Improving emergency department blood product use through nursing education.

BACKGROUND: Rapid access to blood products can be lifesaving for hemorrhaging patients, but placing blood components in easily accessible locations in the emergency department (ED) can lead to wasteful patterns of use. Education can lead to improvements in transfusion behavior, but such changes for the better are often short lived. METHODS: To facilitate the early initiation of balanced resuscitation, an emergency blood refrigerator was placed in our ED in February 2015. Physician education to give blood components in a 1:1 plasma:red blood cell (RBC) unit ratio with the plasma given first was given repeatedly with short-term success. Finally, nurses were trained and empowered to strongly suggest that blood components be given in balanced ratios and that plasma be given first. Plasma:RBC unit ratios were compared in successive years with the chi-square test for trend. RESULTS: A total of 1165 RBC units and 623 plasma units were issued from the ED emergency blood refrigerator over 5 years. Intensive physician education is documented at start, in late 2016 to early 2017, and again in early and late 2018. Ratios of components (U plasma/U RBCs) were 2015, 17%; 2016, 26%; 2017, 61%; 2018, 49%; and 2019, 91% (p < 10-18 chi-square for trend). Higher ratios of plasma use were associated with $40,000+ annual savings. CONCLUSIONS: Giving the ED senior nurses formal education about the need for and a policy to give guidance on massive transfusion protocol (MTP) blood component administration sequence has achieved compliance with our MTP's intention. Increasing plasma use reduces group O RBC use and total blood costs.

En torno a los hemoderivados / About blood products

La transfusión es una necesidad permanente, y la amplitud con la que es utilizada exige que deba garantizarse su calidad y seguridad para evitar, en particular, la transmisión de enfermedades. Ha de ser un tratamiento personalizado. Las funciones de enfermería son de especial importancia así como los cuidados que se requieren. El objetivo del presente estudio es conocer la variabilidad práctica de los profesionales de enfermería del centro hospitalario, sobre la extracción de muestras pretransfusionales y la administración de hemoderivados. Para lo cual se realizó el envío de un cuestionario para su posterior cumplimentación en formato on-line, que garantizaba el total anonimato. Han contestado a la encuesta 180 profesionales. El 74.4% de los enfermeros dice que la transfusión de hemoderivados sólo se puede administrar de forma simultánea con suero fisiológico. Un 56.1% refiere que cada concentrado transfundido de hematíes aumenta la hemoglobina en 1gr/dl. Hemos encontrado un consenso entre las recomendaciones científicas y las contestaciones realizadas por los diferentes profesionales, hecho que se reafirma con el escaso índice de notificaciones adversas que se han registrado en nuestro trabajo. La elaboración e implantación de una guía de actuación en cuanto a la administración de hemoderivados se hace imprescindible (AU)

Transfusion is an ongoing need, and as widely used it requires that quality and safety should be ensured to avoid, in particular, the transmission of diseases. It must be a custom treatment. Nursing roles are particularly important as the care required. The aim of this study is to determine the variability of nursing skills on the extraction of pre-transfusion samples and administration of blood products. Anonymous questionnaires were sent out on-line for subsequent filling and 180 nursing professionals participated. 74.4% of nurses said that blood transfusion can only be administered simultaneously with normal saline, 56.1% reported that each transfused packed red blood cells increases hemoglobin 1 g / dl. We found a consensus among the scientific recommendations and the responses made by different professionals, a fact that is confirmed by the low rate of adverse notifications registered in our study. The development and implementation of policy guidance regarding the administration of blood products is essential (AU)

[Mortality and morbidity conference: A tool for quality and safety of care continuous improvement]. / La Revue de mortalité et morbidité : une méthode d'amélioration continue de la qualité et la sécurité des soins.

OBJECTIVE: The mortality and morbidity conference (MMC) is one of the keystones in the evaluation of quality of care. The objective of this work was to describe a MMC by presenting a case report. CASE REPORT: A 16-year old man suffering from chronic anaemia had to be transfused with two units of red blood cells in an outpatient unit. Although the transfusion went well for the first unit, the patient presented haemolysis during the transfusion of the second unit because the nurse administered the wrong unit. The incident was analysed during a mortality and morbidity conference with the attendance of the hemovigilance local correspondent. Immediate causes of the event were the failure to respect the transfusion procedure: in advance compatibility testing, failure to check the patient and blood component identification just before the transfusion. Factors contributing to the event were the deviation of transfusion practices, poor working conditions of nurses, linked to inadequate staff in relation to the activity. The discussion of the incident led to develop an action plan. DISCUSSION: This case shows the interest for staff members to discuss an adverse event. However, a well-defined methodology for conducting mortality and morbidity conferences is lacking and leads to a wide heterogeneity between teams. Major differences refer to criteria for case selection and quality of participants. This heterogeneity is likely to have an impact of the efficacy of mortality and morbidity conferences regarding the quality and safety of care.

Packed red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: limitations and consequences.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the limitations and consequences of packed red blood cell transfusions, with particular attention to critically ill patients. METHODS: The PubMed database of the National Library of Medicine was searched to find published articles on the indications, clinical utility, limitations, and consequences of red blood cell transfusion, especially in critically ill patients. RESULTS: Several dozen papers were reviewed, including case series, meta-analyses, and retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the physiological effects, clinical efficacy, and consequences and complications of transfusion of packed red blood cells. Most available data indicate that packed red blood cells have a very limited ability to augment oxygen delivery to tissues. In addition, the overwhelming preponderance of data accumulated in the past decade indicate that patients receiving such transfusions have significantly poorer outcomes than do patients not receiving such transfusions, as measured by a variety of parameters including, but not limited to, death and infection. CONCLUSIONS: According to the available data, transfusion of packed red blood cells should be reserved only for situations in which clear physiological indicators for transfusion are present.

Errors in interpreting the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Analysis of reports of incidents, involving ABO incompatibility suggests that the main problem is poor interpretation of the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test (PBCT). We studied sources of error as experienced by nurses as to the blood groups of donor blood and of the recipient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to their seniority in the profession and on the ward, 48 nurses were randomly selected from four transfusion sectors of the University Hospital of Grenoble, France. Each nurse interpreted 24 photos of PBCTs, including some with procedural irregularities, and was asked to assess the compatibility of the blood types of the donor and the recipient. At random, half the nurses were provided with a diagram to facilitate interpretation. RESULTS: The overall frequency of errors was 39.8%. Errors were fewer when the tests were interpreted as compatible (7.3%) or incompatible (6.3%), and when the nurse had been in the profession between 3 and 5 years and in the ward less than 3 years (25.5%), or worked in hematology (34.7%) or anesthesia (36.5%). Use of the diagram limited the number of errors, provided the test was interpretable (22.2%). CONCLUSION: PBCTs cannot be considered a valid safety procedure. We need other, more effective methods to reduce the risk of incompatibility accidents.

Reliability of the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test: association with transfusion practice and training.

BACKGROUND: The utility of a pretransfusion bedside blood compatibility protocol to decrease immunohemolytic accidents has been questioned for years. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The reliability of a standard bedside ABO compatibility test was evaluated with a stratified random sample of 48 nurses who performed agglutination testing by using Bristol cards, interpreted compatibility, and decided whether to transfuse red cells for 12 randomly and blindly selected donor-and-recipient blood sample pairs. An expert judged technical performance and the interpretation of each card. RESULTS: Erroneous decisions occurred in 18.2 percent of 576 tests, including 12 decisions to transfuse incompatible blood. Errors involved both testing protocols and the interpretation of compatibility. Anti-A and anti-B were detected with 92.8-percent sensitivity and 95.9-percent specificity. The expert judged 17.7 percent of tests to be technically inadequate, most often because of the application of excess blood to the card and a lack of rotation of the card. Testing errors (16.1% of tests) were significantly linked to infrequent transfusion activity by the nursing service, inexperience, and insufficient training. Compatibility misinterpretation occurred in 14.6 percent of the tests and was significantly linked to the nurses' infrequent transfusion activity, inexperience, insufficient training, lack of practical experience, and confusion regarding the use of ABO-compatible but not identical blood. CONCLUSION: Bedside pretransfusion compatibility determination should not be considered a reliable supplemental safety procedure in the hands of inexperienced and insufficiently trained operators.