Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 529
Filter
2.
J Physician Assist Educ ; 35(2): 162-166, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345546

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Blue sky thinking references the opportunity to brainstorm about a topic without limits… to consider what things might be like if creative thoughts were unconstrained by current philosophies or other boundaries. This article is a call to our fellow educators to consider how blue sky thinking applied to physician assistant (PA) program accreditation might further advance programs, faculty, and the profession. To develop and maintain a PA program, institutions must voluntarily undergo evaluation by the Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant. Compliance with accreditation encourages sound educational practices, promotes program self-study, stimulates innovation, maintains confidence with the public, and focuses on continuous quality improvement. In addition, accreditation "can hold institutions accountable for desired outcomes and professional standards." Indeed, while the PA profession has promulgated across the globe, the 50+ years of graduating PAs educated with the highest quality education assures that the United States remains a gold standard. As the 5th edition of the standards are implemented and planning for the 6th edition is underway, in the spirit of continuous quality improvement, we encourage stakeholders of the PA profession to contemplate ways in which accreditation might continue to purposefully advance a desired future state for the profession. In this article, we draw on examples from other health professions which might inform a discussion around the future of PA accreditation. Specifically, the topics of a unified profession title and degree, a specific title and position for program leadership, a modification to how PA programs receive medical direction, and efforts to advance scholarship are addressed.


Subject(s)
Accreditation , Physician Assistants , Physician Assistants/education , Physician Assistants/standards , Accreditation/standards , Humans , United States , Faculty/standards , Faculty/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration
4.
s.l; MSALCHILE; mar. 2023.
Non-conventional in Spanish | BRISA/RedTESA | ID: biblio-1555043

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los centros asistenciales docentes cumplen un rol relevante en los sistemas de salud, aportando experticia a los cuidados clínicos a través de la educación y la investigación (2). En Chile, la relación asistencial docente (RAD) se encuentra regulada por la Norma Técnica General N°254 (1). La RAD es un vínculo estratégico y de largo plazo que une al sector público de salud con centros formadores, que tiene como objetivo formar y disponer de profesionales y técnicos competentes para satisfacer las necesidades de salud de la población, generando un beneficio sobre la calidad de atención que reciben los usuarios del SNSS (1). En este sentido, la formación de profesionales y técnicos del sector salud constituye un eje estratégico en el desarrollo del sistema. Esta norma detalla el alcance de los centros formadores y docentes, y de las actividades de colaboración entre profesionales y estudiantes (1). En este sentido, en la literatura se ha reportado el posible impacto que pudiera tener este tipo de relación en el tiempo de espera, calidad de la atención, satisfacción usuaria y otros temas relacionados en la atención a personas en contextos hospitalarios y ambulatorios, tanto para usuarios, estudiantes e instituciones asistenciales (hospitales, clínicas o centros ambulatorios docentes) que se vinculan con centros formadores (3­7). En este contexto, y con el objetivo de entregar justificación actualizada y relevante para el proyecto de ley que regula la RAD, la Jefatura del Dpto. de Formación, Capacitación y Educación Continua, junto con la Oficina del Gabinete de la Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, han solicitado una síntesis rápida de la evidencia sobre el efecto de la formación académica en establecimientos asistenciales de estudiantes de pre y postgrado, en la productividad asistencial. METODOLOGIA: Se identificaron inicialmente 634 revisiones sistemáticas (RS). De éstas, se excluyeron 632 por disenso o duplicados, y se utilizaron 2 RS (3,4) publicadas en 2002 y 2015. A los estudios primarios incluidos en las RS utilizadas, se les aplicaron los mismos criterios de inclusión y exclusión que los aplicados en las RS (cuadro de metodología). Con estos criterios, se consideraron finalmente 10 estudios primarios, la totalidad de ellos fueron de tipo observacional (8­17). Para estimar el efecto de los hallazgos de esta SRE, se utilizaron los 10 estudios referidos en las 2 RS (3,4), en los cuales la comparación se realizó con centros asistenciales no docentes. RESULTADOS: Los hallazgos aquí presentados se han separado de acuerdo a tres desenlaces de interés: 1. Productividad clínica medida como tiempo de atención (8,10,11,13); 2. Productividad clínica medida como la cantidad de tareas realizadas por rango de tiempo (número de usuarios o trámites administrativos)(8,9,11­13) y 3. Satisfacción Usuaria (14­17). Cada hallazgo contiene además una tabla resumen con los resultados, mostrando la certeza en la evidencia de cada uno de los desenlaces reportados. CONSIDERACIONES DE IMPLEMENTACIÓN: Para el análisis de las consideraciones de implementación, durante la selección de títulos, resúmenes y texto completo de esta síntesis, se realizó una selección de revisiones sistemáticas que pudieran entregar antecedentes para el análisis de la aplicabilidad de la evidencia al contexto local, consideraciones económicas, equidad y de monitoreo y evaluación.


Subject(s)
Humans , Training Support/methods , Health Education/organization & administration , Faculty/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics
5.
J Vet Med Educ ; 49(2): 164-171, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33929939

ABSTRACT

Instructors and administrators recognize that our world demands graduates who are not only prepared to meet today's challenges but are also equipped to tackle novel problems of the future. This article describes the creation of an interdisciplinary, team-taught course designed using features of collaborative learning and problem-based learning with a focus on the impact of teaching with a large number of faculty. The course was well-received by students with positive feedback about integration of previous curricular content and a low-pressure learning environment. However, the course was not without its challenges. Participation from over half of the program's teaching faculty required a considerable investment of time and resulted in weekly inconsistencies throughout the semester. This article highlights successes, challenges, and recommendations for others seeking to design a course with a similar number of faculty. This course style is referred to as a "massive, multi-team organized (MMO) course."


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Veterinary , Faculty/organization & administration , Problem-Based Learning , Animals , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Humans
6.
Elife ; 102021 09 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34554086

ABSTRACT

Universities and research institutions have to assess individuals when making decisions about hiring, promotion and tenure, but there are concerns that such assessments are overly reliant on metrics and proxy measures of research quality that overlook important factors such as academic rigor, data sharing and mentoring. These concerns have led to calls for universities and institutions to reform the methods they use to assess research and researchers. Here we present a new tool called SPACE that has been designed to help universities and institutions implement such reforms. The tool focuses on five core capabilities and can be used by universities and institutions at all stages of reform process.


Subject(s)
Academic Success , Academies and Institutes , Faculty , Research Personnel , Universities , Academies and Institutes/organization & administration , Academies and Institutes/standards , Career Mobility , Faculty/organization & administration , Faculty/standards , Humans , Organizational Culture , Personnel Selection , Policy Making , Research Personnel/organization & administration , Research Personnel/standards
8.
J Occup Health ; 63(1): e12248, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34217154

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern university from February to July 2020 via focus group (FG) discussions with university employees (n = 22) and semistructured interviews with university administrators (n = 10). We used techniques from expanded grounded theory, allowing for a constant comparative approach to data contextualization and theme identification. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the FG data: (i) program and policy scope, (ii) employee and employer benefits, and (iii) workplace concerns. Onsite daycares, flexible schedules and participation, and expanded childcare options were some of the programs and policies employees desired. However, barriers to implementing these types of programs include cost, safety, and structure of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings offer practical recommendations and strategies to improve work/life balance among parents transitioning back to work in a university environment. Findings also provide insight into the feasibility of family-friendly workplace policies and environments. Additionally, findings provide a framework for other organizations to implement similar Infant at Work programs to improve employee work/life balance.


Subject(s)
Faculty/psychology , Infant Care/psychology , Organizational Policy , Return to Work/psychology , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Faculty/organization & administration , Female , Focus Groups , Grounded Theory , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Culture , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Program Evaluation , Social Environment , Universities , Workplace/organization & administration
10.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 148(1): 133e-139e, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181621

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: The coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic became a global threat in a matter of weeks, with its future implications yet to be defined. New York City was swiftly declared the epicenter of the pandemic in the United States as case numbers grew exponentially in a matter of days, quickly threatening to overwhelm the capacity of the health care system. This burgeoning crisis led practitioners across specialties to adapt and mobilize rapidly. Plastic surgeons and trainees within the New York University Langone Health system faced uncertainty in terms of future practice, in addition to immediate and long-term effects on undergraduate and graduate medical education. The administration remained vigilant and adaptive, enacting departmental policies prioritizing safety and productivity, with early deployment of faculty for clinical support at the front lines. The authors anticipate that this pandemic will have far-reaching effects on the future of plastic surgery education, trends in the pursuit of elective surgical procedures, and considerable consequences for certain research endeavors. Undoubtedly, there will be substantial impact on the physical and mental well-being of health care practitioners across specialties. Coordinated efforts and clear lines of communication between the Department of Plastic Surgery and its faculty and trainees allowed a concerted effort toward the immediate challenge of tempering the spread of coronavirus disease of 2019 and preserving structure and throughput for education and research. Adaptation and creativity have ultimately allowed for early rebooting of in-person clinical and surgical practice. The authors present their coordinated efforts and lessons gleaned from their experience to inform their community's preparedness as this formidable challenge evolves.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Surgery, Plastic/trends , Academic Medical Centers/standards , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/trends , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/trends , Elective Surgical Procedures/education , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures/trends , Faculty/organization & administration , Faculty/psychology , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Forecasting , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , New York City/epidemiology , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/trends , Plastic Surgery Procedures/education , Plastic Surgery Procedures/standards , Plastic Surgery Procedures/trends , Surgeons/organization & administration , Surgeons/psychology , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surgery, Plastic/education , Surgery, Plastic/organization & administration , Surgery, Plastic/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Uncertainty , Universities/standards , Universities/statistics & numerical data , Universities/trends
11.
Ann Surg ; 274(5): e381-e382, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34117150

ABSTRACT

Virtual recruitment of candidates applying into General Surgery residency during the COVID-19 pandemic presented a number of benefits and challenges. Notable benefits for candidates included financial and resource cost savings, the ability to conduct multiple interviews within short time frame, and the ability to meet more faculty members on virtual interview day. Challenges included technological difficulties, difficulty assessing culture and authenticity of in-program relationships, zoom fatigue, and inability to form relationships with co-applicants. After assessing our experiences with these benefits and challenges, the authors recommend that future recruitment cycles maintain virtual interview days with optional, nonevaluative open house days for revisit and second look opportunities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Faculty/organization & administration , General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Pandemics , Humans
14.
J Dermatol Sci ; 102(1): 2-6, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33563497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A wide gender gap exists in many fields in Japan, including the academic society of dermatology. Women are substantially underrepresented in the highest academic ranks. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the possible factors contributing to the current gender gap in the field of academic dermatology and to recommend necessary measures to decrease the gender gap. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of faculty members' academic productivity at the dermatology departments of all the educational institutions in Japan in 2019. RESULTS: Women had significantly lower academic productivity than men. A significant gender difference in academic productivity was found in lecturers and assistant professors but not in associate professor and professor positions. This gender difference was still significant after normalizing the productivity for career length. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the need to encourage women lecturers and assistant professors to improve their academic achievement to decrease the gender gap in academic dermatology.


Subject(s)
Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Leadership , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatology/organization & administration , Faculty/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Universities/organization & administration , Universities/statistics & numerical data
15.
Lab Med ; 52(5): 420-425, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33340319

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a major toll on the economy and funding for public education. For that reason, the pandemic has a worrisome effect on the sustainability of university/college based Medical Laboratory Sciences MLS training programs. Stakeholders of university-based MLS programs include university administrators, students, clinical affiliates and faculty. Each group has specific goals and challenges that affect the sustainability of the program. This report details strategies that can be used to satisfy the goals specific to key stakeholders that lead to sustainability. These strategies apply in pandemic times and in the back-to-normal future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Medical Laboratory Science/economics , Program Evaluation/economics , Strategic Planning , Universities/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Faculty/organization & administration , Florida/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Laboratory Science/trends , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Stakeholder Participation
16.
Acad Med ; 96(7): 979-988, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33332909

ABSTRACT

The American Medical Association's (AMA's) Accelerating Change in Medical Education (ACE) initiative, launched in 2013 to foster advancements in undergraduate medical education, has led to the development and scaling of innovations influencing the full continuum of medical training. Initial grants of $1 million were awarded to 11 U.S. medical schools, with 21 schools joining the consortium in 2016 at a lower funding level. Almost one-fifth of all U.S. MD- and DO-granting medical schools are represented in the 32-member consortium. In the first 5 years, the consortium medical schools have delivered innovative educational experiences to approximately 19,000 medical students, who will provide a potential 33 million patient care visits annually. The core initiative objectives focus on competency-based approaches to medical education and individualized pathways for students, training in health systems science, and enhancing the learning environment. At the close of the initial 5-year grant period, AMA leadership sought to catalogue outputs and understand how the structure of the consortium may have influenced its outcomes. Themes from qualitative analysis of stakeholder interviews as well as other sources of evidence aligned with the 4 elements of the transformational leadership model (inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, and idealized influence) and can be used to inform future innovation interventions. For example, the ACE initiative has been successful in stimulating change at the consortium schools and propagating those innovations broadly, with outputs involving medical students, faculty, medical schools, affiliated health systems, and the broader educational landscape. In summary, the ACE initiative has fostered a far-reaching community of innovation that will continue to drive change across the continuum of medical education.


Subject(s)
American Medical Association/organization & administration , Education, Medical/trends , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/trends , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Faculty/organization & administration , Financing, Organized/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Leadership , Learning , Organizational Innovation , Preceptorship/methods , Schools, Medical/economics , Stakeholder Participation , United States
19.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 26(1): 215-235, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583328

ABSTRACT

The physical therapy profession in the United States suffers from a shortage of providers of color. This is unlikely to change with newly graduating students, as 2.6% of 2017 graduates were African American and 5.7% were Hispanic or Latino. Faculty mentorship has a more profound influence on the retention of underrepresented minority students as compared with students from privileged backgrounds, according to undergraduate literature. The influences of faculty characteristics on physical therapy graduates of color are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine faculty and programmatic characteristics that could influence the percentage of physical therapy graduates of color. This study implemented the theory of academic capitalism to inform the results of a retrospective panel analysis, which used accreditation data from 2008 to 2017. Data from 231 programs was used to create fixed effects and random effects models to estimate the effects that faculty and program characteristics had on the percentage of graduates of color that a program produced. There was a statistically significant positive relationship between faculty of color and graduates of color (p < 0.001), but faculty must be sufficiently diverse before a program can expect a meaningful change in their percentage of graduates of color. Academic capitalist principles suggest that competition between programs for resources could negatively influence the proportion of graduates of color. Cause and effect associations between variables cannot be established. The authors concluded that professional physical therapy programs appeared to have increases in the percentages of graduates of color when they had more core faculty members of color.


Subject(s)
Faculty/organization & administration , Mentoring/organization & administration , Minority Groups , Physical Therapy Modalities/education , Humans , Retrospective Studies , United States
20.
Acad Med ; 96(2): 170-172, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910002

ABSTRACT

Medical schools across the United States and Canada constantly consider how to improve their curricula and their pedagogical strategies. The authors found it informative to compare how students in 2 professional schools, medicine and business, are taught. The authors believe that creating the best future physicians requires students and faculty to be physically together to learn essential skills. Increasing student interactions with peers and faculty enhances learning, and the classroom is a natural place for these interactions to take place. Requiring medical students to attend teaching sessions in the preclinical curriculum should help foster their development of core competencies, including critical decision making, clinical reasoning, and patient-centered care.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/methods , Faculty/education , Learning/physiology , Teaching/standards , Canada/epidemiology , Clinical Competence , Clinical Reasoning , Commerce/education , Curriculum/standards , Decision Making/ethics , Faculty/organization & administration , Humans , Patient-Centered Care/ethics , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Peer Group , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Students/statistics & numerical data , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...