Detection of hypoxia in human squamous cell carcinoma by EF5 binding.

Localization and quantitation of 2-nitroimidazole drug binding in low pO2 tumors is a technique that can allow the assessment of hypoxia as a predictive assay. EF5 [2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl) acetamide] is such a drug, and it has been shown to be predictive of radiation response in rodent tumors. Using fluorescence immunohistochemical techniques, we provide data on the presence, distribution, and levels of EF5 binding as a surrogate for hypoxia in human head and neck and uterine cervix squamous cell cancers (SCCs). Six patients with SCC were studied. Four patients had head and neck tumors, and two had uterine cervix cancers. The incubation of fresh tissue cubes in EF3 under hypoxic conditions ("reference binding") demonstrated that all tumors were capable of binding drug, and that this binding varied by a factor of 2.9-fold (174.5-516.1) on an absolute fluorescence scale. In the five patients treated at the lowest drug doses (9 mg/kg), in situ binding was quantitatable. For all six patients, the maximum rate of in situ binding varied by a factor of 6.7 between the lowest and highest binding tumor (24.8-160.3) on an absolute fluorescence scale. In tumors with high binding regions, intratumoral heterogeneity was large, extending from minimal fluorescence (<1%) up to 88.6% of reference binding. In tumors with minimal binding, there was little intratumoral heterogeneity. These studies demonstrate substantial heterogeneity of in situ binding between and within individual squamous cell tumors.

Intervention with the hypoxic tumor cell sensitizer etanidazole in the combined modality treatment of limited stage small-cell lung cancer. A one-institution study.

PURPOSE: We report the toxicity, patterns of failure and survival of a cohort of patients with limited disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with combined radiation and chemotherapy. During the course of thoracic irradiation, we added intravenous (i.v.) etanidazole (SR-2508, a third-generation 2-nitroimidazole) as a hypoxic cell sensitizer in an attempt to reduce the primary local failure rate and improve survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1988 and August 1990, 30 consecutive patients with limited disease SCLC were enrolled and treated on a Phase II protocol receiving a standard combination chemotherapy regimen utilizing i.v. cisplatin 25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, i.v. etoposide 100 mg/m2/day x 3 days alternating with intravenous cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2/day, intravenous doxorubicin 15 mg/m2, and intravenous vincristine 2 mg (CAV) to a total of six cycles every 3 weeks. Radiotherapy and etanidazole were started after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Etanidazole was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 g/m2 three times per week for a total of 30 g/m2 during the course of thoracic radiation that delivered 50.00 Gy tumor dose in 25 fractions in an overall time of 6 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate of the primary lesion in the thorax was 96% (CR + PR), with 64% complete responses. The median time to treatment failure was 18 months. Of the patients that have relapsed, only 18% failed in the thorax (alone or concomitant with other sites). This is a marked improvement compared to the 40-50% rate reported in the literature. The 2-year crude survival was 46%. The 3- and 5-year crude survival rate with no evidence of disease was 33 and 30%, respectively. We have observed a 10% increase in the incidence of transient etanidazole related peripheral neuropathies compared to previous etanidazole studies not utilizing systemic chemotherapy. There was no increased incidence of radiation esophagitis, pulmonary toxicity, or nephro- or myelotoxicity over and above what has been routinely observed with this radio/chemotherapy regimen. There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: The moderate increase in etanidazole-related transient peripheral neuropathies could have been related to the concomitant use of etanidazole with vincristine and cisplatin. Although the almost 50% improvement in the incidence of tumor failure rate in the thorax in this small group of patients did not correlate with an equal marked improvement in their survival, the 5-year survival outcome in our series is at least equal or better than the best reports in the literature of larger clinical trials. We believe there is sufficient data from this study, particularly the improvement of local tumor control, to warrant a large randomized controlled clinical trial, using the most current systemic chemotherapy with concomitant thoracic irradiation with or without the most effective available hypoxic cell cytotoxic/sensitizer.

Pharmacokinetic monitoring and dose modification of etanidazole in the RTOG 85-27 phase III head and neck trial.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic monitoring and drug dose adjustment of Etanidazole (Eta) in patients treated on the RTOG randomized trial for Stage III and IV head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June, 1986 to October, 1991, 521 patients were randomized to conventional RT alone or RT plus Eta. The primary goal was to determine whether the addition of Eta to conventional radiation therapy improves local-regional control and tumor-free survival. Of the 264 patients who received Eta, 233 had their drug exposure calculated and the Eta dose and schedule adjusted accordingly to prevent the occurrence of serious peripheral neuropathy. Drug exposure was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for a single treatment that was calculated by the integral over time of the serum concentration of Eta. The total drug exposure (total-AUC) was estimated by multiplying the AUC by the number of drug administrations. RESULTS: Eighteen percent of patients developed Grade I and 6% developed Grade II peripheral neuropathy. There was no Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy. There is a trend for an increased risk of neuropathy by single dose AUC. The minimal difference in incidence of neuropathy by single-dose AUC was due to the use of dose and schedule modification for patients with the higher values. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics investigated in this study confirm previous work that monitoring Eta levels, with dose adjustment, allows it to be used safely in the clinic. In a subset analysis there was a statistically significant improvement in local-regional control and survival rates for patients with N0 and N1 disease, that will require confirmation (14). However, the clinical efficacy of Eta in this trial proved to be of little overall benefit.

Pilot study of local hyperthermia, radiation therapy, etanidazole, and cisplatin for advanced superficial tumours.

Five patients (six hyperthermia sites) with advanced superficial tumours were treated with combined etanidazole, cisplatin, local hyperthermia, and radiation therapy as part of a Phase I pilot study. Treatment was given once weekly and consisted of etanidazole 3 gm/m2 IV bolus, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV bolus, hyperthermia for 60 min with a target temperature of 43 degrees C, and radiation therapy 500 cGy/fraction (median total dose 3000 cGy) for a total of six weeks. Blood levels of etanidazole were taken during treatment at week 1 and week 4. Etanidazole drug exposure was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and expressed as the area under the curve (AUC) of plasma concentration x time. Five of six treatment sites had received prior irradiation. Prior chemotherapy had been given in three patients and tamoxifen therapy given in the other two patients. The median follow-up time is 34 months; 3/5 patients have died of disease. The most significant toxicity was grade I or II nausea and vomiting associated with 19/32 treatments (59%) and a second degree burn in 2/6 fields. None of the five patients experienced peripheral neuropathy, skin ulceration, or needed surgical repair. In addition, there was mild renal toxicity; pharmacokinetic analysis showed a 28-75% increase in the week 1 to week 4 AUC in three patients, all of whom had a decrease in creatinine clearance over the same time of 15-47%. This pilot study suggests this combined modality therapy can be delivered without major complications and that renal function, determined by creatinine clearance, affects clearance of etanidazole and alters the AUC. Therefore, monitoring renal function is important in patients receiving etanidazole in addition to other nephrotoxic agents such as cisplatin. The impact of etanidazole on the therapeutic index of hyperthermia, radiation therapy and cisplatin may be worth of study, especially since a positive interaction between these modalities is found in laboratory models.

Results of an RTOG phase III trial (RTOG 85-27) comparing radiotherapy plus etanidazole with radiotherapy alone for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy and toxicity of Etanidazole (ETA), a hypoxic cell sensitizer, when combined with conventional radiotherapy (RT) in the management of advanced head and neck carcinomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March 1988 to September 1991, 521 patients who had Stage III or IV head and neck carcinomas were randomized to receive conventional RT alone (66 Gy in 33 fractions to 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 5 fractions per week) or RT+ETA (2.0 g/m2 thrice weekly for 17 doses), of whom 504 were eligible and analyzable. Treatment assignments were stratified before randomization according to the primary site (oral cavity + hypopharynx vs. supraglottic larynx + oropharynx + nasopharynx), T-stage (T1-3 vs. T4), and N-stage (N0-2 vs. N3). Pretreatment characteristics were balanced. In the RT-alone arm, 39% of patients had T3 and 34% had T4 disease, whereas in the RT+ETA arm, 42% of patients had T3 and 33% had T4 disease. Thirty-eight percent of the RT-alone patients and 37% of the RT+ETA patients had N3 disease. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 3.38 years, with a range between 0.96 and 5.63 years. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-four of the 252 (77%) RT+ETA patients received at least 14 doses of the drug. Overall RT protocol compliance rate was 82% in the RT-alone arm and 86% in the RT+ETA arm. No Grade 3 or 4 central nervous system or peripheral neuropathy was observed in the RT+ETA arm. Eighteen percent of the patients developed Grade 1 and 5% developed Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. Other drug related toxicities included nausea/vomiting (27%), low blood counts (15%), and allergy (9%). Most of these toxicities were Grade 1 and 2. The incidence of severe acute and late radiation effects were similar between the two arms. The 2-year actuarial local-regional control rate (LCR) was 40% for the RT-alone arm and 40% for the RT+ETA arm. Two-year actuarial survival was 41% for the RT-alone arm and 43% for the RT+ETA arm (p = 0.65). Multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the influence of covariates on treatment effects. A strong treatment interaction with N-stage was revealed: LCR (50% vs. 40% at 2 years), RT+ETA improved for patients with N0-2 disease but not for N3 patients (22% for RT+ETA and 40% for RT). Further analyses showed that RT+ETA was more advantageous in N0-1 patients, with a 2-year LCR of 55% for RT+ETA vs. 37% for RT only (p = 0.03). A similar phenomenon was observed when using survival as the end point. CONCLUSION: The results showed that adding Etanidazole to conventional RT produced no global benefit for patients who had advanced head and neck carcinomas. There was a suggested benefit for patients who had N0-1 disease, and that needs to be confirmed by another study.

Combined-modality therapy of esophageal cancer with radiotherapy, etanidazole, and cisplatin-fluorouracil, with or without surgery: neurotoxicity, other toxicities and outcome.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether etanidazole and cisplatin can be given safely together and to evaluate the relationship between incidence of peripheral neuropathy and cumulative exposure to etanidazole and cisplatin, as well as other toxicities and treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two previously untreated patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were entered on a Phase I study of etanidazole combined with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Cisplatin/5-FU (two cycles, weeks 1 and 4) and etanidazole (weeks 2, 3 and 5) were given concurrently with radiation therapy. Eligible patients then underwent surgical resection. All patients were scheduled to receive two additional cycles of cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy after completion of radiation therapy (definitive arm) or surgery (preoperative arm). RESULTS: Of 19 fully evaluable patients, nine (47%) developed peripheral neuropathy. Six of six patients, 65 years or older, experienced peripheral neuropathy, compared with three of 13 patients less than 65 years old (p = .003). For patients younger than 65 years, two of the two patients with single dose area under the curve (AUC) > 4.0 mMhr experienced peripheral neuropathy, compared with one of 11 patients with single-dose AUC < 4.0 mMhr (p = .03). Grade 4 toxicity included neutropenia (23%) and thrombocytopenia (26%). No other Grade 4 toxicity was observed. The pathologic complete response rate in patients who underwent surgical resection was 29%. CONCLUSION: This regime of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and etanidazole had acceptable toxicity. However, combining etanidazole and cisplatin appears to increase the risk of developing peripheral neuropathy for at least some categories of patients. Further studies of these interactions are needed.

A phase I study of etanidazole and radiotherapy in malignant glioma.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerable total dose (MTD) of etanidazole (ETA) when administered with external beam radiotherapy (XRT) and as a continuous infusion during stereotactic brachytherapy for patients with malignant glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme or mixed cell tumors). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy previously untreated patients were entered in a Phase I study. Prior to initiation of treatment, patients were stratified according to whether or not they were candidates for interstitial implantation. The implant patients (IMP, n = 17 pt) received accelerated fractionation XRT 20 Gy BID (6 h apart) to 40 Gy in 2 weeks with ETA 2 gm/m2 x 6 doses, a 2 week break and then interstitial implant to 50 Gy (4-7 days) with a continuous infusion of ETA over 90-96 h. The two sequentially conducted nonimplant arms started with accelerated fractionation XRT 2 Gy BID (6 h apart) to 40 Gy in 2 weeks with ETA 2 gm/m2 x 4-5 doses/week. NonIMP 1 arm (n = 38) received a 2-week break before standard fractionated boost XRT of 20 Gy/day for 2 weeks to a total dose of 60 Gy with ETA. NonIMP 2 arm (n = 14) did not have the 2-week break. All patients had plasma pharmacokinetic monitoring of ETA. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the IMP group was the cramping/arthralgia syndrome (4) and the cumulative MTD was 26 gm/m2. For both nonIMP 1 and 2 the DLTs were peripheral neuropathy and the cramping-arthralgia syndrome. The MTD for nonIMP 1 was 34 gm/m2 and nonIMP 2, 30 gm/m2. CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and radiation-related toxicity of these regimens are being evaluated. The doses of ETA that can be used with accelerated fractionation and with external beam irradiation plus brachytherapy have been established.

Phase I/pharmacokinetic/biochemical study of the nitroimadazole hypoxic cell sensitiser SR2508 (etanidazole) in combination with cyclophosphamide.

SR2508 sensitises certain hypoxic tumor cells in vitro and in vivo to the cytotoxic action of radiation and alkylating agents. The mechanism of sensitisation may derive in part from depletion of glutathione (GSH) and possibly inhibition of GSH-dependent enzymes in target cells. We treated 46 evaluable patients with cyclophosphamide 750-1000 mg m-2 followed by SR2508 at eight dose levels ranging from 2.5 to 15.0 g m-2. Each patient received SR2508 as a single agent initially, followed a week later by the combination of cyclophosphamide and SR2508. Initially, myelosuppression was the major toxicity; potentiation of cyclophosphamide-induced leukopenia by SR2508 required a dose reduction of cyclophosphamide to 750 mg m-2 at SR2508 doses above 7.2 g m-2. At doses above 9.4 g m-2 an acute syndrome of muscle pains and painful paresthesias of the extremities lasting 12-24 h was observed to occur with increasing severity. This side-effect was intolerable in two of three patients treated at 15.0 g m-2. The only other reproducible side-effect was nausea and vomiting which was controllable with antiemetics. Plasma and urine SR2508 concentrations were measured by HPLC in 45 patients. Plasma elimination curves fit a 2-compartment model. The mean terminal half-life at each dose level ranged from 5.1-5.8 h. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve was linearly related to dose, and mean total body clearance ranged from 46.6-94.0 ml-1 min-1 m-2; renal clearance accounted for 65.7-79.3%. Pretreatment with cyclophosphamide did not influence the kinetics of SR2508 in individual patients. Examination of the glutathione content of peripheral mononuclear cells and tumour samples showed that depletion to below 50% of control occurred in the majority of patients. GSH transferase inhibition occurred with a similar time-course, but to a lesser extent. These data suggest that the further evaluation of this regimen should be conducted with SR2508 administration preceding that of cyclophosphamide and that its evaluation in cyclophosphamide-sensitive tumours is warranted.