Animal models for filovirus infections.

The family Filoviridae, which includes the genera Marburgvirus and Ebolavirus, contains some of the most pathogenic viruses in humans and non-human primates (NHPs), causing severe hemorrhagic fevers with high fatality rates. Small animal models against filoviruses using mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, and ferrets have been developed with the goal of screening candidate vaccines and antivirals, before testing in the gold standard NHP models. In this review, we summarize the different animal models used to understand filovirus pathogenesis, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to filovirus disease research.

Role of EXT1 and Glycosaminoglycans in the Early Stage of Filovirus Entry.

UNLABELLED: Filoviruses, including both Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus (MARV), can infect humans and other animals, causing hemorrhagic fever with a high mortality rate. Entry of these viruses into the host is mediated by a single filoviral glycoprotein (GP). GP is composed of two subunits: GP1, which is responsible for attachment and binding to receptor(s) on susceptible cells, and GP2, which mediates viral and cell membrane fusion. Although numerous host factors have been implicated in the entry process, the initial attachment receptor(s) has not been well defined. In this report, we demonstrate that exostosin 1 (EXT1), which is involved in biosynthesis of heparan sulfate (HS), plays a role in filovirus entry. Expression knockdown of EXT1 by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) impairs GP-mediated pseudoviral entry and that of infectious EBOV and MARV in tissue cultured cells. Furthermore, HS, heparin, and other related glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), to different extents, can bind to and block GP-mediated viral entry and that of infectious filoviruses. These results strongly suggest that HS and other related GAGs are attachment receptors that are utilized by filoviruses for entry and infection. These GAGs may have therapeutic potential in treating EBOV- and MARV-infected patients. IMPORTANCE: Infection by Ebola virus and Marburg virus can cause severe illness in humans, with a high mortality rate, and currently there is no FDA-approved vaccine or therapeutic treatment available. The ongoing 2014 outbreak in West Africa underscores a lack of our understanding in the infection and pathogenesis of these viruses and the urgency of drug discovery and development. In this study, we provide several pieces of evidence that demonstrate that heparan sulfate and other closely related glycosaminoglycans are the molecules that are used by filoviruses for initial attachment. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these glycosaminoglycans can block entry of and infection by filoviruses. Thus, this work provides mechanistic insights on the early step of filoviral infection and suggests a possible therapeutic option for diseases caused by filovirus infection.

Fibroblastic reticular cells and their role in viral hemorrhagic fevers.

Viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) caused by Ebola, Marburg and Lassa viruses often manifest as multiple organ dysfunction and hemorrhagic shock with high mortality. These viruses target numerous cell types, including monocytes and dendritic cells, which are primary early targets that mediate critical pathogenetic processes. This review focuses on fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), another prevalent infected cell type that is known as a key regulator of circulatory and immune functions. Viral infection of FRCs could have debilitating effects in secondary lymphoid organs and various other tissues. FRCs may also contribute to the spread of these deadly viruses throughout the body. Here, we review the salient features of these VHFs and the biology of FRCs, emphasizing the potential role of these cells in VHFs and the rapid deterioration of immune and hemovascular sytems that are characteristic of such acute infections.

Viral complications after transplantation.

All hospital patients are at risk of acquiring infections from visitors or staff members or by nosocomial transmission. Transplant patients have additional routes of acquisition which together represent the major source of infection. These are: reactivation of latent virus; transmission with the donor organ; and transmission by blood. A wide variety of viruses have been implicated, with the common feature that they establish either chronic or latent infection in the donor or recipient. The aim of this paper is to review the natural history, clinical features, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of each of these viral infections. A basic principle will be that the presence of specific antibodies in a donor or recipient before undergoing transplantation is a marker of latent virus within that individual. After transplantation, patients have impaired immune responses, thereby rendering serology unreliable for diagnostic purposes. Instead, methods which detect the virus directly in clinical material should be used.