Baseline serum PINP level is associated with the increase in hip bone mineral density seen with Romosozumab treatment in previously untreated women with osteoporosis.

Baseline serum PINP value was significantly and independently associated with the increased bone mineral density (≥ 3%) in both total hip and femoral necks by 12 months of romosozumab treatment in patients with treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporosis. PURPOSE: Some patients fail to obtain a sufficiently increased hip bone mineral density (BMD) by romosozumab (ROMO) treatment. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factor for increased hip BMD with ROMO in patients with treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: This prospective, observational, and multicenter study included patients (n = 63: mean age, 72.6 years; T-scores of the lumbar spine [LS], - 3.3; total hip [TH], - 2.6; femoral neck [FN], - 3.3; serum type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide [PINP], 68.5 µg/L) treated by ROMO for 12 months. BMD and serum bone turnover markers were evaluated at each time point. A responder analysis was performed to assess the patient percentage, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the factors associated with clinically significant increased BMD (≥ 3%) in both TH and FN. RESULTS: Percentage changes of BMD from baseline in the LS, TH, and FN areas were 17.5%, 4.9%, and 4.3%, respectively. In LS, 96.8% of patients achieved ≥ 6% increased LS-BMD, although 57.1% could not achieve ≥ 3% increased BMD in either TH or FN. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only the baseline PINP value was significantly and independently associated with ≥ 3% increased BMD in both TH and FN (p = 0.019, 95% confidence interval = 1.006-1.054). The optimal cut-off PINP value was 53.7 µg/L with 54.3% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity (area under the curve = 0.752). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, baseline PINP value was associated with the increased BMD of TH and FN by ROMO treatment in treatment-naive patients.

Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis and is more prevalent among people with CKD than among people who do not have CKD. Although several drugs have been used to effectively treat osteoporosis in the general population, it is unclear whether they are also effective and safe for people with CKD, who have altered systemic mineral and bone metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in patients with CKD stages 3-5, and those undergoing dialysis (5D). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 25 January 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing any anti-osteoporotic drugs with a placebo, no treatment or usual care in patients with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed their quality using the risk of bias tool, and extracted data. The main outcomes were the incidence of fracture at any sites; mean change in the bone mineral density (BMD; measured using dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry (DXA)) of the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, and distal radius; death from all causes; incidence of adverse events; and quality of life (QoL). Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: Seven studies involving 9164 randomised participants with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D met the inclusion criteria; all participants were postmenopausal women. Five studies included patients with CKD stages 3-4, and two studies included patients with CKD stages 5 or 5D. Five pharmacological interventions were identified (abaloparatide, alendronate, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide). All studies were judged to be at an overall high risk of bias. Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.69; low certainty evidence). Anti-osteoporotic drugs probably makes little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; moderate certainty evidence) and adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence). We were unable to incorporate studies into the meta-analyses for BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip as they only reported the percentage change in the BMD in the intervention group. Among patients with severe CKD stages 5 or 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; very low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low (MD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.02). Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.04, low certainty evidence). No adverse events were reported in the included studies. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.56; very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture in low certainty evidence. Anti-osteoporotic drugs make little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture and adverse events in moderate certainty evidence. Among patients with CKD stages 5 and 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture and death because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine in low certainty evidence. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Larger studies including men, paediatric patients or individuals with unstable CKD-mineral and bone disorder are required to assess the effect of each anti-osteoporotic drug at each stage of CKD.

Effect of Tissue-Selective Estrogen Complex on Hip Structural Geometry in Postmenopausal Women: A 12-Month Study.

Background: Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a method for evaluating bone geometry reflecting bone structural and biomechanical properties. However, tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) treatment effects on HSA have not been investigated. Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of TSEC treatment on hip geometry in postmenopausal Korean women. The treatment was given for 12 months, and hip geometry was measured by HSA. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 postmenopausal women who received TSEC containing conjugated estrogen 0.45 mg and bazedoxifene 20 mg for treating vasomotor symptoms were included in this retrospective cohort study. The changes in bone mineral density and parameters of HSA including the outer diameter, cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, cortical thickness, section modulus, and buckling ratio as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were compared before and after 12 months of TSEC treatment. Results: Mean age and years since menopause were 55.1 and 4.5 years, respectively. Total hip bone mineral density significantly increased by 0.74% after treatment (P=0.011). The changes in HSA were mainly demonstrated in the narrow femoral neck: cross-sectional area (P=0.003) and cortical thickness (P<0.001) increased significantly. For the shaft region, only SM decreased significantly after treatment (P=0.009). However, most parameters did not change significantly with TSEC treatment in the intertrochanteric and shaft regions. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that 12 months of TSEC treatment could improve bone geometry as measured by HSA. The findings suggest that TSEC might be an interesting option for the prevention of fracture as well as osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Off-treatment bone mineral density changes in postmenopausal women receiving anastrozole for 5 years: 7-year results from the IBIS-II prevention trial.

BACKGROUND: Anastrozole has been associated with substantial accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss during active treatment. METHODS: One thousand four hundred and ten women were included in a BMD substudy and stratified into three strata according to their baseline T-score at spine or femoral neck. The primary objective of this analysis was to investigate whether DXA BMD at the spine and hip changed two years after treatment cessation (between years 5 and 7) in those who did not receive risedronate. RESULTS: Five- and seven-year BMD data were available for a total of 528 women who did not receive risedronate. In women with normal BMD at baseline, an increase in BMD at the lumbar spine after anastrozole withdrawal was observed 1.25% (95% CI 0.73 to 1.77) (P = 0.0004), which was larger than in those on placebo (0.14% (-0.29 to 0.56))). At the hip, BMD remained unchanged between years 5 and 7 for those previously on anastrozole but continued to a decrease in those who had been randomised to placebo (-1.35% (-1.70 to -0.98)). CONCLUSIONS: These are the first results reporting BMD changes after stopping anastrozole in a breast cancer prevention setting. Our results show that the negative effects of anastrozole on BMD in the preventive setting are partially reversible.

Effects of follow-on therapy after denosumab discontinuation in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the effects of follow-on therapy after denosumab (DMAb) discontinuation. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter study, postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis who were previously treated by oral bisphosphonates (BP) (n = 26) or teriparatide (TPTD) (n = 27) were switched to DMAb (administered 2.6 times), and then discontinued. Patients (73.1 years, T-scores of the lumbar spine [LS] - 2.7 and femoral neck [FN] - 2.2) were switched to either (1) raloxifene (RAL) (n = 13) or BP [(2) weekly or monthly BP (wmBP) (n = 29) or (3) zoledronate (ZOL) (n = 11)], based on each physician's decision (mean interval after final DMAb administration was 7.2 months). Bone mineral density (BMD) at final DMAb administration were set as baseline. RESULTS: Changes in LS BMD at 1.5 years after final DMAb administration were -2.7% in the RAL, 0.7% in the wmBP, and 1.9% in the ZOL (p = .31 between groups), and in FN BMD were -3.8%, -0.8%, and 1.8%, respectively (p = .02 between the RAL and ZOL; p = .048 between the RAL and BP). Clinical vertebral fracture incidence during 1.5 years after final DMAb administration was 23.1% in the RAL, 3.4% in the wmBP, and 0.0% in the ZOL (p = .048 between the RAL and ZOL; p = .015 between the RAL and BP). No significant differences were observed in these parameters between the wmBP and ZOL. CONCLUSION: These results may contribute to the selection of adequate follow-on therapy after DMAb discontinuation, although further investigations are required.

Relationship between Regular Green Tea Intake and Osteoporosis in Korean Postmenopausal Women: A Nationwide Study.

Mixed results have been reported regarding whether habitual tea intake affects bone health. This study investigated the relationship between green tea intake and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal Korean women. We used data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 2008 to 2011 and divided the participants into three groups according to their frequency of green tea intake over the past 12 months. BMD of the lumbar spine, total femur, and femur neck was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of osteoporosis and osteopenia according to green tea consumption were analyzed. Participants who did not consume green tea or consumed less than one cup per day were more likely to have osteopenia of the lumbar spine or femur than those who consumed it once to three times a day (OR 1.81 and 1.85, 95% CI, 1.20-2.71; and 1.23-2.77). Moreover, ORs for osteoporosis were 1.91 (95% CI 1.13-3.23) and 1.82 (95% CI 1.09-3.05) in non-consumers and consumers who drank less than one cup per day, respectively, compared with the reference group. These results support that green tea consumption may have benefits on bone health.

Beneficial effects of switching to denosumab from bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and osteopenia/osteoporosis.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a higher bone fracture risk than patients without diabetes. Although denosumab (Dmab) is a potent bone resorption inhibitor, its efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of switching to Dmab from bisphosphonates (BP) or a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) in postmenopausal type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a three medical institutions, prospective, observational study for postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose T-score of femoral neck or lumbar spine bone mineral density was under -1.0 standard deviation, even after >6 months of BP or SERM administration. After obtaining consent, participants were treated for osteopenia/osteoporosis by either continuing BP (BP-BP group)/SERM (SERM-SERM group), or by switching to Dmab (BP-Dmab or SERM-Dmab groups). Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism marker levels were evaluated after 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in this study, and each group comprised 12 patients. No significant difference existed in baseline characteristics among the groups. The average age and glycated hemoglobin were 71 ± 8 years and 7.2 ± 0.9%, respectively. In the SERM-Dmab group, lumbar spine bone mineral density was significantly increased by 5.0% compared with the SERM-SERM group (P < 0.04). Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b were significantly decreased in the BP-Dmab and SERM-Dmab groups compared with the BP-BP and SERM-SERM groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to Dmab from BP or SERM is beneficial to prevent osteoporosis progression in postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Dietary Advanced Glycation End-Products (dAGEs) Intake and Bone Health: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the Rotterdam Study.

Animal studies suggest a role for dietary advanced glycation end-products (dAGEs) in bone health, but human studies on dAGEs in relation to bone are lacking. We aimed to study whether dAGEs intake is associated with the parameters of bone strength namely, bone mineral density (BMD), prevalent vertebral (VFs), and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs = hip, wrist, proximal humerus, and clinical VFs). 3949 participants (mean age 66.7 ± 10.5 years) were included from a Rotterdam study for whom Carboxymethyllysine (CML-a dietary AGE) was estimated from food frequency questionnaires combined with dAGEs databases. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were performed adjusting for age, sex, energy intake, dietary quality, physical activity, diabetes, smoking, renal function, and cohort effect and for models on fractures, subsequently for BMD. We observed no association of CML with BMD at both femoral neck (ß = -0.006; p = 0.70) and lumbar spine (ß = -0.013; p = 0.38). A higher intake of CML was linearly associated with VFs (Odds ratio, OR = 1.16, 95% CI (1.02-1.32) and a similar but non-significant trend with MOFs (OR = 1.12 (0.98-1.27). Additional adjustment for BMD did not change the associations. Our results imply a positive association between dietary intake of CML and VFs independent of BMD. Future studies are needed in order to elucidate whether associations found are causal.

Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Bone Mass After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in young women who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 234 female patients with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) who underwent allogeneic HSCT between April 2009 and April 2016 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital in Seoul, Korea. Inclusion criteria included adult patients who were age 40 years or younger at the time of transplantation and were followed for at least 3 years after HSCT. RESULTS: At the first and second years after HRT, there was a significant increase in the BMD of the lumbar spine of the HRT group (n = 170) compared to that of the non-HRT group (n = 64) (P = .033 and P = .047, respectively). The BMD of the lumbar spine significantly increased from baseline by 4.16 ±â€…4.39% and 5.42 ±â€…5.86% after 1 and 2 years of HRT, respectively (P = .037 and P = .021). The BMD of the femoral neck and total hip also showed a significant percentage increase from baseline after 2 years of HRT. These changes were significant even in the presence of graft-versus-host disease or steroid exposure. For HRT that was initiated within 12 months after HSCT, the increase in BMD in the lumbar spine was greatest after 2 years of HRT. CONCLUSIONS: These results support that early and active hormonal therapy might be beneficial for BMD in female HSCT recipients with POI.

Aromatase inhibitors attenuate the effect of alendronate in women with breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Aromatase inhibitors are known to accelerate bone loss in patients with breast cancer. However, how much AIs affect the efficacy of antiresorptive agents has not been studied. The study aimed to compare the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) between patients with and without AI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 90 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who were being treated with both AI and alendronate 70 mg weekly (ALN + AI), and 90 age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients who were only taking alendronate (ALN-only) were analyzed. BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) were assessed at the baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: The mean age was 63 years. At baseline, the ALN-only group had lower lumbar spine (LS), femur neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BMD than ALN + AI group. After 1-year of alendronate treatment, the LS and FN BMD were improved more in the ALN-only group than those in the ALN + AI group after adjustments for age, BMI, baseline BMD, diabetes, hypertension, renal function, and previous fracture history [LS BMD: 6.2% (3.1%; 9.2%) in ALN-only, 3.5% (-0.5%; 6.5%) in ALN + AI, p = 0.001; FN BMD: 2.5% (0.3%; 5.7%) in ALN-only, 0.9% (- 1.8%; 3.6%) in ALD + AI, p = 0.032]. BTMs were significantly decreased in both groups, but the changes between groups were similar. CONCLUSION: The effect of alendronate on the LS and FN BMD was attenuated in postmenopausal women who were taking AI compared to those who were not on AI.

Comparison between teriparatide and bisphosphonates for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of teriparatide and bisphosphonates in managing postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published before April 2018 and compared teriparatide and bisphosphonates in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed effects or random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The teriparatide group was associated with a lower total occurrence of vertebral fractures (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40-0.77; P = .001) and nonvertebral fractures (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.90; P = .009) than the bisphosphonate group. Moreover, compared with the bisphosphonate group, the teriparatide group had improved bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at the final follow-up (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the teriparatide and bisphosphonate groups in terms of complications (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.22, P = .516). CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide significantly reduced the occurrence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in osteoporosis patients. More studies should focus on the quality of life of patients using these 2 drugs.

Eldecalcitol is superior to alfacalcidol in maintaining bone mineral density in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients (e-GLORIA).

INTRODUCTION: Eldecalcitol increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces vertebral fracture in patients with primary osteoporosis. However, the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD and fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) patients is unknown. This study was undertaken to compare the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD and fracture with that of alfacalcidol in GIO patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, parallel group study was conducted to identify the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with 0.75 µg eldecalcitol compared with 1.0 µg alfacalcidol in GIO patients. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD increased with eldecalcitol, but decreased with alfacalcidol at 12 and 24 months (between group difference 1.29%, p < 0.01, and 1.10%, p < 0.05, respectively). Total hip and femoral neck BMD were maintained until 24 months by eldecalcitol, but decreased by alfacalcidol (between group difference 0.97%, p < 0.05 and 1.22%, p < 0.05, respectively). Both bone formation and resorption markers were more strongly suppressed by eldecalcitol than by alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol showed better effect on BMD than alfacalcidol in patients with no prevalent fracture and BMD > 70% of the young adult mean, and with ≤ 3 months of previous glucocorticoid treatment. No significant difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture was found, and the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Eldecalcitol was more effective than alfacalcidol in maintaining BMD in GIO patients. Because eldecalcitol was effective in patients with no or short-term previous glucocorticoid treatment, as well as those without prevalent fracture or low BMD, eldecalcitol can be a good candidate for primary prevention of GIO. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000011700.

Modeling-Based Bone Formation in the Human Femoral Neck in Subjects Treated With Denosumab.

Denosumab is associated with continued gains in hip and spine BMD with up to 10 years of treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Despite potent inhibition of bone remodeling, findings in nonhuman primates suggest modeling-based bone formation (MBBF) may persist during denosumab treatment. This study assessed whether MBBF in the femoral neck (FN) is preserved in the context of inhibited remodeling in subjects receiving denosumab. This open-label study enrolled postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had received two or more doses of denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months [Q6M]) per standard of care and were planning elective total hip replacement (THR) owing to osteoarthritis of the hip. Transverse sections of the FN were obtained after THR and analyzed histomorphometrically. MBBF, based on fluorochrome labeling and presence of smooth cement lines, was evaluated in cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal envelopes of the FN. Histomorphometric parameters were used to assess MBBF and remodeling-based bone formation (RBBF) in denosumab-treated subjects (n = 4; mean age = 73.5 years; range, 70 to 78 years) and historical female controls (n = 11; mean age = 67.8 years; range, 62 to 80 years) obtained from the placebo group of a prior study and not treated with denosumab. All analyses were descriptive. All subjects in both groups exhibited MBBF in the periosteal envelope; in cancellous and endocortical envelopes, all denosumab-treated subjects and 81.8% of controls showed evidence of MBBF. Compared with controls, denosumab-treated subjects showed 9.4-fold and 2.0-fold higher mean values of MBBF in cancellous and endocortical envelopes, respectively, whereas RBBF mean values were 5.0-fold and 5.3-fold lower. In the periosteal envelope, MBBF and RBBF rates were similar between subjects and controls. These results demonstrate the occurrence of MBBF in the human FN and suggest that denosumab preserves MBBF while inhibiting remodeling, which may contribute to the observed continued gains in BMD over time after remodeling is maximally inhibited. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Prospective Study Evaluating Changes in Bone Quality in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian suppression from chemotherapy results in bone loss in premenopausal women with breast cancer (BC). Less is known about bone microarchitecture changes. We used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to measure volumetric bone density and trabecular and cortical microarchitecture in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was to assess changes in cortical thickness and trabecular bone density by HR-pQCT. Premenopausal women with stage I to III BC undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy underwent a bone mineral density (BMD) dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan and HR-pQCT (voxel size, 82 microns) at baseline and 12 months. Paired t tests were used to observe the change over time in bone microarchitecture and areal and volumetric density. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were evaluated, of which 12 patients had baseline and matched 12-month imaging. The mean age was 45.2 years (range, 35-51 years), 17 (94%) patients had hormone receptor-positive BC, and 16 (89%) initiated tamoxifen. At 12 months, there was a significant decrease in femoral neck (P < .05) and lumbar spine and total hip (P < .01) BMD. Changes detected by HR-pQCT at 12 months included significant decreases in cortical thickness and area at the tibia (P < .05), and total and cortical volumetric BMD at the radius and tibia (P < .01), as well as an increase in tibial trabecular area (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy experience BMD decline and trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture deterioration. In this population, future efforts should focus on therapy-induced bone loss and optimizing bone density-related management.

Nanohydroxyapatite Based Ceramic Carrier Promotes Bone Formation in a Femoral Neck Canal Defect in Osteoporotic Rats.

Hip fractures are among the most common types of fracture risks in old age osteoporotic patients that often end up with immobile disabilities. Weak bones due to loss of mineral content along with an increase in the porosity of the femur neck canal in osteoporosis reduce the mechanical properties of the bone and predispose the patients to fractures. In this study, we have used calcium sulfate/nanohydroxyapatite based nanocement (NC) as carrier of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), zoledronate (ZA), and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived exosomes (EXO) to enhance bone formation and defect healing in a femur neck canal defect model in osteoporotic rats. A cylindrical defect in the femur neck canal with dimensions of 1 mm (diameter) × 8 mm (length) starting from the lateral cortex toward the apex of the femur head was developed. The defect was impacted using NC alone or functionalized as (a) NC + ZA (systemic), (b) NC + ZA (local), (c) NC + EXO + ZA, and (d) NC + BMP + ZA to evaluate bone formation by ex vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analysis 16 weeks postsurgery. Moreover, the femurs (both defect and contralateral leg) were subjected to biomechanical analysis to assess the effect of treatments on compressive mechanical properties of the bones. The treatment groups (NC + ZA (L), NC + BMP + ZA, and NC + EXO + ZA) showed enhanced bone formation with complete healing of the defect. No differences in the mechanical properties of both the defect and contralateral across the leg were observed among the groups. However, a trend was observed where NC + BMP + ZA showed enhanced biomechanical strength in the defect leg. This suggests that NC could act as a potent carrier of bioactive molecules to reduce the risks of hip fractures in osteoporotic animals. This type of treatment can be given to patients who are at higher risk of osteoporosis mediated femur neck fracture as a preventive measure or for enhanced healing in already compromised situations. Moreover, this study provided a proof of concept regarding the use of exosomes in bone regeneration therapy, which might be used as a booster dose that will eventually reduce the dosage of BMP and hence circumvent the limitations associated with the use of BMP.

Bone Mineral Density Response With Denosumab in Combination With Standard or High-Dose Teriparatide: The DATA-HD RCT.

CONTEXT: In the Denosumab and High-Dose Teriparatide Administration (DATA-HD) study, we reported that 15 months of combined high-dose (HD) teriparatide and denosumab increased mean areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the hip and spine more than combined denosumab and standard-dose (SD) teriparatide. OBJECTIVE: In the current analysis, we compare the individual rates of aBMD response between the treatment groups. DESIGN: Single-site, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which postmenopausal women received either teriparatide 20-µg daily (SD) or 40-µg daily (HD) given months 0 through 9, overlapped with denosumab 60 mg, given months 3 through 15 (15 months' total duration). The proportion of participants in the SD and HD groups experiencing total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine aBMD gains of >3%, >6%, and >9% were compared. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis completing all study visits (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): aBMD (dual x-ray absorptiometry). RESULTS: At the end of the 15-month treatment period, a higher proportion of women in the HD group had aBMD increases >3% (83% vs. 58%, P = .037) and >6% (45% vs. 19%, P = .034) at the total hip, and >3% at the femoral neck (86% vs. 63%, P = .044). At the lumbar spine, >3% response rates were similar, whereas the >6% and >9% response rates were greater in the HD group (100% vs. 79%, P = .012 and 93% vs. 59%, P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with the SD regimen, more women treated with the HD regimen achieved clinically meaningful and rapid gains in hip and spine aBMD. These results suggest that this approach may provide unique benefits in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Effect of Abaloparatide vs Alendronate on Fracture Risk Reduction in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis.

CONTEXT: The ACTIVE study demonstrated the antifracture efficacy of abaloparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. ACTIVExtend demonstrated sustained fracture risk reduction with alendronate in abaloparatide-treated participants from ACTIVE. A direct comparison of the efficacy of abaloparatide and antiresorptive therapies has not been performed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis is to compare the antifracture efficacy of abaloparatide in ACTIVE with that of alendronate in ACTIVExtend. DESIGN: In this post hoc analysis, the rate of new vertebral fractures for women in ACTIVExtend (N = 1139) was calculated based on baseline and endpoint radiographs for placebo or abaloparatide in ACTIVE and alendronate in ACTIVExtend. Vertebral fracture rates between abaloparatide and alendronate were compared in a Poisson regression model. Fracture rates for nonvertebral and clinical fractures were compared based on a Poisson model during 18 months of abaloparatide or placebo treatment in ACTIVE and 18 months of alendronate treatment in ACTIVExtend. RESULTS: The vertebral fracture rate was lower during abaloparatide treatment in ACTIVE (0.47 fractures/100 patient-years) than alendronate treatment in ACTIVExtend (1.66 fractures/100 patient-years) (relative risk reduction 71%; P = .027). Although the comparisons did not meet statistical significance, after switching from placebo (ACTIVE) to alendronate (ACTIVExtend), the rate of new vertebral fractures decreased from 2.49 to 1.66 fractures per 100 patient-years, and after switching from abaloparatide to alendronate from 0.47 to 0.19 fractures per 100 patient-years. The rates of nonvertebral fractures and clinical fractures were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment with abaloparatide may result in greater vertebral fracture reduction compared with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

DSS-induced colitis produces inflammation-induced bone loss while irisin treatment mitigates the inflammatory state in both gut and bone.

Chronic pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leads to lack of bone accrual, bone loss, and increased fractures. Presently there is no cure, and many IBD treatments incur negative side effects. We previously discovered treatment with exogenous irisin resolved inflammatory changes in the colon, gut lymphatics, and bone in a mild IBD rodent model. Here we assess irisin treatment in severe IBD induced via dextran sodium sulfate (DSS). Male Sprague Dawley rats (2-mo-old) were untreated (Con) or given 2% DSS in drinking water. In week two, half of each group (Con + Ir and DSS + Ir) received injections of recombinant irisin (i.p., 2x/wk). After 4 weeks, gut inflammation was associated with declines in bone mineral density and cancellous bone volume. Furthermore, elevated osteocyte TNF-α, interleukin-6, RANKL, OPG, and sclerostin corresponded with higher osteoclast surfaces and lower bone formation rate in DSS animals as well as lower ultimate load. While irisin treatment improved colon inflammation, there were no improvements in bone density or bone mechanical properties; however, irisin elevated bone formation rate, decreased osteoclast surfaces, and reduced osteocyte pro-inflammatory factors. These data highlight the negative impact of chronic gut inflammation on bone as well as the therapeutic potential of irisin as an anti-inflammatory treatment.

Effect of different iron chelation regimens on bone mass in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients.

Objectives: Iron overload might lead to bone loss in transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) patients. To investigate the role of iron chelation therapy (ICT) on bone mineral density (BMD) of TDT patients suffering from iron overload, the authors compared the efficacy of five different iron chelation regimens through assessing serum ferritin and BMD.Methods: In 256 consecutive TDT patients, BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in lumbar spine and femoral neck regions. Treatment outcome of five iron chelation regimens including Deferoxamine (DFO), Deferiprone (DFP), Deferasirox (DFX), and combination therapy was evaluated to compare the mean differences of serum ferritin and BMD indices pre- and post-treatment during 12-months follow-up period.Results: No significant difference was observed in DXA characteristics and serum ferritin level changes between ICT groups, but combination of DFO and DFX had the best outcome in improving bone mass through assessing each group individually.Conclusion: Combination therapy with DFX and DFO had the highest impact on reducing serum ferritin, however insignificant, and improving bone loss in both lumbar spine and femoral neck in comparison with other regimens. A randomized prospective clinical trial is advised to accurately assess the efficacy of iron chelation regimens on BMD measurements of TDT patients.

Zoledronate for the Prevention of Bone Loss in Women Discontinuing Denosumab Treatment. A Prospective 2-Year Clinical Trial.

Cessation of denosumab treatment is associated with increases in bone turnover above baseline values and rapid bone loss. We investigated the efficacy of zoledronate to prevent this bone loss in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who were treated with denosumab (mean duration 2.2 years) and discontinued treatment after achieving osteopenia. Women were randomized to receive a single 5-mg infusion of zoledronate (ZOL) (n = 27) or two additional 60-mg injections of denosumab (Dmab) (n = 30). Both groups were followed for a total period of 24 months. At 24 months lumbar spine-bone mineral density (LS-BMD) was not different from baseline in the ZOL group, but decreased in the Dmab group by (mean ± SD) 4.82% ± 0.7% (p < 0.001) from the 12-month value; the difference in BMD changes between the two groups, the primary endpoint of the study, was statistically significant (p = 0.025). Results of femoral neck (FN)-BMD changes were similar. ZOL infusion was followed by small but significant increases in serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) during the first year and stabilization thereafter. In the Dmab group, bone turnover marker values did not change during the first 12 months but increased significantly at 15 months and in the majority of women these remained elevated at 24 months. Neither baseline nor 12-month bone turnover marker values were associated with BMD changes in either group of women. In the Dmab group, three patients sustained vertebral fractures (two patients multiple clinical, one patient morphometric) whereas one patient in the ZOL group sustained clinical vertebral fractures 12 months after the infusion. In conclusion, a single intravenous infusion of ZOL given 6 months after the last Dmab injection prevents bone loss for at least 2 years independently of the rate of bone turnover. Follow-up is recommended, because in a few patients ZOL treatment might not have the expected effect at 2 years. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.