Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.434
Filter
1.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(9): e243368, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235806

ABSTRACT

This JAMA Forum discusses the issues surrounding medical debt in the US and reflects on policy efforts made in recent years to solve some of the root causes.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Financing, Personal , Humans , Delivery of Health Care/economics , United States , Health Expenditures , Financial Stress
3.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241273214, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289901

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Many health systems screen patients for social determinants of health and refer patients with social needs to community service organizations for assistance. However, few studies have examined how social determinants of health change over time in the same individuals. METHODS: We examined patients screened by The MetroHealth System in Cleveland, Ohio for 11 social determinants of health, including food insecurity, financial strain, transportation, housing stability, utilities affordability, other housing problems, intimate partner violence, social connection, physical activity, daily stress, and digital connectivity. We determined changes in these social determinants among patients screened at baseline and again after 6 to 18 months of follow-up. We further examined correlates of changes in food insecurity, because it is a common need among our patients and leads to numerous referrals to community organizations for assistance. RESULTS: A substantial majority of patients had no change in each social determinant. For example, among 18 038 patients screened twice for food insecurity, 13 913 (77.1%) did not screen positive for food insecurity at baseline and follow-up and 1726 (9.6%) screened positive for food insecurity at both times. A total of 1080 (6.0%) did not screen positive for food insecurity at baseline but screened positive at follow-up while 1319 (7.3%) screened positive for food insecurity at baseline but not at follow-up. Among patients screening positive for food insecurity at baseline, screening negative at follow-up was independently associated with being age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-2.10), not screening positive for financial strain (OR = 1.64, CI = 1.27-2.13), not screening positive for housing problems (OR = 1.65, CI = 1.28-2.13), and not screening positive for intimate partner violence (OR = 1.45, OR = 1.02-2.08). A longer duration between baseline and follow-up screening was also independently associated with not screening positive for food insecurity at follow-up. Being referred for food assistance was not associated with absence of food insecurity at follow-up (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.47-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients report no change in specific social determinants of health over 6 to 18 months. Examining changes may identify subgroups at greatest risk for persistence of adverse determinants and help to evaluate the impact of assistance efforts.


Subject(s)
Food Insecurity , Housing , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Ohio , Adult , Aged , Financial Stress , Transportation , Intimate Partner Violence/statistics & numerical data , Exercise , Socioeconomic Factors , Food Supply/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Stress, Psychological
4.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241277408, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39245900

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Financial strain has important consequences for patients, providers, and health care systems. However, there is currently no gold standard measure to screen for financial strain. This study compared the performance of 3 single-item screeners using a composite measure of financial strain as a "gold standard." METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of unweighted data from a 2021 survey of Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan members comparing the percentages of adults who experienced financial strain based on 3 general single-item screeners, a screener specific to medical and dental health care use, and a composite financial strain measure. The study sample was comprised of 2734 non-Medicaid insured adults who answered all financial strain questions. Kappa statistics evaluating agreement of the 3 general screeners with the composite measure were calculated for the sample overall, by age group, and within age group, by 4 levels of income and 4 racial/ethnic subgroups. RESULTS: Among 947 adults aged 35 to 65, 30.7% had just enough money or not enough money to make ends meet, 23.3% had a somewhat hard or hard time paying for basics, 18.8% had trouble paying for ≥1 type of expense, 20.5% had delayed/used less medical/dental care, and 41.5% had experienced financial strain based on the composite measure. Among 1787 adults aged 66 to 85, the percentages who screened positive on these measures were 22.7%, 19.4%, 12.9%, 19.8%, and 34.4%, respectively. Across the sample, by income categories and racial/ethnic groups, the making ends meet screener identified higher percentages of adults experiencing financial strain and performed better when compared with the composite measure than the hard to pay for the very basics and trouble paying for expenses screeners. Overall, substantial decreases in the percentages of adults who screened positive on the financial strain measures were seen as level of income increased. Within income categories, middle-aged adults were more likely than older adults to have experienced financial strain based on the composite and general single-item screeners. CONCLUSIONS: As social risk screening becomes part of the standard of care, it will be important to assess how well different brief screeners for financial strain perform with diverse patient populations.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Financial Stress , Humans , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Female , Male , California , Aged , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Income/statistics & numerical data
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(9): e2431967, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287948

ABSTRACT

Importance: The degree of cancer patients' financial hardship is dynamic and can change over time. Objective: To assess longitudinal changes in financial hardship among patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, English-speaking adult patients with a new diagnosis of stage I to III colorectal cancer being treated with curative intent at National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practices between May 2018 and July 2020 and who had not started chemotherapy and/or radiation were included. Data analysis was conducted from March to December 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients completed surveys at baseline as well as at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment. Cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship, as adopted by Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, were measured. Factors associated with financial hardship were assessed using longitudinal multivariable logistic regression models with time interaction. Results: A total of 451 patients completed baseline questions, with 217 (48.1%) completing the 24-month follow-up. Mean (SD) age was 61.0 (12.0) years (210 [46.6%] female; 33 [7.3%] Black, 380 [84.3%] White, and 33 [7.3%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individuals or those who did not report race or who had unknown race). Among 217 patients with data at baseline and 24 months, 19 (8.8%) reported cost-related care nonadherence at baseline vs 20 (9.2%) at 24 months (P = .84), and 125 (57.6%) reported material hardship at baseline vs 76 (35.0%) at 24 months (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, lower financial worry (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93), higher education (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77), and older age (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98) were associated with lower nonadherence. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with higher material hardship (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.15-6.29), while lower financial worry was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). Over 24 months, female sex was associated with lower nonadherence (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), while higher education was associated with higher nonadherence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Being employed was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), while receipt of care at safety-net hospitals was associated with higher hardship (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with early-stage colorectal cancer, material hardship was more common than cost-related cancer care nonadherence and decreased over time, while nonadherence remained unchanged. Early and longitudinal financial screening and referral to intervention are recommended to mitigate financial hardship.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Financial Stress , Humans , Female , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Aged , United States , Neoplasm Staging , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Soc Sci Med ; 357: 117197, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153233

ABSTRACT

The label "deaths of despair" for rising US mortality related to drugs/alcohol/suicide seems to implicate emotional distress as the cause. However, a Durkheimian approach would argue that underlying structural factors shape individuals' behavior and emotions. Despite a growing literature on deaths of despair, no study has directly compared the effects of distress and structural factors on deaths of despair versus other causes of mortality. Using data from the Midlife in the United States study with approximately 26 years of mortality follow-up, we evaluated whether psychological or economic distress, employment status, and social integration were more strongly associated with drug/alcohol/suicide mortality than with other causes. Cox hazard models, adjusted for potential confounders, showed little evidence that psychological or economic distress were more strongly associated with mortality related to drugs/alcohol/suicide than mortality from other causes. While distress measures were modestly, but significantly associated with these deaths, the associations were similar in magnitude for many other types of mortality. In contrast, detachment from the labor force and lower social integration were both strongly associated with drug/alcohol/suicide mortality, more than for many other types of mortality. Differences in the estimated percentage dying of despair between age 25 and 65 were larger for employment status (2.0% for individuals who were neither employed nor retired versus only 0.6% for currently employed) and for social integration (1.9% for low versus 0.7% for high integration) than for negative affect (1.2% for high versus 0.8% for no negative affect). Most of the association between distress and drug/alcohol/suicide mortality appeared to result from confounding with structural factors and with pre-existing health conditions that may influence both the perception of distress and mortality risk. While deaths of despair result from self-destructive behavior, our results suggest that structural factors may be more important determinants than subjective distress.


Subject(s)
Employment , Social Integration , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Employment/psychology , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/psychology , Psychological Distress , Financial Stress/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Proportional Hazards Models , Substance-Related Disorders/mortality , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Cause of Death/trends
8.
Environ Int ; 191: 108976, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39216331

ABSTRACT

Multiple external stressors are known to have adverse impacts on health and development. Certain groups are more vulnerable and/or more likely to be exposed toenvironmental, psychological, and social stressors simultaneously. Yet, few studies have examined combined exposure to environmental toxicants and psychosocial stress. Here, we integrated environmental chemical exposure data collected using silicone wristbands and self-report social stressor data within the Brain and Early Experience (BEE) perinatal cohort to understand co-exposure to environmental chemicals and social stress. Silicone wristbands were worn for one week by mothers throughout central North Carolina who were 6 months postpartum (n = 97). Exposure to 110 environmental chemicals across eight chemical classes was quantified on silicone wristbands using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Social stress was evaluated using eight established self-report questionnaires (e.g., Brief Symptom Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale), quantifying experiences such as race-related stress, economic strain, and relationship conflict. Hair cortisol levels were measured as an additional metric of stress. The chemical exposure landscape and associations among chemical exposure, demographic characteristics, and social stress were characterized through individual variable analyses, cluster and data reduction, and compiled scoring approaches to comprehensively evaluate chemical and social stress burdens. We found that chemicals contain co-occurring patterns largely based on chemical class, with phthalates representing the chemical class with highest exposure and polychlorinated biphenyls the lowest. Chemicals showed differential exposure across racial groups, with diethyl phthalate, triphenyl phosphate, and tris(3,5-dimethyl phenyl) phosphate at higher levels in Black participants compared with White participants. Integrating social stressor profiling with chemical exposure data identified one particularly vulnerable subset of participants in which high chemical exposure burden coincided with high experiences of racism and economic stress. These findings demonstrate co-occurring chemical and social stress, warranting further investigation to better understand how these combined stressors may contribute to disparities in maternal and child health.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure , Postpartum Period , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Female , Adult , Self Report , North Carolina , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Cohort Studies , Young Adult , Hair/chemistry , Financial Stress
9.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 8(5)2024 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term financial impact of cancer care has not been adequately addressed in young adults. As part of a remote intervention study, we describe medical financial distress and hardship among young adult survivors of blood cancer at study entry. METHODS: Young adults were recruited from 6 US hospitals. Using a Research Electronic Data Capture link, young adults confirmed their eligibility-namely, currently 18 to 39 years of age, blood cancer diagnosis 3 or more years ago, off active treatment, and not on parent's insurance. Following consent, the baseline assessment was sent. The primary outcome measure, the Personal Financial Wellness Scale, measured financial distress (scored as severe, 1-2; high, 3-4; average, 5-6; and low to no, 7-10). Medical financial hardship encompassed material hardship, psychological impact, and coping behaviors. Descriptive summary statistics and linear regression were used. RESULTS: Among the 126 participants, 54.5% came from minority racial or ethnic groups. Median time since diagnosis was 10 years (interquartile range = 6-16 years), with 56% having received a diagnosis when they were between 18 and 39 years of age. The overall mean (standard deviation) Personal Financial Wellness Scale score was 5.1 (2.4), but 49% reported severe or high distress. In multivariable analysis, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and lower income were strongly associated with worse Personal Financial Wellness Scale scores. Among participants with severe financial distress (n = 26), 72% reported 2 or more household material hardships, had worse scores across all psychological domains, and altered survivorship care because of cost (68%). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of long-term young adult cancer survivors reported severe or high levels of financial distress. Individuals with severe or high distress also reported more medical financial hardship than other participants. This finding highlights the need for ongoing financial intervention in this vulnerable population. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05620979.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Cancer Survivors , Financial Stress , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Hematologic Neoplasms/economics , Income , Linear Models , United States
10.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 35(3): 903-919, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39129609

ABSTRACT

Research has established relationships between social determinants of health (SDOH) and mental health, with mixed findings on which ethnoracial groups are most vulnerable to deleterious outcomes. The current study examines ethnoracial differences in SDOH and their associations with acute mental health symptoms among patients hospitalized after emergency care. Using data collected in a multi-site study of 1,318 diverse adults admitted to inpatient units, we performed analyses using linear regression models. Findings show that Multiracial/Indigenous and Black adults had significantly higher discrimination and financial stress scores. However, compared with White adults, the positive association between extreme discrimination and acute mental health symptoms was diminished among Latinx (B=-2.3; p=.02) and Black individuals (B=-1.6; p=.05) as was the positive association between financial insecurity and acute mental health symptoms for Black adults (B=-2.3; p=.04). This study provides evidence of differential experiences of SDOH and mental health challenges that may warrant tailored interventions.


Subject(s)
Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/psychology , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Financial Stress/ethnology , Financial Stress/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , White People/psychology , Mental Health/ethnology , Young Adult , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/psychology , Aged , United States/epidemiology
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 928, 2024 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related financial hardship is an increasingly recognized concern for patients, families, and caregivers. Many Native American (NA) patients are at increased risk for cancer-related financial hardship due to high prevalence of low income, medical comorbidity, and lack of private health insurance. However, financial hardship screening (FHS) implementation for NA patients with cancer has not been reported. The objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to FHS implementation for NA patients. METHODS: We conducted key informant interviews with NA patients with cancer and with clinical staff at an academic cancer center. Included patients had a confirmed diagnosis of cancer and were referred to the cancer center through the Indian Health Service, Tribal health program, or Urban Indian health program. Interviews included questions regarding current financial hardship, experiences in discussing financial hardship with the cancer care and primary care teams, and acceptability of completing a financial hardship screening tool at the cancer center. Clinical staff included physicians, advanced practice providers, and social workers. Interviews focused on confidence, comfort, and experience in discussing financial hardship with patients. Recorded interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed using MAXQDA® software. RESULTS: We interviewed seven patients and four clinical staff. Themes from the interviews included: 1) existing resources and support services; 2) challenges, gaps in services, and barriers to care; 3) nuances of NA cancer care; and 4) opportunities for improved care and resources. Patients identified financial challenges to receiving cancer care including transportation, lodging, food insecurity, and utility expenses. Patients were willing to complete a FHS tool, but indicated this tool should be short and not intrusive of the patient's financial information. Clinical staff described discomfort in discussing financial hardship with patients, primarily due to a lack of training and knowledge about resources to support patients. Having designated staff familiar with I/T/U systems was helpful, but perspectives differed regarding who should administer FHS. CONCLUSIONS: We identified facilitators and barriers to implementing FHS for NA patients with cancer at both the patient and clinician levels. Findings suggest clear organizational structures and processes are needed for financial hardship to be addressed effectively.


Subject(s)
Financial Stress , Indians, North American , Neoplasms , Qualitative Research , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Indians, North American/psychology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Interviews as Topic , Aged , Adult
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(8): e2429286, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163047

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study estimates the prevalence of financial hardship among cancer survivors and investigates its associations with individual- and community-level characteristics.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Financial Stress , Neoplasms , Humans , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Adult , United States/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies
13.
Clin Imaging ; 113: 110232, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096889

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of financial hardship and Health-Related Social Needs (HRSN) among patients who missed their radiology appointment. METHODS: English-speaking adult patients, with a missed outpatient imaging appointment at any of a tertiary care imaging centers between 11/2022 and 05/2023 were eligible. We measured self-reported general financial worry using Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), imaging hardship (worry that the current imaging is a financial hardship to patient and their family), material hardship (e.g., medical debt), cost-related care nonadherence, and HRSNs including housing instability, food insecurity, transportation problems, and utility help needs. RESULTS: 282 patients were included (mean age 54.7 ± 15.0 years; 70.7 % female). Majority were non-Hispanic White (52.4 %), followed by Asian (23.0 %) and Hispanic (16.0 %) racial/ethnic background. Most missed appointments were patient-initiated (74.8 %); 13.5 % due to cost or insurance coverage and 6.4 % due to transportation and parking. Mean COST score was 26.8 with 44.4 % and 28.8 % reporting their illness and imaging as a source of financial hardship. 18.3 % and 35.2 % endorsed cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship. 32.7 % had at least one HRSNs with food insecurity the most common (25.4 %). Only 12.5 % were previously screened for financial hardship or HRSNs. Having comorbidity and living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with higher report of financial hardship and HRSNs. CONCLUSION: Financial hardship and HRSNs are common among those who miss radiology appointments. There needs to be more rigorous screening for financial hardship and HRSNs at every health encounter and interventions should be implemented to address these.


Subject(s)
Financial Stress , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Financial Stress/epidemiology , Prevalence , Adult , No-Show Patients/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Appointments and Schedules
14.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 646, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090539

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the moderating effect of financial strain or social support on depressive symptoms among older people living alone in Taiwan. Data were collected from the "Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA)," which included 1513 participants aged 65 and over, among them, 153 (10.1%) were living alone, while 1360 (89.9%) were living with others. Measurement tools included the Depression scale (CES-D), financial stress scale, social support scale, ADL scale, IADL scale, and stress scale, with Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.85, 0.78, 0.67, 0.91, 0.90, and 0.70 respectively. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to examine the moderator effect. The findings revealed that (1) Financial strain was found to moderate the relationship between living alone and depressive symptoms, acting as a promotive moderator among older men living alone. For older women, financial stress does not moderate the relationship between living alone and depressive symptoms. However, financial strain was also identified as a significant factor associated with depressive symptoms among older women living alone. (2) Social support does not moderate effect on the relationship between living alone and depressive symptoms in older men or older women. These results underscore the importance of considering financial stress in mental health policy development by government agencies. It is imperative to address the unique challenges faced by older individuals living alone, particularly in relation to financial strain, in order to promote their mental well-being.


Subject(s)
Depression , Financial Stress , Social Support , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Depression/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/economics , Longitudinal Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Financial Stress/psychology , Financial Stress/epidemiology , Taiwan/epidemiology
15.
Int J Public Health ; 69: 1607295, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39132383

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine whether life expectancy (LE) changes between 2000 and 2019 were associated with race, rural status, local economic prosperity, and changes in local economic prosperity, at the county level. Methods: Between 12/1/22 and 2/28/23, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 2000 and 2019 data from 3,123 United States counties. For Total, White, and Black populations, we compared LE changes for counties across the rural-urban continuum, the local economic prosperity continuum, and for counties in which local economic prosperity dramatically improved or declined. Results: In both years, overall, across the rural-urban continuum, and for all studied populations, LE decreased with each progression from the most to least prosperous quintile (all p < 0.001); improving county prosperity between 2000-2019 was associated with greater LE gains (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: At the county level, race, rurality, and local economic distress were all associated with LE; improvements in local economic conditions were associated with accelerated LE. Policymakers should appreciate the health externalities of investing in areas experiencing poor economic prosperity if their goal is to improve population health.


Subject(s)
Life Expectancy , Rural Population , Humans , Life Expectancy/trends , Retrospective Studies , United States , Male , Female , Urban Population , Socioeconomic Factors , Financial Stress
17.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2400093, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208390

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although financial hardship in childhood cancer contributes to poor outcomes, no standardized tool to assess its impact exists. Existing methods are heterogeneous and designed using high-income country (HIC), adult perspectives. This project aimed to construct a stakeholder-informed conceptual framework of financial hardship in childhood cancer with global relevancy. METHODS: Group concept mapping, a participatory mixed-methods approach, was used. Participants were parents or caregivers of a child with cancer, childhood cancer survivors, and clinical or nonclinical support personnel, fluent in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. A representative panel established a comprehensive list of relevant items. Participants individually sorted these items into concepts and then rated each item for impact using a four-point Likert scale. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis identified concepts. Descriptive statistics were calculated for impact ratings. RESULTS: One fourth (21/80) of participants were parents/caregivers or childhood cancer survivors. Participants worked in clinical (44/80), charity/volunteer (27/80), and other nonclinical (13/80) roles. Of the 41 represented countries, 78.0% (32) were low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Conceptual themes spanned six distinct clusters: medical, nonmedical, assistance and support, treatment impact, family impact, and caregiver impact. These were distinct in composition compared with an existing framework for adult oncology. Caregiver impact (mean, 3.39) and treatment impact (mean, 3.29) were the highest rated clusters, and impact ratings were higher in LMICs compared with HICs. CONCLUSION: We developed a framework for financial hardship in childhood cancer that reflects the voices of stakeholders, including parents and caregivers, from diverse global contexts. The findings lay a foundation for the development and validation of tools to systematically assess financial hardship in families of children with cancer and inform effective policies and interventions.


Subject(s)
Financial Stress , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/economics , Child , Adult , Caregivers/psychology , Parents/psychology , Female , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Male , Stakeholder Participation
18.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 943, 2024 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160528

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research suggests an association between COVID-19 infection and certain financial hardships in the shorter term and among single-state and privately insured samples. Whether COVID-19 is associated with financial hardship in the longer-term or among socially vulnerable populations is unknown. Therefore, we examined whether COVID-19 was associated with a range of financial hardships 18 months after initial infection among a national cohort of Veterans enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-the largest national integrated health system in the US. We additionally explored the association between Veteran characteristics and financial hardship during the pandemic, irrespective of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, telephone-based survey. Out of 600 Veterans with COVID-19 from October 2020 through April 2021 who were invited to participate, 194 Veterans with COVID-19 and 194 matched comparators without a history of infection participated. Financial hardship outcomes included overall health-related financial strain, two behavioral financial hardships (e.g., taking less medication than prescribed due to cost), and seven material financial hardships (e.g., using up most or all savings). Weighted generalized estimating equations were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of financial hardship by COVID-19 status, and to assess the relationship between infection and Veteran age, VHA copay status, and comorbidity score, irrespective of COVID-19 status. RESULTS: Among 388 respondents, 67% reported at least one type of financial hardship since March 2020, with 21% reporting behavioral hardships and 64% material hardships; 8% reported severe-to-extreme health-related financial strain. Compared with uninfected matched comparators, Veterans with a history of COVID-19 had greater risks of severe-to-extreme health-related financial strain (RR: 4.0, CI: 1.4-11.2), taking less medication due to cost (RR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.0-8.6), and having a loved one take time off work to care for them (RR: 1.9, CI: 1.1-3.6). Irrespective of COVID-19 status, Veterans aged < 65 years had a greater risk of most financial hardships compared with Veterans aged ≥ 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related financial hardships such as taking less medication due to cost and severe-to-extreme health-related financial strain were more common among Veterans with a history of COVID-19 than among matched comparators. Strategies are needed to address health-related financial hardship after COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05394025, registered 05-27-2022.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Financial Stress , Veterans , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/economics , United States/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Financial Stress/epidemiology , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Pandemics/economics , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
19.
J Affect Disord ; 366: 335-344, 2024 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that comorbidity and demographic factors added to burden on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Only one study explored the relationship between HRQoL and comorbidity in college students with mental disorders, leaving generalizability of findings uncertain. Less is known about the association of demographics on HRQoL. This study investigated HRQoL based on demographics and comorbidity among college students with mental disorders. METHODS: Participants were students (N = 5535) across 26 U.S. colleges and universities who met criteria for depression, generalized anxiety, panic, social anxiety, post-traumatic stress, or eating disorders based on self-report measures. ANOVA and linear regressions were conducted. RESULTS: Overall, female, minoritized (gender, sexual orientation, race, or ethnicity), and lower socioeconomic status students reported lower HRQoL than male, heterosexual, White, non-Hispanic, and higher socioeconomic status peers. After accounting for comorbidity, differences in physical HRQoL based on sex assigned at birth and gender were no longer significant. For mental HRQoL, only gender and sexual orientation remained significant. A greater number of comorbidities was associated with lower HRQoL regardless of demographic group. LIMITATIONS: The non-experimental design limits causal inference. The study focused on univariable associations without examining potential interactions between demographic factors. Future research should explore structural factors like discrimination. CONCLUSION: Results suggested that increased comorbidities placed an additional burden on HRQoL and that certain demographic groups were more vulnerable to HRQoL impairment among students with mental disorders. Findings suggest the need for prevention of disorders and their comorbidity and implementing tailored interventions for specific student subgroups with increased vulnerability.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Feeding and Eating Disorders , Quality of Life , Students , Humans , Female , Male , Quality of Life/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Students/psychology , Young Adult , Universities , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Adult , Gender Identity , Adolescent , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/psychology , Financial Stress/psychology , Financial Stress/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior/psychology , United States/epidemiology , Educational Status , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/psychology , Parents/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology
20.
Cancer Med ; 13(15): e7306, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39113222

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate FinTox, a concise tool for screening and managing financial toxicity in oncology settings. METHODS: Development involved qualitative interviews with healthcare providers and patients, and feedback from a 7-member expert panel resulting in a 5-item measure that evaluates financial strain, psychological responses, and care modifications. Psychometric evaluations examined factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent and convergent validity. Associations between FinTox scores and sociodemographic/medical factors were also analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Twelve healthcare providers and 20 patients were interviewed, and 268 patients (69.8% female, 47.4% non-Hispanic White) completed surveys including FinTox, the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, and sociodemographic questions. FinTox demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95). Significant correlations with the COST (r = -0.62, p < 0.001) and HRQOL measures corroborated content and convergent validity. Diagnostic accuracy was evidenced by a sensitivity of 72.3%, specificity of 85.2%, positive predictive value of 83.2%, and negative predictive value of 70.3%. Higher FinTox scores were also associated with receiving care at a safety-net hospital, Black race, household income <600% of the federal poverty level, and Stage 4 cancer. CONCLUSION: FinTox's robust psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy position it as a reliable tool for detecting financial toxicity. Future research should evaluate its responsiveness to changes over time and integration into clinical workflows.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of Results , Aged , Adult , Financial Stress
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL