Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 30(3): 16, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717564

ABSTRACT

Australia II became the first foreign yacht to win the America's Cup in 1983. The boat had a revolutionary wing keel and a better underwater hull form. In official documents, Ben Lexcen is credited with the design. He is also listed as the sole inventor of the wing keel in a patent application submitted on February 5, 1982. However, as reported in New York Times, Sydney Morning Herald, and Professional Boatbuilder, the wing keel was in fact designed by engineer Peter van Oossanen at the Netherlands Ship Model Basin in Wageningen, assisted by Dr. Joop Slooff at the National Aerospace Laboratory in Amsterdam. Based on telexes, letters, drawings, and other documents preserved in his personal archive, this paper presents van Oossanen's account of how the revolutionary wing keel was designed. This is followed by an ethical analysis by Martin Peterson, in which he applies the American NSPE and Dutch KIVI codes of ethics to the information provided by van Oossanen. The NSPE and KIVI codes give conflicting advice about the case, and it is not obvious which document is most relevant. This impasse is resolved by applying a method of applied ethics in which similarity-based reasoning is extended to cases that are not fully similar. The key idea, presented in Peterson's book The Ethics of Technology (Peterson, The ethics of technology: A geometric analysis of five moral principles, Oxford University Press, 2017), is to use moral paradigm cases as reference points for constructing a "moral map".


Subject(s)
Engineering , Engineering/ethics , Humans , Codes of Ethics/history , Ethical Analysis , Netherlands , Equipment Design/ethics , Ships , Australia , Inventions/ethics , Inventions/history
2.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 26(1): 387-403, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30903370

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes that autonomous vehicles should be designed to reduce light pollution. In support of this specific proposal, a moral assessment of autonomous vehicles more comprehensive than the dilemmatic life-and-death questions of trolley problem-style situations is presented. The paper therefore consists of two interrelated arguments. The first is that autonomous vehicles are currently still a technology in development, and not one that has acquired its definitive shape, meaning the design of both the vehicles and the surrounding infrastructure is open-ended. Design for values is utilized to articulate a path forward, by which engineering ethics should strive to incorporate values into a technology during its development phase. Second, it is argued that nighttime lighting-a critical supporting infrastructure-should be a prima facie consideration for autonomous vehicles during their development phase. It is shown that a reduction in light pollution, and more boldly a better balance of lighting and darkness, can be achieved via the design of future autonomous vehicles. Two case studies are examined (parking lots and highways) through which autonomous vehicles may be designed for "driving in the dark." Nighttime lighting issues are thus inserted into a broader ethics of autonomous vehicles, while simultaneously introducing questions of autonomous vehicles into debates about light pollution.


Subject(s)
Automation/ethics , Automobiles/ethics , Environmental Pollution/ethics , Equipment Design/ethics , Lighting/ethics , Social Values , Humans
3.
Semin Perinatol ; 43(8): 151176, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31662216

ABSTRACT

Currently, the majority of medical devices are designed for adults; some are then miniaturized for use in neonates. This process neglects population-specific testing that would ensure that the medical devices used for neonates are actually safe and effective for that group. Incorporating human-centered design principles and utilizing methods to evaluate devices that include simulation and clinical testing can improve the safety of devices used in caring for neonates. However, significant regulatory, financial, social and ethical barriers to development remain. In order to overcome these barriers and create a pipeline of safe and effective neonatal medical devices, specific incentives are required.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design , Infant Care/instrumentation , Patient Safety , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment Design/instrumentation , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal/methods , Pediatrics/instrumentation , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29757221

ABSTRACT

This paper analyzes children’s imaginaries of Human-Robots Interaction (HRI) in the context of social robots in healthcare, and it explores ethical and social issues when designing a social robot for a children’s hospital. Based on approaches that emphasize the reciprocal relationship between society and technology, the analytical force of imaginaries lies in their capacity to be embedded in practices and interactions as well as to affect the construction and applications of surrounding technologies. The study is based on a participatory process carried out with six-year-old children for the design of a robot. Imaginaries of HRI are analyzed from a care-centered approach focusing on children’s values and practices as related to their representation of care. The conceptualization of HRI as an assemblage of interactions, the prospective bidirectional care relationships with robots, and the engagement with the robot as an entity of multiple potential robots are the major findings of this study. The study shows the potential of studying imaginaries of HRI, and it concludes that their integration in the final design of robots is a way of including ethical values in it.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design , Hospitals, Pediatric , Imagination , Robotics , Social Behavior , Child , Community-Based Participatory Research , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment Design/methods , Equipment Design/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Psychology, Child , Robotics/ethics , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/methods , Social Values
5.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 14(1): 7-12, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28210847

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the heart failure population continues to age, the need for definitive therapies such as ventricular assist devices (VADs) to extend life and alleviate suffering from end-stage disease directly increases. The goal of this article is to examine the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice within the context of long-term VAD patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Survival rates in VAD-implanted patients have improved in parallel with modernization of device design and surgical technique, reaching that of cardiac transplantation at 1 year post-procedure. Even the sickest patients, those once deemed transplant-ineligible, have been proven to benefit from device implantation and in some cases to a point of becoming eligible for cardiac transplantation. Nevertheless, VAD implantation remains a high-risk procedure with in-hospital mortality rates reaching up to 27% post-procedure and requires intensive upkeep even after successful implantation. Furthermore, end-of-life decisions are complicated by consideration of device deactivation in patients who may not die immediately from an otherwise lethal pathophysiology. Ethical considerations in selection of patients, goals of implantation, and length of therapy become important to preserve the efficacy of treatment and maximize resource utilization. Advanced directives, shared decision-making, and multi-disciplinary approach to treatment have been shown to improve outcomes with respect to both survival and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/ethics , Aging , Equipment Design/ethics , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Transplantation , Humans , Patient Selection/ethics , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
6.
Am J Public Health ; 107(4): 532-537, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28207327

ABSTRACT

With the potential to save nearly 30 000 lives per year in the United States, autonomous vehicles portend the most significant advance in auto safety history by shifting the focus from minimization of postcrash injury to collision prevention. I have delineated the important public health implications of autonomous vehicles and provided a brief analysis of a critically important ethical issue inherent in autonomous vehicle design. The broad expertise, ethical principles, and values of public health should be brought to bear on a wide range of issues pertaining to autonomous vehicles.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Automobiles , Equipment Design/ethics , Public Health , Consumer Product Safety , Humans , United States/epidemiology
7.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 23(3): 723-742, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27557704

ABSTRACT

Stakeholder involvement in design is desirable from both a practical and an ethical point of view. It is difficult to do well, however, and some problems recur again and again, both of a practical nature, e.g. stakeholders acting strategically rather than openly, and of an ethical nature, e.g. power imbalances unduly affecting the outcome of the process. Hidden Design has been proposed as a method to deal with the practical problems of stakeholder involvement. It aims to do so by taking the observation of stakeholder actions, rather than the outcomes of a deliberative process, as its input. Furthermore, it hides from stakeholders the fact that a design process is taking place so that they will not behave differently than they otherwise would. Both aspects of Hidden Design have raised ethical worries. In this paper I make an ethical analysis of what it means for a design process to leave participants uninformed or deceived rather than acquiring their informed consent beforehand, and to use observation of actions rather than deliberation as input for design, using Hidden Design as a case study. This analysis is based on two sets of normative guidelines: the ethical guidelines for psychological research involving deception or uninformed participants from two professional psychological organisations, and Habermasian norms for a fair and just (deliberative) process. It supports the conclusion that stakeholder involvement in design organised in this way can be ethically acceptable, though under a number of conditions and constraints.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design/ethics , Industrial Development/ethics , Equipment Design/psychology , Ethical Analysis , Humans , Informed Consent/psychology
8.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 221: 46-50, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27071874

ABSTRACT

Mobile technologies are constantly evolving and with the development of Internet of Things we can expect continuous increase of various applications. Mobile technologies have undeniable opportunities to play an important role in health services. Concerning purely technical aspects, almost every problem can be solved. However, there are still many unsolved and unclear issues related with ethics and governance mechanisms for mobile phone applications. These issues are even more critical in medical and health care applications of mobile technologies. This paper tries to analyse ethical, and privacy-related challenges that may occur when introducing Personal Portable Devices (PPD) to collect and record personal health data in health care and welfare environment.


Subject(s)
Computer Security/ethics , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Internet/ethics , Mobile Applications/ethics , Telemedicine/ethics , Telemedicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Internet/legislation & jurisprudence , Mobile Applications/legislation & jurisprudence
9.
Sci Adv ; 2(1): e1501101, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26763827

ABSTRACT

Strategies for efficient charge confinement in nanocrystal floating gates to realize high-performance memory devices have been investigated intensively. However, few studies have reported nanoscale experimental validations of charge confinement in closely packed uniform nanocrystals and related device performance characterization. Furthermore, the system-level integration of the resulting devices with wearable silicon electronics has not yet been realized. We introduce a wearable, fully multiplexed silicon nonvolatile memory array with nanocrystal floating gates. The nanocrystal monolayer is assembled over a large area using the Langmuir-Blodgett method. Efficient particle-level charge confinement is verified with the modified atomic force microscopy technique. Uniform nanocrystal charge traps evidently improve the memory window margin and retention performance. Furthermore, the multiplexing of memory devices in conjunction with the amplification of sensor signals based on ultrathin silicon nanomembrane circuits in stretchable layouts enables wearable healthcare applications such as long-term data storage of monitored heart rates.


Subject(s)
Computer Storage Devices , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Nanotechnology/instrumentation , Silicon/chemistry , Electronics/instrumentation , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment Design/methods , Microscopy, Atomic Force/methods , Nanostructures/chemistry , Nanotechnology/methods
10.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 22(4): 1171-1191, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26208574

ABSTRACT

The introduction of new energy technologies may lead to public resistance and contestation. It is often argued that this phenomenon is caused by an inadequate inclusion of relevant public values in the design of technology. In this paper we examine the applicability of the value sensitive design (VSD) approach. While VSD was primarily introduced for incorporating values in technological design, our focus in this paper is expanded towards the design of the institutions surrounding these technologies, as well as the design of stakeholder participation. One important methodological challenge of VSD is to identify the relevant values related to new technological developments. In this paper, we argue that the public debate can form a rich source from which to retrieve the values at stake. To demonstrate this, we have examined the arguments used in the public debate regarding the exploration and exploitation of shale gas in the Netherlands. We identified two important sets of the underlying values, namely substantive and procedural values. This paper concludes with two key findings. Firstly, contrary to what is often suggested in the literature, both proponents and opponents seem to endorse the same values. Secondly, contestation seems to arise in the precise operationalization of these values among the different stakeholders. In other words, contestation in the Dutch shale gas debate does not arise from inter-value conflict but rather from intra-value conflicts. This multi-interpretability should be incorporated in VSD processes.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design/ethics , Natural Gas/standards , Technology/standards , Equipment Design/standards , Netherlands , Technology/ethics
11.
J Med Eng Technol ; 39(7): 395-403, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26453037

ABSTRACT

There is increasing recognition of the importance of user-centred design and testing in the healthcare technology domain. Challenges associated with user and stakeholder involvement in designing solutions for healthcare are recognized in the literature and need to be addressed to facilitate the development of new technology that is usable and acceptable to the end-user. The Devices for Dignity Health Technology Cooperative (D4D) has been involved in a range of technology development projects with an underpinning approach of addressing unmet needs through user involvement. This paper provides practical examples of some of the challenges that occur at different stages during a user-centred design process including ethical approval processes; stakeholder and user recruitment and involvement; eliciting needs from users regarding sensitive and personal issues; and interdisciplinary working. The paper will describe some of the strategies that have been employed by D4D to overcome these challenges and facilitate technology development.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology/ethics , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment and Supplies/ethics , Patient Participation/methods , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Self-Help Devices/ethics , Biomedical Technology/instrumentation , Humans , Patient-Centered Care/ethics , Personhood , United Kingdom
12.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 10(3): 411-20, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23668711

ABSTRACT

Medical devices are peculiar products: their definition varies from country to country, they are used to treat diseases and they are different from pharmaceuticals. In 2012, the authors began to describe the complex and demanding environment of the medical device industry. In this article, the authors' previous research is extended with additional peculiarities of medical devices such as recall, pricing and adoption factors.


Subject(s)
Device Approval , Equipment and Supplies , Equipment Design/economics , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment and Supplies/economics , Equipment and Supplies/ethics , Humans , Product Recalls and Withdrawals/ethics
13.
Br Dent J ; 214(2): 46-7, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23348434
14.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 19(1): 139-60, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21800171

ABSTRACT

This article addresses prospective and retrospective responsibility issues connected with medical robotics. It will be suggested that extant conceptual and legal frameworks are sufficient to address and properly settle most retrospective responsibility problems arising in connection with injuries caused by robot behaviours (which will be exemplified here by reference to harms occurred in surgical interventions supported by the Da Vinci robot, reported in the scientific literature and in the press). In addition, it will be pointed out that many prospective responsibility issues connected with medical robotics are nothing but well-known robotics engineering problems in disguise, which are routinely addressed by roboticists as part of their research and development activities: for this reason they do not raise particularly novel ethical issues. In contrast with this, it will be pointed out that novel and challenging prospective responsibility issues may emerge in connection with harmful events caused by normal robot behaviours. This point will be illustrated here in connection with the rehabilitation robot Lokomat.


Subject(s)
Behavior , Engineering/ethics , Equipment Design/ethics , Robotics/ethics , Social Responsibility , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Humans , Male , Time
17.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 14(2): 201-18, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18425601

ABSTRACT

Modern engineering is complicated by an enormous number of uncertainties. Engineers know a great deal about the material world and how it works. But due to the inherent limits of testing and the complexities of the world outside the lab, engineers will never be able to fully predict how their creations will behave. One way the uncertainties of engineering can be dealt with is by actively monitoring technologies once they have left the development and production stage. This article uses an episode in the history of automobile air bags as an example of engineers who had the foresight and initiative to carefully track the technology on the road to discover problems as early as possible. Not only can monitoring help engineers identify problems that surface in the field, it can also assist them in their efforts to mobilize resources to resolve problem.


Subject(s)
Air Bags , Engineering , Safety Management , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Uncertainty , Air Bags/adverse effects , Air Bags/ethics , Air Bags/standards , Causality , Engineering/ethics , Engineering/organization & administration , Equipment Design/ethics , Equipment Failure , Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Equipment Safety/ethics , First Aid , Health Education/ethics , Health Education/organization & administration , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Materials Testing/methods , Problem Solving , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/methods , Public Health/ethics , Public Health/methods , Safety Management/ethics , Safety Management/organization & administration , Systems Analysis , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/ethics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , United States/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
18.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 18(2): 167-74, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19968625

ABSTRACT

How safe is safe? The design intent of a medical device is to off er maximum flexibility, and low-cost and fail-safe features. Easily said, these requirements are difficult to deliver in a litigious society where performance standards are uncommon. Medical device manufacturers face challenges as they strive to offer the ultimate in product safety and keep the price affordable for the technology deployed, while making the usability of typically complex products common sense for the operator. As microprocessors are able to assist designers in providing intelligent, multifunctional systems, care must be taken during the design process to balance technological ability with intuitive use. The medical device development process requires rigor that is not often taught to biomedical engineers. Ethical product development requires a process that will be described in this paper using as an example the development of a recent cardiopulmonary perfusion system. However, the same techniques are germane to implantable devices such as cochlear implants. All engineering product development requires trade-off decisions considering how much is too much and how much is too little. Biomedical engineering faculty need to present this ethical dilemma to their students and give them the tools to help decide. However, in the final analysis, the operator of any medical product or installer of any medical device holds the primary responsibility for understanding how to use the system or install the implant in normal use as well as emergent or special situations; the technology is his or her backup in performing the medical professionals primary job.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Engineering/ethics , Biomedical Engineering/instrumentation , Equipment Safety/ethics , Equipment and Supplies/ethics , Equipment Design/ethics , Humans
19.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 17(1): 27-33, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18298394

ABSTRACT

Poor ergonomic design of complex medical equipment can lead to patient morbidity and mortality while still operating correctly. For example, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) machines are used extensively for postoperative pain, and can be programmed to give intravenous morphine every time the patient pushes the demand button. Unfortunately, such devices sometimes have poorly designed user interfaces. As an example, ergonomic flaws in the design of the Abbott Lifecare 4100 PCA Plus II machine have been held to be ultimately responsible for a number of deaths. However, despite being notified of this problem, the manufacturer was unwilling to upgrade the unit to a safer design, claiming that there was no problem with the unit in the first place that could not be handled with proper user training. This case draws attention to two important points, namely, (i) ergonomic studies on medical equipment may be abandoned in favor of early market penetration, and (ii) even when potential improvements are developed, they may be ignored by manufacturers, who may sometimes take a completely amoral approach to business decision making, focusing entirely on what is legal and expedient rather than being driven by any particular moral or ethical principles.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/instrumentation , Equipment Failure , Ergonomics/ethics , Ethics, Business , Health Care Sector/ethics , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/adverse effects , Equipment Design/ethics , Humans
20.
Appl Ergon ; 37(4): 391-9, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16756939

ABSTRACT

The "Revolution in Information Technology" has spawned a series of transformational revolutions in the nature and practice of human factors and ergonomics (HFE). "Generation 1" HFE evolved with a focus on adapting equipment, workplace and tasks to human capabilities and limitations. Generation 2, focused on cognitive systems integration, arose in response to the need to manage automation and dynamic function allocation. Generation 3 is focused on symbiotic technologies that can amplify human physical and cognitive capabilities. Generation 4 is emergent and is focused on biological enhancement of physical or cognitive capabilities. The shift from HFE Generations 1 and 2 to Generations 3 and 4 profoundly alters accepted boundary constraints on the adaptability of humans in complex systems design. Furthermore, it has opened an ethical divide between those that see cognitive and physical enhancement as a great benefit to society and those who perceive this as tampering with the fundamentals of human nature.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Equipment Design/trends , Aging/drug effects , Aging/ethics , Aging/physiology , Cognition/drug effects , Computer Systems/trends , Equipment Design/ethics , Ergonomics/ethics , Ergonomics/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Occupational Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...