxis are spontaneous and self-resolve. However, a subset of children may experience significant bleeding and require procedural or medical intervention. OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify risk factors associated with moderate and severe epistaxis in the emergency department (ED) and explore management outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients under 22 years old with epistaxis who presented to our ED between 2013 and 2022. Epistaxis severity was defined as mild (required nasal compression or intranasal medications), moderate (required cautery or packing), or severe (required factor replacement, transfusion, hospital admission, or surgery). We performed univariable and multinomial regression analyses, with risk factors and outcomes analyzed according to severity. RESULTS: Of 858 visits, 41 (5%) patients had moderate and 67 (8%) had severe epistaxis. Patients with moderate epistaxis were older than those with mild and severe epistaxis (median 15.6 vs. 8.3 vs. 10.7 years, p < 0.001). In regression analysis, moderate epistaxis was associated with older age, prior ED visit within 72 h, and antiplatelet medication use (p < 0.01). Severe epistaxis was associated with bleeding disorders, nasal procedures within 30 days, and anticoagulation medication use (p ≤ 0.001). Bleeding over 30 min prior to arrival was associated with both moderate and severe epistaxis (p < 0.05). Of the 67 patients with severe epistaxis, 10 (15%) required factor replacement, 28 (42%) required transfusion, 52 (77%) required hospital admission, and 5 (7%) underwent surgery. CONCLUSION: Epistaxis severity is associated with certain risk factors. However, most cases of pediatric epistaxis are mild and do not require intervention or ED evaluation.

Managing recurrent nosebleeds in children: a retrospective review of 718 children attending a nurse-led epistaxis clinic.

OBJECTIVE: This review assessed the effectiveness of the nurse-led children's epistaxis clinic in streamlining patient care and avoiding unnecessary general anaesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective case note review was conducted of children attending the nurse-led epistaxis clinic between 2019 and 2021. RESULTS: A total of 718 children were seen over three years. Twelve (1.7 per cent) had a known coagulopathy. Of the children, 590 (82 per cent) had visible vessels and 29 (4 per cent) had mucosal crusting. Silver nitrate cautery was attempted under topical anaesthesia in 481 children, with 463 (96 per cent) successful cauterisations. Fifteen (3 per cent) were cauterised under general anaesthesia. Of the children, 706 (99 per cent) were prescribed nasal antiseptic preparations; this was the sole treatment for 58 (8 per cent). Blood investigations were requested for eight children (1 per cent) and haematology referral for three (0.4 per cent). CONCLUSION: This is the largest published series of children's nosebleeds. Given the short-lived benefit from cautery, it is suggested that general anaesthesia should not be offered routinely. However, improved haematology referral criteria are required to increase underlying diagnosis.

Plus moist HS-W®: a new nasal packing material for the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery.

PURPOSE: Removal of the current calcium alginate packing materials to the middle meatus in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is usually accompanied by discomfort or pain owing to the hard and brittle nature of these materials. Plus moist HS-W® is a new calcium alginate packing material released in 2022 developed to overcome this issue by changing the uronic acid component. We aimed to compare the discomfort/pain during the removal of Plus moist HS-W® with Kaltostat®, as well as their suitability as packing materials in ESS. METHODS: Kaltostat® and Plus moist HS-W® were used as packing materials in 22 and 21 patients who underwent ESS in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Patients were asked to rate the pain during the packing removal 10 days after ESS using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The ratio of residual packing materials, number of suctions (insertions/extractions of the suction cannula), and time required to remove packing materials were measured. Postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, local infection, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and synechia of the middle meatus were also evaluated. RESULTS: The Plus moist HS-W® group exhibited significantly lower NRS pain scores, a lower ratio of residual packing materials, a reduced number of suctions, and a shorter time required to remove the packing. No obvious postoperative complications occurred in both groups except for one suspicious case of a slight infection in the Kaltostat® group. CONCLUSION: Compared with Kaltostat®, Plus moist HS-W®, characterized by better gelatinization than Kaltostat®, benefits patients by minimizing discomfort/pain during removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Maxillofacial haemorrhagic symptoms in emergency department patients: impact of antithrombotics.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of antithrombotics on the occurrence of maxillofacial haemorrhagic symptoms, and to determine if these haemorrhagic symptoms are predictors of maxillofacial fractures. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was conducted of consecutive patients with maxillofacial trauma who had been admitted to the emergency department of four hospitals in the Netherlands. This study compared five haemorrhagic symptoms (peri-orbital haematoma, raccoon eyes, epistaxis, subconjunctival ecchymosis, and intra-oral haematoma) between patients not-using (NUA) and using (UA) of antithrombotics, and whether these maxillofacial haemorrhagic symptoms served as predictors for maxillofacial fractures. RESULTS: Out of the 1005 patients, 812 (81%) belonged to the NUA group, and 193 (19%) to the UA group. UA patients exhibited higher frequencies of peri-orbital hematoma (54% vs. 39%, p < 0.001), raccoon eyes (10% vs. 5%, p = 0.01), and subconjunctival ecchymoses (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). In NUA, peri-orbital hematoma (OR = 2.5, p < 0.001), epistaxis (OR = 4.1, p < 0.001), subconjunctival ecchymosis (OR = 2.3, p = 0.02), and intra-oral hematoma (OR = 7.1, p < 0.001) were significant fracture predictors. Among UA, peri-orbital hematoma (OR = 2.2, p = 0.04), epistaxis (OR = 5.4, p < 0.001), subconjunctival ecchymosis (OR = 3.7, p = 0.008), and intra-oral hematoma (OR = 22.0, p < 0.001) were significant fracture predictors. CONCLUSION: Maxillofacial haemorrhagic symptoms were observed more frequently in the UA group than in the NUA group. However, in both groups, maxillofacial haemorrhagic symptoms appear to be predictors of maxillofacial fractures. Caution is warranted in attributing these symptoms solely to antithrombotic use during emergency department assessments.

Comparison of side effects and patient perceptions towards Rapid Rhino and Merocel packs in epistaxis.

OBJECTIVE: Non-dissolvable nasal packs (Rapid Rhino and Merocel) are widely used in secondary healthcare centres for the control of epistaxis, with some side effects. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted of adults who required Rapid Rhino or Merocel packing for acute epistaxis management in a large healthcare centre between March 2020 and 2021. A validated modified version of the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test was used. RESULTS: A total of 80 adults requiring non-dissolvable packs were recruited. Seventy per cent of patients had Rapid Rhino packs inserted. Embarrassment was greater in patients who used Rapid Rhino than Merocel. Merocel packs had a significantly higher mean pain score on removal compared to Rapid Rhino. There was no correlation between rebleed rate and type of nasal pack used. CONCLUSION: Non-dissolvable Rapid Rhino and Merocel nasal packs have similar efficacy in controlling epistaxis. Rapid Rhino packs are more embarrassing for patients in comparison to Merocel packs, but are less painful to remove.

Epistaxis and Facial Swelling Due to Nasal Blastomycosis in a Cat.

A 5 yr old castrated male domestic longhair was examined because of left-sided facial swelling and epistaxis. Head computed tomography with contrast identified a mass within the left nasal cavity and multifocal regions of nasal bone osteolysis. Histopathology of nasal mass biopsies and cytology of the facial swelling revealed pyogranulomatous inflammation due to Blastomyces dermatitidis. The cat experienced resolution of clinical signs following 8 mo of treatment with itraconazole. Although rare, clinicians should include blastomycosis on the differential diagnoses list of infectious causes for feline nasal disease if within an endemic area.

Double jeopardy, glomangiopericytoma and Glanzmann thrombasthenia resulting in recurrent epistaxis: a case report.

Glanzmann thrombasthenia is a rare bleeding disorder induced by inherited defects of the platelet membrane αIIbß3 glycoprotein. Glomangiopericytoma, on the other hand, is a very rare sinonasal tumor demonstrating a perivascular myoid phenotype. We herein report the first described case in the literature of Glanzmann thrombasthenia and glomangiopericytoma. The patient is a 40-year-old man diagnosed with type 1 Glanzmann thrombasthenia who presented with repetitive and profuse posterior epistaxis initially managed with platelet transfusions and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Due to the unresolved epistaxis, nasal endoscopy was performed revealing a vascularized tumor. Subsequently, a sphenopalatine artery embolization followed by a surgical excision of the tumor was performed. The pathology report diagnosis of the tumor was glomangiopericytoma. This case sheds the lights on a very rare cause of epistaxis in a patient with Glanzmann thrombasthenia, with a challenging multidisciplinary management. A local cause of epistaxis should always be considered even in case of a diagnosed bleeding disorder, especially when the bleeding is recurrent.