Luteolin enhances drug chemosensitivity by downregulating the FAK/PI3K/AKT pathway in paclitaxel­resistant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Drug resistance is a key factor underlying the failure of tumor chemotherapy. It enhances the stem­like cell properties of cancer cells, tumor metastasis and relapse. Luteolin is a natural flavonoid with strong anti­tumor effects. However, the mechanism(s) by which luteolin protects against paclitaxel (PTX)­resistant cancer cell remains to be elucidated. The inhibitory effect of luteolin on the proliferation of EC1/PTX and EC1 cells was detected by cell counting kit­8 assay. Colony formation and flow cytometry assays were used to assess clonogenic capacity, cell cycle and apoptosis. Wound healing and Transwell invasion tests were used to investigate the effects of luteolin on the migration and invasion of EC1/PTX cells. Western blotting was used to detect the protein levels of EMT­related proteins and stem cell markers after sphere formation. Parental cells and drug­resistant cells were screened by high­throughput sequencing to detect the differential expression of RNA and differential genes. ELISA and western blotting were used to verify the screened PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, key proteins of which were explored by molecular docking. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and TUNEL staining were used to observe tumor xenografts on morphology and apoptosis in nude mice. The present study found that luteolin inhibited tumor resistance (inhibited proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and hindered migration invasion, EMT and stem cell spherification) in vitro in PTX­resistant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells. In addition, luteolin enhanced drug sensitivity and promoted the apoptosis of drug­resistant ESCC cells in combination with PTX. Mechanistically, luteolin may inhibit the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway by binding to the active sites of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Src and AKT. Notably, luteolin lowered the tumorigenic potential of PTX­resistant ESCC cells but did not show significant toxicity in vivo. Luteolin enhanced drug chemosensitivity by downregulating the FAK/PI3K/AKT pathway in PTX­resistant ESCC and could be a promising agent for the treatment of PTX­resistant ESCC cancers.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Clinical efficacy and biomarker exploration.

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and highly malignant type of esophageal cancer with no standard treatment, facing challenges of resistance to conventional therapies. This study presents the cases of one extensive-stage and two limited-stage SCCE patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy. The two limited-stage patients underwent surgery post-treatment and experienced notable and enduring positive responses. This represents the first documented application of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in limited-stage SCCE patients. Additionally, comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis and whole exome sequencing were performed on the case patients. The findings revealed that infiltration of CD8+ T cells and PD-L1 expression in the SCCE tumor were key factors for favorable responses in SCCE patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Clinical Efficacy of Taxol Plus Platinum (TP) Chemotherapy Combined with Delayed Administration of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients with Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have become the first-line standard treatment for locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The evidence also demonstrates improved synergistic effects of chemotherapy when combined with delayed administration of ICIs. In this study, we conducted a retrospective investigation into the treatment efficacy of taxol plus platinum (TP) chemotherapy combined with delayed administration of PD-1 inhibitors for ESCC patients. Patients and Methods: Clinical data of ESCC patients who received PD-1 inhibitors 3-5 days after TP chemotherapy as first-line treatment was retrospectively reviewed between January 2019 and April 2023. Clinical outcomes and treatment safety were analyzed. The potential roles of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) were investigated. Results: A total of 34 locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients received PD-1 inhibitors 3-5 days following TP chemotherapy were included. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 85.3% and 97.1% respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13.2 and 19.1 month respectively. Seven patients received radical surgery, 1 patient achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) and 3 patients achieved major pathologic response (MPR). Among the 27 patients without surgery, the median PFS and OS were 9.7 and 19.1 month respectively. A more favorable prognosis was correlated with NLR less than 3 at the 3rd and 4th cycle of immunochemotherapy. No significant correlations between other parameters (PLR, MLR and PIV) and prognosis were observed. A total of 22 patients developed grade 3-4 toxicity events. Conclusion: The optimized sequence of PD-1 inhibitors administered 3-5 days after TP chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ESCC demonstrated favorable treatment efficacy. Pretreatment NLR of less than 3 at the 3rd and 4th cycle of immunochemotherapy is associated with a better prognosis.

[Clinical significance of combined therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor in perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer or adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction].

The clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) offers novel treatment modality for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AGEJ), with the crucial benefit of providing higher cure rates. These agents have become part of standard treatments in the perioperative setting for selected cases, such as tumor with MSI-H/dMMR, high expression of CPS (≥5) or EBV (+), MSI-H and MSS/TP53+ according to tumor immunohistochemical, genetic testing or molecular characterization. An in-depth understanding of the immune response mechanisms in "cold" and "hot" tumors enables us to better identify ICI beneficiary and further provide a rationale for converting nonresponsive "cold" tumors into responsive "hot" tumors, subsequently allowing nonresponders to benefit from ICI immunotherapy. Several recent clinical trials clearly demonstrated a synergistic and complementary effect of combining ICI with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, as well as combining ICI with anti-HER2 or anti-VEGF/VEGFR and chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination treatment can significantly improve pCR, MRR or ypT0N0, and is expected to improve the prognosis. This article reviews the results of a series of clinical trials in recent years in the field of perioperative application of ICI with other modalities in LAGC/AGEJ, aiming at expanding upon the discussion of current standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for LAGC/AGEJ and exploring the feasibility of new perioperative combined immunotherapy in the future.

[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of preoperative programmed death protein-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in immunotherapy-sensitive patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of a preoperative combination of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor with either oxaliplatin + capecitabine (CapeOx) or oxaliplatin + tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium (SOX) in the treatment of locally advanced immunotherapy-sensitive gastric cancer (LAGC) or adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods: The cohort of this retrospective descriptive case series comprised patients with LAGC or AEG whose cancers had been determined to be immunotherapy- sensitive by endoscopic biopsy before treatment in the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Unit III, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute from 1 August 1 2021 to 31 January 2024. Patients with any one of the following three characteristics were immunotherapy-sensitive: (i) PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥5; (ii) microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) / mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR); or (iii) Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA (EBER) positivity. All study patients received PD-1 inhibitors combined with CapeOx or SOX as a neoadjuvant or conversion treatment strategy before surgery. Patients with immune system diseases, distant metastases, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity were excluded. Factors analyzed included pathological complete response, clinical complete response, major pathological response, R0 resection rate, surgical conversion rate, and safety of the treatment, including immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and surgical complications. Results: The study cohort comprised 39 patients (28 men and 11 women) of median age 62 (range 44-79) years. After the above-described preoperative treatment, radical resection of the 14 tumors that were initially considered unresectable was achieved (surgical conversion rate: 14/14). Twenty-three of the remaining 25 patients underwent radical resection. The last two patients achieved clinical complete responses and opted for a "non-surgical strategy" (watch and wait). Overall, 37 patients (94.9%) underwent radical resection, with an R0 resection rate of 100% (37/37), pathological complete response rate of 48.6% (18/37), and major pathological response rate of 62.2% (23/37). Of the 24 patients with CPS ≥ 5 (non-MSI-H/dMMR and non-EBER positive), 11 achieved pathological complete responses and one with CPS=95 achieved a clinical complete response. Of the eight patients with MSI-H/dMMR, six achieved pathological complete responses and one a clinical complete response. Of the seven patients with EBER positivity, one achieved a pathological complete response. After excluding patients with major pathological complete responses, there was a statistically significant difference in CPS scores between preoperative biopsy specimens and postoperative surgical specimens in 13 patients (7.769±5.570 vs. 15.538±16.870, t=2.287, P=0.041). All patients tolerated preoperative immunotherapy well; nine patients (9/39, 23.1%) had Grade I-II irAEs. There were no Grade III-IV irAEs. The five patients with pyloric obstruction before treatment tolerated normal diets after treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications among all patients who underwent surgery was 18.9% (7/37), including one case of Grade IIIA anastomotic leakage, one of Grade IIIA intestinal obstruction, one of Grade II abdominal hemorrhage, two of Grade II abdominal infection, one of Grade I intestinal obstruction. Additionally, one patient developed COVID-19 postoperatively. All patients recovered with symptomatic treatment. Conclusion: We found that preoperative treatment of patients with LAGC or AEG of one of three types (CPS≥5, dMMR+MSI-H, and EBER positivity) with a PD-1 inhibitor combined with CapeOx or SOX chemotherapy achieved promising effectiveness and safety, with high surgical conversion, R0 resection, and complete response rates.

Prognostic relevance of prognostic nutritional indices in gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) has become an important predictive tool for assessing patients' nutritional status and immune competence. It is widely used in prognostic evaluations for various cancer patients. However, the prognostic relevance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients (GC/GEJC) undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of PNI in this specific patient cohort. Methods: We conducted a thorough literature search, covering prominent databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SpringerLink, and the Cochrane Library. The search spanned from the inception of these databases up to December 5, 2023. Employing the 95% confidence interval and Hazard Ratio (HR), the study systematically evaluated the relationship between PNI and key prognostic indicators, including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GC/GEJC patients undergoing ICI treatment. Results: Eight studies comprising 813 eligible patients were selected. With 7 studies consistently demonstrating superior Overall Survival (OS) in the high-Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) group compared to their low-PNI counterparts (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, P<0.001). Furthermore, the results derived from 6 studies pointed out that the significant correlation between he low-PNI and poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the results. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of three studies examining the correlation between PNI and objective response rate/disease control rate (ORR/DCR) and found that the ORR/DCR was significantly superior in the high PNI group (ORR: RR: 1.24, P=0.002; DCR: RR: 1.43, P=0.008). Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that the low-PNI in GC/GEJC patients undergoing ICI treatment is significantly linked to worse OS and PFS. Therefore, PNI can serve as a prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes in patients with GC receiving ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to assess the reliability of these findings. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202450133.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in older patients (PARADISE-1): a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: In older patients, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is difficult to treat using standard therapies, including surgery and cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Paclitaxel (PTX) has radiosensitizing activity. We conducted a phase I trial of PTX combined with radiotherapy to establish a standard therapy for locally advanced ESCC in older patients. METHODS: Enrollment was conducted at six centers in Japan from April 2016 to September 2019. The participants were aged ≥ 70 years, had locally advanced ESCC, and were intolerant to surgery or unwilling. A fixed 60-Gy radiation dose was administered in 30 fractions. PTX dosing levels started at 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. Depending on the number of DLTs, the dose was set to be increased by 10 mg/m2 or switched to biweekly. A geriatric assessment was performed before treatment using the Geriatric-8 screening tool. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: We enrolled 24 patients (6 per group); DLT was observed in one (grade 4 hypokalemia), one (grade 3 aspiration), two (grade 3 radiodermatitis, grade 3 esophageal hemorrhage), and two (grade 3 anorexia, grade 5 pneumonitis) patients in the weekly PTX 30, 40, 50, and 60 mg/m2 groups, respectively. All adverse events, except death in the 60 mg/m2 group, showed reversible improvement, and the safety profile was considered acceptable. The 2-year survival and complete response rates were 40.0% and 54.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between favorable and unfavorable Geriatric-8 scores. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended PTX dose with concomitant radiation was determined to be 50 mg/m2 weekly. Phase II trials at this dose are underway.

Cell-SELEX and application research of a DNA aptamer against esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cell line TE-1.

Esophageal cancer is a common cancer with high morbidity and mortality that severely threatens the safety and quality of human life. The strong metastatic nature of esophageal cancer enables it to metastasize more quickly and covertly, making it difficult for current diagnostic and treatment methods to achieve efficient early screening, as well as timely and effective treatment. As a promising solution, nucleic acid aptamers, a kind of special single-stranded DNA or RNA oligonucleotide selected by the Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX) technology, can specifically bind with different molecular targets. In this paper, random DNA single-stranded oligonucleotides were used as the initial library. Using TE-1 cells and HEEC cells as targets, specific binding sequences were selected by 15 rounds of the cell-SELEX method, and the aptamer sequence that binds to TE-1 cells with the most specificity was obtained and named Te4. The Te4 aptamer was further validated for binding specificity, binding affinity, type of target, in vitro cytotoxicity when conjugated with DOX(Te4-DOX), and in vivo distribution. Results of in vitro validation showed that Te4 has outstanding binding specificity with a Kd value of 51.16 ± 5.52 nM, and the target type of Te4 was preliminarily identified as a membrane protein. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity experiment showed that Te4-DOX has specific cytotoxicity towards cultured TE-1 cells. Finally, the results of the in vivo distribution experiment showed that the Te4 aptamer is able to specifically target tumor regions in nude mice, showing great potential to be applied in future diagnosis and targeted therapy of esophageal cancer.

Spatial intra-tumour heterogeneity and treatment-induced genomic evolution in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for prognosis and therapy.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is a highly heterogeneous cancer with poor survival. Standard curative treatment is chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy. Genomic heterogeneity is a feature of OAC and has been linked to treatment resistance. METHODS: Whole-genome sequencing data from 59 treatment-naïve and 18 post-treatment samples from 29 OAC patients was analysed. Twenty-seven of these were enrolled in the DOCTOR trial, sponsored by the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Two biopsies from each treatment-naïve tumour were assessed to define 'shared' (between both samples) and 'private' (present in one sample) mutations. RESULTS: Mutational signatures SBS2/13 (APOBEC) and SBS3 (BRCA) were almost exclusively detected in private mutation populations of treatment-naïve tumours. Patients presenting these signatures had significantly worse disease specific survival. Furthermore, mutational signatures associated with platinum-based chemotherapy treatment as well as high platinum enrichment scores were only detected in post-treatment samples. Additionally, clones with high putative neoantigen binding scores were detected in some treatment-naïve samples suggesting immunoediting of clones. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the high intra-tumour heterogeneity in OAC, as well as indicators for treatment-induced changes during tumour evolution. Intra-tumour heterogeneity remains a problem for successful treatment strategies in OAC.

Utilising systematic reviews to assess potential overtreatment and claim for better evidence-based research: an analysis of anticancer drugs versus supportive care in advanced esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Highlighting the identified gaps in evidence-based research concerning advanced esophageal cancer (EC) treatment and care, this review evaluates the efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs compared to supportive care for advanced EC patients, aiming to assess the appropriateness of usual treatments and identify the gaps that need to be filled with primary research. METHODS: We searched (May 2022) MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Epistemonikos, and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological/targeted therapy) with supportive care in advanced EC. The results were summarised using GRADE summary of finding tables. RESULTS: We included 15 RCTs. Most studies did not have a special focus on EC, did not detail the treatment lines in all patients, and did not evaluate all outcomes. Anticancer drugs may result in a slight increase in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86; MD 0.83 months) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.49, 0.64, MD 0.68 months), but also may increase toxicity (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13, 1.65), without a significant improvement in quality of life. The certainty of evidence was low or very low due to indirectness of results and lack of specific focus on EC in some studies. CONCLUSION: RCTs on advanced EC lack specificity, detailed treatment line information, and evaluation of all relevant outcomes. Moreover, when they find any benefit, this is negligible. Therefore, the certainty to justify anticancer drug treatments instead of supportive care in advanced EC is low or very low, and this information should be actively shared with affected patients. More and better RCTs should be conducted to assess whether any old or new proposed treatment for advanced EC patients provides a better balance of benefits and harms than the supportive care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered in OSF ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7CHX6 ) on 2022-03-29.

Cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma from a Chinese perspective.

BACKGROUND: This work was designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of front-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (TIS+Chemo) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) with positive expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 10-year partitioned survival model was undertaken utilizing clinical data from RATIONALE 305. Costs and utilities were both discounted at an annual rate of 5%. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set as $18,625/QALY. Only direct medical costs were considered. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost and effectiveness associated with TIS+Chemo vs Chemo was 7,361 and 0.38 QALYs, respectively, leading to an ICER of 19,371/QALY. At the WTP threshold of $18,625/QALY, the TIS+Chemo was not a cost-effective first-line treatment option. The model outcomes were robust. CONCLUSIONS: TIS+Chemo did not provide a cost-effective approach for PD-L1 positive advanced GC/GEJC in China setting. However, TIS+Chemo might be cost-effective in provinces with higher WTP threshold. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: RATIONALE 305, www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier is NCT03777657.

Interpretable machine learning for predicting the response duration to Sintilimab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Background: Sintilimab plus chemotherapy has proven effective as a combination immunotherapy for patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). A multi-center study conducted in China revealed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.1 months. However, the prediction of response duration to this immunotherapy has not been thoroughly investigated. Additionally, the potential of baseline laboratory features in predicting PFS remains largely unexplored. Therefore, we developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework, iPFS-SC, aimed at predicting PFS using baseline (pre-treatment) laboratory features and providing interpretations of the predictions. Materials and methods: A cohort of 146 patients with advanced GC/GEJC, along with their baseline laboratory features, was included in the iPFS-SC framework. Through a forward feature selection process, predictive baseline features were identified, and four ML algorithms were developed to categorize PFS duration based on a threshold of 7.1 months. Furthermore, we employed explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methodologies to elucidate the relationship between features and model predictions. Results: The findings demonstrated that LightGBM achieved an accuracy of 0.70 in predicting PFS for advanced GC/GEJC patients. Furthermore, an F1-score of 0.77 was attained for identifying patients with PFS durations shorter than 7.1 months. Through the feature selection process, we identified 11 predictive features. Additionally, our framework facilitated the discovery of relationships between laboratory features and PFS. Conclusion: A ML-based framework was developed to predict Sintilimab plus chemotherapy response duration with high accuracy. The suggested predictive features are easily accessible through routine laboratory tests. Furthermore, XAI techniques offer comprehensive explanations, both at the global and individual level, regarding PFS predictions. This framework enables patients to better understand their treatment plans, while clinicians can customize therapeutic approaches based on the explanations provided by the model.

Progress in second-line antibody therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor. Although cytotoxic drugs have been widely used in advanced ESCC, several antibody agents have recently been reported to be effective. AREAS COVERED: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are anti-PD-1 antibodies that improve immunosuppression by binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1), leading to an antitumor effect. Randomized phase III trials have found these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to be effective as second-line treatment. ATTRACTION-3, which compared nivolumab monotherapy with taxane monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced ESCC, reported prolonged overall survival in the nivolumab group. KEYNOTE-181 found that overall survival was longer in patients with PD-L1-positive ESCC who received second-line treatment with pembrolizumab than in those who received chemotherapy. Sym004 and amivantamab are antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of other tumors in recent phase I studies. Furthermore, clinical trials on antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin and DS-7300 for solid tumors are currently ongoing. EXPERT OPINION: The standard first-line treatments for patients with advanced ESCC contain ICIs. Therefore, drugs with different mechanisms of action that can overcome resistance to ICIs are needed as second-line or later-line treatments to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Clinical efficacy and identification of factors confer resistance to afatinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in EGFR-overexpressing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is reportedly overexpressed in most esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, but anti-EGFR treatments offer limited survival benefits. Our preclinical data showed the promising antitumor activity of afatinib in EGFR-overexpressing ESCC. This proof-of-concept, phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of afatinib in pretreated metastatic ESCC patients (n = 41) with EGFR overexpression (NCT03940976). The study met its primary endpoint, with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 39% in 38 efficacy-evaluable patients and a median overall survival of 7.8 months, with a manageable toxicity profile. Transcriptome analysis of pretreatment tumors revealed that neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2) was negatively associated with afatinib sensitivity and might serve as a predictive biomarker, irrespective of EGFR expression. Notably, knocking down or inhibiting NTRK2 sensitized ESCC cells to afatinib treatment. Our study provides novel findings on the molecular factors underlying afatinib resistance and indicates that afatinib has the potential to become an important treatment for metastatic ESCC patients.

A phase 2 study of spartalizumab (PDR001) among patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (KCSG HN18-17, K-MASTER project 12).

Spartalizumab (PDR001) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of spartalizumab in patients with refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with histologically confirmed ESCC who experienced disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy received 300 mg of intravenous spartalizumab every three weeks until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Adverse events were closely monitored throughout the study. From March 2020 through April 2021, 44 patients with ESCC were enrolled. Of the 44 patients, the objective response rate was 20.5% (95% confidence interval: 8.5-32.4). With a median follow-up of 10.9 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.2 months and 11.2 months, respectively. In addition, the median duration of response was 24.7 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was grade 3 dysphagia (eight [18%] patients). Biomarker analyses explored programmed cell death ligand 1 and CD20 as potential predictive markers for PD-1 blockade. Spartalizumab showed promising activity with a manageable safety profile, indicating its potential as a new treatment option for patients with refractory ESCC. Trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03785496.

IQGAP1 overexpression attenuates chemosensitivity through YAP-mediated ferroptosis inhibition in esophageal squamous cell cancer cells.

Chemoresistance is one of the major hindrances to many cancer therapies, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Ferroptosis, a new programmed cell death, plays an essential role in chemoresistance. IQ-domain GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1) is a scaffold protein and functions as an oncogene in various human malignancies. However, the underlying effect and molecular mechanisms of IQGAP1 on paclitaxel (PTX) resistance and ferroptosis in ESCC remain to be elucidated. In this study, we found that IQGAP1 was highly expressed in ESCC tissues and could as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and predicting the prognosis of ESCC. Functional studies revealed that IQGAP1 overexpression reduced the sensitivity of ESCC cells to PTX by enhancing ESCC cell viability and proliferation and inhibiting cell death, and protected ESCC cells from ferroptosis, whereas IQGAP1 knockdown exhibited contrary effects. Importantly, reductions of chemosensitivity and ferroptosis caused by IQGAP1 overexpression were reversed with ferroptosis inducer RSL3, while the increases of chemosensitivity and ferroptosis caused by IQGAP1 knockdown were reversed with ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) in ESCC cells, indicating that IQGAP1 played a key role in resistance to PTX through regulating ferroptosis. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that IQGAP1 overexpression upregulated the expression of Yes-associated protein (YAP), the central mediator of the Hippo pathway. YAP inhibitor Verteporfin (VP) could reverse the effects of IQGAP1 overexpression on ESCC chemoresistance and ferroptosis. Taken together, our findings suggest that IQGAP1 promotes chemoresistance by blocking ferroptosis through targeting YAP. IQGAP1 may be a novel therapeutic target for overcoming chemoresistance in ESCC.

Adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for stage III gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection (ATTRACTION-5): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In Asia, adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection is standard treatment for people with pathological stage III gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy administered in this setting. METHODS: ATTRACTION-5 was a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 96 hospitals in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and China. Eligible patients were aged between 20 years and 80 years with histologically confirmed pathological stage IIIA-C gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1 and available tumour tissue for PD-L1 expression analysis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either nivolumab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy via an interactive web-response system with block sizes of four. Investigational treatment, either nivolumab 360 mg or placebo, was administered intravenously for 30 min once every 3 weeks. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered as either tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (S-1) at an initial dose of 40 mg/m2 per dose orally twice per day for 28 consecutive days, followed by 14 days off per cycle, or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin consisting of an initial dose of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 for 2 h every 21 days and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 per dose orally twice per day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days off treatment. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival by central assessment. The intention-to-treat population, consisting of all randomly assigned patients, was used for analysis of efficacy endpoints. The safety population, defined as patients who received at least one dose of trial drug, was used for analysis of safety endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03006705) and is closed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 1, 2017, and Aug 15, 2019, 755 patients were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy (n=377) or adjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy (n=378). 267 (71%) of 377 patients in the nivolumab group and 263 (70%) of 378 patients in the placebo group were male; 110 (29%) of 377 patients in the nivolumab group and 115 (31%) of 378 patients in the placebo group were female. 745 patients received assigned treatment (371 in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group; 374 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group), which was the safety population. Median time from first dose to data cutoff was 49·1 months (IQR 43·1-56·7). 3-year relapse-free survival was 68·4% (95% CI 63·0-73·2) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 65·3% (59·9-70·2) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group; the hazard ratio for relapse-free survival was 0·90 (95·72% CI 0·69-1·18; p=0·44). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 366 (99%) of 371 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 364 (98%) of 374 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (34 [9%] of 371 patients) than the placebo plus chemotherapy group (13 [4%] of 374 patients). The most common treatment-related adverse events were decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhoea, neutrophil count decreased, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. INTERPRETATION: The results of this trial do not support the addition of nivolumab to postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with untreated, locally advanced, resectable gastric or GEJ cancer. FUNDING: Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol Myers Squibb.

Targeting TRIM40 signaling reduces esophagus cancer development: A mechanism involving in protection of oroxylin A.

Oroxylin A (OA), a naturally active O-methylated flavone derived from Scutellaria baicalensis, is regarded as a potential drug with strong anticancer effects. Unfortunately, our understanding of the antineoplastic mechanism of oral exposure to such flavonoids is inadequate. Growing evidence has confirmed the important role of OA in the regulation of oxidative stress- and inflammatory-response-induced tissue injury. However, it remains unknown whether OA is capable of mitigating esophagus cancer (EC) progression and its potential molecular mechanism. Furthermore, the tripartite motif containing 40 (TRIM40) is a ubiquitin ligase that mediates the immune response. The potential molecular function of TRIM40 in regulating EC is largely unknown. We confirmed that OA-triggered oxidative stress markedly upregulates TRIM40. During the OA challenge, increased TRIM40 reduced oxidative stress and promoted the ER stress response. Inversely, deletion of TRIM40 facilitated oxidative stress and blocked cancer cell growth in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, in response to OA treatment, TRIM40 directly interacts with Keap1 and promotes ubiquitin-proteasome degradation, thus leading to the promotion of Nrf2 nuclear translocation and its downstream cascade activation, which increases antioxidant defense and cell survival. TRIM40 expression was positively correlated with Nrf2 expression and negatively associated with Keap1 expression in EC xenografts and human specimens. In addition, high TRIM40 expression correlates with poor patient survival in EC. The findings suggested that oral exposure to OA significantly mitigates EC development by targeting TRIM40 activity. These findings further elucidated the potential role of TRIM40 in EC progression by mediating Keap1 degradation, which could be considered a therapeutic target for the treatment of such a disease.

Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment, disease progression remains common in the majority of patients and subsequent therapeutic options for this population are limited. ICI rechallenge has been validated favorably in terms of efficacy and safety in many cancer types, while data in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are still lacking. METHODS: Clinical and pathological characteristics of advanced ESCC patients who received ICI rechallenge were collected retrospectively. The primary outcomes of interest were the disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment-related adverse events were also recorded. We categorized patients into primary resistance and secondary resistance based on a 6-month disease control duration following the initial immunotherapy and further conducted exploratory analyses. RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study spanning January 2018 and October 2023, at Peking University Cancer Hospital, scrutinized 45 advanced ESCC patients undergoing two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1 and ICI-2). The initial therapeutic approach involved combining ICIs with chemotherapy, and the ICI rechallenge primarily comprised ICIs and angiogenesis inhibitors. The median PFS for ICI-1 was 6.7 months with a disease control rate of 88.9 %. Following the ICI rechallenge, the median PFS and disease control rate remained at 3.2 months and 73.3 %, respectively. It is noteworthy that patients with secondary resistance to ICI-1 exhibited a higher 6-month PFS rate (29.6 % v.s. 11.1 %) in the ICI-2 stage. Any grade of treatment-related adverse events was observed in 29 (64.4 %) and 18 (40.0 %) patients at ICI-1 and ICI-2. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events in grades 3-4 was 9.1 % at ICI-1 and 9.1 % at ICI-2. CONCLUSION: ICI rechallenge may offer a potential survival benefit and a favorable safety profile for patients with ESCC who have progressed after initial immunotherapy. Patients exhibiting acquired resistance during initial immunotherapy are more likely to achieve prolonged disease control after undergoing rechallenge therapy. Prospective studies are required to further explore the optimal combined therapy and select targeted population.

Clinical outcomes and biomarker exploration of first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low PD-L1-expressing of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of first-line programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma are controversial. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had undergone first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy between October 2017 and May 2022. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). SPSS software V27.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of 345 enrolled patients, 290 had measurable lesions. The overall ORR was 59.3%. PD-L1 status was available in 171 patients, and 67.8% of them were considered as low PD-L1 expression level (combined positive score (CPS) < 5). Patients with PD-L1 CPS < 5 showed a lower response rate (51.1% vs 70.8%, P = 0.024) and a worse PFS (P = 0.009) compared to those with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. In the PD-L1 low-expression cohort, patients with non-diffuse type, GEJ cancer, synchronous metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, non-peritoneal metastasis, and HER2 positive were significantly associated with higher response rates to PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05). The presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.028) and diffuse type (P = 0.046) were identified as independent predictors of poor PFS in multivariate analysis of the PD-L1 CPS < 5 subgroup. When evaluated for correlation with overall survival (OS) in the PD-L1 low-expression subgroup, peritoneal metastasis was found to be the only independent prognostic factor of an increased risk of death (hazard ratio: 2.31, 95% CI 1.09-4.90; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 is significantly associated with improved response and extended PFS in G/GEJ cancer patients treated with a combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. Specific subgroups within the low PD-L1-expressing population, such as those with non-diffuse-type tumors and without peritoneal metastases, may also benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.