Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.130
Filter
1.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol ; 43(3): 190-197, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023122

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Miltefosine stands as the sole oral medication approved for the treatment of leishmaniasis. The appearance of severe ophthalmic toxicities induced by miltefosine in the context of leishmaniasis treatment is a matter of significant concern. The main objective of this study is to present a comprehensive summary of the ophthalmic adverse effects associated with miltefosine when used in the treatment of leishmaniasis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, covering articles from inception up to June 2023, without language restrictions, to identify relevant studies documenting ocular toxicity following miltefosine treatment for leishmaniasis. RESULTS: A total of eight studies involving 31 leishmaniasis patients who developed ocular toxicities while undergoing miltefosine treatment were included in the analysis. These studies were conducted in various regions, with five originating from India, two from Bangladesh, and one from Nepal. Patients presented a spectrum of ophthalmic complications, including uveitis, keratitis, scleritis, and Mooren's ulcer. Commonly reported symptoms included pain, redness, excessive tearing, partial vision impairment, permanent blindness, light sensitivity, and the appearance of white spots on the eye. On average, patients received miltefosine treatment for a duration of 47 days before experiencing the onset of ocular problems. It is important to note that the risk of ocular toxicities increases with prolonged use of miltefosine. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, to mitigate the potential for irreversible damage to the eyes, it is imperative that all individuals undergoing miltefosine therapy undergo regular eye examinations.


Subject(s)
Antiprotozoal Agents , Phosphorylcholine , Humans , Antiprotozoal Agents/adverse effects , Antiprotozoal Agents/therapeutic use , Phosphorylcholine/analogs & derivatives , Phosphorylcholine/adverse effects , Phosphorylcholine/therapeutic use , Leishmaniasis/drug therapy , Eye Diseases/chemically induced
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 188: 147-157, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964252

ABSTRACT

The treatment landscape of gynecologic cancers has expanded in recent years to include targeted and immune-based therapies. These therapies often have ocular side effects not seen with conventional chemotherapies, some of which can cause significant visual impairment if not recognized in a timely fashion. Clinicians must know how to appropriately identify, mitigate, and treat these ocular adverse events. Management often involves working with an interdisciplinary team of eye specialists, and it is important to know when to refer patients for specialized care. Proactive identification of eye specialists, especially in rural and community settings where access to care can be limited, may be necessary. Here, we discuss the management of common ocular toxicities seen with novel anticancer agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Genital Neoplasms, Female , Humans , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced
4.
Surv Ophthalmol ; 69(5): 733-742, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782129

ABSTRACT

Ocular damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may cause insidious visual impairment, but its clinical features and the risk of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)-related complications are still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate ocular damage in SLE, the correlation between eye and systemic involvement, and the ocular side effects of treatment. The database PubMed, Embase, and Ovid were used for literature from reception to July, 2023, and the calculation was carried out with R. About 48,693 patients from 66 studies were included. The results indicated that ocular damage in SLE was insidious, appearing in 28 % of patients with no complaints. The most common symptoms and manifestations were dry eye (30 %) and keratoconjunctivitis sicca (26 %). Retinopathy was detected in 10 % of patients and was related to antiphospholipid antibodies (25 % versus 8 %). The proportion of retinopathy also significantly increased in patients with lupus nephropathy or neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (risk ratio of 2.29 and 1.95, respectively). HCQ was used in 82 % of patients, of which 4 % suffered from ocular toxicity. HCQ-related retinopathy was dose-dependent. Dosage below 5 mg/kg/d was relatively effective and safe for long-term use, while routine examination was recommended.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Hydroxychloroquine , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Risk Factors , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Retinal Diseases/chemically induced , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/etiology
5.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 23(7): 877-884, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739482

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to characterize the ocular safety profiles of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors and explore the differences among different PDE5 inhibitors. METHODS: We analyzed reports on ocular adverse events associated with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to evaluate reporting risk profiles. RESULTS: Among 61,211 reports qualifying for analysis, 5,127 involved sildenafil, 832 vardenafil, and 3,733 tadalafil. All PDE5 inhibitors showed increased reporting odds ratios (ROR) for ocular adverse events, with vardenafil highest (ROR 4.47) followed by sildenafil and tadalafil. Key ocular adverse events included cyanopsia, optic ischemic neuropathy, visual field defects, unilateral blindness and blindness. Sildenafil showed the highest disproportionality for cyanopsia (ROR 1148.11) while vardenafil and tadalafil showed the highest disproportionality for optic ischemic neuropathy. Time-to-onset analysis also revealed significant differences, with sildenafil having a later median time-to-onset compared to vardenafil and tadalafil. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive pharmacovigilance study reveals distinct patterns of ocular adverse events associated with PDE5 inhibitors. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the safety profiles of PDE5 inhibitors and may guide healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Databases, Factual , Eye Diseases , Pharmacovigilance , Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors , Sildenafil Citrate , Tadalafil , Vardenafil Dihydrochloride , Humans , Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Tadalafil/adverse effects , Tadalafil/administration & dosage , Sildenafil Citrate/adverse effects , Sildenafil Citrate/administration & dosage , Male , Vardenafil Dihydrochloride/adverse effects , Vardenafil Dihydrochloride/administration & dosage , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult
6.
J Immunoassay Immunochem ; 45(3): 178-188, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722204

ABSTRACT

Immunosuppressive agents are routinely used to control autoimmunity. However, some adverse events are correlated to their clinical applications. The aim of this study was to study the clinical findings and ocular and cutaneous side effects of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as current immunomodulators, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This descriptive study was performed on 360 individuals referred to the Rheumatology clinic during 2003-2020. Demographic characteristics and other information were collected from patients with RA and SLE. Skin and ocular complications were evaluated in patients who were on treatment with CQ and HCQ. Study populations consisted of 199 subjects with RA and 161 cases with SLE. The frequencies of skin and ocular complications in all patients treated with CQ and HCQ were 32 (17.65%) and 94 (51.9%), respectively. The prevalence of skin complications in patients with RA and SLE was 20 (10.05%) and 22 (13.66%), respectively. The frequencies of ocular complications in patients with RA and SLE were, respectively, 58 (29.4%) and 36 (22.5%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that ophthalmic complications of CQ and HCQ in all patients were dependent on the effects of the duration of drug uses, disease duration, and cumulative doses (p < 0.05), unlike skin complications. Disease types had no effect on ocular complications. Based on these findings, treatment with CQ and HCQ participates in some skin and ocular complications in patients with RA and SLE which are largely associated with the duration of disease and treatment.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Chloroquine , Hydroxychloroquine , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Aged
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1303589, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455056

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is affecting the world with a surge in cases. A variety of autoimmune diseases occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, of which IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an important type. IgG4-RD can involve multiple organs of the body. The ocular manifestation of IgG4-RD is called IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD). We herein report a patient diagnosed with IgG4-ROD. The patient developed ptosis and vision loss after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and the symptoms worsened after SARS-CoV-2 infection. After excluding other diseases like myasthenia gravis and Eaton-Lambert syndrome that may cause ptosis, the diagnosis of IgG4-ROD was confirmed by pathological examination. We discussed the predisposing factors, diagnosis and treatment of this patient to provide a more empirical and theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. We conducted a literature review of previously reported cases of IgG4-RD following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. We retrieved a total of 9 cases, of which 5 developed symptoms after vaccination and 4 after infection. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized. In conclusion, our case represents the first case of proven IgG4-ROD after COVID-19 vaccination. We believe that IgG4-ROD and SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination are closely related, and the immune system disorder caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination may be a key factor in the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD. But for now, there is no direct evidence that there is a causal relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and IgG4-ROD, which still needs more research and exploration to confirm.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Eye Diseases , Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease/chemically induced , Vaccination , Eye Diseases/chemically induced
9.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 56(8): 2635-2644, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498275

ABSTRACT

Tumor growth is intricately linked to the process of angiogenesis, with a key role played by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its associated signaling pathways. Notably, these pathways also play a pivotal "housekeeping" role in renal physiology. Over the past decade, the utilization of VEGF signaling inhibitors has seen a substantial rise in the treatment of diverse solid organ tumors, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and various ocular diseases. However, this increased use of such agents has led to a higher frequency of encountering renal adverse effects in clinical practice. This review comprehensively addresses the incidence, pathophysiological mechanisms, and current evidence concerning renal adverse events associated with systemic and intravitreal antiangiogenic therapies targeting VEGF-A and its receptors (VEGFR) and their associated signaling pathways. Additionally, we briefly explore strategies for mitigating potential risks linked to the use of these agents and effectively managing various renal adverse events, including but not limited to hypertension, proteinuria, renal dysfunction, and electrolyte imbalances.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Humans , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Ranibizumab/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Sunitinib/adverse effects , Aptamers, Nucleotide/adverse effects , Intravitreal Injections , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Indazoles , Pyrimidines , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Sulfonamides
10.
Eur J Haematol ; 113(1): 66-71, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549191

ABSTRACT

The rise of immuno-oncology, including the use of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is bringing in a new wave of cancer treatments, particularly in hematologic malignancies. However, data on their adverse events, particularly of the eye, is under-reported. To assess the ocular adverse events associated with the six FDA-approved CAR-T cell therapies, a disproportionality analysis utilizing the FAERS database was conducted from the first quarter of 2017 to the third quarter of 2023, as well as a systematic review of case reports of ocular events following CAR-T cell therapy up to December 20, 2023. A total of 53 ocular adverse events were identified from the FDAs FAERS database. The adverse events most frequently observed were mydriasis and xerophthalmia with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah). The systematic review resulted in 8 case reports encompassing 19 patients which included a total of 27 events. This study demonstrates the importance of anticipation of potential ocular adverse events by ophthalmologists and oncologists as they can greatly contribute to morbidity in patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Pharmacovigilance , Humans , Eye Diseases/etiology , Eye Diseases/therapy , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods
11.
Oncologist ; 29(5): e616-e621, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527005

ABSTRACT

MEK signaling pathway targeting has emerged as a valuable addition to the options available for the treatment of advanced cancers including melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Ophthalmologic monitoring of patients taking part in clinical trials of MEK inhibitors has shown that while ocular effects are common, generally emerging during the first days to weeks of treatment, the majority are either asymptomatic or have minimal visual impact and are benign, resolving without intervention or the need to reduce or stop MEK inhibitor therapy. However rare cases of serious, potentially vision-threatening ocular toxicities have been reported during MEK inhibitor therapy. There is currently no recommendation for routine ophthalmologic screening or monitoring of patients with advanced cancer who are initiating MEK inhibitor therapy. However, baseline ophthalmologic examination may be useful for all patients initiating MEK inhibitor therapy to allow the differentiation of preexisting pathology versus the development of MEK inhibitor-associated retinopathy in the event of the emergence of symptomatic ocular events. Regular ophthalmologic examination may be appropriate for patients at increased risk for ocular events, such as patients with a history of ocular inflammation, infection, or underlying macular/retinal disease. All patients reporting visual disturbance should be referred for prompt ophthalmologic review to determine the potential seriousness of any underlying abnormalities and whether there is a need for treatment modification or specific intervention. Understanding the potential consequences of ocular toxicities is of particular importance in the context of decision-making for the continuation of potentially life-prolonging medications such as MEK inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors
12.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 262(7): 2269-2281, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345654

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Targeted cancer therapies have been responsible for a dramatic shift in treatment strategies for cancer, and the number of drugs, classes, and indications are continually growing. Neuro-ophthalmic complications of these medications are an uncommon but important subset of adverse events which profoundly impact vision. This review aims to collate studies and reports of known neuro-ophthalmic complications of targeted therapies and describe their management. METHODS: The anti-cancer drugs included in the review were any drugs targeting specific molecules involved in the cancer disease process. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using the generic names of each drug and keywords of neuro-ophthalmic conditions. The prescribing information published by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for each drug was also reviewed. RESULTS: Several classes of targeted anti-cancer drugs were found to cause neuro-ophthalmic adverse effects. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are responsible for a raft of immune-related adverse events such as optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, PRES, and myasthenia gravis. Therapies with anti-VEGF activity can provoke posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy, which commonly presents with visual loss and can be fatal if not treated promptly. Inhibitors of BCR-ABL1, VEGF, ALK, and proteasomes have all been linked to optic nerve disorders which can have debilitating consequences for vision. CONCLUSION: The neuro-ophthalmic complications of modern anti-cancer drugs can limit or necessitate the withdrawal of these life-prolonging medications. Ophthalmologists should be alert for neuro-ophthalmic complications in these medications to facilitate prompt diagnosis and treatment and reduce the risk of severe and permanent consequences.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/diagnosis
14.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 31(1): 1-10, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36864662

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We conducted a scoping review of studies examining ambient air pollution as a risk factor for chronic eye disease influencing the lens, retina, and intraocular pressure in adults. METHODS: Terms related to air pollution and eye disease outcomes were used to search for publications on Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Global Health, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 2010, through April 11, 2022. RESULTS: We identified 27 articles, focusing on the following non-mutually exclusive outcomes: cataract (n = 9), presbyopia (n = 1), retinal vein occlusion or central retinal arteriolar and venular equivalents (n = 5), intraocular pressure (IOP) (n = 3), glaucoma (n = 5), age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (n = 5), diabetic retinopathy (n = 2), and measures of retinal morphology (n = 3). Study designs included cross-sectional (n = 16), case-control (n = 4), and longitudinal (n = 7). Air pollutants were measured in 50% and 95% of the studies on lens and retina or IOP, respectively, and these exposures were assigned to geographic locations. Most research was conducted in global regions with high exposure to air pollution. Consistent associations suggested a possibly increased risk of cataract and retina-associated chronic eye disease with increasing exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5-PM10), NO2, NOx, and SO2. Associations with O3 were less consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulating research suggests air pollution may be a modifiable risk factor for chronic eye diseases of the lens and retina. The number of studies on each specific lens- or retina-related outcome is limited. Guidelines regarding the role of air pollution in chronic eye disease do not exist.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution , Eye Diseases , Adult , Humans , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , Cataract/epidemiology , Cataract/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Eye Diseases/etiology , Eye Diseases/chemically induced
15.
Surv Ophthalmol ; 69(1): 34-41, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37777119

ABSTRACT

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors are an emerging class of small molecule targeted cancer drugs with promising therapeutic possibilities for a wide variety of malignancies. While ocular adverse events from FGFR inhibitors are reported in clinical trials, subsequent case studies continue to reveal new toxicities. Disease pathology affecting multiple parts of the eye has been reported, but the ocular surface and the retina are the most commonly encountered areas affected by FGFR inhibitors, manifesting as dry eye and FGFR inhibitor-associated retinopathy, respectively. Corneal thinning and melt is a rare but serious and potentially vision-threatening complication of FGFR inhibitor toxicity. Similarities between toxicities observed from other targeted cancer therapy drugs and FGFR inhibitors may help us understand underlying pathophysiological changes. The management of these adverse events requires close ophthalmologic follow-up and may require discontinuation of the offending agents in some cases.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Eye Diseases , Humans , Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/drug therapy
16.
Environ Pollut ; 343: 123279, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160774

ABSTRACT

Eye diseases impose a significant burden on health services due to high case numbers. However, exposure to outdoor air pollution is seldom mentioned as potential harmful factor. We conducted a time-series analysis in Rome, Italy, to estimate the association between daily mean concentration of NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 and daily number of emergency room (ER) admissions for a selected cluster of eye diseases from 2006 to 2016. We used Poisson regression adjusted for time trend, population decrease during summer vacations and holidays, day of week, apparent temperature (hot and cold) and daily concentration of nine pollen species. We observed 581,868 ER admissions during the study period. 44.74% of cases were observed in subjects with less than 20 years, 19.50% in 51-65 age category and 13.4% among children (0-14 years). No differences between sexes were recorded. Mean values of pollutant concentrations were 54.75, 31.01 and 18.14 µg/m3 for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 respectively. The air temperature ranged from -1 °C to 32.5 °C, with a mean value of 16 °C (SD = 6.88). The apparent temperature spaced from -3.58 °C to 34.08 °C (mean = 15.61 °C, SD = 8.5). The highest percent risk increases for 10 µg/m3 increases of the three pollutants were observed at lag0-1 day (1.3%, 0.63-1.98 for PM2.5; 1.03%, 0.56-1.51 for PM10 and 0.6%, 0.13-1.07 for NO2). Risk increased significantly also at lag0 and lag0-5 day for each pollutant. Secondary analyses showed higher effects in the elderly compared to younger subjects. No differences emerged between sexes. The dose response analysis suggested of possible effects on ER admission risk also at low-level concentrations of PM2.5. A strong confounding effect of pollen was not detected. RESULTS: of this study are coherent with previous analyses. Speculation can be done about the biological mechanisms that link air pollution to eye damage.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Eye Diseases , Child , Humans , Aged , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Air Pollutants/analysis , Rome/epidemiology , Nitrogen Dioxide/analysis , Air Pollution/analysis , Italy/epidemiology , Particulate Matter/analysis , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , China/epidemiology
17.
J Trace Elem Med Biol ; 82: 127358, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38113800

ABSTRACT

Humans are exposed to cadmium and lead in various regions of the world daily due to industrial development and climate change. Increasing numbers of preclinical and clinical studies indicate that heavy metals, such as cadmium and lead, play a role in the pathogenesis of eye diseases. Excessive exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium and lead can increase the risk of impaired vision. Therefore, it is essential to better characterize the role of these non-essential metals in disease etiology and progression. This article discusses the potential role of cadmium and lead in the development of age-related eye diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, cataracts, and glaucoma. Furthermore, we discuss how cadmium and lead affect ocular cells and provide an overview of putative pathological mechanisms associated with their propensity to damage the eye.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Metals, Heavy , Humans , Cadmium/toxicity , Cadmium/analysis , Lead/toxicity , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced
18.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 141(11): 1062-1065, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796497

ABSTRACT

Importance: Recently, intravitreal pegcetacoplan became the first drug to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of geographic atrophy associated with nonexudative age-related macular degeneration, but the administration of this medication may be associated with unanticipated posttreatment complications. Objective: To assess the prevalence of presumed silicone oil droplets in the vitreous cavity after intravitreal injection of pegcetacoplan. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series study involved a retrospective record review of all 55 patients treated with intravitreal pegcetacoplan, 0.1 mL in 150-mg/mL solution, between March 24 and June 5, 2023, at a single specialty retina practice. All injections were done using needles from the kit supplied by Apellis Pharmaceuticals on a 1-mL McKesson Luer lock syringe. Main Outcomes and Measures: The presence or absence of presumed silicone bubbles detected during dilated biomicroscopic fundus examination and/or on color fundus photographs, the presence or absence of symptoms, change in visual acuity, and/or increase in intraocular pressure. Results: A total of 62 intravitreal pegcetacoplan injections were given to 55 patients (mean [SD] age, 83.8 [7.8] years; 33 women [60%]) from March 24 to June 5, 2023. Of the 55 patients, 16 (29%; mean [SD] age, 83.8 [7.4] years; 9 women [56%]) had presumed intravitreal silicone droplets discovered 2 to 4 weeks after treatment, 3 of which were documented on color fundus photographs. Of the 16 patients, 14 (88%) were symptomatic for new floaters that they described as persistent, while 2 (13%) were asymptomatic. There were no signs of inflammation or infection, no increases in intraocular pressure, and no changes in visual acuity for all 16 patients. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial percentage of patients had symptomatic floaters from presumed intravitreal silicone oil droplets after injections of pegcetacoplan using a McKesson 1-mL Luer lock syringe. These findings support consideration of informing patients of this potential adverse effect, avoiding use of the McKesson syringe, and considering use of silicone-free syringes for pegcetacoplan injections.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Geographic Atrophy , Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Intravitreal Injections , Silicone Oils/adverse effects , Silicones , Retrospective Studies , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Retina , Geographic Atrophy/chemically induced
19.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol ; 42(4): 248-252, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531133

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the predictive effect of pre-injection intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior segment parameters on post-injection IOP values after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) in phakic and pseudophakic patient groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 65 eyes of 65 treatment-naive NVAMD patients. Patients were divided into two groups according to their lens status (35 phakic and 30 pseudophakic patients). Pre-injection IOP, anterior segment parameters measured with PENTACAM, and post-injection IOP values measured at the 5th minute were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to recognise the predictive effect of pre-injection IOP and anterior segment parameters on post-injection IOP for each group. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analyses showed that the decrease in anterior chamber depth (ACD), and the increase in pre-injection IOP were significantly correlated with higher post-injection IOP in the phakic patient group (p = 0.019 and 0.031; respectively). No correlation was found in the pseudophakic patient group. CONCLUSION: Pre-injection ACD and IOP values may be predictive of higher post-injection IOP in phakic patients. Preoperative assessment of these parameters could be beneficial in patients at risk of glaucoma.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Intraocular Pressure , Humans , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Intravitreal Injections , Eye Diseases/chemically induced
20.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63(8): 909-917, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042170

ABSTRACT

The cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept for ocular diseases is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety in patients receiving ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept for ocular disease. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2017 (Q1) to 2021 (Q4) in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The outcomes of interest were central nervous system vascular disorders, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, torsade de pointes/QT prolongation, embolic and thrombotic events, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac failure, and cardiomyopathy. Data mining was performed by a disproportional method with a compression, using compressed reporting odds ratios (sRORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to measure signals. The results showed 1462 cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with aflibercept, 834 with ranibizumab, and 150 with bevacizumab. Ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept were linked to central nervous system vascular disorders (sROR, 5.57[95%CI, 4.95-6.26] vs sROR, 2.23 [95%CI, 1.75-2.85] vs sROR, 2.73[95%CI, 2.43-3.06]), ischemic heart disease (sROR, 3.31[95%CI, 2.65-4.13] vs sROR, 1.98 [95%CI, 1.24-3.16] vs sROR, 3.00 [95%CI, 2.46-3.65]), embolic and thrombotic (sROR, 3.36 [95%CI, 3.04-3.72] vs sROR, 2.16 [95%CI, 1.70-2.74] vs sROR, 5.25 [95%CI, 4.82-5.72]). Both ranibizumab and bevacizumab produced hypertension (sROR, 1.73 [95%CI, 1.41-2.12] vs sROR, 1.46 [95%CI, 1.03-2.06]) and arrhythmias (sROR, 2.82 [95%CI, 1.99-3.99] vs sROR, 2.13 [95%CI, 1.08-4.22]) signals. The signals of heart failure were detected in ranibizumab (sROR, 5.64 [95%CI, 4.08-7.79]) and aflibercept (sROR, 2.80 [95%CI, 2.03-3.86]). Ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept for ocular disease have different safety profiles in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular. The overall cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk of the patient should be thoroughly assessed in order to select the safest drug for treatment.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Hypertension , Myocardial Ischemia , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Ranibizumab/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Visual Acuity , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , Myocardial Ischemia/chemically induced , Myocardial Ischemia/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/drug therapy , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Intravitreal Injections
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL