[National competitive bidding analysis of osteosynthesis materials in pediatric patients with femur fractures]. / Análisis de licitación pública nacional de materiales de osteosíntesis en los pacientes pediátricos con fracturas de fémur.

INTRODUCTION: health promotion policy requires the identification of barriers to the adoption of public policies. Paraguay's national healthcare system is inequitable, expensive, and inefficient. The Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare (MSPyBS) is the entity responsible for covering the needs of a significant portion of the population. In January 2022, the MSPyBS financed the purchase of titanium elastic nails through a National Public Tender for Osteosynthesis Materials (LPN 02/22) to provide them for free in the pediatric service. Using research as a tool, we seek to analyze the impact of the implementation of LPN 02/22 at the Trauma Hospital, believing that this action would help streamline administrative and bureaucratic processes, making them more efficient with the assistance of the hospital's human resources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective, analytical, and comparative study conducted at a high-complexity trauma center in Asunción, Paraguay. Patients aged 4 to 14 years with an indication for stabilization with elastic nails were included. Demographic data, the mechanism of injury, time elapsed from hospital arrival to surgical treatment, length of hospital stay, and the average hospital cost were analyzed based on the daily expense of pediatric patient hospitalization. RESULTS: 52 patients, divided into 25 cases in 2021 before implementation and 27 cases after implementation. The time elapsed from hospital arrival to definitive treatment was six days in the pre-implementation period, with an average stay from admission to discharge of 7.4 days. After implementation, the time from hospital arrival to definitive treatment was 4.3 days, and the average discharge time for the Post group was six days. The potential savings per patient amount to 332 dollars, offset by the institution's implant supply cost of 197 dollars, resulting in an approximate savings of 135 dollars per patient for the ministry. CONCLUSIONS: we view the implementation of free titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fracture patients positively. We encourage the institution to continue with similar policies and strive to achieve even greater benefits for users.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la política de promoción de la salud requiere la identificación de los obstáculos para la adopción de políticas públicas. El sistema nacional de salud de Paraguay es inequitativo, caro e ineficiente. El Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social (MSPyBS) es el ente que cubre las necesidades de gran parte de la población. El MSPyBS en Enero del 2022 financió, mediante la Licitación Pública Nacional de Materiales de Osteosíntesis (LPN 02/22), la compra de clavos elásticos de titanio para disponer de su uso gratuito en el Servicio de Pediatría; usando a la investigación como herramienta, buscamos analizar el impacto de la implementación de la LPN 02/22 en el Hospital de Trauma, creyendo que esta acción ayudaría a dinamizar los procesos administrativos y burocráticos, haciéndolos más eficientes con la ayuda de los recursos humanos del hospital. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio retrospectivo, analítico y comparativo, realizado en un centro de trauma de alta complejidad de Asunción, Paraguay. Fueron incluidos los pacientes con edad comprendidas entre cuatro y 14 años, con indicación de estabilización con clavos elásticos. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, el mecanismo de trauma, el tiempo transcurrido desde la llegada al hospital hasta el tratamiento quirúrgico, así como el tiempo de estadía hospitalaria. Se evaluó el costo hospitalario promedio, basados en el gasto diario de la internación de un paciente pediátrico. RESULTADOS: cincuenta y dos pacientes, separados en 25 casos en el 2021 previo a la implementación y 27 casos posterior a la implementación. El tiempo transcurrido desde la llegada al hospital hasta el tratamiento definitivo fue de seis días para la etapa previa a la implementación; el promedio desde el ingreso hasta el alta fue de 7.4 días. Desde la implementación se tuvo un transcurso de 4.3 días desde la llegada al hospital hasta el tratamiento definitivo. El egreso del grupo Post tuvo un promedio de seis días. El ahorro probable en relación con cada paciente es de 332 dólares; a esto debemos contrarrestar el monto que paga la institución para la provisión del implante (197 dólares), por lo que el ahorro del ministerio sería de aproximadamente 135 dólares por cada paciente. CONCLUSIONES: vemos como positiva la implementación de la gratuidad de los clavos elásticos de titanio en los pacientes en edad pediátrica con fractura de fémur. Alentamos a la institución a seguir con políticas similares y tratar de lograr mayores beneficios para los usuarios.

Lactic acid levels are associated with morbidity, length of stay, and total treatment costs in urban trauma patients with lower extremity long bone fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Lactic acid is well studied in the trauma population and is frequently used as a laboratory indicator that correlates with resuscitation status and has thus been associated with patient outcomes. There is limited literature that assesses the association of initial lactic acid with post-operative morbidity and hospitalization costs in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of lactic acid levels and alcohol levels post-operative morbidity, length of stay and admission costs in a cohort of operative lower extremity long bone fractures, and to compare these effects in the ballistic and blunt trauma sub-population. METHODS: Patients presenting as trauma activations who underwent tibial and/or femoral fixation at a single institution from May 2018 to August 2020 were divided based on initial lactate level into normal, (< 2.5) intermediate (2.5-4.0), and high (> 4.0). Mechanism of trauma (blunt vs. ballistic) was also stratified for analysis. Data on other injuries, surgical timing, level of care, direct hospitalization costs, length of stay, and discharge disposition were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome assessed was post-operative morbidity defined as in-hospital mortality or unanticipated escalation of care. Secondary outcomes included hospital costs, lengths of stay, and discharge disposition. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients met inclusions criteria. Average age was 34.1 ± 13.0 years old, with patients remaining hospitalized for 8.8 ± 9.5 days, and 35.2% requiring ICU care during their hospitalization. Patients in the ballistic cohort were younger, had fewer other injuries and had higher lactate levels (4.0 ± 2.4) than in the blunt trauma cohort (3.4 ± 1.9) (p = 0.004). On multivariate regression, higher lactate was associated with post-operative morbidity (p = 0.015), as was age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.033). ISS, ballistic versus blunt injury mechanism, and other included laboratory markers were not. Lactate was also associated with longer lengths of stay, and higher associated direct hospitalization cost (p < 0.001) and lower rates of home disposition (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: High initial lactate levels are independently associated with post-operative morbidity as well as higher direct hospitalization costs and longer lengths of stay in orthopedic trauma patients who underwent fixation for fractures of the lower extremity long bones. Ballistic trauma patients had significantly higher lactate levels compared to the blunt cohort, and lactate was not independently associated with increased rates of post-operative morbidity in the ballistic cohort alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Are Femoral Stems in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Cost Effective in High Fracture Risk Patients? A Risk Model and Cost Analysis.

Femoral stemmed total knee arthroplasty (FS TKA) may be used in patients deemed higher risk for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) to reduce PPF risk. However, the cost effectiveness of FS TKA has not been defined. Using a risk modeling analysis, we investigate the cost effectiveness of FS in primary TKA compared with the implant cost of revision to distal femoral replacement (DFR) following PPF. A model of risk categories was created representing patients at increasing fracture risk, ranging from 2.5 to 30%. The number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for each risk category, which was multiplied by the increased cost of FS TKA and compared with the cost of DFR. The 50th percentile implant pricing data for primary TKA, FS TKA, and DFR were identified and used for the analysis. FS TKA resulted in an increased cost of $2,717.83, compared with the increased implant cost of DFR of $27,222.29. At 50% relative risk reduction with FS TKA, the NNT for risk categories of 2.5, 10, 20, and 30% were 80, 20, 10, and 6.67, respectively. At 20% risk, FS TKA times NNT equaled $27,178.30. A 10% absolute risk reduction in fracture risk obtained with FS TKA is needed to achieve cost neutrality with DFR. FS TKA is not cost effective for low fracture risk patients but may be cost effective for patients with fracture risk more than 20%. Further study is needed to better define the quantifiable risk reduction achieved in using FS TKA and identify high-risk PPF patients.

Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures Treated with Arthroplasty Are Associated with Lower Mortality but Greater Costs Compared with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation at 30 Days.

Distal femur fractures (DFFs) are common injuries with significant morbidity. Surgical options include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and/or intramedullary devices or a distal femur endoprosthesis (distal femur replacement [DFR]). A paucity of studies exist that compare the two modalities. The present study utilized a 1:2 propensity score match to compare 30-day outcomes of geriatric patients with DFFs who underwent an ORIF or DFR. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2008 to 2019 were utilized to identify all patients who sustained a DFF and underwent either ORIF or DFR. This yielded 3,197 patients who underwent an ORIF versus 121 patients who underwent a DFR. A final sample of 363 patients (242 patients with ORIF vs. 121 with DFR) was obtained after a 1:2 propensity score match. Costs were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database using multiple regression analysis and validated with a 7:3 train-test algorithm. Independent samples t-tests and chi-square analysis were conducted to assess cost and outcome differences, respectively. Patients who received a DFR had higher transfusion rates than ORIF (p = 0.021) and higher mean inpatient hospital costs (p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis for patients 80 years of age or older revealed higher 30-day unplanned readmission (0 vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (0 vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) rates for patients undergoing ORIF compared with DFR. The total number of DFR cases needed to prevent one ORIF-related 30-day mortality for DFR for patients 80 years of age was 6 (95% confidence interval: 3.02-19.9). The mean hospital costs associated with preventing one case of death within 30 days from operation by undergoing DFR compared with ORIF was $176,021.39. Our results demonstrate higher rates of transfusion and increased inpatient costs among the DFR cohort compared with ORIF. However, we demonstrate lower rates of mortality for patients 80 years and older who underwent DFR versus ORIF. Future studies randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the results of this study.

The clinical and economic burden of proximal femur periprosthetic fractures.

BACKGROUND: The number of hip replacements is constantly and progressively increasing, resulting in an increase in periprosthetic fractures. The main aim of this study is to analyze costs and outcomes of surgical treatment for those fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on periprosthetic proximal femur fracture presented a single-level I trauma center. Medical records were reviewed in terms of demographic data, diagnosis (according to Vancouver classification), type of surgical treatment, hospitalization length and follow-up. Patients were interviewed about number of consultations after discharge, medications and physiotherapy sessions. Clinical outcome was evaluated with WOMAC score at the last follow-up, and patient health status was evaluated with the EQ5D5L score pre-trauma and at the last follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical treatment: reduction and internal fixation alone and revision plus fixation. A further group was also considered: patients underwent a Girdlestone procedure. Global costs for each group were calculated. RESULTS: We initially recruited 117 patients, 17 of them were lost at follow-up. Furthermore, 19 patients (19%) died during the follow-up, and 81 of them were therefore included in the study. Mean follow-up was 26.5 months. Mean postoperative WOMAC score was 39.44, and EQ5D5L score was 9.12 for the preoperative period and 12.35 at the last follow-up. A significant worsening of clinical conditions was found comparing the period before fracture to the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Quality of life after surgery resulted to be poor or fair in 40% of the patients at a mean follow-up of 26.5 months. No significant differences between groups were found according to patients' health status. Mean global costs for mayor surgeries were 18,822 Euros; mean costs for fixation alone were 17,298 Euros while for fixation and revision were 20,966 Euros, but no statistically difference was found between these two groups. Mean cost for Girdlestone group was 12,664 Euros. CONCLUSIONS: In proximal femur periprosthetic fractures, either fixation or revision plus fixation presents high costs but patients' postoperative quality of life is poor.

Definitive surgical femur fracture fixation in Northern Tanzania: implications of cost, payment method and payment status.

INTRODUCTION: Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) covers major orthopaedic trauma for a catchment population of 12.5 million people in northern Tanzania. Femur fractures, the most common traumatic orthopaedic injury at KCMC (39%), require open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for definitive treatment. It is unclear whether payment affects care. This study sought to explore associations of payment method with episodes of care for femur fracture ORIFs at KCMC. METHODS: we performed a retrospective review of orthopaedic records between February 2018 and July 2018. Patients with femur fracture ORIF were eligible; patients without charts were excluded. Ethical clearance was obtained from the KCMC ethics committee. Statistical analysis utilized descriptive statistics, Chi-squared and Fisher's exact Tests, and Student´s t-tests where appropriate. RESULTS: of 76 included patients, 17% (n=13) were insured, 83% (n=63) paid out-of-pocket, 11% (n=8) had unpaid balance, and 89% (n=68) fully paid. Average patient charge ($417) was 42% of per capita GDP ($998). Uninsured patients had higher bills ($429 vs $356; p=0.27) and were significantly more likely to pay an advance payment (95.2% vs 7.7%; p<0.001). Inpatient care was equivalent regardless of payment. Unpaid patients were less likely to receive follow-up (76.5% vs. 25%; p=0.006) and waited longer from injury to admission (31.5 vs 13.3 days; p<0.001), from admission to surgery (30.1 vs 11.1 days; p<0.001), and from surgery to discharge (18.4 vs 7.1 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: equal standard of care is provided to all patients. However, future efforts may decrease disparities in advance payment, timeliness, and follow-up.

Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi.

Background and purpose - In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST.Patients and methods - This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty.Results - Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71-0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer's perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective.Interpretation - IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources.

Characteristics and Hospital Costs of Spica Cast Treatment of Non-accidental-related Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures in Children Before Walking Age.

BACKGROUND: Fractures are one of the most common presentations of child abuse second only to soft tissue damage, with ∼60% of fractures being femur, humerus or tibia fractures. Although studies have shown increased health care costs associated with nonaccidental trauma (NAT), there is little data regarding the cost of NAT-associated fractures compared with accidental trauma (AT) related fractures. The purpose of this study was to consider the economic burden of NAT related femoral fractures compared with AT femoral fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of children under the age of one with femoral fractures treated with a spica cast at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center between 2007 and 2016. Variables included age, sex, length of hospital stay, and estimated total billing cost obtained from this hospital's billing department. In addition, fracture site (mid-shaft, distal, proximal, and subtrochanteric) and pattern were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty children with a mean age of 7 months were analyzed. NAT was suspected in 19 cases (31.7%) and confirmed in 9 (15%) before discharge. Two groups were analyzed: the NAT group included suspected and confirmed cases of abuse (28) and the AT group contained the remaining 32 cases. There was no significant difference in the demographics between these 2 groups. Children in NAT group had a longer length of stay compared with AT group (78.9 vs. 36.7 h, P<0.001). Overall consumer price index-adjusted hospital costs were $24,726 higher for NAT group compared with AT group (P=0.024), with costs of laboratory workup, radiology, and nonorthopaedic physician fees being the top 3 components contributing to the increased costs. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of NAT was 46.6% in children presenting with femoral fracture under 1 year of age. The overall hospital cost of treating fractures in the NAT group was 1.5 times higher than the AT group, with imaging charges the most significant contributor to cost difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective review.

Regionalization of Isolated Pediatric Femur Fracture Treatment: Recent Trends Observed Using the Kids' Inpatient Database.

BACKGROUND: Isolated pediatric femur fractures have historically been treated at local hospitals. Pediatric referral patterns have changed in recent years, diverting patients to high volume centers. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the treatment location of isolated pediatric femur fractures and concomitant trends in length of stay and cost of treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of surgical admissions for femoral shaft fracture was performed using the 2000 to 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database. The primary outcome was hospital location and teaching status. Secondary outcomes included the length of stay and mean hospital charges. Polytrauma patients were excluded. Data were weighted within each study year to produce national estimates. RESULTS: A total of 35,205 pediatric femoral fracture cases met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant shift in the treatment location over time. In 2000, 60.1% of fractures were treated at urban, teaching hospitals increasing to 81.8% in 2012 (P<0.001). Mean length of stay for all hospitals decreased from 2.59 to 1.91 days (P<0.001). Inflation-adjusted total charges increased during the study from $9499 in 2000 to $25,499 in 2012 per episode of treatment (P<0.001). Total charges per hospitalization were ∼$8000 greater at urban, teaching hospitals in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of isolated pediatric femoral fractures is regionalizing to urban, teaching hospitals. Length of stay has decreased across all institutions. However, the cost of treatment is significantly greater at urban institutions relative to rural hospitals. This trend does not consider patient outcomes but the observed pattern appears to have financial implications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-case series, database study.

Assessing the capacity of Malawi's district and central hospitals to manage traumatic diaphyseal femoral fractures in adults.

BACKGROUND: The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is growing worldwide, disproportionately affecting low-income countries like Malawi. However, resources required to manage musculoskeletal trauma remain inadequate. A detailed understanding of the current capacity of Malawian public hospitals to manage musculoskeletal trauma is unknown and necessary for effective trauma system development planning. METHODS: We developed a list of infrastructure, manpower, and material resources used during treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures-a representative injury managed non-operatively and operatively in Malawi. We identified, by consensus of at least 7 out of 10 experts, which items were essential at district and central hospitals. We surveyed orthopaedic providers in person at all 25 district and 4 central hospitals in Malawi on the presence, availability, and reasons for unavailability of essential resources. We validated survey responses by performing simultaneous independent on-site assessments of 25% of the hospitals. RESULTS: No district or central hospital in Malawi had available all the essential resources to adequately manage femoral fractures. On average, district hospitals had 71% (range 41-90%) of essential resources, with at least 15 of 25 reporting unavailability of inpatient ward nurses, x-ray, external fixators, gauze and bandages, and walking assistive devices. District hospitals offered only non-operative treatment, though 24/25 reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Central hospitals reported an average of 76% (71-85%) of essential resources, with at least 2 of 4 hospitals reporting unavailability of full blood count, inpatient hospital beds, a procedure room, an operating room, casualty/A&E department clinicians, orthopaedic clinicians, a circulating nurse, inpatient ward nurses, electrocardiograms, x-ray, suture, and walking assistive devices. All four central hospitals reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Operative treatment of femur fracture with a reliable supply of implants was available at 3/4 hospitals, though 2/3 were dependent entirely on foreign donations. CONCLUSION: We identified critical deficiencies in infrastructure, manpower, and essential resources at district and central hospitals in Malawi. Our findings provide evidence-based guidance on how to improve the musculoskeletal trauma system in Malawi, by identifying where and why essential resources were unavailable when needed.

The burden of femoral shaft fractures in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Road traffic injuries disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and are associated with femur fractures that lead to long-term disability. Information about these injuries is crucial for appropriate healthcare resource allocation. The purpose of this study is to estimate the incidence of femoral shaft fractures in Tanzania and describe the unmet surgical burden. METHODS: Study sites included six government hospitals across Tanzania. Investigators collected data from hospital admission and procedural logbooks to estimate femoral shaft fracture incidence and their treatment methods. Semi-quantitative interviews were conducted with relevant hospital personnel to validate estimates obtained from hospital records. Investigators gathered road traffic incident (RTI) statistics from national police reports and calculated femur fracture:RTI ratios. RESULTS: Femoral shaft fracture annual incidence rate ranged from 2.1 to 18.4 per 100,000 people. Median low and high femur fracture:RTI ratio were 0.54 and 0.73, respectively. At smaller hospitals, many patients (5-25%) were treated with traction, and a majority (70-90%) are referred to other centers. Barriers to surgery at each hospital include a lack of surgical implants, equipment, and personnel. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate is similar to previous estimations, and it is consistent with an increased femoral shaft fracture incidence in Tanzania when compared to higher income countries. The femur fracture:RTI ratio may be a valid tool for estimating femur fracture incidence rates. There is an unmet orthopaedic surgical burden for femur fractures treatment at rural hospitals in Tanzania, and the barriers to treatment could be targets for future interventions.

The Cost of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Skeletal Traction for Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Malawi: A Prospective Economic Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In many low- and middle-income countries, non-surgical management of femoral shaft fractures using skeletal traction is common because intramedullary (IM) nailing is perceived to be expensive. This study assessed the cost of IM nailing and skeletal traction for treatment of femoral shaft fractures in Malawi. METHODS: We used micro-costing methods to quantify the costs associated with IM nailing and skeletal traction. Adult patients who sustained an isolated closed femur shaft fracture and managed at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Malawi were followed from admission to discharge. Resource utilization and time data were collected through direct observation. Costs were quantified for procedures and ward personnel, medications, investigations, surgical implants, disposable supplies, procedures instruments and overhead. RESULTS: We followed 38 nailing and 27 traction patients admitted between April 2016 and November 2017. Nailing patient's average length of stay (LOS) was 36.35 days (SD 21.19), compared to 61 (SD 18.16) for traction (p = 0.0003). The total cost per patient was $596.97 ($168.81) for nailing and $678.02 (SD $144.25) for traction (p = 0.02). Major cost drivers were ward personnel and overhead; both are directly proportional to LOS. Converting patients from traction to nailing is cost-saving up to day 23 post-admission. CONCLUSION: Savings from IM nailing as compared with skeletal traction were achieved by shortened LOS. Although this study did not assess the effectiveness of either intervention, the literature suggests that traction carries a higher rate of complications than nailing. Investment in IM nailing capacity may yield substantial net savings to health systems, as well as improved clinical outcomes.

Financial Analysis of Closed Femur Fractures in 3- to 6-Year-Olds Treated With Immediate Spica Casting Versus Intramedullary Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Health care in America continues to place more importance on providing value-based medicine. Medicare reimbursements are increasingly being tied to this and future policy changes are expected to reinforce these trends. Recent literature has shown pediatric femur fractures in preschool-age children have equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes when treated with spica casting or flexible intramedullary nails (IMN). We compared hospital care statistics including charges for nonoperative versus operative treatment for closed femur fractures in 3- to 6-year-olds. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed of 73 consecutive 3- to 6-year-olds treated at a regional level 1 pediatric hospital from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 with an isolated, closed femoral shaft fracture. Exclusion criteria included open fractures, bilateral injury, and polytrauma. Immediate spica casting was performed in the Emergency Department or Anesthesia Procedure Unit versus IMN in the operating room. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were treated with spica casting and 32 patients were treated operatively with flexible IMNs; 3 patients failed nonoperative care. After analysis of final treatment groups, significant differences included age at injury: 3.7 years for cast versus 5.3 years for IMN (P<0.001), time to discharge 21 versus 41 hours (P<0.001), 3.2 versus 4.4 clinic visits (P<0.001), follow-up 3.5 versus 9.4 months (P<0.001). Orthopedic surgeon charges were $1500 for casted patients versus $5500 for IMN (P<0.001). Total hospital charges were $19,200 for cast versus $59,700 for IMN (P<0.001). No difference was found between clinic charges or number of radiographs between groups. In total, 76% of cast group were discharged <24 hours from admission versus 8.6% in operative group. In the operative group, 83% had implant removal with no statistically significant charge difference between those who had implant removal versus retention. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of pediatric femur fractures in 3- to 6-year-olds with IMN is associated with longer hospital stays, significantly greater hospital charges, longer follow-up and more clinic visits compared with spica casting. These findings are at odds with previous literature showing shorter hospital stays and decreased cost with nailing compared to traction and casting. This shows a clear difference between 2 treatments that yield similar clinical and radiographic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Prophylactic Fixation Can Be Cost-effective in Preventing a Contralateral Bisphosphonate-associated Femur Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fractures associated with osteoporosis but increase the risk of atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures. After unilateral atypical femur fracture, there is risk of contralateral fracture, but the indications for prophylactic fixation are controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to use Markov modeling to determine whether contralateral prophylactic femur fracture fixation is cost-effective after a bisphosphonate-associated atypical femur fracture and, if so, what patient-related factors may influence that determination. METHODS: Markov modeling was used to determine the cost-effectiveness of contralateral prophylactic fixation after an initial atypical femur fracture. Simulated patients aged 60 to 90 years were included and separated into standard and high fracture risk cohorts. Patients with standard fracture risk were defined as those presenting with one atypical femur fracture but without symptoms or findings in the contralateral femur, whereas patients with high fracture risk were typified as those with more than one risk factor, including Asian ethnicity, prodromal pain, femoral geometry changes, or radiographic findings in the contralateral femur. Outcome probabilities and utilities were derived from studies matching to patient characteristics, and fragility fracture literature was used when atypical femur fracture data were not available. Associated costs were largely derived from Medicare 2015 reimbursement rates. Sensitivity analysis was performed on all model parameters within defined ranges. RESULTS: Prophylactic fixation for a 70-year-old patient with standard risk for fracture costs USD 131,300/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and for high-risk patients costs USD 22,400/QALY. Sensitivity analysis revealed that prophylaxis for high-risk patients is cost-effective at USD 100,000/QALY when the cost of prophylaxis was less than USD 29,400, the probability of prophylaxis complications was less than 21%, or if the patient was younger than 89 years old. The parameters to which the model was most sensitive were the cost of prophylaxis, patient age, and probability of prophylaxis-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral side after unilateral atypical femur fracture is not cost-effective for standard-risk patients but is cost-effective among high-risk patients between 60 and 89 years of age with a high risk for an atypical femur fracture defined by patients with more than one risk factor such as Asian ethnicity, prodromal pain, varus proximal femur geometry, femoral bowing, or radiographic changes such as periosteal beaking and a transverse radiolucent line. However, our findings are based on several key assumptions for modeling such as the probability of fractures and complications, the costs associated for each health state, and the risks of surgical treatment. Future research should prospectively evaluate the degree of risk contributed by known radiographic and demographic parameters to guide management of the contralateral femur after a patient presents with an atypical femur fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, economic and decision analyses.

Developing Research to Change Policy: Design of a Multicenter Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Intramedullary Nailing to Skeletal Traction in Malawi.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of our study is to prospectively evaluate the cost effectiveness of intramedullary nailing compared with skeletal traction in a resource-limited setting where traction remains the most common definitive treatment. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective multicenter investigation was conducted in Malawi at 2 central hospitals and 3 district hospitals. The project was divided into phases. In phase 1, the EuroQol-5D and SMFA were translated and validated in Chichewa. In phase 2, adult patents with OTA/AO 32 femur shaft fractures were prospectively enrolled, and a comparison of quality of life and functional status was made. In phase 3, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed between those treated with intramedullary nail and those treated with skeletal traction. CONCLUSION: This study serves as an example of an economic study in orthopaedic surgery conducted in a resource-poor environment through academic collaboration.

Effectiveness of a Model Bundle Payment Initiative for Femur Fracture Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effectiveness of a Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative for patients who would be included in a future potential Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment bundle. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single Academic Institution. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients discharged with operative fixation of a hip or femur fracture (Diagnosis-Related Group codes 480-482) between January 2015 and October 2016 were included. A BPCI initiative based on an established program for BPCI total joint arthroplasty was initiated for patients with hip and femur fractures in January 2016. Patients were divided into nonbundle (care before initiative) and bundle (care with initiative) cohorts. INTERVENTION: Application of BPCI principles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, location of discharge, and readmissions. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients participated in the "institutional bundle," and 126 received care before the initiative. There was a trend toward decreased mean length of stay (7.3 ± 6.3 days vs. 6.8 ± 4.0 days, P = 0.457) and decreased readmission within 90 days (22.2% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.426). The number of patients discharged home doubled (30.2% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.008). There was no difference in readmission rates in bundle versus nonbundle patients based on discharged home status; however, bundle patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility trended toward less readmissions than nonbundle patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility (37.3% vs. 50.6%, P = 0.402). Mean episode cost reduction due to initiative was estimated to be $6450 using Medicare reimbursement data. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential success of a BPCI initiative at 1 institution in decreasing postacute care facility utilization and cost of care when used for a hip and femur fracture population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Socioeconomic Implications of Isolated Tibial and Femoral Fractures from Road Traffic Injuries in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the socioeconomic implications of isolated tibial and femoral fractures caused by road traffic injuries in Uganda. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study included adult patients who were admitted to Uganda's national referral hospital with an isolated tibial or femoral fracture. The primary outcome was the time to recovery following injury. We assessed recovery using 4 domains: income, employment status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) recovery, and school attendance of the patients' dependents. RESULTS: The majority of the study participants (83%) were employed, and they were the main income earner for their household (74.0%) at the time of injury, earning a mean annual income of 2,375 U.S. dollars (USD). All of the patients had been admitted with the intention of surgical treatment; however, because of resource constraints, only 56% received operative treatment. By 2 years postinjury, only 63% of the participants had returned to work, and 34% had returned to their previous income level. Overall, the mean monthly income was 62% less than preinjury earnings, and participants had accumulated 1,069 USD in debt since the injury; 41% of the participants had regained HRQoL scores near their baseline, and 62% of school-aged dependents, enrolled at the time of injury, were in school at 2 years postinjury. CONCLUSIONS: At 2 years postinjury, only 12% of our cohort of Ugandan patients who had sustained an isolated tibial or femoral fracture from a road traffic injury had recovered both economically and physically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Direct medical costs of hospital treatment of fractures of the upper extremity of the femur]. / Le coût médical direct de la prise en charge hospitalière des fractures de l'extrémité supérieure du fémur.

Fractures of the upper extremity of the femur are serious because of their morbidity and social and/or economic consequences. They have been the subject of several studies of world literature concerning their hospital treatment, evolution and prevention. The increase in the incidence of this pathology seems unavoidable due to population ageing and to the lengthening life expectancy; it is posing a real long-term public health problem whose importance will be further increased by the need to control health care costs. The results of this study show that the average age of onset of fracture of the proximal extremity of the femur is 68,13 ± 16.9 years, with a male predominance and a sex ratio of 1.14. In our study pertrochanterian fractures represented 69.4% of cases. Direct medical costs of the hospital treatment of fractures of the upper extremity of the femur at the Hassan II University Hospital were £387 714,38 in 222 cases, with an average cost of £1757,4 , including costs for patient's stay in hospital, which represented the majority of expenses ( 77% of total costs). It is desirable to raise staff awareness of the costs of consumables in order to reduce treatment costs and to adopt cost-oriented behaviour. Length of stay should be limited to the maximum extent because it only allows to reduce staff and accommodation costs.