Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
PLoS Med ; 17(3): e1003046, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The majority of people do not achieve recommended levels of physical activity. There is a need for effective, scalable interventions to promote activity. Self-monitoring by pedometer is a potentially suitable strategy. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief (5-minute) pedometer-based intervention ('Step It Up') delivered as part of National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks in primary care. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial was a two parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 3-month follow-up, conducted in 23 primary care practices in the East of England. Participants were 1,007 healthy adults aged 40 to 74 years eligible for an NHS Health Check. They were randomly allocated (1:1) using a web-based tool between October 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, to either intervention (505) or control group (502), stratified by primary care practice. Participants were aware of study group allocation. Control participants received the NHS Health Check only. Intervention participants additionally received Step It Up: a 5-minute face-to-face discussion, written materials, pedometer, and step chart. The primary outcome was accelerometer-based physical activity volume at 3-month follow-up adjusted for sex, 5-year age group, and general practice. Secondary outcomes included time spent in different intensities of physical activity, self-reported physical activity, and economic measures. We conducted an in-depth fidelity assessment on a subsample of Health Check consultations. Participants' mean age was 56 years, two-thirds were female, they were predominantly white, and two-thirds were in paid employment. The primary outcome was available in 859 (85.3%) participants. There was no significant between-group difference in activity volume at 3 months (adjusted intervention effect 8.8 counts per minute [cpm]; 95% CI -18.7 to 36.3; p = 0.53). We found no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes of step counts per day, time spent in moderate or vigorous activity, time spent in vigorous activity, and time spent in moderate-intensity activity (accelerometer-derived variables); as well as in total physical activity, home-based activity, work-based activity, leisure-based activity, commuting physical activity, and screen or TV time (self-reported physical activity variables). Of the 505 intervention participants, 491 (97%) received the Step it Up intervention. Analysis of 37 intervention consultations showed that 60% of Step it Up components were delivered faithfully. The intervention cost £18.04 per participant. Incremental cost to the NHS per 1,000-step increase per day was £96 and to society was £239. Adverse events were reported by 5 intervention participants (of which 2 were serious) and 5 control participants (of which 2 were serious). The study's limitations include a participation rate of 16% and low return of audiotapes by practices for fidelity assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In this large well-conducted trial, we found no evidence of effect of a plausible very brief pedometer intervention embedded in NHS Health Checks on objectively measured activity at 3-month follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN72691150).


Subject(s)
Actigraphy/instrumentation , Exercise , Fitness Trackers , Healthy Lifestyle , Primary Health Care , State Medicine , Actigraphy/economics , Adult , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England , Female , Fitness Trackers/economics , Health Care Costs , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/economics , State Medicine/economics , Time Factors
2.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 7(7): e12768, 2019 07 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31339101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of fitness trackers as tools of self-management to promote physical activity is increasing. However, the content of fitness trackers remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) to examine if swim-proof fitness trackers below Aus $150 (US$ 105) incorporate behavior change techniques (BCTs) that relate to self-management strategies to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior and to determine if content of the fitness trackers correspond to physical activity guidelines. METHODS: A total of two raters used the BCTTv1 to code 6 fitness trackers that met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were the ability to track activity, be swim proof, be compatible with Android and Apple operating systems, and cost below Aus $150. RESULTS: All fitness trackers contained BCTs known to promote physical activity, with the most frequently used BCTs overlapping with self-management strategies, including goal setting, self-monitoring, and feedback on behavior. Fitbit Flex 2 (Fitbit Inc) contained the most BCTs at 20. Huawei Band 2 Pro (Huawei Technologies) and Misfit Shine 2 (Fossil Group) contained the least BCTs at 11. CONCLUSIONS: Fitness trackers contain evidence-based BCTs that overlap with self-management strategies, which have been shown to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior. Fitness trackers offer the prospect for physical activity interventions that are cost-effective and easily accessed by a wide population.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/instrumentation , Fitness Trackers/standards , Self-Management/methods , Australia/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Exercise/psychology , Fitness Trackers/economics , Humans , Sedentary Behavior , Software Design
3.
Trends Biotechnol ; 37(6): 563-566, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30851983

ABSTRACT

Wearable medical devices (WMDs) will advance point-of-care diagnostics and therapeutics. This article analyses the market and patents for wearable devices. Activity monitors have the largest market share, and the intellectual property landscape is dominated by electronics corporations. However, the majority of these patents have not been realized in commercial products.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology , Fitness Trackers , Patents as Topic , Wearable Electronic Devices , Biomedical Technology/economics , Biomedical Technology/instrumentation , Biomedical Technology/legislation & jurisprudence , Fitness Trackers/economics , Fitness Trackers/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Wearable Electronic Devices/economics , Wearable Electronic Devices/statistics & numerical data
4.
J Sports Sci ; 37(7): 735-740, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30238836

ABSTRACT

Low-cost physical activity monitors may provide a more accurate measure of physical activity than subjective methods (e.g., self-report) while being less costly than research-grade accelerometers. The present study assessed the validity of a low-cost monitor (Movband 2) to estimate physical activity behavior/intensity. Participants (N = 23, n = 16 female, BMI = 22.9 ± 4.0 kg/m2, age = 21.9 ± 1.6 years) completed four, five-minute treadmill stages (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 MPH) while wearing both the Movband and the previously-validated Actigraph monitor. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was recorded during each stage (Laboratory assessment). A subset (n = 15, n = 10 female, BMI = 22.2 ± 3.2 kg/m2, age = 21.5 ± 0.8 years) of these participants then wore the two accelerometers for three days (Free-living assessment). During the Laboratory assessment there were strong, significant (r = 0.94, p ≤ 0.001) relationships between Movband and Actigraph counts and VO2. During Free-living assessment there was also a strong, significant (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) correlation between Movband and Actigraph counts. The low-cost, Movband accelerometer appears to provide a valid assessment of physical activity behavior/intensity.


Subject(s)
Accelerometry/standards , Exercise Test , Exercise , Fitness Trackers/standards , Accelerometry/economics , Accelerometry/instrumentation , Activities of Daily Living , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Fitness Trackers/economics , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Oxygen Consumption , Perception , Physical Exertion/physiology , Wrist , Young Adult
5.
Biotechniques ; 63(5): 215-220, 2017 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29185921

ABSTRACT

Analysis of mouse behavior often requires expensive equipment and transfer of the mice to new test environments, which could trigger confounding behavior alterations. Here, we describe a system for tracking mouse behavior in home cages using a low-cost USB webcam and free software (Fiji and wrMTrck). We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method by tracking differences in distance traveled, speed, and movement tracks between wild-type mice and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) model mice (SOD1G93A).


Subject(s)
Behavior Observation Techniques/methods , Behavior , Fitness Trackers/economics , Video Recording/methods , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/psychology , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Movement , Software/economics , Walking Speed
6.
Trials ; 17(1): 303, 2016 06 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27350131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physical activity interventions that are targeted at individuals can be effective in encouraging people to be more physically active. However, most such interventions are too long or complex and not scalable to the general population. This trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention when delivered as part of preventative health checks in primary care (National Health Service (NHS) Health Check). METHODS/DESIGN: The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial is a two parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation and follow-up at 3 months. A total of 1,140 participants will be recruited from 23 primary care practices in the east of England. Participants eligible for an NHS Health Check and who are considered suitable to take part by their doctor and able to provide written informed consent are eligible for the trial. Participants are randomly assigned at the beginning of the NHS Health Check to either 1) the control arm, in which they receive only the NHS Health Check, or 2) the intervention arm, in which they receive the NHS Health Check plus 'Step It Up' (a very brief intervention that can be delivered in 5 minutes by nurses and/or healthcare assistants at the end of the Health Check). 'Step It Up' includes (1) a face-to-face discussion, including feedback on current activity level, recommendations for physical activity, and information on how to use a pedometer, set step goals, and monitor progress; (2) written material supporting the discussion and tips and links to further resources to help increase physical activity; and (3) a pedometer to wear and a step chart for monitoring progress. The primary outcome is accelerometer counts per minute at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the time spent in the different levels of physical activity, self-reported physical activity and economic measures. Trial recruitment is underway. DISCUSSION: The VBI trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Step It Up intervention delivered during NHS Health Checks and will inform policy decisions about introducing very brief interventions into routine primary care practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN72691150 . Registered on 17 July 2014.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Exercise , Health Behavior , Health Care Costs , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Prevention/economics , Risk Reduction Behavior , Self Care/economics , State Medicine/economics , Actigraphy/economics , Actigraphy/instrumentation , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Clinical Protocols , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England , Fitness Trackers/economics , Health Status , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Prevention/methods , Research Design , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...