Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.393
Filter
1.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1366908, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725449

ABSTRACT

Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel non-invasive and comprehensive technique for etiological diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, its practical significance has been seldom reported in the context of hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia, a unique patient group characterized by neutropenia and compromised immune responses. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the results of plasma cfDNA sequencing in 164 hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia. We assessed the diagnostic efficacy and clinical impact of mNGS, comparing it with conventional microbiological tests. Results: mNGS identified 68 different pathogens in 111 patients, whereas conventional methods detected only 17 pathogen types in 36 patients. mNGS exhibited a significantly higher positive detection rate than conventional methods (67.7% vs. 22.0%, P < 0.001). This improvement was consistent across bacterial (30.5% vs. 9.1%), fungal (19.5% vs. 4.3%), and viral (37.2% vs. 9.1%) infections (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The anti-infective treatment strategies were adjusted for 51.2% (84/164) of the patients based on the mNGS results. Conclusions: mNGS of plasma cfDNA offers substantial promise for the early detection of pathogens and the timely optimization of anti-infective therapies in hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Metagenomics , Humans , Metagenomics/methods , Male , Retrospective Studies , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Febrile Neutropenia/microbiology , Febrile Neutropenia/blood , Febrile Neutropenia/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/microbiology , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/virology
2.
Andes Pediatr ; 95(2): 143-150, 2024 Apr.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801361

ABSTRACT

Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer and episodes of high-risk febrile neutropenia (HRFN). OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency of microorganisms isolated from blood cultures (BC) and their antimicrobial resistance (R) profile in children with HRFN, compared with the same data from previous studies of the same group. METHOD: Prospective, multicenter, epidemiological surveillance study of microorganisms isolated from BC in patients under 18 years of age, from 7 PINDA network hospitals, between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: 284 episodes of HRFN with positive BC were analyzed out of 1091 enrolled episodes (26%). Median age 7.2 years [3.0-12.3]. The main isolates were gram-negative bacilli (GNB) 49.2%, gram-positive cocci (GPC) 43.8%, and fungi 3.6%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were viridans group Streptococci (VGS) (25.8%), Escherichia coli (19.8%), Pseudomonas spp. (11.2%), Klebsiella spp. (10.9%), and coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) (10.9%). There was an increase in R to third-generation cephalosporins (p = 0.011) in GNB and to oxacillin in CoNS (p = 0.00), as well as a decrease in R to amikacin in non-fermenting GNB (p = 0.02) and to penicillin in VGS (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: VGS is the main agent isolated in BC from pediatric patients with cancer and episodes of HRFN, followed by E. coli, Pseudomonas spp., and Klebsiella spp. Having epidemiological surveillance of microorganisms isolated from BC and their antimicrobial R profile is essential to favor the rational use of antimicrobials.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , Blood Culture , Febrile Neutropenia , Neoplasms , Humans , Child , Neoplasms/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Febrile Neutropenia/microbiology , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Chile/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Female , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Adolescent , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects
3.
J Infect ; 88(6): 106171, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697268

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ECIL-2021 recommends discontinuing empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT) in febrile-neutropenic children after 72 h of treatment and at least 24-48 h of apyrexia in the case of fever of unknown origin (FUO). These guidelines are rarely applied to high-risk children's neutropenia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively included all consecutive FUO episodes occurring during profound neutropenia ≥ 10 days in children in our institution. We evaluated the safety of EAT discontinuation in patients for whom the ECIL guidelines were followed compared to those for whom they didn't. We used a combined criterion of mortality and intensive care unit admission at 30 days. We identified risk factors for recurrent fever after EAT discontinuation. RESULTS: Fifty-one FUO episodes occurred in 37 patients. EAT discontinuation followed ECIL guidelines in 19 (37 %) episodes. No deaths and-or transfers in ICU occurred in the ECIL group. The duration of EAT was shorter by nine days in the group following ECIL guidelines (p < 0.001). We observed 14 (27 %) episodes of recurrent fever. Mucositis was significantly associated with recurrent fever (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: EAT discontinuation seems feasible and safe in FUO during prolonged febrile neutropenia in children. However, mucosal lesions should prompt thorough surveillance due to the risk of recurrent fever.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Fever of Unknown Origin , Neutropenia , Humans , Fever of Unknown Origin/drug therapy , Fever of Unknown Origin/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Child , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child, Preschool , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Adolescent , Risk Factors , Infant , Febrile Neutropenia
4.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(6): 700-705, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696053

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia represents a critical oncologic emergency, and its management is pivotal in cancer therapy. In several guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is not routinely recommended except in high-risk cases. The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF, incorporating a systematic review to address this clinical question. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted by performing a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web, focusing on publications from January 1990 to December 2019. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort and case-control studies. Evaluated outcomes included overall survival, infection-related mortality, hospitalization duration, quality of life, and pain. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 332 records. Following two rounds of screening, two records were selected for both qualitative and quantitative synthesis including meta-analysis. Regarding infection-related mortality, the event to case ratio was 5:134 (3.73%) in the G-CSF group versus 6:129 (4.65%) in the non-G-CSF group, resulting in a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.58; p = 0.54), which was not statistically significant. Only median values for hospitalization duration were available from the two RCTs, precluding a meta-analysis. For overall survival, quality of life, and pain, no suitable studies were found for analysis, rendering their assessment unfeasible. CONCLUSION: A weak recommendation is made that G-CSF treatment not be administered to patients with febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. G-CSF treatment can be considered for patients at high risk.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Humans , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Japan , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Medical Oncology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
5.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(6): 681-688, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649648

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUD: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days. METHODS: This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes. RESULTS: Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/µL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Polyethylene Glycols , Humans , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Recombinant Proteins
6.
Mycoses ; 67(4): e13722, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two approaches are used to manage invasive fungal disease (IFD) in febrile neutropenic patients viz. empirical therapy (without attempting to confirm the diagnosis), or pre-emptive therapy (after screening tests for IFD). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was undertaken to compare these approaches in children. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinical Trial Registries and grey literature, for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with FN suspected to have IFD. We used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for quality assessment, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 7989 citations. Stepwise screening identified only one relevant RCT that administered empirical (n = 73) or pre-emptive (n = 76) antifungal therapy. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.46, 5.31), IFD mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI:0.15, 7.20) and other clinically important outcomes such as duration of fever, duration of hospitalization and proportion requiring ICU admission. There were no safety data reported. The number of days of antifungal therapy was significantly lower in the pre-emptive therapy arm. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was 'moderate'. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlighted the paucity of data, comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with febrile neutropenia having suspected invasive fungal disease. Data from a single included trial suggests that both approaches may be comparable in research settings. Robust trials are warranted to address the gap in existing knowledge about the optimal approach in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents , Febrile Neutropenia , Invasive Fungal Infections , Child , Humans , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Hospitalization , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/prevention & control
7.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 51(2): 149-152, 2024 Feb.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449400

ABSTRACT

Febrile neutropenia(FN)causes a prolonged treatment schedule and decreased relative dose intensity(RDI)during cancer chemotherapy, which adversely affects prognosis. In recent years, dose-dense(dd)chemotherapy has been used as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer based on the results of improved disease-free survival according to meta-analysis data. Regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, taxanes and trastuzumab with the addition of pertuzumab have shown higher pathological complete response rates and elevated incidences of FN. One hundred seventy-six patients received pegfilgrastim(PEG)prophylaxis between January 2011 and January 2023. Until 2019, the median day of PEG prophylaxis was day 4 from chemotherapy completion(days 2- 3, 14 cases; day 4, 41 cases; and day 5, 8 cases)with antibiotic prophylaxis in 58 patients(92%). FN was observed in 19 cases(30%). The RDIs of TC and FEC were 96.8% and 96.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the median day of PEG prophylaxis after 2020 was day 2 from chemotherapy completion(days 2-3, 108 cases; day 4, 4 cases; and day 5, 1 case)without antibiotic prophylaxis. FN was not observed in any of the cases. The RDI of all regimens was 99.7%. Although there were some differences in chemotherapy regimens, an earlier timing of PEG prophylaxis(especially 24-48 hours from chemotherapy completion)has been shown to reduce the incidence of FN and increase the RDI.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Febrile Neutropenia , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Filgrastim/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols , Meta-Analysis as Topic
8.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(5): 545-550, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517658

ABSTRACT

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) decreases the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, dose reduction or withdrawal is often preferred in the management of adverse events in the treatment of urothelial cancer. It is also important to maintain therapeutic intensity in order to control disease progression and thereby relieve symptoms, such as hematuria, infection, bleeding, and pain, as well as to prolong the survival. In this clinical question, we compared treatment with primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF to maintain therapeutic intensity with conventional standard therapy without G-CSF and examined the benefits and risks as major outcomes. A detailed literature search for relevant studies was performed using PubMed, Ichu-shi Web, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted and evaluated independently by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of the pooled data was performed, and the risk ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated and summarized in a meta-analysis. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, two of which were reviewed in the meta-analysis of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy, and one randomized controlled study showed a reduction in the incidence of FN. Primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF may be beneficial, as shown in a randomized controlled study of dose-dense MVAC therapy. However, there are no studies on other regimens, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen (dose-dense MVAC).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinblastine/therapeutic use , Vinblastine/adverse effects
9.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(2): 235-242, 2024 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484344

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with severe neutropenia who develop septic shock (SS) have high mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and mortality of SS in patients with HM and febrile neutropenia. METHODOLOGY: We included all patients with hematological malignancies (HM) who presented fever and severe neutropenia, admitted to an oncological tertiary care center in Mexico City for one year. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two episodes of fever and severe neutropenia were documented; 68 patients (23.2%) developed SS. Documented clinical infection was different between SS and non-SS patients (94.1% vs. 63.4%, p < 0.001); pneumonia was the most frequent infection (36.8% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.02). Also, in SS vs. non-SS, there were more positive cultures (69.1% vs. 38.4%, p < 0.001), higher frequency of Gram-negative bacteria (89.3% vs. 63.9%, p < 0.001), particularly Escherichia coli (68% vs. 44.2%) and Klebsiella spp. (23.4% vs. 15.1%). There were no differences when multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms were compared. In the multivariate analysis, associated risk factors for SS were: prolonged neutropenia, a documented site of infection, and having received highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Risk factors for mortality at 30 days were: older patients, prolonged neutropenia, and SS. CONCLUSIONS: Severe and prolonged neutropenia was associated with SS development and mortality at 30 days. ICU management should be offered to all critically ill patients with HM if long-term survival of the underlying malignancy is expected.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Hematologic Neoplasms , Neoplasms , Shock, Septic , Humans , Shock, Septic/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Risk Factors , Escherichia coli , Febrile Neutropenia/microbiology , Retrospective Studies
10.
Turk J Pediatr ; 66(1): 90-98, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523383

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We assessed the relationship between sepsis occurrence and the serum levels of angiopoietin (Ang-1, Ang-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) in pediatric patients with cancer-related febrile neutropenia. METHODS: Fifty-two children with malignant tumors who experienced 86 episodes of febrile neutropenia (FN) were examined between June 2016 and June 2018. Each FN episode was considered a separate event and the total number of FNs were recorded (86 FN episodes = FN group). The control group consisted of 21 healthy children. Ang-1, Ang-2, VEGF-A and sFlt-1 were measured at the baseline and 48th hour of each FN episode -alongside routine characterization of inflammation (C-reactive protein; white blood cell and absolute neutrophil count). RESULTS: Among the episodes, 29 (34.5%) developed sepsis while 57 were classified as non-complicated FN. The baseline values of patients and controls were significantly different for Ang-1, Ang-2, VEGF and sFlt-1 values (all, p < 0.05). In the subgroup with sepsis, Ang-2 values were higher than in the subgroup without sepsis (p = 0.017). In predicting sepsis, Ang-2 had 60.7% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity at the 74.6 cut-off value (AUC: 0.662 [95%CI: 0.541 - 0.783], p = 0.022), Ang-2 / Ang-1 ratio had 65.5% sensitivity and 60.0% specificity at the 0.405 cut-off value (AUC: 0.633 [95%CI: 0.513 - 0.753], p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that Ang-2 and Ang-2/Ang-1 were higher in the sepsis group and Ang-2 might be a biomarker to indicate the risk of sepsis in patients with FN and/or cancer.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Neoplasms , Sepsis , Humans , Child , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Cytokines , Sepsis/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Fever/complications
11.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5504, 2024 03 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448687

ABSTRACT

The gut microbiota of paediatric oncology patients undergoing a conditioning regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is recently considered to play role in febrile neutropenia. Disruption of commensal microbiota and evolution of opportune pathogens community carrying a plethora of antibiotic-resistance genes play crucial role. However, the impact, predictive role and association of patient´s gut resistome in the course of the therapy is still to be elucidated. We analysed gut microbiota composition and resistome of 18 paediatric oncology patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, including 12 patients developing febrile neutropenia, hospitalized at The Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of the National Institute of Children´s disease in Slovak Republic and healthy individuals (n = 14). Gut microbiome of stool samples obtained in 3 time points, before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n = 16), one week after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n = 16) and four weeks after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n = 14) was investigated using shotgun metagenome sequencing and bioinformatical analysis. We identified significant decrease in alpha-diversity and nine antibiotic-resistance genes msr(C), dfrG, erm(T), VanHAX, erm(B), aac(6)-aph(2), aph(3)-III, ant(6)-Ia and aac(6)-Ii, one week after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation associated with febrile neutropenia. Multidrug-resistant opportune pathogens of ESKAPE, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli found in the gut carried the significant subset of patient's resistome. Over 50% of patients treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin carried antibiotic-resistance genes to applied treatment. The alpha diversity and the resistome of gut microbiota one week after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is relevant predictor of febrile neutropenia outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Furthermore, the interindividual diversity of multi-drug resistant opportunistic pathogens with variable portfolios of antibiotic-resistance genes indicates necessity of preventive, personalized approach.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Neoplasms , Child , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Biomarkers , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli
12.
Cancer Med ; 13(6): e7106, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506249

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes are low risk (LR) for severe outcomes and can safely receive less aggressive management and early hospital discharge. Validated risk tools are recommended by the Children's Oncology Group to identify LR FN episodes. However, the complex dynamics of early hospital discharge and burdens faced by caregivers associated with the FN episode have been inadequately described. METHODS: An adapted quality-of-life (QoL) survey instrument was administered by a convergent mixed methods design; qualitative and quantitative data from two sources, the medical record and the mixed methods survey instrument, were independently analyzed prior to linkage and integration. Code book was informed by conceptual framework; open coding was used. Mixed methods analysis used joint display of results to determine meta-inferences. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patient-caregiver dyads participated with a response rate of 87%. Of the 27 FN episodes, 51.8% (14/27) were LR and 40.7% (11/27) had an early hospital discharge. The LR and early hospital discharge groups had higher mean QoL scores comparatively. Meta-inferences are reciprocal influencers and expand the complex situation; FN negatively affects the entire family, and the benefits of hospital management were outweighed by risks and worsened symptoms, so an individualized approach to management and care at home was preferred. CONCLUSION: Early discharge of LR FN episodes positively impacts QoL, yet risk-stratified management for FN is intricately complex. Optimal FN management should prioritize the patient's overall health; shared decision-making is recommended and can improve care delivery. These results should be confirmed in a larger, more heterogeneous population.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Neoplasms , Child , Humans , Quality of Life , Patient Discharge , Hospitals , Febrile Neutropenia/etiology , Febrile Neutropenia/therapy , Neoplasms/complications
13.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 23(1): 16, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360651

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines about febrile neutropenia in paediatric patients are not homogeneous; the best empiric treatment of this condition should be driven by local epidemiology. The Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) addresses the need for disease-specific local susceptibility evidence that could guide empiric antibiotic prescriptions based on outcome estimates of treatment regimens obtained as a weighted average of pathogen susceptibilities. This study developed a WISCA model to inform empirical antibiotic regimen selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes in onco-haematological paediatric patients treated at two Italian paediatric tertiary centres. METHODS: We included blood cultures from patients with a bloodstream infection and neutropenia admitted to the Paediatric Haematology-Oncology wards in Padua and Genoa Hospitals from 2016 to 2021. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of 20 antibiotics as monotherapy and of 21 combined regimens with a Bayesian probability distribution. RESULTS: We collected 350 blood cultures, including 196 g-negative and 154 g-positive bacteria. Considering the most used antibiotic combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin, the median coverage for the pool of bacteria collected in the study was 78%. When adding a glycopeptide, the median coverage increased to 89%, while the replacement of piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem did not provide benefits. The developed WISCAs showed that no monotherapy offered an adequate coverage rate for the identified pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The application of WISCA offers the possibility of maximizing the clinical utility of microbiological surveillance data derived from large hospitals to inform the choice of the best empiric treatment while contributing to spare broad-spectrum antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Febrile Neutropenia , Humans , Child , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Bayes Theorem , Hospitals, Pediatric , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Bacteria , Italy , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy
14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 3816, 2024 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360906

ABSTRACT

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Febrile Neutropenia , Filgrastim , Leukopenia , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/etiology , Ramucirumab , Docetaxel , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Leukopenia/chemically induced , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use
15.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(7): 642-645, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Control of bacterial and fungal infections is critical to improving outcomes in hematological neoplastic diseases of children and adolescents. In this study, a retrospective analysis of our previous studies on febrile neutropenia was performed to investigate bacteremia. PROCEDURE: From August 2008 to December 2023, five antibiotic studies were performed for febrile and neutropenic pediatric patients who had been treated with chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy, or had received stem cell transplantation in the pediatric unit at Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital. The rate of positive blood culture, detected bacteria, and susceptibility of several types of antibiotics in febrile episodes were investigated. RESULTS: Blood culture was positive in 133 of 1604 febrile episodes of 329 patients. Detected bacteria were Gram-positive cocci (61.2 %), Gram-negative bacilli (27.6 %), Gram-negative cocci (0.7 %), and Gram-positive bacilli (10.4 %). The incidence of bacteremia over time showed a decreasing trend with each passing year. In particular, the incidence of bacteremia was around 10 % in 2008-2013, whereas it was often below 5 % after 2020; this decrease was statistically significant. Although almost all detected bacteria and their susceptibilities to antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, and cefozopran) did not change over time, all Escherichia coli detected after 2014 were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing bacteria.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia , Febrile Neutropenia , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Child , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Febrile Neutropenia/microbiology , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Infant , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Incidence
16.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(5): 2155-2162, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38367066

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between interleukin-33 (IL-33) and its receptor Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) levels and bacterial infections during febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this prospective, case-control study, participants were divided into 3 groups: ALL patients with FN (Group A), ALL patients without neutropenia and fever (Group B), and healthy children without infection and chronic disease (Group C). There were 30 cases in each group. Blood samples for IL-33 and sST2 have been drawn from patients in Group A before the initiation of treatment and on days 1 and 5 of treatment, and from patients in Groups B and C at initiation. At admission, mean IL-33 level (39.02 ± 26.40 ng/L) in Group B and mean sST2 level (185.3 ± 371.49 ng/ml) in Group A were significantly higher than the other groups (p = 0.038, p < 0.001, respectively). No difference was observed in the mean IL-33 and sST2 levels in the 5-day follow-up of patients in Group A (p = 0.82, p = 0.86, respectively). IL-33 and sST2 levels were not associated with fever duration, neutropenia duration or length of hospitalization. While C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in patients with positive blood culture (p = 0.021), IL-33 (p = 0.49) and sST2 (p = 0.21) levels were not associated with culture positivity.  Conclusion: IL-33 and sST2 levels were not found valuable as diagnostic and prognostic markers to predict bacterial sepsis in patients with FN. What is Known: • Neutropenic patients are at high risk of serious bacterial and viral infections, but the admission symptom is often only fever. • Febrile neutropenia has a high mortality rate if not treated effectively. What is New: • Febrile neutropenia is not only caused by bacterial infections. Therefore, new biomarkers should be identified to prevent overuse of antibiotics. • Specific biomarkers are needed to diagnose bacterial sepsis in the early phase of febrile neutropenia.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Febrile Neutropenia , Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein , Interleukin-33 , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Humans , Interleukin-33/blood , Female , Male , Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein/blood , Child , Prospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Febrile Neutropenia/blood , Febrile Neutropenia/etiology , Febrile Neutropenia/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/blood , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/complications , Adolescent , Infant , Bacterial Infections/blood , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis
17.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(3): 388-399, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423051

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pivekimab sunirine (IMGN632) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate comprising a high-affinity CD123 antibody, cleavable linker, and novel indolinobenzodiazepine pseudodimer payload. CD123 is overexpressed in several haematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukaemia. We present clinical data on pivekimab sunirine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS: This first-in-human, phase 1/2 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study enrolled participants aged 18 years or older at nine hospitals in France, Italy, Spain, and the USA with CD123+ haematological malignancies (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1); participants reported here were in a cohort of participants with acute myeloid leukaemia who were refractory to or had relapsed on one or more previous treatments for acute myeloid leukaemia. The 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase evaluated two dosing schedules: schedule A (once every 3 weeks, on day 1 of a 3-week cycle) and fractionated schedule B (days 1, 4, and 8 of a 3-week cycle). The dose-expansion phase evaluated two cohorts: one cohort given 0·045 mg/kg of bodyweight (schedule A) and one cohort given 0·090 mg/kg of bodyweight (schedule A). The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose. Antileukaemia activity (overall response and a composite complete remission assessment) was a secondary endpoint. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03386513. FINDINGS: Between Dec 29, 2017, and May 27, 2020, 91 participants were enrolled (schedule A, n=68; schedule B, n=23). 30 (44%) of schedule A participants were female and 38 (56%) were male; 60 (88%) were White, six (9%) were Black or African American, and two (3%) were other races. Pivekimab sunirine at doses of 0·015 mg/kg to 0·450 mg/kg in schedule A was administered in six escalating doses with no maximum tolerated dose defined; three dose-limiting toxicities were observed (reversible veno-occlusive disease; 0·180 mg/kg, n=1 and 0·450 mg/kg, n=1; and neutropenia; 0·300 mg/kg, n=1). Schedule B was not pursued further on the basis of comparative safety and antileukaemia findings with schedule A. The recommended phase 2 dose was selected as 0·045 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. At the recommended phase 2 dose (n=29), the most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (three [10%]), infusion-related reactions (two [7%]), and anaemia (two [7%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurring in 5% or more of participants treated at the recommended phase 2 dose were febrile neutropenia (two [7%]) and infusion-related reactions (two [7%]). Among 68 participants who received schedule A, one death (1%) was considered to be treatment-related (cause unknown; 0·300 mg/kg cohort). At the recommended phase 2 dose, the overall response rate was 21% (95% CI 8-40; six of 29) and the composite complete remission rate was 17% (95% CI 6-36; five of 29). INTERPRETATION: Pivekimab sunirine showed single-agent activity across multiple doses, with a recommended phase 2 dose of 0·045 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. These findings led to a phase 1b/2 study of pivekimab sunirine plus azacitidine and venetoclax in patients with CD123-positive acute myeloid leukaemia. FUNDING: ImmunoGen.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Febrile Neutropenia , Hematologic Neoplasms , Immunoconjugates , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Female , Male , Immunoconjugates/adverse effects , Interleukin-3 Receptor alpha Subunit , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy
18.
Invest New Drugs ; 42(1): 136-144, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Part E of the KEYNOTE-011 (NCT01840579) study assessed the safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in Japanese patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: Patients received 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks in combination with cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2; days 1, 2, 3) in cohort 1; with carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min) and etoposide (100 mg/m2; days 1, 2, 3) in cohort 2; or with cisplatin/etoposide and pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg; cycle 1, day 4) in cohort 3. Combination therapy was followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy (31 cycles). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability (including dose-limiting toxicities; DLTs). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the study (cohort 1, n = 6; cohort 2, n = 6; cohort 3, n = 3). Median time from treatment allocation to data cutoff was 22.1 months (range, 4.1‒32.4 months). DLTs occurred in 3 patients in cohort 1 (one patient with grade 4 laryngeal stenosis and grade 3 febrile neutropenia; two patients with grade 3 febrile neutropenia); no patients in cohorts 2 or 3 experienced DLTs. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (67%) and neutropenia (87%). Among all patients, ORR was 67% (95% CI, 38%‒88%) and median DOR was 4.5 months (range, 2.8‒28.8 months). Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0‒7.8 months) and median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 7.4‒25.9 months). CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-etoposide therapy had manageable toxicity with no new safety signals and was associated with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with ES-SCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01840579.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Febrile Neutropenia , Lung Neoplasms , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Etoposide/adverse effects , Platinum/therapeutic use , Japan , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(7): e36941, 2024 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363946

ABSTRACT

Single-center prospective cohort diagnostic accuracy study. Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS) in detecting pulmonary pathology in immunosuppressed patients. We conducted a single-center prospective study. Consecutive patients with febrile neutropenia who underwent CT (Computerized Tomography) underwent TUS evaluation within 24h of CT. Both studies were performed by an expert who was blinded to the clinical information and results of the alternative imaging modalities. 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 39.9 years (±17 standard deviation). TUS as a diagnostic test had a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 83.3%, negative predictive value of 71.4%, and positive predictive value of 96.3%. Substantial between-method agreement was demonstrated with a kappa of 0.71 (P = .001) between the TUS and chest CT findings. We obtained a kappa of 1 (P = .001) for the final diagnosis of Pleural Effusion (PE). We concluded that TUS is a promising screening test for immunocompromised individuals. The results showed good diagnostic performance of TUS compared to CT for the detection of pulmonary findings highly suggestive of pathology with high accuracy and reproducibility.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Point-of-Care Systems , Humans , Adult , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(2): e14236, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349035

ABSTRACT

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is common among hematologic malignancy patients, including recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy. Prompt empiric antibiotic use has been the mainstay for decades but a "one-size-fits-all" approach is no longer broadly accepted, as treatment-related infectious risk are more understood. Growing antimicrobial resistance is an increasing clinical challenge. Evolving strategies on de-escalation of broad-spectrum antibiotics in FN without identified infection are areas of particular interest.


Subject(s)
Febrile Neutropenia , Hematologic Neoplasms , Infections , Humans , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Infections/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...