Continuation of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: comparison of cyclic versus continuous combined schedules.

Discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is much more common than what is reported in randomized, double-blind clinical trials. Our purpose in this retrospective study, using a prescription database, was to compare the continuation rate among women who took cyclic combination therapy adding progesterone to estrogen (CYC-PERT) or continuous combined estrogen progestin therapy (CC-PERT). The study subjects were 1,532 women, ≥45 years old, who initially filled index prescriptions for 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens. They were divided into two groups (CYC-PERT = 644, CC-PERT = 888) on the basis of coprescribed medroxyprogesterone. We found that for all women initiating therapy, 35-40% did not return for a refill and 76-81% stopped therapy within 3 years. Those prescribed CC-PERT initially were more likely to stop than those prescribed CYC-PERT (rate ratio [RR] = 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.35). Adjustments for age, year of starting medication, cost of medication, and prescriber specialty did not affect the difference in discontinuation between the two regimens (RR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04-1.34). We conclude that the likelihood of women continuing HRT beyond 3 years of initiation is low. Furthermore, compared with CYC-PERT users, those receiving CC-PERT have a slightly higher probability of discontinuation. Efforts should be made to understand why three quarters of women beginning HRT will stop it long before it can provide major long-term benefit.

Bazedoxifene for HRT?

Duavive (Pfizer) is a modified-release formulation of conjugated oestrogens plus bazedoxifene acetate (a selective oestrogen receptor modulator). It is licensed for treatment of oestrogen deficiency symptoms in postmenopausal women with a uterus for whom treatment with progestogen-containing therapy is not appropriate.1,2 It was licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2014 and launched in the UK in July 2016.1,3 Here, we review the evidence on efficacy and safety of conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene and consider its place in the management of symptoms associated with the menopause.

[Sexual hormone and traditional Chinese patent medicine for early postmenopausal women: effect on quality of life and cost-utility analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of Premarin and Kuntai capsule (a traditional Chinese patent medicine) on the quality of life (QOL) and their cost-utility in early postmenopausal women. METHODS: Fifty-seven women with menopausal syndrome in the early postmenopausal stage were randomly allocated into Premarin group (0.3 mg/day and 0.6 mg/day alternately, n=29) and Kuntai group (4 g/day, n=28). The therapies lasted for one year and the patients were followed up every 3 months. The QOL of the patients was evaluated and the utility scores were obtained from rating scale to conduct a cost-utility analysis (CUA). RESULTS: At each follow-up examination, no significant difference was found in the QOL between the two groups (P>0.05). The QOL obviously increased after the 1-year-long therapy in both the groups, and Kuntai required longer treatment time than Premarin to take effect. The cost-utility ratio of Premarin and Kuntai were 13581.45 yuan/QALY (quality adjusted life year) and 25105.12 yuan/QALY, respectively. Both incremental cost analysis and sensitivity analysis showed that Kuntai was more costly than Premarin. The result of per-protocol analysis was consistent with that of intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSION: At early stage of menopause, the QOL of women with menopausal syndrome can be significantly improved by low-dose Premarin and Kuntai capsule, but the latter is more costly.

Economic impact of Tibolone compared with Continuous-Combined Hormone Replacement Therapy in the management of climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Deciding whether to treat postmenopausal women suffering from climacteric symptoms with Continuous Combined Hormone Replacement Therapy (CCHRT) has become increasingly difficult after the release of the Women's Health Initiative results. As a result, development of alternatives to CCHRT is required. Tibolone, which is a synthetic steroid that has estrogenic, progestogenic and androgenic properties, is reported to be a promising alternative. It has been used in Europe, in the same indication as CCHRT, for approximately 20 years but is not yet available in Canada. OBJECTIVE: We carried out a cost-utility analysis comparing a 3-year-treatment course with Tibolone 2.5mg and conjugated equine estrogens (CEE)/medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (0.625 mg/2.5 mg) in the management of postmenopausal women with climacteric symptoms. METHODS: A Markov model, considering persistence, vaginal bleeding and climacteric symptoms, was elaborated to compare the different options in terms of cost and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), according to a public third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: Compared with CEE/MPA, Tibolone led to an increase in cost (dollars 485 for Tibolone versus dollars 232 for CEE/MPA) and a slight increase in QALYs (2.08 for Tibolone versus 2.05 for CEE/MPA). Consequently, the incremental cost per QALY gained ratio was dollars 9198. CONCLUSION: According to the results, Tibolone seems to be a cost-effective alternative to CEE/MPA. However, those results should be interpreted with caution insofar as the difference in terms of QALY is clinically difficult to value and taking into account the limited data on Tibolone's long-term innocuity.

Promotion and prescribing of hormone therapy after report of harm by the Women's Health Initiative.

CONTEXT: Little is known about how the pharmaceutical industry responds to evidence of harm associated with its products, such as the publication in July 2002 of the Women's Health Initiative Estrogen Plus Progestin Trial (WHI E+P) report demonstrating that standard-dose Prempro produced significant harm and lacked net benefits. OBJECTIVE: To examine pharmaceutical industry response to the WHI E+P results by analyzing promotional expenditures for hormone therapy before and after July 2002. DESIGN AND SETTING: Nationally representative and prospectively collected longitudinal data (January 2001 through December 2003) on prescribing and promotion of hormone therapies were obtained from IMS Health and Consumer Media Reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in quarterly prescriptions for hormone therapy and expenditures on 5 modes of drug promotion: samples, office-based detailing, hospital-based promotion, journal advertisements, and direct-to-consumer advertising. RESULTS: Prior to the WHI E+P report, prescribing rates and promotional spending for hormone therapy were stable. In the quarter before the WHI E+P report (April-June 2002), 22.4 million prescriptions for hormone therapy were dispensed and 71 million dollars was spent on promotion (in annual terms, 350 dollars per year per US physician). Within 9 months of the report's publication (quarter 1 of 2003), there was a 32% decrease in hormone therapy prescriptions, and a nadir had been reached for promotional spending (37% decrease compared with pre-WHI E+P levels). Spending decreased for all promotional activities and most hormone therapies. Overall, the greatest declines were for samples (36% decrease as of quarter 1 of 2003) and direct-to-consumer advertising (100% decrease). The greatest declines in promotion occurred for standard-dose Prempro (61% decrease as of quarter 1 of 2003), the agent implicated by the WHI E+P report. More recently, promotional efforts have increased, particularly for lower-dose Prempro, a resurgence associated with modestly increased prescriptions for this newer agent. CONCLUSIONS: Concordant with its widespread use, hormone therapy was among the most heavily promoted medications prior to the WHI E+P report. Following reporting of the evidence of harm from this trial, there was a substantial decline in promotional spending for hormone therapy, particularly for the agents most directly implicated in the trial. Interrelated with the impact of the trial results themselves and the ensuing media coverage, reduced promotion may have contributed to a substantial decline in hormone therapy prescriptions.

A cost-effectiveness evaluation of two continuous-combined hormone therapies for the management of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: After the release of the results of the Women's Health Initiative, an emerging consensus suggests that continuous-combined hormone therapy (CCHT) should be limited to short-term management of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms. This, in turn, raises the important question of the economic value, if any, of short-term CCHT for this indication. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing a 1-year treatment course with 1 mg of norethindrone acetate/5 microg of ethinyl estradiol (1/5 NA/EE) or 0.625 mg/day of conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone (0.625/2.5 CEE/MPA) compared with no therapy for the management of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms. DESIGN: A literature-based Markov model was developed to compare these three options' cost and quality-of-life (QOL) benefits. The impact of therapy on vasomotor symptoms and breakthrough bleeding/spotting on the direct costs of care and QOL were considered. RESULTS: Compared with no therapy, CCHTs resulted in net increases in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained (0.110 for 1/5 NA/NE v 0.104 for 0.625/2.5 CEE/MPA). Net costs (v no therapy) were $167 lower for 1/5 NA/NE compared with 0.625/2.5 CEE/MPA. Cost per QALY gained (compared with no therapy) were $6,200 and $8,200, respectively. Cost-effectiveness was most favorable for individuals with more severe symptoms who were less bothered by breakthrough bleeding/spotting. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term course of CCHT for the sole purpose of managing moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms is cost-effective. However, 1/5 NA/NE seemed to be more cost-effective than 0.625/2.5 CEE/MPA. These findings can be used to further refine the role of CCHT and to improve formulary decisions.

[Equine estrogens vs. esterified estrogens in the climacteric and menopause. The controversy arrives in Mexico]. / Estrógenos equinos vs. estrógenos esterificados en el climaterio y la menopausia. La controversia llega a México.

It exists controversies about if the effects and benefits of the esterified estrogens could be similar to those informed for equines, because its chemical composition and bioavailability are different. Esterified estrogens has not delta 8,9 dehydroestrone, and its absorption and level of maximum plasmatic concentrations are reached very fast. In United States of America and another countries, esterified estrogens has been marketed and using for treatment of climacteric syndrome and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, based on the pharmacopoiea of that country, but the Food and Drug administration (FDA) has not yet authorized up today, a generic version of conjugated estrogens. In Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) and another institutions of health sector in Mexico, starting in year 2000, it has been used esterified estrogens for medical treatment of climacteric and menopausal conditions. For this reason, in this paper we revised the most recent information about pharmacology, chemical composition, clinical use and costs of the conjugated estrogens with the purpose to guide the decisions to purchase this kind of drugs in Mexican heath institutions.

Evaluation of a formulary switch from conjugated to esterified estrogens in a managed care setting.

BACKGROUND: Formulary switches between agents in the same therapeutic class have become commonplace in the managed care setting as a strategy to reduce costs. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of a formulary switch from conjugated to esterified estrogen tablets at the Fallon Community Health Plan, a mixed-model health maintenance organization. DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted with the use of the automated database of the health plan. SUBJECTS: Study subjects were members of the health plan during the period from May 1, 1995, to December 31, 1997, who were dispensed > or =1 estrogen replacement product. From this population, a cohort of users of conjugated estrogens during the period from May 1, 1995, to October 31, 1995, was selected. MEASURES: The cumulative incidence of switching from conjugated to esterified estrogen tablets and subsequent discontinuations of esterified estrogens was evaluated. The frequencies of ambulatory encounters during the 6 months before and after a switch or discontinuation were compared. RESULTS: During the period after promotion of the formulary switch, 2,149 of 2,984 patients (72%) originally dispensed conjugated estrogen tablets switched to esterified estrogen tablets. Among those patients switching to esterified estrogens, an excess of 20 office visits per 100 patients was noted in the postswitch period (P = 0.005). The risk of switching back to conjugated estrogen tablets was 15% by 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that plan efforts were successful in switching most users of conjugated estrogens to esterified estrogens. The switch was associated with an increase in utilization of health care services.

Therapeutic interchange of conjugated and esterified estrogens in a managed care organization.

A program designed to curb increases in drug costs in an HMO by substituting esterified for conjugated estrogens was developed and studied. Patients were voluntarily switched from conjugated to esterified estrogens at an HMO in Washington State. Women were informed about the conversion through newsletters and during clinic and pharmacy visits and received physician and pharmacist counseling. Cost savings were estimated, and patient acceptance was evaluated by interviewing women in four groups, including women who were switched from conjugated to esterified estrogens and then switched back (C-E-C group), women who were not switched (C-C group), and women who were switched to esterified estrogens and not switched back (C-E group). During the first six months, 14,601 (89.2%) of 16,364 women taking conjugated estrogens were switched to esterified estrogens; of these, 13,654 (93.5%) continued taking esterified estrogens for at least six months. The HMO avoided $653,119 of an expected $750,000 cost increase for oral estrogen therapy during the first year of the program. A total of 754 women were interviewed; 65.8% in the C-E-C group and 78.4% in the C-E group reported being satisfied with the information they received. The conversion experience was rated as positive by 28.3% of women in the C-E-C group and 41.5% of women in the C-E group, negative by 25.1%, and 8.9%, and neutral by 46.6% and 49.6%. An HMO avoided a large increase in drug costs by substituting esterified for conjugated estrogens; only 6.5% of patients were switched back to conjugated estrogens at their physicians' or their own request; most patients thought the conversion was a neutral or positive experience.

Acceptability of a substitution of estrogen replacement therapy to women enrolled in a health maintenance organization.

We evaluated the acceptability of a systematic estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) substitution program in a large U.S. health maintenance organization (HMO). Prescriptions for 14,601 enrollees were converted from Premarin tablets (PR) to Estratab tablets (ES). At the end of 6 months, 93.5% of the women continued to use ES, and 6.5% reverted to use of PR. We report the results of a telephone survey that included women randomly selected from three groups who participated in the substitution program. The groups were women whose prescriptions were converted from PR to ES (n = 253), women whose prescriptions were converted from PR to ES and back to PR (n = 250), and women who continued to use PR without converting to ES (n = 251). Two thirds of women who did not revert to use of PR were still using ES 3 years after conversion of their prescriptions. Women whose prescriptions were converted but who returned to use of PR cited both return of menopausal symptoms and development of new symptoms as reasons. Women who continued to use ES did not report return of menopausal symptoms after the conversion. Our evidence supports the conclusion that the substitution of Estratab tablets for Premarin tablets among users of ERT was well tolerated and acceptable to most affected women in this HMO setting.

Should a doctor prescribe hormone replacement therapy which has been manufactured from mare's urine?

Many clinicians are experiencing consumer resistance to the prescription of equine HRT (that is hormone replacement therapy which has been manufactured from mare's urine). In this paper I consider the ethical implications of prescribing these preparations. I decide that patients should have a right to refuse such treatment but also ask whether a prescribing doctor should choose one preparation over another on moral grounds. I determine that there is prima facie evidence to suggest that mares may suffer and that prescription of equine HRT (instead of synthetic oestrogen-oestriol) would therefore have to be justified in terms of either offering greater benefits to the women or offering greater value for money to the health service. I find that there is no substantial evidence to suggest that equine HRT offers unique advantages over and above oestriol. I conclude that it would be preferable for a doctor to recommend the synthetic oestrogen to women who want relief from the symptoms of the menopause and protection from osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.

Correcting prolonged bleeding during renal transplantation with estrogen or plasma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and relative effectiveness of conjugated entrogens (CE) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) in normalizing prolonged preoperative bleeding times during renal transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: A university regional referral center for transplantation. PATIENTS: Patients scheduled for renal transplantation with preoperative bleeding times greater than 10 minutes (normal, < 7 minutes) following informed consent were asked to participate in the randomized protocol. Those with bleeding times of 8 to 9.5 minutes were asked, following informed consent, to be a control group receiving neither CE nor FFP. INTERVENTIONS: Following induction of anesthesia and drawing of baseline laboratory tests, patients were administered randomly, using a table of random numbers, either 50 mg of CE or 2 U of FFP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bleeding time measurements and other laboratory tests were repeated at the end of surgery as well as at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Treatment with CE and FFP decreased the patients' bleeding times from 16.68 +/- 0.8 (SEM) and 17.13 +/- 0.85 minutes to 7.67 +/- 0.79 (P < .001) and 10.50 +/- 1.27 minutes (P < .001), respectively, by the end of surgery. At 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, the CE group had bleeding times of 9.77 +/- 0.99 and 9.81 +/- 1.24 minutes (P < .001 for both), respectively, whereas the FFP group bleeding times were 12.76 +/- 1.57 (P = .003) and 12.14 +/- 1.56 minutes (P = .001), respectively. There were no statistical differences for the control group compared with baseline either at the end of surgery or at 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Although both CE and FFP significantly decreased prolonged preoperative bleeding times during renal transplantation, CE might be preferred because of lower risk and cost, as well as a longer duration of action.